The disclosure relates generally to a locking cap that may have sensors and a processor embedded into the locking cap.
A need exists to provide a security device to reduce unauthorized teenage, or other unauthorized user, from taking other people's prescription drugs. The unauthorized user is likely to abuse the prescription drug. There is a problem with unauthorized users taking potentially harmful and addictive prescription medications from unmonitored medicine cabinets. People are unaware about how vulnerable their prescriptions can be when the only security device protecting them is a child proof cap. Thus, it is desirable to add a security measure to a bottle. With a more secure bottle, fewer unauthorized users will have access to potentially dangerous and addictive medications. The device prevents an unauthorized user from taking a few pills that could go unnoticed by the prescription drug holder. For example, the security device can be broken in order to gain access, but this action would be noticeable by the prescription drug holder, and therefore further security actions can be taken.
There is further an adherence issue for prescriptions in which it is desirable to be able to provide reminders of actions to be taken, when actions are taken and/or reporting actions taken since compliance is a significant problem.
The disclosure is particularly applicable to a locking cap with embedded sensors and a processor used to prevent unauthorized access to medical prescriptions and compliance and it is in this context that the disclosure will be described. It will be appreciated, however, that the locking cap may be used to secure any other types of content in a container and the locking cap can be of different sizes and shapes to fit onto various different shaped containers.
The locking cap is a processor, such as a microprocessor or a microcontroller, etc., controlled device with sensors that may be embedded in the locking cap or the closure and this locking cap may provide information on use of the locking cap and the activity of the user. The locking cap with the embedded processor and sensors may also allow remote actuation to open or close the locking cap. This locking closure/cap allows a user to secure medication or other substances in a container, then have access to the medication or substances using a manual mechanical combination lock or an automated remote control. The remote opening/closing feature can be user to extract and store valuable use information in the locking cap or that is then sent to a remote computing device.
The electronic circuits 32 may also include software (a plurality of lines of computer code or microcode) that may be executed by the processor of the electronic circuit 32 to configure the processor to provide different functions. For example, the software may provide interfaces with time, frequency, compliance and reporting systems and may provide authentication of authorized users.
The locking cap may include a mechanical locking closure (the combination lock) as well as the electronic circuits with an actuator shown in
The locking cap may register with remote devices/emails/websites/corporate systems. Thus, the locking cap may be used with digital health records or any electronic record system. The locking cap thus can be used for compliance on controlled substances and it can be used for reporting proper and improper uses of the medication/substance. The remote use of any bottle or container can be used that may need reporting or compliance or just provide information. In addition, employee management is another use of the locking cap.
As shown in
Returning to
The cam 504d in
The locking cap may further comprise a reset mechanism that allows the user to reset the combination lock. The device may thus have a reset pin that allows the user to reset the numerical combination to which the cogs must be turned (1234, for example in this implementation) by the user to open the device. The reset pin does not need to be a specific shape as any element/pin inserted into the reset hole would work (as long as the system is unlocked). To reset the cap locking device, the device must be unlocked (lock plate down in one embodiment) and the user puts the reset pin 93 through the reset hole of the housing. The reset pin then passes through the reset indent/outlet, and comes in contact with the cam 504a. All the cams 504a, 504b, 504c, 504d are able to move slightly along the axel. The cams 504a, 504b, 504c, 504d are held against their corresponding numeric cog by the spring 510 which sits at opposing end of the axel 500. The reset pin pushes the cams which move together compressing the spring 510 at the far end. The slight offset of the cams from the numeric cogs forced by the reset pin and allowed by the compression of the spring 510 permits the numeric cogs to spin independent from the cams. When the numeric cogs spin independent from the cams the user can reset the system to a new combination. With the new combination aligned across the center of the cap the user releases the reset pin which causes the cams to slide back into place with the numeric cogs. The spring 510 causes the numeric cogs and cams to pair making them spin dependently with each other, thus allowing users to personalize the numbers. A user can only reset to a personal combination when the system is unlocked. The locking plate can be in two positions, up (locked) or down (unlocked).
Once the cam assembly and locking plate are placed into the housing, a housing cover 550A is attached to the housing 550. The housing cover 550A holds the components of the numeric cogs and the lock plate in place in the device. The numeric cogs 502 stick above the housing cover 550A when the device is assembled so that a user can spin the cogs on their axel. The device has, below the housing cover when the device is assembled, a dog cap 42. The dog cap 42 slips into the housing 550 from the bottom and spins freely (when locked) within the housing. To hold the dog cap in the housing, a lower housing 56 is attached to the lower part of the housing. The dog cap 42 is slightly smaller than the housing that contains it which allows the dog cap 42 to spin freely (when locked) within the housing. When unlocked, a lock arm 40 of the lock plate 36 engages the dog cap 42 allowing the user to put tension on the cap and remove the cap from the container to which the locking cap 24 is attached. To attach the locking cap 24 onto the container 26, the user twists an unlocked cap onto a bottle, twists tight, and then mixes up the numbers which lifts the lock plate 36 and allows the dog cap 42 to spin freely thus locking the cap and access to the contents of the container. This allows for a greater safety and security measure for the contents within any container 90 since unlocking the cap requires the numerical code as well as being able to push down the cap and remove it from the bottle. When the locking cap is in an unlocked position, the lock plate 36 moves downward and interacts with the extensions on the dog plate 52 (shown in
The electromagnetic locking components 52 further includes a processor 48, such as any commercially available microprocessor or microcontroller, that controls the operation of the electromagnetic locking components 52. In particular, the processor 48 may receive a remote command (such as over a wireless communications path like Bluetooth) to open the container and may then provide a signal/command to a solenoid 602 (shown in
As described above for the first embodiment, this embodiment of the locking cap 24 has the electronic circuits 32 (shown in
The locking cap may register with remote devices/emails/websites/corporate systems. Thus, the locking cap may be used with digital health records or any electronic record system. The locking cap thus can be used for compliance on controlled substances and it can be used for reporting proper and improper uses of the medication/substance. The remote use of any bottle or container can be used that may need reporting or compliance or just provide information. In addition, employee management is another use of the locking cap.
While the foregoing has been with reference to a particular embodiment of the disclosure, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes in this embodiment may be made without departing from the principles and spirit of the disclosure, the scope of which is defined by the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit under 35 USC 119(e) and priority under 35 USC 120 to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/136,501, filed Mar. 21, 2015 and entitled “Locking Cap with Processor”, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1358352 | Wheelock | Nov 1920 | A |
2009216 | Anibal | Jul 1935 | A |
3151756 | Gruen | Oct 1964 | A |
3426932 | Rouse | Feb 1969 | A |
3445021 | Johnson | May 1969 | A |
3684117 | Leopoldi et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3843007 | Meyer | Oct 1974 | A |
3901407 | Mitchell et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3998078 | Detwiler | Dec 1976 | A |
4366687 | Atkinson | Jan 1983 | A |
4383425 | Orabona | May 1983 | A |
4520641 | Bako | Jun 1985 | A |
4794768 | Moser et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4829796 | Kim | May 1989 | A |
4907430 | Hong | Mar 1990 | A |
4984698 | Stuckey | Jan 1991 | A |
5277325 | Yan | Jan 1994 | A |
5493279 | Dawson | Feb 1996 | A |
5911764 | Wei Kong | Jun 1999 | A |
6688146 | Michels et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6786346 | Gurnard et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6793081 | Derman | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6912878 | Beldeti, Jr. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6988642 | Gallo, Jr. et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7243515 | Meyer | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7350655 | Belden, Jr. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7677065 | Miao | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7891220 | Yen | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8020415 | Corbin | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8662330 | Simposn | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8931652 | Small | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8938999 | Dahl | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8944263 | Michels et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
9133649 | Taylor | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9199773 | Simpson | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9278789 | Simpson | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9367984 | Daugbjerg | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9452872 | Simpson | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9573743 | Simpson | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9758989 | Simpson | Sep 2017 | B1 |
20030089145 | Michels et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040011098 | Yang | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20060207958 | Hamer | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070131007 | Hacker | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080098939 | Kalous et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080302794 | Wagner et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090108016 | Brown | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20110049079 | Simpson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110049080 | Simpson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110079058 | Nielsen | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110210136 | Wang | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2897860 | May 2007 | CN |
Entry |
---|
First Office Action for CN 201080049649.2 (English and Chinese; dated Dec. 25, 2013 (15 pgs.). |
PCT/US2010/047589 International Preliminary Report Search Report dated Mar. 6, 2012 (7 pages). |
PCT International Search Report of PCT/US10/47589; dated Oct. 22, 2010 (2 pgs.). |
PCT Written Opinion of PCT/US10/47589; dated Oct. 22, 2010 (6 pgs.). |
Extended European Search Report of EP 10814459.3; dated Dec. 12, 2012 (4 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62136501 | Mar 2015 | US |