Radiation protection in the medical field is very important. Procedures and therapies are designed to minimize patient radiation exposure while ensuring physicians and healthcare workers can effectively treat the patient. Attention is being paid, for example, to developing imaging machines that decrease patient radiation exposure by implementing lower radiation levels. Unfortunately, attention is often lagging for protecting healthcare workers such as physicians, nurses, technicians, and so forth from radiation exposure.
Healthcare workers can be exposed to radiation during patient procedures. For example, a physician's hands can be exposed to radiation from imaging machines while inserting a central line in a patient. Healthcare workers' cumulative radiation exposure can be significant as they can perform multiple procedures in a normal day. In the U.S. alone, estimates are that 293 million diagnostic and fluoroscopic procedures are performed annually. Radiology, 253:2—November 2009.
Physical barriers can limit radiation exposure. Radiation shielding and body wear are two types of physical barriers used to minimize radiation exposure. These physical barriers have drawbacks. Physical barriers typically are bulky and obtrusive. Physical barriers often times increase orthopedic stress on the person using the body wear and/or inhibit ergonomic efficiency. Lead aprons, one type of body wear, are heavy and place stress on the person's shoulders and neck. Some physicians and fluoroscopic room staff forego physical barriers to avoid one, or more, of these drawbacks. As a result, these personnel may be exposed to higher radiation levels in comparison to instances in which physical barriers are implemented.
Apparatus and techniques for blocking radiation in a medical environment are described. In one or more embodiments, a lock-block shield device includes a base that is configured to adhesively couple the device to an object associated with a patient. In some embodiments, the base includes a lock mechanism for securing a work piece, which may have a generally tubular shape. A shield configured to at least partially block electromagnetic radiation within a spectrum of wavelengths (e.g., x-ray radiation) can be coupled to the base. For example, a clasp can be used to secure the base and shield together. In embodiments, a stem with a malleable end is configured to be inserted into hole formed in the base to secure the base and shield together. In additional embodiments, a ball and socket joint couples the shield and base to permit, for example, the shield to pivot and articulate with respect to the base.
This Summary is provided solely to introduce subject matter that is fully described in the Detailed Description and Drawings. Accordingly, the Summary should not be considered to describe essential features nor be used to determine scope of the claims.
The detailed description is described with reference to the accompanying figures. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the figure in which the reference number first appears. The use of the same reference numbers in different instances in the description and the figures may indicate similar or identical items.
3B is exploded view of a lock-block shield device with a clasp-type connection that couples a shield and base in accordance with implementations of the present disclosure.
Overview
Physicians and medical personnel sometimes tradeoff radiation protection for ergonomic and procedural efficiency during interventional procedures. Physical barriers used to block radiation typically are heavy due to the presence of lead. Some physicians, for example, do not use or sparingly use physical barriers for radiation protection when inserting catheters or drains because these barriers interfere with workflow or cause orthopedic stress when performing the procedure. As a result, the physician may be exposed to a higher cumulative level of radiation than is recommended on a monthly basis.
Another drawback of physical barriers is that reusable physical barriers can act as a conduit for spreading pathogens between people including patients and medical personnel. A contaminated physical barrier can transmit pathogens such as multi-drug resistant skin pathogen (MRSA) between people. It may be inefficient to clean physical barriers between uses.
Accordingly, a lock-block shield device is configured to at least partially (e.g., partially, substantially, or completely) block potentially harmful radiation (e.g., radiation within a spectrum of wavelengths, such as x-ray radiation, that may be harmful to the human body when the human body is undesirably exposed to the radiation source) is described. In embodiments, the lock-block shield device is disposable or suitable for single use to avoid transmitting pathogens between patients.
In embodiments, the lock-block shield device includes a base and a shield for blocking radiation in medical situations. The base and shield are connected to one another by a clasp mechanism. The base is constructed to adhesively secure the device to an object, such as a patient or an object associated with the patient, and the shield can be positioned to block radiation. Thus, the lock-block shield device can be arranged to promote ergonomic activity and permit efficient work flow.
The shield and base, in embodiments, are coupled by a ball and socket joint to permit rotation of the shield with respect to the base. In examples, the shield is configured to articulate along an axis that is generally perpendicular to an axis through which the shield can be rotated. In additional examples, the shield and base are coupled by a fixating slot. Accordingly, the shield can be oriented and articulated to readily achieve a desired configuration that blocks radiation for a healthcare worker while minimizing procedural interference.
In embodiments, a lock-block shield device includes a lock mechanism, such as a clamp, for securing a work piece that is generally tubular, such as a catheter, drain, or other tube-like structure, to the base. In embodiments, the lock mechanism can be secured or released with and/or without removal of the shield. Thus, a user such as a physician or other health care worker can position or reposition a catheter while the shield is in place to block radiation directed to the physician.
Example Lock-Block Shield Devices
The lock-block shield device 100 can be positioned on a patient, for instance, so that it is adjacent to the patient's liver when inserting a bile drain using real-time x-ray imaging. In this manner, the device 100 can shield (e.g., protect) the healthcare worker's hands from the x-ray radiation while allowing the healthcare worker to position his/her hands in an ergonomically effective manner that does not disrupt the worker's workflow. Protecting portions of a healthcare worker's body adjacent to a source of radiation or an area being imaged with x-rays can be beneficial as radiation exposure decreases based on the square of the distance between the radiated area and the object, e.g., a physician's hands. A physician's hands can be exposed to nine times the radiation to which his/her torso is exposed while using real-time x-ray imaging. In examples, the radiation energy is in the rage of and/or approximately 100 KeV.
The base 102 as shown includes a flap 106 that is butterfly shaped and is formed of a plastic suitable for medical applications. Although a flap with a butterfly shape is illustrated, the flap's shape can be varied based on design preference. As illustrated, the flap 106 has a substantially flat surface 108 that allows it to rest on an object. The object can be a patient or an object associated with a patient, e.g., a table, a drape, or the like. In embodiments, the flap 106 is curved or is malleable. For example, the flap 106 is malleable to curve or bend to conform to a patient's torso.
The base 102 can be fabricated from a variety of materials. In embodiments, the base 102 is manufactured from a plastic. In further embodiments, the base and/or flap is formed from a wire or wire-type structure. For example, a metallic wire, coated with a medical grade plastic, may be shaped to form the flap, e.g., formed with a butterfly shape to function as a substantially flat surface on which the lock-block can rest. In implementations, the wire forming the base is malleable to conform to a curved surface. A variety of factors can be considered when selecting a plastic for the base 102. Factors include, but are not limited to, resistance to microbe/bacterial contamination, rigidity, thermal stability, likelihood for triggering an allergic reaction, the plastic's ability to be infused with a radiation blocking material (e.g., accept powdered barium) and the like.
As shown, the base 102 includes a protrusion 110 that extends generally away from the substantially flat surface 108. The protrusion 110 can be used to support the shield 104, to function as a stat lock, or for another purpose or combination of purposes. For example, the protrusion defines a slot 112 that is configured to receive a tube shaped work piece, e.g., a catheter, in order to secure it to the lock-block shield device 100.
In embodiments, the base 102 and/or flap 106 may have a profile that is ramped so that a portion of the base that is to hold the work piece, e.g., a drain, is spaced away from an object on which the base is placed. For example, the base may ramp from 3-5 millimeters to 6-10 millimeters. In embodiments, the protrusion is ramped. For example, the base 102 is substantially flat while the protrusion is ramped. Spacing the work piece away from the object can promote greater freedom of motion to adjust the work piece. The additional freedom may be attributed to the work piece being able to move in x-y directions with respect to the base. Thus, a healthcare worker may more easily adjust a hemostasis valve (an example work piece) by adjusting it in multiple directions.
A foam base 114 is attached to the flat surface 108 of the base illustrated in
In embodiments, the foam base 114 is formed of a dense foam with a thickness of in the range of 1 millimeter to 2.5 centimeters. In embodiments, the foam has a thickness of approximately 1 millimeter. The foam can be selected to minimize fluids from absorbing in the foam's voids, user comfort, flexibility, suitability as a substrate for the adhesive, a combination of factors, and so forth.
The adhesive can be selected from a variety of medical grade adhesives based on a variety of factors. For example, the adhesive is selected for its ability to adhere to a patient's skin or to a drape, while still permitting it to release with alcohol (e.g., ethyl alcohol). The adhesive may be chosen to resist water, blood, or other bodily fluids, minimize the likelihood of an allergic reaction by a patient, and so forth.
As shown, the base 102 has one or more apertures 116 that extend through the flap 106 and/or the foam base 112. The apertures 116 are configured for use in suturing the base 102 to an object. A medical worker such as a physician, for instance, can suture the base 102 to a patient's skin through one or more of the apertures in addition to adhere the base to the patient's skin, such as for a patient with an allergy to an adhesive. Other suitable mechanism for securing the base 102 include, but are not limited to, a suction device, one or more straps (e.g., adjustable straps).
As shown in
The lock mechanism 118 is at least partially housed in the protrusion 110. For example, the lock mechanism is positioned adjacent to a slot in the protrusion to hold a drain that is positioned lengthwise in the slot. The lock mechanism 118, in some embodiments, can accommodate side arms that are included on some work pieces. For example, the lock mechanism can hold a hemostasis valve with side arms that extend from the valve's main body. In this example, the lock mechanism 118 and/or the slot is formed with a channel or recess into which the side arms are received. Having described features of the base generally, an embodiment of a lock mechanism is now described.
Referring now to
In embodiments, the lock mechanism 118 is configured to secure and/or release without removal of the shield 104. For example, the clamp 220a is pressed to release or disengage a catheter without dissembling the shield 104 from the base 102. This configuration permits a healthcare worker to adjust the catheter while keeping the shield 104 in place to block radiation.
In implementations, a plug that blocks radiation is included with the lock-block shield device 100. The plug is configured to fit in the lock mechanism 118 and block radiation when no work piece is present. The plug may be used, for example, when the lock-block shield device 100 is used as a radiation shield for a barium swallow. In this example, the plug is inserted in the lock mechanism 118 to prevent radiation from passing through the slot.
Referring to
As illustrated in
The ball and socket joint can include one or more stops to limit the extent to which the shield/base can articulate. Stops can be included to limit the shield from articulating more than plus or minus 30°. Although a lock-block shield device can include a clasp and a ball and socket joint, in embodiments a ball and socket can function as a clasp. For example, the socket 324 is configured to snap-fit with a ball shaped structure 322 on the opposite component (e.g., the base or the shield) to clasp the base 102 and shield 104 together. For example, a wire ball or wire socket can be used to connect with the clasp (e.g., door hinge structure or locking top with a hole for a wire to obtain a snug fit).
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
Referring now to
Other suitable radiation blocking materials can be used as well including, but not limited to, tin or aluminum. In other embodiments, the plastic forming the shield can be infused with radiation blocking material, such as barium sulfate, a metal infused polymer (e.g., tantalum), that is mixed in the plastic. For example, the shield is formed of a plastic loaded with barium sulfate and/or tungsten. Barium sulfate may be selected because its weight is approximately two thirds or sixty-six percent (66%) that of lead. For example, a five by eight inch (5″×8″) sheet of barium sulfate and/or tungsten loaded plastic can weigh approximately one quarter of a pound (0.25 lbs).
As shown, the shield 104 includes a lip 328 that extends about at least a portion of the shield's periphery. For instance, the shield 104 includes an extension or is curved, e.g., is concave, to prevent liquids such as blood and other bodily fluids from contacting a healthcare worker. For example, the lip 328 extends from a major surface of the shield. The shield 104 can be positioned so the lip 328 is directed to, for example, a physician to prevent blood from splashing on a physician's hands positioned on an opposite side of the shield 104.
The shield, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure, is adjustable to expand or contract to vary the extent to which the shield blocks radiation. For example, the shield 104 can be formed in multiple sections that fan out like a deck of playing cards or a paper fan. In this example, the shield 104 is composed of multiple sections that can slide or pivot past one another to expand or contract the area blocked by the shield.
In other embodiments, a shield 104 may include a central section from which one or more wing sections pivot or slide out of or into. Accordingly, a user can pivot or slide the wings to/from the central section to adjust the extent to which the shield extends, e.g., a half circle or a three quarter circle. It is to be apparent that the structures, techniques, and approaches described with respect to
Example Methods
The following discussion describes methods that may be implemented in conjunction with a lock-block shield device described above. The methods are shown as a set of blocks that specify operations and are not necessarily limited to the order shown. In portions of the following discussion, reference may be made to the lock-block shield device 100 and/or its components. The techniques described below are independent of the structures described above, meaning that the techniques may be implemented in a variety of ways and are not necessarily limited to the structures illustrated in
As illustrated, a base is secured to an object (Block 402). The base may be secured to the object with an adhesive and/or a suture. The object in implementations is a patient or an object associated with a patient, such as a gown, a drape, or a table. For example, the base is sutured to the patient's gown to prevent it from coming loose.
A shield is attached with the base (Block 404). For example, the shield is snapped to the base using opposing structures included, respectively, on the base and shield. In embodiments, the shield attaches in a hinged manner and is secured in place by a friction tab that locks the opposing structures together. In other embodiments, a snap fit ball and socket joint is used to couple the base and shield together. For example, a ball may be press-fit into a socket formed by two or more fingers.
A shield is deployed (Block 406). The shield can be deployed depending on the situation to configure the shield to block radiation from contacting a healthcare worker treating a patient who is being exposed to at least some radiation. For example, the shield can be adjusted in a variety of ways based on the patient's position, the location of the radiation source, the healthcare worker's position, and so forth.
Optionally, a shield is rotated to orientate the shield (Block 408). For example, with the base secured, the shield is rotated to align the shield and prevent a physician's hands being exposed to radiation from an x-ray machine. The shield can be rotated 360° so the base can be placed in a manner that does not interfere with workflows and allow for ergonomic placement.
Optionally, a shield is articulated (Block 410). The shield can be articulated with respect to the base. For example, the shield 104 articulates +/−30° so it can be angled for a variety of factors. Example factors include, but are not limited to, the height and orientation of the patient, an x-ray source position, the position of the lock block shield device with respect to an area of interest, or a position of the physician or healthcare worker with respect to the lock-block shield device.
Optionally, the shield is adjusted to vary the extent to which the shield blocks radiation (Block 412). For example, the shield 104 can be adjusted to fan out in order to shield more area. Alternatively, the shield can be pivoted to contract the area that is shielded, e.g., by folding the shield's segments together. The shield, for instance, may extend approximately 180° when positioned on a table, but may fan-out to cover an angle of 225° when positioned on a patient's torso. In embodiments, segments forming the shield can pivot or slide past one another to expand to cover a greater portion or fold-up to decrease the shield's angular coverage orientation.
In embodiments, a lock mechanism is secured or released without removal of the shield (Block 414). For example, a lock mechanism 118 for securing a bile drain can be released without removing the shield 104 from the base 102 to which it is attached.
In embodiments, the shield is disposed of after a single use (Block 416). For example, the lock-block shield device including the shield is disposable to prevent pathogens from transferring between people such as patient and healthcare workers between uses. In additional embodiments, device or one of its components can be constructed so it can be sterilized for reuse.
Conclusion
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or process operations, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/022,104, filed Mar. 15, 2016 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,010,297), which application is a National Stage application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/US2014/056585, filed Sep. 19, 2014, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/880,216 filed Sep. 20, 2013. The disclosures of the prior applications are considered part of (and are incorporated by reference in) the disclosure of this application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1772478 | Came | Aug 1930 | A |
2497749 | Wagner | Feb 1950 | A |
2794128 | Shasky | May 1957 | A |
3016255 | Russel | Jan 1962 | A |
3172240 | Giardini et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3239669 | Weinberger | Mar 1966 | A |
3303717 | Valenti | Feb 1967 | A |
3409317 | Richards | Nov 1968 | A |
3883749 | Whittaker et al. | May 1975 | A |
4220867 | Bloch, Jr. | Sep 1980 | A |
4280056 | Renshaw | Jul 1981 | A |
4581538 | Lenhart | Apr 1986 | A |
4751747 | Banks et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
D300945 | Fleming | May 1989 | S |
4872714 | Brusasco | Oct 1989 | A |
4917413 | Jason et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4923162 | Fleming | May 1990 | A |
4938233 | Orrison, Jr. | Jul 1990 | A |
5016292 | Rademacher | May 1991 | A |
5090044 | Kobayashi | Feb 1992 | A |
5125115 | Lincoln | Jun 1992 | A |
RE34120 | Plahn | Nov 1992 | E |
5319349 | Smith | Jun 1994 | A |
D349577 | Sayles | Aug 1994 | S |
5398176 | Ahuja | Mar 1995 | A |
5417225 | Rubenstein | May 1995 | A |
5521803 | Eckert | May 1996 | A |
5522403 | Bark | Jun 1996 | A |
5523581 | Cadwalader | Jun 1996 | A |
5569090 | Hoskins et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5628062 | Tseng | May 1997 | A |
5638545 | Rosner | Jun 1997 | A |
5704662 | Kwiatkowski | Jan 1998 | A |
5711027 | Katz et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5949020 | Mitchell et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5981964 | McAuley | Nov 1999 | A |
5992823 | Hung-Lin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6135032 | Ko et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6217087 | Fuller et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6325538 | Heesch | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6394724 | Kelly et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6703632 | Macklis | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7099427 | Cadwalader | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7112811 | Lemer | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7188625 | Durette | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7226234 | Gordy et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7521615 | Ho et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7663128 | Arterson | Feb 2010 | B2 |
8015714 | Dekort et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8032994 | Waddell et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8298245 | Li | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8334524 | DeMeo et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8416513 | McPherson | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8445093 | Lemer | May 2013 | B2 |
8664628 | Yoder | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8674330 | Beck | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8835887 | Beck | Sep 2014 | B2 |
D716449 | Ballsieper | Oct 2014 | S |
8933426 | Rees | Jan 2015 | B2 |
D772415 | Ballsieper | Nov 2016 | S |
D775340 | Ballsieper | Dec 2016 | S |
9697920 | Gordon et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9728290 | Weed | Aug 2017 | B2 |
10010297 | Gordon | Jul 2018 | B2 |
20020174872 | Cyphers | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030132639 | Franklin | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030209387 | Burr | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040041107 | Cadwalader | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040169114 | Dierkes | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040183316 | Walls et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050023842 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050104435 | Bain et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060089626 | Vlegele | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070029513 | Treuth | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070120034 | Sparling | May 2007 | A1 |
20070297572 | Moritake et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080056813 | Viernekes | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080128297 | Rose | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080164425 | Cadwalader | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080182093 | Sonntag et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090045358 | Arterson | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090232282 | Belson et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100107320 | Rees | May 2010 | A1 |
20100176318 | Smith | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100249709 | Fischvogt | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100289718 | Kang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100304060 | Lemer | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110248193 | Goldstein | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110288489 | Bierman | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120051502 | Ohta | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120086530 | Rathbun | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120132217 | Rees | May 2012 | A1 |
20120241652 | Jeschke | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120246790 | Salcedo | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120272483 | Moore | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120324614 | Steinberg et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130144104 | Adler | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130254976 | Aravena | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130266122 | Patil | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130320246 | Beck | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140021377 | Khandkar | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140029720 | Osherov et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140103230 | Kang | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140312083 | Scott | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150041686 | Pizarro | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150195392 | Nissenbaum | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20170309357 | Gordon et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2091608 | Sep 1994 | CA |
2714859 | Oct 1978 | DE |
3326880 | Feb 1985 | DE |
202008002237 | Jul 2009 | DE |
1526603 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1541897 | Jun 2005 | EP |
2439460 | May 1980 | FR |
2472246 | Feb 2011 | GB |
S39-009443 | Apr 1964 | JP |
S49-022960 | Jun 1974 | JP |
S51-019380 | Feb 1976 | JP |
S52-112075 | Sep 1977 | JP |
HO230096 | Feb 1990 | JP |
H02-501769 | Jun 1990 | JP |
H03-502182 | May 1991 | JP |
H05-038685 | Feb 1993 | JP |
2003-533245 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004-264207 | Sep 2004 | JP |
WO 2004011824 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2007-212304 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2010-521992 | Jul 2010 | JP |
2010-525910 | Jul 2010 | JP |
2012135619 | Jul 2012 | JP |
2013-015369 | Jan 2013 | JP |
2013-512745 | Apr 2013 | JP |
2016533246 | Oct 2016 | JP |
10-2009030459 | Mar 2009 | KR |
WO 1989000831 | Feb 1989 | WO |
WO 198905216 | Jun 1989 | WO |
WO 2005094272 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2006088104 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2008140486 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2012049469 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2015042419 | Mar 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Gershov, I.Y. Properties and uses of barium ferrite ceramic magnets. Powder Metall Met Ceram 2, 227-234 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00774277 (Year: 1963). |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_field, retrieved Apr. 21, 2020 (Year: 2020). |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_particle, retrieved Apr. 21, 2020 (Year: 2020). |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polycarbonate, retrieved Apr. 21, 2020 (Year: 2020). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 14/845,264.2, dated Sep. 1, 2016, 11 pages. |
Health Physics Society, “Lead Garments (Aprons, Gloves, etc.),” hps.org [online], Aug. 13, 2014 [retrieved on Jan. 12, 2015]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://hps.org/publicinformation/ate/faqs/leadgarmentsfaq.html>, 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Application No. PCT/US2014/056585, dated Mar. 22, 2016, 5 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2014/056585, dated Dec. 26, 2014, 8 pages. |
Japanese Office Action in Application No. JP2016-544024, dated Jun. 18, 2018, 9 pages (with Machine translation). |
Mettler et al., “Radiologic and Nuclear Medicine Studies in the United States and Worldwide: Frequency, Radiation Dose, and Comparison with Other Radiation Sources—1950-2007,” Radiology, Nov. 2009, 253(2): 520-531. |
Naidu et al., “Radiation exposure to personnel performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography,” Postgrad Med J., 81(960):660-662, Oct. 2005. |
Whitby and Martin, “Investigation using an advanced extremity gamma instrumentation system of options for shielding the hand during the preparation and injection of radiopharmaceuticals,” J Radiol Prot., 23(1):79-96, Mar. 2003. |
EP Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC in Appln. No. 14845264.2 dated Dec. 4, 2018, 5 pages. |
EPO Summons in Application No. 14845264.2, dated Sep. 22, 2020, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180289343 A1 | Oct 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61880216 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15022104 | US | |
Child | 16006036 | US |