The present invention relates to a lock and, more particularly, to a lock providing improved security and resistance to attack.
The primary function of a lock is to deter individuals seeking unauthorized access to property. A lock typically comprises a core, sometimes referred to as a cylinder or a plug, which is selectively rotatable in the lock's body or casing to releasably secure a bolt or shank to the body of the lock. Typically, one or more locking pin(s), movable in the core, are arranged to selectively engage the body and prevent the core from turning in the body unless a correctly coded input moves the locking pin(s) to a position enabling rotation of the core. In a pin tumbler lock, for example, the locking pins comprise tumbler stacks which extend across the shear line separating the rotatable core from the body. When a correctly bitted key is inserted into the keyway, the tumbler stacks are moved to positions where the separation between the top and bottom tumblers of the stacks are all aligned with the shear line enabling rotation of the core and release of the bolt. Pin tumbler locks may be attacked by “picking,” mechanically manipulating the tumblers to their unlocked positions, permitting the lock to be operated without access to the correct key.
The correctly coded input for an electronic lock is typically a sequence of electrical signals transferred between the lock and a key. The sequence of signals is typically interpreted by a logic unit of the lock, or logic units of the lock and the key, and if the sequence matches a correct sequence, an actuator is energized to release the bolt or shank from the body.
While electronic locks are not subject to attack by manual tumbler picking, they are subject to attack by other methods that are also used to attack mechanical locks. Manually operated locks, including electronic locks, typically comprise a keyway into which a key is inserted. If the key includes the correct code, the core is released and the user can rotate the unlocked core by applying torque to the key. A lock may be attacked by inserting an object into the keyway and applying torque to the keyway in an attempt to overload and fail the locking mechanism. Another method of attacking a lock is to drill into the face of the core to destroy the components of the locking mechanism and free the core to rotate and release the bolt. What is desired, therefore, is a lock that is resistant to attack by drilling into the core or by applying excessive torque to the keyway.
A lock typically comprises a core that is selectively rotatable in the lock's body to release a bolt or shank that is securable to the body. Referring in detail to the drawings where similar parts are identified by like reference numerals, and, more particularly to
The body 22 of the lock 20 comprises a hollow substantially cylindrical outer shell 26 that encloses most of the lock's components. The shank 24 is secured to the body by retention in an axially extending central aperture 30 in a socket 28 that is secured in one end of the outer shell. The socket 28 includes a first portion having a circular cross-section with external threads to engage mating internal threads on the interior of the hollow outer shell.
The shank 24 is typically a hardened, cylindrical pin that may be tethered to the lock's body by a cable or other device. The shank 24 includes portions defining a circumferential groove 32 having a diameter that is reduced from the nominal diameter of the shank. Referring to
Radial displacement of the shank retaining ball is controlled by axial displacement of a spider 40 that is slidably arranged in the interior of the outer shell 26. The spider 40 comprises generally a disk portion 40A having substantially planar surfaces arranged normal to the longitudinal axis of the outer shell and a sector 40B that projects axially with the outer shell from one surface of the disk portion. To guide the axial movement of the spider in the outer shell, the disk and the axially projecting sector have curved external surfaces corresponding to the curvature of the internal diameter of the outer shell. The axially projecting sector includes an interior surface arranged adjacent to and movable relative to an exterior surface 28A of a second portion of the socket 28. The interior surface of the sector comprises a first surface 40C that is arranged substantially parallel to the adjacent surface of the socket and a second surface 40D comprising a relieved area located adjacent the end of the sector distal of the disk portion. With the spider in a first or shank securing position, a shank retaining ball 36, retained in a radial aperture 34 in the socket 28, is prevented from moving radially outward, to disengage the groove in the shank, by the first interior surface 40C of the corresponding sector of the spider 40. Displacing the spider axially to a second or shank releasing position, where the respective relieved second surface 40D is aligned coincident with the radial aperture in the socket, permits the ball to move outward and disengage from the groove in the shank.
The axial position of the spider in the outer shell is varied by rotation of the lock's core. A spider return spring 42, located in an axially extending hole in the socket, bears against the disk portion of the spider to elastically urge axial movement of the spider toward the shank releasing position. However, a ball 44, functioning as a cam follower and engaging the planar surface of the disk portion of the spider, bears against one of the surfaces of a cam that comprises the rear surface of the lock core 50. The cam comprises a first cam surface 60A that is spaced axially apart from a second cam surface 60B and a ramp surface 60C connecting the first and second cam surfaces. When the core is rotated relative to cam follower ball 44, the ball to moves from the one surface of the cam to the other to axially displace the spider. When rotation of the cam causes the cam follower ball to engage with the surface axially farther from the socket, the spider return spring moves the spider axially to the shank releasing position. When the core 50 is rotated to move the cam follower ball 44 to the cam surface nearer the socket, the cam follower ball moves the spider against the elastic force of the spider return spring to the shank securing position.
The rotatable core 50 of the exemplary lock 20 comprises a substantially cylindrical back core 60 and a substantially hollow cylindrical front core 52. The front core 52 and the back core 60 are joined to rotate together by an axially extending projection 60D on the back core that engages a corresponding axial slot in the wall of the front core. The rearmost surface of the back core 60 comprises the surfaces 60A, 60B, 60C of the cam. The interior of the front core 52 is divided into front 52A and rear 528 portions. Most of the electrical components of the lock are housed within the rear portion of the hollow front core. The key is mechanically and electrically engageable with a keyway 54 in the front portion of the front core.
Referring to
An electrical interface for the key 200 and the lock 20 is accomplished through corresponding key electrical contacts 208 and lock electrical contacts 70 that are, respectively, located within the peripheries of the key's nosepiece and the lock's keyway. When the nosepiece of the key is inserted into the keyway, springs elastically urge the key's electrical contacts into engagement with the corresponding electrical contacts of the lock. The key's contacts are electrically connected to the key's microprocessor and battery, but insulated from the key's housing. Likewise, the electrical contacts in the keyway are connected to the electrical components of the lock but insulated from the core. The contacts provide an electrical connection between the lock 20 and the key 200, enabling bi-directional data communication and enabling the battery in the key to supply power to the lock's electrical system.
The locking mechanism of a lock commonly includes one or more locking pins movable in the lock's core and engageable with the lock's body, to prevent rotation of the core in the body unless a correctly coded input is received. When the correct input is received, the locking pin(s) is released enabling rotation of the core and release of the shank. The locking mechanism of the exemplary barrel lock 20 is an electro-mechanical system comprising a solenoid assembly, a locking pin 72 and locking pin spring 74. The solenoid assembly including a solenoid coil 76 and a spring loaded, solenoid plunger 78 is centrally mounted in the front core 52. The solenoid plunger 78 is elastically urged to extend from the solenoid coil by a solenoid spring. The solenoid plunger is supported in a plunger guide 80 that has a flange that engages the internal diameter of the front core and an axially extending central sleeve including a central aperture through which the solenoid plunger protrudes. When no power is supplied to the solenoid coil 76, the spring loaded solenoid plunger 78 is urged to extend from the solenoid coil. The plunger 78 interferes with radial displacement of the locking pin in the direction of the center of the core 50. The head portion of the locking pin 72 engages a recess 90A in an axial central aperture of a hollow, cylindrical intermediate shell 90 in which the core is selectively rotatable.
To unlock the lock, a user inserts the nosepiece of the key into the keyway at the front end of the core 50. Data and power are passed between the lock and the key. A printed circuit board 82 that includes a lock microprocessor and a memory is mounted in the front core. The lock microprocessor checks the data received from the key against data in its memory and, if the received data contains the correct code, the microprocessor connects the solenoid to the key's battery causing the solenoid plunger 78 to be drawn toward the solenoid coil 76 and away from the locking pin 72 freeing the locking pin to translate toward the center of the core. When the user turns the key in the keyway 54, a sloping surface on the head portion of the locking pin 72 urges the locking pin toward the center of the core and out of engagement with the recess in the intermediate core.
