Intermodal security is a major concern for all businesses that need to ship material goods via truck, rail and sea.
According to a recent report released by Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), industry experts estimate all cargo theft adds up to $30 billion each year. Besides thieves who break into random cargo containers, there have been instances where the driver responsible for the cargo is directly involved in the robbery. The FBI has also identified this and has attributed an offense code to ‘driver involved cargo theft’ in its Uniform Crime Report (UCR).
Locking devices and technologies currently available in the market limit themselves to physically locking the containers. Most of these products are one-time use products or require a physical key or combination for operation. The biggest disadvantage in this case is the lack of accountability in the event of theft. These devices offer no assistance in determining when and where the intrusion might have occurred.
A single-use lock requires additional cutting tools. Also, if the container needs to be opened at the request of law enforcement officials, it requires that the bolt be cut and a new bolt be installed. All of the cut bolts are either wasted or are recycled, which involves additional handling and shipping expenses.
In case of locking devices with a physical key or combination, there is a no record of when the lock has been operated. This situation can be used to the advantage of drivers, who often control the combination or key, with criminal intent who can tamper with the goods on board. Other reusable locks available come with a recurring expense of bolt-seal for each use.
Another aspect of cargo security is financial accountability in the event of theft. Cargo containers delivering goods usually see multiple modes of transportation including sea, train and road. When cargo theft occurs on such a complex route involving multiple individuals and shipping companies and if no proof exists as to when the theft occurred, it becomes extremely difficult for the insurance companies to determine financial responsibility.
Besides cargo theft, containers have also been targeted to smuggle illegal goods and people. US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) uses expensive technologies like X-ray, to deter these illegal activities. A security mechanism, which provides an electronic manifest of goods on board, an electronic log detailing the date and time when the container was accessed, and tamper sensors to provide a high level of confidence that the container was not compromised in transit is needed as an inexpensive and time-saving screening option for low-risk cargo.
The intermodal industry needs an affordable security solution which includes locking, event logging, tamper monitoring and optional GPS tracking.
The present invention is a re-usable, electro-mechanical, event-logging lock for cargo containers or similar enclosed spaces such as storage units. The robust locking mechanism includes a dual ratcheting cam, which firmly secures doors of a container or other enclosure. The lock continuously monitors lock status and detects tampering. The lock logs all operation and tampering events with a date and time stamp. The device is rugged, simple to operate, resistant to tampering, and will endure shock, rough handling and extreme weather conditions.
To unlock the device, the user obtains a temporary access code and unlocks the device, either by a wireless interface or by a physically connected interface such as, for example, a key pad. The device incorporates a rolling access code algorithm that changes the access code based upon a pre-defined and customer selected time period during which the code is valid. Once the validity period expires the user must obtain a new access code from a secure access code source to unlock the device. When access is desired, the user contacts a remote secure access code source, which provides the access code for the associated lock and time period. No form communication, wireless or otherwise, from the device to the access code source is required.
A preferred embodiment provides a secure locking mechanism which can be used with shipping containers, including ISO styled cargo containers. Cargo container doors typically have vertical keeper bars, which are generally parallel bars, permanently attached to the doors of the container to secure the doors in the closed position during transit or storage. In a preferred embodiment, the device is constructed and arranged to be installed on the keeper bars. Once the embodiment is properly installed on keeper bars and locked, access to the container is prohibited. An alternate embodiment may be permanently installed on the interior of the container, such as the doors, or similar enclosure.
In one embodiment, a magnet 39 is installed on the edge of the solenoid piston as shown in
A precise Real Time Clock (RTC) module 50 and a non-volatile memory (memory) 52 are other components of the preferred CCA;
In preferred embodiments, the Real-Time Clock is the principal link between the rolling access code server and the lock. The rolling access code is generated as a function of Date, Time, DSN, E-Code Lookup Table. The Real-Time Clock also provides time-stamping for the Events in the Event Log. With the time stamp, the container can be traced to a specific location or condition at a specific time. For example, a tamper event at 0100 on the 25th of February verifies that the container was in the possession of a particular shipping company. If a theft loss is not discovered until days later after the container has passed through multiple transportation companies, the date of the theft can be verified and a claim filed against the transportation company then in possession.
The Non-Volatile Memory may store user settings, such as the Code Validity Period, the event log, such as lock, unlock, and tamper events, and a shipping manifest.
An H-bridge solenoid driver circuit may be used to operate the solenoid.
The embodiment as shown in
In one embodiment, the device incorporates a Rolling Access Code scheme that dynamically changes the access (pairing) code based on a pre-defined Code Validity Period (CVP). If a Bluetooth device is used, dynamic changes to the pairing code are provided. Each lock is given a unique Device Serial Number (DSN) and this serial number is saved to the memory present in the lock. The processor of the device may also have a set of code generation tables, each table containing random numbers (E-Code), also stored in memory; for example, 10 pages of 365 tabulated random 8-digit numbers. When CVP expires, the device of this embodiment changes its code, such as the Bluetooth access (pairing) code, thereby rendering the previous code ineffective. For example, if the CVP is defined as 1 hour, at the top of each hour the embodiment changes its Bluetooth access code. A user who obtains the access code within the hour will not be able to use the same code after the top of the next hour.
In a preferred embodiment, the Rolling Access Code (RAC) is determined by a RAC generation algorithm executed by the microcontroller. The effective RAC is computed as a function of the current date and time (T-Code), as provided by the RTC, the unique DSN, as retrieved from memory, and an E-Code selected from a particular code generation table based; for example, on the DSN and the current date. The RAC generation algorithm is suitably designed to negate the affects of numerical calculation errors such as rounding. The RAC generation algorithm may resemble the following function: F(T-Code*E-Code*DSN)=RAC. A preferred embodiment accepts only a 6-digit Bluetooth pairing code, thereby, providing elimination of accidental pairing with other BEDs employing the standard 4-digit Bluetooth pairing code.
In a preferred embodiment, no external communication, such as communication to and from a satellite or cell tower, is required. Each device has a unique DSN and a precise RTC. This allows the current RAC to be calculated by a copy of the algorithm and E-Code tables operated at a location remote from the device, such as a computer server that also has precise date and time information. The current RAC may be obtained from the remote location by telephone or internet communications, and provided to an authorized user who will unlock the lock.
Once authentication of the user is established, for example by a user name and password, the user provides the DSN of the device to be unlocked to the remote location (server). The remote server verifies that the authenticated user is authorized to operate the particular device. For example, the remote server verifies that the provided DSN is within a set of DSNs controlled by the authenticated user's organization. The remote server calculates the current access code and provides the access code to the authenticated authorized user. When using a cellular ‘smart’ phone, a custom software application (app) may be used to connect to the server site via a Quick Response (QR) code printed on the HMI 8. The smart phone may read the unique DSN via a bar code scanner, camera, Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tag or similar technology. The application sends this information, along with the user's authentication information, to the secure source via a cellular network or WIFI network. Upon validation, the application transmits the access code to the device.
In a preferred embodiment, the device is equipped with a tilt sensor 65. This sensor is preferred to be activated when the device is in the locked state. In this embodiment, when the device is locked on a container, it can be removed only after its unlocked using a wireless control such as a Bluetooth enabled device. If forced removal of the device from the container results in tilting of the device, any tilt above a predefined limit will be detected by the tilt sensor. For example, a tilt greater than 45 degrees to the original position of the device when locked will be detected by the tilt sensor. This detected tamper event is saved to the event log, with a time and date stamp, in the memory.
In a preferred embodiment, the device is equipped with a programmable shock sensor 66. This sensor is preferred to be activated when the device is in the locked state. When the device is subject to high-g shock, such as from a hammer blow, the shock sensor registers this tamper event. This detected tamper event is saved to the event log, with a time and date stamp, in memory.
In a preferred embodiment, the device employs a J-Bar Tamper Detection Circuit 67;
In another embodiment, the memory of the circuit card assembly may comprise data logging 76 to store an inventory log of all goods on board (manifest). This inventory log may be made available only to users with administrative rights (administrators). Administrators can connect to the wireless or Bluetooth module via a Serial Port Profile (SPP) connection. Once this SPP connection is established administrators can download or upload data to the embodiment.
The circuit card assembly may be powered by rechargeable batteries 68, such as Lithium Iron Phosphate batteries. These rechargeable batteries can be charged via the charging terminals 70 available on the embodiment. In the event of completely discharged batteries, the user can connect to an external battery 72 or battery charger 74 to the charging terminals to power the device and unlock the device as required.
In the case of a wireless embodiment, such as a Bluetooth Enabled Device, upon access code entry and validation, the device may unlock, and log the event. In another embodiment, the device has a keypad or touchpad 12 as part of the HMI, which may be used to enter the temporary access code. The keypad or touchpad may be provided in addition to the wireless unlocking feature, and entry via this device may also be logged by the device.
Using a wireless connection or a hard-wired connection such as USB, authorized users may download the electronic manifest, container routing information, or other information, into the devices' on-board non-volatile memory. Law enforcement, border patrol or other agencies may access the manifest and the event log using proprietary software running on suitably equipped Bluetooth enabled computing device, such as a smart phone or tablet computer. Law enforcement can thereby be assured of the containers contents, last access date and time, and that the container has not been compromised.
Another embodiment incorporates wireless communication and/or Global Positioning System (GPS) technology onto the microcontroller board. The wireless communication may be traditional cellular technology and/or Short Burst Data Satellite Modem. Using the GPS or cellular network, this embodiment periodically determines the position of the secured container. An internal tracking algorithm determines if the secured container is within the dimensional bounds of the pre-programmed tracking, such as by position and time. Should the experienced track of the device and container violate the bounds of the expected track, an event is logged and the upgraded embodiment broadcasts an alert using the installed wireless network. A track violation occurs when the device is not within the scheduled grid established by the scheduled date and time.
In one embodiment, a wireless transmitter transmits location information on a frequent basis. A wireless receiving station on the other end receives the location. Pre-defined routes are downloaded to the wireless receiving station. With available route information and incoming information from the device, the wireless station determines if there is a route mismatch. The wireless receiving station notifies relevant parties, such as by telephone, e-mail or text messaging services. The wireless receiving station may upload location details to a mapping service, such as a website having mapping. Users can log track the subject container on a map. Wireless transmission and wireless reception means include, but are not limited to, Global Positioning Systems or modems.
In an embodiment, upon detection of a tamper event, the device transmits its location and all pertinent information, such as special manifest information, via the wireless communications network.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/450,185 filed Mar. 8, 2011.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61450185 | Mar 2011 | US |