1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a lock for a motor vehicle.
2. Description of the Related State of the Art
A lock for a motor vehicle comprises a locking mechanism with a rotatably mounted rotary catch for receiving a locking bolt also referred to as a striker. The locking mechanism moreover comprises a pawl with which the rotary catch can be engaged for retaining the locking bolt.
The rotary catch of a motor vehicle lock usually comprises a fork-shaped inlet slot (also referred to as inlet opening) which is formed by the load arm and the rotary catching arm and which the locking bolt (also known as a striker) of a vehicle door or hatch, e.g. a hood or a trunk lid, enters when the door or hatch is closed. The locking bolt or striker then turns the rotary catch from an opened position in the direction of the closed position until the pawl engages the rotary catch. This position is referred to as the catching position. The locking bolt then cannot leave the inlet slot of the rotary catch.
Furthermore, a lock can comprise a blocking lever capable of blocking the pawl in its catching position. The blocking lever has to be pivoted or turned out of its blocking position in order for the pawl to be able to leave its catching position for opening the locking mechanism.
There are locks as known from US 2010 052 336 A1 in which the rotary catch is capable of introducing an opening moment into the pawl if the latter is in its catching position. Such a lock requires a blocking lever in order to be able to engage the locking mechanism. Such locks can be opened with little effort.
There are motor vehicle locks with two catching positions, i.e. a preliminary catching position and a main catching position. The preliminary catching position serves for rotary catching the respective door or hatch when the latter does not reach the main catching position during the closing process. If, starting from the preliminary catching position, the rotary catch is turned further correspondingly, it will finally reach the main catching position.
As a matter of principle, a lock comprises a releasing lever which is actuated in order to open or disengage a locking mechanism. Such a releasing lever is typically connected to a handle of a door or hatch. If the handle is actuated, the releasing lever is actuated, or pivoted, in order to disengage the locking mechanism and thus open the lock.
In the event of a crash, the handle may be actuated inadvertently, which would lead to the locking mechanism being opened. It should be ensured that such a lock does not open inadvertently in such a case.
In order to ensure that a lock does not open inadvertently in the event of a crash, a lock with a locking mechanism is provided according to document EP 1518983A2, which comprises at least one actuating lever for releasing or opening the locking mechanism, i.e. a releasing lever. The lock moreover comprises a blocking lever which blocks the actuating lever during predetermined vehicle accelerations.
In the event of a crash, particularly large accelerations occur, compared with a usual opening process. If the actuating lever blocks only at large vehicle accelerations, such as occur in the event of a crash, an unintentional opening of the locking mechanism in the case of a crash can be prevented. In the case of a usual actuation of the door handle, the actuating lever is not blocked for lack of a great acceleration in order to then enable the lock to be opened.
In view of the above-described problems, the invention provides in one aspect a lock in which an inadvertent opening is prevented in the event of a crash.
In order to accomplish the object, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a lock with a locking mechanism is provided which comprises a rotary catch and a pawl for engaging the rotary catch. Furthermore, the lock may comprise a blocking lever capable of blocking the pawl if the latter is located in its catching position. Moreover, a releasing lever for opening or releasing the locking mechanism is provided. If the releasing lever is actuated, the pawl or the blocking lever is thereby moved out of its blocking position if the releasing lever is not excessively accelerated. If excessively large accelerations of the releasing lever occur, as can be caused by a crash, then an arresting device of the lock prevents the releasing lever from being able to move the pawl or the blocking lever out of its blocking or latching position, respectively. The lock is therefore incapable of opening if the releasing lever is accelerated in the event of a crash.
In one embodiment, the arresting device comprises an inertia lever and a blocking lever. The inertia lever and the blocking lever are interconnected in such a way that the inertia lever is moved together with the blocking lever by the releasing lever only when the releasing lever is accelerated in the usual manner, as is the case when the door handle is actuated in the usual way for example by a driver of the vehicle. In such a case, the joint movement of the inertia lever and the blocking lever takes place in such a way that the blocking lever is incapable of preventing the locking mechanism from being opened. If the releasing lever is greatly accelerated, as this is possible in the event of a crash, then, due to the inertia of the inertia lever, only the blocking lever is moved, namely into a position which blocks further pivoting of the releasing lever in such a way that the locking mechanism is prevented from being opened.
In one embodiment of the invention, the arresting device comprises a spring which interconnects the inertia lever and the blocking lever in such a way that the inertia lever is moved together with the blocking lever by the releasing lever only when the releasing lever is accelerated in the usual manner. In a technically simple manner, this prevents a lock from being able to open unintentionally in the event of a crash. Acceleration in a usual manner means that there is no excessively large accelerations of the releasing lever (as a rule due to a crash).
In one embodiment of the invention, one leg of the spring is connected to the inertia lever. Such a connection is provided in particular if the leg of the spring rests against a contour of the inertia lever, preferably in a biased state. The contour may be provided by a projection or gap of the inertia lever. Another leg of the spring is connected to the blocking lever. Such a connection is provided in particular when the leg of the spring rests, preferably biased, against a contour of the blocking lever. A projection or a gap of the blocking lever may provide the contour. In the case of lower accelerations, the spring acts like a rigid connection between the blocking lever and the inertia lever. At lower accelerations, the blocking lever and the inertia lever are therefore moved together by an actuation of the releasing lever for opening the locking mechanism. Actuation of the releasing lever takes place by actuating a handle or grip of the corresponding door or flap.
In the case of a large acceleration, the spring, due to the inertia of the inertia lever, is deformed in such a way that only or at least mainly the blocking lever is moved, but not or at least nearly not the inertia lever. In particular, the spring is biased further in the case of a correspondingly large acceleration. If the blocking lever is moved independently of the inertia lever, the blocking lever then enters its arresting position. In the arresting position, the releasing lever is prevented from being able to be twisted further in such a way that the locking mechanism is opened thereby.
In one embodiment, the blocking lever comprises a lug which can be moved by the releasing lever for moving the blocking lever. If the releasing lever is actuated, the lug, and thus the blocking lever, are moved.
In one preferred embodiment of the invention, the lug of the blocking lever provides the above mentioned contour for the spring or a leg of the spring.
Preferably, the mass of the inertia lever is at least two, three, four or more times larger times larger than the mass of the blocking lever so as to reliably cause the inertia lever to be moved only at low accelerations of the releasing lever.
In one embodiment of the invention, a rotatably mounted safety lever rests against a contour of the inertia lever in a biased manner so as to reliably cause the inertia lever to be moved only at low accelerations of the releasing lever.
In one embodiment of the invention, the lock comprises an arresting profile rigidly or rotatably connected to a lock casing of the lock. The arresting profile serves for arresting the blocking lever if the releasing lever is excessively accelerated. If the blocking lever is arrested by the arresting profile and is thus located in its arresting position, the releasing lever cannot be twisted further in such a way that the locking mechanism is opened thereby.
In one embodiment of the invention, the rotatably mounted safety lever comprises the arresting profile in order to reduce the number of parts.
In one embodiment, the lock may comprise a blocking lever which may block the pawl in its arresting position. In this embodiment, a release lever may catch a lug of the blocking lever in order to remove the blocking lever from its blocking position.
In one embodiment, a release lever may act as a second pawl in order to engage the rotary catch.
The invention is described hereinafter with reference to accompanying drawings, in which:
As shown in
Rotary catch 1 may rotate around its axis 8. Pawl 2 may rotate around its axis 9. Inertia lever 4 may rotate around its axis 10. The weight of the inertia lever 4 is much higher than the weight of the blocking lever 3, at least two, three, four or more times.
As shown in
The blocking lever 3 is rotatably mounted on the inertia lever 4 adjacent to a lever arm of the releasing lever 7. Further, blocking lever 3 and inertia lever 4 are interconnected by a biased spring 12. A first leg 13 of the spring 12 rests against a projection 14 of the inertia lever 4 in a biased manner. The second leg 15 of the spring 12 rests against a projection 16 of the blocking lever in a biased manner as shown in greater detail in the
Projection 16 acts in addition as a lug. The above mentioned lever arm of the releasing lever 7 can catch the lug 16 in order to move the blocking lever 3 to the left. The blocking lever 3 may rotate around its axis 17 or together with the inertia lever 4 around the axis 10.
