Location based presence and privacy management

Abstract
A method and system for providing location based presence status and enhancing location privacy management in a mobile, instant messaging or social networking environment. A user specifies or saves their favorite locations (e.g. home, work, school, or particular business or point of interest locations), and specifies or selects names and/or categories to be shared for each user-specified location. In addition, the system provides multiple sharing levels for sharing multiple types of location contextual information. When user's current location corresponds to user-specified locations, location based presence status is provided to specified contacts according to the sharing level settings, and provides user the option to share location contextual information without sharing location coordinates of the user. When user is driving, location based presence status is updated accordingly, and when user is at other business or POI locations, corresponding location contextual information is shared based on user's settings for each sharing level.
Description
BACKGROUND

1. Field


The invention is a method and system for providing location based presence status and enhancing location privacy management in mobile, social networking and instant messaging environments.


2. Description of the Related Art


Location based services (LBS) have been on the wireless carrier product roadmaps for several years, however there has been limited mainstream adoption of such services, and much of the infrastructure and systems have been put in place to meet the emergency services (E-911) mandates.


With the advancements in Global Positioning System (GPS) technology for mobile devices, the accuracy of mobile positioning systems has improved significantly, and consumer LBS applications such as real-time navigation using mobile devices are now available on selected mobile devices offered by carriers. However, both carriers and consumers are concerned about consumer privacy and liability issues involved with offering and enabling such applications.


A significant percentage of mobile phones sold today are enabled with a GPS chip, which can determine the precise location of the user. While users are given the ability to turn off location tracking on their mobile devices for all location based applications with the exception of E-911 services, this results in the user not being able to take advantage of any location based services.


Location based presence, messaging and mobile social networking applications require users to share their location coordinates, however due to privacy concerns many users don't take advantage of such services. Some of the location based applications offer ability to share location coordinates by user or a group of users, and/or restrict sharing location information at the city or zip code level. However, in order to convey location information related to a subscriber's presence at a precise and specific location, such as the subscriber's home or work, or a business or point of interest, the subscriber has to share their location coordinates or address information with other users and/or applications.


Further, the process of updating presence status with other users in a mobile instant messaging environment imposes additional challenges compared to the desktop instant messaging environment. Particularly, due to the battery, memory, processing and screen size limitations of the mobile devices, current mobile instant messaging applications drain the battery of the mobile device in the process of sending real time updates of the presence information of the entire buddy list.


Also, several mobile location-based and social networking applications require a mapping interface to display the mobile user's location. Due to bandwidth constraints of the mobile network, and the memory, processing capability and battery limitations of the mobile device, delivering mapping information on mobile networks adds additional costs and complexity limiting the adoption of such applications.


SUMMARY

In most instances, what users really need is the ability to share location contextual information about their presence at specific locations (such as home, office, school, etc.) where they spend most of their time, and selectively sharing their location coordinates with other users when requested by the user or as the need arises. The invention provides users an option to share location contextual information related to user-specified locations by using generic or user-specified location names, graphical indicators and/or location category information, and further provide location based presence status to other users of instant messaging applications without sharing their location coordinates or address information.


In other instances, when users are at a business or a point of interest such as a restaurant, library, golf course, etc., the invention enables the mobile user to indicate their presence status based on the category of that location, (e.g., restaurant, golf course, library, etc.) and optionally based on the business or POI name without sharing location coordinates with other users.


In other instances when the user is driving, the invention enables the mobile user to indicate their presence status as driving to convey they are not at their regular locations such as home or work, and provide location contextual information based on geographical area or proximity to user-specified locations without sharing their location coordinates and without offering location tracking capability to other users.


Such location contextual information and location based presence status, in most instances, enables the calling or messaging party to become aware of the user's availability status, and can be broadly shared with all contacts, while significantly mitigating concerns about privacy and liability related to tracking user's location coordinates.


Another embodiment of the invention is to group users and/or location privacy options into multiple, numerically or descriptively labeled, location privacy or location sharing levels, wherein one of the levels is based on sharing location contextual status at precise locations using generic or user-specified location names, location status indicators, or location category information, without sharing location coordinates or address information of the user.


Another aspect of the invention is to enable an efficient and optimal method of updating location based presence status with a large number of contacts in a mobile and instant messaging environment. Other features of the invention will be apparent from the description, the drawings and the claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Foregoing aspects of the invention will become better understood by referring to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an exemplary communication system providing a suitable operating environment for the present invention.



FIG. 2
a is an exemplary classification of location contextual information into multiple, numerically and descriptively labeled, location sharing levels.



FIG. 2
b is an exemplary table for associating location contextual name types with corresponding sharing levels.



FIG. 3 is an exemplary flowchart for updating users at multiple location sharing levels with the location based presence status corresponding to that level as the user's location changes.



FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary flowchart to update a user's location status table based on whether user is at or near user-specified locations, driving, or at business or POI locations.



FIG. 5
a is an exemplary table for storing user-specified locations and corresponding criteria for sharing location contextual information when user is at this location.



FIG. 5
b is an exemplary table for storing user's favorite business and POI locations and corresponding criteria for sharing location contextual information.



FIG. 6 is an exemplary table for storing a user's location based presence status corresponding to each location sharing level.



FIG. 7 is an exemplary user interface for specifying location contextual information corresponding to multiple location sharing levels.



FIG. 8 is an exemplary flowchart for determining user's preferred messaging options corresponding to user-specified locations.



FIG. 9 is an exemplary flowchart for determining user's preferred messaging options corresponding to specific location categories.



FIG. 10 is an exemplary flowchart for determining location status if there are multiple or co-located business or POI options at or near user's current location.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 and the following description provide a general description of a communication system 100 suitable for implementing various features of the invention. With reference to FIG. 1, an exemplary communication system for implementing the invention includes a mobile carrier network 110 which offers voice, messaging and/or data services to mobile phones 120a and 120b, and is capable of communicating with instant messaging (IM) networks, such as, a public IM network 130 and public IM client 132, or an enterprise IM network 140 and enterprise IM client 142. The mobile carrier network 110 is also capable of communicating with other telephone or data networks 150 such as a Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) or a Voice over Internet Protocol (VOIP) network capable of delivering voice and/or data services to communication devices such as a phone 152. The communication system may also comprise of a fixed mobile or a broadband mobile network 160, such as, for example, a WiMax network capable of delivering voice and data services through communication devices such as a mobile data card 162.


In particular, the communication system 100 is capable of detecting or receiving geographic location information of a user's mobile phone or other associated terminal or device. In one implementation, the mobile carrier network 110 includes a mobile positioning system 112 that is capable of determining location coordinates of the mobile phones 120a and 120b. The mobile positioning system 112 may receive the location coordinates from the Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver embedded in the mobile phone 120a or 120b, and in another implementation assist the mobile phone 120a or 120b in determining its location using one or more of the mobile positioning methods including Assisted (A-GPS), Time Difference of Arrival (TDOA), or other approaches that provide location coordinates within specified constraints of accuracy. In one implementation, the mobile positioning system 112 includes a location server which may be a Gateway Mobile Location Center (GMLC) in case of GSM networks or a Mobile Positioning Center (MPC) in case of CDMA networks, which provides the user's location information to third party location application servers implementing location based services and applications.


The mobile carrier network 110 also includes a mobile messaging system 114 that is capable of transmitting text or data messages from and to the mobile phones 120a or 120b, which may include image, audio or video messages, and may use one or more of the mobile data messaging services and protocols including Short Messaging Service (SMS), Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS), Wireless Application Protocol (WAP) or other Internet Protocol (IP) based data and application-layer protocols used in third generation (3G) mobile standards, such as, for example, Session Initiation Protocol (SIP). The mobile carrier network 110 may include any of the underlying RF transport protocols, such as, for example, General Packet Radio Service (GPRS), Enhanced Data rates for GSM Evolution (EDGE), Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA), CDMA 2000 1x-RTT, CDMA 1x-EV-DO, or any of the 3G or 4G mobile standards.


The mobile phones 120a and 120b are exemplary mobile devices used by two different mobile subscribers, which may be on the same mobile carrier network, or may be part of different mobile carrier networks. The mobile phones 120a or 120b include an address book 122a or 122b, a location client application 124a or 124b, one or more mobile messaging applications 126a or 126b which may include a text messaging application, a multimedia messaging application, an email application, and/or an instant messaging application.


The public IM network 130 comprises of instant messaging (IM) services such as those offered by MSN, AOL, Yahoo, or Google, and may be based on proprietary implementations or based on industry standards such as Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) or Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP). The public IM client 132 may be a desktop or mobile IM client subscribing to a public IM network 130.


The enterprise IM network 140 comprises of instant messaging services provided by companies and large enterprises to their corporate users for a controlled and managed access to instant messaging services. The enterprise IM clients 142 may be a desktop or mobile IM client subscribing to an enterprise IM network 140.



FIG. 2
a illustrates an exemplary implementation of grouping various types of location contextual information into multiple, numeric and descriptively labeled location sharing levels. Further, one of the sharing levels enables sharing location contextual names of user-specified locations without sharing location coordinates of the user. In one implementation, the invention enables a mobile user to select location sharing options and select or specify descriptive names for location sharing levels 0 to 3 as described in table 210. As shown in table 210, the location contextual information options at a particular sharing level are in addition to the options available at the previous sharing level. As shown in field 212, at level 0, no location information is shared. As shown in field 214, at level 1, only city and state level information is shared by default, with options to select zip or area level names. As shown in field 216, at level 2, location contextual information corresponding to precise user-specified geographic locations is shared when user is at or near these locations, without providing street address or location coordinates of the user. Location contextual information may include names, categories and representative graphical indicators of user-specified locations and user-specified business or POI locations, and optionally categories of other non-specified business or POI locations, such as, for example, home, office, work, school, restaurant, golf course, library, etc. The user may also specify the option to include business or POI names when user is at non-specified business or POI locations. As shown in field 218, at level 3, all relevant location information may be shared with selected users at this level including street name, nearest intersection, business and POI names and/or categories as specified by the user. Location coordinates and street address are also shared if an authorized user at this level requests location coordinates or other location information that requires sharing such information such as, for example, directions to mobile subscriber's current location.



FIG. 2
b is an exemplary table for associating location contextual name types and corresponding sharing levels. As represented in table 220, the default settings for location name types and corresponding sharing levels are specified, along with the configuration options for sharing levels that maybe specified by the user. As represented in field 221, location names based on city and state are available for sharing with users at sharing level 1 or higher. As represented by field 222, when user is at or near user-specified locations, location contextual information based on location names and categories of these locations are available for sharing with users at sharing level 2 or higher, without providing location coordinates or street address information of the mobile subscriber's current location. As represented in field 223, user-specified POI names, which also include user-specified business names, will be available for sharing at level 2 or above. As shown in the configuration options, user may change the minimum sharing level for this location name type to level 3. As shown in field 224, the business or POI category information will be available for sharing with users at level 2 or above, when the mobile subscriber is determined to be at a business or POI location. The mobile subscriber may change the minimum sharing level for this location name type to level 3. Further, as shown in fields 225 and 226, location contextual information may also include street name and nearest intersection of their current location when sharing with users at level 3. The mobile subscriber may change the sharing level for this location name type to sharing level 2 or higher. As represented in field 227, business or POI names corresponding to user's current location, when user is determined to be at a location that is a business or POI will also be available for sharing with users at sharing level 3. The mobile subscriber may change the sharing level for this location name type to sharing level 2 or higher.



FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary flow diagram 300 for updating users at multiple location sharing levels with location based presence or status information corresponding to that level, as the mobile subscriber's location changes. Beginning at block 302, the location application server responsible for storing and sharing location contextual information of mobile phones 124a or 124b requests location coordinates and accuracy information from mobile positioning system 112. The mobile positioning system 112 may provide the most recent location information of the mobile device from its database or cache, or may request current location information from the corresponding mobile phone 120a or 120b. At the decision block 304, a test is made to determine if the current location of mobile device has changed from its previous location above a minimum threshold to account for the accuracy constraints of the location information. If the location has not changed, at block 308, the location application 124a or 124b is instructed to wait for a specified time interval and then repeat the process of requesting updated location coordinates in block 302. In another implementation, the functions of blocks 302, 304, and 308 may be performed by a trigger or notification step in the mobile positioning system, which would notify the designated location application server when the location of mobile device changes, and provide the updated location coordinates of the mobile subscriber. In yet another implementation, the functions of blocks 302, 304, and 308 may be performed by another location application server within the mobile carrier network working in conjunction with the mobile positioning system. At block 306, the location application 124a or 124b or the designated location application server determines and updates the location based presence status corresponding to each sharing level, described in detail in FIG. 4. After the location status table is updated based on the current location, tests are made in the decision blocks 310, 312 and 314 to determine if the location status corresponding to level 1, 2 and 3 changed as a result of the new location of the mobile subscriber. In blocks 316, 318, 320, corresponding level 1, 2 or 3 users are updated if the location status for their corresponding sharing levels has changed. In one scenario, only level 2 and/or level 3 status may change, while level 1 status may remain the same as before, e.g., if the mobile subscriber has moved to a new location which is in the same city, level 1 status would remain the same. The application server, in this case, will only update location status with level 2 and level 3 users, thus minimizing the frequency of updates for level 1 users, and providing an efficient way for updating only a subset of users that are authorized to receive more specific location status.


Additionally, mobile subscribers may select level 1 or level 2 as their default location sharing level for sharing with all users who request location status or are in the contacts list. In one implementation, any user can request and receive the mobile subscriber's location status corresponding to the default location sharing level, and the location application server only updates location status with a subset of users corresponding to the higher sharing levels, thus providing an efficient and optimal way for sharing location based presence status with a large number of users. In another implementation, location status corresponding to the default sharing level 1 or 2 is shared with the public IM network with an option to request location status corresponding to higher sharing levels, which may then be provided automatically if the contact is an authorized user at the higher sharing level, or the request may be sent for approval to the mobile subscriber.



FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary flowchart to update a mobile subscriber's location status table based on whether the user is at or near user-specified locations, driving, or at a business or POI location. As described earlier, when the test in decision block 304 determines that the location of mobile subscriber has changed, the subroutine 400 starts, and as shown in block 402, the mobile phone's location coordinates, accuracy and speed information are provided by the mobile positioning system 112. At block 404, the location coordinates of the mobile subscriber are compared with the location coordinates of the user-specified locations stored in the tables shown in FIGS. 5a and 5b, and the nearest location and corresponding distance from user's current location is determined. At decision block 406, if user's current location is determined to be at or near this user-specified location within a specified distance, it is further specified if the user is at this location or near this location (e.g., at home, near home, at work, near work). Accordingly, in block 408, the location status table is updated based on the user-specified location and user criteria for status at level 1, 2 and 3. And if, in decision block 406, the user is determined to be not at or near any of the user-specified locations, then another test is made in decision block 410 to determine if the user is moving at or above a certain specified speed (e.g. moving at or above a speed of 10 miles per hour) whereby the status of the user is considered as driving, otherwise the user is considered to be stationary or moving at a slower speed but not at or near any user-specified location. If the user is determined to be driving, then as shown in block 412, the location status table in updated accordingly. And if the user is determined to be stationary within reasonable constraints of accuracy, then another decision test is made at block 414 to determine if the user is at a business or a POI location. If the user is determined to be at a business or POI location, then as shown in block 424, business name, category, and address information is requested from a geo-database and/or a business or POI database, and accordingly in block 426, the location status is updated with the corresponding information and user-specified criteria for each sharing level. If user is determined to be moving at a slower speed than specified for being considered as driving, or if there are multiple co-located businesses at the current location, user maybe prompted to confirm or select the current business location, and for these scenarios, the functions of blocks 414, 424 and 426 are replaced by subroutine 1000, and shown in detail in FIG. 10. If the user is considered to be driving or if in block 414, the user was determined to be stationary but not at a business or POI location, then the location status is determined corresponding to geographical area level information or based on the sharing level 1 status of the user. Accordingly, in block 416, the address information of the user is requested using the reverse geocode feature of the mobile positioning system or using another geo-database. At decision block 418, if the city (or area level information, as specified by the user) has changed, then the level 1 status is updated accordingly. If the city or area level information has not changed, then as shown in block 422, then only level 2 and/or level 3 status information is updated in the location status table of the mobile subscriber. Further, the level 2 textual status in this case may be same as level 1 status, as no additional location name and/or status information may be available for level 2.


As shown in FIG. 5a, table 500 is an exemplary list of user-specified locations and corresponding settings saved in the pre-specified user's locations table that are available for determining the location status as described in steps 404, 406 and 408. In this example, two of the most common user locations, “Home” and “Work”, are saved, where a user is likely to spend most of their time. In field 502, a generic location name such as “Work” may be specified by the user, or a more contextual location name may be specified (e.g., HQ, Main Campus, Factory, Building 34, etc.). In field 504, the address of the location is saved, which maybe provided by the user, or determined by the system based on location coordinates provided or saved by the user. In field 506, location coordinates are either specified by the user, or determined based on the address information provided in 504, or saved while user selects the options to save current location while at that particular location. In field 508, user selects an appropriate location category from the available list, or specifies a new category, which may be used to indicate the location status of the user. In field 510, user selects the default setting for minimum sharing level, or specifies from the range of options, based on which the location status will be shared with users in the corresponding sharing levels when the user is at that particular location. In fields 512 and 514, the user may select default settings or specify options for days, dates, and/or time settings when the location status should be shared with other users.


As shown in FIG. 5b, table 520 is an exemplary table for storing user-specified business and POI locations, where the user wants to share location contextual status based on names, categories and/or address information of these locations. The user may save these locations and corresponding information while visiting these locations and building this list over time, or add locations at any time by specifying the required information, or by searching for specific business or POI locations by name or address using the options provided in the location application. In field 522, the name of the business or POI that may be used for location status is saved by either looking up from a business or POI database, or by having the user specify or customize the name. In field 524, the address of the location is saved, which maybe provided by the user, or determined by the system based on information available from the business or POI database, or by looking up address corresponding to the location coordinates. In field 526, location coordinates of the business or POI are either specified by the user, or determined based on the address information provided in 524, or saved while user selects the options to save current location while at that particular location. In field 528, geometry information of the POI is saved to indicate whether the POI is a point or covers an area of a specified geometry, in which case, additional information may be stored or requested from the geo database to determine location status at that location. In field 530, the appropriate location category is saved based on information received from the business or POI database, or as specified by the user. In field 532, user selects the default setting for minimum sharing level for location name of the business or POI, or specifies from the range of options, based on which the location status will be shared with users in the corresponding sharing levels when the user is at that particular location. In field 534, user selects the default setting for minimum sharing level for location category of the business or POI, or specifies from the range of options, based on which the location status will be shared with users in the corresponding sharing levels when the user is at that particular location.


As shown in FIG. 6, table 600 is an exemplary table and illustration for determining and storing a user's location based presence status corresponding to each sharing level. Field 602 indicates the sharing level, which in current implementation ranges from 0 to 3 as described in table 210. A user may add a new sharing level, but for the purpose of this exemplary implementation, we assume levels 0 to 3, whereby at level 0, no location status is shared, and hence only levels 1 to 3 have a corresponding location status. As described earlier, at level 1, location name is based on city and state information, and as the location status of mobile subscriber is determined, in blocks 408, 420 or 426, the corresponding city and state information is updated in the field 606 corresponding to the record 610. Additionally, the last known status for this level may be saved along with a timestamp in a similar table to determine in the decision block 310 if the current status has changed from the previous status. Further, as the location status of mobile subscriber is determined, in blocks 408, 422, and 426, the corresponding level 2 and level 3 records 612 and 614 are updated accordingly. If the user is at or near a user-specified location corresponding to table 500 or 520, the corresponding status in field 604 will indicate “at” or “near” or another descriptor indicating proximity to the specified location. Additionally, for level 3 status in 614, approximate distance or time to location may be saved to indicate user is “within x miles” or “within y minutes” of the respective location. In another instance, if the status of the mobile subscriber in block 410 was determined to be driving, corresponding status indicator option in field 608 of records 612 and 614 will be saved.



FIG. 7 is an exemplary user interface of the mobile device 120a or 120b for indicating the sharing level options of the location application 124a or 124b. The sharing level interface 700 includes an option to select the default sharing level as indicated by setting 702. The user can also select any of the sharing levels and change settings for that sharing level. The sharing level interface screen 710 describes the settings for sharing level 1 and includes the default name for this level “City, State” and provides an option button which provides an option to specify or change the name of the sharing level. The settings 712 indicate options available for location name types at this level, and are based on area level name types and provide options to select one or more area level name type for this level. The “+” indicates that the option is currently selected, and “−” indicates that the option is not selected, but is available for selection at this sharing level. The sharing level interface screen 720 describes the settings for sharing level 2 and includes the default name for this level “Favorite Locations” and provides options to change the name and other settings for this sharing level. The settings 722 indicate the selected and available options for location name types at this level, which include the options for selecting favorite locations, POI categories and POI names. Favorite locations include the user-specified locations in table 500 and user-specified business or POI locations in table 520. The POI categories setting include all the categories corresponding to other POI locations not included in table 520. The POI names setting includes the names corresponding to other POI locations not included in table 520, which is not selected by default at sharing level 2, but the user may specify this option at this sharing level. The sharing level interface screen 730 describes the settings for sharing level 3 and includes the default name for this level “Location Coordinates” and provides an option to specify or change the name of the sharing level. The settings 732 indicate options available for location information at this level, and are based on proximity based information such as nearest intersection, street name, and POI names, in addition location information available at sharing level 2, and also includes the options to share street address and location coordinates at this level.



FIG. 8 is an exemplary flowchart for determining user's preferred messaging options corresponding to user-specified locations. As described earlier in decision block 406, when user is determined to be at any of the user-specified locations, the block 408 also includes the subroutine 800 in the process of determining the location status at this location. As shown in block 802, user is determined to be at a user-specified location. In the decision test of block 804, it is determined whether the user has specified any preferred messaging options corresponding to that user-specified location. For example, user may specify the home phone as preferred calling option while user's location status is “at home”, or work phone as preferred calling option while user's location status is “at work”. In other instances, the user may specify email, SMS or IM as preferred messaging options. If such a preferred messaging or calling option is specified, in block 806, it is added to the location status table 600.



FIG. 9 is an exemplary flowchart for determining user's preferred messaging options corresponding to specific location categories. When user is determined to be at a business or POI location, the block 428 includes the subroutine 900 in the process of determining and updating the location status at this location. As shown in block 902, user is determined to be at a business or POI location. In the decision test of block 904, it is determined whether the user has specified any preferred messaging options corresponding to that business or POI location or any default options exists for the location category. For example, for the POI category library, the user may specify email, SMS or IM as preferred messaging options. If such a preferred messaging option is specified, in block 906, it is added to the location status in table 600 discussed earlier.



FIG. 10 is an exemplary flowchart for determining location status when there are multiple or co-located business or POI options at or near user's current location. As described earlier, in the test block 410, when the user is not at a user-specified location and not moving above a specified speed to be considered as driving, a test is made to determine if user is at a business or POI location. However, in several instances, multiple co-located business or POI locations may correspond to the user's current location within the constraints of accuracy of the mobile positioning system 112. Also, the user may be moving at a slower speed, and not stationary. In order to address these scenarios and determine the corresponding business or POI location, the functions of blocks 414, 424 and 426 may be replaced by subroutine 1000. In the decision block 1002, it is first determined if the user is stationary within the constraints of accuracy of the mobile positioning system 112. If the user is not considered stationary, then at block 1006, the location application 124a or 124b is instructed to wait for a specified time interval and then request updated location coordinates and repeat the process in block 1002. If the user is considered to be stationary, at block 1004, the nearest POI locations and corresponding distances are determined. At the decision block 1008, a test is made to determine if the user's current location corresponds to one and only one business or POI location, and if yes, then in block 1016, the business or POI name, category, and address information of that location are provided as the current location. If not, then at block 1010, it is determined if the user's current location may correspond to multiple POI locations, as determined within the accuracy constraints and specified distance criteria. If there are multiple co-located or nearby POI locations in the vicinity of user's location, at block 1012, a list of nearest locations within specified distance of user is provided to the user's location application 124a or 124b, and at block 1014, the user is prompted to select the current location from the list presented, and based on user's input, the information pertaining to that location is provided to block 1016. However, if there is no response from the user within a specified time, at block 1006, the location application 124a or 124b is instructed to wait for a specified time interval and request updated location coordinates and then repeat the process in block 1002.


