1. Field of the Invention
The invention generally relates to wall anchors and, more particularly, relates to self-drilling hollow “rock bolts” that are used to reinforce the rock walls of mine openings, tunnels, and the like. The invention additionally relates to methods of fabricating, assembling, and using such rock bolts.
2. Discussion of the Related Art
Mining and tunneling applications often require that the rocks forming the walls of the mine opening or tunnel be reinforced against both the dead weight of the rock, slow deformation and/or sudden bursting. Bolting is the most commonly-used technique for rock reinforcement in underground excavations. Millions of rock bolts are consumed worldwide every year. Basic demands of rock bolts are that they have to be able to bear not only a heavy load, but also must withstand a certain elongation before bolt failure. In highly-stressed rock masses, the rock reacts to excavation either in form of large deformation in weak rocks, or of rock bursting in hard rocks. In these situations, deformation-tolerable (or energy-absorbable) bolts are required in order to achieve good rock reinforcement and reduce the risk of rock fall. Particularly in the mining industry, this need for deformation-tolerable bolts is even stronger than in other rock branches since mining activities are getting deeper and deeper, and problems of rock deformation and rock burst are becoming increasingly severe as the depth increases.
Traditional rock bolts, however, did not provide a good combination of anchoring or load bearing ability and deformability. For example, fully grouted traditional rebar bolts offer very limited elongation (on the order of 30 mm) prior to failure. Traditional frictional bolts provide an unacceptably low load-bearing capacity for many applications, even though they exhibit high deformability.
More recently, a rock bolt has been developed that is locally anchored at one or more discrete locations and that is deformable between the anchors. This bolt, commercially available from Normet under the trade-name D-Bolt®, is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,337,120, the subject matter of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The bolt includes a relatively smooth steel rod with a number of discrete integral anchors along its length. The bolt is anchored in a borehole with either cementitious grout or resin. The bolt is fixed within the surrounding grout primarily at the locations of the anchors, while the smooth sections between the anchors can freely deform when the bolt is subjected to rock dilation. The bolt absorbs the rock dilation energy through fully mobilizing the strength and deformation capacities of the bolt material, typically engineered steel. The smooth sections of a D-Bolt independently provide reinforcement functions to the rock, and failure of one section does not affect the reinforcement function of other sections of the bolt.
The D-Bolt rock bolt offers an excellent combination of deformability and load bearing capacity. However, it does exhibit some disadvantages in some applications.
For example, D-Bolt rock bolts and other rock bolts typically come in standard lengths, requiring that all boreholes be drilled to the same depth or, in the alternative, that different bolts of different, albeit still standard, lengths be kept on-hand to permit some versatility of reinforcement depth.
In addition, a D-Bolt typically must be grouted into a previously-drilled borehole in a three step procedure including borehole drilling, grout insertion, and rock bolt insertion. The grout typically is inserted into the borehole either by being injected directly into the borehole, or by inserting one or more grout-filled cartridges into the borehole. These cartridges are ruptured when the rock bolt is subsequently inserted into the borehole. In either event, the grout is intended to fill the space between the rock bolt and the inner peripheral surface of the borehole and, upon hardening, to lock the rock-bolt to the rock at the local anchors. However, if the rock is highly fractured, debris may form a barrier that prevents the grout from completely filling the gap between the rock bolt and the peripheral surface of the borehole. In addition, some grout takes the form of a two-part resin that must be mixed by rotation of the bolt. Debris in the borehole might hinder adequate resin mixing. In extreme situations, the borehole may effectively collapse upon removal of the drill, preventing subsequent insertion of the grout and/or the rock bolt into the borehole.
Self-drilling rock bolts are known that negate the need to drill the borehole with a separate tool before inserting the rock bolt, eliminating the risk of borehole collapse prior to rock bolt insertion and eliminating or reducing the other detrimental effects of borehole collapse around a rock bolt. The typical self-drilling bolt comes in the form of a hollow tube bearing a sacrificial drill bit at its inner end. The tube is of smaller diameter than the bit so that, upon being drilled into the substrate, a borehole is formed around the bolt. Grout then can be injected into the bolt from its outer end, whereupon the grout flows axially through the bolt, through one or more passages in or near the inner end of the bolt or the sacrificial drill bit, and outwardly between the bolt and the borehole wall to fill the gap.
However, existing self-drilling bolts, including existing self-drilling hollow rock bolts, like the other traditional rock bolts described above, lack local anchors between relatively elongateable bolt sections. Most self-drilling rock bolts instead are threaded or otherwise have relatively small anchors along their entire length and, thus, lack any sections that are more elongateable or, for that matter, offer greater anchoring ability than any other sections. Traditional self-drilling rock bolts thus do not provide an acceptable combination of local anchoring or load bearing ability and elongateability.
The need therefore exists to provide a hollow, self-drilling, locally anchored, elongateable rock-bolt.
The need still additionally exists to provide a hollow, locally anchored, self-drilling rock bolt that is of adjustable length, enhancing greater versatility of borehole depth without increasing inventory requirements.
The need additionally exists to provide a simplified process of installing a locally anchored, hollow, self-drilling rock bolt.
In accordance with a first aspect of the invention, at least one of the above-identified needs is met by providing a hollow, self-drilling rock bolt with at least one intermediate local anchor which is flanked by two relatively deformable shank segments. The rock bolt is grouted to the borehole by grout supplied through the hollow interior of the rock bolt while the rock bolt is in the borehole. Each anchor fixes the bolt to the grout and to the rock mass, whereas the shank segments have a lower anchoring capacity than the local anchors. Looking at the situation another way, the shank segments are relatively “debondable” in comparison to the anchors in that they can slip more easily than the anchor. This ability to slip permits the shank segments to elongate and possibly even yield to accommodate rock fracture. The rock bolt has high capacity in both deformation and load-bearing, yet is self-drilling and can be grouted in place.
The innermost end of the rock bolt may be formed from or bear a drill bit. The drill bit can have dual functions of drilling the bore and serving as the innermost anchor of the bolt.
The local anchors may be of relatively short extent when compared to the shank segments. For example, the ratio of the aggregate axial length of the local anchors to the total length of the bolt may range from 1:2 to 1:50, and more typically of about 1:10 to 1:25. In one example, each intermediate local anchor is about 40 to 80 mm long, and each shank segment is about 500 to 2,500 mm long and more typically 900 to 1,900 mm long. In another example, each intermediate local anchor is about 40 to 80 mm long, and each shank segment is about 1,500 to 3,500 mm long and more typically 2,500 to 2,800 mm long.
Each local anchor may be configured to have an “anchoring” or “holding” force that exceeds the yield load of the rock bolt.
One or more of the shank segments may exhibit uniform debondability along substantially the entirety of its axial extent. For example the shank segments may be of smooth, possibly smooth cylindrical nature.
Alternatively, one or more of the shank segments may exhibit non-uniform debondability along its axial length so one or more portions that slip less easily than one or more other portions so as to provide limited anchoring but less anchoring than that provided by the local anchor(s). For example, a shank segment may have a first portion that is relatively smooth so as to have very high debondability and very low anchoring capacity and one or more portions that are threaded, knurled, bent into a waveform, or otherwise provided with or bear structures imbuing greater anchoring capacity and lower debondability in that portion than in the relatively smooth portion.
In order to provide versatility of bolt length, the bolt may include a tube formed in two or more sections or tubular bodies connected to one another, with each pair of adjacent sections being connected together by a coupler such as sleeve threaded onto or otherwise attached to the ends of the adjacent sections. In this case, each coupler forms an intermediate local anchor, and the sections of the tube between the sleeves or other local anchors form the shank segments.
Instead of being formed from a coupler, an intermediate local anchor could be formed by a section of the hollow bolt that is shaped such as by crimping or expansion. An external anchor also could be attached to the bolt. Any of these alternative anchors could be used alone or in combination with other forms of alternative anchors and/or with couplers.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method of reinforcing a rock wall includes drilling a borehole into the wall with a self-drilling, hollow rock bolt having a drill bit on its inner end, then causing grout to flow through the hollow interior of the rock bolt and through one or more passages in the rock bolt and/or the sacrificial drill bit, and into the borehole. After the grout hardens, the rock bolt is locally anchored to the rock by the drill bit and at least one intermediate anchor located between the drill bit and the outer end of the rock bolt. The anchored bolt can deform by elongation and possibly even yield along a shank segment extending between the drill bit and the intermediate anchor.
The method may additionally include coupling at least tubular bodies together via a coupler prior to or between segments of the drilling operation. In this case, the coupler forms an intermediate local anchor after the grout hardens.
Various other features, embodiments and alternatives of the present invention will be made apparent from the following detailed description taken together with the drawings. It should be understood, however, that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration and not limitation. Many changes and modifications could be made within the scope of the present invention without departing from the spirit thereof, and the invention includes all such modifications.
Preferred exemplary embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals represent like parts throughout, and in which:
Various embodiments of hollow, self-drilling, locally anchored, deformable rock bolts will now be described. The bolts as described herein are designed to reinforce rock, most typically rock walls in underground mines and tunnels. They have high capacity in both deformation and load-bearing. The bolt is particularly-well suited to civil and mining engineering applications that face the problem of large rock deformation or rock burst. The bolt can provide good reinforcement not only in the case of continuous rock deformation (in soft and weak rock masses), but also in the case of local opening of individual rock joints (in blocky rock masses). The opening displacement of a single rock joint will be constrained by the two anchors overriding the joint.
Thus, rock bolts constructed in accordance with the invention have one or more local anchors each flanked by relatively elongateable shank segments. Each local anchor has higher anchoring or holding capacity than the adjacent shank segments. The shank segments may have a higher deformation (elongation) capacity per unit length than the anchors.
The shank segments are relatively debondable when compared to the anchors so as to capable of slipping relative to the hardened grout in the borehole. This slippage capability permits the shank segments to take up local elongation strain between pairs of anchors. When elongating under strain, each shank segment may slip relative to its local borehole perimeter by having a surface released relative to said hardened grout due to diameter reduction due to the so-called Poisson effect. Several techniques could be used to render the shank section relatively debondable when compared to the anchors.
For example, each shank segment could have a smooth, likely cylindrical surface. Each shank segment may be more or less finely ground or polished by techniques like chemical polishing or electropolishing. The surface may further be treated in such a way that the surface of the shank segment has no or negligibly low bonding to the hardened grout. One technique for achieving this goal is to coat the shank segment surface with a thin layer of wax, lacquer, paint or other non-adhesive or lubricant medium.
However, a shank segment need not necessarily be smooth, so long as it is relatively debondable when compared to the anchors. That debondability can be non-uniform along the length of the segment. For example, part or all of a shank segment could be threaded, knurled, roughened, bent into a waveform, or otherwise to provide limited anchoring that is of a lower holding capacity than that of the local anchors. Providing a portion of relatively low debondability and thus relatively high anchoring capacity at the innermost end of the bolt could supplement the anchoring effect of the drill bit or could provide some “fall back” anchoring should the drill bit fall off during the drilling process. Providing such a portion elsewhere on the bolt could provide supplemental anchoring to highly fractured rock.
The local anchor may provide an anchoring force that exceeds the yield load of bolt, which typically is the same as the yield load of the shank segments. For example, depending on the steel employed for the bolt, the inner diameter, and possibly other factors, a 32 mm OD shank segment exhibits a typical yield load between 200 and 300 kN. The anchoring force should exceed that yield load.
In order to provide true local anchoring, the aggregate axial length of the anchors, that is the sum of the axial lengths of the individual anchors, should be considerably less than the aggregate length of the bolt. The ratio of the axial length of the local anchors to the total length of the bolt may range from 1:2 to 1:50, and more typically of about 1:10 to 1:25.
The local anchors may advantageously be hardened so as to prevent from being deformed while being loaded while fixed in the hardened grout, and to prevent them from being ground down if they slide in the hardened grout. The local anchors may also be threaded on exterior surface, both to increase the anchoring effect and to enable mounting of a threaded nut at the rock face end of the bolt that secures a face plate or the like in place.
In each of the embodiments described below, the bolt includes a hollow metal tube with a drill bit threaded or otherwise mounted directly onto the bolt at its inner end. The drill bit or may act as an anchor, and a nut/plate assembly on the rock surface and the associated threads may also act as an anchor. At least one discrete intermediate local anchor is provided between the drill bit and the nut/plate assembly, and anchors may also be provided on each end of the bolt. Relatively elongateable shanks sections are provided between the local anchors. The shank sections preferably have a higher debondability and thus a lower anchoring capacity than the local anchors. The grouting takes place after the entire bolt, which may be comprised of several bolt sections, is installed in the borehole. The grout is injected or pumped through the axial bore in the tube, out of passages in the tube and/or the drill bit, and around the length of the tube. Upon hardening of the grout, the bolt can locally deform to absorb energy during rock deformation, but offers all of the advantages of a self-drilling hollow rock bolt, most notably negating the need to drill a borehole in potentially relatively unstable rock, then insert a separate bolt in the borehole, and then grout the bolt in place.
Turning now to
Each shank segment 22A-22D has much lower anchoring ability or, stated another way, a higher debondability, than the anchors 16A-16C, 18, and 20. These segments 22A-22D may be smooth to the extent that they lack threads or other external protrusions or indentations. They also may be polished to further reduce their fiction. For example, each shank segment 22A-22D may be more or less finely ground or polished by techniques such as chemical polishing or electropolishing. The surface may further be treated in such a way that the surface of the shank segment has no or negligibly low bonding to the hardened grout. One technique for achieving this goal is to coat the shank segment surface with a thin layer of wax, lacquer, paint or other non-adhesive or lubricant medium. The shank segments also could be surface-treated to reduce their binding affinity for the hardened grout. For example, a metal oxide layer could be deposited on the shank segments. Alternatively, a portion or all of one or more of the shank segments could have limited anchoring capacity that exceeds that of a smooth portion but that is substantially lower than that provided by the local anchors. A tubular body having such an anchoring capacity is discussed below in conjunction with
The bolt 10 of this embodiment is about 3.5 meters long, and has four tubular bolt segments or bodies 14A-14D, each of which is externally threaded at both ends. The threads on at least the outer end of the outermost tubular body 14D, and preferably all threads, should be at least as strong as the steel tube or even stronger. Therefore, the nominal diameter of the threads should be larger than the diameter of the remainder of the tubular body so that the effective diameter of the threads is equal to or larger than the diameter of the adjacent shank segment. It is also possible to conduct special metallurgical treatment to each threaded portion, included the work hardening process that occurs during roll-threading, so that its strength is made higher than the adjacent shank segment. The deformation capacity of the threads per se is not particularly relevant. It is, however, desirable that the threads have a chance to get into yielding. This increases the ultimate deformation of the shank segment prior to failure.
The three innermost tubular bodies 14A-14C of this embodiment are of the same or similar length, and the fourth, outermost tubular body 14D is considerably shorter. It should be emphasized that more or fewer tubular bodies could be provided in any particular installation, permitting anchoring in borehole depths of a variety of multiples of the length of each tubular body. Hence, the bolt 10 could be used in a 4.5 meter deep borehole simply by adding another tubular body to the tube 12 between, for example, tubular bodies 14C and 14D. Alternatively, bolt 10 could be used in a 2.5 meter deep borehole simply by removing a tubular body such as tubular body 14B from the tube 12. The lengths of each tubular body 14A-14D and thus the length of each shank segment 22A-22B and/or the lengths of the local anchors 16A-16C, 18, and 20 could vary considerably based on designer preference and on the intended application, so long as the aggregate length of the local anchors is of relatively short extent when compared to the aggregate length of the bolt 10. In the illustrated embodiment, the aggregate axial length of the local anchors, including the couplers 16A-16C, the drill bit 18, and the portion of threaded outer end of the bolt that is imbedded in the grout, is about 250 mm. This results in a ratio of anchor length to bolt length of about 1:14. Ratios between 1:10 and 1:25, and even between 1:2 and 1:50, would be well within the scope of the invention. The length of each intermediate coupler 16A-16C of this embodiment is about 50 mm, and the length of each of the three innermost shank segments 22A-22C is about 950 mm, resulting in ratio of the length of each of the coupler 16A and 16B to either of the two adjacent shank segments of 1:19. Ratios between 1:10 and 1:30 and even between 1:2 and 1:50, would be well within the scope of the invention.
Referring to
One of the couplers 16B is illustrated in
Referring to
Still referring to
Referring again to
It should be noted that one or more of the couplers could be mounted on the tubular bodies 14A-14D other than solely by threading. For example, referring to
One or more of the intermediate anchors could take the form of anchors other than couplers connecting individual tubular bodies together, negating the need for a multi-section bolt at the cost of reduced borehole length design versatility and/or increased bolt inventory. One or more of these other types of local anchors also could be provided between existing coupler locations. These other types of local anchors could take any of a variety of forms, and different types of anchors could be provided on the same bolt.
For example, one or more of the intermediate anchors could be formed simply by crimping or otherwise shaping a section of the tube. For example, an intermediate anchor 216A could be formed by expanding a section of a tubular body 214 as shown in
Alternately, one or more intermediate anchors could be formed by flattening the tubular body in one direction and enlarging the direction orthogonal to that direction. Such an anchor 316A is shown in
As still another example, one or more of the intermediate anchors could take the form of an external anchor. Such an anchor is shown in
As mentioned above, the shank segment of a particular tubular body need not be smooth along its entire length. It instead may be desirable and even preferable to imbue part or all of the shank segment with limited anchoring capacity, albeit less than that provided by the local anchors. Most typically, this type of shank segment will exhibit non-uniform debondability, and thus non-uniform anchoring capacity, along its axial length.
One such tubular body 514 is illustrated in
The shank segment 522 is of non-uniform debondability along its length. That is, at least one portion of the shank segment 522 is imbued with lower debondability and resultant higher anchoring capacity than one or more other portions of the segments in order, for example, to supplement the anchoring effect of existing local anchors, to act as a fallback in the event of the absence of a local anchor, and/or to provide supplemental anchoring to highly fractured rock. The shank segment 522 of this embodiment has three portions of differing debondability. An intermediate portion 522A of maximum debondability, and thus having minimal anchoring capacity, is disposed between two portions 522B and 522C that have reduced debondability, and thus increased anchoring capacity, when compared to portion 522A. Each portion 522B and 522C is threaded, knurled, bent into a waveform, and/or otherwise provided with or bear structures imbuing greater anchoring capacity in that portion than in the smooth portion 522A. Portions 522B and 522C are bent into waveforms in this particular example. In this exemplary embodiment in which the body 514 is slated to bear a drill bit on its inner threaded portion, inner portion 522B is designed to have significant anchoring capacity (though far less than that of the local anchors described above) in order to supplement the anchoring effect of the drill bit or to provide some “fall back” anchoring should the drill bit fall off during the drilling process. Portion 522B therefore extends a significant portion of the length of the shank segment 522. In the illustrated example in which the shank segment 522 is 2,700 mm long, the portion 522B may have a typical length of 1,000 mm to 2,000 mm and more typically of about 1,300 mm. The outer portion 522C of shank segment 522 is provided to supplement the anchoring effect of the coupler that is to be mounted onto the threaded inner end 526B of tubular body 514. It is therefore relative short when compared to portion 522B, namely on the order of 200 mm to 400 mm and specifically 300 mm in this embodiment. The intermediate portion 522A takes up the remainder of the length of the shank segment 522 or 1,100 mm in the illustrated embodiment.
It must be stressed that the styles, number, and extent of portions of differing debondability that fall within the present invention are virtually limitless.
Multi-section rock bolts constructed as described above, or other rock bolts constructed in accordance with the invention, could be installed using the process 600 schematically illustrated by
Process 600 begins with block 602, where the rock bolt 10 is assembled by attaching the drill bit 18 to the inner end of a first tubular body 14A of the tube 12, and the bolt 10 may be assembled to the desired length by connecting at least one additional tubular body to that body 14A via a coupler 16A. The second tubular body may be a relatively short body corresponding to the outermost tubular body 14D of
The outer end of the bolt 10 or a bolt section is then attached to a drill, and the bolt or a bolt section is then drilled into a rock surface in block 604 to form a borehole with the bolt 10 inserted into it with the bit 18 at the inner end of the borehole and the outer end of the bolt 10 protruding from the outer end of the borehole. If additional sections of the bolt are required, these additional sections are assembled onto the previous sections through the use of the coupler/anchor sections, and the drilling process is repeated until all the sections have been assembled and drilled. Water may be pumped through the hollow bore 24 of the tube 12 and out of the outer end of the borehole during and/or after the drilling process to flush drill cuttings from the borehole. The bolt 10 is now inserted into a borehole having a diameter approximately equal to that of the largest diameter of the drill bit 18. The borehole is sufficiently wide to provide a clearance between the bolt, including the relatively wide couplers 16A-16C, and the periphery of the borehole of sufficient diameter to permit grout to flow between the bolt 10 and the periphery of the borehole along the entire length of the bolt 10.
Next, in block 606, the bolt 10 is grouted in place without removing the bolt from the borehole. The grout may be any grout used in the mining or tunneling industries. It may, for example, be a cementitious material or a multi-component resin such as two-part epoxy resin, mixed before entering the tube 12. The grout is injected, pumped, or otherwise supplied into the hollow bore 24 of tube 12 from its open outer end and flows axially through the hollow bore 24, out of the inner end of the innermost tubular body 14A, out of the passages 44 in the drill bit 18, and then into the borehole adjacent the inner end of bolt 10. The grout then flows outwardly through the borehole so as to fill the gap between the bolt and the periphery of the borehole. If needed or desired, a standard coned sleeve may be placed around the bolt near the face end of the borehole to prevent grout from pouring out of the borehole and thus ensure more complete grouting. If the grout is a multi-component resin, resin mixing can be enhanced by turning the bolt in the borehole during this process. Because the rock bolt 10 remains within the borehole, the chances of borehole collapse are eliminated or at least sharply reduced. This will prevent or at least inhibit debris from blocking the flow of grout through the gap between the bolt 10 and the periphery of the borehole and along the depth of the borehole. The bolt 10 is grouted in place after the grout hardens. The bolt 10 now is locally anchored to the rock at the locations of the discrete local anchors formed by the drill bit 18 and the intermediate anchor(s) 16A, 16B, etc. as well as the threads on the outer end of the outermost tubular body 14D.
The nut and washer, sheave, or face plate assembly 60 is then threaded onto the rock and in place near block 608 using the threads on the outer end of the tubular body 14D, or alternatively the threads on the outermost coupler, as in coupler 116A′.
The resulting rock bolt has at least two smooth shank segments and at least two discrete local anchors, with at least one of the anchors being an intermediate anchor flanked by two shank segments. Thus, the rock bolt will be attached firmly to the rock at a multiplicity of spaced borehole locations along the length of the bolt and constrain rock deformation. Pre-tensioning of the bolt may prevent or delay initial crack formation and may also provide an earlier constraining of the rock mantle. The rock bolt will be useful for constraining rock deformation both due to both long-term deformation and rock burst.
The installed bolt 10 is shown as anchored within a borehole 702 in a wall 700 in
Post-bolt installation rock deformation will primarily load the bolt 10 through the anchors 18, 16A, and 20. The shank segments 22A and 22B between each pair of adjacent anchors, in turn, will be stretched and elongated. Under extremely high loads, one or more of the shank segments 22A, 22B will yield. Such an event is shown in
In some cases, for instance in conjunction with a relatively weak grout, the anchors could even slide a bit within the grout without a significant loss of reinforcement. Because of these two mechanisms, the bolt 10 and other bolts constructed in accordance with the invention can tolerate a large elongation on the order of more than 10% to more than 15% over a 100 mm sample length, and even more than 20% over a 100 mm sample length, depending on the characteristics of the material, while at the same time bearing a load equivalent to the yield load of the bolt. In fact, bolt 10 and other bolts constructed in accordance with the invention utilize the capacity of the steel material in both its deformation capacity and strength. If the bolt has two or more anchors including at least one intermediate anchor between the drill bit and the outer plate, the rock anchoring effect of the bolt is assured within segments between the anchors. A loss of anchoring at an individual anchor only locally affects the reinforcement effect of the bolt. On the whole, the bolt would still work well with a loss of one or more individual local anchors, as long as one or more anchors are fixed in the borehole.
