This application claims priority from European Patent Application No. 08166740.4 filed Oct. 16, 2008, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention concerns a locking mechanism for a timepiece drive module. The invention is particularly suited to electromechanical micromotors for wristwatches.
Stepping motors are well known for converting electrical pulses into rotating mechanical movement. The first stepping motor was invented in 1936 by Mr Lavet for the clock and watch making industry; and since then these motors are found driving the movement in most quartz watches with hands. This type of motor is also commonly found in all devices where one wishes to control speed or position.
“Lavet” motors have permanent magnets that can generate stable positions between electrical pulses. The permanent torque thus exerted on the rotor, i.e. the rotating part of the motor, is supposed to prevent any inadvertent movement thereof, even when the watch undergoes shocks. The purpose of the permanent torque, which is generally selected to be considerably greater than the motor torque, is also to prevent any incrementation of more than one step simultaneously. These positioning torques do not, however, completely lock or incrementally index the meshed wheels; click systems have consequently been proposed for cooperating with these motors to improve the hold and lock functions, as for example in U.S. Pat. No. 4,647,218. In this Patent, a Lavet motor drives a wheel in rotation through 180 degrees with each electrical pulse, i.e. every minute; the wheel is fitted at two diametrically opposite ends with spigots, which engage in successive radial slots in the minute wheel. Thus, between each pulse, the two spigots are engaged in two successive radial slots of the minute wheel and prevent any possible movement thereof.
Now, other types of stepping motor are available, for example the micromechanical electromotor disclosed in EP Patent No. 1921520 by the Applicant, which includes a linear actuator fitted with an active click for driving the wheel in rotation, and a passive click for preventing the rotor from rotating in the opposite direction when the actuator returns during its oscillations. For this motor, the same locking and unitary incrementation functions would also be desirable. However, it is clear that the click mechanism described above, specific to a Lavet motor, is not suitable.
It is an object of the present invention to propose a new mechanism that locks a meshed wheel in stable indexing positions and, in parallel, prevents any incrementation thereof by more than one step simultaneously.
It is another object of the present invention to propose a locking mechanism that can be applied to any type of stepping motor, and not solely to a “Lavet” type motor.
These objects are achieved in particular owing to a device for the locking and unitary incrementation of a drive module 1 for a timepiece gear train, including an actuator 2, fitted with an active click 5 cooperating with a toothed wheel 7. Device 1 includes a first finger 8 and second finger 9 cooperating with toothed wheel 7, and is characterized in that:
first finger 8 entirely locks the rotation of said toothed wheel 7 when it is engaged in one of the teeth of said toothed wheel 7; and
second finger 9 is arranged between a first stop member 10 and a second stop member 11, and the space between stop members 10 and 11 limits the angular travel of toothed wheel 7 when said second finger 9 is engaged in one of the teeth of said toothed wheel 7.
These objects are also achieved by a locking method using the device according to the main claim and including the steps of:
(A) lowering first finger 8 and releasing the toothed wheel 7;
(B) driving toothed wheel 7 in rotation via said active click 5 of said actuator;
(C) raising first finger 8 and engaging it in one of the teeth of toothed wheel 7;
(D) releasing and returning said active click 5 of actuator 2;
(E) releasing and returning the second finger against the first stop member 10;
(F) raising the second finger 9 and engaging it in one of the teeth of said toothed wheel 7.
One advantage of the proposed solution is that it is can be applied or associated with any type of stepping motor, including for example, regulating members for mechanical watches, and potentially any type of timepiece drive module.
Another advantage of the proposed solution is that it no longer requires permanent magnets for stabilising the idle or rest position of gear trains driven by the motor.
An additional advantage of the proposed solution is that an electromechanical stepping motor no longer needs passive clicks to prevent the rotor from rotating in the opposite direction when the actuator returns during its oscillations.
Moreover, the proposed locking solution fundamentally differs from the locking system applied to the Lavet motor in that the power consumption required is not linked to the value of the maximum motor torque. An important advantage of the proposed solution is consequently that the power consumption of the locking system is potentially considerably less than that of the motor itself.
Example implementations of the invention are indicated in the description and illustrated by the annexed Figures, in which:
b illustrates a cross-section, along the plane of the motor, of the detailed actuation of the toothed wheel of the rotor with the active and passive clicks.
In
b illustrates the drive and indexing mechanism for the stepping motor of
Comparison of the steps described with reference to the annexed Figures reveals that, according to the preferred embodiment of the disclosed locking mechanism, the first finger 8 has a degree of freedom in translation (vertically in the Figures) so that it can be raised or lowered, and thus engaged in or released from one of the teeth of toothed wheel 7. Second finger 9 has this same degree of freedom in translation, and an additional degree of freedom between stop members 10 and 11 (horizontal in the Figures) which corresponds to the direction of the oscillations 4 of active click 5 and to the tangent of toothed wheel 7 where finger 9 meshes. It should however be observed that neither a correlation between the degrees of freedom of the two locking fingers 8, 9 is necessary to guarantee proper working of the invention, nor the direction of movement of the translations, which are not necessarily vertical and horizontal respectively. Moreover, it was already specified above that the degree of freedom for engaging and releasing the teeth could also be not in translation but potentially in rotation, for both first finger 8 and second finger 9. Any combination between the degree of freedom and the type of freedom of each finger 8, 9 is possible within the scope of the invention.
The sequence of movements of fingers 9, 0 follows the aforementioned steps, which are synthesised in the state diagram of
A first step A consists in lowering first finger 8, after it has been released from said toothed wheel 7, which makes the system pass from stable, “idle” or rest state 110 to a state 010 in which it is possible for the toothed wheel to rotate.
A second step B consists in driving toothed wheel 7 in rotation via active click 5 of actuator 2, which causes second locking finger 9 of stop member 10 to move in system state 010, towards the other stop member 11, which blocks the travel of the toothed wheel any further and thus brings the system into state 011.
A third step C consists in raising said first finger 8, causing it to mesh in one of the teeth of toothed wheel 7 to lock the wheel again completely, changing the system from state 011 to a stable state 111.
Step D consisting in the release and return of active click 5 of actuator 2 does not change the state of the locking system. However, step E which consists in the release and return of the second finger against the first stop member 10 can be divided into two sub-steps: E1 where the second finger is lowered changing the system from state 111 to state 101, and E2, where the system is changed from state 101 to 100. According to a preferred variant implementation of the locking method, steps D and E for the release and return of active click 5 and second finger 9 occur simultaneously.
Finally, step F consisting in raising second finger 9, which causes it to engage in one of the teeth of toothed wheel 7, returns the system to the initial state 110 called the “idle” or rest state and thus ends the incrementation cycle of one motor step.
The sequence described, which guarantees that at least one of the two fingers is always engaged in one of the teeth, either keeps the locking device in a “stable” state, i.e. in which the toothed wheel is totally immobilised (with the first finger engaged in the toothing of wheel 7), or in a “limited” state, i.e. in which the travel of the toothed wheel is limited (with the second finger 9 engaged in the toothing of wheel 7). The invention thus no longer requires the use of magnets for applying positioning torque in the idle or rest state to obtain stable states; moreover the first finger does not need to user a passive click, which is more complex to machine and consequently more expensive. Consequently, the proposed solution decreases the total cost of the locking device while improving its functions, since the angular travel of the toothed wheel is now always limited. Those skilled in the art will also observe that clicks 5 that mesh with the toothed wheel are actuated in a totally oblivious to the device and the locking method described, such that it can be applied to both electromechanical and purely mechanical timepiece trains.
According to the preferred embodiment illustrated in
Further, although, according to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the finger actuators are electrostatic, for implementation of a micromotor locking device in wristwatches, one could also imagine using hydraulic actuators for other timepiece applications. Likewise, the beveled shape of the teeth illustrated in the disclosed figures, which tends to rotate the toothed wheel anticlockwise, could be changed to a similar shape in the opposite direction or, for example, be notched to ensure that the wheel is totally locked even in the event of a shock. Indeed, this notched shape (not shown) would make it impossible for the tooth to be released via the action of forces outside the system, due to cooperation with a corresponding identical, but inverted, notched shape for the end of locking fingers 8, 9. The tooth shape illustrated in the Figures is, however, suited for meshing toothed wheels clockwise, and thus can easily be associated with a display train with hands, for example.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08166740.4 | Oct 2008 | EP | regional |