It is also noted that while the above describes the exemplifying embodiments of the invention, those skilled in the art would appreciate several variations and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as described in the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A computer-implemented method, comprising: determining, by a mobile computing device, when a location of a user changes above a specified threshold;sending, by the mobile computing device, information pertaining to the change in the location of the user to a server configured to provide location information to one or more other applications based on a respective sharing level of the one or more other applications;determining, by the mobile computing device, when the mobile computing device is stationary within a specified threshold of accuracy, and waiting for a specified time or until a trigger or notification is received indicating that the location of the user has changed before requesting location information from a mobile positioning system;displaying, by the mobile computing device, a sharing level interface screen that displays a plurality of privacy or sharing level options to a user;receiving, by the mobile computing device, one or more sharing level setting changes from the user; andchanging, by the mobile computing device, one or more of the sharing level options based on the sharing level setting changes received from the user, whereinthe sharing levels correspond with an amount of detail that is provided pertaining to the user's location.
  • 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving, by the mobile computing device, a selection of a default sharing level from the user; andsetting, by the mobile computing device, the default sharing level to the user selection, whereinthe default sharing level is applied to users who are not already associated with a different sharing level than the default sharing level.
  • 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising: associating, by the mobile computing device, one or more groups with specified sharing levels, wherein contacts added to a group are assigned the group's specified sharing level settings by default.
  • 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the sharing level options comprise options available for location name types at a given level, the location name types are based on area level name types, and the sharing level interface screen provides options to select one or more area level name types for each sharing level.
  • 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the sharing levels comprise options for selecting favorite locations, Point-of-Interest categories and Point-of-Interest names.
  • 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising: sending, by the mobile computing device, information pertaining to the one or more sharing level setting changes to a server configured to provide location status information to at least one other mobile computing device based on a respective sharing level of the at least one other mobile computing device.
  • 7. A computer-implemented method, comprising: determining, by a computing device, when a location of the mobile device changes above a specified threshold;sending, by the computing device, information pertaining to the change in the location of the computing device to a server configured to provide location information to one or more other applications based on a respective sharing level of the one or more other applications;determining, by the computing device, when the computing device is stationary within a specified threshold of accuracy, and waiting for a specified time or until a trigger or notification is received indicating that the location of the computing device has changed before requesting location information from a mobile positioning system;receiving, by the computing device, location status information pertaining to the location of the mobile computing device; anddisplaying, by the computing device, the location status information to the user of the computing device, whereinthe location status information is based on a sharing level associated with the computing device.
  • 8. The computer-implemented method of claim 7, further comprising: receiving, by the computing device, a message with an option for retrieving the location status of the user of the mobile computing device via instant messaging, email, text messaging, social networking, or other location based applications.
  • 9. The computer-implemented method of claim 7, wherein the location status information pertains to one or more of a user-specified location, a business, a Point-of-Interest location, or that the mobile subscriber of the mobile computing device is driving.
  • 10. The computer-implemented method of claim 7, wherein the location status information does not comprise the coordinates of the mobile computing device.
  • 11. The computer-implemented method of claim 7, further comprising: sending, by the computing device, a request for the location status of the mobile computing device to a server.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of, and claims priority of, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/838,876, filed Aug. 14, 2007. The subject matter of this earlier-filed application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (231)
Number Name Date Kind
5946647 Miller et al. Aug 1999 A
6055513 Katz et al. Apr 2000 A
6057872 Candelore May 2000 A
6101484 Halbert et al. Aug 2000 A
6157841 Bolduc et al. Dec 2000 A
6269343 Pallakoff Jul 2001 B1
6295528 Marcus et al. Sep 2001 B1
6381303 Vu et al. Apr 2002 B1
6385458 Papadimitriou et al. May 2002 B1
6400956 Richton Jun 2002 B1
6442391 Johansson et al. Aug 2002 B1
6442530 Miller Aug 2002 B1
6446004 Cao et al. Sep 2002 B1
6452498 Stewart Sep 2002 B2
6505123 Root et al. Jan 2003 B1
6542820 Lamance et al. Apr 2003 B2
6556975 Wittsche Apr 2003 B1
6560534 Abraham et al. May 2003 B2
6587835 Treyz et al. Jul 2003 B1
6611751 Warren Aug 2003 B2
6631404 Philyaw Oct 2003 B1
6647257 Owensby Nov 2003 B2
6651000 Van Diggelen et al. Nov 2003 B2
6668167 McDowell et al. Dec 2003 B2
6754585 Root et al. Jun 2004 B2
6756882 Benes et al. Jun 2004 B2
6756917 Gould et al. Jun 2004 B2
6760046 I'Anson et al. Jul 2004 B2
6760601 Suoknuuti et al. Jul 2004 B1
6763299 Jones Jul 2004 B2
6763300 Jones Jul 2004 B2
6764003 Martschitsch et al. Jul 2004 B1
6788766 Logan Sep 2004 B2
6826617 Ansell et al. Nov 2004 B1
6829535 Van Diggelen et al. Dec 2004 B2
6836730 Root et al. Dec 2004 B2
6839554 McDowell et al. Jan 2005 B2
6847959 Arrouye et al. Jan 2005 B1
6850837 Paulaskas et al. Feb 2005 B2
6868396 Smith et al. Mar 2005 B2
6871140 Florance et al. Mar 2005 B1
6873997 Majjasie et al. Mar 2005 B1
6912398 Domnitz Jun 2005 B1
6912517 Agnihotri et al. Jun 2005 B2
6931254 Egner et al. Aug 2005 B1
6937998 Swartz et al. Aug 2005 B1
6944467 Ala-Luukko Sep 2005 B2
6944679 Parupudi et al. Sep 2005 B2
6947976 Devitt et al. Sep 2005 B1
6954633 Metternich et al. Oct 2005 B1
6954697 Smith Oct 2005 B1
6957393 Fano et al. Oct 2005 B2
6965868 Bednarek Nov 2005 B1
6965872 Grdina Nov 2005 B1
6973322 Buchmann et al. Dec 2005 B2
6973438 Philyaw Dec 2005 B1
6975872 Cheng Dec 2005 B2
6983146 Spratt Jan 2006 B2
6985813 Root et al. Jan 2006 B2
6988037 Root et al. Jan 2006 B2
6992617 Diggelen et al. Jan 2006 B2
6996402 Logan et al. Feb 2006 B2
6996579 Leung et al. Feb 2006 B2
7071842 Brady, Jr. Jul 2006 B1
7092964 Dougherty et al. Aug 2006 B1
7116985 Wilson et al. Oct 2006 B2
7206568 Sudit Apr 2007 B2
7219303 Fish May 2007 B2
7224978 Zellner et al. May 2007 B2
7224987 Bhela et al. May 2007 B1
7236799 Wilson et al. Jun 2007 B2
7237201 Fish Jun 2007 B2
7242946 Kokkonen et al. Jul 2007 B2
7245925 Zellner Jul 2007 B2
7266443 Hirose Sep 2007 B2
7315259 Sacks Jan 2008 B2
7352322 Tsujimoto et al. Apr 2008 B2
7412400 Bhela et al. Aug 2008 B1
7417544 Artem et al. Aug 2008 B2
7418267 Karaoguz Aug 2008 B2
7418451 Leung et al. Aug 2008 B2
7418503 Zellner et al. Aug 2008 B2
7426436 Van Watermulen et al. Sep 2008 B1
7532900 Wilson et al. May 2009 B2
7589628 Brady, Jr. Sep 2009 B1
7628704 Uhlir et al. Dec 2009 B1
7761414 Freedman Jul 2010 B2
8046721 Chaudhri et al. Oct 2011 B2
8068857 Wilson et al. Nov 2011 B2
8070608 Uhlir et al. Dec 2011 B2
8074172 Kocienda et al. Dec 2011 B2
8126889 Pitt Feb 2012 B2
20020002504 Engel et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020035605 McDowell et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020065111 Otsuka et al. May 2002 A1
20020067308 Robertson Jun 2002 A1
20020077130 Owensby Jun 2002 A1
20020091568 Kraft et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020102993 Hendrey et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020111172 DeWolf et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020188589 Salmenkaita et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198851 Hashimoto et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030055983 Callegari Mar 2003 A1
20030060214 Hendrey et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030078053 Abtin et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030093314 Leung et al. May 2003 A1
20030207683 Lempio et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030220835 Barnes, Jr. Nov 2003 A1
20030229592 Florance et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040023666 Moon et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040036622 Dukach et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040111335 Black et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040192351 Duncan Sep 2004 A1
20040203561 Jakubowski Oct 2004 A1
20040203879 Gardner et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040203888 Mikan Oct 2004 A1
20040203901 Wilson et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040203922 Hines et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050027437 Takenaga et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050027608 Wiesmuller et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050085952 Park et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050096013 Lehikoinen et al. May 2005 A1
20050096040 Haberman et al. May 2005 A1
20050144291 Frank et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050153729 Logan et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050165788 Yang et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050177416 Linden Aug 2005 A1
20050202832 Sudit Sep 2005 A1
20050227711 Orwant et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050250517 Fukui et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050261001 Marley et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050272413 Bourne Dec 2005 A1
20060020508 Gorti et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060022048 Johnson Feb 2006 A1
20060046744 Dublish et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060116817 Salmre et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060135177 Winterbottom et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060218151 Adelman et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060253453 Chmaytelli et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060277290 Shank Dec 2006 A1
20070019587 Okamoto et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070037610 Logan Feb 2007 A1
20070042788 Duan Feb 2007 A1
20070042789 Moton et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070047479 Shaffer et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070049287 Dunn Mar 2007 A1
20070049288 Lamprecht et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070049289 Woo Mar 2007 A1
20070049292 Emond Mar 2007 A1
20070049293 Russell Mar 2007 A1
20070060171 Sudit et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070072619 Wei et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070072621 Mukkavilli et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070072625 Fournier et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070072626 Babu et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070077939 Uematsu et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070077942 Heaven et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070077943 Hamilla Apr 2007 A1
20070080830 Sacks Apr 2007 A1
20070082668 Silver et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070082680 Fish Apr 2007 A1
20070082681 Kim et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070082682 Kim et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070091838 Kobayashi et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070093257 McDougall et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070096900 Contractor May 2007 A1
20070099625 Rosenfeld May 2007 A1
20070099627 Kofol et al. May 2007 A1
20070105565 Enzmann et al. May 2007 A1
20070105566 Sharony et al. May 2007 A1
20070117571 Musial May 2007 A1
20070117572 Adam et al. May 2007 A1
20070117573 Kennedy et al. May 2007 A1
20070129082 Thacher Jun 2007 A1
20070129083 Creamer et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070135136 Ische Jun 2007 A1
20070142059 Wang Jun 2007 A1
20070142060 Moton et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070149208 Syrbe et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070149210 McKiou et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070149211 Dunn et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070149212 Gupta et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070149213 Lamba et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070149214 Walsh et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070149216 Misikangas Jun 2007 A1
20070155399 Alberth et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070155400 Madsen Jul 2007 A1
20070159322 Campbell et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070161381 Chen et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070161382 Melinger et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070161401 Sheynblat Jul 2007 A1
20070162582 Belali et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070167170 Fitchett et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070167171 Bishop Jul 2007 A1
20070168127 Zaruba et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070168524 Chao et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070185768 Vengroff et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070233385 Dicke et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080071749 Schloter Mar 2008 A1
20080132251 Altman et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080147546 Weichselbaumer et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080172173 Chang et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080209332 Chevsky et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080214161 Jakl Sep 2008 A1
20080242231 Gray Oct 2008 A1
20080248810 Obradovich Oct 2008 A1
20080252517 Fuchs et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080266324 Lynch et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080288545 Hegedus et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080299900 Lesyna Dec 2008 A1
20080316091 Wigren et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090006480 Fuchs et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090009397 Taylor et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090009398 Taylor et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090033553 Tusjimoto et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090042584 Nagata et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090043491 Haatainen Feb 2009 A1
20090047972 Neeraj Feb 2009 A1
20090063304 Meggs Mar 2009 A1
20090082024 Elliott Mar 2009 A1
20090098880 Lindquist Apr 2009 A1
20090176475 Salkini et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090278738 Gopinath Nov 2009 A1
20100017874 Piccinini et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100020776 Youssef et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100280874 Thorn Nov 2010 A1
20110077046 Durand et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110238517 Ramalingam et al. Sep 2011 A1
20120046051 Wilson et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120276926 Pitt Nov 2012 A1
20120284105 Li Nov 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (10)
Number Date Country
1 418 784 May 2004 EP
2002354522 Dec 2002 JP
2003161771 Jun 2003 JP
2003344092 Dec 2003 JP
2005323404 Nov 2005 JP
2007-51869 Dec 2005 JP
2010539738 Dec 2010 JP
10-2005-0004662 Jan 2005 KR
10-2005-0014940 May 2005 KR
10-2007-0053539 May 2007 KR
Non-Patent Literature Citations (35)
Entry
“CardStar iPhone App Wrangles Multiple Membership Cards,” written by Dong Ngo on May 15, 2009, http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938—105-10241727-1.html (last accessed May 22, 2013).
Apple Store POS Handhelds forum posts from Sep. 25, 2008, through Sep. 28, 2013, http://www.everythingcafe.com/forum/threads,apple-store-pos-handhelds.32824 (last accessed May 22, 2013).
Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/052,193 on Jun. 18, 2013.
Final Office Action received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/069,380 on Apr. 22, 2013.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,216 on Mar. 15, 2013.
Office Action issued in related Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-521129 on Feb. 4, 2013. English translation provided on pp. 6-9.
“Non-Final Office Action” issued on Nov. 1, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/923,722.
Non-Final Office Action of Oct. 30, 2013, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,217.
Office Action issued in related Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-521129 on Dec. 3, 2013. No translation.
Extended European Search Report issued on May 29, 2012, for European Application No. 08797761.7.
Marshall M McLeod, “Final Office Action”, dated Jul. 9, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,217.
Office Action (Non-Final) from U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,217 dated Dec. 20, 2011.
Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,216 on Dec. 28, 2012.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,217 dated Nov. 29, 2012.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/069,380 dated Nov. 29, 2012.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/052,193 on Jan. 2, 2013.
International Search Report for PCT/US2008/072977 mailed Jan. 30, 2009 (corresponds with PCT application for U.S. Appl. No. 11/838,876).
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/838,876 dated Oct. 19, 2010.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/838,876 dated Mar. 24, 2011.
Nov. 22, 2011 International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2011/028734.
Oct. 25, 2011 International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2011/028566.
An Exploration on Mobile Social Networking: Dodgeball as a Case in Point, Nina Ziv et al., Mobile Business, 2006, ICMB '06, International Conference of IEEE Computer Society, p. 21, XP031056542, DOI: 10.1109/ICMB.2006.8, ISBN: 978-0-7695-2595-2 (Jun. 1, 2006).
“Mobile Context Inference using Low-Cost Sensors”, Evan Welbourne et al., Lecture Notes in Computer Science—LNCS, Springer, DE, vol. 3479, pp. 254-263, XP007915205, ISSN: 0302-9743 (Jan. 1, 2005).
“Modular Bayesian Networks for Inferring Landmarks on Mobile Daily Life”, Keum-Sung Hwang et al., AI 2006: Advances in Artificial Intelligence Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, LNCS, Springer, Berlin, DE, pp. 929-933, XP019052024, ISBN: 978-3-540-49787-5 (Jan. 1, 2006).
“WatchMe: Communication and Awareness between members of a Closely-Knit Group”, Natalia Marmasse et al., UbiComp 2004: Ubiquitous Computing: 6th International Conference, Nottingham, UK, Sep. 7-10, 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3205 (Nov. 2, 2004).
Final Office Action dated May 9, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,217.
Non-Final Office Action issued on Jul. 27, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,216.
Doan, “Non- Final Office Action” issued on Nov. 1, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/923,722.
Katherine Kolosowski-Gager, “Non-Final Office Action” issued on Jul. 14, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/052,193.
Kiet M.Doan, Real-time Location and Presence using a Push-Location client and server, U.S. Appl. No. 13/923,722.
Marshall M. McLeod, “System for Sharing Favorites and Enabling In-Network Local Search Based on Network Rankings”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,217.
Notice of Allowance Issued on Apr. 1, 2014, in JP Application No. 2010-521129, which corresponds to U.S. Appl. No. 11/838,876.
Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/923,722 on Sep. 10, 2014.
Kiet M. Doan, “Notice of Allowance” issued on Oct. 14, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/923,722.
Phouc Huu Doan, “Non-Final Office Action” issued on Oct. 21, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/056,477.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120009900 A1 Jan 2012 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11838876 Aug 2007 US
Child 13241048 US