Locks can be attacked in a number of ways by persons seeking unauthorized access. Mechanical pin tumblers can be picked by inserting a tool into the keyway and manually manipulating the tumbler stacks. While electronic locks are not subject to attack by manual tumbler picking, they can be attacked by other methods, some of which are also used to attack mechanical locks. A lock may be attacked by inserting an object into the keyway and applying torque to the core in an attempt to overload and destroy the locking mechanism. The locking mechanism, including the locking pin and the portion of the body that is engaged by the locking pin, must be sufficiently robust to resist any torque that can be applied to the keyway. Another method of attacking a lock is to drill into the face of the core to destroy the components of the locking mechanism and release the locking pin's engagement with the lock's body.
The present inventor recognized that when the locking mechanism secures rotation of the core relative to the lock's body, the locking mechanism must be strong enough to resist any torque that can be applied to rotate the core. In other words, the components of the locking mechanism must be sufficiently strong to withstand a torque that will cause failure of the stronger of the key or the keyway. However, increasing the strength of the components of the locking mechanism usually requires increasing the size and weight of the lock which is undesirable and can make the lock unsuitable for some applications. Moreover, increasing the strength of the locking mechanism does not improve the lock's security when attacked by drilling into the core.
The inventor also recognized that a drill exerts substantial torque on an object in overcoming the resistance at the cutting edge of the drill bit and, if an equivalent counter-torque is not exerted on the object, the object will rotate with the drill bit and the drill bit will not cut into the surface. The inventor realized that the torque exerted on a lock core by a drilling attack is substantially greater than the torque required to rotate the unlatched core of the lock. Likewise, the maximum torque that can be exerted at the keyway is typically substantially greater than the torque required to rotate the unlatched core. The inventor reasoned that a lock's resistance to drilling and excessive torque could be improved and the size of the lock reduced by limiting the maximum torque that can be exerted on the locking mechanism to a torque sufficient to ensure rotation of the unlatched core.
The shank is released from the body of the lock when the cam surfaces of the core are moved, by rotation of the core, relative to the cam follower ball. On the other hand, the inventor concluded that concurrent rotation of the core and the guide for the cam follower ball would produce equatorial movement of the cam follower ball on the planar, lateral surface of the spider but would not produce the axial displacement of the spider necessary to release the shank. The inventor concluded that by arranging the core to selectively rotate in an intermediate shell that is, in turn, rotatable in the outer shell of the lock and limiting the torque that can be applied to the core to the torque necessary to rotate the unlatched core in the intermediate shell, the lock would be less vulnerable to attacks by either the application of excessive torque to the keyway or drilling.
In the exemplary barrel lock 20, the locking pin 72 is engageable with a recess in the internal diameter of the intermediate shell 90 which comprises a hollow cylinder that is closed at the rear end proximate the spider 40. The intermediate shell is arranged to be rotatable in the outer shell 26 of the lock's body. When the locking pin 72 is in engagement with the intermediate shell 90, the rotational position of the core 50 is fixed relative to the intermediate shell and torque applied to the core causes the core and the intermediate shell to rotate in unison. The cam follower ball 44 is guided in an axial aperture 92 in the end wall of the intermediate shell and, therefore, rotates in unison with the intermediate shell. Since the planar surface of the spider, in contact with the cam follower ball, is arranged normal to the longitudinal axis of the outer shell, the relative positions of the cam surfaces and the cam follower ball do not change during concurrent rotation of the core and the intermediate shell. As a result, the axial positions of the cam follower ball 44 and the spider are unchanged by concurrent rotation of intermediate shell and the core and the state of the shank's engagement will also be unchanged.
When the solenoid is actuated to unlatch the locking mechanism, the core 50 is freed to rotate relative to the intermediate shell 90. A detent resists relative movement of the intermediate shell and the outer shell to assure that the unlatched core will rotate in the intermediate shell before the intermediate shell rotates in the outer shell. A detent member 94, axially movable in an aperture in the socket 28 which is fixed to the outer shell 26, is elastically urged toward the intermediate shell by a detent spring 96. Referring also to
When the core 50 is rotated relative to the intermediate shell, the cam surfaces 60A, 60B of the core move relative to the cam follower ball 44 and the ball is displaced axially as it moves from the one cam surface to the other. When the ball moves to the cam surface more distal of the socket, the spider return spring 42 displaces the spider 40 toward the front of the lock permitting the relieved second inner surfaces 40D of the spider's axial projections to coincide with the radial apertures 30 in which the shank retaining balls are retained. The shank retaining ball can move radially to accommodate the larger nominal diameter of the shank permitting the shank to be removed from or inserted into the socket. When the cam surface is rotated relative to the cam follower guide so that the cam follower ball 44 is engaged with the cam surface nearer the socket, the cam follower ball is displaced axially toward the rear of the lock. The shank retaining ball 36 can not move radially because of interference with the inner surfaces of the projections of the spider and are trapped in the groove in the shank to secure the shank to the lock's body.
The lock 20 provides superior resistance to attack by the exertion excessive force on the keyway or by drilling into the core by limiting the maximum torque that can be exerted on the locking mechanism and the core to a level that is only sufficient to ensure rotation of the unlatched core. A detent asserts sufficient resistance to rotation to permit the unlatched core to rotate relative to the intermediate shell but limits the maximum torque that can be exerted on the core by a drill or an object engaging the keyway before the intermediate shell is rotated in the outer shell by the core.
The detailed description, above, sets forth numerous specific details to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well known methods, procedures, components, and circuitry have not been described in detail to avoid obscuring the present invention.
All the references cited herein are incorporated by reference.
The terms and expressions that have been employed in the foregoing specification are used as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention, in the use of such terms and expressions, of excluding equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, it being recognized that the scope of the invention is defined and limited only by the claims that follow.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/212,894, filed Aug. 26, 2005, now abandoned.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1564463 | Best | Dec 1925 | A |
1654752 | Raleigh | Jan 1928 | A |
2082806 | Michel | Jun 1937 | A |
2124936 | Wehrs | Jul 1938 | A |
2763888 | Billeter | Sep 1956 | A |
2855588 | Allen | Oct 1958 | A |
3093994 | Richard | Jun 1963 | A |
3134254 | Richard | May 1964 | A |
3206595 | Best | Sep 1965 | A |
3332713 | DeClaire et al. | Jul 1967 | A |
3392558 | Hedin et al. | Jul 1968 | A |
3403380 | Welch | Sep 1968 | A |
3404549 | Best | Oct 1968 | A |
3418833 | Kerr | Dec 1968 | A |
3508031 | Cooper, Jr. | Apr 1970 | A |
3509748 | Trainor | May 1970 | A |
3641396 | Kossen et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3651464 | Hedin et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3660729 | James et al. | May 1972 | A |
3731963 | Pond | May 1973 | A |
3733861 | Lester | May 1973 | A |
3798935 | Blekking et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3843174 | Bogunovich et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3854310 | Paul et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3859634 | Perron et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3872435 | Cestaro | Mar 1975 | A |
3939679 | Barker et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3944976 | France | Mar 1976 | A |
3953991 | Grossman | May 1976 | A |
RE29259 | Sabsay | Jun 1977 | E |
RE29341 | Peters et al. | Aug 1977 | E |
4040279 | Signorelli et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4049313 | Lundberg | Sep 1977 | A |
4051548 | Hamada | Sep 1977 | A |
4083424 | von den Stemmen et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4099752 | Geringer | Jul 1978 | A |
4127966 | Schmidt | Dec 1978 | A |
4148092 | Martin | Apr 1979 | A |
4157534 | Schachter | Jun 1979 | A |
4193276 | Lundberg | Mar 1980 | A |
4201887 | Burns | May 1980 | A |
4209782 | Donath et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4262504 | Inoue | Apr 1981 | A |
4294093 | Best et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4317157 | Eckloff | Feb 1982 | A |
4353064 | Stamm | Oct 1982 | A |
4428211 | Hermann | Jan 1984 | A |
4525805 | Prosan et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4557121 | Charlton | Dec 1985 | A |
4578969 | Larson | Apr 1986 | A |
4579376 | Charlton | Apr 1986 | A |
4594637 | Falk | Jun 1986 | A |
4603564 | Kleinhäny et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4626007 | Larson | Dec 1986 | A |
4631939 | Herriott | Dec 1986 | A |
4633688 | Beudat et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4702094 | Peterson | Oct 1987 | A |
4712398 | Clarkson et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4727368 | Larson et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4732022 | Oliver | Mar 1988 | A |
4744021 | Kristy | May 1988 | A |
4766746 | Henderson et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4771620 | Kleinhäny | Sep 1988 | A |
4789859 | Clarkson et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4798068 | Nakauchi | Jan 1989 | A |
4810861 | Herriott et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4829296 | Clark et al. | May 1989 | A |
4831851 | Larson | May 1989 | A |
4838051 | Yang | Jun 1989 | A |
4856310 | Parienti | Aug 1989 | A |
4870400 | Downs et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4887292 | Barrett et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4895036 | Larson et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4896246 | Henderson et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4909053 | Zipf, III et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4914732 | Henderson et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4916443 | Barrett et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4916927 | O'Connell et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4929880 | Henderson et al. | May 1990 | A |
4936894 | Larson et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4947163 | Henderson et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4962449 | Schlesinger | Oct 1990 | A |
4982587 | Tzou | Jan 1991 | A |
4988987 | Barrett et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5010750 | Böser et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5046084 | Barrett et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5090222 | Imran | Feb 1992 | A |
5136869 | Best | Aug 1992 | A |
5140317 | Hyatt, Jr. et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5148690 | Wang | Sep 1992 | A |
5177988 | Bushnell | Jan 1993 | A |
5181406 | Wolter | Jan 1993 | A |
5193372 | Sieg et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5216909 | Armoogam | Jun 1993 | A |
5245329 | Gokcebay | Sep 1993 | A |
5245652 | Larson et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5267460 | Burleigh | Dec 1993 | A |
5280518 | Danler et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5319362 | Hyatt, Jr. | Jun 1994 | A |
5335520 | Lee | Aug 1994 | A |
5339662 | Goldman | Aug 1994 | A |
5361614 | Metcalf | Nov 1994 | A |
5367295 | Gokcebay et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5421178 | Hamel et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5475375 | Barrett et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5507162 | Chhatwal | Apr 1996 | A |
5542274 | Thordmark et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550529 | Burge | Aug 1996 | A |
5552777 | Gokcebay et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5582050 | Häggström | Dec 1996 | A |
5602536 | Henderson et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5609051 | Donaldson | Mar 1997 | A |
5654696 | Barrett et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5664449 | Sedley | Sep 1997 | A |
5705991 | Kniffin et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5745044 | Hyatt, Jr. et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5768921 | Hill | Jun 1998 | A |
5791177 | Bianco | Aug 1998 | A |
5794465 | Hill | Aug 1998 | A |
5826450 | Lerchner et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5839307 | Field et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5856771 | Nippert | Jan 1999 | A |
5902209 | Moody | May 1999 | A |
5911401 | Hrytzak et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5987940 | Chang | Nov 1999 | A |
6000609 | Gokcebay et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005487 | Hyatt, Jr. et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012311 | Duckwall | Jan 2000 | A |
6082153 | Schoell et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6085560 | Dalton, Jr. | Jul 2000 | A |
6125673 | Luker | Oct 2000 | A |
6155089 | Hurskainen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6334347 | Iscla | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6386006 | DeWalch | May 2002 | B1 |
6402181 | Lee | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6474122 | Davis | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6543260 | Koy et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6564600 | Davis | May 2003 | B1 |
6564601 | Hyatt, Jr. | May 2003 | B2 |
6604394 | Davis | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6615625 | Davis | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6718806 | Davis | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6758073 | Yu | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6854302 | Zapushek et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6862905 | Zapushek | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6895792 | Davis | May 2005 | B2 |
6913413 | Yang | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6981396 | Kim | Jan 2006 | B1 |
20070137266 | Hsai | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070180871 | Irgens et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
44 10 783 | Apr 1995 | DE |
0128991 | Dec 1984 | EP |
0290330 | Aug 1989 | EP |
1 525 033 | Sep 1976 | GB |
2024922 | Jan 1980 | GB |
2 119 548 | Nov 1983 | GB |
WO 0100956 | Apr 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080178640 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11212894 | Aug 2005 | US |
Child | 12079498 | US |