The present invention relates to door latches for ranges, ovens and like appliances, and more particularly, to a latch assembly for use in self-cleaning ovens.
Modern ovens are often equipped with the capability to self clean. Self-cleaning is accomplished by heating the oven to temperatures of approximately 400°–480° C. (750°–900° F.) Typically, an oven can be placed in a self cleaning mode only when the oven door is it its latched state and often a lock is provided to lock the oven in its latched state while self cleaning. Generally, most non-self cleaning or normal baking occurs at temperatures at or below 500° F. while the oven door is in either a latched or an unlatched state. Therefore the prior art has included an oven door locking mechanism, effective when the oven door is latched, which locks the oven door at a temperature around approximately 500° F.
Prior art oven door locking mechanisms take various forms. Some are manual locking devices while others are automatic or motor driven locking devices. Manual devices have been developed to include thermostatically controlled locking mechanisms to prevent the inadvertent opening of the oven door at elevated temperatures during operation. In some self cleaning ovens, the locking device uses a bimetallic coil to thermally respond to changing temperatures to effect the locked and unlocked states. Such devices are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,438,666; 4,133,337 and 4,838,586. However, these mechanisms are problematic as they may lock at a temperature consistent with normal baking, or unlock, allowing the oven door to be opened, while the oven cavity is dangerously hot. Such devices, if unlocked while cleaning, may pose a safety risk to persons opening the oven door. Furthermore, in a normal baking mode, if such an oven door becomes locked, it prevents the inspection of or addition to the baking foods thus leading to the possibility of overcooked or even burnt foods.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,456,243 teaches a manual oven locking device which locks and unlocks the oven door by counterbalancing springs. However, the control of temperature is limited as the spring must be changed to alter the temperature at which the oven locks or unlocks.
Hence, a problem exists in that during an extended baking cycle or a self cleaning mode, the latched oven door may become locked at ‘too low’ a temperature presenting a potential baking catastrophe or may be opened at ‘too high’ a temperature presenting a potential safety hazard.
The present invention is intended to eliminate the problem of the prior art by providing a locking mechanism capable of locking and unlocking at substantially different temperatures. Specifically, the present invention allows the latched oven door to lock at a temperature substantially higher than that at which it unlocks.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improved oven door lock having a method to control the locking and unlocking temperatures of the oven door during operation.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an oven door lock whose locking temperature is substantially higher than its unlocking temperature.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide an oven door lock which prevents the oven door from locking in a latched state during non self-cleaning operation.
Yet another objective of the present invention is to provide an improved oven door locking mechanism with a refined degree of cool down temperature control to unlock the oven door.
The invention, for use in a self-cleaning oven, may be embodied in an improved oven door locking mechanism capable of locking a closed, latched oven door at a temperature substantially higher than that at which it unlocks. The door locking mechanism generally includes a clutch mechanism, a latch mechanism defining a lock hole therein and a first spring contacting a lock member. The clutch mechanism comprises a thermally responsive element, a clutch, and the lock member. The thermally responsive element is in engagement via the clutch with the lock member to cause the desired ascent and descent of the lock member i.e., locking and unlocking the latched oven door during self-cleaning.
In the illustrated embodiment, the thermally responsive element generally has a first end and a second end. The first end is secured to the door locking mechanism and the second end defines a second side of the clutch, in the form of a slot which is in engagement with a first end of the lock member. In the described embodiment, the slot is elongated in shape, and the thermally responsive element is a bimetallic leaf whose slot is slidably and inseparably engaged with the lock member.
In this illustrated embodiment, the lock member, which may be a cylindrical lock rod, comprises a first end and a second end. The first end defines a first side of the clutch, in the form of a keyed aperture. The keyed aperture is in engagement with the slot, in the thermally responsive element, defining the second side of the clutch. The keyed aperture comprises an annular recess, along the axial surface, as a groove whose length is determined by the desired difference between the locking and unlocking temperatures of the oven door. The length of this groove is traversed by the expanding and contracting bimetallic leaf during heating and cooling of the oven, and thus this length determines the difference between the temperatures at which the oven door locks and unlocks. The second end of the lock member is adapted to be received by the lock hole defined in the latch mechanism.
In the described embodiment, the oven door may be locked or unlocked only in a latched state. Specifically, the latch mechanism comprises a lock hole to enable a latched-locked state for the oven door. When the closed oven door is latched, the lock hole moves into a position to receive the second end on the lock member. In an alternate embodiment, the lock hole is fitted with a receiver member adapted to receive a lock member therein. The receiver member may be, but is not limited to, a zinc plated steel bushing which withstands the high self-cleaning oven temperatures and is resistant to rust.
Additionally, the described door locking mechanism includes a first spring contacting the lock member. The first spring may be any material resistant to high oven temperatures, such as either stainless steel or an alloy composition known in the art as ‘Inconel’, and any shape, such as a hairpin. The first spring, affixed to a mounting bracket, encompasses the lock member, exerting force upon it to prevent the locked oven door from achieving an unlocked state during cool down until a predetermined cool down temperature has been reached.
When self-cleaning cycle is complete or when the oven is turned off after cooking or baking is finished, the oven cavity will cool down. During cool down, as the temperature decreases, the bimetallic leaf contracts and retracts. During retraction, the bimetallic leaf traverses the length of the annular recess. During traversal, the lock rod remains it its locked state or in the lock hole against the force of gravity due to the frictional force exerted upon it by the spring. After the bimetallic leaf traverses the recess, the bimetallic leaf begins to pull the lock rod in the direction of retraction. The retractive force overcomes the frictional force exerted by the first spring and causes the lock rod to release from the lock hole, thus unlocking the oven door. The length or distance of the traversed annular recess coupled with the retraction characteristics of the bimetal and the frictional force of the first spring will allow a reduced temperature, substantially lower than that at which the oven locks, at which the lock rod is released, to unlock the oven door.
In a preferred embodiment, the bimetallic leaf is chosen based upon the individual expansion and contraction characteristics of the metals to match the desired lock and unlock temperatures of the oven door. However, because of the difference between the lock and the unlock temperatures facilitated by the principles of the present invention, the bimetallic leaf may not need to be calibrated to the oven chamber, or calibrated as accurately as the thermally responsive elements of the prior art.
In a preferred embodiment, latch mechanism includes an improved nuisance latch which prevents the latch mechanism from being moved from the unlatched state to the latched state at an elevated temperature and, therefore, avoiding inadvertent locking of the latch mechanism in the latched state, during non-self-cleaning, elevated temperature operation of the oven. The nuisance latch includes a second thermally responsive element which deflects into engagement with the latch mechanism as the oven is used for cooking. Once the second thermally responsive element engages the latch mechanism, the lock hole is no longer accessible to the lock rod upon deflection by the expanding bimetallic leaf. Thus, the lock member is prevented from locking the latch mechanism in the latched state.
Other objects and advantages and a full understanding of the invention will be had from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments and the accompanying drawings.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with a general description of the invention given above, and the detailed description of the embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
Preferred embodiments of the invention are shown in the accompanying drawings in which:
The detailed description describes the common features of our pending U.S. Pat. No. 639,588, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein, as well as the present invention disclosed.
Referring to
The door lock 16 is fixed to the frame 24 in a position near the front and center of the cooking apparatus 10 and just above the cooking chamber wall 14 as illustrated in
As seen in
Referring to
The principles and an alternate embodiment of the present invention are shown in detail in
As seen in
As seen in
As seen in
A link arm 102 (
As seen in
As seen in
The switch 30 has a switch arm 134 which bears against a cam surface 136 of the handle mount 104. When the latch mechanism 18 is in the unlatched state, the cam surface 136 bears against the switch arm 134 which depresses a button 138, signaling that the door 22 is unlatched. When the latch mechanism 18 is in the latched state, the cam surface 136 allows the switch arm 134 to bias outwardly away from the button 138 which signals to a user and/or oven control that the door 22 is latched. The switch 30 includes electrical leads 140a, 140b which send a signal indicating when the latch mechanism 18 has successfully been positioned in the latched state. Sandwiched between the switch 30 and the mounting bracket 26 is an insulation pad 142 which provides thermal and electrical insulation between the switch 30 and the mounting bracket 26. The switch 30 and insulation pad 142 are affixed to the mounting bracket 26 with rivets 144 or any other suitable means.
In the illustrated embodiment shown in
In an alternate embodiment, as seen in
The self-cleaning operation cannot be started without a connection through switch 30 verifying that the door 22 is closed and latched. If the oven door 22 is unlatched, either in an open or closed position, and an attempt is made to initiate the self-cleaning operation, the self cleaning operation will not initiate. When the oven door 22 is in an unlatched state in a closed position, the second spring 122 of the latch mechanism 18 will maintain the latch arm 20 in its unlatched state. Also, if the door 22 is closed and the cooking apparatus 10 is in use for cooking, the latch mechanism 18 will be prevented from being latched to prevent initiation of the self-cleaning operation and, thus, prevent food being cooked from being locked within the cooking apparatus 10 and, therefore, burning.
When the cooking apparatus 10 is placed in self-cleaning mode or heated to elevated temperatures during normal cooking, the clutch 77 of the clutch mechanism 79 engages to control locking and unlocking temperatures. At the elevated temperature, the bimetallic leaf 66 expands or deflects into engagement with the lock member, preferably a lock rod 72, causing the lock rod 72 to ascend towards the lock hole 110 on the latch mechanism 18. When the lock rod 72 ascends into the lock hole 110, the door 22 is locked closed preventing the latch mechanism 18 from moving to an unlatched state from a latched state. In effect, the oven has achieved a latched-locked state.
When cooking or self-cleaning cycle is complete and the heating source is removed, the oven cavity 17 will cool down and the oven door 22 will unlock. During cool down, as the temperature decreases, the bimetallic leaf 66 contracts and retracts. During retraction, the bimetallic leaf 66 traverses the entire length of the annular recess 75. During traversal, the lock rod 72 remains it its locked state or in the lock hole 110 due to the frictional force exerted upon it by the first spring 45. After traversal, the continual contractile motion of the bimetallic leaf 66 begins to pull the lock rod 72 in the direction of retraction. The retractive force overcomes the counteracting frictional force exerted by the first spring 45 and causes the lock rod 72 to descend and release from the lock hole 110, thus unlocking the oven door 22. The temperature at which the lock rod 72 is released, can be controlled by the length or distance of the annular recess 75 that the bimetallic leaf 66 must traverse before it affirmatively removes the lock rod 72 out of the locking mechanism 78, i.e., out of the lock hole 110. This recess 75 can be calculated to allow unlocking to occur at any desired cooling temperature, based on the expansion and contraction characteristics of the bimetallic leaf 66. It is well known in the art that metals have differing rates of hysteresis and that bi-metals, in particular, have hysteresis between expansion or curling during heating and retraction or uncurling during cooling. The length or distance of the traversed annular recess 75 coupled with the retraction characteristics of the bimetal 66 and the retaining force of the first spring 45 will allow a reduced temperature, substantially lower than that at which the oven locks, at which the lock rod 72 is released from the lock hole 110, to effect the unlocking of the oven door.
While the present invention has been illustrated by a description of various embodiments and while these embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the applicants to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. For example, the thermally responsive elements need not be bimetal leaves, but could alternatively be shaped memory effect metals, or others. The invention in its broader aspects is therefore not limited to the specific details, representative apparatus and method, and illustrative example shown and described. Accordingly, it is apparent that certain modifications or alterations can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention set forth in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3438666 | Erickson | Apr 1969 | A |
3540767 | Siegel | Nov 1970 | A |
3894214 | Staples | Jul 1975 | A |
4039993 | Kerr | Aug 1977 | A |
4133337 | Shea | Jan 1979 | A |
4718705 | Case | Jan 1988 | A |
4838586 | Henne | Jun 1989 | A |
4862870 | Fox | Sep 1989 | A |
5004276 | Hanley | Apr 1991 | A |
5012794 | Faurel | May 1991 | A |
5029910 | Genbauffe et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5062668 | Onderka et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5072974 | Henne | Dec 1991 | A |
5121950 | Davidian | Jun 1992 | A |
5220153 | Malone et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5419305 | Hanley | May 1995 | A |
5440103 | Martin | Aug 1995 | A |
5456243 | Jones | Oct 1995 | A |
5477030 | Buckshaw et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5493099 | McWilliams, III | Feb 1996 | A |
5676408 | Davidian | Oct 1997 | A |
5746005 | Steinberg | May 1998 | A |
5746456 | Violi et al. | May 1998 | A |
6474702 | Malone et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |