1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to internal bone fracture fixation devices. In one application, the present invention relates to bone fracture fixation devices and methods adapted for fixation, among other fractures, of femoral neck and other proximal femoral fractures.
2. Description of the Related Art
The femur, otherwise known as the thigh bone, generally comprises an elongate shaft extending from the hip to the knee. The proximal end of the shaft includes a head, a neck, a greater trochanter and a lesser trochanter. The head of the femur fits into the acetabular cup of the hip bone to form a ball and socket joint at the hip. The distal end of the femur includes a medial condyle and a lateral condyle. The condyles engage an upper end of the tibia to form the knee joint. Overall, the femur is the longest and strongest bone in the skeleton. However, portions of the femur are extremely susceptible to fracturing.
Pertrochanteric fractures among geriatric patients are the most frequent in connection with those of the region of the neck of the bone. The advanced age and the pathologies which are encountered in these patients make a timely stabilization of skeletal injuries necessary in order to reduce to a minimum the bed confinement and the rehabilitation times. Preferably, devices and procedures are utilized which minimize complications brought about by the so-called immobilization syndrome, which may be lethal for patients in delicate metabolical circumstances. It is also preferable to reduce to a minimum blood losses related to surgical intervention. At the same time, the syntheses means utilized must be stable in order to allow the patient to very timely assume a seated position and, two or three days following the intervention, to reassume an erect posture with progressive bearing of weight.
Internal fixation of femoral fractures in general is one of the most common orthopedic surgical procedures. Fractures of the femur occur in both the proximal portion of the femur and the distal portion of the femur. Fractures of the proximal portion of the femur (hip fractures) are generally classified as femoral neck fractures (capital or sub-capital), intertrochanteric fractures and subtrochanteric fractures. Fractures of the distal portion of the femur (knee fractures) are referred to as supracondylar fractures. Supracondylar fractures generally extend vertically between the condyles at the lower end of the femur to separate the distal portion of the femur into two main bone fragments. A fracture line may be further comminuted to create a plurality of smaller bone fragments. Fractures of the femur which extend into the neck of the bone are generally more difficult to treat than fractures restricted to the shaft of the femur.
Operative treatment of the fractures requires that the fractures be internally fixed and possibly compressed. Fractures of the neck, head or trochanters of the femur have been treated with a variety of compression screw assemblies which include generally a compression plate having a barrel member, a lag screw and a compressing screw. The compression plate is secured to the exterior of the femur and the barrel member is inserted into a predrilled hole in the direction of the femoral head. The lag screw which has a threaded end and a smooth portion is inserted through the barrel member so that it extends across the break and into the femoral head. The threaded portion engages the femoral head. The compressing screw connects the lag screw to the plate. By adjusting the tension of the compressing screw the compression (reduction) of the fracture can be adjusted.
A variety of elongated implants (nail, screw, pin, etc.) have been developed, which are adapted to be positioned along the longitudinal axis of the femoral neck with a leading (distal) end portion in the femoral head so as to stabilize a fracture of the femoral neck. The elongated implant may be implanted by itself or connected to another implant such as a side plate or intramedullary rod. The leading end portion of the implant typically includes means to positively grip the femoral head bone (external threads, expanding arms, etc.), but the inclusion of such gripping means can introduce several significant problems. First, implants with sharp edges on the leading end portion, such as the externally threaded implants, exhibit a tendency to migrate proximally towards the hip joint weight bearing surface after implantation. This can occur when the proximal cortical bone has insufficient integrity to resist distal movement of the screw head. Such proximal migration under physiological loading, which is also referred to as femoral head cut-out, can lead to significant damage to the adjacent hip joint. Also, the externally threaded implants can generate large stress concentrations in the bone during implantation which can lead to stripping of the threads formed in the bone and thus a weakened grip. The movable arms of known expanding arm devices are usually free at one end and attached at the other end to the main body of the leading end portion of the implant. As a result, all fatigue loading is concentrated at the attached ends of the arms and undesirably large bending moments are realized at the points of attachment. In addition, conventional threaded implants generally exhibit insufficient holding power under tension, such that the threads can be stripped out of the femoral head either by overtightening during the implantation procedure or during post operative loading by the patient's weight.
Thus, notwithstanding the variety of efforts in the prior art, there remains a need for an orthopedic fixation device with improved locking force such as within the femoral head in a femoral neck application, which resists migration and rotation, and which can be easily and rapidly deployed within the bone.
It is often desirable to insert a plurality of implants into the bone to stabilize a fracture. For example, triangulation of implants (i.e., arranging the implants in a triangular pattern) is a particularly effective way of treating proximal fractures of the femur (i.e., capital, sub-capital, and intertrochanteric fractures). Applicant has recognized that it would be advantageous to have a common device, which preferably could be used to couple the implants together while also securing the implant within the bone. Such a device would preferably simplify the procedure of installing the plurality of implants by providing a predetermined spatial and/or angular relationship between the implants, while increasing overall stability and resistance to failure.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a femoral neck fracture fixation system comprises a plurality of elongated bodies. Each elongated body has a proximal end and a distal end. A distal anchor is provided on the distal end of each of the elongated bodies. A first retention structure is provide on each of the elongated bodies, proximal to the distal anchor. The system also includes a plate with a plurality of openings. The openings are configured such that the plate can be moveably carried by the plurality elongated bodies. The plate is movable in the distal direction with respect to the elongated bodies and the retention structure resists proximal movement of the plate with respect the elongated bodies.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention a bone fracture fixation system comprises a plurality of elongated bodies, each having a proximal end and a distal end. A cancellous bone anchor is provided on the distal end the elongated bodies. The device also includes a plate having at least two openings and that is axially movably carried on the elongated bodies. Complimentary surface structures are provided in between the elongated bodies and the plate. The complimentary surface structures permit advancing the plate in the distal direction to tighten the fixation device but resist axial proximal movement of the plate with respect to the elongated bodies.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the invention, a method for treating a femoral fracture comprises drilling a plurality of bores distally into the femur in the direction of a fracture, advancing a fixation device into each of the bores, rotating each of the fixation devices to engage bone distal to the fracture, and advancing a plate with a plurality of openings distally along the fixation devices to compress the fracture.
In accordance with still yet another aspect of the invention, a method of securing a first bone fragment to a second bone fragment comprises drilling a plurality of bores through the first bone fragment in the direction of the second bone fragment, advancing a fixation device through each of the bores, rotating at least a first portion of each of the fixation devices to secure the fixation devices to the second fragment, and axially advancing a plate with a plurality of openings over at least a second portion of each of the fixation devices to engage the first fragment.
Further features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those of skill in the art in view of the detailed description of preferred embodiments which follows, when considered together with the attached drawings and claims.
Although the fixation devices of the present invention will be disclosed primarily in the context of fractures of the proximal femur, the methods and structures disclosed herein are intended for application in any of a wide variety of bones and fractures, as will be apparent to those of skill in the art in view of the disclosure herein. In general, the present invention is most beneficial in an application in which it is desired to repeatably maintain a predetermined spatial and/or angular relationship between two or more bone anchors or pins.
Potential applications include, for example, a wide variety of fractures and osteotomies in the hand, such as interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal arthrodesis, transverse phalangeal and metacarpal fracture fixation, spiral phalangeal and metacarpal fracture fixation, oblique phalangeal and metacarpal fracture fixation, intercondylar phalangeal and metacarpal fracture fixation, phalangeal and metacarpal osteotomy fixation as well as others known in the art. A wide variety of phalangeal and metatarsal osteotomies and fractures of the foot may also be stabilized using the bone fixation device of the present invention. These include, among others, distal metaphyseal osteotomies such as those described by Austin and Reverdin-Laird, base wedge osteotomies, oblique diaphyseal, digital arthrodesis as well as a wide variety of others that will be known to those of skill in the art. The bone fixation device may be used with or without plate(s) or washer(s), all of which can be either permanent, absorbable, or combinations.
Fractures of the fibular and tibial malleoli, pilon fractures and other fractures of the bones of the leg may be fixated and stabilized with the present invention with or without the use of plates, both absorbable or non-absorbing types, and with alternate embodiments of the current invention. Fractures and osteotomies of the mid and hind foot, tarsal arthrodesis and osteotomy, or others as are known to those with skill in the art. One example is the fixation of the medial malleolar avulsion fragment fixation.
The fixation device of the present invention may also be used to attach tissue or structure to the bone, such as in ligament reattachment and other soft tissue attachment procedures. Plates and washers, with or without tissue spikes for soft tissue attachment, and other implants may also be attached to bone, using either resorbable or nonresorbable fixation devices depending upon the implant and procedure. The fixation device may also be used to attach sutures to the bone, such as in any of a variety of tissue suspension procedures.
For example, peripheral applications for the fixation devices include utilization of the device for fastening soft tissue such as capsule, tendon or ligament to bone. It may also be used to attach a synthetic material such as marlex mesh, to bone or allograft material such as tensor fascia lata, to bone. In the process of doing so, retention of the material to bone may be accomplished with the collar as shown, or the pin and or collar may be modified to accept a suture or other material for facilitation of this attachment.
Specific examples include attachment of the posterior tibial tendon to the navicular bone in the Kidner operation. This application may be accomplished using an appropriately sized implant of the present invention along with a washer with distally extending soft tissue spikes. Navicular-cuneiform arthrodesis may be performed utilizing the device and concurrent attachment of the tendon may be accomplished. Attachment of the tendon may be accomplished in the absence of arthrodesis by altering the placement of the implant in the adjacent bone.
Ligament or capsule reattachment after rupture, avulsion or detachment, such as in the ankle, shoulder or knee can also be accomplished using the devices disclosed herein.
The fixation devices can also be used to aid bone fusion between adjacent bones, bone fragments or any of a variety of articulating joints, such as, for example, a first and a second adjacent vertebral bodies of the spine.
The fixation devices may be used in combination with semi tubular, one-third tubular and dynamic compression plates, both of metallic and absorbable composition, if the collar is modified to match the opening on the plate.
The cannulated design disclosed below can be fashioned to accept an antibiotic impregnated rod for the slow adsorption of medication locally. This may be beneficial for prophylaxis, especially in open wounds, or when osteomyelitis is present and stabilization of fracture fragments is indicated.
A kit may be assembled for field use by military or sport medical or paramedical personnel. This kit contains an implanting tool, and a variety of implant device size and types. The kit may include additional components such as sterilization or disinfectant materials, a skin stapler, bandages, gloves, and basic tools for emergent wound and fracture treatment. Antibiotic rods may be included for wound prophylaxis during transport.
The greater trochanter 18 extends outwardly above the junction of the neck 16 and the body 17 of the femur 10. On the medial side of the greater trochanter 18 is the trochanteric fossa 20. This depression accommodates the insertion of the obturator externus muscle. The lesser trochanter 21 is located posteromedially at the junction of the neck 16 and the body 17 of the femur 10. Both the greater trochanter 18 and the lesser trochanter 21 serve for the attachment of muscles. On the posterior surface of the femur 10 at about the same axial level as the lesser trochanter 21 is the gluteal tuberosity 22, for the insertion of the gluteus maximus muscle. Additional details of the femur are well understood in the art and not discussed in further detail herein.
As mentioned above, for some applications it is desirable to insert a plurality of fixation devices into the femur 10. It also may be desirable to ensure that the plurality of fixation devices are positioned at predetermined locations and/or angles with respect to each other. For example, the use of three bone fixation devices arranged in a triangular pattern is an effective way of treating proximal fractures of the femur (e.g., capital, sub-capital and intertrochanteric fractures). Such arrangements are particularly useful if the clinician determines, that based upon the nature of the fracture 24, there is a possibility that the head 14 of the femur 10 could rotate about a single fixation pin 12. Even minor rotation can inhibit the healing of the fracture and significant rotation can result in failure of the fixation device or necrosis of the femoral head.
As such, in the illustrated embodiment, the fixation system 11 includes three fixation pins 12 (the third pin 12 is not illustrated in
In one embodiment, the body 28 comprises titanium. However, as will be described in more detail below, other metals or bioabsorbable or nonabsorbable polymeric materials may be utilized, depending upon the dimensions and desired structural integrity of the finished fixation device 12.
The distal end 32 of the body 28 is provided with a cancellous bone anchor or distal cortical bone anchor 34. Additional details of the distal bone anchor are described below. In general, in a femoral neck application, distal bone anchor 34 is adapted to be rotationally inserted into the cancellous bone within the head 14 of the femur 10, to retain the fixation device 12 within the femoral head.
The proximal end 30 of the fixation pin 12 extends through the locking plate 26. The locking plate 26 is axially moveable in a distal direction along the body 28, to permit compression of the fracture 24 as will be apparent from
Referring to
As illustrated in
In one embodiment of the fixation device 12, the retention structure 42 comprise a plurality of threads, adapted to cooperate with the retention structures 40 on the locking plate 26, which may be a complementary plurality of threads. In this embodiment, the body 28 is distally advanced with respect to the locking plate 26 by rotation of the body 28 with respect to the locking plate 26. The body 28 may be advantageously removed from the locking plate 26 by reverse rotation, to permit removal of the body 28 from the patient. In this embodiment, the proximal end 30 of the body 28 is preferably provided with a rotational coupling 48 to permit a removal tool to rotate the body 28 with respect to the locking plate. Any of a variety of driving devices may be utilized, such as electric drills or hand tools which allow the clinician to manually rotate the cancellous bone anchor 34 into the head of the femur. Thus, the rotational coupling 48 may have any of a variety of cross sectional configurations, such as one or more flats or splines.
In one embodiment, the rotational coupling 48 comprises a proximal projection of the body 28 having a polygonal cross section, such as a hexagonal cross section. The rotational coupling 48 is illustrated as a male component, machined or milled or attached to the proximal end 30 of the body 28. However, the rotational coupling may also be in the form of a female element, such as a hexagonal or other noncircular cross sectioned lumen extending throughout a proximal portion or the entire length of the body 28. Although illustrated as solid throughout, the body 28 may be cannulated to accommodate installation over a placement wire as is understood in the art. The cross section of the central cannulation can be made non circular, e.g., hexagonal, to accommodate a corresponding male tool for installation or removal of the device regardless of the location of the proximal break point, as will be discussed.
In another embodiment, the body 28 is distally advanced with respect to the locking plate 26 without rotation of the body 28 with respect to the locking plate 26. In such an embodiment, any of a variety of complementary surface structures which permit one way ratchet like movement may be utilized, such as a plurality of annular rings or helical threads, ramped ratchet structures and the like for cooperating with an opposing ramped structure or pawl. Examples of such structures are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/990,587, filed Nov. 19, 2001, entitled “PROXIMAL ANCHORS FOR BONE FIXATION SYSTEM”, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein. In some of these embodiments, an anti-rotation lock may be provided between the fixation device 12 and the locking plate 26, such as a spline or other interfit structure in the housing 38 to prevent relative rotation of the fixation device 12 following implantation.
In a modified embodiment, the surface structures 40 and complementary surface structures 42 may be toleranced to permit distal axial advancement onto the body 26 without rotation, but require rotation with respect to the locking plate 26 in order to remove the body 28.
Thus, the bone fixation system 11 can provide compression across a fracture throughout a range of motion following the placement of the distal anchor 34. The distal anchor 34 may be positioned within the cancellous and/or distal cortical bone, and the locking plate 26 may be distally advanced throughout a range to provide compression across the fracture without needing to relocate the distal anchor 34.
In many applications, the working range is at least about 10% of the overall length of the device, and may be as much as 20% or 30% or more of the overall device length. In the context of a femoral application, working ranges of up to about 10 mm may be provided, since estimates within that range can normally be readily accomplished within the clinical setting. In other applications, such as a metatarsal fracture, a working range in the area of from about 1 mm to about 2 mm may be all that is necessary. The embodiments disclosed herein can be scaled to have a greater or a lesser working range, as will be apparent to those of skill in the art in view of the disclosure herein.
With reference back to
The body 28 may also be provided with at least one and preferably two or three or more graduation markings axially spaced along the proximal portion of the body 28. Such graduation markings can be used to indicate how far the body 28 has been inserted into the bone. Such graduation markings may include indicia indicating the distance (e.g., in millimeters or inches) from the proximal surface of the bone to the distal tip of the distal bone anchor 34.
The distal anchor 34 comprises a helical locking structure 60 for engaging cancellous and/or distal cortical bone. In the illustrated embodiment, the locking structure 60 comprises a flange that is be wrapped around a central core 62 or an axial lumen, as discussed below. The central core 62 or axial lumen defines a minor diameter of the helical locking structure 60. In a similar manner, the outer edge of the helical flange 60 defines a major diameter or outer boundary of the helical locking structure 60. The flange extends through at least one and generally from about two to about 50 or more full revolutions depending upon the axial length of the distal anchor and intended application. For most femoral neck fixation devices, the flange will generally complete from about 2 to about 20 revolutions. The helical flange 60 is preferably provided with a pitch and an axial spacing to optimize the retention force within cancellous bone, to optimize compression of the fracture.
The helical flange 60 of the embodiment illustrated in
The distal end 32 and/or the outer edges of the helical flange 60 may be atraumatic (e.g., blunt or soft). This inhibits the tendency of the fixation device 12 to migrate anatomically proximally towards the hip joint bearing surface after implantation (i.e., femoral head cut-out). Distal migration is also inhibited by the dimensions and presence of the proximal anchor 36, which has a larger footprint than conventional screws.
Referring to
Additional configurations of the distal anchor are described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/012,687, filed Nov. 13, 2001, entitled “DISTAL BONE ANCHORS FOR BONE FIXATION WITH SECONDARY COMPRESSION”, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
With reference to
In the illustrated embodiment, the locking plate 26 has a generally triangular shape so as to provide a generally uniform border around the openings 37 while generally minimizing the size of the locking plate. However, it should be appreciated that the locking plate can be formed into a variety of other shapes. The locking plate preferably has beveled edges 80 as best seen in
In the embodiment illustrated in
The clinician can be provided an array of locking plates 26 of varying angular relationships between the bone contacting surface 84 and the longitudinal axis of the body 28 and housing 38 (e.g., 90°, 100°, 110°, 120°, and 130°). A single body 28 can be associated with the array such as in a single sterile package. The clinician upon identifying the entrance angle of the body 28 and the associated entrance point surface orientation of the femur 10 can choose the locking plate 26 from the array with the best fit angular relationship, for use with the body 28.
In the illustrated embodiments, the locking late 26 is arranged such that the angular relationship between the bone contacting 84 surface and the longitudinal axis of the housing 38 of two or more of the bodies 28 are parallel to each other. However, in a modified embodiment, two or more the angular relationships between bodies 28 may deviate from parallel. For example, in one embodiment, the locking plate is configured such that longitudinal axis of two or more housings 38 are not parallel to each other and are within a range of approximately 0 to 60 degrees with respect to each other.
In accordance with an optional feature, illustrated in
In use, the clinician first identifies a patient having a fracture to be treated, such as a femoral neck fracture, which is fixable by an internal fixation system. The clinician accesses the proximal femur, reduces the fracture if necessary and selects a bone drill and drills a plurality of holes 90 in accordance with conventional techniques. In the example of a femoral neck fracture, three holes and fixation devices will often be used as has been discussed. Preferably, the hole 90 has a diameter within the range from about 3 mm to about 8 mm. This diameter may be slightly larger than the diameter of the distal anchor 34. The hole 90 preferably extends up to or slightly beyond the fracture 24.
A fixation pin 12 having an axial length and outside diameter suitable for the hole 90 is selected. The distal end 32 of the fixation pin 12 is advanced distally into the hole 90 until the distal anchor 34 reaches the distal end of the hole 90. The locking plate 26 may be carried by the fixation pin 12 prior to advancing the body 28 into the hole 90, or may be attached following placement of one or more of the bodies 28 within the holes 90. Once the body 28 is in place, the clinician may use any of a variety of driving devices, such as electric drills or hand tools to rotate the cancellous bone anchor 34 into the head of the femur. In one embodiment, the elongated bodies are rotated sequentially or simultaneously into position across the fracture 24 or separation between adjacent bones and into the adjacent bone or bone fragment. The locking plate 26 is then distally advanced by applying proximal traction to the proximal end 20 of the body 28 to apply secondary compression and lock the system 11 into place.
While proximal traction is applied to the proximal end 30 of body 28, such as by conventional hemostats, pliers or a calibrated loading device, the locking plate 26 is advanced distally until the locking plate 26 fits snugly against the outer surface of the femur or tissue adjacent the femur. Appropriate compression of the fixation system 11 across the fracture is accomplished by tactile feedback or through the use of a calibration device for applying a predetermined load on the implantation device. One advantage of the structure of the present invention is the ability to adjust compression independently of the setting of the distal anchor 34.
Following appropriate tensioning of the locking plate 26, the proximal extension 30 of the body 28 is preferably cut off, snapped off, unscrewed or otherwise removed. Body 28 may be cut using conventional saws, cutters or bone forceps which are routinely available in the clinical setting. Alternatively, the fixation device can be selected such that it is sized to length upon tensioning, so that no proximal projection remains.
Following removal of the proximal end 30 of body 28, the access site may be closed and dressed in accordance with conventional wound closure techniques.
Preferably, the clinician will have access to an array of fixation systems 11, having, for example, different diameters, axial lengths, angular and spatial relationships. These may be packaged one per package in sterile envelopes or peelable pouches, or in dispensing cartridges which may each hold a plurality of systems 11. Upon encountering a fracture for which the use of a fixation device is deemed appropriate, the clinician will assess the dimensions and load requirements, and select a fixation system from the array which meets the desired specifications.
With reference now to
The side plate 92 may also inhibit proximal movement of the locking plate 26 with respect to the bone. This allows the bone fixation system 11 to capture “secondary compression” of the fracture. That is, the bone fixation system 11 can be used to provide an initial compression across the fracture when the locking plate 26 is appropriately tensioned. However, as the patient applies weight or stress to the bone post procedure, the fracture typically undergoes secondary compression, which further compresses the fracture. During such secondary compression, the side plate 92 prevents proximal movement of the locking plate 26 with respect to the bone. The ratchet-type structures 40, 42 of the locking plate 26 and the body 28 allow the locking plate 26 to move distally along the body 28. Thus, any slack caused by the secondary compression is taken up by the locking plate as the retention structures 40, 42 prevent proximal movement of the locking plate 26 with respect to the body 28. This system 11 is therefore self tightening after it has been implanted in the patient.
In a modified arrangement, the second portion 112 can comprise any of a variety of tensioning elements for permitting proximal tension to be placed on the distal anchor 34 while the proximal anchor is advanced distally to compress the fracture. For example, any of a variety of tubes or wires can be removably attached to the first portion 110 and extend proximally to a proximal handpiece. In one such arrangement, the first portion 110 can include a releasable connector in the form of a latching element, such as an eye or hook. The second portion 110 can include a complementary releasable connector (e.g., a complementary hook) for engaging the first portion 100. In this manner, the second portion 112 can be detachably coupled to the first portion 10 such proximal traction can be applied to the first portion 110 through the second portion. Alternatively, the second portion 112 may be provided with an eye or hook, or transverse bar, around which or through which a suture or wire may be advanced, both ends of which are retained at the proximal end of the device. Following proximal tension on the tensioning element during the compression step, one end of the suture or wire is released, and the other end may be pulled free of the device. Alternate releasable proximal tensioning structures may be devised by those of skill in the art in view of the disclosure herein. Additional configurations of the body 28′ can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/991,367, filed on Nov. 13, 2001, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR BONE FIXATION WITH SECONDARY COMPRESSION”, which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference herein.
Following appropriate tensioning of the fixation device 12, the second portion 112 of the body 28′ is preferably detached from the first portion 112 and removed. In the illustrated embodiment, this involves rotating the second portion 112 with respect to the first portion 110.
The two-piece body 28′ described above may be used with a modified locking plate 120, which is illustrated in
The fixation systems of the present invention and their various components (e.g., fixation pins, 12, locking plates 26 and locking cover caps 98) may be made from either conventional bioabsorbable materials or conventional non-absorbable materials, combinations thereof and equivalents thereof. In addition, natural materials such as allografts may be used. Examples of absorbable materials include homopolymers and copolymers of lactide, glycolide, trimethylene carbonate, caprolactone, and p-dioxanone and blends thereof. The following two blends may be useful:
(1) the blend of poly(p-dioxanone) and a lactide/glycolide copolymer, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,646,741 which is incorporated by reference.
(2) the glycolide-rich blend of two or more polymers, one polymer being a high lactide content polymer, and the other being a high glycolide content disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,889,119 which is incorporated by reference.
Additional bioabsorbable materials are disclosed in copending application Ser. No. 09/558,057 filed Apr. 26, 2000, the disclosure of which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.
The fixation devices and plates may also be made from conventional non-absorbable, biocompatible materials including stainless steel, titanium, alloys thereof, polymers, composites and the like and equivalents thereof. In one embodiment, the distal anchor comprises a metal helix, while the body and the proximal anchor comprise a bioabsorbable material. Alternatively, the distal anchor comprises a bioabsorbable material, and the body and proximal anchor comprise either a bioabsorbable material or a non-absorbable material. As a further alternative, each of the distal anchor and the body comprise a non-absorbable material, connected by an absorbable link. This may be accomplished by providing a concentric fit between the distal anchor and the body, with a transverse absorbable pin extending therethrough. This embodiment will enable removal of the body following dissipation of the pin, while leaving the distal anchor within the bone.
The components of the invention (or a polymeric coating layer on part or all of the anchor surface), may contain one or more bioactive substances, such as antibiotics, chemotherapeutic substances, angiogenic growth factors, substances for accelerating the healing of the wound, growth hormones, antithrombogenic agents, bone growth accelerators or agents, and the like. Such bioactive implants may be desirable because they contribute to the healing of the injury in addition to providing mechanical support.