Activation by a driver or a further person of a corresponding grip of a vehicle connected to the locking mechanism, such as by a Bowden cable or other known means, results in rotating the releasing lever 2 in a clockwise manner. In such a case, the corresponding arm of the releasing lever moves the blocking lever 3 to the left. When the acceleration is low, the spring 12 acts as a rigid connection between the inertia lever 4 and the blocking lever 3. For this reason, movement of the blocking lever 3 to the left results in rotating the inertia lever 4 together with the blocking lever 3 in a counterclockwise manner around the axis 10. The releasing lever 7 catches a lug respectively a projection 18 of the pawl 2 in order to remove the pawl from its catching position. At the end, it is possible to open the corresponding door or flap.
During motor vehicle collisions, parts of the door handle or other vehicle components may accelerate and cause unwanted actuation of the grip resulting in a strong acceleration of the releasing lever 7. A strong acceleration of the releasing lever 7 results in a strong acceleration of the blocking pawl 3 to the left. In this case, the spring 12 does not act as a rigid connection between the blocking lever 3 and the inertia lever 4 due to the high weight and the resulting inertia of the inertia lever 4 and/or due to a friction force between the inertia lever 4 and the safety lever 5 since the safety lever 5 rests in a biased manner at a contour of the inertia lever 4. As a result, the inertia lever 4 does not rotate around its axis 10. Instead of that, the blocking lever 3 rotates in a clockwise manner in the direction of the position as shown in
When the blocking lever arrived at the position as shown in
The movement of the inertia lever 4 back to its starting position as shown in
The rotatably mounted safety leaver is rotatable around its axis 19. Due to a spring 20, the safety lever rests against a contour of the inertia lever in a biased manner.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4518180 | Kleefeldt | May 1985 | A |
4995654 | Nishigami | Feb 1991 | A |
5188406 | Sterzenbach | Feb 1993 | A |
5564761 | Mizuki | Oct 1996 | A |
5622396 | Neumann | Apr 1997 | A |
5634677 | Buscher et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5653484 | Brackmann | Aug 1997 | A |
5865481 | Buschmann | Feb 1999 | A |
5921595 | Brackmann | Jul 1999 | A |
5931034 | Fisher | Aug 1999 | A |
5961163 | Brackmann | Oct 1999 | A |
5979951 | Shimura | Nov 1999 | A |
6059327 | Yoshikuwa | May 2000 | A |
6076868 | Roger, Jr. | Jun 2000 | A |
6109079 | Ikeda | Aug 2000 | A |
6126212 | Fujihara | Oct 2000 | A |
6135514 | Kowalewski | Oct 2000 | A |
6142540 | Girard | Nov 2000 | A |
6148651 | Roncin | Nov 2000 | A |
6279361 | Baukholt | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6338508 | Kleefeldt | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343817 | Watanabe | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6364379 | Roberts | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6367296 | Dupont | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371536 | Koerwer | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371538 | Inoue | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382687 | Gruhn | May 2002 | B1 |
6406073 | Watanabe | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6435573 | Szablewski | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6540272 | Spurr | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6679531 | Rogers, Jr. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6791688 | Lai et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6824177 | Nass et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6932393 | Erices | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6991272 | Kalsi | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7475922 | Ottino | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7568740 | Brose | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7607702 | Pereverzev | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7926858 | Otsuka | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8056944 | Jankowski | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8303004 | Lee | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8353542 | Cumbo | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8840154 | Wilms | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9151090 | Beck | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9410345 | Uehara | Aug 2016 | B2 |
20010005080 | Inoue | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010010427 | Roos | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010024040 | Spurr | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020167178 | Spurr | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030234544 | Jankowski | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050134054 | Stefanic | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050140146 | Spurr | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060208504 | Kachouh | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060226661 | Moore | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060261602 | Jankowski | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080217928 | Spurr | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080224482 | Cumbo | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090322105 | Lee et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100013246 | Tomaszewski | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100052336 | Bendel et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110187132 | Scholz | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110210565 | Scholz et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120068479 | Bendel | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120110920 | Takagi | May 2012 | A1 |
20140001774 | Bendel et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140035295 | Bendel et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140049056 | Scholz | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140132008 | Bendel | May 2014 | A1 |
20140175813 | Margheritti | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140203575 | Brickner et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102011010797 | Aug 2012 | DE |
102011010815 | Aug 2012 | DE |
102011010816 | Aug 2012 | DE |
102013203808 | Sep 2014 | DE |
1 518 983 | Mar 2005 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140203575 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |