Locking system for mechanical joining of floorboards and method for production thereof

Abstract
The invention relates to a locking system for mechanical joining of floorboards (1, 1′) which have a body (30), a lower balancing layer (34) and an upper surface layer (32). A strip (6) is integrally formed with the body (30) of the floorboard (1) and extends under an adjoining floorboard (1′). The strip (6) has a locking element (8), which engages a looking groove (14) in the underside of the adjoining floorboard (1′) and forms a horizontal joint. A tongue (38) and a tongue groove (36) form a vertical joint between upper and lower plane-parallel contact surfaces (43, 45) and are designed in such manner that the lower contact surfaces (45) are on a level between the upper side of the locking element (8) and a plane containing the underside (3) of the floorboard. The invention also relates to a floorboard having such a locking system, a floor made of such floorboards, as well as a method for making such a locking system.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




The invention generally relates to the field of mechanical locking of floorboards. The invention relates to an improved locking system for mechanical locking of floorboards, a floorboard provided with such an improved locking system, a flooring made of such mechanically joined floorboards, and a method for making such floorboards. The invention generally relates to an improvement of a locking system of the type described and shown in WO 94/26999 and WO 99/66151.




More specifically, the invention relates to a locking system for mechanical joining of floorboards of the type having a body and preferably a surface layer on the upper side of the body and a balancing layer on the rear side of the body, said locking system comprising: (i) for horizontal joining of a first and a second joint edge portion of a first and a second floorboard respectively at a vertical joint plane, on the one hand a locking groove which is formed in the underside of said second board and extends parallel with and at a distance from said vertical joint plane at said second joint edge and, on the other hand, a strip integrally formed with the body of said first board, which strip at said first joint edge projects from said vertical joint plane and supports a locking element, which projects towards a plane containing the upper side of said first floorboard and which has a locking surface for coaction with said locking groove, and (ii) for vertical joining of the first and second joint edge, on the one hand a tongue which at least partly projects and extends from the joint plane and, on the other hand, a tongue groove adapted to coact with said tongue, the first and second floorboards within their joint edge portions for the vertical joining having coacting upper and coacting lower contact surfaces, of which at least the upper comprise surface portions in said tongue groove and said tongue.




FIELD OF APPLICATION OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is particularly suitable for mechanical joining of thin floating floorboards made up of an upper surface layer, an intermediate fibreboard body and a lower balancing layer, such as laminate flooring and veneer flooring with a fibreboard body. Therefore, the following description of the state of the art, problems associated with known systems, and the objects and features of the invention will, as a non-restricting example, focus on this field of application and, in particular, on rectangular floorboards with dimensions of about 1.2 m* 0.2 m and a thickness of about 7-10 mm, intended to be mechanically joined at the long side as well as the short side.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Thin laminate flooring and wood veneer flooring are usually composed of a body consisting of a 6-9 mm fibreboard, a 0.20-0.8 mm thick upper surface layer and a 0.1-0.6 mm thick lower balancing layer. The surface layer provides appearance and durability to the floorboards. The body provides stability and the balancing layer keeps the board level when the relative humidity (RH) varies during the year. The RH can vary between 15% and 90%. Conventional floorboards of the type are usually joined by means of glued tongue-and-groove joints (i.e. joints involving a tongue on a floorboard and a tongue groove on an adjoining floorboard) at the long and short sides. When laying the floor, the boards are brought together horizontally, whereby a projecting tongue along the joint edge of a first board is introduced into a tongue groove along the joint edge of the second adjoining board. The same method is used at the long side as well as the short side. The tongue and the tongue groove are designed for such horizontal joining only and with special regard to how glue pockets and gluing surfaces should be designed to enable the tongue to be efficiently glued within the tongue groove. The tongue-and-groove joint presents coacting upper and lower contact surfaces that position the boards vertically in order to ensure a level surface of the finished floor.




In addition to such conventional floors, which are connected by means of glued tongue-and-groove joints, floorboards have recently been developed which are instead mechanically joined and which do not require the use of glue. This type of mechanical joint system is hereinafter referred to as a “strip-lock system”, since the most characteristic component of this system is a projecting strip which supports a locking element.




WO 94/26999 and WO88/66151 (owner Välinge Aluminium AB) disclose a strip-lock system for joining building panels, particularly floorboards. This locking system allows the boards to be locked mechanically at right angles to as well as parallel with the principal plane of the boards at the long side as well as at the short side. Methods for making such floorboards are disclosed in EP 0958441 and EP 0958442 (owner Välinge Aluminium AB). The basic principles of the design and the installation of the floorboards, as well as the methods for making the same, as described in the four above-mentioned documents are usable for the present invention as well, and therefore these documents are hereby incorporated by reference.




In order to facilitate the understanding and description of the present invention, as well as the comprehension of the problems underlying the invention, brief description of the basic design and function of the known floorboards according to the above-mentioned WO 94/26999 and WO 99/66151 will be given below with reference to

FIGS. 1-3

in the accompanying drawings. Where applicable, the following description of the prior art also applies to the embodiments of the present invention described below.





FIGS. 3



a


and


3




b


are thus a top view and a bottom view respectively of a known floorboard


1


. The board


1


is rectangular with a top side


2


, an underside


3


, two opposite long sides


4




a


,


4




b


forming joint edge portions and two opposite short sides


5




a


,


5




b


forming joint edge portions.




Without the use of the glue, both the long sides


4




a


,


4




b


and the short sides


5




a


,


5




b


can be joined mechanically in a direction D


2


in

FIG. 1



c


, so that they join in a joint plane F (marked in

FIG. 2



c


). For this purpose, the board


1


has a flat strip


6


, mounted at the factory, projecting horizontally from its one long side


4




a


, which strip extends throughout the length of the long side


4




a


and which is made of flexible, resilient sheet aluminium. The strip


6


can be fixed mechanically according to the embodiment shown, or by means of glue, or in some other way. Other strip materials can be used, such as sheets of other metals, as well as aluminium or plastic sections. Alternatively, the strip


6


may be made in one piece with the board


1


, for example by suitable working of the body of the board


1


. The present invention is usable for floorboards in which the strip is integrally formed with the body and solves special problems appearing in such floorboards and the making thereof. The body of the floorboard need not be, but is preferably, made of a uniform material. However, the strip


6


is always integrated with the board


1


, i.e. it is never mounted on the board


1


in connection with the laying of the floor but it is mounted or formed at the factory. The width of the strip


6


can be about 30 mm and its thickness about 0.5 mm. A similar, but shorter strip


6


is provided along one short side


5




a


of the board


1


. The part of the strip


6


projecting from the joint plane F is formed with a locking element


8


extended throughout the length of the strip


6


. The locking element


8


has an operative locking surface


10


facing the joint plane F and having a height of e.g. 0.5 mm. When the floor is being laid, this locking surface


10


coacts with a locking groove


14


formed in the underside


3


of the joint edge portion


4




b


of the opposite long side of an adjoining board


1


′. The short side strip


6


′ is provided with a corresponding locking element


8


′, and the joint edge portion


5




b


of the opposite short side has a corresponding locking groove


14


′. The edge of the locking grooves


14


,


14


′ facing away from the joint plane F forms an operative locking surface


10


′ for coaction with the operative locking surface


10


of the locking element.




Moreover, for mechanical joining of both long sides and short sides also in the vertical direction (direction D


1


in

FIG. 1



c


) the board is formed with a laterally open recess


16


along one long side (joint edge portion


4




a


) and one short side (joint edge portion


5




a


). At the bottom, the recess


16


is defined by the respective strips


6


,


6


′. At the opposite edge portions


4




b


and


5




b


there is an upper recess


18


defining a locking tongue


20


coacting with the recess


16


(see

FIG. 2



a


).





FIGS. 1



a


-


1




c


show how two long sides


4




a


,


4




b


of two such boards


1


,


1


′ on an underlay


12


can be joined together by means of downward angling.

FIGS. 2



a


-


2




c


show how the short sides


5




a


,


5




b


of the boards


1


,


1


′ can be joined together by snap action. The long sides


4




a


,


4




b


can be joined together by means of both methods, while the short sides


5




a


,


5




b


—when the first row has been laid—are normally joined together subsequent to joining together the long sides


4




a


,


4




b


and by means of snap action only.




When a new board


1


′ and a previously installed board


1


are to be joined together along their long sides


4




a


,


4




b


as shown in

FIGS. 1



a


-


1




c


, the long side


4




b


of the new board


1


′ is pressed against the long side


4




a


of the previous board


1


as shown in

FIG. 1



a


, so that the locking tongue


20


is introduced into the recess


16


. The board


1


′ is then angled downwards towards the subfloor


12


according to

FIG. 1



b


. In this connection, the locking tongue


20


enters the recess


16


completely, while the locking element


8


of the strip


6


enters the locking groove


14


. During this downward angling the upper part


9


of the locking element


8


can be operative and provide guiding of the new board


1


′ towards the previously installed board


1


. In the joined position as shown in

FIG. 1



c


, the boards


1


,


1


′ are locked in both the direction D


1


and the direction D


2


along their long sides


4




a


,


4




b


, but the boards


1


,


1


′ can be mutually displaced in the longitudinal direction of the joint along the long sides


4




a


,


4




b.







FIGS. 2



a


-


2




c


show how the short sides


5




a


and


5




b


of the boards


1


,


1


′ can be mechanically joined in the direction D


1


as well as the direction D


2


by moving the new board


1


′ towards the previously installed board


1


essentially horizontally. Specifically, this can be carried out subsequent to joining the long side of the new board


1


′ to a previously installed board


1


in an adjoining row by means of the method according to

FIGS. 1



a


-


1




c


. In the first step in

FIG. 2



a


, bevelled surfaces adjacent to the recess


16


and the locking tongue


20


respectively cooperate such that the strip


61


is forced to move downwards as a direct result of the bringing together of the short sides


5




a


,


5




b


. During the final bringing together of the short sides, the strip


6


′ snaps up when the locking element


8


′ enters the locking groove


14


′, so that the operative locking surfaces


10


,


10


′ of the locking element


8


′ and of the locking groove


14


′ will engage each other.




By repeating the steps shown in

FIGS. 1



a-c


and


2




a-c


, the whole floor can be laid without the use of glue and along all joint edges. Known floorboards of the above-mentioned type are thus mechanically joined usually by first angling them downwards on the long side, and when the long side has been secured, snapping the short sides together by means of horizontal displacement of the new board


1


′ along the long side of the previously installed board


1


. The boards


1


,


1


′ can be taken up in the reverse order of laying without causing any damage to the joint, and be laid again. These laying principles are also applicable to the present invention.




For optimal function, subsequent to being joined together, the boards should be capable of assuming a position along their long sides in which a small play can exist between the operative locking surface


10


of the locking element and the operative locking surface


10


′ of the locking groove


14


. Reference is made to WO 94/26999 for a more detailed description of this play.




In addition to what is known from the above-mentioned patent specifications, a licensee of Välinge Aluminium AB, Norske Skog Flooring AS, Norway (NSF), introduced a laminated floor with mechanical joining according to WO 94/26999 in January 1996 in connection with the Domotex trade fair in Hannover, Germany. This laminated floor, which is marketed under the trademark Alloc®, is 7.2 mm thick and has a 0.6-mm aluminium strip


6


which is mechanically attached on the tongue side. The operative locking surface


10


of the locking element


8


has an inclination (hereinafter termed locking angle) of about 80° to the plane of the board. The vertical connection is designed as a modified tongue-and-groove joint, the term “modified” referring to the possibility of bringing the tongue groove and tongue together by way of angling.




WO 97/47834 (owner Unilin Beeher B.V., the Netherlands) describes a strip-lock system which has a fibreboard strip and is essentially based on the above known principles. In the corresponding product, “Uniclic®”, which this owner began marketing in the latter part of 1997, one seeks to achieve biasing of the boards. This results in high friction and makes it difficult to angle the boards together and to displace them. The document shows several embodiments of the locking system. The “Uniclic®” product is shown in section in

FIG. 4



b.






Other known locking systems for mechanical joining of board materials are described in, for example, GB-A2,256,023 showing unilateral mechanical joining for providing an expansion joint in a wood panel for outdoor use, and in U.S. Pat. No. 4,426,820 (shown in

FIG. 4



d


) which concerns a mechanical locking system for plastic sports floors, which floor is intentionally designed in such manner that neither displacement of the floorboards along each other nor locking of the short sides of the floorboards by snap action is allowed.




In the autumn of 1998, NSF introduced a 7.2-mm laminated floor with a strip-lock system which comprises a fibreboard strip and is manufactured according to WO 94/26999 and WO 99/66151. This laminated floor is marketed under the trademark “Fiboloc®” and has the cross-section illustrated in

FIG. 4



a.






In January 1999, Kronotex GmbH, Germany, introduced a 7.8 mm thick laminated floor with a strip lock under the trademark “Isilock®”. A cross-section of the joint edge portion of this system is shown in

FIG. 4



c


. Also in this floor, the strip is composed of fibreboard and a balancing layer.




During 1999, the mechanical joint system has obtained a strong position on the world market, and some twenty manufacturers have shown, in January 2000, different types of systems which essentially are variants of Fiboloc®, Uniclic® and Isilock®.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




Although the floor according to WO 94/26999 and WO 99/66151 and the floor sold under the trademark Fiboloc® exhibit major advantages in comparison with traditional, glued floors, further improvements are desirable mainly in thin floor structures.




The joint system consists of three parts. An upper part P


1


which takes up the load on the floor surface in the joint. An intermediate part P


2


that is necessary for forming the vertical joint in the D


1


direction in the form of tongue and tongue groove. A lower part P


3


which is necessary for forming the horizontal lock in the D


2


direction with strip and locking element.




In thin floorboards, it is difficult to provide, with prior-art technique, a joint system which at the same time has a sufficiently high and stable upper part, a thick, strong and rigid tongue and a sufficiently thick strip with a high locking element. Nor does a joint system according to

FIG. 4



d


, i.e. according to U.S. Pat. No. 4,426,820, solve the problem since a tongue groove with upper and lower contact surfaces which are parallel with the upper side of the floorboard or the floor plane, cannot be manufactured using the milling tools which are normally used when making floorboards. The rest of the joint geometry in the design according to

FIG. 4



d


cannot be manufactured by working a wood-based board since all surfaces abut each other closely, which does not provide space for manufacturing tolerances. Moreover, strip and locking elements are dimensioned in a manner that requires considerable modifications of the joint edge portion that is to be formed with a locking groove.




At present there are no known products or methods which afford satisfactory solutions to problems that are related to thin floorboards with mechanical joint systems. It has been necessary to choose compromises which (i) either result in a thin tongue and sufficient material thickness in the joint edge portion above the corresponding tongue groove in spite of plane-parallel contact surfaces or (ii) use upper and lower contact surfaces angled to each other and downwardly extending projections and corresponding recesses in the tongue and the tongue groove respectively of adjoining floorboards or (iii) result in a thin and mechanically weak locking strip with a locking element of a small height.




Therefore an object of the present invention is to obviate this and other drawbacks of prior art. Another object of the invention is to provide a locking system, a floorboard, and a method for making a floorboard having such a locking system, in which it is at the same time possible to obtain




(i) a stable joint with tongue and tongue groove,




(ii) a stable portion of material above the tongue groove,




(iii) a strip and a locking element, which have high strength and good function.




To achieve these criteria simultaneously, it is necessary to take the conditions into consideration which are present in the manufacture of floorboards with mechanical locking systems. The problems arise mainly when laminate-type thin floorboards are involved, but the problems exist in all types of thin floorboards. The three contradictory criteria will be discussed separately in the following.




(i) Tongue-and-Groove Joint




If the floor is thin there is not sufficient material for making a tongue groove and a tongue of sufficient thickness for the intended properties to be obtained. The thin tongue will be sensitive to laying damage, and the strength of the floor in the vertical direction will be insufficient. If one tries to improve the properties by making the contact surfaces between tongue and tongue groove oblique instead of parallel with the upper side of the floorboard, the working tools must during working be kept extremely accurately positioned both vertically and horizontally relative to the floorboard that is being made. This means that the manufacture will be significantly more difficult, and that it will be difficult to obtain optimal and accurate fitting between tongue and tongue groove. The tolerances in manufacture must be such that a fitting of a few hundredths of a millimetre is obtained since otherwise it will be difficult or impossible to displace the floorboards parallel with the joint edge in connection with the laying of the floorboards.




(ii) Material Portion Above the Tongue Groove




In a mechanical locking system glue is not used to keep tongue and tongue groove together in the laid floor. At a low relative humidity the surface layer of the floorboards shrinks, and the material portion that is located above the tongue groove and consequently has no balancing layer on its underside, can in consequence be bent upwards if this material portion is thin. Upwards bending of this material portion may result in a vertical displacement between the surface layers of adjoining floorboards in the area of the joint and causes an increased risk of wear and damage to the joint edge. To reduce the risk of upwards bending, it is therefore necessary to strive to obtain as thick a material portion as possible above the tongue groove. With known geometric designs of locking systems for mechanical joining of floorboards, it is then necessary to reduce the thickness of the tongue and tongue groove in the vertical direction of the floorboard if at the same time efficient manufacture with high and exact tolerances is to be carried out. A reduced thickness of tongue and tongue groove, however, results in, inter alia, the drawbacks that the strength of the joint perpendicular to the plane of the laid floor is reduced and that the risk of damage caused during laying increases.




(iii) Strip and Locking Element




The strip and the locking element are formed in the lower portion of the floorboard. If the total thickness of a thin floorboard is to be retained and at the same time a thick material portion above the locking groove is desirable, and locking element and strip are to be formed merely in that part of the floorboard which is positioned below the tongue groove, the possibilities of providing a strip having a locking element with a sufficiently high locking surface and upper guiding part will be restricted in an undesirable manner. The strip closest to the joint plane and the lower part of the tongue groove can be too thick and rigid and this makes the locking by snap action by backwards bending of the strip difficult. If at the same time the material thickness of the strip is reduced and a large part of the lower contact surface is retained in the tongue groove, this results on the other hand in a risk that the floorboard will be damaged while being laid or subsequently removed.




A problem that is also to be taken into consideration in the manufacture of floorboards, in which the components of the locking system—tongue/tongue groove and strip with a locking element engaging a locking groove—are to be made by working the edge portions of a board-shaped starting material, is that it must be possible to guide the tools in an easy way and position them correctly and with an extremely high degree of accuracy in relation to the board-shaped starting material. Guiding of a chip-removing tool in more than one direction means restrictions in the manufacture and also causes a great risk of reduced manufacturing tolerances and, thus, a poorer function of the finished floorboards.




To sum up, there is a great need for providing a locking system which takes the above-mentioned requirements, problems and desiderata into consideration to a greater extent than prior art. The invention aims at satisfying this need.




These and other objects of the invention are achieved by a locking system, a floorboard, a floor and a manufacturing method having the features stated in the independent claims. The dependent claims define particularly preferred embodiments of the invention.




The invention is based on a first understanding that the identified problems must essentially be solved with a locking system where the lower contact surface of the tongue groove is displaced downwards and past the upper part of the locking element.




The invention is also based on a second understanding which is related to the manufacturing technique, viz. that the tongue groove must be designed in such manner that it can be manufactured rationally and with extremely high precision using large milling tools which are normally used in floor manufacture and which, during their displacement relative to the joint edge portions of the floorboard that is to be made, need be guided in one direction only to provide the parallel contact surfaces while the tool is displaced along the joint edge portion of the floorboard material (or alternatively the joint edge portion is displaced relative to the tool). In known designs of the joint edge portions, such working requires in most cases guiding in two directions while at the same time a relative displacement of tool and floorboard material takes place.




According to a first aspect of the invention, a locking system is provided of the type which is stated by way of introduction and which according to the invention is characterised by the combination by the combination




that the upper and lower contact surfaces are essentially plane-parallel and extend essentially parallel with a plane containing the upper side of the floorboards, and




that the upper edge of the locking element, which upper edge is closest to a plane containing the upper side of the floorboards, is located in a horizontal plane, which is positioned between the upper and the lower contact surfaces but closer to the lower than the upper contact surfaces.




According to another aspect of the invention, a new manufacturing method for making strip and tongue groove is provided. According to conventional methods, the tongue groove is always made by means of a single tool. The tongue groove according to the invention is made by means of two tools in two steps where the lower part of the tongue groove and its lower contact surface are made by means of one tool and the upper part of the tongue groove and its upper contact surface are made by means of another tool. The method according to the invention comprises the steps 1) of forming part of the strip, part of the lower part of the tongue groove and the lower contact surface by means of an angled milling tool operating at an angle <90° to the horizontal plane of the floorboard and the strip, and 2) forming the upper part of the tongue groove and the upper contact surface by means of a separate horizontally operating tool.




According to another aspect of the invention, also a method for making a locking system and floorboards of the above type with plane-parallel upper and lower contact surfaces is provided. This method is characterised in




that parts of said tongue groove and at least parts of the lower contact surface are formed by means of a chip-removing tool, whose chip-removing surface portions are brought into removing contact with the first joint portion and are directed obliquely inwards and past said joint plane and




that the upper contact surface and parts of the tongue groove are formed by means of a chip-removing tool, whose chip-removing surface portions are moved into removing contact with the first joint portion in a plane which is essentially parallel with a plane containing the upper side of the floorboard.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIGS. 1



a-c


show in three stages a downward angling method for mechanical joining of long sides of floorboards according to WO 94/26999.





FIGS. 2



a-c


show in three stages a snap-action method for mechanical joining of short sides of floorboards according to WO 94/26999.





FIGS. 3



a-b


are a top plan view and a bottom view respectively of a floorboard according to WO 94/26999.





FIG. 4

shows three strip-lock systems available on the market with an integrated strip of fibreboard and a balancing layer, and a strip lock system according to U.S. Pat. No. 4,426,820.





FIG. 5

shows a strip lock for joining of long sides of floorboards, where the different parts of the joint system are made in three levels P


1


, P


2


and P


3


as shown and described in WO 99/66151.





FIG. 6

shows parts of two joined floorboards which have been formed with a locking system according to the present invention.




FIGS.


7


+


8


illustrate an example of a manufacturing method according to the invention for manufacturing a floorboard with a locking system according to the invention.

FIGS. 9



a-d


show variants of a floorboard and a locking system according to the present invention.











DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Prior to the description of preferred embodiments, with reference to

FIG. 5

, a detailed explanation will first be given of the most important parts in a strip lock system.




The cross-sections shown in

FIG. 5

are hypothetical, not published cross-sections, but they are fairly similar to the locking system of the known floorboard “Fiboloc®” and to the locking system according to WO 99/66151. Accordingly,

FIG. 5

does not represent the invention. Parts corresponding to those in the previous Figures are in most cases provided with the same reference numerals. The construction, function and material composition of the basic components of the boards in

FIG. 5

are essentially the same as in embodiments of the present invention, and consequently, where applicable, the following description of

FIG. 5

also applies to the subsequently described embodiments of the invention.




In the embodiment shown, the boards


1


,


11


in

FIG. 5

are rectangular with opposite long sides


4




a


,


4




b


and opposite short sides


5




a


,


5




b


.

FIG. 5

shows a vertical cross-section of a part of a long side


4




a


of the board


1


, as well as a part of a long side


4




b


of an adjoining board


1


′. The bodies of the boards


1


can be composed of a fibreboard body


30


, which supports a surface layer


32


on its front side and a balancing layer


34


on its rear side (underside). A strip


6


is formed from the body and balancing layer of the floorboard and supports a locking element


8


. Therefore the strip


6


and the locking element


8


in a way constitute an extension of the lower part of the tongue groove


36


of the floorboard


1


. The locking element


8


formed on the strip


6


has an operative locking surface


10


which cooperates with an operative locking surface


10


′ in a locking groove


14


in the opposite joint edge


4




b


of the adjoining board


1


′. By the engagement between the operative locking surfaces


10


,


10


′ a horizontal locking of the boards


1


,


1


′ transversely of the joint edge (direction D


2


) is obtained. The operative locking surface


10


of the locking element


8


and the operative locking surface


10


′ of the locking groove form a locking angle A with a plane parallel with the upper side of the floorboards. This locking angle is <90°, preferably 55-85°. The upper part of the locking element has a guiding part


9


which, when angled inwards, guides the floorboard to the correct position. The locking element and the strip have a relative height P


3


.




To form a vertical lock in the D


1


direction, the joint edge portion


4




a


has a laterally open tongue groove


36


and the opposite joint edge portion


4




b


has a laterally projecting tongue


38


which in the joined position is received in the tongue groove


36


. The upper contact surfaces


43


and the lower contact surfaces


45


of the locking system are also plane and parallel with the plane of the floorboard.




In the joined position according to

FIG. 5

, the two juxtaposed upper joint edge portions


41


and


42


of the boards


1


,


1


′ define a vertical joint plane F. The tongue groove has a relative height P


2


and the material portion above the upper contact surface


43


of the tongue groove has a relative height P


1


up to the upper side


32


of the floorboard. The material portion of the floorboard below the tongue groove has a relative height P


3


. Also the height of the locking element


8


corresponds to approximately the height P


3


. The thickness of the floorboard therefore is T=P


1


+P


2


+P


3


.





FIG. 6

shows an example of an embodiment according to the invention, which differs from the embodiment in

FIG. 5

by the tongue


38


and the tongue groove


36


being displaced downwards in the floorboard so that they are eccentrically positioned. Moreover, the thickness of the tongue


38


(and, thus, the tongue groove


36


) has been increased while at the same time the relative height of the locking element


8


has been retained at approximately P


3


. Both the tongue


38


and the material portion above the tongue groove


36


are therefore significantly more rigid and stronger while at the same time the floor thickness T, the outer part of the strip


6


and the locking element


8


are unchanged. In the invention, the lower contact surface


45


has been displaced outwards to be positioned essentially outside the tongue groove


36


and outside the joint plane F on the upper side of the strip


6


. By the inclination of the underside


44


of the outer part of the tongue, the tongue


38


will thus engage the lower contact surface at, or just outside, the joint plane F. Moreover, the tongue groove


36


extends further into the floorboard


1


than does the free end of the tongue


38


in the mounted state, so that there is a gap


46


between tongue and tongue groove. This gap


46


facilitates the insertion of the tongue


38


into the tongue groove


36


when being angled inwards similarly to that shown in

FIG. 1



a


. Moreover, the upper opening edge of the tongue groove


36


at the joint plane F is bevelled at


47


, which also facilitates the insertion of the tongue into the tongue groove.




As mentioned, the height of the locking element


8


has been retained essentially unchanged compared with prior art according to WO 99/661151 and “Fiboloc®”. This results in the locking effect being retained. The locking angle A of the two cooperating operative locking surfaces


10


,


10


′ is <90° and preferably in the range 55-85°. Most preferably, the locking surfaces


10


,


10


′ extend approximately tangentially to a circular arc which has its centre where the joint plane F passes through the upper side of the floorboard. If the guiding portion


9


of the locking element immediately above the locking surface


10


has been slightly rounded, the guiding of the locking element


8


into the locking groove


14


is facilitated in the downward angling of the floorboard


1


′ similarly to that shown in

FIG. 1



b


. Since the locking together of the two adjoining floorboards


1


,


1


′ in the D


2


direction is achieved by the engagement between the operative locking surfaces


10


,


10


′, the locking groove


14


can be somewhat wider than the locking element


8


, seen transversely of the joint, so that there can be a gap between the outer end of the locking element and the corresponding surface of the locking groove. As a result, the mounting of the floorboards is facilitated without reducing the locking effect. Moreover, it is preferred to have a gap between the upper side of the locking element


8


and the bottom of the locking groove


14


. Therefore the depth of the groove


14


should be at least equal to the height of the locking element


8


, but preferably the depth of the groove should be somewhat greater than the height of the locking element.




According to a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention, the tongue


38


and the tongue groove


36


are to be positioned eccentrically in the thickness direction of the floorboards and placed closer to the underside than to the upper side of the floorboards.




The most preferred according to the invention is that the locking system and the floorboards satisfy the relationship








T−


(


P




1


+0.3


*P




2


)


>P




3


,






where




T=thickness of the floorboard,




P


1


=distance between the upper side


2


of the floorboard and said upper contact surface


43


, measured in the thickness direction of the floorboard,




P


2


=distance between said upper and lower contact surfaces


43


,


45


, measured in the thickness direction of the floorboard, and




P


3


=distance between the upper edge


49


of the locking element


8


closest to the upper side of the floorboard and the underside


3


of the floorboard.




It has been found advantageous from the viewpoint of strength and function if the locking system also satisfies the relationship P


2


>P


3


.




Moreover, it has been found particularly advantageous if the relationship P


3


>0.3 * T is satisfied since this results in more reliable connection of adjoining floorboards.




If the relationship P


1


>0.3 * T is satisfied, the best material thickness is obtained in the material portion between the tongue groove


36


and the upper side


2


of the floorboard. This reduces the risk of this material portion warping so that the superposed surface coating will no longer be in the same plane as the surface coating of an adjoining floorboard.




To ensure great strength of the tongue


38


it is preferred for the dimensions of the tongue to satisfy the relationship P


2


>0.3 * T.




By forming the cooperating portions of the tongue


38


and the tongue groove


36


in such manner that the inner boundary surfaces of the tongue groove in the first floorboard


1


are positioned further away from the vertical joint plane F than the corresponding surfaces of the tongue


38


of the second floorboard


1


′ when the first and the second floorboards are mechanically assembled, the insertion of the tongue into the tongue groove is facilitated. At the same time the requirements for exact guiding of the chip-removing tools in the plane of the floorboards are reduced.




Moreover it is preferred for the locking groove


14


, seen perpendicular to the joint plane F, to extend further away from the vertical joint plane F than do corresponding portions of the locking element


8


, when the first and the second floorboards


1


,


1


′ are mechanically assembled. This design also facilitates laying and taking up of the floorboards.




In a floor which is laid using boards with a locking system according to the present invention, the first and the second floorboards are identically designed. Moreover it is preferred for the floorboards to be mechanically joinable with adjoining floorboards along all four sides by means of a locking system according to the present invention.





FIGS. 7 and 8

describe the manufacturing technique according to the present invention. Like in prior-art technique, chip-removing working is used, in which chip-removing milling or grinding tools are brought into chip-removing contact with parts of said first and second joint edges


4




a


,


4




b


of the floorboard on the one hand to form the upper surface portions


41


,


42


of the joint edges


4




a


,


4




b


so that these are positioned exactly at the correct distance from each other, measured in the width direction of the floorboard, and on the other hand to form the locking groove


14


, the strip


6


, the locking element


8


, the tongue


38


, the tongue groove


36


and the upper and lower contact surfaces


43


and


45


respectively.




Like in prior-art technique, the floorboard material is first worked to obtain the correct width and the correct length between the upper surface portions


41


,


42


of the joint edges


4




a


,


4




b


(


5




a


,


5




b


respectively).




According to the invention, the subsequent chip-removing working then takes place, in contrast to prior-art technique, by chip-removing working in two stages with tools which must be guided with high precision in one direction only (in addition to the displacement direction along the floorboard material).




Manufacturing by means of angled tools is a method known per se, but manufacturing of plane-parallel contact surfaces between tongue and tongue groove in combination with a locking element, whose upper side is positioned in a plane above the lower contact surface of the locking system, is not previously known.




In contrast to prior-art technique the tongue groove


36


is thus made in two distinct stages by using two tools V


1


, V


2


. The first chip-removing tool V


1


is used to form parts of the tongue groove


38


closest to the underside


3


of the floorboard and at least part of the lower contact surface


45


. This tool V


1


has chip-removing surface portions which are directed obliquely inwards and past the joint plane F. An embodiment of the chip-removing surface portions of this first tool is shown in FIG.


7


. In this case, the tool forms the entire lower contact surface


45


, the lower parts of the tongue groove


36


which is to be made, and the operative locking surface portion


10


and guiding surface


9


of the locking element


8


. As a result, it will be easier to maintain the necessary tolerances since this tool need be positioned with high precision merely as regards cutting depth (determines the position of the lower contact surface


45


in the thickness direction of the floorboard) and in relation to the intended joint plane F. In this embodiment, this tool therefore forms portions of the tongue groove


36


up to the level of the upper side of the locking element


8


. The location of the tool in the vertical direction relative to the floorboard is easy to maintain, and if the location perpendicular to the joint plane F is exactly guided, the operative surface portion


10


of the locking element will be placed exactly at the correct distance from the edge between the joint plane F and the upper side


3


of the floorboard.




The first tool V


1


thus forms parts of the tongue groove


36


that is to be made, the strip


6


, the lower contact surface


45


, the operative locking surface


10


and the guiding part


9


of the locking element


8


. Preferably this tool is angled at an angle A to the principal plane of the floorboard, which corresponds to the angle of the locking surface.




It is obvious that this working in the first manufacturing step can take place in several partial steps, where one of the partial steps is the forming of merely the lower parts of the tongue groove and of the lower contact surface


45


outside the joint plane


5


by means of an angled milling tool. The rest of the strip and the locking element can in a subsequent partial step be formed by means of another tool, which can also be angled and inclined correspondingly. The second tool, however, can also be straight and be moved perpendicular downwards in relation to the upper side of the floorboard. Therefore the tool V


1


can be divided into two or more partial tools, where the partial tool closest to the joint plane F forms parts of the tongue groove and the entire lower contact surface


45


, or parts thereof, while the subsequent partial tool or tools form the rest of the strip


6


and its locking element


8


.




In a second manufacturing step, the rest of the tongue groove


38


and the entire contact surface


43


are formed by means of a chip-removing tool V


2


, whose chip-removing surface portions (shown in

FIG. 8

) are moved into chip-removing engagement with the first joint portion


4




a


in a plane which is essentially parallel with a plane containing the upper side


2


of the floorboard. The insertion of this tool V


2


thus takes place parallel with the upper side


3


of the floorboard, and the working takes place in levels between the upper side of the locking element


8


and the upper side of the floorboard.




The preferred manufacturing method is most suitable for rotating milling tools, but the joint system can be manufactured in many other ways using a plurality of tools which each operate at different angles and in different planes.




By the forming of the tongue groove being divided into two steps and being carried out using two tools, V


1


and V


2


, it has become possible to position the lower contact surface


45


at a level below the upper side of the locking element. Moreover, this manufacturing method makes it possible to position the tongue and the tongue groove eccentrically in the floorboard and form the tongue and the tongue groove with a greater thickness in the thickness direction of the floorboard than has been possible up to now in the manufacture of floorboards, in which the strip is integrated with and preferably monolithic with the rest of the floorboard. The invention can be used for floorboards where the main portion of the board and the joint edge portions of the board are of the same composition, as well as for floorboards where the joint edge portions are made of another material but are integrated with the board before the chip-removing w working to form the different parts of the locking system.




A plurality of variants of the invention are feasible. The joint system can be made with a number of different joint geometries, where some or all of the above parameters are different, especially when the purpose is to prioritise a certain property over the other properties.




The owner has contemplated and tested a number of variants based on that stated above.




The height of the locking element and the angle of the surfaces can be varied. Nor is it necessary for the locking surface of the locking groove and the locking surface of the locking element to have the same inclination. The thickness of the strip may vary over its width perpendicular to the joint plane F, and in particular the strip can be thinner in the vicinity of the locking element. Also the thickness of the board between the joint plane F and the locking groove


14


may vary. The vertical and horizontal joint can be made with a play between all surfaces which are not operative in the locking system, so that the friction in connection with displacement parallel with the joint edge is reduced and so that mounting is thus facilitated. The depth of the tongue groove can be made very small, and also with a tongue groove depth of less than 1 mm, sufficient strength can be achieved with a rigid thick tongue.





FIGS. 9



a-d


show some examples of other embodiments of the invention. Those parts of the tongue groove and the strip which are positioned below the marked horizontal plane H, are preferably made by means of an angled tool (corresponding to the tool V


1


), while those parts of the tongue groove which are positioned above this horizontal plane are made by means of a horizontally operating tool (corresponding to the tool V


2


).





FIG. 9



a


shows an embodiment where the lower contact surface


45


is essentially outside the joint plane F and a very small part of the contact surface is inside the joint plane F. Between the tongue


38


and the locking groove


14


there is a recess


50


in the underside of the tongue. This recess serves to reduce the friction between the tongue and the strip


6


when displacing the adjoining floorboards


1


,


1


′ along the joint plane F in connection with the laying of the boards.





FIG. 9



b


shows an embodiment where the lower contact surface


45


is positioned completely outside the joint plane F. For reducing the friction, a recess


51


has in this case been formed in the upper side of the strip


6


, while the contact surface


45


of the locking tongue is kept plane. The locking element


8


has been made somewhat lower, which makes the locking system particularly suitable for joining of short sides by snap action. The recess


51


in the strip


6


also reduces the rigidity of the strip and thus facilitates the joining by snap action.





FIG. 9



c


shows an embodiment with a centrically positioned tongue


38


and a short rigid strip


6


where the lower plane contact surface


45


constitutes the upper side of the strip and is largely positioned outside the joint plane F. Just like in the other embodiments according to the invention, the lower contact surface


45


is positioned in a plane below the upper side of the locking element


8


, i.e. below the marked horizontal plane H.





FIG. 9



d


shows an embodiment with a stable locking system. Locking in the vertical direction (D


1


direction) takes place by means of upper and lower contact surfaces


43


and


45


respectively, of which the lower extend merely a short distance from the joint plane F. The portions of the strip outside the lower contact surface


45


up to the locking element have been lowered by forming a recess


53


and therefore they do not make contact with the adjoining floorboard


1


′. This means a reduction of the friction when displacing adjoining floorboards in the direction of the joint plane F during the laying of the boards. The example according to

FIG. 9



d


also shows that the demands placed on the surface portions of the tongue groove


36


furthest away from the joint plane F need not be very high, except that there should be a play


46


between these surface portions and the corresponding surface portions of the tongue


38


. The Figure also shows that the working with the tool V


2


can be carried out to a greater depth than would result in a straight inclined surface


54


which extends with the same inclination above the horizontal plane H.



Claims
  • 1. A locking floorboard system for mechanical joining of floorboards, each of the floorboards having a body and an upper side of the body and a balancing layer on a rear side of the body, said system comprising:a first floorboard; a second floorboard; for horizontal joining of a first joint edge of the first floorboard to a second joint edge of the second floorboard at a vertical joint plane, a locking groove which is formed in an underside of said second floorboard and extending parallel with and at a distance from said vertical joint plane at said second joint edge and, a strip integrally formed with the body of said first floorboard, which strip at said first joint edge projects from said vertical joint plane and supports a locking element, which locking element projects towards a plane containing the upper side of said first floorboard and which locking element has a locking surface for coaction with said locking groove, wherein the strip is formed in one piece with the body of the first floorboard and for vertical joining of the first joint edge and the second joint edge, a tongue on the second floorboard which at least partly projects and extends from the vertical joint plane and, a tongue groove in the first floorboard adapted to coact with said tongue, the first and second floorboards having coacting upper and coacting lower contact surfaces, the upper coacting contact surfaces comprise surface portions in said tongue groove and said tongue, the upper and lower contact surfaces are essentially plane-parallel and extend essentially parallel with a plane containing the upper side of the floorboards, and the upper edge of the locking element, which upper edge is closest to a plane containing the upper side of the floorboards, is located in a horizontal plane, which horizontal plane is positioned between the upper and the lower contact surfaces but closer to the lower contact surfaces than to the upper contact surfaces.
  • 2. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein portions of the floorboard between the lower contact surface and the locking groove have a thickness which is equal to or less than the distance between the lower contact surface and the upper side of the floorboard.
  • 3. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the portion of the strip between the lower contact surface and the locking element has a thickness which is equal to or less than the distance between the lower contact surface and the underside of the floorboard.
  • 4. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the tongue and the tongue groove are arranged eccentrically in the thickness direction of the floorboards and placed closer to the underside than to the upper side of the floorboards.
  • 5. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the locking element has an operative locking surface for coaction with a corresponding operative locking surface of the locking groove, and that said operative locking surfaces are inclined at an angle which is lower than 90°, measured relative to a plane containing the underside of the floorboard.
  • 6. The system as claimed in claim 5, wherein the angle is 55 to 85°.
  • 7. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the relationship T−(P1+0.3 * P2)>P3, whereT=thickness of the floorboard, P1=distance between the upper side of the floorboard and said upper contact surface, measured in the thickness direction of the floorboard, P2=distance between said upper and lower contact surfaces measured in the thickness direction of the floorboard, and P3=distance between the upper edge of the locking element closest to the upper side of the floorboard and the underside of the floorboard.
  • 8. The system as claimed in claim 7, wherein the relationship P2>P3.
  • 9. The system as claimed in claim 7, wherein the relationship P1>0.3 * T.
  • 10. The system as claimed in claim 7, wherein the relationship P2>0.3 * T.
  • 11. The system as claimed in claim 7, wherein the inner boundary surfaces of the tongue groove in the first floorboard are positioned further away from the vertical joint plane than corresponding surfaces of the tongue of the second floorboard when the first and second floorboards are mechanically assembled.
  • 12. The system as claimed in claim 7, wherein, as seen perpendicular to the joint plane, the locking groove extends further away from the vertical joint plane than the corresponding portions of the locking element when the first and second floorboards are mechanically assembled.
  • 13. The system as claimed in claim 7, wherein the first and second floorboards are identically designed.
  • 14. A floor consisting of floorboards which are mechanically joined by means of the locking system as claimed in claim 13.
  • 15. A floorboard provided with a locking system as claimed in claims 7.
  • 16. A floorboard as claimed in claim 15, which is mechanically joinable with adjoining boards along all its four sides by means of a locking system.
  • 17. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein each of the floorboards includes a surface layer on an upper side of the body.
  • 18. A method for making floorboards with a locking system for mechanical joining of two adjoining floorboards, which have a body and an upper side of the body and a balancing layer on the rear side of the body, in which method the floorboards, by chip-removing working, are formed with a locking system, whichfor horizontal joining of a first and a second joint edge of a first and a second floorboard at a vertical joint plane, comprises a locking groove formed in the underside of said second board and extending parallel with and at a distance from said vertical joint plane at said second joint edge and, a strip formed integrally with the body of said first board and at said first joint edge projecting from said vertical joint plane and supporting a locking element, which projects towards a plane containing the upper side of said first floorboard and having a locking surface for coaction with said locking groove, and for vertical joining of the first and second joint edge of the first and second floorboards, comprises a tongue which projects from said second joint edge and the upper part of which extends from said vertical joint plane and, a tongue groove intended for coaction with said tongue, said first and second floorboards having cooperating upper and cooperating lower contact surfaces which are essentially plane-parallel and extend essentially parallel with a plane containing the upper side of said floorboards, of which at least the upper contact surfaces comprise surface portions in said tongue groove and said tongue, in which method the chip-removing working is carried out by chip-removing milling or grinding tools being brought into chip-removing contact with parts of said first and second joint edges of the floorboard for forming said locking groove, said strip, said locking element, said tongue, said tongue groove and said upper and lower contact surfaces, wherein parts of said tongue groove and at least parts of the lower contact surface are formed by means of a chip-removing tool, whose chip-removing surface portions are brought into removing contact with the first joint portion and are directed obliquely inwards and past said joint plane and the upper contact surface and parts of the tongue groove are formed by means of a chip-removing tool, whose chip-removing surface portions are brought into removing engagement with the first joint portion in a plane which is essentially parallel with a plane containing the upper side of the floorboard.
  • 19. The method as claimed in claim 18, wherein the chip-removing working is carried out in such manner that portions of the floorboard between the lower contact surface and the locking groove obtains a thickness which is equal to or less than the distance between the lower contact surface and the upper side of the floorboard.
  • 20. The method as claimed in claim 19, wherein the chip-removing working is carried out in such manner that the upper edge of the locking element, which upper edge is closest to a plane containing the upper side of the floorboard, is positioned between the lower and upper contact surfaces but closer to the lower than to the upper contact surfaces.
  • 21. The method as claimed in claim 20, wherein the chip-removing working is carried out in such manner that the relationshipT−(P1+0.3*P2)>P3, is achieved, whereT=thickness of the floorboard, P1=distance between the upper side of the floorboard and said upper contact surface, measured in the thickness direction of the floorboard, P2=distance between said upper and lower contact surfaces measured in the thickness direction of the floorboard, and P3=distance between the upper edge of the locking element closest to the upper side of the floorboard and the underside of the floorboard.
  • 22. The method as claimed in claim 21, wherein the chip-removing working is carried out in such a manner that the relationship P2>P3 is achieved.
  • 23. The method as claimed in claim 21, wherein the chip-removing working is carried out in such manner that the relationship P3>0.3 * T is achieved.
  • 24. The method as claimed in claim 21, wherein the chip-removing working is carried out in such manner that the relationship P1>0.3 * T is achieved.
  • 25. The method as claimed in claim 21, wherein the chip-removing working is carried out in such manner that the relationship P2>0.3 * T is achieved.
  • 26. The method as claimed in claim 25, wherein the chip-removing working is carried out in such manner that the inner boundary surfaces of the tongue groove in the first floorboard are located further away from the vertical joint plane than the corresponding outer boundary surfaces of the tongue of the second floorboard when the first and second floorboards are mechanically assembled.
  • 27. The method as claimed in claim 25, wherein this chip-removing working is carried out in such manner that the locking groove, seen perpendicular to the joint plane, extends further away from the vertical joint plane than corresponding portions of the locking element when the first and second floorboards are mechanically assembled.
  • 28. The method as claimed in claim 25, wherein the chip-removing working is carried out in such-manner that the bottom of the locking groove is positioned closer to the upper side of the floorboard than is the upper side of the locking element.
  • 29. The method as claimed in claim 25, wherein the chip-receiving working is carried out in such manner that the locking element obtains an operative locking surface for coaction with a corresponding operative locking surface of the locking groove, and that these operative locking surfaces will be inclined at such an angle relative to a plane containing the underside of the floorboard that the locking surfaces extend essentially tangentially relative to a circular arc with its centre where the vertical joint plane intersects the upper side of the floorboard, seen in a vertical section perpendicular to said joint plane.
  • 30. The method as claimed in claim 18, wherein the chip-removing working is carried out in such manner that the tongue and the tongue groove are positioned eccentrically in the thickness direction of the floorboard and closer to the underside than to the upper side of the floorboard.
  • 31. The method as claimed in claim 18, wherein each of the floorboards has a surface layer on the upper side of the body.
  • 32. A locking floorboard system for mechanical joining of floorboards, each of the floorboards having a body and an upper side of the body and a balancing layer on a rear side of the body, said system comprising:a first floorboard; a second floorboard; for horizontal joining of a first joint edge of the first floorboard to a second joint edge of the second floorboard at a vertical joint plane, a locking groove which is formed in an underside of said second floorboard and extending parallel with and at a distance from said vertical joint plane at said second joint edge and, a strip integrally formed with the body of said first floorboard, which strip at said first joint edge projects from said vertical joint plane and supports a locking element, which locking element projects towards a plane containing the upper side of said first floorboard and which locking element has a locking surface for coaction with said locking groove, and for vertical joining of the first joint edge and the second joint edge, a tongue on the second floorboard which at least partly projects and extends from the vertical joint plane and, a tongue groove in the first floorboard adapted to coact with said tongue, the first and second floorboards having coacting upper and coacting lower contact surfaces, the upper coacting contact surfaces comprise surface portions in said tongue groove and said tongue, the upper and lower contact surfaces are essentially plane-parallel and extend essentially parallel with a plane containing the upper side of the floorboards, and the upper edge of the locking element, which upper edge is closest to a plane containing the upper side of the floorboards, is located in a horizontal plane, which horizontal plane is positioned between the upper and the lower contact surfaces but closer to the lower contact surfaces than to the upper contact surfaces. wherein the relationship T−(P1+0.3 * P2)>P3, where T=thickness of the floorboard, P1=distance between the upper side of the floorboard and said upper contact surface, measured in the thickness direction of the floorboard, P2=distance between said upper and lower contact surfaces measured in the thickness direction of the floorboard, and P3=distance between the upper edge of the locking element closest to the upper side of the floorboard and the underside of the floorboard, wherein the relationship P3>0.3 * T.
  • 33. A locking floorboard system for mechanical joining of floorboards, each of the floorboards having a body and an upper side of the body and a balancing layer on a rear side of the body, said system comprising:a first floorboard; a second floorboard; for horizontal joining of a first joint edge of the first floorboard to a second joint edge of the second floorboard at a vertical joint plane, a locking groove which is formed in an underside of said second floorboard and extending parallel with and at a distance from said vertical joint plane at said second joint edge and, a strip integrally formed with the body of said first floorboard, which strip at said first joint edge projects from said vertical joint plane and supports a locking element, which locking element projects towards a plane containing the upper side of said first floorboard and which locking element has a locking surface for coaction with said locking groove, and for vertical joining of the first joint edge and the second joint edge, a tongue on the second floorboard which at least partly projects and extends from the vertical joint plane and, a tongue groove in the first floorboard adapted to coact with said tongue, the first and second floorboards having coacting upper and coacting lower contact surfaces, the upper coacting contact surfaces comprise surface portions in said tongue groove and said tongue, the upper and lower contact surfaces are essentially plane-parallel and extend essentially parallel with a plane containing the upper side of the floorboards, and the upper edge of the locking element, which upper edge is closest to a plane containing the upper side of the floorboards, is located in a horizontal plane, which horizontal plane is positioned between the upper and the lower contact surfaces but closer to the lower contact surfaces than to the upper contact surfaces. wherein the relationship T−(P1+0.3 * P2)>P3, where T=thickness of the floorboard, P1=distance between the upper side of the floorboard and said upper contact surface, measured in the thickness direction of the floorboard, P2=distance between said upper and lower contact surfaces measured in the thickness direction of the floorboard, and P3=distance between the upper edge of the locking element closest to the upper side of the floorboard and the underside of the floorboard, wherein there is a gap between the upper side of the locking element and the bottom of the locking groove.
  • 34. A locking floorboard system for mechanical joining of floorboards, each of the floorboards having a body and an upper side of the body and a balancing layer on a rear side of the body, said system comprising:a first floorboard; a second floorboard; for horizontal joining of a first joint edge of the first floorboard to a second joint edge of the second floorboard at a vertical joint plane, a locking groove which is formed in an underside of said second floorboard and extending parallel with and at a distance from said vertical joint plane at said second joint edge and, a strip integrally formed with the body of said first floorboard, which strip at said first joint edge projects from said vertical joint plane and supports a locking element, which locking element projects towards a plane containing the upper side of said first floorboard and which locking element has a locking surface for coaction with said locking groove, and for vertical joining of the first joint edge and the second joint edge, a tongue on the second floorboard which at least partly projects and extends from the vertical joint plane and, a tongue groove in the first floorboard adapted to coact with said tongue, the first and second floorboards having coacting upper and coacting lower contact surfaces, the upper coacting contact surfaces comprise surface portions in said tongue groove and said tongue, the upper and lower contact surfaces are essentially plane-parallel and extend essentially parallel with a plane containing the upper side of the floorboards, and the upper edge of the locking element, which upper edge is closest to a plane containing the upper side of the floorboards, is located in a horizontal plane, which horizontal plane is positioned between the upper and the lower contact surfaces but closer to the lower contact surfaces than to the upper contact surfaces, wherein the relationship T−(P1+0.3 * P2)>P3, where T=thickness of the floorboard, P1=distance between the upper side of the floorboard and said upper contact surface, measured in the thickness direction of the floorboard, P2=distance between said upper and lower contact surfaces measured in the thickness direction of the floorboard, and P3 distance between the upper edge of the locking element closest to the upper side of the floorboard and the underside of the floorboard, wherein there is a gap between the side of the locking element furthest away from the joint plane and the edge of the locking groove furthest away from the joint plane.
  • 35. A locking floorboard system for mechanical joining of floorboards, each of the floorboards having a body and an upper side of the body and a balancing layer on a rear side of the body, said system comprising:a first floorboard; a second floorboard; for horizontal joining of a first joint edge of the first floorboard to a second joint edge of the second floorboard at a vertical joint plane, a locking groove which is formed in an underside of said second floorboard and extending parallel with and at a distance from said vertical joint plane at said second joint edge and, a strip integrally formed with the body of said first floorboard, which strip at said first joint edge projects from said vertical joint plane and supports a locking element, which locking element projects towards a plane containing the upper side of said first floorboard and which locking element has a locking surface for coaction with said locking groove, and for vertical joining of the first joint edge and the second joint edge, a tongue on the second floorboard which at least partly projects and extends from the vertical joint plane and, a tongue groove in the first floorboard adapted to coact with said tongue, the first and second floorboards having coacting upper and coacting lower contact surfaces, the upper coacting contact surfaces comprise surface portions in said tongue groove and said tongue, the upper and lower contact surfaces are essentially plane-parallel and extend essentially parallel with a plane containing the upper side of the floorboards, and the upper edge of the locking element, which upper edge is closest to a plane containing the upper side of the floorboards, is located in a horizontal plane, which horizontal plane is positioned between the upper and the lower contact surfaces but closer to the lower contact surfaces than to the upper contact surfaces. wherein the relationship T−(P1+0.3 * P2)>P3, where T=thickness of the floorboard, P1=distance between the upper side of the floorboard and said upper contact surface, measured in the thickness direction of the floorboard, P2=distance between said upper and lower contact surfaces measured in the thickness direction of the floorboard, and P3=distance between the upper edge of the locking element closest to the upper side of the floorboard and the underside of the floorboard, wherein the locking element has an operative locking surface for coaction with a corresponding operative locking surface of the locking groove, and that these operative locking surfaces are inclined at such an angle relative to a plane containing the underside of the floorboard that the locking surfaces extend essentially tangentially relative to a circular arc with it centre where the vertical joint plane intersects the upper side of the floorboard, seen in a section perpendicular to said joint plane and perpendicular to the floorboards.
  • 36. A locking floorboard system for mechanical joining of floorboards, each of the floorboards having a body and an upper side of the body and a lower side of the body, said system comprising:a first floorboard; a second floorboard; for horizontal joining of a first joint edge of the first floorboard to a second joint edge of the second floorboard at a vertical joint plane, a locking groove which is formed in an underside of said second floorboard and extending parallel with and at a distance from said vertical joint plane at said second joint edge and, a strip formed with the body of said first floorboard, which strip at said first joint edge projects from said vertical joint plane and supports a locking element, which locking element projects towards a plane containing the upper side of said first floorboard and which locking element has a locking surface for coaction with said locking groove, wherein the strip is formed in one piece with the body of the first floorboard and for vertical joining of the first joint edge and the second joint edge, a tongue on the second floorboard which at least partly projects and extends from the vertical joint plane and, a tongue groove in the first floorboard adapted to coact with said tongue, the first and second floorboards having coacting upper and coacting lower contact surfaces, the upper coacting contact surfaces comprise surface portions in said tongue groove and said tongue, the upper and lower contact surfaces are essentially plane-parallel and extend essentially parallel with a plane containing the upper side of the floorboards, and the upper edge of the locking element, which upper edge is closest to a plane containing the upper side of the floorboards, is located in a horizontal plane, which horizontal plane is positioned between the upper and the lower contact surfaces but closer to the lower contact surfaces than to the upper contact surfaces.
  • 37. A method for making floorboards with a locking system for mechanical joining of two adjoining floorboards, which have a body and an upper side of the body and a lower side of the body, in which method the floorboards, by chip-removing working, are formed with a locking system, whichfor horizontal joining of a first and a second joint edge of a first and a second floorboard at a vertical joint plane, comprises a locking groove formed in the underside of said second board and extending parallel with and at a distance from said vertical joint plane at said second joint edge and, a strip formed with the body of said first board and at said first joint edge projecting from said vertical joint plane and supporting a locking element, which projects towards a plane containing the upper side of said first floorboard and having a locking surface for coaction with said locking groove, and for vertical joining of the first and second joint edge of the first and second floorboards, comprises a tongue which projects from said second joint edge and the upper part of which extends from said vertical joint plane and, a tongue groove intended for coaction with said tongue, said first and second floorboards having cooperating upper and cooperating lower contact surfaces which are essentially plane-parallel and extend essentially parallel with a plane containing the upper side of said floorboards, of which at least the upper contact surfaces comprise surface portions in said tongue groove and said tongue, in which method the chip-removing working is carried out by chip-removing milling or grinding tools being brought into chip-removing contact with parts of said first and second joint edges of the floorboard for forming said locking groove, said strip, said locking element, said tongue, said tongue groove and said upper and lower contact surfaces, wherein parts of said tongue groove and at least parts of the lower contact surface are formed by means of a chip-removing tool, whose chip-removing surface portions are brought into removing contact with the first joint portion and are directed obliquely inwards and past said joint plane and the upper contact surface and parts of the tongue groove are formed by means of a chip-removing tool, whose chip-removing surface portions are brought into removing engagement with the first joint portion in a plane which is essentially parallel with a plane containing the upper side of the floorboard.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
0000200 Jan 2000 SE
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/SE01/00125 filed on Jan. 24, 2001, which International Application was published by the International Bureau in English on Jul. 26, 2001. The entire contents of PCT/SE01/00125 are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (133)
Number Name Date Kind
213740 Conner Apr 1879 A
714987 Wolfe Dec 1902 A
753791 Fulghum Mar 1904 A
1124228 Houston Jan 1915 A
1407679 Ruthrauff Feb 1922 A
1454250 Parsons May 1923 A
1468288 Een Sep 1923 A
1477813 Daniels et al. Dec 1923 A
1510924 Daniels et al. Oct 1924 A
1540128 Houston Jun 1925 A
1575821 Daniels Mar 1926 A
1602256 Sellin Oct 1926 A
1602267 Karwisch Oct 1926 A
1615096 Meyers Jan 1927 A
1622103 Fulton Mar 1927 A
1622104 Fulton Mar 1927 A
1637634 Carter Aug 1927 A
1644710 Crooks Oct 1927 A
1660480 Daniels Feb 1928 A
1714738 Smith May 1929 A
1718702 Pfiester Jun 1929 A
1734826 Pick Nov 1929 A
1764331 Moratz Jun 1930 A
1778069 Fetz Oct 1930 A
1787027 Wasleff Dec 1930 A
1823039 Gruner Sep 1931 A
1859667 Gruner May 1932 A
1898364 Gynn Feb 1933 A
1906411 Potvin May 1933 A
1929871 Jones Oct 1933 A
1940377 Storm Dec 1933 A
1953306 Moratz Apr 1934 A
1986739 Mitte Jan 1935 A
1988201 Hall Jan 1935 A
2276071 Scull Mar 1942 A
2324628 Kähr Jul 1943 A
2398632 Frost et al. Apr 1946 A
2430200 Wilson Nov 1947 A
2740167 Rowley Apr 1956 A
2780253 Joa Feb 1957 A
2894292 Gramelspacher Jul 1959 A
3045294 Livezey, Jr. Jul 1962 A
3100556 De Ridder Aug 1963 A
3125138 Bolenbach Mar 1964 A
3182769 De Ridder May 1965 A
3203149 Soddy Aug 1965 A
3267630 Omholt Aug 1966 A
3282010 King, Jr. Nov 1966 A
3310919 Bue et al. Mar 1967 A
3347048 Brown et al. Oct 1967 A
3387422 Wanzer Jun 1968 A
3460304 Braeuninger et al. Aug 1969 A
3481810 Waite Dec 1969 A
3526420 Brancalcone Sep 1970 A
3538665 Gohner Nov 1970 A
3553919 Omholt Jan 1971 A
3555762 Costanzo, Jr. Jan 1971 A
3694983 Couquet Oct 1972 A
3714747 Curran Feb 1973 A
3731445 Hoffmann et al. May 1973 A
3759007 Thiele Sep 1973 A
3768846 Hensley et al. Oct 1973 A
3859000 Webster Jan 1975 A
3902293 Witt et al. Sep 1975 A
3908053 Hettich Sep 1975 A
3936551 Elmendorf et al. Feb 1976 A
3988187 Witt et al. Oct 1976 A
4090338 Bourgade May 1978 A
4099358 Compaan Jul 1978 A
4169688 Toshio Oct 1979 A
4242390 Nemeth Dec 1980 A
4299070 Oltmanns et al. Nov 1981 A
4426820 Terbrack et al. Jan 1984 A
4471012 Maxwell Sep 1984 A
4501102 Knowles Feb 1985 A
4561233 Harter et al. Dec 1985 A
4612745 Hovde Sep 1986 A
4641469 Wood Feb 1987 A
4653242 Ezard Mar 1987 A
4703597 Eggemar Nov 1987 A
4715162 Brightwell Dec 1987 A
4738071 Ezard Apr 1988 A
4769963 Meyerson Sep 1988 A
4819932 Trotter, Jr. Apr 1989 A
4831806 Niese et al. May 1989 A
4845907 Meek Jul 1989 A
4905442 Daniels Mar 1990 A
5029425 Bogataj Jul 1991 A
5113632 Hanson May 1992 A
5117603 Weintraub Jun 1992 A
5165816 Parasin Nov 1992 A
5179812 Hill Jan 1993 A
5216861 Meyerson Jun 1993 A
5253464 Nilsen Oct 1993 A
5271564 Smith Dec 1993 A
5295341 Kajiwara Mar 1994 A
5349796 Meyerson Sep 1994 A
5390457 Sjölander Feb 1995 A
5433806 Pasquali et al. Jul 1995 A
5474831 Nystrom Dec 1995 A
5497589 Porter Mar 1996 A
5502939 Zadok et al. Apr 1996 A
5540025 Takehara et al. Jul 1996 A
5567497 Zegler et al. Oct 1996 A
5570554 Searer Nov 1996 A
5597024 Bolyard et al. Jan 1997 A
5630304 Austin May 1997 A
5671575 Wu Sep 1997 A
5706621 Pervan Jan 1998 A
5768850 Chen Jun 1998 A
5797237 Finkell, Jr. Aug 1998 A
5823240 Bolyard et al. Oct 1998 A
5827592 Van Gulik et al. Oct 1998 A
5860267 Pervan Jan 1999 A
5935668 Smith Aug 1999 A
5943239 Shamblin et al. Aug 1999 A
5968625 Hudson Oct 1999 A
5987839 Hamar et al. Nov 1999 A
6006486 Moriau et al. Dec 1999 A
6094882 Pervan Aug 2000 A
6101778 Martensson Aug 2000 A
6119423 Costantino Sep 2000 A
6134854 Stanchfield Oct 2000 A
6148884 Bolyard et al. Nov 2000 A
6182410 Pervan Feb 2001 B1
6205639 Pervan Mar 2001 B1
6209278 Tychsen Apr 2001 B1
6216403 Belbeoc'h Apr 2001 B1
6216409 Roy et al. Apr 2001 B1
6324803 Pervan Dec 2001 B1
20010034992 Pletzer et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020020127 Thiers et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020046528 Pervan et al. Apr 2002 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (126)
Number Date Country
713628 Jan 1998 AU
200020703 Jun 2000 AU
417526 Sep 1936 BE
0557844 Jun 1957 BE
1010339 Jun 1998 BE
1010487 Oct 1998 BE
0991373 Jun 1976 CA
2226286 Dec 1997 CA
2252791 May 1999 CA
2289309 Jul 2000 CA
200949 Jan 1939 CH
211877 Jan 1941 CH
1 212 275 Mar 1966 DE
7102476 Jan 1971 DE
1534278 Nov 1971 DE
7402354 Jan 1974 DE
2 238 660 Feb 1974 DE
2 252 643 May 1974 DE
2502992 Jul 1976 DE
2616077 Oct 1977 DE
2917025 Nov 1980 DE
30 41781 Jun 1982 DE
32 14 207 Nov 1982 DE
32 46 376 Jun 1984 DE
3343601 Jun 1985 DE
8604004 Jun 1986 DE
3512204 Oct 1986 DE
3544845 Jun 1987 DE
40 02 547 Aug 1991 DE
4134452 Apr 1993 DE
4215273 Nov 1993 DE
4242530 Jun 1994 DE
29710175 Sep 1997 DE
19651149 Jun 1998 DE
196 51 149 Jun 1998 DE
197 09 641 Sep 1998 DE
200 01 225 Aug 2000 DE
199 25 248 Dec 2000 DE
200 17 461 Mar 2001 DE
200 18 284 Mar 2001 DE
0248127 Dec 1987 EP
0 623 724 Nov 1994 EP
0652340 May 1995 EP
0 690 185 Jan 1996 EP
0698162 Feb 1996 EP
0843763 May 1998 EP
0849416 Jun 1998 EP
0855482 Jul 1998 EP
0877130 Nov 1998 EP
0958441 Nov 1998 EP
0903451 Mar 1999 EP
0969163 Jan 2000 EP
0969163 Jan 2000 EP
0969164 Jan 2000 EP
0969164 Jan 2000 EP
0974713 Jan 2000 EP
843060 Aug 1984 FI
1293043 Apr 1962 FR
2 568 295 Jan 1986 FR
2630149 Oct 1989 FR
2 637 932 Apr 1990 FR
2675174 Oct 1992 FR
2691491 Nov 1993 FR
2 697 275 Apr 1994 FR
2 712 329 May 1995 FR
2 781 513 Jan 2000 FR
2 785 633 May 2000 FR
424057 Feb 1935 GB
585205 Jan 1947 GB
599793 Mar 1948 GB
636423 Apr 1950 GB
812671 Apr 1959 GB
1127915 Oct 1968 GB
1237744 Jun 1971 GB
1275511 May 1972 GB
1430423 Mar 1976 GB
2117813 Oct 1983 GB
2 126 106 Mar 1984 GB
2243381 Oct 1991 GB
2256023 Nov 1992 GB
2256023 Nov 1992 GB
54-65528 May 1979 JP
57-119056 Jul 1982 JP
3-169967 Jul 1991 JP
5-148984 Jun 1993 JP
6-56310 May 1994 JP
6-146553 May 1994 JP
6-320510 Nov 1994 JP
7-076923 Mar 1995 JP
7-180333 Jul 1995 JP
7-300979 Nov 1995 JP
7-310426 Nov 1995 JP
7601773 Aug 1976 NL
157871 Jul 1984 NO
305614 May 1995 NO
24931 Nov 1974 PL
372 051 May 1973 SE
450 141 Jun 1984 SE
512290 Dec 1990 SE
501 014 Oct 1994 SE
502994 Mar 1996 SE
506 254 Nov 1997 SE
509059 Jun 1998 SE
509060 Jun 1998 SE
512313 Dec 1999 SE
0000200-6 Jul 2001 SE
363795 Nov 1973 SU
WO 8402155 Jun 1984 WO
WO8703839 Jul 1987 WO
WO 9217657 Oct 1992 WO
WO 9313280 Jul 1993 WO
WO 9401628 Jan 1994 WO
WO 9426999 Nov 1994 WO
WO 9627719 Sep 1996 WO
WO 9627721 Sep 1996 WO
WO9630177 Oct 1996 WO
WO 9747834 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9824994 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9824995 Jun 1998 WO
WO9838401 Sep 1998 WO
WO9940273 Aug 1999 WO
WO 9966151 Dec 1999 WO
WO9966151 Dec 1999 WO
WO 9966152 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0006854 Jan 2000 WO
WO0066856 Nov 2000 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (39)
Entry
Träindustrins Handbook “Snickeriarbete”, 2nd Edition, Malmö 1952, pp. 826, 827, 854, and 855, published by Teknografiska Aktiebolaget, Sweden.
“Träbearbetning”, Anders Grönlund, 1986, ISBN 91-970513-2-2, pp. 357-360, published by Institute for Trateknisk Forskning, Stockholm, Sweden.
Drawing Figure 25/6107 from Buetec Gmbh dated Dec. 16, 1985.
Pamphlet from Serexhe for Compact-Praxis, entitled “Selbst Teppichböden, PVC und Parkett verlegen”, Published by Compact Verlag, München, Germany 1985, pp. 84-87.
Pamphlet from Junckers Industrser A/S entitled “B0jlesystemet til Junckers bøliggulve” Oct. 1994, , Published by Junckers Industrser A/S, Denmark.
Pamphlet from Junckers Industrser A/S entitled “The Clip System for Junckers Sports Floors”, Annex 7, 1994, Published by Junckers Industrser A/S, Denmark.
Pamphlet from Junckers Industrser A/S entitled “The Clip System for Junckers Domestic Floors”, Annex 8, 1994, Published by Junckers Industrser A/S, Denmark.
Fibo-Trespo Alloc System Brochure entitled “Opplæring OG Autorisasjon”, pp. 1-29, Fibo-Trespo.
“Revolution bei der Laminatboden-Verl”, boden wand decke, vol. No. 11 of 14, Jan. 10, 1997, p. 166.
Kährs Focus Extra dated Jan. 2001, pp. 1-9.
Brochure for CLIC Laminate Flooring, Art.-Nr. 110 11 640.
Brochure for Laminat-Boden “Clever-Click”, Parador® Wohnsysteme.
Brochure for PERGO®, CLIC Laminate Flooring, and Prime Laminate Flooring from Bauhaus, The Home Store, Malmö, Sweden.
Webster's Dictionary, Random House: New York (1987), p. 862.
Knight's American Mechanical Dictionary, Hurd and Houghton: New York (1876), p. 2051.
Opposition EP 0.698,162 B1—Facts-Grounds-Arguments, dated Apr. 1, 1999, pp. 1-56.
Opposition II EP 0.698,162 B1—Facts-Grounds-Arguments, dated Apr. 30, 1999, (17 pages)—with translation (11 pages).
Opposition I: Unilin Decor N.V./Välinge Aluminum AB, communication dated Jun. 8, 1999 to European Patent Office, pp. 1-2.
Opposition I: Unilin Decor N.V./Välinge Aluminum AB, communication dated Jun. 16, 1999 to European Patent Office, pp. 1-2.
FI Office Action dated Mar. 19, 1998.
NO Office Action dated Dec. 22, 1997.
NO Office Action dated Sep. 21, 1998.
Opposition EP 0.877.130 B1—Arguments, dated Jun. 28, 2000, pp. 1-13.
RU Application Examiner Letter dated Sep. 26, 1997.
NZ Application Examiner Letter dated Oct. 21, 1999.
Välinge, Fibo-Trespo Brochure, Distributed at the Domotex Fair In Hannover, Germany, Jan. 1996.
Pergo, Inc. v. Välinge Aluminium AB, Berry Finance NV, and Alloc, Inc.; U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; Civil Action No. 1:00CV01618.
Alloc, Inc. v. Unilin Decor NV and BHK of America, Inc.; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin; Civil Action No. 00-C-0999.
Unilin Beheer B.V., Unilin Decor, N.V., and BHK of America, Inc. v. Välinge Aluminium AB; U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; Civil Action No. 1:00CV01823.
Alloc, Inc., Berry Finance NV, and Välinge Aluminium AB v. Unilin Decor NV, BHK of America, Inc., Pergo, Inc., Meister-Leisten Schulte GmbH, Akzenta Paneele+Profile GmbH, Tarkett, Inc., and Roysol; ITC No. 337-TA-443 (Docket No. 2154) Filed Dec. 4, 2000.
Alloc, Inc., Berry Finance NV, and Välinge Aluminium AB v. Tarkett, Inc.; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin; Civil Action No. 00-CV-1377.
European prosecution file history to grant, European Patent No. 94915725.9—2303/0698162, grant date Sep. 16, 1998.
European prosecution file history to grant, European Patent No. 98106535.2-2303/0855482, grant date Dec. 1, 1999.
European prosecution file history to grant, European Patent No. 98201555.4-2303/0877130, grant date Jan. 26, 2000.
Communication of Notices of Intervention by E.F.P. Floor Products dated Mar. 17, 2000 in European Patent Application 0698162, pp. 1-11 with annex pp. 1-21.
Response to the E.F.P. Floor Products intervention dated Jun. 28, 2000, pp. 1-5.
Letters from the Opponent dated Jul. 26, 2001 and Jul. 30, 2001 including Annexes 1 to 3.
Communication from European Patent Office dated Sep. 20, 2001 in European Patent No. 0698162, pp. 1-2 with Facts and Submissions Annex pp. 1-18, Minutes Annex pp. 1-11, and Annex I to VI.
Communication from Swedish Patent Office dated Sep. 21, 2001 in Swedish Patent No. 9801986-2, pp. 1-3 in Swedish with forwarding letter dated Sep. 24, 2001 in English.
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent PCT/SE01/00125 Jan 2001 US
Child 09/954066 US