This application is a national stage application of PCT/AU2012/000429, filed Apr. 26, 2012, which claims priority to Australian Patent Application No. 2011-901857, filed May 16, 2011, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The present invention relates to locking devices and particularly relates to an electromechanical locking device for use at the top or side of a door.
Electromechanical locking devices are used in security and access control arrangements for buildings. One such locking device, commonly known as a “drop-bolt”, is intended for fitting in the door frame above the top of a door. The device includes an electrically activated bolt which is moveable between an extended position, where it engages with a recess in the top of the door to lock the door, and a retracted position, where the bolt is withdrawn from the recess in the door, allowing the door to be opened.
There is a problem with drop-bolts caused by a condition known as “preload”. That is, when the bolt is extended, and there is some sideways pressure on the door, such as caused by a person leaning on the door, or due to differing air pressures on either side of the door, then the locking device may be unable to withdraw the bolt, and so the door is not able to be unlocked.
Some have tried to overcome the problem of preload by way of locking devices which utilise a roller nut that is driven by a screw shaft. The roller nut engages with a pivotal bolt to rotate the bolt to an extended position. However, such devices are typically complex in their construction and involve a large number of moving parts. Locks with large numbers of moving parts can be expensive to manufacture and the large number of parts introduce opportunities for component failure, and provide potential opportunities for intruders to compromise the lock.
In a first aspect the present invention provides a locking device including: a rotary motor; a worm drive arrangement including a worm and a gear; and a pivotally mounted bolt which is rotatable between a retracted position and an extended position; the motor is arranged to drive the worm to rotate the gear; as the gear rotates it cooperates with a cam formation associated with the bolt to move the bolt between the retracted and extended positions.
The motor may drive the worm by way of a reduction gearbox.
When the bolt is in the extended position, an attempt to force the bolt to rotate to the retracted position may set up a force on the gear, and the direction of the force may be substantially parallel to the direction of a line passing through the axis of rotation of the gear.
The rotation of the gear may be monitored by at least one microswitch.
The locking device may further include a return spring for moving the bolt from the extended to the retracted position.
The locking device may further include a charge storage means; and the lock can be arranged so that, if power to the lock is cut, the motor is powered by the storage means to drive the worm to cause the bolt to move to the retracted position.
In a second aspect the present invention provides a locking device which is arranged to be powered by an external power supply and including: an electric power storage means; and wherein the power storage means is arranged to operate the lock in the event of disconnection or failure of the external power supply to move the lock from a locked to an unlocked condition.
An embodiment of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring to
Gear 20 includes a first projection 22 and a second projection 24. As gear 20 rotates, these projections cooperate with various surfaces of cam formation 34 as will be described.
Lock 10 includes on onboard controller board which controls the supply of power to the motor to control the lock. Microswitches 40, 42 detect the angular position of gear 20 by way of being actuated when indentations on the gear 20 correspond with the positions of the microswitches.
In use, the locking device is mounted at the top or side of the doorframe. The bolt 30 is pivotally rotatable between a retracted position as shown in
Lock 10 includes a power storage device in the form of an on-board super capacitor (not illustrated) which powers the on-board controller and can be used by the on board controller to power the lock in certain circumstances. The super capacitor is maintained in a fully charged state by power supplied by a building control system. In other embodiments, the power storage device may be a battery or other means of storing electric power.
In use, locking device 10 is part of a building wide installation and is controlled in a building from a security control centre in the building. Building control systems typically control locks using either a “two-wire” or a “three-wire” system. In a three-wire system, power is constantly supplied using two of the wires, and a third wire is used to send control signals to the lock. In a two-wire system, the control system can adopt two states in which it either supplies electrical power (typically at 12V or 24V) to the lock, or it does not. The lock 10 can work with either system.
Lock 10 can operate in either of two modes known as “Fail Safe” and “Fail Secure”. When used in a three wire system in the Fail Secure mode, when the lock is in the locked condition and power to the lock is lost, then the lock remains locked. When the lock is in the unlocked condition and power to the lock is lost, then the on-board controller uses charge stored in the super capacitor to move the lock to the locked condition.
When used in a three wire system in the Fail Safe mode, when the lock is in the locked condition and power to the lock is lost, then the on-board controller uses charge stored in the super capacitor to unlock the lock. If in the unlocked condition when power is lost, the lock remains unlocked.
In a two wire system, in the Fail Secure mode, the lock is typically arranged to adopt the unlocked position when power is applied to the lock. If power to the lock is lost, then the on-board controller uses the power from the super capacitor to put the lock into the locked condition.
In a two wire system, in the Fail Safe mode, the lock is typically arranged to adopts the locked position when power is applied to the lock. If power to the lock is lost, then the on-board controller uses the power from the super capacitor to put the lock into the unlocked condition.
Operation of locking device 10 in the Fail Safe mode in a two wire system will now be explained with reference to the sequence of
Referring to
Referring to
Of particular note is the way the lock 10 resists forces applied to bolt portion 34 in an attempt to force bolt portion 34 back inside the housing 12, such as in an attempt to compromise the lock. As shown in
Explanation of returning the lock 10 to the unlocked condition will now be given. Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
It can be seen that embodiments of the invention have at least the following advantages:
Any reference to prior art contained herein is not to be taken as an admission that the information is common general knowledge, unless otherwise indicated.
Finally, it is to be appreciated that various alterations or additions may be made to the parts previously described without departing from the spirit or ambit of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2011901857 | May 2011 | AU | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/AU2012/000429 | 4/26/2012 | WO | 00 | 11/15/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/155177 | 11/22/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4825027 | Yoon | Apr 1989 | A |
5007261 | Quantz | Apr 1991 | A |
5148691 | Wallden | Sep 1992 | A |
6112563 | Ramos | Sep 2000 | A |
6302455 | Huang | Oct 2001 | B1 |
8424934 | Askins | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8876172 | Denison et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20030127866 | Martinez et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20070109097 | Coutermarsh | May 2007 | A1 |
20090178449 | Raatikainen | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20120169453 | Bryla | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130088024 | Mackle | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
777 279 | Oct 2004 | AU |
777279 | Oct 2004 | AU |
299 18 033 | Feb 2000 | DE |
1 473 425 | Nov 2004 | EP |
2006115335 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2008066210 | Jun 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report—Date of Mailing May 25, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability—Date of Mailing Mar. 7, 2013. |
European Search Report (EP 12786080.7); Dated: Jul. 6, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140183881 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |