The disclosure herein involves identifying a location of a roaming object in an environment using wireless communications.
Systems and methods have been developed for identifying a location of a roaming object in an environment using wireless communications among multiple base units tracking the object.
Each patent, patent application, and/or publication mentioned in this specification is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety to the same extent as if each individual patent, patent application, and/or publication was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
A wireless animal location system is provided that identifies a location of a pet roaming within an environment and tracks/manages animal behavior in the environment using information of pet location. The wireless pet location system (or containment system) may disallow access to an area within an environment by applying a negative stimulus when an animal enters a prohibited location. For example, the system may apply a negative stimulus when an animal approaches a pantry space or waste collection space. Conversely, the system may allow the animal free and unimpeded access to other portions of the environment. For example, the system may forgo adverse stimulus when the animal is in desired locations such as animal bedding areas or dedicated animal play areas. The system may simply log an event in order to compile information regarding the animal's behavior. For example, the system may detect and log the presence of the animal near a watering bowl. Further the system may report such information to mobile applications allowing pet owners to monitor and track animal behavior in a home.
An RF-based wireless pet location system may utilize signal strength, two way ranging techniques, and/or time difference of arrival (techniques) to locate a target.
A signal strength based approach uses Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) values to determine the range between a roaming target and three or more spatially separated base units. The target or animal may wear a transceiver housed within a collar. The transceiver may receive and send RF signals to base units. Under an embodiment, three base units within the target's environment periodically transmit RF signals. The pet transceiver estimates its distance from each base unit using the strength of the corresponding RF communication received from each of the base units, i.e. using RSSI values. Based on the multiple ranging measurements, and a known location of the base units within a grid system, a single location may be resolved within the grid system.
This system requires at least three base units. This complicates the system as an outdoor installation needs to power any unit that is remote to an AC power source. This likely requires that one or more of the base units operate on underground wires or DC power, which is inconvenient if rechargeable, or expensive if primary cells are used. Also, the inclusion of three base units greatly increases the cost of a system. Further, the resultant location is not precise due to the variation of each signal strength determination due to environmental conditions and antenna pattern variation.
A wireless animal location system may use two way ranging (TWR) to determine and monitor animal location under an embodiment. The system may comprise a transceiver housed by a collar worn by an animal and three or more base units distributed in the monitored environment. The system determines the range between the animal target (i.e., animal collar) and the three or more spatially separated base units based on TWR of an RF signal between the target and each of the base units. Based on the multiple time of flight measurements between the collar transceiver and known locations of the base units within a grid system, a single location may be resolved within the grid system.
The system described above requires at least three base units. This complicates the system as an outdoor installation needs to power any unit that is remote to an AC power source. This likely requires that one or more of the base units operate on underground wires or DC power, which is inconvenient if rechargeable, or expensive if primary cells are used. Also, the inclusion of three base units greatly increases the cost of a system.
A wireless animal location system may use time difference of arrival calculations under an embodiment.
The time differential information may be used to determine the difference in distances between the target transceiver 502 and base units 504, 506, 508. The difference in distance information may then be used to determine hyperbolas representing possible locations of the transceiver. The intersection of hyperbolas is then used to locate the pet transceiver in a grid system.
x=22*cos(140°)=−16.85
y=22*sin(140°)=14.14
A grid portion or collection of grid portions may comprise a correction region (i.e. stimulus applied to pet in such region), a keep out region, a containment area, or a notification area. A base unit may transmit appropriate commands to the pet collar when the base unit locates the collar in corresponding grid portions. For example, the base unit may instruct the collar to apply a negative stimulus when the animal is in location 910. The base unit may instruct the collar take no action (or otherwise provide no instruction to take any action) when the animal is at location 914 within containment area 912. The base unit may instruct the collar to apply a negative stimulus when the animal is within a keep out region 916. The base unit may instruct the collar to log the location of the animal when the animal is within location areas 918, 920. Note that a keep out region or a notification region may be assigned to locations within a region that is a general containment area and in which no instruction is generally provided to the animal. This is possible due to the fact that specific areas within the monitored environment may be specifically associated with a function. In this way monitored environment areas 910 and 916 map to a corrective function and monitored environment areas 918, 920 map to logging/notification functions. Under an embodiment, a containment area may simply be all areas in the monitored environment not assigned a correction function.
The transceiver/antenna 1010 transmits an RF message or communication at time 0 seconds. The pet transceiver receives the first pulse of the communication at 66.7128 ns. The pet transceiver then processes the message and develops a response. The pet transceiver transmits the response at 1000 ns. The base unit transceiver/antenna 1010 receives the first pulse of the communication at 1066.7128 ns. The base unit receiver/antenna 1014 receives the first pulse of the communication at 1067.18648 ns. The base unit receiver/antenna 1012 receives the first pulse of the communication at 1067.3572 ns. Note that the data disclosed in this paragraph corresponds to the example set forth below with respect to
This process collects key information for resolution of a range and angular value for locating the pet transceiver. First, the process reveals the order in which base unit antennas 1010, 1012, 1014 receive the return transmission from the pet transceiver. Second, the process reveals a return time differential between base unit antennas. Continuing with the example set forth above the receive time differential between transceiver/antenna 1010 and receiver/antenna 1014 is 0.47368 ns. Third, the process provides range information. The time of flight between transmission of the response communication and receipt thereof by transceiver/antenna 1010 with respect to the example set forth above comprises 66.7128 ns corresponding to a distance of 20 meters from transceiver/antenna 1010 to pet transceiver. This information may be used to determine range and angular values for locating the pet using a far field model as further described below. Again note that the data disclosed in this paragraph corresponds to the example set forth below with respect to
Under one embodiment, a far field model may determine range and angular values using two way ranging and time difference of arrival computations set forth above. The far field model is based on the fact that the distance from base unit to pet transceiver is significantly farther than the distance between transceiver/receivers of the base unit. This model allows a spherical wave to be approximated by a plane.
The far field model implements the following steps:
Use time of flight information to determine a distance from transceiver/antenna to pet transceiver.
Determine the first two antennas to receive a return transmission from a pet transceiver.
Use the information of the first two receiving antennas to determine an approximate “quadrant” region surrounding the pet (as further shown in
Determine a time difference of arrival between the two first antennas.
Use equations based on an identified region (see
Quadrant I (30-90 degrees): first reception 1014, second reception 1010
Quadrant II (90-150 degrees): first reception 1010, second reception 1014
Quadrant III (150-210 degrees): first reception 1010, second reception 1012
Quadrant IV (210-270 degrees): first reception 1012, second reception 1010
Quadrant V (270-330 degrees): first reception 1012, second reception 1014
Quadrant VI (330-30 degrees): first reception 1014, second reception 1012
As demonstrated by the partitioning of planar space in
D=CT
C=speed of RF signal from pet transceiver
T=receive time differential between antennas 1010, 1014
Once D is known, there is enough information to solve for θ (as described in greater detail below) and thereby determine an angular value.
Therefore the location of the pet may be approximated with a range, angular value of (20 m, 44.723).
Therefore, the location of the pet may be approximated with a range, angular value of (20 m, 147.53).
Therefore, the location of the pet may be approximated with a range, angular value of (20 m, 263.25). In this case, it is known based on time differential that the pet transceiver is located in Quadrant III. This means that θ is computed with respect to antennas 1010 and 1012. Therefore, the angular value must be approximated by adding 120° such that the angular value sweeps through Quadrant I and Quadrant II and then an additional 143.25° through Quadrant III. In like manner, angular estimates for the pet transceiver in quadrants IV, V, and VI should add 180°, 240°, and 300°, respectively.
It should be further noted that angle computations are applied according the detected position of the pet transceiver. As indicated above, it is known based on receive time differentials that the pet transceiver is located in one of Quadrants I-VI. As one example, the pet transceiver may be located in Quadrant V. Therefore, a known computation may be applied to determine an angular location of the animal with respect to a line between antennas 1012 and 1014. Assuming the facts set forth above with respect to
The examples presented above utilize three antennas in an equilateral triangle configuration, however this is not a limitation as the number of antennas can be any number greater than three, or greater than two if a physical limitation exists to block 180 degrees of the coverage of the area. Further, the configuration of antennas is not limited to any specific trigonometric configuration.
It should be noted that the time difference of arrival among transceiver/antennas and/or receiver/antennas may be determined by the difference in phase of the carrier signal of an incoming signal.
Three dimensional positional resolution can also be performed. It can be treated as two separate two-dimensional position resolutions in two perpendicular planes as long as there are positional differences between the antennas in the two planes.
A single base station wireless animal location system as described above determines the distance and bearing angle relative from a reference axis originating at the base station and a target animal wearing a transceiver that is communicatively coupled with the base station. The base station contains at least one transceiver and two receivers. These receivers can also be realized as transceivers. The embodiments below simply refer to transceiver arrays. Each of these transceivers has an associated antenna. The base station also includes a system processing unit. The system processing unit is linked to the transceivers via analog or digital cabling. This linking typically occurs within a system Printed Circuit Board Assembly (PCBA). There must also be some sort of power source, whether that be power from an external source cabled into the system or a local battery pack. Power is routed from the power source to the system processing unit and transceivers.
To measure the distance from the base station to the target animal wearing a communicatively coupled transceiver, the system utilizes time-of-flight of an RF signal as described in detail above. One of the transceivers on the base unit is responsible for communicating with the animal transceiver via RF signals. During this exchange, the time of flight of an RF signal from a transceiver antenna on the animal to the location of the base unit transceiver antenna may be determined. The time of flight is then converted into a distance.
To determine the bearing relative to a reference axis to the transceiver on the animal, the difference in RE communication time between the transceivers contained within the base unit and the transceiver on the animal must be determined. As already described in detail above, this delta time can be measured as a time difference or a phase difference. Once the difference in times between the transceivers are known, a direction to the target can be calculated.
To make this all work, the transceiver antennas within the base unit must have first-path RF communication with the transceiver on the animal. If this first-path is blocked and a reflection is utilized, the additional path distance the reflected signal took will be utilized, corrupting the range and relative bearing calculations.
A single base station wireless animal location system depends on reliable RF communication between the multiple transceivers contained within the base unit and the transceiver located on the target animal.
As the transceivers within the base unit need to communicate with a system processing unit, these transceivers are typically mounted on one or more Printed Circuit Board Assemblies (PCBAs). These PCB As typically contain conductive traces and ground planes. The PCBA provides connectivity from the system processing unit to the transceivers. The PCBA also provides power distribution from the power source to the system processing unit and transceivers.
The problem is that the RF signals sent to, and received from, the target animal transceiver can be blocked by the conductive components of this PCBA. The impact of the blockage is a degradation in the accuracy of the resulting position. This can manifest itself in the lack of an ability to retrieve a position, or even worse, a false position report. A false position report can lead to a false “correction” being applied to an animal within a wireless containment system. If the area of obstruction is near a boundary, it could even allow an animal to escape the containment system, endangering the animal's wellbeing.
Various transceiver/antenna placement configurations are described below and are each designed to mitigate RF blockage. The transceivers/antennas in the examples below are positioned 20 cm from each other in a manner similar to the configuration shown in
FGS. 21 and 22 show antennas 2215 within the base unit mounted on small individual PCBAs 2210 captured by the enclosure. Each transceiver/antenna/PCBA mount is connected to a system processing unit PCBA 2220 and power source 2230 with cables. The system processing unit PCBA 2220 is mounted above the transceivers.
Each transceiver/antenna is mounted on a small PCBA. The PCBA comprising the system processing unit (SPU) is located above transceiver PCBAs. The system processing unit PCBA is held in place within a low dielectric loss factor enclosure (likely a plastic) by a material with a low dielectric loss factor. The SPU communicates with the transceivers via cables. These cables also distribute power throughout the base unit. The precise positioning of the transceivers within the base unit are critical to the calculations of the positional determination of the pet transceiver. To accomplish this requirement, the transceivers are precisely captured within the low dielectric loss factor enclosure by a material with a low dielectric loss factor. This approach allows the RF energy to pass relatively unimpeded between the transceivers within the base unit to the transceiver on the pet.
If the implementation is powered by mains power, the power cables can enter the enclosure from the top or bottom. If the implementation is battery powered, the power source could be mounted on the top of the enclosure above the SPU PCBA.
Each transceiver/antenna is mounted on a small PCBA. The PCBA comprising the system processing unit (SPU) is located below transceiver PCBAs. The system processing unit PCBA is held in place within a low dielectric loss factor enclosure (likely a plastic) by a material with a low dielectric loss factor. The SPU communicates with the transceivers via cables. These cables also distribute power throughout the base unit. The precise positioning of the transceivers within the base unit are critical to the calculations of the positional determination of the pet transceiver. To accomplish this requirement, the transceivers are precisely captured within the low dielectric loss factor enclosure by a material with a low dielectric loss factor. This approach allows the RF energy to pass unimpeded between the transceivers within the base unit to the transceiver on the pet.
If the implementation is powered by mains power, the power cables can enter the enclosure from the top or bottom. If the implementation is battery powered, the power source could be mounted on the top of the enclosure above the SPU PCBA.
Further re:
Under an embodiment, all RF switches are set either to top or bottom based on success of the prior communication sequence between the base unit transceivers and remote transceiver. Signal quality may be used to select top or bottom position. Signal quality may be assessed using a Standard Deviation of Channel Impulse Response Estimate (CIRE) Noise value. With a higher absolute CIRE noise figure, it is more likely that the quality of receive timestamp is poorer. High noise may mean that the real first path is irretrievably buried in the noise. Signal quality may also be assessed using a received power figure estimate. This is a calculation based on Channel impulse response power value and preamble accumulation count value. These values (CIRE and received power figure estimate) are reported by the transceivers for use in assessing signal quality.
With respect to each transceiver, a processor of the base unit implements the following operation, under an embodiment.
Under an embodiment, each RF switch is independently set either to top or bottom based on success of the prior communication sequence between the base unit and remote transceiver. With respect to each transceiver, a processor of the base unit implements the following operation, under an embodiment.
This step is repeated for transceiver 2/transceiver 2 antenna choice flag . . . through . . . transceiver n/transceiver n antenna choice flag (n=number of transceivers in base unit).
Under an embodiment, antennas 2510 only extend from an upper surface of the PCBA. As one example, each such antenna may comprise a transceiver portion extending 30 min from the PCBA and an antenna portion extending an additional 35 mm. This embodiment eliminates the need for an RF switch.
A device is described that comprises under an embodiment a base unit including a first transceiver, a second receiver, and a third receiver, wherein the first transceiver comprises a first antenna, the second receiver comprises a second antenna, and the third receiver comprises a third antenna, wherein the first transceiver, the second receiver, and the third receiver are communicatively coupled with at least one processor of the base unit, wherein the base unit comprises a clock that synchronizes communications of the first transceiver, the second receiver, and the third receiver, wherein the first transceiver, the second receiver, and the third receiver comprise vertices of a triangle. The base unit includes the first transceiver configured to transmit a communication to a transceiver remote to the base unit. The base unit includes the first transceiver, the second receiver, and the third receiver configured to receive a response from the transceiver, wherein the response comprises a return communication. The base unit includes the at least one processor configured to use information of the return communication to determine a first time of flight, wherein the first time of flight comprises the time elapsed between transmission of the return communication and the receiving of the return communication by the first transceiver. The base unit includes the at least one processor configured to use the first time of flight to determine a first distance between the first transceiver and the transceiver. The base unit includes the at least one processor configured to use the clock to determine a time difference of arrival between the first transceiver receiving the return communication, the second receiver receiving the return communication, and the third receiver receiving the return communication. The base unit includes the at least one processor configured to determine an angular value using information of the time difference of arrival, the relative positioning of the first antenna, the second antenna, and the third antenna and signal transmission speed of the return communication, wherein the angular value comprises an angle between a reference direction and an axis, wherein the angular value and the first distance approximate a location of the transceiver.
The triangle of an embodiment comprises an equilateral triangle.
Sides of the equilateral triangle are equal to or less than 20 cm, under an embodiment.
The at least one processor of an embodiment is configured to determine the time difference of arrival using the difference in phase of a carrier signal of the return communication among the first transceiver, the second receiver, and the third receiver.
The reference direction of an embodiment comprises a fixed unit vector originating at a vertex of the triangle and extending along a side of the triangle.
The vertices of the triangle approximately define a plane, wherein a plurality of quadrants partition the plane into radial segments extending from the base unit, under an embodiment.
The information of the time difference of arrival comprises an order of reception between the initial two antennas receiving the return communication, under an embodiment.
The determining the angular value includes using the order of reception between the initial two antennas to locate the transceiver in a quadrant of the plurality of quadrants, under an embodiment.
The determining the angular value includes under an embodiment constructing a right triangle, wherein the initial two antennas comprise vertices of the right triangle, wherein a first side of the right triangle is oriented in a direction of the transceiver in the quadrant, wherein a second side comprises a line between the initial two antennas.
The determining the angular value includes under an embodiment determining a first length of the first side using the signal transmission speed and the time difference of arrival between the initial two antennas receiving the return communication.
A second length comprises a length of the second side, under an embodiment.
The determining the angular value comprises under an embodiment determining the angular value using the first length, the second length, and information of the quadrant.
The transceiver of an embodiment is communicatively coupled with a stimulus unit positioned in a collar worn by an animal.
The at least one processor of an embodiment is configured to identify at least one instruction using the first distance and the angular value.
The at least one instruction of an embodiment includes logging the first distance and the angular value.
The identifying the at least one instruction includes transmitting the at least one instruction to the transceiver, under an embodiment.
The at least one instruction includes an instruction to apply a positive stimulus, under an embodiment.
The at least one instruction includes an instruction to apply a negative stimulus, under an embodiment.
A device is described that comprises under an embodiment a base unit including at least three transceivers, wherein the at least three transceivers are communicatively coupled with at least one processor of the base unit, wherein the base unit comprises a clock that synchronizes communications of the at least three transceivers. The device includes a first transceiver of the at least three transceivers configured to transmit a communication to a transceiver remote to the base unit. The device includes the at least three transceivers configured to receive a response from the transceiver, wherein the response comprises a return communication. The device includes the at least one processor configured to use information of the return communication to determine a first time of flight, wherein the first time of flight comprises the time elapsed between transmission of the return communication and the receiving of the return communication by the first transceiver. The device includes the at least one processor configured to use the first time of flight to determine a first distance between the first transceiver and the transceiver. The device includes the at least one processor configured to use the clock to determine a time difference of arrival among the at least three transceivers receiving the return communication. The device includes the at least one processor configured to determine an angular value using information of the time difference of arrival, the relative positioning of the at least three transceivers and signal transmission speed of the return communication, wherein the angular value comprises an angle between a reference direction and an axis, wherein the angular value and the first distance approximate a location of the transceiver.
A device is described herein comprising under an embodiment a base unit including at least three transceivers located on a printed circuit board assembly, wherein the at least three transceivers are communicatively coupled with at least one processor of the base unit, wherein the base unit comprises a clock that synchronizes communications of the at least three transceivers, wherein each transceiver of the at least three transceivers comprises an upper surface antenna extending from an upper surface of the printed circuit board assembly and a lower surface antenna extending from a lower surface of the printed circuit board assembly, wherein a location of each upper surface antenna on an upper surface of the printed circuit board assembly is mirrored by a location of the corresponding lower surface antenna on the lower surface of the printed circuit board assembly. Each transceiver of the at least three transceivers is configured to transmit a communication to a transceiver remote to the base unit, wherein the at least one processor is configured to instruct a first transceiver of the at least three transceivers to transmit at least one communication to the remote transceiver. Each transceiver of the at least three transceivers is configured to receive return communications from the remote transceiver in response to the at least one communication through at least one of the corresponding upper surface antenna and the corresponding lower surface antenna. The at least one processor is configured to use information of the return communications to determine a first time of flight, wherein the first time of flight comprises the time elapsed between transmission of a return communication of the return communications and the receiving of the return communication by the first transceiver. The at least one processor is configured to use the first time of flight to determine a first distance between the first transceiver and the remote transceiver. The at least one processor is configured to use the clock to determine a time difference of arrival between the first transceiver receiving the return communication, a second transceiver of the at least three transceivers receiving the return communication, and a third transceiver of the at least three transceivers receiving the return communication, wherein the first transceiver, the second transceiver, and the third transceiver comprise a triangle. The at least one processor is configured to determine an angular value using information of the time difference of arrival, the relative positioning of the first transceiver, the second transceiver, and the third transceiver, and signal transmission speed of the return communication, wherein the angular value comprises an angle between a reference direction and an axis, wherein the angular value and the first distance approximate a location of the remote transceiver.
The triangle comprises an equilateral triangle, under an embodiment.
The sides of the equilateral triangle are equal to or less than 20 cm, under an embodiment.
The printed circuit board assembly of an embodiment occupies a plane approximately parallel to ground.
Each upper surface antenna extends 35 mm from the upper surface of the printed circuit board assembly, under an embodiment.
Each lower surface antenna extends 35 mm from the lower surface of the printed circuit board assembly, under an embodiment.
Each transceiver of the at least three transceivers is located between the corresponding upper surface antenna and the corresponding lower surface antenna, under an embodiment.
Each transceiver comprises a radio frequency switch (RF switch), wherein each RF switch comprises a radio frequency flag position (RF flag position), wherein the RF flag position comprises either an upper position or lower position, under an embodiment.
The receiving the return communications includes each transceiver receiving the return communications from the corresponding upper surface antenna when the corresponding RF flag position is set to the upper position, under an embodiment.
The receiving the return communications includes each transceiver receiving the return communications from the corresponding lower surface antenna when the corresponding RF flag position is set to the lower position, under an embodiment, under an embodiment.
The at least one processor is configured to monitor signal quality of the return communications received through the upper surface antenna and the corresponding lower surface antenna for each transceiver of the at least three transceivers, under an embodiment.
The at least one processor is configured to independently set the RF flag position for each transceiver of the at least three transceivers to the upper position when the signal quality of the return communications received through the corresponding upper surface antenna is greater than the signal quality of the return communications received through the corresponding lower surface antenna, under an embodiment.
The at least one processor is configured to independently set the RF flag position for each transceiver of the at least three transceivers to the lower position when the signal quality of the return communications received through the corresponding lower surface antenna is greater than the signal quality of the return communications received through the corresponding upper surface antenna, under an embodiment.
The at least one processor is configured to uniformly set all RF flag positions of all transceivers of the at least three transceivers to either the upper position or the lower position, under an embodiment.
The at least one processor is configured to toggle the RF flag position for all transceivers of the at least three transceivers when signal quality of the return communications received through currently selected antennas fall below a threshold value for a defined number of transceivers, under an embodiment.
The at least one processor is configured to determine the time difference of arrival using the difference in phase of a carrier signal of the return communication among the first transceiver, the second transceiver, and the third transceiver, under an embodiment.
The reference direction comprises a fixed unit vector originating at a vertex of the triangle and extending along a side of the triangle, under an embodiment.
The vertices of the triangle define a plane, wherein a plurality of quadrants partition the plane into radial segments extending from the base unit, under an embodiment.
The information of the time difference of arrival comprises an order of reception between the initial two transceivers of the first transceiver, the second transceiver, and the third transceiver receiving the return communication, under an embodiment.
The determining the angular value includes using the order of reception between the initial two transceivers to locate the remote transceiver in a quadrant of the plurality of quadrants.
The determining the angular value includes constructing a right triangle, wherein the initial two transceivers comprise vertices of the right triangle, wherein a first side of the right triangle is oriented in a direction of the remote transceiver in the quadrant, wherein a second side comprises a line between the initial two transceivers, under an embodiment.
The determining the angular value includes determining a first length of the first side using the signal transmission speed and the time difference of arrival between the initial two transceivers receiving the return communication, under an embodiment.
A second length comprises a length of the second side, under an embodiment.
The determining the angular value comprises determining the angular value using the first length, the second length, and information of the quadrant, under an embodiment.
The remote transceiver is communicatively coupled with a stimulus unit positioned in a collar worn by an animal, under an embodiment.
The at least one processor is configured to identify at least one instruction using the first distance and the angular value, under an embodiment.
The at least one instruction includes logging the first distance and the angular value, under an embodiment.
The identifying the at least one instruction includes transmitting the at least one instruction to the remote transceiver, under an embodiment.
The at least one instruction includes an instruction to apply a positive stimulus, under an embodiment.
The at least one instruction includes an instruction to apply a negative stimulus, under an embodiment.
A device is described herein comprising under an embodiment a base unit including a first transceiver, a second receiver, and a third receiver located on a printed circuit board assembly, wherein the first transceiver, the second receiver, and the third receiver are communicatively coupled with at least one processor of the base unit, wherein the base unit comprises a clock that synchronizes communications of the first transceiver, the second receiver, and the third receiver, wherein each of the first transceiver, the second receiver, and the third receiver comprises an upper surface antenna extending from an upper surface of the printed circuit board assembly and a lower surface antenna extending from a lower surface of the printed circuit board assembly, wherein a location of each upper surface antenna on an upper surface of the printed circuit board assembly is mirrored by a location of the corresponding lower surface antenna on the lower surface of the printed circuit board assembly. The transceiver is configured to transmit a communication to a transceiver remote to the base unit, wherein the at least one processor is configured to instruct the first transceiver to transmit at least one communication to the remote transceiver. The first transceiver, the second receiver, and the third receiver are configured to receive return communications from the remote transceiver in response to the at least one communication through at least one of the corresponding upper surface antenna and the corresponding lower surface antenna, wherein the first transceiver, the second receiver, and the third receiver comprise a triangle. The at least one processor is configured to use information of the return communications to determine a first time of flight, wherein the first time of flight comprises the time elapsed between transmission of a return communication of the return communications and the receiving of the return communication by the first transceiver. The at least one processor is configured to use the first time of flight to determine a first distance between the first transceiver and the remote transceiver. The at least one processor is configured to use the clock to determine a time difference of arrival between the first transceiver receiving the return communication, the second receiver receiving the return communication, and the third receiver receiving the return communication. The at least one processor is configured to determine an angular value using information of the time difference of arrival, the relative positioning of the first transceiver, the second receiver, and the third receiver, and signal transmission speed of the return communication, wherein the angular value comprises an angle between a reference direction and an axis, wherein the angular value and the first distance approximate a location of the remote transceiver.
Computer networks suitable for use with the embodiments described herein include local area networks (LAN), wide area networks (WAN), Internet, or other connection services and network variations such as the world wide web, the public internet, a private internet, a private computer network, a public network, a mobile network, a cellular network, a value-added network, and the like. Computing devices coupled or connected to the network may be any microprocessor controlled device that permits access to the network, including terminal devices, such as personal computers, workstations, servers, mini computers, main-frame computers, laptop computers, mobile computers, palm top computers, hand held computers, mobile phones, TV set-top boxes, or combinations thereof. The computer network may include one of more LANs, WANs, Internets, and computers. The computers may serve as servers, clients, or a combination thereof.
The wireless pet containment system using a single base unit can be a component of a single system, multiple systems, and/or geographically separate systems. The wireless pet containment system using a single base unit can also be a subcomponent or subsystem of a single system, multiple systems, and/or geographically separate systems. The components of wireless pet containment system using a single base unit can be coupled to one or more other components (not shown) of a host system or a system coupled to the host system.
One or more components of the wireless pet containment system using a single base unit and/or a corresponding interface, system or application to which the wireless pet containment system using a single base unit is coupled or connected includes and/or runs under and/or in association with a processing system. The processing system includes any collection of processor-based devices or computing devices operating together, or components of processing systems or devices, as is known in the art. For example, the processing system can include one or more of a portable computer, portable communication device operating in a communication network, and/or a network server. The portable computer can be any of a number and/or combination of devices selected from among personal computers, personal digital assistants, portable computing devices, and portable communication devices, but is not so limited. The processing system can include components within a larger computer system.
The processing system of an embodiment includes at least one processor and at least one memory device or subsystem. The processing system can also include or be coupled to at least one database. The term “processor” as generally used herein refers to any logic processing unit, such as one or more central processing units (CPUs), digital signal processors (DSPs), application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC), etc. The processor and memory can be monolithically integrated onto a single chip, distributed among a number of chips or components, and/or provided by some combination of algorithms. The methods described herein can be implemented in one or more of software algorithm(s), programs, firmware, hardware, components, circuitry, in any combination.
The components of any system that include the wireless pet containment system using a single base unit can be located together or in separate locations. Communication paths couple the components and include any medium for communicating or transferring files among the components. The communication paths include wireless connections, wired connections, and hybrid wireless/wired connections. The communication paths also include couplings or connections to networks including local area networks (LANs), metropolitan area networks (MANs), wide area networks (WANs), proprietary networks, interoffice or backend networks, and the Internet. Furthermore, the communication paths include removable fixed mediums like floppy disks, hard disk drives, and CD-ROM disks, as well as flash RAM, Universal Serial Bus (USB) connections, RS-232 connections, telephone lines, buses, and electronic mail messages.
Aspects of the wireless pet containment system using a single base unit and corresponding systems and methods described herein may be implemented as functionality programmed into any of a variety of circuitry, including programmable logic devices (PLDs), such as field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), programmable array logic (PAL) devices, electrically programmable logic and memory devices and standard cell-based devices, as well as application specific integrated circuits (ASICs). Some other possibilities for implementing aspects of the wireless pet containment system using a single base unit and corresponding systems and methods include: microcontrollers with memory (such as electronically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM)), embedded microprocessors, firmware, software, etc. Furthermore, aspects of the wireless pet containment system using a single base unit and corresponding systems and methods may be embodied in microprocessors having software-based circuit emulation, discrete logic (sequential and combinatorial), custom devices, fuzzy (neural) logic, quantum devices, and hybrids of any of the above device types. Of course the underlying device technologies may be provided in a variety of component types, e.g., metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) technologies like complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS), bipolar technologies like emitter-coupled logic (ECL), polymer technologies (e.g., silicon-conjugated polymer and metal-conjugated polymer-metal structures), mixed analog and digital, etc.
It should be noted that any system, method, and/or other components disclosed herein may be described using computer aided design tools and expressed (or represented), as data and/or instructions embodied in various computer-readable media, in terms of their behavioral, register transfer, logic component, transistor, layout geometries, and/or other characteristics. Computer-readable media in which such formatted data and/or instructions may be embodied include, but are not limited to, non-volatile storage media in various forms (e.g., optical, magnetic or semiconductor storage media) and carrier waves that may be used to transfer such formatted data and/or instructions through wireless, optical, or wired signaling media or any combination thereof. Examples of transfers of such formatted data and/or instructions by carrier waves include, but are not limited to, transfers (uploads, downloads, e-mail, etc.) over the Internet and/or other computer networks via one or more data transfer protocols (e.g., HTTP, FTP, SMTP, etc.). When received within a computer system via one or more computer-readable media, such data and/or instruction-based expressions of the above described components may be processed by a processing entity (e.g., one or more processors) within the computer system in conjunction with execution of one or more other computer programs.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in a sense of “including, but not limited to.” Words using the singular or plural number also include the plural or singular number respectively. Additionally, the words “herein,” “hereunder,” “above,” “below,” and words of similar import, when used in this application, refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. When the word “or” is used in reference to a list of two or more items, that word covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list and any combination of the items in the list.
The above description of embodiments of the wireless pet containment system using a single base unit is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the systems and methods to the precise forms disclosed. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the wireless pet containment system using a single base unit and corresponding systems and methods are described herein for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the systems and methods, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. The teachings of the wireless pet containment system using a single base unit and corresponding systems and methods provided herein can be applied to other systems and methods, not only for the systems and methods described above.
The elements and acts of the various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. These and other changes can be made to the wireless pet containment system using a single base unit and corresponding systems and methods in light of the above detailed description.
This application is a continuation in part application of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/715,420, filed Dec. 16, 2019, which is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/003,876, filed Jun. 8, 2018, which claims the benefit of U.S. Application No. 62/599,248, filed Dec. 15, 2017. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Application No. 63/078,494, filed Sep. 15, 2020.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2364994 | Moore | Dec 1944 | A |
2741224 | Putnam | Apr 1956 | A |
3182211 | Maratuech et al. | May 1965 | A |
3184730 | Irish | May 1965 | A |
3500373 | Arthur | Mar 1970 | A |
3735757 | Mac Farland | May 1973 | A |
4180013 | Smith | Dec 1979 | A |
4426884 | Polchaninoff | Jan 1984 | A |
4783646 | Matsuzaki | Nov 1988 | A |
4794402 | Gonda et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4802482 | Gonda et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4947795 | Farkas | Aug 1990 | A |
4969418 | Jones | Nov 1990 | A |
5054428 | Farkus | Oct 1991 | A |
5159580 | Andersen et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5161485 | McDade | Nov 1992 | A |
5182032 | Dickie et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5207178 | McDade et al. | May 1993 | A |
5207179 | Arthur et al. | May 1993 | A |
5471954 | Gonda et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5526006 | Akahane et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5559498 | Westrick et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5576972 | Harrison | Nov 1996 | A |
5586521 | Kelley | Dec 1996 | A |
5601054 | So | Feb 1997 | A |
5642690 | Calabrese et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5749324 | Moore | May 1998 | A |
5794569 | Titus et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5810747 | Brudny et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815077 | Christiansen | Sep 1998 | A |
5844489 | Yarnall, Jr. et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857433 | Files | Jan 1999 | A |
5870029 | Otto et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872516 | Bonge, Jr. | Feb 1999 | A |
5886669 | Kita | Mar 1999 | A |
5913284 | Van Curen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5923254 | Brune | Jul 1999 | A |
5927233 | Mainini et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933079 | Frink | Aug 1999 | A |
5934225 | Williams | Aug 1999 | A |
5949350 | Girard et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957983 | Tominaga | Sep 1999 | A |
5982291 | Williams et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6016100 | Boyd et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6019066 | Taylor | Feb 2000 | A |
6028531 | Wanderlich | Feb 2000 | A |
6047664 | Lyerly | Apr 2000 | A |
6067018 | Skelton et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075443 | Schepps et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6166643 | Janning et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170439 | Duncan et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184790 | Gerig | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196990 | Zicherman | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204762 | Dering et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215314 | Frankewich, Jr. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230031 | Barber | May 2001 | B1 |
6230661 | Yarnall, Jr. et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232880 | Anderson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6271757 | Touchton et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6297766 | Koeller | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6327999 | Gerig | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6353390 | Beri et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360697 | Williams | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360698 | Stapelfeld et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6404338 | Koslar | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415742 | Lee et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426464 | Spellman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427079 | Schneider et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6431121 | Mainini et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6431122 | Westrick et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441778 | Durst et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459378 | Gerig | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6487992 | Hollis | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6561137 | Oakman | May 2003 | B2 |
6581546 | Dalland et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6588376 | Groh | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598563 | Kim et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6600422 | Barry et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6637376 | Lee et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6657544 | Barry et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6668760 | Groh et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6700492 | Touchton et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6747555 | Fellenstein et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6798887 | Andre | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6799537 | Liao | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6807720 | Brune et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6820025 | Bachmann et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825768 | Stapelfeld et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6830012 | Swan | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6833790 | Mejia et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6874447 | Kobett | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888502 | Beigel et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6901883 | Gillis et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6903682 | Maddox | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6907844 | Crist et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6907883 | Lin | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6921089 | Groh et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6923146 | Korbitz et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6928958 | Crist et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937647 | Boyd et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6956483 | Schmitt et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6970090 | Sciarra | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7061385 | Fong et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7079024 | Alarcon et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7114466 | Mayer | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7142167 | Rochelle et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7164354 | Panzer | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7173535 | Bach et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7198009 | Crist et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7222589 | Lee, IV et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7249572 | Goetzl et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7252051 | Napolez et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7259718 | Patterson et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7267081 | Steinbacher | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7275502 | Boyd et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7296540 | Boyd | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7319397 | Chung et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7328671 | Kates | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7339474 | Easley et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7382328 | Lee, IV et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7394390 | Gerig | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7395966 | Braiman | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7403744 | Bridgelall | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7404379 | Nottingham et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7411492 | Greenberg et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7426906 | Nottingham et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7434541 | Kates | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7443298 | Cole | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7477155 | Bach et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7503285 | Mainini et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7518275 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7518522 | So | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7538679 | Shanks | May 2009 | B2 |
7546817 | Moore | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7552699 | Moore | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7559291 | Reinhart | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7562640 | Lalor | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7565885 | Moore | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7574979 | Nottingham et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7583931 | Eu et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7602302 | Hokuf et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7612668 | Harvey | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7616124 | Paessel et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7656291 | Rochelle et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7658166 | Rheinschmidt, Jr. et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7667599 | Mainini et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7667607 | Gerig et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7680645 | Li et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7705736 | Kedziora | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7710263 | Boyd | May 2010 | B2 |
7760137 | Martucci et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7779788 | Moore | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7786876 | Troxler et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7804724 | Way | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7814865 | Tracy et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7828221 | Kwon | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7830257 | Hassell | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7834769 | Hinkle et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7841301 | Mainini et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7856947 | Giunta | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7864057 | Milnes et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7868912 | Venetianer et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7900585 | Lee et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918190 | Belcher et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7944359 | Fong et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7946252 | Lee, IV et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7978078 | Copeland et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7996983 | Lee et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8011327 | Mainini et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8047161 | Moore et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8049630 | Chao et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8065978 | Duncan et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8069823 | Mainini et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8098164 | Gerig et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8159355 | Gerig et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8161915 | Kim | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8185345 | Mainini | May 2012 | B2 |
8232909 | Kroeger et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8240085 | Hill | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8269504 | Gerig | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8274396 | Gurley et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8297233 | Rich et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8342134 | Lee et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8342135 | Peinetti et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8430064 | Groh et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8436735 | Mainini et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8447510 | Fitzpatrick et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8451130 | Mainini | May 2013 | B2 |
8456296 | Piltonen et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8483262 | Mainini et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8714113 | Lee, IV et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8715824 | Rawlings et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8736499 | Goetzl et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8779925 | Rich et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8803692 | Goetzl et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8807089 | Brown et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8823513 | Jameson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8854215 | Ellis et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8866605 | Gibson | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8908034 | Bordonaro | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8917172 | Charych | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8947240 | Mainini | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8967085 | Gillis et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9035773 | Petersen et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9125380 | Deutsch | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9131660 | Womble | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9186091 | Mainini et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9204251 | Mendelson et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9307745 | Mainini | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9516863 | Gerig et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9861076 | Rochelle et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10514439 | Seltzer | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10757672 | Knas et al. | Aug 2020 | B1 |
10879600 | Kim | Dec 2020 | B2 |
20020010390 | Guice et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015094 | Kuwano et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020036569 | Martin | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020092481 | Spooner | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020196151 | Troxler | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030034887 | Crabtree | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030035051 | Cho et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030116099 | Kim et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030154928 | Lee et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030218539 | Hight | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040108939 | Giunta | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040162875 | Brown | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040263322 | Onaru et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050000469 | Giunta et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050007251 | Crabtree et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050020279 | Markhovsky et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050035865 | Brennan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050059909 | Burgess | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050081797 | Laitinen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050139169 | So et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050145196 | Crist et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050145199 | Napolez et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050148346 | Maloney et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050172912 | Crist et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050217606 | Lee et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050231353 | DiPoala et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050254663 | Raptopoulos et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050258715 | Schlabach et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050280544 | Mishelevich | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050280546 | Ganley et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288007 | Benco et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060000015 | Duncan | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060011145 | Kates et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060037559 | Belcher | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060061469 | Jaeger et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060092676 | Liptak et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060102100 | Becker et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060102101 | Kim | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112901 | Gomez | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060196445 | Kates | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060197672 | Talamas, Jr. et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070011339 | Brown | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070197878 | Shklarski | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204803 | Ramsay | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070204804 | Swanson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070209604 | Groh et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070249470 | Niva et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070266959 | Brooks et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080004539 | Ross | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080055155 | Hensley et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058670 | Mainini et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080061978 | Huang | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080119757 | Winter | May 2008 | A1 |
20080129457 | Ritter et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080141949 | Taylor | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080143516 | Mock et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080156277 | Mainini et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080163827 | Goetzl | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186167 | Ramachandra | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080204322 | Oswald et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080216766 | Martin et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080236514 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080252527 | Garcia | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090000566 | Kim | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090002188 | Greenberg | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012355 | Lin | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090020002 | Williams et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090025651 | Lalor | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031966 | Kates | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090061772 | Moon et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082830 | Folkerts et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090102668 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112284 | Smith et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090129338 | Horn et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090224909 | Derrick et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090239586 | Boeve et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090289644 | Palsgrove et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090289785 | Leonard | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299742 | Toman | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100008011 | Ogram | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100019903 | Sawaya | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100047119 | Cressy | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049384 | Landry et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100107985 | O'Hare | May 2010 | A1 |
20100139576 | Kim et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100201525 | Bahat et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100231391 | Dror et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100238022 | Au et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100315241 | Jow | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100321180 | Dempsey et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110140967 | Lopez et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110182438 | Koike et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110203529 | Mainini et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120000431 | Khoshkish et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120006282 | Kates | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120032655 | Reede | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120037088 | Altenhofen | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120078139 | Aldridge et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120087204 | Urbano et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120132151 | Touchton et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120165012 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120236688 | Spencer et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120312250 | Jesurum | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130099920 | Song et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130099922 | Lohbihler | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130157564 | Curtis et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130169441 | Wilson | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130181861 | Zohar | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130203027 | De Villers-Sidani et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130321159 | Schofield et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130340305 | Mobley | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140020635 | Sayers et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140053788 | Riddell | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140057232 | Wetmore et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140062695 | Rosen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140069350 | Riddell | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140073939 | Rodriguez-Llorente et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140120943 | Shima | May 2014 | A1 |
20140123912 | Menkes et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140132608 | Mund et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140174376 | Touchton et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140176305 | Aljadeff | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140228649 | Rayner et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140228927 | Ahmad et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140253368 | Holder | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140253389 | Beauregard | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140261235 | Rich et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140265568 | Crafts et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267299 | Couse | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140275824 | Couse et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276278 | Smith et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140307888 | Alderson et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140343599 | Smith et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140358592 | Wedig et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150040840 | Muetzel et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150043744 | Lagodzinski et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150053144 | Bianchi et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150075446 | Hu | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150080013 | Venkatraman et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150107531 | Golden | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150149111 | Kelly et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150163412 | Holley et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150172872 | Alsehly et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150199490 | Iancu et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150223013 | Park et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150289111 | Ozkan et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150350848 | Eramian | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150358768 | Luna et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160015005 | Brown, Jr. et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160021506 | Bonge, Jr. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160021850 | Stapelfeld et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160029466 | DeMao et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160044444 | Rattner et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160084801 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094419 | Peacock et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160102879 | Guest et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160125867 | Jarvinen et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160150362 | Shaprio et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160174099 | Goldfain | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160178392 | Goldfain | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160187454 | Orman et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160234649 | Finnerty et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160253987 | Chattell | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160292635 | Todasco | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160335917 | Lydecker et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160363664 | Mindell et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160366813 | Haneda et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170026798 | Prevatt | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170212205 | Bialer et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170323630 | Stickney et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180027772 | Gordon et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180077509 | Jones et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180078735 | Dalgleish et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180094451 | Peter et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180188351 | Jones et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180190311 | Kato et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180210704 | Jones et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180234134 | Tang et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180235182 | Bocknek | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180249680 | Van Curen et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180303066 | Weimin et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180315262 | Love | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190013003 | Baughman et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190066651 | Yang | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190110430 | Badiou | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190165832 | Khanduri et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20200367810 | Shouldice et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101937015 | Jan 2011 | CN |
101112181 | Nov 2012 | CN |
102793568 | Dec 2014 | CN |
H0974774 | Mar 1997 | JP |
20130128704 | Nov 2013 | KR |
20180059684 | Jun 2018 | KR |
101911312 | Jan 2019 | KR |
WO-02060240 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO-2006000015 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO-2008085812 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO-2008140992 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO-2009105243 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO-2009106896 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO-2011055004 | May 2011 | WO |
WO-2011136816 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO-2011160698 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO-2012122607 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO-2015015047 | Feb 2015 | WO |
WO-2016204799 | Dec 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ayele E., et al., “Highly Energy Efficient Animal Mobility Driven BLE Beacon Advertising Control for Wildlife Monitoring,” IEEE Xplore, 2020, 8 pages. |
Baba A. I., et al., “Calibrating Time of Flight in Two Way Ranging,” IEEE Xplore Digital Library, Dec. 2011, pp. 393-397. |
Crutchfield., “What You Need to Know About Sound Masking,” 2021, pp. 1-7. |
Eileen A., “How To Protect Your Dog From Loud and Scary Sounds,” 2013, pp. 1-8. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP17180645, dated May 9, 2018, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18738816, dated Sep. 29, 2020, 10 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 11784149.4, dated Nov. 17, 2017, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15735439.0, dated Oct. 18, 2017, 9 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15895839.7, dated Oct. 9, 2018, 5 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 17162289.7, dated Aug. 31, 2017, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18738547.1, dated Sep. 24, 2020, 9 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18738743.6, dated Sep. 24, 2020, 11 pages. |
High Tech Products, Inc., “Human Contain Model X-10 Rechargeable Multi-function Electronic Dog Fence Ultra-system,” Internet citation, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20120112221915/http://hightechpet.com/user_Manuals/HC%20X-10_Press.pdf [retrieved on Apr. 10, 2017], Apr. 28, 2012, pp. 1-32, XP008184171. |
Info Unlimited “Canine 10RC-HP10 Instructions,” Instruction manual V.0420; Publication 12 & 15 [online]. Jun. 14, 2013 [retrieved Sep. 29, 2020]. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://www.amazing1.com/content/download/CANINE10_Instructions.pdf, 18 pages. |
Info Unlimited “Canine 10RC-HP10 Instructions,” Instruction manual V.0420: [Retrieved on Jul. 8, 2017]. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://www.amazing1.com/content/download/CANINE10_Instructions.pdf, 18 pages. |
Integrated Building System., “The What, Where, Why and How of Sound Masking,” 2016, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2020/042601, dated Nov. 9, 2020, 11 pages. |
International Preliminary Report for Patentability Chapter II for International Application No. PCT/US2014/024875, dated Mar. 12, 2015, 17 pages. |
Interational Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2015/043653, dated Dec. 19, 2017, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2018/013737, dated Mar. 7, 2018, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2018/013738, dated Mar. 20, 2018, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2018/013740, dated Mar. 20, 2018, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2018/019887, dated May 8, 2018, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2018/065122, dated Mar. 25, 2019, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2018/065154, dated Apr. 23. 2019, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2018/065938, dated Mar. 8, 2019, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2020/016617, dated Apr. 27, 2020, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/024875, dated Jun. 27, 2014, 12 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2014/020344, dated Jun. 5, 2014, 2 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2014/066650, dated Feb. 19, 2015, 3 pages (Outgoing). |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/010864, Form PCT/ISA/210 dated Apr. 13, 2015, 2 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/043653, Form PCT/ISA/210 dated Oct. 23, 2015, 2 pages. |
Jondhale S. R., et al., “Issues and Challenges in RSSI Based Target Localization and Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks,” International Conference on Automatic Control and Dynamic Optimization Techniques (ICACDOT), 2016, pp. 594-598. |
Joshi A., et al., “GPS-less Animal Tracking System,” Fourth International Conference on Wireless Communication and Sensor Networks, 2008, pp. 120-125. |
Kuo S., et al., “Detecting Movement of Beacons In Location-Tracking Wireless Sensor Networks,” IEEE 66th Vehicular Technology Conference, 2007, pp. 362-366. |
Kuo S., et al., “The Beacon Movement Detection Problem in Wireless Sensor Networks for Localization Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, Oct. 2009, vol. 8(10), pp. 1326-1338. |
Millner H., et al., “Wireless 3D Localization of Animals for Trait and Behavior Analysis in Indoor & Outdoor Areas,” IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop on Wireless Sensing, Local Positioning, and RFID, 2009, pp. 1-4. |
Nam M. et al., “Combined Scheduling of Sensing and Communication for Real-Time Indoor Tracking in Assisted Living,” IEEE Real Time System Symposium, 2007, 10 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority tor International Application No. PCT/US2015/043653, Form PCT/ISA/220 dated Oct. 23, 2015, 1 page. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and Written Opinion for the International Application No. PCT/US2014/066650, dated Feb. 19, 2015, 1 page. |
Panicker, G. J., et al., “A LoRa Wireless Mesh Network for Wide-Area Animal Tracking,” IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies, 2019, pp. 1-5. |
Radoi I.E., et al., “Tracking and Monitoring Horses in the Wild Using Wireless Sensor Networks,” IEEE International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications, 2015, 8 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 18887374.9, dated Aug. 10, 2021, 7 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 18888089.2, dated Aug. 6, 2021, 6 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 18889799.5, dated Aug. 13, 2021, 10 pages. |
Welch G., et al., “An Introduction to the Kalman Filter,” Department of Computer Science, Jul. 24, 2006, pp. 1-16. |
Wood D.J., “Speech Privacy & Sound Masking in Modern Architecture,” 2008, 51 pages. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/066650, dated Feb. 19, 2015, 15 pages(outgoing). |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/043653, Form PCT/ISA/237 dated Oct. 23, 2015, 13 pages. |
Written Opinion for the International Application No. PCT/US2015/010864, Form PCT/ISA/237 dated Apr. 13, 2015, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210208235 A1 | Jul 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63078494 | Sep 2020 | US | |
62599248 | Dec 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16003876 | Jun 2018 | US |
Child | 16715420 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16715420 | Dec 2019 | US |
Child | 17208714 | US |