The invention relates to thrust reversers of the cascade type surrounding the bypass turbojets of airplanes, its reversers comprising a fixed part and a movable part, and more specifically to a locking system for immobilizing the movable part on the fixed part.
Thrust reversers are familiar devices that allow the flow of propulsion gases produced by the bypass turbojet to be temporarily deflected forward. The reverser is in the general form of a body of revolution surrounding the turbojet and is basically concentric with it. The reverser has a fixed part and at least one movable part. Schematically, the fixed part consists of a front frame and a rear frame, both annular in shape and connected by a plurality of longitudinal members in the manner of a squirrel cage. The front frame, the rear frame and the longitudinal members are rigid and lightweight hollow structures which give the reverser its stiffness. The whole is surrounded by an external cowling and an internal cowling. Between the longitudinal members are radial holes equipped with a plurality of small vanes which together form cascades, these vanes being capable of deflecting the cold flow of the bypass turbojet in the forward direction. The movable part translates forward or backward to either cover or expose the radial openings. The movable parts are guided during their translation by rails sliding in parallel tracks, the tracks being attached to the longitudinal members. The movable parts are controlled by rams which are usually attached to the front frame.
The movable parts are held in the closed position by so-called “main” locks. These locks are usually situated on the front frame and catch the front ends of the movable parts. The main locks can become inoperative following rupture of a rotor or vane of the turbojet causing debris to be thrown around the turbojet. Debris impacting the reverser can deform the reverser and/or damage the locks. The danger then is that the movable parts may move into the open position, causing accidental and catastrophic thrust reversal while the plane is in flight. To reduce this danger very substantially, secondary locks are fitted at different locations than the main locks, for example on the longitudinal members. But the risk of the reverser being deformed by simultaneous impact on the main locks and secondary locks is not zero. This risk can be prevented by adding still more locks, but then there is a greater risk of a lock failing to open when the airplane pilot engages thrust reversal, in which case the thrust reverser would fail to operate.
The locks are usually of the hook type, that is the bolt is in the form of a hook and retains a roller on the end of a tie rod, the other end of the tie rod being connected to a movable part while the body of the lock is attached to the fixed structure. However, there are drawbacks with such locks:
An initial problem to be solved is that of creating a locking system for a cascade thrust reverser, where the system must be insensitive both to impact and to the accidental deformations of the reverser which may arise from such impact.
A second problem to be solved is that of making the locking system small so that it can be fitted between the walls of very thin reversers.
A third problem to be solved is that of creating a locking system for a cascade thrust reverser that does not generate torque at the locations where they are attached to the reverser.
To solve the first problem, the invention provides a locking system on a cascade thrust reverser for a bypass turbojet, the reverser comprising a fixed part which in turn comprises a plurality of radial openings separated by longitudinal members, the radial openings being closed by movable parts moving in the closing direction, the radial openings being exposed when the movable parts move in the opening direction, the reverser comprising guide means for the movable parts, the guide means comprising rails attached to the movable parts and parallel tracks attached to the longitudinal members, and the rails sliding in the tracks, with preferably one degree of freedom in translation, the tracks thus forming elements of the fixed part and the rails elements of the movable parts.
Such a system is noteworthy in that it comprises locks attached to the fixed part in the vicinity of the end of each track in the opening direction, each lock comprising a bolt positioned in line with the corresponding track, the bolt being movable between a locked position and an open position, the bolt in the locked position preventing the rail moving in the opening direction when the rail is retracted in the track, and the bolt in the open position not preventing the rail from moving in the opening direction.
With such an arrangement, the end of the track and the lock move in the space in essentially the same manner when the fixed part deforms because the lock is in the vicinity of the end of the track. The bolt therefore remains substantially in line with the track in the vicinity of its end, and no movement of the movable part in the opening direction is possible as long as the bolt is in the closed position. This solves the first problem.
When it is in the closed position, the bolt has the effect of imprisoning the rail in the track, these two parts being inherently mechanically strong, which makes the locking system relatively insensitive to impact and solves the second problem. Notice that this imprisoning of the rail in the track also has the advantage that the movable parts are restrained even in the event of major damage.
The third problem is solved by the fact that:
A clearer understanding of the invention and its advantages will be gained from a perusal of the following detailed description and of the appended figures.
Referring initially to
The reverser 20 is of the well-known cascade type. It comprises a fixed structure 30 consisting of a front frame 32 and a rear frame indicated by the reference 34 but not visible in
The fixed structure 30 thus comprises radial openings 38 that are each delimited in the forward direction by the front frame 32, in the rearward direction by the rear frame 34 and separated from each other by the longitudinal members 36.
For obvious reasons of stiffness and low weight, the components of the fixed structure 30 are hollow and made up of thin walls, such as sheet metal or a composite material based on fiber or textile-reinforced thermosetting resin. Such a fixed structure 30 is however still capable of being deformed under the impact of debris resulting from a vane or rotor of the turbojet braking.
Turning now to
When the movable parts 50 are covering the openings 38, they are held in this “closed” position, as it is called, by locks attached to the fixed structure 30. Usually, each movable part 50 is held by its front end by a “main” lock attached to the front frame 32. The main lock may however become inoperative in the event of deformation of the front frame 32 following an impact. It is therefore usual to fit so-called back-up locks on either side of each movable part 50, attaching them at different locations than the main locks.
Referring now more particularly to
The lock 82 can be attached to the longitudinal member 36. It can also be attached, or indeed built in, directly to the end 62a of the track 62, thereby further reducing the risk of a relative movement occurring between the bolt 110 and the track 62. The important point is that the path along which the load would be transferred between the end 62a of the track and the point of attachment of the lock to the fixed structure must be short.
In a first embodiment of the invention, the locks 82 are the main locks.
However, in a preferred embodiment of the invention, the locks 82 are back-up locks, the reverser having independent main locks, and possibly secondary locks, based on known technology.
The locking system 80 also comprises bolt 110 control means 130. These control means comprise firstly a lever 132 and an actuator 134. The lever 132 is perpendicular to the bolt 110 and attached to it preferably, but not necessarily, on the outside of the U yoke 92. The actuator 134 is attached to the movable part 50 and preferably to the rail 64 of the movable part 50. The actuator 134 is positioned so as to apply a force to the lever 132 when the rail 64 moves in the closing direction 54 and reaches the end of its travel inside the track 62, this force causing the bolt 110 to pivot to the closed position. The control means 130 also include a spring (not shown), such as a spiral spring, which applies a torque to the bolt 110 such as to pivot it automatically into the open position. Lastly, the control means 130 comprise a catch (also not shown because hidden inside the body of the lock) that is itself controlled by a motor 138, the catch keeping the bolt 110 automatically in the closed position despite the torque applied by the spring. In response to a signal the motor 138 allows the catch to be disengaged in order to free the bolt 110 and allow it to pivot into the open position under the action of the spring. The catch is of some ordinary mechanical engineering design. It may take the form of, for example, a pin sliding in the body 90 and pushed by a spring against the bolt 110, so that the pin passes into a hole in the bolt 110 when in the locked position and so prevents the bolt 110 from pivoting, while the motor 138 can pull the pin out of the hole to release the bolt 110. The motor 138 may for example be a linear electric motor with a core that passes into a solenoid, the moving core being connected to the rod or forming one end of this rod.
The movable parts of the reverser can thus be opened in the following manner:
The movable parts of the reverser can be closed in the following manner:
It will be understood that the lock 82 may be in a “solid” form and be located in a small space at the end of a track 62. This achieves two advantages for the invention:
Another advantage of the invention is that the rail abuts endwise against the bolt, so there is no torque on the rail.
Referring now to
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
01 12405 | Sep 2001 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR02/03278 | 9/26/2002 | WO | 00 | 4/23/2004 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO03/027474 | 4/3/2003 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3024603 | Tschudy | Mar 1962 | A |
3040524 | Kurti | Jun 1962 | A |
3262269 | Kutney et al. | Jul 1966 | A |
3500644 | Felix et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3599432 | Ellis | Aug 1971 | A |
3941313 | Jumelle | Mar 1976 | A |
3981451 | Prior et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4177639 | Taylor | Dec 1979 | A |
4373328 | Jones | Feb 1983 | A |
4442987 | Legrand et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4501393 | Klees et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4922713 | Barbarin et al. | May 1990 | A |
4976466 | Vauchel | Dec 1990 | A |
5228641 | Remlaoui | Jul 1993 | A |
5313788 | Wright et al. | May 1994 | A |
5448884 | Repp | Sep 1995 | A |
5778659 | Duesler et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
6042053 | Sternberger et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6170253 | Newton | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6286784 | Hardy et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6385964 | Jean et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6554224 | Sternberger | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6557799 | Sternberger | May 2003 | B1 |
6584763 | Lymons et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6684623 | Langston et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6688098 | Rouyer et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6786039 | Chakkera et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6824101 | Sternberger et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040231317 A1 | Nov 2004 | US |