In addition, the components may be provided with any of a variety of structural modifications to accomplish various objectives, such as osteoincorporation, or more rapid or uniform absorption into the body. For example, osteoincorporation may be enhanced by providing a micropitted or otherwise textured surface on the components. Alternatively, capillary pathways may be provided throughout the body and collar, such as by manufacturing the anchor and body from an open cell foam material, which produces tortuous pathways through the device. This construction increases the surface area of the device which is exposed to body fluids, thereby generally increasing the absorption rate in a bioabsorbable construction. Capillary pathways may alternatively be provided by laser drilling or other technique, which will be understood by those of skill in the art in view of the disclosure herein. In general, the extent to which the anchor can be permeated by capillary pathways or open cell foam passageways may be determined by balancing the desired structural integrity of the device with the desired reabsorption time, taking into account the particular strength and absorption characteristics of the desired polymer.
One open cell bioabsorbable material is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,005,161 as a poly(hydroxy) acid in the form of an interconnecting, open-cell meshwork which duplicates the architecture of human cancellous bone from the iliac crest and possesses physical property (strength) values in excess of those demonstrated by human (mammalian) iliac crest cancellous bone. The gross structure is said to maintain physical property values at least equal to those of human, iliac crest, cancellous bone for a minimum of 90 days following implantation. The disclosure of U.S. Pat. No. 6,005,161 is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.
The components of the present invention may be sterilized by any of the well known sterilization techniques, depending on the type of material. Suitable sterilization techniques include heat sterilization, radiation sterilization, such as cobalt 60 irradiation or electron beams, ethylene oxide sterilization, and the like.
The specific dimensions of any of the bone fixation devices of the present invention can be readily varied depending upon the intended application, as will be apparent to those of skill in the art in view of the disclosure herein. Moreover, although the present invention has been described in terms of certain preferred embodiments, other embodiments of the invention including variations in dimensions, configuration and materials will be apparent to those of skill in the art in view of the disclosure herein. In addition, all features discussed in connection with any one embodiment herein can be readily adapted for use in other embodiments herein. The use of different terms or reference numerals for similar features in different embodiments does not imply differences other than those which may be expressly set forth. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to be described solely by reference to the appended claims, and not limited to the preferred embodiments disclosed herein.
This application claims the priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of Provisional Application 60/440,765, filed Jan. 16, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1802560 | Kerwin | Apr 1931 | A |
2077804 | Morrison | Apr 1937 | A |
2121193 | Hanicke | Jun 1938 | A |
2485531 | Dzus et al. | Oct 1949 | A |
2489870 | Dzus | Oct 1949 | A |
3115804 | Johnson | Dec 1963 | A |
3489143 | Holloran | Jan 1970 | A |
4052988 | Doddi et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4175555 | Herbert | Nov 1979 | A |
4262665 | Roalstad et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4275717 | Bolesky | Jun 1981 | A |
4463753 | Gustilo | Aug 1984 | A |
4537185 | Stednitz | Aug 1985 | A |
4632101 | Freedland | Dec 1986 | A |
4640271 | Lower | Feb 1987 | A |
4667663 | Miyata | May 1987 | A |
4688561 | Reese | Aug 1987 | A |
4721103 | Freedland | Jan 1988 | A |
4743257 | Tormala et al. | May 1988 | A |
4790304 | Rosenberg | Dec 1988 | A |
4796612 | Reese | Jan 1989 | A |
4815909 | Simons | Mar 1989 | A |
4827917 | Brumfield | May 1989 | A |
4858601 | Glisson | Aug 1989 | A |
4873976 | Schreiber | Oct 1989 | A |
4898186 | Ikada et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4903692 | Reese | Feb 1990 | A |
4917554 | Bronn | Apr 1990 | A |
4940467 | Tronzo | Jul 1990 | A |
4959064 | Engelhardt | Sep 1990 | A |
4968317 | Tormala et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4978349 | Frigg | Dec 1990 | A |
4988351 | Paulos et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5013315 | Barrows | May 1991 | A |
5013316 | Goble et al. | May 1991 | A |
5059193 | Kuslich | Oct 1991 | A |
5062849 | Schelhas | Nov 1991 | A |
5092891 | Kummer et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5098433 | Freedland | Mar 1992 | A |
5098435 | Stednitz et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5122133 | Evans | Jun 1992 | A |
5122141 | Simpson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5167663 | Brumfield | Dec 1992 | A |
5167664 | Hodorek | Dec 1992 | A |
5217462 | Asnis et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5242447 | Borzone | Sep 1993 | A |
5246441 | Ross et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5250049 | Michael | Oct 1993 | A |
5300074 | Frigg | Apr 1994 | A |
5312410 | Miller et al. | May 1994 | A |
5334204 | Clewett et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5364398 | Chapman et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5370646 | Reese et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5370661 | Branch | Dec 1994 | A |
5382248 | Jacobson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5449359 | Groiso | Sep 1995 | A |
5449361 | Preissman | Sep 1995 | A |
5452748 | Simmons et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5470333 | Ray | Nov 1995 | A |
5498265 | Asnis et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5501695 | Anspach, Jr. et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5520690 | Errico et al. | May 1996 | A |
5536127 | Pennig | Jul 1996 | A |
5545164 | Howland | Aug 1996 | A |
5549610 | Russell et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
D374287 | Goble et al. | Oct 1996 | S |
5591168 | Judet et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5618142 | Sonden et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5618314 | Harwin et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626613 | Schmieding | May 1997 | A |
5628751 | Sander et al. | May 1997 | A |
5643320 | Lower et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5662683 | Kay | Sep 1997 | A |
5669915 | Caspar et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5713903 | Sander et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720753 | Sander et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725541 | Anspach, III et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728097 | Mathews | Mar 1998 | A |
5728116 | Rosenman | Mar 1998 | A |
5735853 | Olerud | Apr 1998 | A |
5741282 | Anspach, III et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5772662 | Chapman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5782865 | Grptz | Jul 1998 | A |
5849004 | Bramlet | Dec 1998 | A |
5871485 | Rao et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5893850 | Cachia | Apr 1999 | A |
5904696 | Rosenman | May 1999 | A |
5908422 | Bresina | Jun 1999 | A |
5928235 | Friedl | Jul 1999 | A |
5928244 | Tovey et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935129 | McDevitt et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5947999 | Groiso | Sep 1999 | A |
5948000 | Larsen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954722 | Bono | Sep 1999 | A |
5954747 | Clark | Sep 1999 | A |
5957924 | Tormala et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968044 | Nicholson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976139 | Bramlet | Nov 1999 | A |
5984927 | Wenstrom, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5984966 | Kiena et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989255 | Pepper et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993459 | Larsen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997538 | Asnis et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5997541 | Schenk | Dec 1999 | A |
6001100 | Sherman et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6001101 | Augagneur et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004327 | Asnis et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005161 | Brekke et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007566 | Wenstorm, Jr. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007580 | Lehto et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010513 | Tormala et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6015410 | Tormala et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6019762 | Cole | Feb 2000 | A |
6030162 | Huebner | Feb 2000 | A |
6036701 | Rosenman | Mar 2000 | A |
6068648 | Cole et al. | May 2000 | A |
6083244 | Lubbers et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6123711 | Winters | Sep 2000 | A |
6126661 | Faccioli et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6162234 | Freedland et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168595 | Durham et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183472 | Lutz | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6183474 | Bramlet et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6248108 | Tormala et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6306136 | Baccelli | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319254 | Giet et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6355043 | Adam | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361537 | Anderson | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371989 | Chauvin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6423061 | Bryant | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423067 | Eisermann | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6458134 | Songer et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468277 | Justin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468309 | Lieberman | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6491714 | Bennett | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506192 | Gertzman et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511481 | Von Hoffmann et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6517543 | Berrevoets et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527774 | Lieberman | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6544265 | Lieberman | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6547793 | McGuire | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551319 | Lieberman | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551322 | Lieberman | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558389 | Clark et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6579293 | Chandran | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582453 | Tran et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585730 | Foerster | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6585740 | Schlapfer | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6589249 | Sater et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6599297 | Carlsson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6635059 | Randall et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6692499 | Tormalaet et al | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6875215 | Taras et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6916323 | Kitchens | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6921403 | Cragg et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6945975 | Dalton | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6949100 | Venturini | Sep 2005 | B1 |
20020055740 | Lieberman | May 2002 | A1 |
20020143335 | Von Hoffman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1177918 | Apr 1998 | CN |
0525352 | Feb 1993 | EP |
1046376 | Apr 2000 | EP |
0853929 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1378205 | Jul 2003 | EP |
2699065 | Dec 1992 | FR |
2728778 | Dec 1994 | FR |
2745709 | Mar 1996 | FR |
2800601 | Nov 1999 | FR |
2801189 | Nov 1999 | FR |
2808182 | Apr 2000 | FR |
2157788 | Oct 1985 | GB |
2173565 | Oct 1986 | GB |
2173655 | Oct 1986 | GB |
64-52439 | Feb 1989 | JP |
WO 9109572 | Dec 1989 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040181222 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60440765 | Jan 2003 | US |