Although the best modes contemplated by the inventor of carrying out the present invention is disclosed above, practice of the present invention is not limited thereto. It will be manifest that various additions, modifications and rearrangements of the aspects and features of the present invention may be made in addition to those described above without deviating from the spirit and scope of the underlying inventive concept. The scope of some of these changes is discussed above. The scope of other changes to the described embodiments that fall within the present invention but that are not specifically discussed above will become apparent from the appended claims and other attachments.
This application claims priority under 35 USC §1.119(e) to earlier U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/158,656, filed May 8, 2015 and entitled LOCALLY ANCHORED SELF-DRILLING HOLLOW ROCK BOLT, the contents of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3837258 | Williams | Sep 1974 | A |
4160615 | Baldwin | Jul 1979 | A |
4431348 | Powondra | Feb 1984 | A |
4704053 | Hipkins, Sr. | Nov 1987 | A |
4798501 | Spies | Jan 1989 | A |
4861197 | Calandra, Jr. | Aug 1989 | A |
4938631 | Maechtle et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4954017 | Davis | Sep 1990 | A |
5042961 | Scott | Aug 1991 | A |
5052861 | Hipkins, Sr. | Oct 1991 | A |
5256016 | Godfrey | Oct 1993 | A |
5273377 | Taylor | Dec 1993 | A |
5314268 | Calandra, Jr. | May 1994 | A |
5378087 | Locotos | Jan 1995 | A |
5387060 | Locotos | Feb 1995 | A |
5433558 | Gray | Jul 1995 | A |
5511909 | Calandra, Jr. | Apr 1996 | A |
5667011 | Gill | Sep 1997 | A |
5775849 | Sorkin | Jul 1998 | A |
5829922 | Calandra, Jr. | Nov 1998 | A |
5984588 | Ferrari | Nov 1999 | A |
6012874 | Groneck | Jan 2000 | A |
6270290 | Stankus | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6447228 | Fergusson | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6652195 | Vickars | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6679335 | Slack | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685236 | Setterberg, Jr. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7037046 | Fergusson | May 2006 | B2 |
7896580 | Weaver et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8142109 | Schmidt | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8337120 | Li | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8434970 | Gaudry et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8851802 | Weaver et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8899883 | Champaigne et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20030075338 | Sivley, IV | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20050156127 | Fergusson | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060067795 | Spearing et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070183850 | Hedrick | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20100202838 | Weaver et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110103896 | Horsch | May 2011 | A1 |
20130028667 | Champaigne et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140020911 | Martinez | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2003204831 | Jan 2004 | AU |
202117696 | Jan 2012 | CN |
35 04 543 | May 1986 | DE |
34 00 182 | Jul 1989 | DE |
37 17 024 | Oct 1989 | DE |
41 28 154 | Aug 1991 | DE |
44 45 626 | Jun 1996 | DE |
44 43 131 | Jul 2001 | DE |
100 52 306 | May 2002 | DE |
101 31 818 | Feb 2003 | DE |
42 20 636 | Jul 2004 | DE |
10 2009 056 089 | Jun 2011 | DE |
1 533 471 | May 2005 | EP |
2 094 944 | Jan 2010 | EP |
2 354 448 | Aug 2011 | EP |
02-210199 | Aug 1990 | JP |
2004106700 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2011020144 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011149420 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2014064653 | May 2014 | WO |
2015003726 | Jan 2015 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160326873 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62158656 | May 2015 | US |