1. Field
The invention is a method and system for providing location based presence status and enhancing location privacy management in mobile, social networking and instant messaging environments.
2. Description of the Related Art
Location based services (LBS) have been on the wireless carrier product roadmaps for several years, however there has been limited mainstream adoption of such services, and much of the infrastructure and systems have been put in place to meet the emergency services (E-911) mandates.
With the advancements in Global Positioning System (GPS) technology for mobile devices, the accuracy of mobile positioning systems has improved significantly, and consumer LBS applications such as real-time navigation using mobile devices are now available on selected mobile devices offered by carriers. However, both carriers and consumers are concerned about consumer privacy and liability issues involved with offering and enabling such applications.
A significant percentage of mobile phones sold today are enabled with a GPS chip, which can determine the precise location of the user. While users are given the ability to turn off location tracking on their mobile devices for all location based applications with the exception of E-911 services, this results in the user not being able to take advantage of any location based services.
Location based presence, messaging and mobile social networking applications require users to share their location coordinates, however due to privacy concerns many users don't take advantage of such services. Some of the location based applications offer ability to share location coordinates by user or a group of users, and/or restrict sharing location information at the city or zip code level. However, in order to convey location information related to a subscriber's presence at a precise and specific location, such as the subscriber's home or work, or a business or point of interest, the subscriber has to share their location coordinates or address information with other users and/or applications.
Further, the process of updating presence status with other users in a mobile instant messaging environment imposes additional challenges compared to the desktop instant messaging environment. Particularly, due to the battery, memory, processing and screen size limitations of the mobile devices, current mobile instant messaging applications drain the battery of the mobile device in the process of sending real time updates of the presence information of the entire buddy list.
Also, several mobile location-based and social networking applications require a mapping interface to display the mobile user's location. Due to bandwidth constraints of the mobile network, and the memory, processing capability and battery limitations of the mobile device, delivering mapping information on mobile networks adds additional costs and complexity limiting the adoption of such applications.
In most instances, what users really need is the ability to share location contextual information about their presence at specific locations (such as home, office, school, etc.) where they spend most of their time, and selectively sharing their location coordinates with other users when requested by the user or as the need arises. The invention provides users an option to share location contextual information related to user-specified locations by using generic or user-specified location names, graphical indicators and/or location category information, and further provide location based presence status to other users of instant messaging applications without sharing their location coordinates or address information.
In other instances, when users are at a business or a point of interest such as a restaurant, library, golf course, etc., the invention enables the mobile user to indicate their presence status based on the category of that location, (e.g., restaurant, golf course, library, etc.) and optionally based on the business or POI name without sharing location coordinates with other users.
In other instances when the user is driving, the invention enables the mobile user to indicate their presence status as driving to convey they are not at their regular locations such as home or work, and provide location contextual information based on geographical area or proximity to user-specified locations without sharing their location coordinates and without offering location tracking capability to other users.
Such location contextual information and location based presence status, in most instances, enables the calling or messaging party to become aware of the user's availability status, and can be broadly shared with all contacts, while significantly mitigating concerns about privacy and liability related to tracking user's location coordinates.
Another embodiment of the invention is to group users and/or location privacy options into multiple, numerically or descriptively labeled, location privacy or location sharing levels, wherein one of the levels is based on sharing location contextual status at precise locations using generic or user-specified location names, location status indicators, or location category information, without sharing location coordinates or address information of the user.
Another aspect of the invention is to enable an efficient and optimal method of updating location based presence status with a large number of contacts in a mobile and instant messaging environment. Other features of the invention will be apparent from the description, the drawings and the claims.
Foregoing aspects of the invention will become better understood by referring to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
a is an exemplary classification of location contextual information into multiple, numerically and descriptively labeled, location sharing levels.
b is an exemplary table for associating location contextual name types with corresponding sharing levels.
a is an exemplary table for storing user-specified locations and corresponding criteria for sharing location contextual information when user is at this location.
b is an exemplary table for storing user's favorite business and POI locations and corresponding criteria for sharing location contextual information.
In particular, the communication system 100 is capable of detecting or receiving geographic location information of a user's mobile phone or other associated terminal or device. In one implementation, the mobile carrier network 110 includes a mobile positioning system 112 that is capable of determining location coordinates of the mobile phones 120a and 120b. The mobile positioning system 112 may receive the location coordinates from the Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver embedded in the mobile phone 120a or 120b, and in another implementation assist the mobile phone 120a or 120b in determining its location using one or more of the mobile positioning methods including Assisted (A-GPS), Time Difference of Arrival (TDOA), or other approaches that provide location coordinates within specified constraints of accuracy. In one implementation, the mobile positioning system 112 includes a location server which may be a Gateway Mobile Location Center (GMLC) in case of GSM networks or a Mobile Positioning Center (MPC) in case of CDMA networks, which provides the user's location information to third party location application servers implementing location based services and applications.
The mobile carrier network 110 also includes a mobile messaging system 114 that is capable of transmitting text or data messages from and to the mobile phones 120a or 120b, which may include image, audio or video messages, and may use one or more of the mobile data messaging services and protocols including Short Messaging Service (SMS), Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS), Wireless Application Protocol (WAP) or other Internet Protocol (IP) based data and application-layer protocols used in third generation (3G) mobile standards, such as, for example, Session Initiation Protocol (SIP). The mobile carrier network 110 may include any of the underlying RF transport protocols, such as, for example, General Packet Radio Service (GPRS), Enhanced Data rates for GSM Evolution (EDGE), Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA), CDMA 2000 1x-RTT, CDMA 1x-EV-DO, or any of the 3G or 4G mobile standards.
The mobile phones 120a and 120b are exemplary mobile devices used by two different mobile subscribers, which may be on the same mobile carrier network, or may be part of different mobile carrier networks. The mobile phones 120a or 120b include an address book 122a or 122b, a location client application 124a or 124b, one or more mobile messaging applications 126a or 126b which may include a text messaging application, a multimedia messaging application, an email application, and/or an instant messaging application.
The public IM network 130 comprises of instant messaging (IM) services such as those offered by MSN, AOL, Yahoo, or Google, and may be based on proprietary implementations or based on industry standards such as Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) or Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP). The public IM client 132 may be a desktop or mobile IM client subscribing to a public IM network 130.
The enterprise IM network 140 comprises of instant messaging services provided by companies and large enterprises to their corporate users for a controlled and managed access to instant messaging services. The enterprise IM clients 142 may be a desktop or mobile IM client subscribing to an enterprise IM network 140.
a illustrates an exemplary implementation of grouping various types of location contextual information into multiple, numeric and descriptively labeled location sharing levels. Further, one of the sharing levels enables sharing location contextual names of user-specified locations without sharing location coordinates of the user. In one implementation, the invention enables a mobile user to select location sharing options and select or specify descriptive names for location sharing levels 0 to 3 as described in table 210. As shown in table 210, the location contextual information options at a particular sharing level are in addition to the options available at the previous sharing level. As shown in field 212, at level 0, no location information is shared. As shown in field 214, at level 1, only city and state level information is shared by default, with options to select zip or area level names. As shown in field 216, at level 2, location contextual information corresponding to precise user-specified geographic locations is shared when user is at or near these locations, without providing street address or location coordinates of the user. Location contextual information may include names, categories and representative graphical indicators of user-specified locations and user-specified business or POI locations, and optionally categories of other non-specified business or POI locations, such as, for example, home, office, work, school, restaurant, golf course, library, etc. The user may also specify the option to include business or POI names when user is at non-specified business or POI locations. As shown in field 218, at level 3, all relevant location information may be shared with selected users at this level including street name, nearest intersection, business and POI names and/or categories as specified by the user. Location coordinates and street address are also shared if an authorized user at this level requests location coordinates or other location information that requires sharing such information such as, for example, directions to mobile subscriber's current location.
b is an exemplary table for associating location contextual name types and corresponding sharing levels. As represented in table 220, the default settings for location name types and corresponding sharing levels are specified, along with the configuration options for sharing levels that maybe specified by the user. As represented in field 221, location names based on city and state are available for sharing with users at sharing level 1 or higher. As represented by field 222, when user is at or near user-specified locations, location contextual information based on location names and categories of these locations are available for sharing with users at sharing level 2 or higher, without providing location coordinates or street address information of the mobile subscriber's current location. As represented in field 223, user-specified POI names, which also include user-specified business names, will be available for sharing at level 2 or above. As shown in the configuration options, user may change the minimum sharing level for this location name type to level 3. As shown in field 224, the business or POI category information will be available for sharing with users at level 2 or above, when the mobile subscriber is determined to be at a business or POI location. The mobile subscriber may change the minimum sharing level for this location name type to level 3. Further, as shown in fields 225 and 226, location contextual information may also include street name and nearest intersection of their current location when sharing with users at level 3. The mobile subscriber may change the sharing level for this location name type to sharing level 2 or higher. As represented in field 227, business or POI names corresponding to user's current location, when user is determined to be at a location that is a business or POI will also be available for sharing with users at sharing level 3. The mobile subscriber may change the sharing level for this location name type to sharing level 2 or higher.
Additionally, mobile subscribers may select level 1 or level 2 as their default location sharing level for sharing with all users who request location status or are in the contacts list. In one implementation, any user can request and receive the mobile subscriber's location status corresponding to the default location sharing level, and the location application server only updates location status with a subset of users corresponding to the higher sharing levels, thus providing an efficient and optimal way for sharing location based presence status with a large number of users. In another implementation, location status corresponding to the default sharing level 1 or 2 is shared with the public IM network with an option to request location status corresponding to higher sharing levels, which may then be provided automatically if the contact is an authorized user at the higher sharing level, or the request may be sent for approval to the mobile subscriber.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
It is also noted that while the above describes the exemplifying embodiments of the invention, those skilled in the art would appreciate several variations and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as described in the following claims.
This application is a continuation of, and claims priority of, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/838,876, filed Aug. 14, 2007. The subject matter of this earlier-filed application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5946647 | Miller et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6055513 | Katz et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6057872 | Candelore | May 2000 | A |
6101484 | Halbert et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6157841 | Bolduc et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6269343 | Pallakoff | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6295528 | Marcus et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6381303 | Vu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385458 | Papadimitriou et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400956 | Richton | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6442391 | Johansson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442530 | Miller | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446004 | Cao et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452498 | Stewart | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6505123 | Root et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6542820 | Lamance et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6556975 | Wittsche | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560534 | Abraham et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6587835 | Treyz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611751 | Warren | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6631404 | Philyaw | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647257 | Owensby | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6651000 | Van Diggelen et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6668167 | McDowell et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6754585 | Root et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6756882 | Benes et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6756917 | Gould et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760046 | I'Anson et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6760601 | Suoknuuti et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6763299 | Jones | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6763300 | Jones | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764003 | Martschitsch et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6788766 | Logan | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6826617 | Ansell et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829535 | Van Diggelen et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836730 | Root et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6839554 | McDowell et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847959 | Arrouye et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6850837 | Paulaskas et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6868396 | Smith et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871140 | Florance et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6873997 | Majjasie et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6912398 | Domnitz | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6912517 | Agnihotri et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6931254 | Egner et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6937998 | Swartz et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6944467 | Ala-Luukko | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944679 | Parupudi et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947976 | Devitt et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6954633 | Metternich et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6954697 | Smith | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6957393 | Fano et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6965868 | Bednarek | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6965872 | Grdina | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6973322 | Buchmann et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6973438 | Philyaw | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6975872 | Cheng | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6983146 | Spratt | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6985813 | Root et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6988037 | Root et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6992617 | Diggelen et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996402 | Logan et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6996579 | Leung et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7071842 | Brady, Jr. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7092964 | Dougherty et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7116985 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7206568 | Sudit | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7219303 | Fish | May 2007 | B2 |
7224978 | Zellner et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7224987 | Bhela et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7236799 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7237201 | Fish | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7242946 | Kokkonen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7245925 | Zellner | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7266443 | Hirose | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7315259 | Sacks | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7352322 | Tsujimoto et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7412400 | Bhela et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7417544 | Artem et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7418267 | Karaoguz | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7418451 | Leung et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7418503 | Zellner et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7426436 | Van Watermulen et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7532900 | Wilson et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7589628 | Brady, Jr. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7628704 | Uhlir et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7761414 | Freedman | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8046721 | Chaudhri et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8068857 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8070608 | Uhlir et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8074172 | Kocienda et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8126889 | Pitt | Feb 2012 | B2 |
20020002504 | Engel et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020035605 | McDowell et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020065111 | Otsuka et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020067308 | Robertson | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077130 | Owensby | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091568 | Kraft et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020102993 | Hendrey et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111172 | DeWolf et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020188589 | Salmenkaita et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198851 | Hashimoto et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030055983 | Callegari | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060214 | Hendrey et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030078053 | Abtin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093314 | Leung et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030207683 | Lempio et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220835 | Barnes, Jr. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229592 | Florance et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040023666 | Moon et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040036622 | Dukach et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040111335 | Black et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040192351 | Duncan | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203561 | Jakubowski | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203879 | Gardner et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203888 | Mikan | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203901 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203922 | Hines et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050027437 | Takenaga et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050027608 | Wiesmuller et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050085952 | Park et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096013 | Lehikoinen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050096040 | Haberman et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050144291 | Frank et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050153729 | Logan et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165788 | Yang et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177416 | Linden | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050202832 | Sudit | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050227711 | Orwant et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050250517 | Fukui et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261001 | Marley et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050272413 | Bourne | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020508 | Gorti et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060022048 | Johnson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046744 | Dublish et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060116817 | Salmre et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135177 | Winterbottom et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060218151 | Adelman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060253453 | Chmaytelli et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277290 | Shank | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070019587 | Okamoto et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070037610 | Logan | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070042788 | Duan | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070042789 | Moton et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047479 | Shaffer et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049287 | Dunn | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049288 | Lamprecht et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049289 | Woo | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049292 | Emond | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049293 | Russell | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060171 | Sudit et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072619 | Wei et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072621 | Mukkavilli et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072625 | Fournier et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072626 | Babu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070077939 | Uematsu et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070077942 | Heaven et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070077943 | Hamilla | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070080830 | Sacks | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070082668 | Silver et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070082680 | Fish | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070082681 | Kim et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070082682 | Kim et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091838 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093257 | McDougall et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070096900 | Contractor | May 2007 | A1 |
20070099625 | Rosenfeld | May 2007 | A1 |
20070099627 | Kofol et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070105565 | Enzmann et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070105566 | Sharony et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070117571 | Musial | May 2007 | A1 |
20070117572 | Adam et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070117573 | Kennedy et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129082 | Thacher | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070129083 | Creamer et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135136 | Ische | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142059 | Wang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142060 | Moton et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149208 | Syrbe et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149210 | McKiou et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149211 | Dunn et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149212 | Gupta et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149213 | Lamba et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149214 | Walsh et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149216 | Misikangas | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070155399 | Alberth et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070155400 | Madsen | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070159322 | Campbell et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070161381 | Chen et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070161382 | Melinger et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070161401 | Sheynblat | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162582 | Belali et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167170 | Fitchett et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167171 | Bishop | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168127 | Zaruba et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168524 | Chao et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185768 | Vengroff et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070233385 | Dicke et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080071749 | Schloter | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080132251 | Altman et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147546 | Weichselbaumer et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080172173 | Chang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080209332 | Chevsky et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080214161 | Jakl | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080242231 | Gray | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080248810 | Obradovich | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080252517 | Fuchs et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266324 | Lynch et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080288545 | Hegedus et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080299900 | Lesyna | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316091 | Wigren et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006480 | Fuchs et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090009397 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090009398 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090033553 | Tusjimoto et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090042584 | Nagata et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043491 | Haatainen | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090047972 | Neeraj | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090063304 | Meggs | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082024 | Elliott | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090098880 | Lindquist | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090176475 | Salkini et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090278738 | Gopinath | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100017874 | Piccinini et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100020776 | Youssef et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100280874 | Thorn | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110077046 | Durand et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110238517 | Ramalingam et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120046051 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120276926 | Pitt | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284105 | Li | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 418 784 | May 2004 | EP |
2002354522 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003161771 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003344092 | Dec 2003 | JP |
2005323404 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2007-51869 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2010539738 | Dec 2010 | JP |
10-2005-0004662 | Jan 2005 | KR |
10-2005-0014940 | May 2005 | KR |
10-2007-0053539 | May 2007 | KR |
Entry |
---|
“CardStar iPhone App Wrangles Multiple Membership Cards,” written by Dong Ngo on May 15, 2009, http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938—105-10241727-1.html (last accessed May 22, 2013). |
Apple Store POS Handhelds forum posts from Sep. 25, 2008, through Sep. 28, 2013, http://www.everythingcafe.com/forum/threads,apple-store-pos-handhelds.32824 (last accessed May 22, 2013). |
Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/052,193 on Jun. 18, 2013. |
Final Office Action received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/069,380 on Apr. 22, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,216 on Mar. 15, 2013. |
Office Action issued in related Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-521129 on Feb. 4, 2013. English translation provided on pp. 6-9. |
“Non-Final Office Action” issued on Nov. 1, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/923,722. |
Non-Final Office Action of Oct. 30, 2013, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,217. |
Office Action issued in related Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-521129 on Dec. 3, 2013. No translation. |
Extended European Search Report issued on May 29, 2012, for European Application No. 08797761.7. |
Marshall M McLeod, “Final Office Action”, dated Jul. 9, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,217. |
Office Action (Non-Final) from U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,217 dated Dec. 20, 2011. |
Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,216 on Dec. 28, 2012. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,217 dated Nov. 29, 2012. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/069,380 dated Nov. 29, 2012. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/052,193 on Jan. 2, 2013. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2008/072977 mailed Jan. 30, 2009 (corresponds with PCT application for U.S. Appl. No. 11/838,876). |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/838,876 dated Oct. 19, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/838,876 dated Mar. 24, 2011. |
Nov. 22, 2011 International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2011/028734. |
Oct. 25, 2011 International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2011/028566. |
An Exploration on Mobile Social Networking: Dodgeball as a Case in Point, Nina Ziv et al., Mobile Business, 2006, ICMB '06, International Conference of IEEE Computer Society, p. 21, XP031056542, DOI: 10.1109/ICMB.2006.8, ISBN: 978-0-7695-2595-2 (Jun. 1, 2006). |
“Mobile Context Inference using Low-Cost Sensors”, Evan Welbourne et al., Lecture Notes in Computer Science—LNCS, Springer, DE, vol. 3479, pp. 254-263, XP007915205, ISSN: 0302-9743 (Jan. 1, 2005). |
“Modular Bayesian Networks for Inferring Landmarks on Mobile Daily Life”, Keum-Sung Hwang et al., AI 2006: Advances in Artificial Intelligence Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, LNCS, Springer, Berlin, DE, pp. 929-933, XP019052024, ISBN: 978-3-540-49787-5 (Jan. 1, 2006). |
“WatchMe: Communication and Awareness between members of a Closely-Knit Group”, Natalia Marmasse et al., UbiComp 2004: Ubiquitous Computing: 6th International Conference, Nottingham, UK, Sep. 7-10, 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3205 (Nov. 2, 2004). |
Final Office Action dated May 9, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,217. |
Non-Final Office Action issued on Jul. 27, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,216. |
Doan, “Non- Final Office Action” issued on Nov. 1, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/923,722. |
Katherine Kolosowski-Gager, “Non-Final Office Action” issued on Jul. 14, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/052,193. |
Kiet M.Doan, Real-time Location and Presence using a Push-Location client and server, U.S. Appl. No. 13/923,722. |
Marshall M. McLeod, “System for Sharing Favorites and Enabling In-Network Local Search Based on Network Rankings”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,217. |
Notice of Allowance Issued on Apr. 1, 2014, in JP Application No. 2010-521129, which corresponds to U.S. Appl. No. 11/838,876. |
Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/923,722 on Sep. 10, 2014. |
Kiet M. Doan, “Notice of Allowance” issued on Oct. 14, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/923,722. |
Phouc Huu Doan, “Non-Final Office Action” issued on Oct. 21, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/056,477. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120009900 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11838876 | Aug 2007 | US |
Child | 13241048 | US |