The invention generally relates to the field of mechanical locking of floorboards. The invention relates to an improved locking system for mechanical locking of floorboards, a floorboard provided with such an improved locking system, a flooring made of such mechanically joined floorboards, and a method for making such floorboards. The invention generally relates to an improvement of a locking system of the type described and shown in WO 94/26999 and WO 99/66151.
More specifically, the invention relates to a locking system for mechanical joining of floorboards of the type having a body and preferably a surface layer on the upper side of the body and a balancing layer on the rear side of the body, said locking system comprising: (i) for horizontal joining of a first and a second joint edge portion of a first and a second floorboard respectively at a vertical joint plane, on the one hand a locking groove which is formed in the underside of said second board and extends parallel with and at a distance from said vertical joint plane at said second joint edge and, on the other hand, a strip integrally formed with the body of said first board, which strip at said first joint edge projects from said vertical joint plane and supports a locking element, which projects towards a plane containing the upper side of said first floorboard and which has a locking surface for coaction with said locking groove, and (ii) for vertical joining of the first and second joint edge, on the one hand a tongue which at least partly projects and extends from the joint plane and, on the other hand, a tongue groove adapted to coact with said tongue, the first and second floorboards within their joint edge portions for the vertical joining having coacting upper and coacting lower contact surfaces, of which at least the upper comprise surface portions in said tongue groove and said tongue.
The present invention is particularly suitable for mechanical joining of thin floating floorboards made up of an upper surface layer, an intermediate fibreboard body and a lower balancing layer, such as laminate flooring and veneer flooring with a fibreboard body. Therefore, the following description of the state of the art, problems associated with known systems, and the objects and features of the invention will, as a non-restricting example, focus on this field of application and, in particular, on rectangular floorboards with dimensions of about 1.2 m*0.2 m and a thickness of about 7-10 mm, intended to be mechanically joined at the long side as well as the short side.
Thin laminate flooring and wood veneer flooring are usually composed of a body consisting of a 6-9 mm fibreboard, a 0.20-0.8 mm thick upper surface layer and a 0.1-0.6 mm thick lower balancing layer. The surface layer provides appearance and durability to the floorboards. The body provides stability and the balancing layer keeps the board level when the relative humidity (RH) varies during the year. The RH can vary between 15% and 90%. Conventional floorboards of the type are usually joined by means of glued tongue-and-groove joints (i.e. joints involving a tongue on a floorboard and a tongue groove on an adjoining floorboard) at the long and short sides. When laying the floor, the boards are brought together horizontally, whereby a projecting tongue along the joint edge of a first board is introduced into a tongue groove along the joint edge of the second adjoining board. The same method is used at the long side as well as the short side. The tongue and the tongue groove are designed for such horizontal joining only and with special regard to how glue pockets and gluing surfaces should be designed to enable the tongue to be efficiently glued within the tongue groove. The tongue-and-groove joint presents coacting upper and lower contact surfaces that position the boards vertically in order to ensure a level surface of the finished floor.
In addition to such conventional floors, which are connected by means of glued tongue-and-groove joints, floorboards have recently been developed which are instead mechanically joined and which do not require the use of glue. This type of mechanical joint system is hereinafter referred to as a “strip-lock system”, since the most characteristic component of this system is a projecting strip which supports a locking element.
WO 94/26999 and WO88/66151 (owner Välinge Aluminium AB) disclose a strip-lock system for joining building panels, particularly floorboards. This locking system allows the boards to be locked mechanically at right angles to as well as parallel with the principal plane of the boards at the long side as well as at the short side. Methods for making such floorboards are disclosed in EP 0958441 and EP 0958442 (owner Välinge Aluminium AB). The basic principles of the design and the installation of the floorboards, as well as the methods for making the same, as described in the four above-mentioned documents are usable for the present invention as well, and therefore these documents are hereby incorporated by reference.
In order to facilitate the understanding and description of the present invention, as well as the comprehension of the problems underlying the invention, a brief description of the basic design and function of the known floorboards according to the above-mentioned WO 94/26999 and WO 99/66151 will be given below with reference to
a and 3b are thus a top view and a bottom view respectively of a known floorboard 1. The board 1 is rectangular with a top side 2, an underside 3, two opposite long sides 4a, 4b forming joint edge portions and two opposite short sides 5a, 5b forming joint edge portions.
Without the use of the glue, both the long sides 4a, 4b and the short sides 5a, 5b can be joined mechanically in a direction D2 in
Moreover, for mechanical joining of both long sides and short sides also in the vertical direction (direction D1 in
a-1c show how two long sides 4a, 4b of two such boards 1, 1′ on an underlay 12 can be joined together by means of downward angling.
When a new board 1′ and a previously installed board 1 are to be joined together along their long sides 4a, 4b as shown in
a-2c show how the short sides 5a and 5b of the boards 1, 1′ can be mechanically joined in the direction D1 as well as the direction D2 by moving the new board 1′ towards the previously installed board 1 essentially horizontally. Specifically, this can be carried out subsequent to joining the long side of the new board 1′ to a previously installed board 1 in an adjoining row by means of the method according to
By repeating the steps shown in
For optimal function, subsequent to being joined together, the boards should be capable of assuming a position along their long sides in which a small play can exist between the operative locking surface 10 of the locking element and the operative locking surface 10′ of the locking groove 14. Reference is made to WO 94/26999 for a more detailed description of this play.
In addition to what is known from the above-mentioned patent specifications, a licensee of Välinge Aluminium AB, Norske Skog Flooring AS, Norway (NSF), introduced a laminated floor with mechanical joining according to WO 94/26999 in January 1996 in connection with the Domotex trade fair in Hannover, Germany. This laminated floor, which is marketed under the trademark Alloc®, is 7.2 mm thick and has a 0.6-mm aluminium strip 6 which is mechanically attached on the tongue side. The operative locking surface 10 of the locking element 8 has an inclination (hereinafter termed locking angle) of about 80° to the plane of the board. The vertical connection is designed as a modified tongue-and-groove joint, the term “modified” referring to the possibility of bringing the tongue groove and tongue together by way of angling.
WO 97/47834 (owner Unilin Beeher B. V. , the Netherlands) describes a strip-lock system which has a fibreboard strip and is essentially based on the above known principles. In the corresponding product, “Uniclic®”, which this owner began marketing in the latter part of 1997, one seeks to achieve biasing of the boards. This results in high friction and makes it difficult to angle the boards together and to displace them. The document shows several embodiments of the locking system. The “Uniclic®” product is shown in section in
Other known locking systems for mechanical joining of board materials are described in, for example, GB-A-2,256,023 showing unilateral mechanical joining for providing an expansion joint in a wood panel for outdoor use, and in U.S. Pat. No. 4,426,820 (shown in
In the autumn of 1998, NSF introduced a 7.2-mm laminated floor with a strip-lock system which comprises a fibreboard strip and is manufactured according to WO 94/26999 and WO 99/66151. This laminated floor is marketed under the trademark “Fiboloc®” and has the cross-section illustrated in
In January 1999, Kronotex GmbH, Germany, introduced a 7.8 mm thick laminated floor with a strip lock under the trademark “Isilock®”. A cross-section of the joint edge portion of this system is shown in
During 1999, the mechanical joint system has obtained a strong position on the world market, and some twenty manufacturers have shown, in January 2000, different types of systems which essentially are variants of Fiboloc®, Uniclic® and Isilock®.
Although the floor according to WO 94/26999 and WO 99/66151 and the floor sold under the trademark Fiboloc® exhibit major advantages in comparison with traditional, glued floors, further improvements are desirable mainly in thin floor structures.
The joint system consists of three parts. An upper part P1 which takes up the load on the floor surface in the joint. An intermediate part P2 that is necessary for forming the vertical joint in the D1 direction in the form of tongue and tongue groove. A lower part P3 which is necessary for forming the horizontal lock in the D2 direction with strip and locking element.
In thin floorboards, it is difficult to provide, with prior-art technique, a joint system which at the same time has a sufficiently high and stable upper part, a thick, strong and rigid tongue and a sufficiently thick strip with a high locking element. Nor does a joint system according to
At present there are no known products or methods which afford satisfactory solutions to problems that are related to thin floorboards with mechanical joint systems. It has been necessary to choose compromises which (i) either result in a thin tongue and sufficient material thickness in the joint edge portion above the corresponding tongue groove in spite of plane-parallel contact surfaces or (ii) use upper and lower contact surfaces angled to each other and downwardly extending projections and corresponding recesses in the tongue and the tongue groove respectively of adjoining floorboards or (iii) result in a thin and mechanically weak locking strip with a locking element of a small height.
Therefore an object of the present invention is to obviate this and other drawbacks of prior art. Another object of the invention is to provide a locking system, a floorboard, and a method for making a floorboard having such a locking system, in which it is at the same time possible to obtain
To achieve these criteria simultaneously, it is necessary to take the conditions into consideration which are present in the manufacture of floorboards with mechanical locking systems. The problems arise mainly when laminate-type thin floorboards are involved, but the problems exist in all types of thin floorboards. The three contradictory criteria will be discussed separately in the following.
(i) Tongue-and-Groove Joint
If the floor is thin there is not sufficient material for making a tongue groove and a tongue of sufficient thickness for the intended properties to be obtained. The thin tongue will be sensitive to laying damage, and the strength of the floor in the vertical direction will be insufficient. If one tries to improve the properties by making the contact surfaces between tongue and tongue groove oblique instead of parallel with the upper side of the floorboard, the working tools must during working be kept extremely accurately positioned both vertically and horizontally relative to the floorboard that is being made. This means that the manufacture will be significantly more difficult, and that it will be difficult to obtain optimal and accurate fitting between tongue and tongue groove. The tolerances in manufacture must be such that a fitting of a few hundredths of a millimeter is obtained since otherwise it will be difficult or impossible to displace the floorboards parallel with the joint edge in connection with the laying of the floorboards.
(ii) Material Portion above the Tongue Groove
In a mechanical locking system glue is not used to keep tongue and tongue groove together in the laid floor. At a low relative humidity the surface layer of the floorboards shrinks, and the material portion that is located above the tongue groove and consequently has no balancing layer on its underside, can in consequence be bent upwards if this material portion is thin. Upwards bending of this material portion may result in a vertical displacement between the surface layers of adjoining floorboards in the area of the joint and causes an increased risk of wear and damage to the joint edge. To reduce the risk of upwards bending, it is therefore necessary to strive to obtain as thick a material portion as possible above the tongue groove. With known geometric designs of locking systems for mechanical joining of floorboards, it is then necessary to reduce the thickness of the tongue and tongue groove in the vertical direction of the floorboard if at the same time efficient manufacture with high and exact tolerances is to be carried out. A reduced thickness of tongue and tongue groove, however, results in, inter alia, the drawbacks that the strength of the joint perpendicular to the plane of the laid floor is reduced and that the risk of damage caused during laying increases.
(iii) Strip and Locking Element
The strip and the locking element are formed in the lower portion of the floorboard. If the total thickness of a thin floorboard is to be retained and at the same time a thick material portion above the locking groove is desirable, and locking element and strip are to be formed merely in that part of the floorboard which is positioned below the tongue groove, the possibilities of providing a strip having a locking element with a sufficiently high locking surface and upper guiding part will be restricted in an undesirable manner. The strip closest to the joint plane and the lower part of the tongue groove can be too thick and rigid and this makes the locking by snap action by backwards bending of the strip difficult. If at the same time the material thickness of the strip is reduced and a large part of the lower contact surface is retained in the tongue groove, this results on the other hand in a risk that the floorboard will be damaged while being laid or subsequently removed.
A problem that is also to be taken into consideration in the manufacture of floorboards, in which the components of the locking system—tongue/tongue groove and strip with a locking element engaging a locking groove—are to be made by working the edge portions of a board-shaped starting material, is that it must be possible to guide the tools in an easy way and position them correctly and with an extremely high degree of accuracy in relation to the board-shaped starting material. Guiding of a chip-removing tool in more than one direction means restrictions in the manufacture and also causes a great risk of reduced manufacturing tolerances and, thus, a poorer function of the finished floorboards.
To sum up, there is a great need for providing a locking system which takes the above-mentioned requirements, problems and desiderata into consideration to a greater extent than prior art. The invention aims at satisfying this need.
These and other objects of the invention are achieved by a locking system, a floorboard, a floor and a manufacturing method having the features stated in the independent claims. The dependent claims define particularly preferred embodiments of the invention.
The invention is based on a first understanding that the identified problems must essentially be solved with a locking system where the lower contact surface of the tongue groove is displaced downwards and past the upper part of the locking element.
The invention is also based on a second understanding which is related to the manufacturing technique, viz. that the tongue groove must be designed in such manner that it can be manufactured rationally and with extremely high precision using large milling tools which are normally used in floor manufacture and which, during their displacement relative to the joint edge portions of the floorboard that is to be made, need be guided in one direction only to provide the parallel contact surfaces while the tool is displaced along the joint edge portion of the floorboard material (or alternatively the joint edge portion is displaced relative to the tool). In known designs of the joint edge portions, such working requires in most cases guiding in two directions while at the same time a relative displacement of tool and floorboard material takes place.
According to a first aspect of the invention, a locking system is provided of the type which is stated by way of introduction and which according to the invention is characterised by the combination by the combination
According to another aspect of the invention, a new manufacturing method for making strip and tongue groove is provided. According to conventional methods, the tongue groove is always made by means of a single tool. The tongue groove according to the invention is made by means of two tools in two steps where the lower part of the tongue groove and its lower contact surface are made by means of one tool and the upper part of the tongue groove and its upper contact surface are made by means of another tool. The method according to the invention comprises the steps 1) of forming part of the strip, part of the lower part of the tongue groove and the lower contact surface by means of an angled milling tool operating at an angle <90° to the horizontal plane of the floorboard and the strip, and 2) forming the upper part of the tongue groove and the upper contact surface by means of a separate horizontally operating tool.
According to another aspect of the invention, also a method for making a locking system and floorboards of the above type with plane-parallel upper and lower contact surfaces is provided. This method is characterised in
a-c show in three stages a downward angling method for mechanical joining of long sides of floorboards according to WO 94/26999.
a-c show in three stages a snap-action method for mechanical joining of short sides of floorboards according to WO 94/26999.
a-b are a top plan view and a bottom view respectively of a floorboard according to WO 94/26999.
a-4d shows three strip-lock systems available on the market with an integrated strip of fibreboard and a balancing layer, and a strip lock system according to U.S. Pat. No. 4,426,820.
FIGS. 7+8 illustrate an example of a manufacturing method according to the invention for manufacturing a floorboard with a locking system according to the invention.
a-d show variants of a floorboard and a locking system according to the present invention.
Prior to the description of preferred embodiments, with reference to
The cross-sections shown in
In the embodiment shown, the boards 1, 1′ in
To form a vertical lock in the D1 direction, the joint edge portion 4a has a laterally open tongue groove 36 and the opposite joint edge portion 4b has a laterally projecting tongue 38 which in the joined position is received in the tongue groove 36. The upper contact surfaces 43 and the lower contact surfaces 45 of the locking system are also plane and parallel with the plane of the floorboard.
In the joined position according to
As mentioned, the height of the locking element 8 has been retained essentially unchanged compared with prior art according to WO 99/661151 and “Fiboloc®”. This results in the locking effect being retained. The locking angle A of the two cooperating operative locking surfaces 10, 10′ is <90° and preferably in the range 55-85°. Most preferably, the locking surfaces 10, 10′ extend approximately tangentially to a circular arc which has its centre where the joint plane F passes through the upper side of the floorboard. If the guiding portion 9 of the locking element immediately above the locking surface 10 has been slightly rounded, the guiding of the locking element 8 into the locking groove 14 is facilitated in the downward angling of the floorboard 1′ similarly to that shown in
According to a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention, the tongue 38 and the tongue groove 36 are to be positioned eccentrically in the thickness direction of the floorboards and placed closer to the underside than to the upper side of the floorboards.
The most preferred according to the invention is that the locking system and the floorboards satisfy the relationship
T−(P1+0.3*P2)>P3,
where
It has been found advantageous from the viewpoint of strength and function if the locking system also satisfies the relationship P2>P3.
Moreover, it has been found particularly advantageous if the relationship P3>0.3*T is satisfied since this results in more reliable connection of adjoining floorboards.
If the relationship P1>0.3*T is satisfied, the best material thickness is obtained in the material portion between the tongue groove 36 and the upper side 2 of the floorboard. This reduces the risk of this material portion warping so that the superposed surface coating will no longer be in the same plane as the surface coating of an adjoining floorboard.
To ensure great strength of the tongue 38 it is preferred for the dimensions of the tongue to satisfy the relationship P2>0.3*T.
By forming the cooperating portions of the tongue 38 and the tongue groove 36 in such manner that the inner boundary surfaces of the tongue groove in the first floorboard 1 are positioned further away from the vertical joint plane F than the corresponding surfaces of the tongue 38 of the second floorboard 1′ when the first and the second floorboards are mechanically assembled, the insertion of the tongue into the tongue groove is facilitated. At the same time the requirements for exact guiding of the chip-removing tools in the plane of the floorboards are reduced.
Moreover it is preferred for the locking groove 14, seen perpendicular to the joint plane F, to extend further away from the vertical joint plane F than do corresponding portions of the locking element 8, when the first and the second floorboards 1, 1′ are mechanically assembled. This design also facilitates laying and taking up of the floorboards.
In a floor which is laid using boards with a locking system according to the present invention, the first and the second floorboards are identically designed. Moreover it is preferred for the floorboards to be mechanically joinable with adjoining floorboards along all four sides by means of a locking system according to the present invention.
Like in prior-art technique, the floorboard material is first worked to obtain the correct width and the correct length between the upper surface portions 41, 42 of the joint edges 4a, 4b (5a, 5b respectively).
According to the invention, the subsequent chip-removing working then takes place, in contrast to prior-art technique, by chip-removing working in two stages with tools which must be guided with high precision in one direction only (in addition to the displacement direction along the floorboard material).
Manufacturing by means of angled tools is a method known per se, but manufacturing of plane-parallel contact surfaces between tongue and tongue groove in combination with a locking element, whose upper side is positioned in a plane above the lower contact surface of the locking system, is not previously known.
In contrast to prior-art technique the tongue groove 36 is thus made in two distinct stages by using two tools V1, V2. The first chip-removing tool V1 is used to form parts of the tongue groove 38 closest to the underside 3 of the floorboard and at least part of the lower contact surface 45. This tool V1 has chip-removing surface portions which are directed obliquely inwards and past the joint plane F. An embodiment of the chip-removing surface portions of this first tool is shown in FIG. 7. In this case, the tool forms the entire lower contact surface 45, the lower parts of the tongue groove 36 which is to be made, and the operative locking surface portion 10 and guiding surface 9 of the locking element 8. As a result, it will be easier to maintain the necessary tolerances since this tool need be positioned with high precision merely as regards cutting depth (determines the position of the lower contact surface 45 in the thickness direction of the floorboard) and in relation to the intended joint plane F. In this embodiment, this tool therefore forms portions of the tongue groove 36 up to the level of the upper side of the locking element 8. The location of the tool in the vertical direction relative to the floorboard is easy to maintain, and if the location perpendicular to the joint plane F is exactly guided, the operative surface portion 10 of the locking element will be placed exactly at the correct distance from the edge between the joint plane F and the upper side 3 of the floorboard.
The first tool V1 thus forms parts of the tongue groove 36 that is to be made, the strip 6, the lower contact surface 45, the operative locking surface 10 and the guiding part 9 of the locking element 8. Preferably this tool is angled at an angle A to the principal plane of the floorboard, which corresponds to the angle of the locking surface.
It is obvious that this working in the first manufacturing step can take place in several partial steps, where one of the partial steps is the forming of merely the lower parts of the tongue groove and of the lower contact surface 45 outside the joint plane 5 by means of an angled milling tool. The rest of the strip and the locking element can in a subsequent partial step be formed by means of another tool, which can also be angled and inclined correspondingly. The second tool, however, can also be straight and be moved perpendicular downwards in relation to the upper side of the floorboard. Therefore the tool V1 can be divided into two or more partial tools, where the partial tool closest to the joint plane F forms parts of the tongue groove and the entire lower contact surface 45, or parts thereof, while the subsequent partial tool or tools form the rest of the strip 6 and its locking element 8.
In a second manufacturing step, the rest of the tongue groove 38 and the entire contact surface 43 are formed by means of a chip-removing tool V2, whose chip-removing surface portions (shown in
The preferred manufacturing method is most suitable for rotating milling tools, but the joint system can be manufactured in many other ways using a plurality of tools which each operate at different angles and in different planes.
By the forming of the tongue groove being divided into two steps and being carried out using two tools, V1 and V2, it has become possible to position the lower contact surface 45 at a level below the upper side of the locking element. Moreover, this manufacturing method makes it possible to position the tongue and the tongue groove eccentrically in the floorboard and form the tongue and the tongue groove with a greater thickness in the thickness direction of the floorboard than has been possible up to now in the manufacture of floorboards, in which the strip is integrated with and preferably monolithic with the rest of the floorboard. The invention can be used for floorboards where the main portion of the board and the joint edge portions of the board are of the same composition, as well as for floorboards where the joint edge portions are made of another material but are integrated with the board before the chip-removing working to form the different parts of the locking system.
A plurality of variants of the invention are feasible. The joint system can be made with a number of different joint geometries, where some or all of the above parameters are different, especially when the purpose is to prioritise a certain property over the other properties.
The owner has contemplated and tested a number of variants based on that stated above.
The height of the locking element and the angle of the surfaces can be varied. Nor is it necessary for the locking surface of the locking groove and the locking surface of the locking element to have the same inclination. The thickness of the strip may vary over its width perpendicular to the joint plane F, and in particular the strip can be thinner in the vicinity of the locking element. Also the thickness of the board between the joint plane F and the locking groove 14 may vary. The vertical and horizontal joint can be made with a play between all surfaces which are not operative in the locking system, so that the friction in connection with displacement parallel with the joint edge is reduced and so that mounting is thus facilitated. The depth of the tongue groove can be made very small, and also with a tongue groove depth of less than 1 mm, sufficient strength can be achieved with a rigid thick tongue.
a-d show some examples of other embodiments of the invention. Those parts of the tongue groove and the strip which are positioned below the marked horizontal plane H, are preferably made by means of an angled tool (corresponding to the tool V1), while those parts of the tongue groove which are positioned above this horizontal plane are made by means of a horizontally operating tool (corresponding to the tool V2).
a shows an embodiment where the lower contact surface 45 is essentially outside the joint plane F and a very small part of the contact surface is inside the joint plane F. Between the tongue 38 and the locking groove 14 there is a recess 50 in the underside of the tongue. This recess serves to reduce the friction between the tongue and the strip 6 when displacing the adjoining floorboards 1, 1′ along the joint plane F in connection with the laying of the boards.
b shows an embodiment where the lower contact surface 45 is positioned completely outside the joint plane F. For reducing the friction, a recess 51 has in this case been formed in the upper side of the strip 6, while the contact surface 45 of the locking tongue is kept plane. The locking element 8 has been made somewhat lower, which makes the locking system particularly suitable for joining of short sides by snap action. The recess 51 in the strip 6 also reduces the rigidity of the strip and thus facilitates the joining by snap action.
c shows an embodiment with a centrically positioned tongue 38 and a short rigid strip 6 where the lower plane contact surface 45 constitutes the upper side of the strip and is largely positioned outside the joint plane F. Just like in the other embodiments according to the invention, the lower contact surface 45 is positioned in a plane below the upper side of the locking element 8, i.e. below the marked horizontal plane H.
d shows an embodiment with a stable locking system. Locking in the vertical direction (D1 direction) takes place by means of upper and lower contact surfaces 43 and 45 respectively, of which the lower extend merely a short distance from the joint plane F. The portions of the strip outside the lower contact surface 45 up to the locking element have been lowered by forming a recess 53 and therefore they do not make contact with the adjoining floorboard 1′. This means a reduction of the friction when displacing adjoining floorboards in the direction of the joint plane F during the laying of the boards. The example according to
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0000200 | Jan 2000 | SE | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/954,066, filed on Sep. 18, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,510,665 which was a continuation of International Application No. PCT/SE01/00125, filed on Jan. 24, 2001, which International Application was published by the International Bureau in English on Jul. 26, 2001. The entire contents of PCT/SE01/00125 are hereby incorporated herein by reference
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
213740 | Conner | Apr 1879 | A |
714987 | Wolfe | Dec 1902 | A |
753791 | Fulghum | Mar 1904 | A |
1124228 | Houston | Jan 1915 | A |
1371856 | Cade | Mar 1921 | A |
1407679 | Ruthrauff | Feb 1922 | A |
1454250 | Parsons | May 1923 | A |
1468288 | Een | Sep 1923 | A |
1477813 | Daniels et al. | Dec 1923 | A |
1510924 | Daniels et al. | Oct 1924 | A |
1540128 | Houston | Jun 1925 | A |
1575821 | Daniels | Mar 1926 | A |
1602256 | Sellin | Oct 1926 | A |
1602267 | Karwisch | Oct 1926 | A |
1615096 | Meyers | Jan 1927 | A |
1622103 | Fulton | Mar 1927 | A |
1622104 | Fulton | Mar 1927 | A |
1637634 | Carter | Aug 1927 | A |
1644710 | Crooks | Oct 1927 | A |
1660480 | Daniels | Feb 1928 | A |
1714738 | Smith | May 1929 | A |
1718702 | Pfiester | Jun 1929 | A |
1734826 | Pick | Nov 1929 | A |
1764331 | Moratz | Jun 1930 | A |
1778069 | Fetz | Oct 1930 | A |
1787027 | Wasleff | Dec 1930 | A |
1823039 | Gruner | Sep 1931 | A |
1859667 | Gruner | May 1932 | A |
1898364 | Gynn | Feb 1933 | A |
1906411 | Potvin | May 1933 | A |
1929871 | Jones | Oct 1933 | A |
1940377 | Storm | Dec 1933 | A |
1953306 | Moratz | Apr 1934 | A |
1986739 | Mitte | Jan 1935 | A |
1988201 | Hall | Jan 1935 | A |
2044216 | Klages | Jun 1936 | A |
2266464 | Kraft | Dec 1941 | A |
2276071 | Scull | Mar 1942 | A |
2324628 | Kähr | Jul 1943 | A |
2398632 | Frost et al. | Apr 1946 | A |
2430200 | Wilson | Nov 1947 | A |
2740167 | Rowley | Apr 1956 | A |
2780253 | Joa | Feb 1957 | A |
2894292 | Gramelspacher | Jul 1959 | A |
2947040 | Schultz | Aug 1960 | A |
3045294 | Livezey, Jr. | Jul 1962 | A |
3100556 | De Ridder | Aug 1963 | A |
3125138 | Bolenbach | Mar 1964 | A |
3182769 | De Ridder | May 1965 | A |
3203149 | Soddy | Aug 1965 | A |
3267630 | Omholt | Aug 1966 | A |
3282010 | King, Jr. | Nov 1966 | A |
3310919 | Bue et al. | Mar 1967 | A |
3347048 | Brown et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
3387422 | Wanzer | Jun 1968 | A |
3460304 | Braeuninger et al. | Aug 1969 | A |
3481810 | Waite | Dec 1969 | A |
3526420 | Brancalcone | Sep 1970 | A |
3538665 | Gohner | Nov 1970 | A |
3553919 | Omholt | Jan 1971 | A |
3555762 | Costanzo, Jr. | Jan 1971 | A |
3694983 | Couquet | Oct 1972 | A |
3714747 | Curran | Feb 1973 | A |
3731445 | HOffman et al. | May 1973 | A |
3759007 | Thiele | Sep 1973 | A |
3768846 | Hensley et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3786608 | Boettcher | Jan 1974 | A |
3859000 | Webster | Jan 1975 | A |
3902293 | Witt et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3908053 | Hettich | Sep 1975 | A |
3936551 | Elmendorf et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3988187 | Witt et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4037377 | Howell et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4090338 | Bourgade | May 1978 | A |
4099358 | Compaan | Jul 1978 | A |
4100710 | Kowallik | Jul 1978 | A |
4169688 | Toshio | Oct 1979 | A |
4242390 | Nemeth | Dec 1980 | A |
4299070 | Oltmanns et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4426820 | Terbrack et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4471012 | Maxwell | Sep 1984 | A |
4489115 | Layman et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4501102 | Knowles | Feb 1985 | A |
4561233 | Harter et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4612745 | Hovde | Sep 1986 | A |
4641469 | Wood | Feb 1987 | A |
4643237 | Rosa | Feb 1987 | A |
4653242 | Ezard | Mar 1987 | A |
4703597 | Eggemar | Nov 1987 | A |
4715162 | Brightwell | Dec 1987 | A |
4738071 | Ezard | Apr 1988 | A |
4769963 | Meyerson | Sep 1988 | A |
4819932 | Trotter, Jr. | Apr 1989 | A |
4831806 | Niese et al. | May 1989 | A |
4845907 | Meek | Jul 1989 | A |
4905442 | Daniels | Mar 1990 | A |
5029425 | Bogataj | Jul 1991 | A |
5113632 | Hanson | May 1992 | A |
5117603 | Weintraub | Jun 1992 | A |
5148850 | Urbanick | Sep 1992 | A |
5165816 | Parasin | Nov 1992 | A |
5179812 | Hill | Jan 1993 | A |
5216861 | Meyerson | Jun 1993 | A |
5253464 | Nilsen | Oct 1993 | A |
5271564 | Smith | Dec 1993 | A |
5295341 | Kajiwara | Mar 1994 | A |
5349796 | Meyerson | Sep 1994 | A |
5390457 | Sjölander | Feb 1995 | A |
5433806 | Pasquali et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5474831 | Nystrom | Dec 1995 | A |
5497589 | Porter | Mar 1996 | A |
5502939 | Zadok et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5540025 | Takehara et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5567497 | Zegler et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5570554 | Searer | Nov 1996 | A |
5597024 | Bolyard et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5618602 | Nelson | Apr 1997 | A |
5630304 | Austin | May 1997 | A |
5653099 | MacKenzie | Aug 1997 | A |
5671575 | Wu | Sep 1997 | A |
5695875 | Larsson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5706621 | Pervan | Jan 1998 | A |
5768850 | Chen | Jun 1998 | A |
5797237 | Finkell, Jr. | Aug 1998 | A |
5823240 | Bolyard et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827592 | Van Gulik et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5860267 | Pervan | Jan 1999 | A |
5900099 | Sweet et al. | May 1999 | A |
5935668 | Smith | Aug 1999 | A |
5943239 | Shamblin et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5968625 | Hudson | Oct 1999 | A |
5987839 | Hamar et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6006486 | Moriau et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023907 | Pervan | Feb 2000 | A |
6029416 | Andersson | Feb 2000 | A |
6094882 | Pervan | Aug 2000 | A |
6101778 | Martensson | Aug 2000 | A |
6119423 | Costantino | Sep 2000 | A |
6134854 | Stanchfield | Oct 2000 | A |
6148884 | Bolyard et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6173548 | Hamar et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182410 | Pervan | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203653 | Seidner | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205639 | Pervan | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209278 | Tychsen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216403 | Belbeoc'h | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216409 | Roy et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6314701 | Meyerson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324803 | Pervan | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332733 | Hamberger et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6339908 | Chuang | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345481 | Nelson | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6363677 | Chen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385936 | Schneider | May 2002 | B1 |
6397547 | Mårtensson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6421970 | Martensson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438919 | Knauseder | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446405 | Pervan | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6490836 | Moriau et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510665 | Pervan | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6516579 | Pervan | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532709 | Pervan | Mar 2003 | B2 |
20010029720 | Pervan | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020007608 | Pervan | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020031646 | Chen et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020069611 | Leopolder | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095894 | Pervan | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020112433 | Pervan | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020178673 | Pervan | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020178674 | Pervan | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020178682 | Pervan | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009972 | Pervan et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030024199 | Pervan et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030084636 | Pervan | May 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
713628 | Jan 1998 | AU |
200020703 | Jun 2000 | AU |
417526 | Sep 1936 | BE |
0557844 | Jun 1957 | BE |
1010339 | Jun 1998 | BE |
1010487 | Oct 1998 | BE |
0991373 | Jun 1976 | CA |
2226286 | Dec 1997 | CA |
2252791 | May 1999 | CA |
2289309 | Jul 2000 | CA |
200949 | Jan 1939 | CH |
211877 | Jan 1941 | CH |
690 242 | Jun 2000 | CH |
1 212 275 | Mar 1966 | DE |
7102476 | Jan 1971 | DE |
1 534 278 | Nov 1971 | DE |
2 205 232 | Aug 1973 | DE |
7402354 | Jan 1974 | DE |
2 238 660 | Feb 1974 | DE |
2 252 643 | May 1974 | DE |
2 502 992 | Jul 1976 | DE |
2 616 077 | Oct 1977 | DE |
2 917 025 | Nov 1980 | DE |
30 41781 | Jun 1982 | DE |
32 14 207 | Nov 1982 | DE |
32 46 376 | Jun 1984 | DE |
3343601 | Jun 1985 | DE |
35 38 538 | Oct 1985 | DE |
8604004 | Jun 1986 | DE |
3512204 | Oct 1986 | DE |
3544845 | Jun 1987 | DE |
3631390 | Dec 1987 | DE |
40 02 547 | Aug 1991 | DE |
41 30 115 | Sep 1991 | DE |
4134452 | Apr 1993 | DE |
4215273 | Nov 1993 | DE |
4242530 | Jun 1994 | DE |
43 13 037 | Aug 1994 | DE |
93 17 191 | Apr 1995 | DE |
196 01 322 | May 1997 | DE |
296 18 318 | May 1997 | DE |
297 10 175 | Sep 1997 | DE |
196 51 149 | Jun 1998 | DE |
197 09 641 | Sep 1998 | DE |
197 18 319 | Nov 1998 | DE |
197 18 812 | Nov 1998 | DE |
200 01 225 | Aug 2000 | DE |
200 02 744 | Sep 2000 | DE |
199 25 248 | Dec 2000 | DE |
200 17 461 | Mar 2001 | DE |
200 18 284 | Mar 2001 | DE |
100 32 204 | Jul 2001 | DE |
0 248 127 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0 623 724 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0 652 340 | May 1995 | EP |
0 690 185 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0 698 162 | Feb 1996 | EP |
0 843 763 | May 1998 | EP |
0 849 416 | Jun 1998 | EP |
0 855 482 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0 877 130 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0 958 441 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0 903 451 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0 969 163 | Jan 2000 | EP |
0 969 163 | Jan 2000 | EP |
0 969 164 | Jan 2000 | EP |
0 969 164 | Jan 2000 | EP |
0 974 713 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1 048 423 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1 251 219 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1 120 515 | Aug 2001 | EP |
843060 | Aug 1984 | FI |
1 293 043 | Apr 1962 | FR |
2 568 295 | Jan 1986 | FR |
2 630 149 | Oct 1989 | FR |
2 637 932 | Apr 1990 | FR |
2 675 174 | Oct 1992 | FR |
2 691 491 | Nov 1993 | FR |
2 697 275 | Apr 1994 | FR |
2 781 513 | Jan 2000 | FR |
2 785 633 | May 2000 | FR |
424057 | Feb 1935 | GB |
585205 | Jan 1947 | GB |
599793 | Mar 1948 | GB |
636423 | Apr 1950 | GB |
812671 | Apr 1959 | GB |
1127915 | Oct 1968 | GB |
1237744 | Jun 1971 | GB |
1275511 | May 1972 | GB |
1430423 | Mar 1976 | GB |
2117813 | Oct 1983 | GB |
2126106 | Mar 1984 | GB |
2243381 | Oct 1991 | GB |
2256023 | Nov 1992 | GB |
54-65528 | May 1979 | JP |
57-119056 | Jul 1982 | JP |
59-186336 | Nov 1984 | JP |
3-169967 | Jul 1991 | JP |
4-106264 | Apr 1992 | JP |
4-191001 | Jul 1992 | JP |
5-148984 | Jun 1993 | JP |
6-56310 | May 1994 | JP |
6-146553 | May 1994 | JP |
6-320510 | Nov 1994 | JP |
7-076923 | Mar 1995 | JP |
7-180333 | Jul 1995 | JP |
7-300979 | Nov 1995 | JP |
7-310426 | Nov 1995 | JP |
8-109734 | Apr 1996 | JP |
9-38906 | Feb 1997 | JP |
9-88315 | Mar 1997 | JP |
2000-226932 | Aug 2000 | JP |
7601773 | Aug 1976 | NL |
157871 | Jul 1984 | NO |
305614 | May 1995 | NO |
24931 | Nov 1974 | PL |
372 051 | May 1973 | SE |
450 141 | Jun 1984 | SE |
501 014 | Oct 1994 | SE |
502 994 | Mar 1996 | SE |
506 254 | Nov 1997 | SE |
509 059 | Jun 1998 | SE |
509 060 | Jun 1998 | SE |
512 290 | Dec 1999 | SE |
512 313 | Dec 1999 | SE |
363795 | Nov 1973 | SU |
WO 8402155 | Jun 1984 | WO |
WO 8703839 | Jul 1987 | WO |
WO 9217657 | Oct 1992 | WO |
WO 9313280 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO 9401628 | Jan 1994 | WO |
WO 9426999 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9627719 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO 9627721 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO 9630177 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9747834 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9824994 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9824995 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9838401 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9940273 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9966151 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 9966152 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0006854 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0020705 | Apr 2000 | WO |
0020706 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0066856 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0166876 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0166877 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0198604 | Dec 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030033784 A1 | Feb 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09954066 | Sep 2001 | US |
Child | 10256167 | US | |
Parent | PCT/SE01/00125 | Jan 2001 | US |
Child | 09954066 | US |