The invention is particularly suited for mechanical joining of thin floating floorboards, such as laminate and parquet flooring, and therefore the following description of prior art and the objects and features of the invention will be directed to this field of application, in particular rectangular floorboards that are joined on long sides as well as short sides. The features distinguishing the invention concern in the first place parts of the locking system which are related to horizontal locking transversely of the joint edges of the boards. In practice, floorboards will be manufactured according to the inventive principles of also having locking means for mutual vertical locking of the boards.
WO 94/26999 discloses a locking system for mechanical joining of building boards, especially floorboards. A mechanical locking system permits locking together of the boards both perpendicular to and in parallel with the principal plane of the boards on long sides as well as short sides. Methods for making such floorboards are described in SE 9604484-7 and SE 9604483-9. The principles of designing and laying the floorboards as well as the methods for making the same that are described in the above three documents are applicable also to the present invention, and therefore the contents of these documents are incorporated by reference in present description.
With a view to facilitating the understanding and description of the present invention as well as the understanding of the problems behind the invention, now follows with reference to
A floorboard 1 of known design is shown from below and from above in
Both the long sides 4a, 4b and the short sides 5a, 5b can be joined mechanically without any glue in the direction D2 in
For mechanical joining of both long sides and short sides also in the vertical direction (direction D1 in
a-1c show how two such boards 1, 1′ can be joined by downwards angling.
a-2c illustrate how also the short sides 5a and 5b of the boards 1, 1′ can be mechanically joined in both D1 and D2 direction by the new board 1′ being moved essentially horizontally towards the previously laid board 1. This can be carried out after the long side 4b of the new board 1′ has been joined as described above. In the first step in
For optimal function, it should be possible for the boards, after being joined, along their long sides to take a position where there is a possibility of a small play between the locking surface 10 and the locking groove 14. For a more detailed description of this play, reference is made to WO 94/26999.
In addition to the disclosure of the above-mentioned patent specifications, Norske Skog Flooring AS (licensee of Valinge Aluminum AB) introduced a laminate flooring with a mechanical joining system according to WO 94/29699 in January 1996 in connection with the Domotex fair in Hannover, Germany. This laminate flooring marketed under the trademark Alloc®, is 7.6 mm thick, has a 0.6 mm aluminum strip 6 which is mechanically fixed to the tongue side and the active locking surface 10 of the locking element 8 has an inclination of about 70°-80° to the plane of the board. The joint edges are impregnated with wax and the underside is provided with underlay board which is mounted at the factory. The vertical joint is designed as a modified tongue-and-groove joint. The strips 6, 6′ on long side and short side are largely identical, but slightly bent upwards to different degrees on long side and short side. The inclination of the active locking surface varies between long side and short side. The distance of the locking groove 14 from the joint edge, however, is somewhat smaller on the short side than on the long side. The boards are made with a nominal play on the long side which is about 0.05-0.10 mm. This enables displacement of the long sides and bridges width tolerances of the boards. Boards of this brand have been manufactured and sold with zero play on the short sides, which is possible since the short sides need not be displaced in connection with the locking which is effected by snap action. Boards of this brand have also been made with more beveled portions on the short side to facilitate snapping in according to
WO 97/47834 (Unilin) discloses a mechanical joining system which is essentially based on the above known principles. In the corresponding product which this applicant began to market in the latter part of 1997, biasing between the boards is strived for. This leads to high friction and difficulties in angling together and displacing the boards. This document also shows that the mechanical locking on the short side can be designed in a manner different from the long side. In the described embodiments, the strip is integrated with the body of the board, i.e. made in one piece with and of the same material as the body of the board.
Although the flooring according to WO 94/26999 and the flooring marketed under the trademark Alloc® have great advantages compared with traditional, glued floorings, further improvements are desirable.
Mechanical joints are very suitable for joining not only laminate floorings, but also wood floorings and composite floorings. Such floorboards may consist of a large number of different materials in the surface, the core and the rear side, and as described above these materials can also be included in the strip of the joining system, the locking element on the strip, fixing surfaces, vertical joints etc. This solution involving an integrated strip, however, leads to costs in the form of waste when the mechanical joint is being made. Alternatively, special materials, such as the aluminum strip 6 above, can be glued or mechanically fixed to the floorboard to be included as components in the joining system. Different joint designs affect the costs to a considerable extent.
A strip made of the same material as the body of the board and formed by working of the body of the board can in some applications be less expensive than an aluminum strip, especially for floorboards in lower price ranges. Aluminum, however, is more advantageous in respect of flexibility, resilience and displaceability as well as accuracy in the positioning of the locking element. Aluminum also affords the possibility of making a stronger locking element. If the same strength is to be achieved with a locking element of wood fiber, it must be wide with a large shearing surface, which results in a large amount of waste material in manufacture, or it must be reinforced with a binder. Depending on the size of the boards, working of, for instance, 10 mm of a joint edge may result in six times higher cost of waste per m2 of floor surface along the long sides compared with the short sides.
In addition to the above problems relating to undesirable waste of material, the present invention is based on the insight that the long sides and short sides can be optimized with regard to the specific locking functions that should be present in these joint edges.
As described above, locking of the long side is, as a rule, carried out by downwards angling. Also a small degree of bending down of the strip during locking can take place, as will be described in more detail below. Thanks to this downwards bending together with an inclination of the locking element, the boards can be angled down and up again with very tight joint edges. The locking element along the long sides should also have a high guiding capability so that the long side of a new board in connection with downwards angling is pushed towards the joint edge of the previously laid board. The locking element should have a large guiding part. For optimal function, the boards should along their long sides, after being joined, be able to take a mutual position transversely of the joint edges where there is a small play between locking element and locking groove.
On the other hand, locking of the short side is carried out by the long side being displaced so that the strip of the short side can be bent down and snap into the locking groove. Thus the short side must have means which accomplish downwards bending of the strip in connection with lateral displacement. The strength requirement is also higher on the short side. Guiding and displaceability are less important.
Summing up, there is a great need for providing a mechanical joint of the above type at a low cost and with optimal locking functions at each joint edge. It is not possible to achieve a low cost with prior-art solutions without also lowering the requirements as to strength and/or laying function. An object of the invention is to provide solutions which aim at lowering the cost with maintained strength and function.
According to a first aspect of the invention, a locking system for mechanical joining of floorboards is thus provided, where immediately juxtaposed upper parts of two adjacent joint edges of two joined floorboards together define a joint plane perpendicular to the principal plane of the floor boards. To obtain a joining of the two joint edges perpendicular to the joint plane, the locking system comprises in a manner known per se a locking groove which is formed in the underside of and extends in parallel with the first joint edge at a distance from the joint plane, and a portion projecting from the lower part of the second joint edge and below the first joint edge and integrated with a body of the board, said projecting portion supporting at a distance from the joint plane a locking element cooperating with the locking groove and thus positioned entirely outside the joint plane seen from the side of the second joint edge, said projecting portion having a different composition of materials compared with the body of the board. The inventive locking system is characterized in that the projecting portion presents at least two horizontally juxtaposed parts, which differ from each other at least in respect of the parameters material composition and material properties.
In a first embodiment of the first aspect of the invention, said at least two parts of the projecting portion are located at different distances from the joint plane. In particular, they may comprise an inner part closest to the joint plane and an outer part at a distance from the joint plane. The inner part and the outer part are preferably, but not necessarily, of equal length in the joint direction. In this first aspect of the invention, a material other than that included in the body is thus included in the joining system, and in particular the outer part can be at least partially formed of a separate strip which is made of a material other than that of the body of the board and which is integrally connected with the board by being factory-mounted. The inner part can be formed at least partially of a worked part of the body of the board and partially of part of said separate strip. The separate strip can be attached to such a worked part of the board body. The strip can be located entirely outside said joint plane, but can also intersect the joint plane and extend under the joint edge to be attached to the body also inside the joint plane.
This embodiment of the invention thus provides a kind of combination strip in terms of material, for example a projecting portion comprising an inner part with the material combination wood fiber/rear laminate/aluminum, and an outer part of aluminum sheet.
It is also possible to make the projecting part from three parts which are different in terms of material: an inner part closest to the joint plane, a central part and an outer part furthest away from the joint plane. The inner part and the outer part can possibly be equal in terms of material.
The portion projecting outside the joint plane need not necessarily be continuous or unbroken along the joint edge. A conceivable variant is that the projecting portion has a plurality of separate sections distributed along the joint edge. As an example, this can be accomplished by means of a separate strip with a continuous inner part and a toothed outer part, said strip being attachable to a part of the board body, said part being worked outside the joint plane.
In an alternative embodiment of the first aspect of the invention, said at least two parts, which differ in respect of at least one of the parameters material composition and material properties, are instead juxtaposed seen in the direction parallel with the joint edges. For example, there may be a plurality of strip types on one and the same side, where each strip type is optimized for a special function, such as strength and guiding in connection with laying. As an example, the strips can be made of different aluminum alloys and/or of aluminum having different states (for instance, as a result of different types of heat treatment).
According to a second aspect of the invention, a locking system for mechanical joining of floorboards is provided. In this second aspect of the invention, the projecting portion is instead formed in one piece with the body of the board and thus has the same material composition as the body of the board. This second aspect of the invention is characterized in that the projecting portion, as a direct consequence of machining of its upper side, presents at least two horizontally juxtaposed parts, which differ from each other in respect of at least one of the parameters material composition and material properties.
The inventive principle of dividing the projecting portion into several parts which differ from each other in terms of material and/or material properties thus is applicable also to the prior-art “wood fiber strip”.
In the same manner as described above for the first aspect of the invention, these two parts can be located at different distances from the joint plane, and especially there may be three or more parts with different material composition and/or material properties. Optionally, two such parts can be equal in respect of said parameters, but they may differ from a third.
In one embodiment, said two parts may comprise an inner part closest to the joint plane and an outer part at a distance from the joint plane. There may be further parts outside the outer part. Specifically, an outer part can be formed of fewer materials than an inner part. For instance, the inner part may consist or wood fiber and rear laminate, whereas the outer part, by machining from above, consists of rear laminate only. In one embodiment, the projecting portion may comprise—seen from the joint plane outwards—an inner part, an outer part and, outside the outer part, a locking element supported by the outer part. The locking element may differ from both inner and outer part in respect of said material parameters.
The projecting portion may consist of three laminated layers, and therefore it is possible, by working from above, to provide a locking system which, counted from the top, has a relatively soft upper guiding part which need not have any particular strength, a harder central part which forms a strong active locking surface and absorbs shear forces in the locking element, and a lower part which is connected with the rest of the projecting portion and which can be thin, strong and resilient.
Laminated embodiments can be suitable in such floorboards where the body of the board consists of, for instance, plywood or particle board with several layers. Corresponding layers can be found in the walls of the locking groove. For plywood, the material properties can be varied by changing the direction of fibers in the layers. For particle board, the material properties can be varied by using different chip dimensions and/or a binder in the different layers. The board body can generally consist of layers of different plastic materials.
In the definition of the invention, the term “projecting portion” relates to the part or parts of the board projecting outside the joint plane and having a function in the locking system in respect of supporting of locking element, strength, flexibility etc.
An underlay of underlay board, foam, felt or the like can, for instance, be mounted even in the manufacture of the boards on the underside thereof. The underlay can cover the underside up to the locking element, so that the joint between the underlays will be offset relative to the joint plane F. Although such an underlay is positioned outside the joint plane, it should thus not be considered to be included in the definition of the projecting portion in the appended claims.
In the aspect of the invention which relates to embodiments with a projecting portion of the same material as the body of the board, any thin material layers which remain after working from above should in the same manner not be considered to be included in the “projecting portion” in the cases where such layers do not contribute to the locking function in respect of strength, flexibility, etc. The same discussion applies to thin glue layers, binders, chemicals, etc. which are applied, for instance, to improve moisture proofing and strength.
According to a third aspect of the invention, there is provided a floorboard presenting a locking system according to the first aspect or the second aspect of the invention as defined above. Several possibilities of combining prior-art separate strips, prior-art wood fiber strips and “combination strips” according to the invention are available. These possibilities can be used optionally on long side and short side.
For the above aspects, the projecting portion of a given joint edge, for instance a long side, has at least two parts with different material composition and/or material properties. For optimization of a floorboard, such a difference in materials and/or material properties, however, may be considered to exist between the long sides and short sides of the board instead of within one and the same joint edge.
According to a fourth aspect of the invention, a rectangular floorboard is thus provided, comprising a body and first and second locking means integrated with the body and adapted to provide a mechanical joining of adjacent joint edges of such floorboards along long sides and short sides, respectively, of the boards in a direction perpendicular to the respective joint edges and in parallel with the principal plane of the floorboards. According to this aspect of the invention, the floorboard is characterized in that said first and second locking means differ in respect of at least one of the parameters material composition and material properties. Preferably, said first and second locking means each comprise on the one hand a portion which projects from a joint edge and which at a distance from the joint edge supports a locking element and, on the other hand, a locking groove, which is formed in the underside of the body at an opposite joint edge for engaging such a locking element of an adjacent board. At least one of said locking means on the long side and the short side may comprise a separate element which is integrally fixed to the body of the board at the factory and is made of a material other than that included in the body of the board. The other locking means may comprise an element which is formed in one piece with the body of the board.
Within the scope of the fourth aspect of the invention, there are several possibilities of combination. For example, it is possible to select an aluminum strip for the long side and a machined wood fiber strip for the short side or vice versa. Another example is that for the short side or the long side a “combination strip” according to the first and the second aspect of the invention is selected, and for the other side a “pure” aluminum strip or a “pure” worked wood fiber strip is selected.
The above problem of undesirable costs of material is solved according to the invention by the projecting portion being made of different materials and/or material combinations and thus specially adaptable to the selected materials in the floorboard and the function and strength requirements that apply to the specific floorboard and that are specific for long side and short side. This advantage of the invention will be evident from the following description.
Since different requirements are placed on the long side and the short side and also the cost of waste differs, improvements can also be achieved by the long side and the short side being made of different materials or combinations of materials. In some applications, the long side can have, for instance, an aluminum strip with high guiding capability and low friction whereas the short side can have a wood fiber strip. In other applications, the opposite is advantageous.
In some applications, there may also be a need for different types of strip on the same side. The side may consist of, for instance, a plurality of different strips which are made of different aluminum alloys, have different thicknesses etc. and in which certain parts are intended to achieve high strength and others are intended to be used for guiding.
Different aspects of the invention will now be described in more detail by way of examples with reference to the accompanying drawings. The parts of the inventive board which are equivalent to those of the prior-art board in.
a-c illustrate in three steps a downwards angling method for mechanical joining of long sides of floorboards according to WO 94/26999.
a-c illustrate in three steps a snap-in method for mechanical joining of short sides of floorboards according to WO 4/26999.
a and 3b show a floorboard according to WO 94/26999 seen from above and from below, respectively.
a shows on a larger scale a broken-away corner portion C1 of the board in
b and 6c are vertical sections of the joint edges along the long side 4a and the short side 5a of the board in
a-c show a downwards angling method for mechanical joining of long sides of the floorboard according to
d-e schematically show a portion of the body.
A first preferred embodiment of a floorboard 1 provided with a locking system according to the invention will now be described with reference to
The strip 6 is formed with a locking element 8, whose active locking surface 10 cooperates with a locking groove 14 in an opposite joint edge 4b of an adjacent board 1′ for horizontal locking together of the boards 1, 1′ transversely of the joint edge (D2). With a view to forming a vertical lock in the D1 direction, the joint edge 4a has a laterally open groove 36 and the opposite joint edge 4b has a laterally projecting tongue 38 (corresponding to the locking tongue 20), which in the joined state is received in the groove 36 (
In the joined state (
There is a significant difference between the inventive floorboard shown in
As described above, this feature means that the cost of material can be reduced. Thanks to the fact that the fixing shoulder 60 is displaced towards the locking element 8 to such an extent that it is positioned at least partially outside the joint plane F, a considerable saving can be achieved in respect of the consumption of aluminum sheet. A saving in the order of 25% is possible. This embodiment is particularly advantageous in cheaper floorboards where waste of wood fiber as a result of machining of the body is preferred to a high consumption of aluminum sheet. The waste of material, however, is limited thanks to the fact that the projecting portion can also be used as abutment surface for the tongue, which can then be made correspondingly narrower perpendicular to the joint plane with the ensuing reduced waste of material on the tongue side.
This constructional change to achieve saving in material does not have a detrimental effect on the possibility of resilient vertical motion that must exist in the projecting portion P. The strength of the locking element 8 is not affected either. The outer part P2 of aluminum is still fully resilient in the vertical direction, and the short sides 5a, 5b can be snapped together according to the same principle as in
The angling together of the long sides 4a, 4b can also be carried out according to the same principle as in
In the joined state according to
d shows a portion of the body of a board 1 or 1′ comprising plywood 100 with several layers.
When comparing the embodiments in
The above technique of providing the edge of the body, on the long side and/or short sides with separate materials that are fixed to the body to achieve special functions, such as strength, moisture proofing, flexibility etc, can be used also without utilizing the principles of the invention. In other words, it is possible also in other joining systems, especially mechanical joining systems, to provide the body with separate materials in this way. In particular, this material can be applied as an edge portion, which in some suitable fashion is attached to the edge of the body and which can extend over the height of the entire board or parts thereof.
In a preferred embodiment, the edge portion is applied to the body before the body is provided with all outer layers, such as top layer and rear balance layer. Especially, such layers can then be applied on top of the fixed, separate edge portion, whereupon the latter can be subjected to working in respect of form with a view to forming part of the joining system, such as the projecting portion with locking element and/or the tongue with locking groove.
In
The embodiments in
The embodiment in
Moreover, the aspects of the invention including a separate strip can preferably be implemented in combination with the use of an equalizing groove of the type described in WO 94/26999. Adjacent joint edges are equalized in the thickness direction by working of the underside, so that the upper sides of the floorboards are flush when the boards are joined. Reference letter E in
Although only preferred embodiments are specifically illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated that many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings and within the purview of the appended claims without departing from the spirit and intended scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
9801986 | Jun 1998 | SE | national |
The present application is a continuation of Ser. No. 10/906,109, filed on Feb. 3, 2005, and which is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 10/361,815, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 10/100,032, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 09/679,300, which is a continuation of PCT/SE99/00934. The entire contents of Ser. No. 10/361,815, Ser. No. 10/100,032, Ser. No. 09/679,300, and PCT/SE99/00934 are incorporated herein by reference. The invention generally relates to a locking system for providing mechanical joining of floorboards. More specifically, the invention concerns an improvement of a locking system of the type described and shown in WO 94/26999. The invention also relates to a floorboard provided with such a locking system. According to one more aspect of the invention, a floorboard with different designs of the locking system on long side and short side is provided.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
213740 | Connor | Apr 1879 | A |
1371856 | Cade | Mar 1921 | A |
1898364 | Gynn | Feb 1933 | A |
1925068 | Milton | Aug 1933 | A |
1995264 | Mason | Mar 1935 | A |
2026511 | Freeman | Dec 1935 | A |
2113076 | Bruce | Apr 1938 | A |
2123409 | Elmendorf | Jul 1938 | A |
2141708 | Elmendorf | Dec 1938 | A |
2149026 | McBride | Feb 1939 | A |
2269926 | Crooks | Jan 1942 | A |
2430200 | Wilson | Nov 1947 | A |
2740167 | Rowley | Apr 1956 | A |
2805852 | Ewert | Sep 1957 | A |
2914815 | Cook | Dec 1959 | A |
3200553 | Frashour et al. | Aug 1965 | A |
3204380 | Smith et al. | Sep 1965 | A |
3234074 | Bryant | Feb 1966 | A |
3282010 | King, Jr. | Nov 1966 | A |
3347048 | Brown et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
3387422 | Wanzer | Jun 1968 | A |
3440790 | Nerem | Apr 1969 | A |
3517927 | Kennel | Jun 1970 | A |
3538665 | Gohner | Nov 1970 | A |
3548559 | Reville, Jr. et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3720027 | Christensen | Mar 1973 | A |
3729368 | Ingham | Apr 1973 | A |
3842562 | Daigle | Oct 1974 | A |
3859000 | Webster | Jan 1975 | A |
3888061 | Kahr | Jun 1975 | A |
4169688 | Toshio | Oct 1979 | A |
RE30233 | Lane et al. | Mar 1980 | E |
4196554 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4242390 | Nemeth | Dec 1980 | A |
4426820 | Terbrack et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4471012 | Maxwell | Sep 1984 | A |
4646494 | Saarinen et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4694627 | Omholt | Sep 1987 | A |
4716700 | Hagemeyer | Jan 1988 | A |
4819932 | Trotter, Jr. | Apr 1989 | A |
4822440 | Hsu et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
5148850 | Urbanick | Sep 1992 | A |
5216861 | Meyerson | Jun 1993 | A |
5253464 | Nilsen | Oct 1993 | A |
5255726 | Hasegawa et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5274979 | Tsai | Jan 1994 | A |
5286545 | Simmons, Jr. | Feb 1994 | A |
5295341 | Kajiwara | Mar 1994 | A |
5349796 | Meyerson | Sep 1994 | A |
5474831 | Nystrom | Dec 1995 | A |
5496648 | Held | Mar 1996 | A |
5497589 | Porter | Mar 1996 | A |
5540025 | Takehara et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5653099 | MacKenzie | Aug 1997 | A |
5695875 | Larsson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5755068 | Ormiston | May 1998 | A |
5797237 | Finkell | Aug 1998 | A |
5899038 | Stroppiana | May 1999 | A |
5900099 | Sweet et al. | May 1999 | A |
5925211 | Rakauskas | Jul 1999 | A |
5968625 | Hudson | Oct 1999 | A |
6006486 | Moriau | Dec 1999 | A |
6101778 | Martensson | Aug 2000 | A |
6182413 | Magnusson | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209278 | Tychsen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6212838 | Eda | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216409 | Roy et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6247285 | Moebus | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6332733 | Hamberger et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6385936 | Schneider | May 2002 | B1 |
6446405 | Pervan | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6505452 | Hannig et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6532709 | Pervan | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6591568 | Palsson | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606834 | Martensson et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6647690 | Martensson | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6679011 | Beck et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6715253 | Pervan | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6722809 | Hamberger et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6769219 | Schwitte | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6880307 | Schwitte | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6898913 | Pervan | May 2005 | B2 |
6918220 | Pervan | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6922964 | Pervan | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6933043 | Son et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7003925 | Pervan | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7131242 | Martensson et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7484338 | Pervan et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7874119 | Pervan et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
20020059765 | Nogueira et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020178674 | Pervan | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020178682 | Pervan | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030033777 | Thiers et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030233809 | Pervan | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050034404 | Pervan | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050102937 | Pervan | May 2005 | A1 |
20050208255 | Pervan | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060117696 | Pervan | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060283127 | Pervan | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080000182 | Pervan | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080000189 | Pervan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005992 | Pervan | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080008871 | Pervan | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080060308 | Pervan | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20110072754 | Pervan et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 363 184 | Jul 2001 | CA |
1 212 275 | Mar 1966 | DE |
2 159 042 | Jun 1973 | DE |
2205232 | Aug 1973 | DE |
2 616 077 | Oct 1977 | DE |
3 041 781 | Jun 1982 | DE |
3538538 | Oct 1985 | DE |
33 43 601 | Feb 1987 | DE |
39 18 676 | Aug 1990 | DE |
4 130 115 | Sep 1991 | DE |
4 242 530 | Jun 1994 | DE |
4313037 | Aug 1994 | DE |
198 51 200 | Mar 2000 | DE |
299 22 649 | Mar 2000 | DE |
20 108 358 | Oct 2001 | DE |
0 652 340 | May 1995 | EP |
0 849 416 | Jun 1998 | EP |
1 165 906 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1 262 609 | Dec 2002 | EP |
1 430 423 | Mar 1976 | GB |
2 256 023 | Nov 1992 | GB |
11-078659 | Jul 1989 | JP |
2-194269 | Jul 1990 | JP |
2-121236 | Oct 1990 | JP |
03-169967 | Jul 1991 | JP |
5-021027 | Mar 1993 | JP |
6-158831 | Jun 1994 | JP |
6-280376 | Oct 1994 | JP |
06-320510 | Nov 1994 | JP |
7-102745 | Apr 1995 | JP |
07-180333 | Jul 1995 | JP |
07-300979 | Nov 1995 | JP |
07-310426 | Nov 1995 | JP |
8-300316 | Nov 1996 | JP |
09-038906 | Feb 1997 | JP |
10-299230 | Nov 1998 | JP |
2001-329681 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2003-027731 | Jan 2003 | JP |
372051 | Dec 1974 | SE |
450141 | Jun 1987 | SE |
9604483-9 | Jun 1998 | SE |
9604484-7 | Jun 1998 | SE |
WO 9217657 | Oct 1992 | WO |
WO 9313280 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO 9426999 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9627719 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO 9627721 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO 9747834 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9824994 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9824995 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9966151 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 9966152 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0047841 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0066856 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0102669 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0151732 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0151733 | Jul 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080028707 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10906109 | Feb 2005 | US |
Child | 11839259 | US | |
Parent | 10100032 | Mar 2002 | US |
Child | 10361815 | US | |
Parent | 09679300 | Oct 2000 | US |
Child | 10100032 | US | |
Parent | PCT/SE99/00934 | May 1999 | US |
Child | 09679300 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10361815 | Feb 2003 | US |
Child | 10906109 | US |