The invention relates to improvements in pipettes and automated liquid handling systems. More specifically, the invention relates to a configuration for pipette tip mounting shafts and disposable pipette tips that provides robust sealing engagement with low insertion and ejection forces as well as enhanced resistance to unintentional removal, and maintains the mounted tip in optimum position and orientation when the tip is mounted on the pipette tip mounting shaft.
The use of disposable pipette tips with handheld pipettes and automated liquid handling systems is well known. Disposable pipette tips enable repeated use of such pipetting systems to transfer different fluids or different fluid samples without carryover contamination. Disposable pipette tips are normally formed of a plastic material, such as polypropylene, and have a hollow, elongated, generally conical shape. The upper end of the pipette tip typically includes a collar that is mounted to the tip mounting shaft on the pipette device. The mounting shaft includes an internal bore through which air is displaced in order to aspirate liquid sample into and dispense liquid sample from the pipette tip. The far end of the pipette tip has a small opening through which liquid sample is received into and dispensed from the barrel of the pipette tip.
Disposable pipette tips have historically relied on tapered fits between the mounting shaft and the pipette tip collar, as well as sealing rings on the inside circumference of the pipette tip collar, to secure and seal the pipette tips to the mounting shaft. In most cases, the fit between the mounting shaft and the disposable tip is achieved by pushing the tapered mounting shaft into the tapered pipette tip collar until it wedges into the tip. At this point, a seal is achieved between the tip collar and the mounting shaft as a result of crushing the sealing ring and/or stretching the diameter of the collar. In addition to achieving a proper seal, it is also important that position and orientation of the mounted tip also be stable in the face of lateral momentum or slight knocking forces that are typical during normal use such as during touch-off on the sidewall of a vessel. In order to assure tip stability, users tend to jam the pipette mounting shaft into the tip with excessive force.
Various systems have been devised to provide proper sealing and stability without requiring excessive mounting and ejection forces. For example, the use of cylindrical mounting shafts and cylindrical tip collars lessens mounting and ejection forces. Also, it is well known to use a step within the pipette tip collar as a depth limiting means for the pipette mounting shaft. Even so, such systems typically require the force of an interference fit or stretching of the pipette tip collar to maintain stable engagement of the pipette tip and ensure a reliable seal of the collar against the mounting shaft.
A further approach is described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2005/0175511 A1 in which the pipette tip collar has inwardly projecting, cantilevered fingers that latch over a circumferential rim on the mounting shaft. In this approach, sealing is achieved by an O-ring on the mounting shaft that is located below the location of the latching engagement. Ejection of the tip is achieved by modifying the ejection mechanism on the pipette so that it can release the inwardly projecting fingers on the pipette tip before asserting pressure to eject the tip from the mounting shaft.
In one aspect, the invention relates to a pipette tip mounting shaft configuration and a disposable pipette tip having a matching configuration. In its preferred form, the pipette tip mounting shaft includes a locking section located above a lower sealing section. The locking section includes a lower stop member and two or more outwardly extending locking lobes located above the stop member. The pipette tip collar locks onto the mounting shaft when mounting shaft is fully inserted into the collar of a mating pipette tip. The bore of the pipette tip includes a circumferential shelf or shoulder separating its upper collar from the sealing area of the tip located in the upper region of the tip barrel. The collar preferably includes a locking ring located at or near the upper opening of the collar. The dimensions of the collar, and in particular the distance between the circumferential shelf and the locking ring, are selected to match the dimensions on the mounting shaft between the stop member and the upper end of the locking lobes. The locking lobes preferably include a ramp portion that gently flexes and distorts the pipette tip collar out of round as the mounting shaft is inserted into the pipette tip collar. Due to relieved portions of the mounting shaft between the lobes, the tip collar flexes to distort out of round rather than stretch in order to accommodate the interference fit over the locking lobes. This configuration results in an ergonomic, over-center locking engagement. The feel of the engagement provides tactile feedback to the user of a hand-held pipette, in part, as a result of the flexing of the upper collar as the locking ring passes over the lobes on the mounting shaft into locking engagement. At the same time, the stop member on the mounting shaft limits penetration of the mounting shaft into the tip as the stop member engages the shelf in the tip, thus providing a clear indication that the tip is fully mounted
The lower sealing area on the mounting shaft extends below the stop member. The lower sealing section is preferably tapered in a frustoconical shape, but can be cylindrical, depending on the geometry of the matching pipette tip. Similarly, the pipette tip preferably includes a sealing ring in a sealing area located below the circumferential shelf at the upper end of the pipette tip barrel. The shape of the tip sealing area should match the shape of the lower sealing section of the mounting shaft. The circumferential shelf on a pipette tip isolates the distortion of the collar from the sealing area when the tip is mounted on the mounting shaft, thus maintaining the roundness of the sealing area (i.e. a circular circumference for the inside surface of the pipette tip barrel) in which the sealing ring is located. This is important in order to facilitate reliable engagement of the sealing ring around the lower sealing section of the mounting shaft.
As the mounting shaft is pushed into the tip collar, the first point of contact is where the leading edge of the mounting shaft, i.e. the lower sealing section, enters through the circumferential shelf in the pipette tip and contacts the sealing ring. As the mounting shaft is further depressed into the pipette tip bore, sealing ring interference increases simultaneously as the ramp area of the lobes of the mounting shaft engages the locking ring on the tip collar to distort the upper portion of the collar our of round. As mentioned, while the overall insertion force is relatively light and ergonomic, the force increases noticeably and provides tactile feedback to the user that the tip is almost fully mounted. This increase in insertion force continues until the stop member on the mounting shaft engages the circumferential shelf on the pipette tip to abruptly stop further movement of the mounting shaft into the tip, at which point the lobes also snap engage under the locking ring in the collar bore. Thus alerting the user not to use additional, excessive force to mount the tip. These interrelated mounting conditions result in a secure stable mount with consistent sealing at the sealing ring. Alternatively, the initial engagement of the sealing ring can be staggered with respect to the engagement of the locking ring in order to lessen insertion force.
Moreover, the tip requires relatively low ejection force. When the pipette stripper sleeve pushes against the upper end of the tip collar, a relatively small ejection force is required to release the locking ring on the collar from the locking lobes on the mounting shaft. The flexing of the collar in its distorted shape when it is locked over the mounting shaft lobes stores energy. When the tip is released from the lobes, the combination of the pressure from the stripper and the release of the stored energy throw the tip from the mounting shaft, thereby facilitating convenient ejection of the tips from the mounting shaft after use.
In another aspect, the invention relates to the configuration of a disposable pipette tip in which a sealing area with a sealing ring is located below a circumferential shelf that separates and isolates the sealing area from the upper mounting collar. By moving the sealing function away from the collar or shelf area into the upper area of the barrel, the design limitations for the mounting configuration of the pipette tip collar is less restrictive. For example, in the cases of the preferred embodiment of the invention, the collar is flexed and distorted out of round when mounted on the mounting shaft. Locating the sealing area on the pipette tip below the circumferential shelf to isolate the sealing area from distortion facilitates this mounting arrangement.
These and other aspects, features and advantages of the invention are now described in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
While the invention is shown and described with respect to its use on a handheld, electronic air displacement pipette 10, the invention is also useful in connection with other types of handheld pipettes, as well as automated liquid handling machines using dispensable pipette tips. For example, the ergonomic features provided by the invention are particularly useful for handheld manual pipettes as well as electronic pipettes. In addition, features of the invention that relate to the security and stability of the engagement of the pipette tip to the mounting shaft are quite useful for automated liquid handling systems as well as handheld pipettes.
As shown in
Referring now to
The internal surface of the pipette tip 14 is now described in more detail, referring in particular to
The inside surface of the collar 36 is preferably tapered or slightly frustoconical, but can also be cylindrical in accordance with the invention. Preferably, the taper is between 0° and 10°. In any event, horizontal cross-sections through the main section of the collar 36 are preferably circular.
The upper portion 39 of the barrel 38 is the sealing area for the pipette tip 14. A circumferential sealing ring 54 preferably extends inward from the inner surface of the upper portion 39 of the barrel 38 in the sealing area. Alternatively, sealing can be accomplished without sealing ring 54. The sealing area 39 in the barrel 38 is preferably frustoconical, but can also be substantially cylindrical, in accordance with the invention. The preferred taper is between ½° and 4°. Preferably, the sealing ring 54 extends 0.003 inches inward from the surface of the barrel 38, and its longitudinal thickness is 0.010 inches.
The circumferential shelf 40 of the pipette tip 14 connects the lower portion of the collar 36 to the upper portion 39 of the barrel 38. The shelf 40, as shown in the Figures, is angular and continuous around the inside circumference of the tip 14. The shelf 40 need not be angular, however, and can for example be horizontal. The shelf 40 serves to separate the locking region or collar 36 of the pipette tip 14 from the sealing area 39 of the pipette 14 in the upper portion of the barrel 38. As best illustrated in
It is contemplated that pipette tips 14 manufactured in accordance with the invention will be typically made of molded plastic, normally polyethylene or polypropylene with or without various additives, as is known in the art. This design embodies a locking ring 48 and sealing ring 54 that help the injection molding process. They serve as a way to keep the molded tip on the core of the mold instead of using a puller ring for this process.
Referring now in particular to
The mounting shaft 12 is preferably made from machined steel or machined or molded from chemically resistant plastic such as PEEK, and the specific dimensions are selected to correspond to the dimensions of the matching pipette tip 14. For example, the distance between the stop member 34 and the catch surfaces 62 of the lobes 50 of the mounting shaft 12 is selected to correspond to the distance between the circumferential shelf 40 and the locking ring 48 on the collar 36 of the pipette tip 14.
Referring now to
Referring now to
By flexing and distorting the tip collar 36 rather than stretching the collar 36 in order to mount the tip 14, the required insertion force is relatively small as compared to other designs which require tight interference fits or stretching of the tip collar. The user senses that full engagement is near as the mounting shaft 12 is inserted into the tip 14 because of the slightly increasing resistance of the interference with the sealing ring 54 on the tip and the increasing diameter of the ramp lobes 50. Definite feedback of full engagement occurs when the stop member 34 engages the circumferential shelf 40 and the locking ring 48 snaps over the lobes 50. The locking engagement is robust and reduces unintentional dismounting of the tip when a side force is applied to the tip, such as during touching-off procedures.
In addition, the system enables low ejection forces, which is particularly advantageous for handheld pipettes. As mentioned, the out of round distortion of the collar 36 storing energy in the mounted collar 36 is useful for throwing off the tips 14 after use. Conventional ejection or stripping mechanisms can be used to push on the top of the collar 36 and push the locking ring 48 over the lobes 50 in order to eject the tips 14.
A preferred embodiment of the invention has been described in connection with the drawings, however, various aspects and features of the invention can be implemented in other forms. For example, it is not necessary that the mounting shaft 12 have more than two lobes. Moreover, as previously mentioned, while the preferred embodiment of the invention provides for low insertion and ejection forces as well as tactile feedback when the mounting shaft is inserted into the pipette tip, the invention is also quite useful in automated liquid handling systems where these attributes may not be as important.
Also, although not preferred, it may be desirable to move the sealing area on the pipette tip from below the shelf to above the shelf, and configure the mounting shaft so that it accommodates sealing above the stop, rather than below. Even thought this is not a preferred design, such a design preferably, in accordance with the invention, includes a mounting shaft with locking lobes as described above. The sealing area on the tip, however, still has to be sufficiently isolated from distortion. This normally requires that the sealing area be located adjacent the shelf and relatively far from the upper portion of the collar that becomes distorted by the mounting shaft lobes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4072330 | Brysch | Feb 1978 | A |
4721680 | Jeffs et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4748859 | Magnussen, Jr. et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4824641 | Williams | Apr 1989 | A |
4917274 | Asa et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4961350 | Tennstedt | Oct 1990 | A |
4999164 | Puchinger et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5032343 | Jeffs et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5200151 | Long | Apr 1993 | A |
5232669 | Pardinas | Aug 1993 | A |
5306510 | Meltzer | Apr 1994 | A |
5580529 | DeVaughn et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5736105 | Astle | Apr 1998 | A |
5948359 | Kalra et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6168761 | Kelly et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171553 | Petrek | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6197259 | Kelly et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6248295 | Petrek | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6582664 | Bevirt et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6596240 | Taggart et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6737023 | Kelly et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6745636 | Rainin et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6780381 | Yiu | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6967004 | Rainin et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6973845 | Bell | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6977062 | Cronenberg | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7033543 | Panzer et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7335337 | Smith | Feb 2008 | B1 |
20010043885 | Wanner | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020094302 | Taggart et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020146353 | Bevirt et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030082078 | Rainin et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030165408 | Takeda et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030219359 | Lenz et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040071602 | Yiu | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050069460 | Lohn | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050175511 | Cote et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050255005 | Motadel | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265900 | Gard et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060171851 | Motadel | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060177352 | Ziegmann et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060233669 | Panzer et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102 29 788 | Jan 2004 | DE |
0 148 333 | Sep 1989 | EP |
0 494 735 | Jul 1992 | EP |
1 319 437 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1 862 219 | Dec 2007 | EP |
0027530 | May 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080095671 A1 | Apr 2008 | US |