The present invention relates generally to door latches, and more specifically to a lock unit for the door of a vehicle utilizing a pawl having a slot mounted on a fixed pawl pivot axis.
Lock units customarily used for side-doors of motor vehicles utilize a latching mechanism, known as a catch, which receives a catch-bolt, or striker, disposed on a pillar of the vehicle doorframe. The catch is biased to an open position wherein a slot of the latch housing is aligned with a recess of the catch. As the door is shut, the striker enters the recess through the slot and rotates the catch to a closed position in which the striker is retained in the recess by a pawl which prevents the catch from rotating toward the open position. Typically the pawl is heavily biased towards the catch with the interface of the two comprised of a further negative biased angle to resist high acceleration forces. The latch housing is typically made of plastic and may be closed sealingly all-around by a cover outside the region of the slot. Such lock units typically include at least one release lever (e.g., an inside or outside door handle) and a displaceable locking mechanism (e.g., a lock cylinder at or in the outside door handle or a slide button disposed inside the window pane area of the door). In such a case, with the locking mechanism unlocked, the motion of the inside or outside door handle is interconnected through the mechanism and the motion separates the connection of the pawl and the catch by overcoming the pawl bias forces, thereby allowing the spring-loaded catch to move to the open position.
As required by law, lock units for doors, hatches and tailgates of motor vehicles must be provided with a secondary latched position in addition to the primary latched position. This secondary latched position falls between the primary latched position and the open position such that if the catch fails to reach the primary latched position, the door will be retained shut in the secondary latched position rather than moving all the way to the open position, which would obviously be dangerous to an occupant of a moving vehicle. In addition to preventing the vehicle door from opening during travel, the secondary latched position is also perceptible when a user does not close the vehicle door with sufficient force. By law, the secondary latched position leaves the door visibly ajar when the vehicle door is closed with too little force to be noticed that it is not securely latched. By applying additional force (e.g., leaning against the vehicle door), the latching mechanism can be forced into the primary latched position and the door completely shut.
When released from the primary latched position by actuating the release lever, the pawl abruptly breaks away from the corresponding locking surface of the catch and the spring-loaded catch moves at a high velocity to the open position. The abrupt movement of the locking surfaces against one another results in a significant opening clack followed immediately by a second significant clack caused by the catch making impact with a limit stop as it reaches the open position. Owing to the high forces biasing the locking surfaces of the pawl and catch against one another (and also biasing the catch toward the limit stop), the noises caused by opening the vehicle door are quite loud. Additionally, the high impacts on the pawl and catch can cause damage to the lock unit and severely limit its useful life, especially since most of the impact occurs along the locking surfaces.
German Patent Application No. DE 10 2007 003 948 A1 describes a multi-pawl latching mechanism which reduces both the latching noises during opening and the forces required to actuate the latching mechanism. The locking surfaces of the catch and a first pawl are correspondingly chamfered and canted to achieve a smooth and gradual sliding when the locking surfaces are released from one another. Because the locking surfaces were designed to reduce the resultant shear forces caused by the locking surfaces pressing against one another while the catch is released, the forces required to actuate the locking mechanism are also correspondingly reduced. Further, due to the reduction in forces acting on the latching mechanism, the noise produced during opening is significantly reduced.
However, because the locking surfaces are designed to slide relatively easily with respect to one another, the latching mechanism is not self-latching (i.e., the locking surfaces do not hold the catch in place on their own) and requires a pawl blocking lever to hold the first pawl against the catch in the primary latched position. Additionally, to achieve a secondary latched position, a second pawl is also required. To prevent the pawl blocking lever from engaging in the secondary latched position during closing, the second pawl is disposed in a separate plane from the catch, the first pawl and the blocking lever. The secondary latched position is achieved if the primary latched position fails to engage (e.g., first pawl slides off the catch) by a bolt extending from the catch to the plane of the second pawl which abuts a blocking arm of the second pawl in the opening path of the catch. Providing the second pawl on a different plane and the introduction of the bolt into the catch can be costly from a manufacturing standpoint, however. Thus, while the multi-pawl design effectively reduces opening noise and latch actuation forces, it requires multiple different components at multiple planes of the latching mechanism, thereby making the device relatively complex and expensive to manufacture.
In order to reduce size and manufacturing costs, the primary and secondary latched positions of a lock unit should reside on the same plane as the catch. Further, providing a single blocking arm of a single pawl to achieve the primary and secondary latched positions helps to further simplify the design and ensure consistent operation. However, the lock unit should still utilize a smooth release of locking surfaces to minimize noise and actuation forces. In addition, the design should take into account manufacturing tolerances such that minor dimensional variations will not adversely effect the performance of the lock unit.
In an embodiment, the present invention provides a lock unit having a pawl disposed intermediate a catch and a blocking lever. The catch is rotatable and biased in an opening direction about a catch rotation axis toward an open position of the lock unit in which a first recess of the catch is configured to receive a striker of the vehicle. Additionally, the catch includes a second recess disposed before the first recess in the opening direction. The pawl includes a slot rotatable about a fixed pawl pivot axis and is biased toward both the catch and the pawl pivot axis. Further, the pawl includes a blocking arm which extends into the second recess of the catch when the lock unit is in a secondary latched position. The blocking lever abuts the blocking arm of the pawl against the catch in a primary latched position of the lock unit. When the lock unit is forced from the secondary latched position to the primary latched position, opposite the opening direction of the catch, the pawl moves in a longitudinal direction of the slot and avoids displacement of the blocking lever.
The foregoing and other features of the present invention will be more readily apparent from the following detailed description and drawings of illustrative embodiments of the invention in which:
Referring to
In one embodiment, the catch 20, pawl 40 and ratchet 60 can be relatively flat parts made from metal or plastic. A pawl spring 50 may be connected to the pawl 40 in by securing one end of the spring behind peg 42, which can be added to the pawl 40 by a subsequent operation, but may be integrally formed by a molding process. However, in other embodiments, the pawl spring 50 may be connected to the pawl 40 in other ways, e.g., by rotatably positioning one end of a torsion spring into a hole in the pawl 40. In another, less efficient embodiment the pawl may be biased by individual springs towards the catch 20 and longitudinally towards the pawl axis 46. The baseplate 10, and any housing covering the lock unit 10, can also be formed by plastic injection molding. In another embodiment, the lock unit 10 is constructed from metal or a combination of metal and plastic components.
In
Regardless of the relative placement of the blocking lever 62 and stop 54, the ratchet 60 may be prevented from rotating by the normal force from the stop 54 running through the ratchet rotation axis 68. However, it is preferable to limit the rotation of the ratchet 60 about the ratchet rotation axis 68 using a ratchet spring 70, which may be a torsion spring having one end connected to the baseplate 12 and the other end connected to the ratchet 60 at a spring support 66. Thus, even if the force from the stop 54 causes a moment to be applied to the ratchet 60 (i.e., normal force does not run through the ratchet rotation axis 68), the ratchet spring 70 will hinder rotation and maintain contact between the blocking lever 62 and the stop 54, thereby maintaining the position of the pawl 40 and preventing the primary stop 32 from coming free from the blocking arm 48. Limit stops (e.g., protrusions extending from the baseplate 12) could also be used to limit the rotation of the ratchet 60, as well as the catch 20 and the pawl 40, to a predetermined range of motion. According to an embodiment, the rotation of the ratchet 60 is at its limits in the clockwise direction when in the primary latched position and is biased to that position by ratchet spring 70.
In order to open the vehicle door, the lock unit 10 is released from the primary latched position shown in
Referring to
Once the primary stop 32 clears the blocking arm 48 at the position shown in
Referring to
When a user closes the vehicle door, the striker 16 enters into the slot 14 and hits against a striking edge 38 of the first recess 22. The force of the door as it closes causes the striker 16 to press against the striking edge 38 of the first recess 22, thereby rotating the catch 20 against the spring force opposite the opening direction S1. During initial rotation, the blocking arm 48 of the pawl 40 slides along the sliding surface 36 of the catch 20. Similarly to the release of the catch 20 when opening the door, the second recess 30 and the primary stop 32 will slide past the blocking arm 48 such that the secondary latched position shown in
However, in a case where the vehicle door is not shut with sufficient force (i.e., closed too slowly), the lock unit 10 enters into the secondary latched position shown in
Referring to
Referring to
The pawl 40 is biased toward the pawl pivot axis 46 in the longitudinal direction L of the slot 44 by first force component S3 and biased toward the catch 20 by the second force component S4, together spring force S2. The force applied to the pawl 40 as the exit edge 31 slides against the blocking arm 48 counter-acts the first force component S3 to compress the pawl spring 50 and move the pawl 40 linearly along the longitudinal direction L of the slot 44 while the second force component S4 holds the pawl 40 against the catch 20. Once the pawl linear travel exceeds the stationary tip of the blocking lever 62, the pawl is free to rotate clockwise away from catch 20. At the point shown in
Referring to
As the primary stop 32 of catch 20 nears the primary latched position, the blocking arm 48 of pawl 40 slides smoothly up along primary stop 32. The linear reset of pawl 20 relative to the pawl pivot axis may or may not take place with a rotation of the ratchet 60. The positive slope between the blocking arm 48 and primary stop 32 are sufficient to allow pawl 40 to rotate into the catch 20 and clear blocking lever 62 with only slight over-travel rotation of catch 20. If the first force component S3 is sufficient to overcome ratchet spring 70 and the speed slow enough to overcome the stationary inertia of ratchet 60, the linear reset of pawl 20 may take place through rotation of the ratchet 60 prior to the catch 20 reaching the primary latched position. After reaching the position of the lock unit 10 shown in
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3504511 | Allen | Apr 1970 | A |
4172768 | Cerdan | Oct 1979 | A |
4334704 | Yamada | Jun 1982 | A |
4917420 | Rogers, Jr. | Apr 1990 | A |
4936611 | Palvolgyi | Jun 1990 | A |
5273325 | Zimmermann | Dec 1993 | A |
6105459 | Troiano | Aug 2000 | A |
6485071 | Schwaiger | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6547291 | Schwaiger | Apr 2003 | B1 |
20080012353 | Graute et al. | Jan 2008 | A9 |
20100052336 | Bendel et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110260475 | Spurr et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102007003948 | May 2008 | DE |
102008061524 | Jun 2010 | DE |
1620615 | Oct 2006 | EP |
WO 2008061491 | May 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110012376 A1 | Jan 2011 | US |