This application claims the benefit of GB Patent Application No. 1013165.4, filed on Aug. 5,2010, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
This invention relates to a lockable downhole tool and in particular, but not exclusively, to a lockable reamer or under-reamer. The invention also relates to a method of using such a tool.
In the oil and gas exploration and production industry, bores are drilled from surface to access sub-surface hydrocarbon bearing formations. The drilled bores are lined with tubing, known as casing or liner, and cement is injected into the annulus between the casing and surrounding bore wall. Typically, the bore is drilled in sections, and after drilling a section that section is lined with casing. Following cementing of the casing, the next section of bore is drilled. However, as the drill bit utilised to drill the next section must pass through the existing casing, the drill bit will of necessity be of smaller diameter than the drill bit used to drill the previous section. It is often considered desirable to enlarge the bore diameter below a section of casing beyond the drill bit diameter, and this is normally achieved by means of an under-reamer mounted above the drill bit. The under-reamer and drill bit may be arranged to cut rock simultaneously, or the under-reamer may be selectively activated to ream selected sections of an existing bore.
During reaming operations, rock cuttings and other debris are created and recovered from the well bore by circulating fluid down the drill pipe and returning the fluid up the annulus created between the drill pipe and the well bore casing. After all reaming operations have been completed, the drill pipe conveyed under-reaming tool is recovered from the well bore by pulling the drill pipe, in sections or stands, from the well bore. During recovery of the under-reaming tool it may be necessary to circulate fluid down through the drill pipe and subsequently up the annulus in order to clear obstructions caused by debris remaining in the annulus. Under these circumstances, a hydraulically activated under-reamer may experience sufficient differential pressure, between the internal tubing and the annulus, to activate the internal mechanism causing the cutters to move radially outwards and contact the casing lining the well bore. Simultaneous lateral or rotational movement of the under-reamer in this condition will cause damage to the casing or damage to the under-reaming tool. As it is common practice to rotate the drill pipe during debris clean-out operations so as to agitate the debris, an inappropriately extended reamer tool could cause significant and extensive damage.
According to an aspect of the present invention there is provided a downhole tool comprising: a body; at least one extendable cutting member operable to cooperate with a hydraulically actuated cam member, and a cam member lock configurable to be activated downhole to restrict movement of the cam member relative to the body and prevent extension of the cutting member.
According to another aspect of the invention there is provided a downhole operation comprising:
running a downhole tool into a bore;
extending a cutting member from a body of the tool;
retracting the cutting member;
activating a lock to prevent subsequent extension of the cutting member; and
retrieving the tool from the bore.
The invention facilitates retrieval of the tool, typically in the form of a reaming tool, more particularly an under reamer, with the cutting member locked in the retracted configuration. Embodiments of the invention allow an operator to circulate fluid through the locked tool, for example to facilitate hole cleaning, safe in the knowledge that the cutting member will be retained in the retracted position.
The cam member lock may take any appropriate form and in one embodiment may be a mechanical lock. The lock may be configurable to create a mechanical interference or lock between a part of the cam member and a part of the body. The lock may provide the interference directly, or may interact with another element, which may be an element of the body or the cam member to create or provide the interference. For example, the lock may support a dog or collet finger in a locking configuration. In other embodiments the lock may take other forms, for example a hydraulic or magnetic lock.
The cam member lock may include a portion adapted for location between the body and the cam member and configured to restrict movement therebetween. Said portion may include one or more collet fingers. The lock may be mounted in the body above the cam member and may be adapted to cooperate with an upper end portion of the cam member. This may facilitate retrofitting of the lock to an existing tool, where the upper end of one or both of the cam member and body may be modified to accommodate the lock.
The lock may be actuated by any appropriate means. In one embodiment, the lock may be configured to be activated by using a device dropped or pumped from surface, for example a ball or dart. The device may be configured to cooperate with a portion of the lock to permit creation of a differential pressure across the lock and permit hydraulic actuation of the lock, which may involve pressure-induced longitudinal translation of a portion of the lock. The lock may be initially retained in or biased towards an inactive configuration. The lock may define a fluid passage and the device may substantially occlude the passage. In one embodiment the lock may define a seat and the device may be configured to land on the seat to restrict or prevent flow through the lock. In moving the lock to the locking position a fluid flow path may be reestablished through the lock.
The cam member may be biased towards a configuration in which the cutters are retracted. The cam member and lock may be configured such that the cam member may move to cutter-retracted position while the lock is activated. Thus, the lock may be activated while the cutting member is extended and the cam member is permitted to return to the retracted configuration and is then latched or locked in the retracted configuration. This allows the lock to be activated without requiring fluid circulation to be stopped or reduced for an extended period.
These and other aspects of the present will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Reference is first made to
As described above, during recovery of the under-reamer 10 following completion of a reaming operation, fluid may be circulated down through the drill string and subsequently up the annulus. The drill string and the under-reamer 10 may be rotated as this fluid circulation takes place. If the differential pressure between the interior of the under-reamer and the annulus is sufficient, the differential pressure acting across the piston 22 may be sufficient to move the cam member downwardly and extend the cutters 16, causing damage to the well bore casing.
Reference is now made to
The illustrated reamer 40 corresponds to a conventional reamer 10 which has been retrofitted with a lock arrangement in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Thus, the reamers 40, 10 share a number of common features. However, the upper or return sub 32 of the reamer 10 has been replaced with an alternative top sub 42 and pin sub 44 in the reamer 40. Also, the funnel 26 has been replaced by a modified funnel 46 featuring an external shoulder 48 with a toothed surface.
The top sub 42 receives the modified funnel 46 and accommodates a cam member lock in the form of an activation piston 52, shown in
The lower end of the activation piston 52 is located within a lower housing 58 and includes a gripping collett 60 which is initially located above the funnel shoulder 48 and an opposing shoulder 62 formed on the lower housing 58.
While the under-reamer 40 is in use, the activation piston 52 remains in the inactive configuration as illustrated in
Once the gripping collett 60 has engaged with the funnel shoulder surface, subsequent application of differential pressure across the under-reamer piston 22 will still urge the funnel 46 to move downwards. However, this force generates a radially inward acting reaction from the lower housing shoulder 62, increasing the engagement between the gripping collett 60 and the funnel shoulder 48. The funnel 46 and the other associated elements of the assembly 20, including the cam member 18, are thus locked against axial movement relative to the tool body. Accordingly, as the tool is recovered from the well bore, unrestricted fluid circulation through the drill string with simultaneous rotation and up and down movement of the drill string may be commenced without the risk of the cutters 16 extending and damaging the casing or the reamer 40.
It should also be noted that the cam lock activation piston 52 may be moved downwards while the reamer cutters 16 are in the extended configuration, and the funnel shoulder 48 is not aligned with the housing shoulder 62. However, once the differential pressure falls, the spring 28 lifts the assembly and positions the funnel shoulder 48 beneath the flexible gripping collett fingers 60. The ratchet-like formations on the funnel shoulder surface and the gripping collett face will prevent subsequent movement of the funnel 46 in the downward direction.
It will be apparent to those of skill in the art that the above described embodiment is merely exemplary of the present invention, and that various modifications and improvements may be made thereto, without departing from the scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1013165.4 | Aug 2010 | GB | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
904344 | Maples | Nov 1908 | A |
1485642 | Stone | Apr 1922 | A |
1810201 | Campbell | Dec 1928 | A |
3433313 | Brown | Mar 1969 | A |
4889197 | Boe | Dec 1989 | A |
5368114 | Tandberg et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
6732817 | Dewey et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
7252163 | Ollerenshaw et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7493971 | Nevlud et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7658241 | Lassoie et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7681666 | Radford et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7703553 | Eddison et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7757787 | Mackay et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7823663 | Eddison | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20050205305 | Stout et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20080070038 | Vincent et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20100089583 | Xu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2147033 | May 1985 | GB |
2446294 | Aug 2008 | GB |
330479 | Apr 2011 | NO |
2004048744 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004097163 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005103435 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2007017651 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2008070052 | Jun 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, “Wellbore Enlargement for a Deepwater Casing Program: Case Study and Developments, Abstract”, Mar. 2-4, 2004, Dallas, TX, pp. 1-11. |
Search Report dated Oct. 26, 2010 for United Kingdom patent application No. GB1013165.4 (3 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120031673 A1 | Feb 2012 | US |