The present invention relates to thermoformed plastic hinged containers for food or other articles and, more specifically, a locking structure for holding the lid and base of such a container in closed condition.
Containers for food or other articles thermoformed from plastic material normally comprise a lid and base that may be hinged to each other or may be separate parts. In order to hold the lid and base of the container in closed condition, it is necessary that the lid and base have a locking structure that can be manually opened and closed with relative ease. However, the structure should be capable of locking the container in closed condition to avoid accidental opening.
Various types of locking structures have been proposed in the past. For example, cylindrical male and female locking elements have been proposed as disclosed in British Patent Specification 2,118,142. Elongated rib structures comprising cooperating male and female elements have been proposed as disclosed in Canadian Patent 1,117,491 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,046,659. In the prior elongated rib structure locking elements, the locking action has taken place on the long sides or the ends of the ribs. This requires that the ribs be located in such a position on the container that both sides or ends of the ribs are engageable by the cooperating male and female elements to provide the locking action.
It would be desirable to provide a locking structure with male and female locking elements where the elements contain hook structures that interlock with respect to each other when the container is in a closed condition. This would improve the strength of the locking structure and allow hand closure of it while still holding significant weight.
The primary object of the present invention is to provide a locking structure for a container that provides a tighter lock between the container lid and base.
Another object of the invention is to provide a locking structure for a container that is easy to operate in opening and closing the locking structure on the container.
In accordance with the present invention there is provided a container for food or other articles comprising a lid having a horizontal flange extending around the periphery thereof and a base having a horizontal flange extending around the periphery thereof adapted for engagement with the horizontal flange of the lid when the container is in closed condition. A locking structure is provided wherein the locking structure has male and female locking elements containing hook structures that interlock with respect to each other when the container is in a closed condition. The hook structures include at least one detent depending from the front of the lid, the detent having an inwardly extending lip disposed on its outer side and rounded ends, and at least one tab that is located in the front of the base and dimensioned to receive a cooperating detent in the lid. The tab has an upper surface that is angled toward a lower surface and two substantially flat end surfaces. The inwardly extending lip of the detent and the upper surface of the tab are constructed and arranged to deflect with respect to each other so that when the detent is pressed into the tab, the inwardly extending lip snaps into position beneath the upper surface and interlocks therewith to lock the lid securely to the base.
The lid is hinged to the rear of the base for movement towards and away from the base for opening and closing the container and the locking means is located at the front of the base. In addition, the lid includes a central dome structure extending upwardly from the horizontal flange extending around the periphery thereof and the base includes a central receptacle structure depending from the horizontal flange extending around the periphery thereof.
a is a cross-sectional view of the locking means showing the detent and the tab interlocked with each other.
Shown in
The container 2 shown in
When the lid 4 of the container 2 moves from the open condition in
Having described the presently preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention may be otherwise embodied within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3149747 | Burgess | Sep 1964 | A |
3511433 | Andrews et al. | May 1970 | A |
3565146 | Arnolds | Feb 1971 | A |
3786982 | Rakes et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
4576330 | Schepp | Mar 1986 | A |
5046659 | Warburton | Sep 1991 | A |
5169014 | Hexamer | Dec 1992 | A |
5515993 | McManus | May 1996 | A |
6644494 | Hayes et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
20040031795 | Galland et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050247709 | Atkins et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 602 694 | Nov 1981 | GB |
2 118 142 | Oct 1983 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060081641 A1 | Apr 2006 | US |