1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to asset tracking, and more particularly to localizing tagged assets using modulated backscatter.
2. Related Art
In a conventional radio frequency identification (RFID) system, data encoded in a tag is communicated by the tag to a reader in response to a query from the reader. A tag may be batteryless (i.e., a passive tag), in which case a transmitted beam from the reader energizes the tag's circuitry, and the tag then communicates data encoded in the tag to the reader using modulated backscatter. Since the tag is typically affixed to an asset (e.g., an item being tracked by the RFID system), the data encoded in the tag may be used to uniquely identify the asset.
In the case of a semi-passive tag, a battery included with the tag powers the tag's circuitry. When the tag detects the transmitted beam from the reader, the tag communicates data encoded in the tag to the reader using modulated backscatter. In the case of an active tag, a battery included with the tag may power the communication to the reader without first detecting or being energized by the transmit beam. Semi-passive tags and active tags may also include data encoded in the tag that may uniquely identify the asset.
In conventional RFID systems, the ability of the reader to determine the location of a tag may be limited because the reader typically transmits a beam with a broad pattern. Conventional RFID systems may employ a reader including one or more antennas, where each antenna has a fixed beam pattern. These antennas are typically separated by a spacing that is large compared to the transmitted beam's wavelength, in order to provide diversity against multi-path fading and to increase the reliability of receiving the communication from tags with unknown orientations. In addition, conventional RFID systems may be limited when the communication range between a single fixed reader and a tag is too small to read all tags in an area of interest.
Embodiments of the invention include a method for receiving modulated backscatter signals using a reader from one or more marker tags, receiving a modulated backscatter signal using the reader from an asset tag, estimating parameters of the modulated backscatter signals received from the one or more marker tags and estimating a parameter of the modulated backscatter signal received from the asset tag. The method further includes determining a location estimate for the asset tag, the location estimate based on the estimated parameters of the modulated backscatter signals received from the one or more marker tags and the estimated parameter of the modulated backscatter signal received from the asset tag.
According to another embodiment, a method includes estimating first parameters of modulated backscatter signals received from a plurality of marker tags when a reader is at a first position, estimating a second parameter of a modulated backscatter signal received from an asset tag when the reader is at the first position, moving the reader to a second position, estimating third parameters of the modulated backscatter signals received from the plurality of marker tags when the reader is at the second position, and estimating a fourth parameter of the modulated backscatter signal received from the asset tag when the reader is at the second position. The method further includes estimating a location of the asset tag based on the first parameters, the second parameter, the third parameters and the fourth parameter.
Embodiments of the invention include means for receiving modulated backscatter signals from one or more marker tags, means for receiving a modulated backscatter signal from an asset tag, means for estimating parameters of the modulated backscatter signals received from the one or more marker tags, means for estimating a parameter of the modulated backscatter signal received from the asset tag and means for determining a location estimate for the asset tag, the location estimate based on the estimated parameters of the modulated backscatter signals received from the one or more marker tags and the estimated parameter of the modulated backscatter signal received from the asset tag.
Elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and are not drawn to scale. The dimensions of some of the elements may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help improve the understanding of various embodiments of the invention.
The present invention includes methods and systems for localizing an asset using the modulated backscatter from an asset tag and one or more marker tags. The modulated backscattered signals from marker tags may be used by a reader and a location module to estimate location of the reader and the asset tags. An asset is any item whose location is of interest, and an asset tag is a tag associated with the asset, for example, by affixing the asset tag to the asset. Assets may be inanimate objects such as books, or persons, animals, and/or plants.
The methods and systems enable location-enabled inventory, where the estimated locations of tagged assets are determined in an area of interest. Furthermore, in embodiments including a mobile reader, the methods and systems can localize asset tags throughout a large area and can, for example, take an inventory of tagged assets throughout the large area.
The system includes the reader and the location module and one or more marker tags that are used to provide location estimates for the asset tag based partially on a prior knowledge of the location of each of the one or more marker tags. The location for each marker tag may be stored in a database. A location estimate for an asset tag may be determined based on the marker tags. Once the location of an asset tag is estimated, the asset tag may act as a marker tag, and is described herein as a simulated marker tag.
A location module determines a location estimate for the asset tag using the estimated parameters of the modulated backscatter signals received from one or more marker tags and from the asset tag. The parameters may be represented by scalar or vector values, and may include, for example, the angle of arrival of the modulated backscatter signals with respect to an axis of the reader, and/or a range (i.e., distance) from the marker tag and/or the asset tag to the reader. Using the known locations of the marker tags and the estimated parameters, the location estimate of the asset tag can be determined. A location estimate may be a relative location, an absolute location, and/or a zone including the marker tags.
In one example, a zone including an asset tag may be determined by marker tags at each end of a bookshelf. When the asset tag is affixed to an item on the bookshelf, such as a book, the book may thereby be determined to be in the zone, and likewise on the bookshelf. In this configuration, a relative location of the reader may also be determined by processing the received modulated backscatter signals from the asset tag and the marker tags.
In various embodiments, the reader 110 includes one or more antennas (not shown) for transmitting electromagnetic signals to the marker tags 120 and the asset tag 140, and one or more antennas for receiving the modulated backscatter signals from the marker tags 120 and the asset tag 140. The reader 110 may operate in one or more of the following modes: (i) single antenna transmission, multi-antenna reception; (ii) multi-antenna transmission, multi-antenna reception; and/or (iii) multi-antenna transmission, single antenna reception.
The marker tags 120 and asset tags 140 communicate with the reader 110 using modulated backscatter signals. Reader 110 receives modulated backscatter signals from the marker tags 120 and the asset tag 140, and estimates parameters of the modulated backscatter signals. As used herein, an estimated parameter of a modulated backscatter signal received from a marker tag 120 and/or an asset tag 140 includes any measurable quantity, characteristic, or information determined and/or estimated from the modulated backscatter signal.
An estimated parameter may include, but is not limited to, an RFID preamble, an RFID payload data and/or additional information, a signal strength of the modulated backscatter signal received from a marker tag 120 and/or an asset tag 140, an angle of arrival of the modulated backscatter signal received from a marker tag 120 and/or an asset tag 140, an antenna array response for a modulated backscatter signal received from a marker tag 120 and/or an asset tag 140, a range from a marker tag 120 and/or an asset tag 140 to the reader 110, a time of flight of the modulated backscatter signal from the marker tag 120 and/or asset tag 140 to the reader 110. When reader 110 estimates the parameters of the modulated backscatter signals over time, the location module 170 may determine a direction of motion of an asset tag 140 and/or a velocity of an asset tag 140.
The location of the marker tag 120 may be stored in a database (not shown) that is accessible to the location module 170. The location of the marker tag 120 may include an absolute or relative location in two-dimensional (x,y) coordinate space, or an absolute or relative location in three-dimensional (x,y,z) coordinate space.
The location module 170 may provide a location estimate 180 of the asset tag 140 by having reader 110 read (e.g., receive modulated backscatter signals) from one or more of the marker tags 120 and the asset tag 140 in the FOV 160 of reader 110. The location estimate 180 may be an absolute or a relative location estimate of the asset tag 140, may provide a determination that asset tag 140 is included in the zone 130, may provide a probabilistic estimate of the absolute or relative location of asset tag 140, and/or may provide a probabilistic estimate whether the asset tag 140 is included in the zone 130. For example, when the reader 110 reads asset tag 140B, the location module 170 may compare the location of asset tag 140B to the location of the marker tags 120A and 120B and provide the location estimate 180 including the determination that the zone 130 includes the asset tag 140B.
In various embodiments, the location module 170 may provide the location estimate 180 at multiple time instances and/or over multiple time periods. Thus, the location estimate 180 may be used to determine a direction of motion of the asset tag 140. This enables, for example, a reader 110 located at a doorway to determine whether an asset tag 140 may be entering or exiting a particular region of interest.
In various embodiments, marker tags 120 and/or asset tags 140 may be passive, semi-passive, active, or combinations of these kinds of tags. For example, some marker tags 120 may be semi-passive in order to provide a high spatial-resolution identification of zones, while asset tags 140 may be passive tags in order to reduce cost. If a range between reader 110 and the marker tags 120 and asset tags 140 is larger than suitable for passive tags, then both marker tags 120 and asset tags 140 may be semi-passive.
Once the location of an asset tag 140 has been estimated, the asset tag 140 can play the role of a marker tag 120, thus reducing the density of marker tags 120. An asset tag 140 used in this manner may be referred to as a simulated marker tag. A zone may thus be determined based on one or more simulated marker tags.
The reader 110 may receive modulated backscatter signals from an asset tag 140 that is passing through dock door 310. Determining that the asset tag 140 is passing through dock door 310 may be based on a location estimate 180 that is within a radius from marker tag 120A.
In terms of the standard complex baseband representation for passband signals, if the transmitter beamforming system has N antenna elements, then the transmitted signal ui(t) from the ith antenna, i=1, . . . ,N, is given by wis(t),where wi is a complex gain termed the ith beamforming coefficient, and s(t) is the signal (in general, complex-valued) to be transmitted. In a vector format,
u(t)=(u1(t), . . . ,uN(t))T,
w=(w1, . . . ,wN)T, and
u(t)=ws(t).
If the signal s(t) is narrowband (i.e., its bandwidth is small relative to the coherence bandwidth of the channel), then the channel gain from the ith transmit element to the marker tag 120 and/or asset tag 140 in such a system can be modeled as a complex scalar hi. Defining the channel vector
h=(h1, . . . ,hN)T,
the received signal at the marker tag 120 and/or asset tag 140 can be modeled as:
y(t)=hTws(t)+n(t),
where n(t) denotes noise.
The modulated backscattered signal from the marker tag 120 and/or asset tag 140 therefore has power proportional to (hTw)2. The channel vector h depends on the location of the marker tag 120 and/or asset tag 140 relative to the antennas 440. For example, when antennas 440 are linear array with elements spaced by d, the channel vector for a marker tag 120 and/or asset tag 140 lying at an angle θ relative to the broadside is given by:
a(θ)=(1,α,α2, . . . ,αN−1)T,
where α=exp(j2πd sin θ/λ), and λ denotes the carrier wavelength. Thus, the strength of the modulated backscatter signal from the marker tag 120 and/or asset tag 140 is related to the location of the marker tag 120 and/or asset tag 140 relative to the reader 110.
Using transmitter beamforming, the location module 170 may provide the location estimate 180 from the modulated backscatter signals as follows. A main lobe of the transmit beam, such as beam 150, may be scanned through a region. The beam 150 is electronically steered using an array of antennas 440 by controlling the relative phases and amplitudes of the radio frequency (RF) signals transmitted from the antennas 440. The strength of the received modulated backscatter signal from the marker tags 120 as a function of the scan angle may be provided to marker tag feedback 480 and to the localization module 170. Using this information the location estimate 180 including the angle of arrival of the modulated backscatter signals received from the marker tags 120 can be estimated.
The peak in the modulated backscatter signal strength as a function of the scan angle, for example, can be used to estimate parameters of the received modulated backscatter signal including the angle of arrival. For a high spatial-resolution estimate, suppose that wk is the vector of transmit beamforming coefficients corresponding to the kth scan, where k=1, . . . , K, and that h(x) is the channel vector from the reader 110 to a marker tag 120 and/or an asset tag 140 at location x relative to the reader 110. Here x may denote a three-dimensional position, a two-dimensional position, or an angle of arrival and/or departure relative to the transmit beamforming array of reader 110. The vector of received powers over the K scans is then proportional to:
Q(x)=((h(x)Tw1)2, . . . ,(h(x)TwK)2).
A comparison of the actual vector of received powers P=(P1, . . . , PK) with Q(x) can therefore be used to estimate x from among a set of feasible values for x. For example, consider an array with array response a(θ). In order to form a beam towards angle θk on the kth scan, the beamforming coefficients are set to wk=a*(θk), so that the peak of (hTwk)2 occurs at h=a(θk). The vector of expected receive powers from the marker tag 120 and/or the asset tag 140 at angle θ is therefore given by:
Q(θ)=((a(θ)Ha(θ1))2, . . . ,(a(θ)Ha(θK))2).
A comparison of the actual vector of received powers P=(P1, . . . , PK) with Q(θ) can now be used to estimate θ.
This technique generalizes to two-dimensional arrays, which enables the estimation of two angles. While angle estimation may be based on comparing the shape of P with Q(θ), the strength of P (the received signal strength) can be used to estimate the range of the marker tag 120 and/or the asset tag 140 relative to the reader 110. Thus, a two-dimensional transmit beamforming array can be used to estimate the three-dimensional location of a marker tag 120 and/or an asset tag 140 relative to the reader 110, by combining estimates of two angles and a range.
If the marker tag 120 transmits a modulated backscatter signal including a known data sequence, then a correlation against the sequence can be used to provide an estimate of the parameters of the received modulated backscatter signal. The modulated backscatter signal from a marker tag 120 and/or an asset tag 140 is also known as an uplink. The correlation can provide an estimate of the complex baseband channel gain, which is proportional to hTw, and can be used for adaptation of the transmit beamforming coefficients w. For example, let sample y[l] correspond to the lth symbol, b[l], transmitted on the uplink. Then:
y[l]=b[l]βhTw+N[l],
where N[l] denotes noise, and β is the overall complex gain seen on the uplink due to modulated backscatter from the marker tag 120 and/or the asset tag 140 and the propagation to reader 110. Then, the correlation
provides an estimate of βhTw which can be used to adapt w to maximize the gain (hTw)2.
This technique is an implicit feedback mechanism, since the reader 110 is extracting information about, and possibly adapting, the downlink based on information extracted from the uplink signal. Alternatively, if the data demodulation on the uplink is reliable enough, then this can be used for decision-directed parameter estimation by reader 110 to reduce the requirement for marker tag 120 to send a known segment of data. Thus, the symbols b[l] can be replaced by their estimates in such a decision-directed adaptation. The reader 110 could also estimate the average received power on the uplink by, for example, computing an average of |y[l]|2. The parameter being estimated may include explicit feedback sent by the marker tag 120 to the reader 110. An example of explicit feedback is when the marker tag 120 encodes specific information regarding its received signal in the data that it is sending back in the modulated backscatter signal.
The reader 110 may also use transmitter beamforming to reduce interference between conventional RFID systems and/or other transmitter beamforming systems that may be in the same area. Using the marker tags 120, the reader 110 may use transmitter beamforming to direct the transmitted RF energy, such as beam 150, to desired areas and away from undesired areas using marker tag feedback 480 to control transmit beamforming module 460. The feedback from the marker tag 120 can be implicit or explicit, as discussed herein. Thus, transmitter beamforming and/or power control as described herein can reduce interference and thus accommodate multiple RFID systems and/or multiple readers 110 in close proximity.
Reader 110 may include receive beamforming implemented in baseband, as shown in
For example, consider narrowband signaling (in which the signal bandwidth is smaller than the channel coherence bandwidth) and a reader 110 with M antennas. Using the complex baseband representation for the passband received signals at the M antennas, the received signal for the jth antenna, where j=1, . . . , M, can be written as yj(t)=hjv(t)+nj(t), where v(t) is the signal backscattered by the tag, hj is the complex channel gain from the tag to the jth antenna element, and nj(t) is the noise seen by the jth antenna element. Using the vector notation:
y(t)=(y1(t), . . . ,yM(t))T,
h=(h1, . . . ,hM)T,
n(t)=(n1(t), . . . ,nM(t))T, then
y(t)=hv(t)+n(t).
The vector h may be called the receive array response, or the spatial channel from the marker tag 120 and/or asset tag 140 to the reader 110.
It is also useful to consider a discrete-time mode of the preceding representation (possibly obtained by filtering and sampling the continuous-time vector signal y(t)), as follows:
y[l]=hb[l]+n[l],
where b[l] may denote the lth symbol transmitted on the uplink. A receiver beamforming system may form a spatial correlation of the vector received signal with complex-valued receive beamforming coefficients. Thus, let w=(w1, . . . , wM)T denote a vector of complex-valued beamforming coefficients, or beamforming weights. Then a receiver beamforming system may form the inner-product:
r(t)=wHy(t)=(wHh)v(t)+wHn(t).
For the discrete-time model, the corresponding inner product may follow the model:
r[l]=wHy[l]=(wHh)b[l]+wHn[l].
An implementation of such a beamforming operation corresponds to phase shifts, implemented in baseband as shown in
In various embodiments, receive beamforming may be implemented in the RF band using a phase adjustment of the modulated backscatter signals received by individual elements of antennas 540, according to beamforming techniques known in the art. The beamforming coefficients w may be adapted by the receive beamforming module in order to track a desired signal of interest, which might, for example, be known symbols sent on the uplink by the tag. The values of the adapted weights provide information regarding the receive array response h. Alternatively, the receive beamforming module may estimate the receive array response h directly from y(t), for example, by correlating it against a set of known or estimated symbols. Another quantity of interest is the spatial covariance matrix C:
C=E[y(t)yH(t)],
which can be estimated, for example, by summing or averaging the outer products y[l]yH[l].
The receive array response corresponding to the marker tag 120 and/or asset tag 140 can then be used by the location module 170 to provide the location estimate 180 for asset tag 140, according to techniques known in the art. The location module 170 may also use second order statistics, such as the spatial covariance matrix C. In typical RFID protocols, the data modulated by a conventional RFID tag includes a known preamble, followed by a payload that may include a tag identity and/or additional information. In various embodiments, the marker tag 120 and/or the asset tag 140 may use a known preamble to estimate the receive array response. In addition to the preamble provided by the RFID protocol, a larger training sequence that improves the estimation of the receive array response can be provided by explicitly configuring the payload to contain additional information including a known data segment. For example, for the discrete-time model:
y[l]=hb[l]+n[l],
the receive array response h may be estimated using the correlation
where the sequence of symbols b[l] is known a priori due to being part of a known preamble or training sequence, as discussed herein.
The receive beamforming module 560 may combine the signals received from antennas 540 using a combination of training and decision-directed adaptation according to techniques known in the art. For example, the receive beamforming module 560 may include adaptive algorithms known in the art based on the linear minimum mean squared error (MMSE) criterion. For example, for the discrete-time model:
r[l]=wHy[l]=(wHh)b[l]+wHn[l],
the receive beamforming coefficients w may be adapted to minimize the mean squared error E[|wHy[l]−b[l]|2]. This can be implemented by algorithms that are known in the art, including least mean squares (LMS), recursive least squares (RLS) or block least squares (BLS), and/or variations thereof. If a marker tag 120 and/or asset tag 140 is communicating with the reader, and the noise is white, then the MMSE beamforming coefficients are a scalar multiple of h. Thus, adaptation of w provides information about the receive array response h. The beamforming coefficients w thus determined may be provided to the location module 170. The location module can also be provided with additional information such as the spatial covariance matrix C.
In various embodiments, reader 110 may perform data demodulation without using a receiver beamforming system such as illustrated in
y[l]=hb[l]+n[l],
a decision-directed estimation of h may estimate the receive array response h using the correlation
where the estimates of the symbols b[l] are obtained from demodulators.
As described herein, the receiver array response h may be estimated by various methods including direct estimation by correlation of the vector received modulated backscatter signal against known or estimated signals, and indirect estimation by adapting receive beamforming weights w. Estimates of the receive array response may be used by the location module 170 to provide the location estimate 180 for the marker tag 120 and/or asset tag 140, relative to the reader 110, since the receive array response h depends on the location of the marker tag 120 and/or asset tag 140 relative to the antennas 540 in the receive antenna array.
For example, when antennas 540 are a linear array with elements spaced by d, the channel vector for a marker tag 120 and/or asset tag 140 at an angle θ relative to the broadside is given by:
a(θ)=(1,α,α2, . . . ,αN−1)T,
where α=exp(j2πd sin θ/λ) and λ denotes the carrier wavelength. For a line of sight (LOS) link between the antennas 540 and the marker tag 120 and/or asset tag 140, the direction in which the marker tag 120 and/or asset tag 140 lies, relative to the current position of the antennas 540, can be estimated by maximizing |aH(θ)h| as a function of θ over its permissible range. For an embodiment where antennas 540 are a two-dimensional antenna array, two angles may be estimated. Furthermore, the received signal strength can be used to estimate the range, which then enables three-dimensional location. Other techniques known in the art for estimating the range can also be used, such as using frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) waveforms.
Once the location of the marker tags 120 and/or asset tag 140 relative to the reader 110 have been determined by the location module 170, a comparison of these locations can be used to determine the location estimate 180 of the asset tag 140 relative to the marker tags 120. Thus, if the absolute location of the marker tags 120 is known, then the absolute location of the asset tag 140 can be determined. Alternatively, the location module 170 may compare location-related parameters such as transmit or receive beamforming coefficients, or estimates of the receive array response, in order to provide the location estimate 180 for the asset tag 140 relative to the marker tags 120. Such a location estimate 180 may be quantized to a zone, as described herein, instead of being an explicit estimate in a two-dimensional or three-dimensional coordinate system. As discussed with reference to
If the antennas 440 described with reference to
A reader 110 including transmitter and/or receiver beamforming may provide improved performance by using space division multiple access (SDMA) methods known in the art. For example, reader 110 can direct its transmitted energy in beam 150 to a small region, thereby reducing the number of marker tags 120 that are illuminated by beam 150. In various embodiments, the use of SDMA may simplify the task of singulation. For a reader 110 including receive beamforming, multiuser detection techniques and algorithms such as MUSIC can be used to successfully decode simultaneous responses from multiple marker tags 120 based on the differences in their receive array responses. Furthermore, if the marker tag 120 payload includes data encoded in a direct sequence spread spectrum format, then multiple tags may be read at the same time by employing code division multiple access (CDMA) techniques known in the art to successfully decode multiple responses by received by reader 110. In a reader 110 with receiver beamforming capabilities, such CDMA techniques can be used in conjunction with SDMA.
Reader 110 may also be used to determine range estimates. The geometry for a reader 110 is analogous to radar and/or sonar since the modulated backscatter signals from marker tags 120 and asset tags 140 are electronically reflected back to reader 110. Therefore, according to methods known in the art, radar and/or sonar techniques can be used to estimate range information. For example, the reader 110 can transmit beam 150 including a frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) waveform instead of a continuous wave (CW) tone, and can process the return from the marker tag 120 and/or asset tag 140 to detect the frequency difference between the transmitted FMCW waveform and the received FMCW waveform, and thereby estimate the range as may be done in FMCW radar. Reader 110 may be used to determine range information using the strength of a modulated backscatter signal received from a marker tag 120 and/or an asset tag 140.
In a simple line of sight (LOS) environment without a ground reflection 620, a maximum likelihood (ML) estimate of the location of the marker tag 120 and/or the asset tag 140 corresponds to maximizing the correlation of the received array response against the array manifold. However, for a multipath environment, the ML estimate depends on the geometry. In one example, a dominant multipath component may be the ground reflection 620 reflected from ground 630. Other reflecting or scattering objects between the reader 110 and marker tag 120 and/or asset tag 140 may also produce multipath components.
The complex baseband received array response corresponding to the multipath environment illustrated in
h=α1a1(xt,yt,zt)+α2a2(xt,yt,zt)+N
where a1 is the array response corresponding to the direct backscatter 610 (LOS path), a2 is the array response corresponding to path from the ground reflection 620, α1,α2 are complex gains corresponding to these paths and depend on the propagation environment, and may be unknown, and N is noise. The receive array response h above may denote an estimate of the receive array response, obtained using one of the techniques discussed herein, and the noise N may be interpreted as estimation noise, which is typically well approximated as white and Gaussian.
One approach to modeling these complex gains is to obtain a joint ML estimate of the complex gains and the location of marker tag 120, (xt,yt,zt), by performing the minimization:
minα
where H is the conjugate transpose and the minimization is optimal when the noise, N, is additive white Gaussian.
One solution known in the art is to choose a location of marker tag 120 (xt,yt,zt) that minimizes the projection of y orthogonal to the subspace spanned by a1(xt,yt,zt) and a2(xt,yt,zt). The search for the best estimate of the location (xt,yt,zt) can be constrained further based on additional information (e.g., range estimates, or prior knowledge of the distance of the reader 110 from the location estimate of the marker tag 120.)
Other solutions known in the art include use of algorithms such as MUSIC or ESPRIT for finding the dominant multipath components, based on the spatial correlation matrix. In general, finding the best fit location for marker tag 120 for a particular receive array response can be achieved using standard ML or Bayesian techniques that take into account models of the multipath environment.
For a rich scattering environment, where the multipath is not sparse enough to model as described herein, the dependence of the receive array response for the location of marker tag 120 may not be correctly modeled as described herein. However, the received array response still varies smoothly with the location of marker tag 120. Thus, if one or more marker-tags 120 are placed densely enough, then a comparison of the array response for an asset tag 140 (
For example, if the received array response is highly correlated with those for the marker tags 120 on a shelf 210 (
In the mobile configuration, reader 110 may receive modulated backscatter signals from a plurality of marker tags 120 and an asset tag 140 using a reader 701, where reader 701 is an embodiment of reader 110 at the first position. Then, the reader 702 may receive modulated backscatter signals from the plurality of marker tags 120 and the asset tag 140, where reader 702 is an embodiment of reader 110 at the second position.
As illustrated in
Similarly, angles 740 and 760 may be defined from the marker tags 120A and 120B, respectively, and the axis of reader 702. Angle 750 may be defined from the asset tag 140 and the axis of reader 702. Likewise, ranges 745 and 765 may be defined from the marker tags 120A and 120B, respectively, and the reader 702. Range 755 may be defined as the distance from asset tag 140 and reader 702.
In one embodiment, estimated parameters of the modulated backscatter signals received from marker tags 120A and 120B include the angles 710 and 730 (with respect to the axis of reader 701), and angles 740 and 760 (with respect to the axis of reader 702). In this embodiment, the estimated parameters of the modulated backscatter signals received from the asset tag 140 include the angles 720 and 750.
Since the positions of the marker tags 120A and 120B are known, the location module 170 may provide the location estimate 180 for the asset tag 140 using the locations of marker tags 120A and 120B, the angles 710, 720, 730, 740, 750, 760, and geometry, by first estimating the locations of the reader 701 and the reader 702. The location of the reader 701 can be estimated using the locations of the marker tags 120A and 120B, the angles 710 and 730, and simple geometric calculations. The location of the reader 702 can likewise be estimated.
The location module 170 may provide the location estimate 180 for the asset tag 140 as follows: denote (x1,y1) the location of marker tag 120A, (x2,y2) the location of marker tag 120B, θ1 the angle 730, and θ2 the angle 710. Then, the location (a1,b1) of reader 701 can be estimated by solving the following equations:
The location module 170 may estimate the location of the reader 702 using the locations of the marker tags 120A and 120B, the angles 740 and 760, and similar geometric calculations.
Subsequently, the location of the asset tag 140 may be estimated using the estimates of the locations of the readers 701 and 702, the angles 720 and 750, and similar geometric calculations. Although
In various embodiments, estimated parameters of the modulated backscatter signals received from marker tags 120A and 120B include the ranges 715 and 735 (to reader 701) and ranges 745 and 765 (to reader 702). In these embodiments, the estimated parameters of the modulated backscatter signals received from the asset tag 140 include the ranges 725 and 755.
Since the positions of the marker tags 120A and 120B are known, the location module 170 may provide the location estimate 180 for the asset tag 140 using, for example, the locations of marker tags 120A and 120B, the ranges 715, 725, 735, 745, 755, 765, and geometry. By first estimating the locations of the reader 701 and the reader 702, the location of the asset tag 140 may be estimated. The location of the reader 701 can be estimated using the locations of the marker tags 120A and 120B, the ranges 715 and 735, and geometric calculations. The location of the reader 701 may be likewise estimated.
The location module 170 may estimate the location of an asset tag 140 as follows: denote by (x1,y1) the location of marker tag 120A, (x2,y2) the location of marker tag 120B, r1 the range 715, and r2 the range 735. Then, the location (a1,b1) of reader 701 can be estimated by solving the following equations:
(a1−x1)2+(b1−y1)2=r12, (a1−x2)2+(b1−y2)2=r22.
There are two possible solutions, corresponding to the two intersections of circles of radius r1 and r2 centered at the marker tags 120A and 120B, respectively. (If the circles do not intersect, then there is no solution to the preceding equation.) The solution that corresponds to the location of the reader 701 can be determined based on, for example, by knowing which side of the marker tags 120A and 120B the reader 110 is on.
The location module may estimate the location of the reader 702 using the locations of the marker tags 120A and 120B, the ranges 745 and 765, and similar geometric calculations. Subsequently, the location estimate 180 of the asset tag 140 may be estimated using the estimates of the locations of the readers 701 and 702, the ranges 725 and 755, and similar geometric calculations. The location of the asset tag 140, reader 701 and 702 may also be estimated in three dimensions using geometry.
In various embodiments, the estimated parameters of the modulated backscatter signals received from marker tags 120 and/or asset tag 140 are received array responses. In an environment with multipath propagation, location module 170 may provide the location estimate 180 for the marker tags 120 and/or asset tag 140 using the received array responses and may use prior knowledge of, or models of, the multipath environment. For example, if the multipath environment consists primarily of a line-of-sight path and a ground reflection, as illustrated in
The embodiments discussed herein are illustrative of the present invention. As these embodiments are described with reference to illustrations, various modifications or adaptations of the specific elements or methods described may become apparent to those skilled in the art. All such modifications, adaptations, or variations that rely on the teachings of the present invention, and through which these teachings have advanced the art, are considered to be in the spirit and scope of the present invention. Hence, these descriptions and drawings should not be considered in a limiting sense, as it is understood that the present invention is in no way limited only to the embodiments illustrated.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4224472 | Zarount | Sep 1980 | A |
4688026 | Scribner et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
5227803 | O'Connor et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5583517 | Yokev et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5649295 | Shober et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5924020 | Forssen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6046683 | Pidwerbetsky et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6380894 | Boyd et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6486769 | McLean | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6577238 | Whitesmith et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6600418 | Francis et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6882315 | Richley et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7009561 | Menache et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7030761 | Bridgelall et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7084740 | Bridgelall | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7161489 | Sullivan et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7187288 | Mendolia et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7295114 | Drzaic et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7378967 | Sullivan et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7394358 | Cherry | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7403120 | Duron et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7408507 | Paek et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7420509 | Minkoff | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7508306 | Fujii et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7679561 | Elwell et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7812719 | Djuric et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7904244 | Sugla | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8284027 | Taki et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8364164 | Phatak et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8624707 | Konishi et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20020019702 | Nysen | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020070862 | Francis et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020145563 | Kane et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030007473 | Strong et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030117320 | Kim et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050207617 | Sarnoff | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050237953 | Carrender et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060022800 | Krishna et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060022815 | Fischer et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060033609 | Bridgelall | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060044147 | Knox et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060232412 | Tabacman et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060244588 | Hannah et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070279277 | Kuramoto et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070285245 | Djuric et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070290802 | Batra et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080012710 | Sadr | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080030422 | Gevargiz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080068265 | Kalliola et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080100439 | Rinkes | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109970 | Hutton | May 2008 | A1 |
20080111693 | Johnson et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080143482 | Shoarinejad et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080157972 | Duron et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080191941 | Saban et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080242240 | Rofougaran et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266131 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080311931 | Venkatachalam et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080318632 | Rofougaran et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100039929 | Cho et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1610258 | Dec 2005 | EP |
2002271229 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003185730 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2004354351 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2006105723 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2007508773 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007114003 | May 2007 | JP |
2007170853 | Jul 2007 | JP |
0106401 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 2006026518 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2006099148 | Sep 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bernard Widrow and John M. McCool, “A Comparison of Adaptive Algorithms Based on the Methods of Steepest Descent and Random Search,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 615-637 (Sep. 1976). |
R. Mudumbai, J. Hespanha, U. Madhow, and G. Barriac, “Scalable Feedback Control for Distributed Beamforming in Sensor Networks,” Proc. 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT 2005), Adelaide, Australia (Sep. 2005). |
“OMRON Develops World-First RFID Technology for Measuring the Distance Between UHF-Band Antenna and IC Tags,” http://www.finanznachrichten.de/nachrichten-2007-09/artikel-8988010.asp. (Sep. 10, 2007). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US08/03438, dated Jun. 12, 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090212921 A1 | Aug 2009 | US |