The invention relates to a lock-key system including a flat key which is insertable in the keyway of a cylinder core, wherein grooves and ribs inside the keyway are assigned to ribs and grooves on both flat sides of the key, wherein the key is subdivided into different profile sections from the key spine to the key facing, with the section near the key spine configured as guide section and with the section near the key facing at least partially receiving the notches for the associated tumblers.
Designs for such flat keys or keyways are known in a wide variety. Examples include hereby EP 0 261 298 A2 or DE 43 04 604 C2.
Conventional lock cylinders with flat key and pin tumblers are “attacked”i.a. by “picking” with manual picking tools, picking guns or so-called electropick.
During picking procedure, the pin tumblers are brought into opening position by the suitable tool. By bracing the cylinder core in rotation direction, the tumblers are braced successively in opening position and held until all tumblers are open. This is implemented during manual picking quasi statically or dynamically when picking with the mechanical picking gun or the electropick are involved.
Various measures have been proposed to guard against unauthorized opening of lock cylinders with picking tools and—mostly in combination—used together. These measures involve. . .
Although all described measures generally make picking more difficult, they are unable to prevent picking in principle.
It is therefore the object of the invention to provide a lock-key system which, as far as possible, cannot be opened by picking.
In accordance with the invention, this object is attained in a key lock system by assigning in the middle profile section at least one groove on the one outer surface of the keyway to a rib on the opposite outer surface of the keyway, by providing the groove as well as the rib, on one hand, with a flank, extending perpendicular or substantially perpendicular to the center plane of the: key or keyway and, on the other hand, with a flank, extending slantingly to this center lane, and by positioning the perpendicular or substantially perpendicular flank of the groove in confronting relationship to the slanted flank of the rib and by positioning the perpendicular or substantially perpendicular flank of the rib in confronting relationship to the slanted flank of the groove. Before paragraph [0016], add the heading
Preferred configurations are set forth in the sub-claims.
The keyway is subdivided in various sections which are arranged in offset relationship with respect to the centerline and paracentric.
This subdivision is known and is normally exploited for subdividing key profiles in order to separate the region for variation in lock assemblies: from a non-variable region.
Profiled channels configured in this way allow in some cases an opening of a cylinder by using a special picking tool at unfavorable tumbling combinations and with great skill. The configuration of keyways according to the invention is now characterized by a particular assignment of the flanks of the ribs and grooves in the middle profile section.
Exemplified embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the drawings in which
In the drawings (FIGS. 1-4), the flat key is designated with 1 and the respective keyway is designated with 2. The surrounding cylinder core is indicated with 3. The section near the key spine 6 is configured as guide section 8, whereas the section in proximity of the key facing 7 has the notches—not shown here—for the interaction with the tumblers.
In the illustrated exemplified embodiment, the middle profile section 9 is provided in the keyway with grooves 4 and ribs 5 which, of course, are associated to respective ribs 5a and grooves 4a on the side surfaces of the flat key. The profile section is demarcated in one direction by vertical flanks 4′ at the grooves 4 and 5′ at the ribs 5, and in the other direction by slanted flanks 4″ and 5″.
In the configuration illustrated in
As a sequence, the tool can move during picking in one preferred direction and can possibly be deflected into the next profile section, while the motion is stopped, however, in the other direction (barb effect).
A further embodiment—as illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4—includes a further taper of the profile sections in such a way that, when respectively dimensioned, the p. tool is wedged in one direction. As a result, the picking tool has less (or no) freedom of movement and picking is halted.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
100 42 070 | Aug 2000 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCTDE01/02999 | 8/7/2001 | WO | 00 | 1/27/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO0212659 | 2/14/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4368629 | Prunbauer | Jan 1983 | A |
4653298 | Tietz | Mar 1987 | A |
4787225 | Hauser et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4964288 | Braun et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5715717 | Widen | Feb 1998 | A |
5797287 | Prunbauer | Aug 1998 | A |
5809816 | Widen | Sep 1998 | A |
5845525 | Widen | Dec 1998 | A |
5964112 | Stefanescu | Oct 1999 | A |
6023954 | Field | Feb 2000 | A |
6615628 | Lou | Sep 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
43 04 604 | Aug 1994 | DE |
0 261 298 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0 928 867 | Jul 1999 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030164012 A1 | Sep 2003 | US |