(1) Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to a locking window and, more particularly, to a window latch for such a window.
(2) Description of the Prior Art
Up to the end of World War II, most windows were constructed of wood. However, following the War, aluminum windows were initially constructed for low-end housing. Over time, the clear superiority of metal windows led to their use in many different types of housing. Similarly, vinyl windows were introduced in low-end housing in the beginning of the last decade. The use of vinyl windows has grown much more quickly than metal windows. In fact, the majority of windows are now constructed using vinyl.
During this time, locking windows have generally used metal latches similar to those that were initially used on wooden windows. Now, although vinyl windows are the predominant construction, there has still been a hesitancy to use plastic hardware. However, metal is much heavier than its corresponding plastic counterpart. Also, plastic retains its appearance when mishandled or otherwise misused that would causes unacceptable chips to form on painted metal hardware. Also, in today's global economy, window hardware may be made in another country. Accordingly, advantages of substantial weight savings to create lower shipping costs have become even more important.
However, making a locking window having a plastic latch is more than a mere substitution of materials. Because plastic is generally more flexible than metal, attempts at constructing a window latch have failed since there's not a sufficient amount of support to prevent bowing. The significance of bowing relates primarily due to the requirement that a latch be able to maintain a static load of about 160 pounds. When a conventional latch design is formed from plastics, the bowing of the latch is so substantial that the static load will actually slide off the latch arm. Because of this problem, such plastic window latches having conventional designs have not been able to pass the static load test.
Also, the labor cost for attaching a latch to a window affects the overall cost of a locking window. One factor affecting this cost is the number of fasteners required for attaching a latch to a window. Another factor is the alignment of the window latch on the window. However, reducing the number of fasteners introduces undesirable and unacceptable play of the latch during opening and closing while at the same time making alignment more difficult. The increased difficultly of alignment rather than decreasing cost, increases cost since properly aligning the latch during attachment involves more time.
Thus, there remains a need for a new and improved locking window having a window latch which may be completely formed from chip resistant plastics while, at the same time, still provides sufficient firmness due to its arrangement to resist normal wear and tear during assembly and use.
The present invention is directed to a locking window having a window frame and a window latch for use with the window. The window frame includes at least one window sash that is selectively movable between a first closed position and a second open position. The window latch, which is adapted to be attached to the window using a distinct fastener, is selectively movable between a first open position and a second locked position to secure the window sash in the closed position. The window latch includes an actuator arm, a locking arm, a non-compressible pivot and a housing. A pivot location is situated at the union of the actuator arm and the locking arm. The pivot location permits the actuator arm and the locking arm to be selectively movable between a first closed position and a second open position. The housing may include a securing feature for maintaining the housing substantially set relative to the window while at the same time permitting the actuator arm and the locking arm to be selectively movable between a first closed position and a second open position.
An example of a securing feature is a lip (e.g., extending beyond a bottom of the housing) adapted to engage the window to ensure alignment. An example of a distinct fastener is a threaded fastener. An example of a non-compressible pivot is a support bushing. A non-compressible pivot may further include a lower load-bearing surface. Alternatively, the non-compressible pivot may be an inverted bushing. In any case, a non-compressible pivot may include an aperture through which the distinct fastener may pass to secure the latch to the window. Also, a non-compressible pivot prevents compression of the housing by the distinct fastener while at the same time permitting the actuator arm and the locking arm to be selectively movable between a first closed position and a second open position.
The window latch may further include a detent for retaining the latch in one of the open and the locked positions. The detent may have an element having a planar orientation and an additional element that interact with the planer element. Also, the detent may provide an audible click while transitioning to one of the open and the locked positions. The planer element of the detent may further include at least one groove on one of the housing and the sweep latch. The at least one grove may be a barbell shaped grove. Likewise, the additional element of the detent may further include at least one protrusion on the other of the housing and the sweep latch.
The window latch may further include a locking arm stop. The locking arm stop may prevent non-intentional movement. Also, the locking arm stop may hinder intentional attempted movement from the exterior.
The housing may further include any one of a finger well, a finger shoulder, an aperture for accepting the distinct fastener, a cover, and combinations thereof. The aperture for accepting the distinct fastener may further include a retainer for holding the distinct fastener in the window latch to facilitate an efficient positioning and securing of the window latch to the window. The cover may be used to conceal the distinct fastener after it has been secured to the window. To that end, the cover may be a screw cap. Also, the cover may include indicia to, for example, display a logo, brand name and the like. The inclusion of indicia on the cover allows the same latch design to be sold under a variety of brand names.
The window latch of the present invention may be any one of a cam latch, a sweep latch and an offset sweep latch. The window frame may be made of any one of wood, polymer and metal. The window sash may be any one of, a casement window, a single hung window, a double hung window including horizontally and vertically sliding sashes.
A window latch may include a strengthening web between the arms that may be in the form of a support wall. For a cam latch, the support wall may be between the locking arm and an end of the housing. For a sweep latch, the support wall may be offset to one side of the housing. Also with the cam latch and the sweep latch, a second wall may be included. For a sweep latch, the walls may be offset with respect to each other. The walls may be substantially perpendicular to the face. For an offset sweep latch, the housing may include a reinforcing shoulder. Also, for an offset sweep latch, the housing may have a distal end extending above the locking arm and the actuator arm.
A window latch may include a keeper. For a cam latch, the keeper may include any one of a cam detent for engagement by the locking arm and an aperture for facilitating the attachment of the keeper to the window. An aperture for attachment may further include a retainer for holding a fastener in the keeper to facilitate an efficient positioning and securing of the keeper to the window.
The pivot location of a window latch may include a key lock that facilitates the transmission of movement from an actuator arm to a locking arm. Further, the key lock may include an alignment feature that facilitates a rapid and consistent alignment of an actuator arm and a locking arm.
The locking arm of a window latch may include an inclined face that facilitates the transition between a first open position and a second locked position to secure the window sash in the closed position. A length of the locking arm is less than or equal to one half a length of the actuator arm. For a cam latch, the locking arm may include a cam wall for engaging the cam detent. The actuator arm may further include a finger tab.
In an embodiment according to the present invention, a window latch may include a keeper buttress that strengthens the keeper as it is engaged by the locking arm. In this manner the locking arm fixedly engages to the keeper even while external force is exerted on the window. The keeper buttress may be part of any one of the housing, the locking arm, and the actuator arm.
Accordingly, one aspect of the present invention is to provide a locking window having a window frame and a window latch for use with the window. The window frame includes at least one window sash that is selectively movable between a first closed position and a second open position. The window latch, which is adapted to be attached to the window using a distinct fastener, is selectively movable between a first open position and a second locked position to secure the window sash in the closed position. The window latch includes an actuator arm, a locking arm and a housing. A pivot location is situated at the union of the actuator arm and the locking arm. The pivot location permits the actuator arm and the locking arm to be selectively movable between a first closed position and a second open position.
Another aspect of the present invention is to provide a window latch for use with window having a window frame. The window frame includes at least one window sash that is selectively movable between a first closed position and a second open position. The window latch, which is adapted to be attached to the window using a distinct fastener, is selectively movable between a first open position and a second locked position to secure the window sash in the closed position. The window latch includes an actuator arm, a locking arm and a housing. A pivot location is situated at the union of the actuator arm and the locking arm. The pivot location permits the actuator arm and the locking arm to be selectively movable between a first closed position and a second open position. The housing includes a securing feature for maintaining the housing substantially set relative to the window while at the same time permitting the actuator arm and the locking arm to be selectively movable between a first closed position and a second open position.
Still another aspect of the present invention is to provide a locking window having a window frame and a window latch for use with the window. The window frame includes at least one window sash that is selectively movable between a first closed position and a second open position. The window latch, which is adapted to be attached to the window using a distinct fastener, is selectively movable between a first open position and a second locked position to secure the window sash in the closed position. The window latch includes an actuator arm, a locking arm, a non-compressible pivot and a housing. A pivot location is situated at the union of the actuator arm and the locking arm. The pivot location permits the actuator arm and the locking arm to be selectively movable between a first closed position and a second open position. The housing may include a securing feature for maintaining the housing substantially set relative to the window while at the same time permitting the actuator arm and the locking arm to be selectively movable between a first closed position and a second open position.
These and other aspects of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art after a reading of the following description of the preferred embodiment when considered with the drawings.
In the following description, like reference characters designate like or corresponding parts throughout the several views. Also in the following description, it is to be understood that such terms as “forward,” “rearward,” “left,” “right,” “upwardly,” “downwardly,” and the like are words of convenience and are not to be construed as limiting terms.
Referring now to the drawings in general and
As best seen in
As best seen in
A window latch 14 fastenable to the distinct fastener 82 to the window 10 may include a housing 16. Depending on the particular type of window latch, the housing 16 may include a variety of features. For example, when the housing 16 is associated with an offset sweep latch the housing 16 may further include a finger well 60. Alternatively, when the housing 16 is associated with a sweep latch or a cam latch, the housing 16 may further include a finger shoulder 66. No matter the type of latch, the housing 16 may include a cover 62 that, optionally, may include indicia 64.
As best seen in
As best seen in
A window latch 14 may include a strengthening web between the arms that may be in the form of a support wall 44. As best seen in
The window latch 14 may include a keeper 86 in such instances when the window latch is a cam latch. The keeper 86 would further include a cam detent 90 and an aperture 92 for attachment that may also include a retainer 94.
In the case that the latch includes a keeper 86, the housing 16 may further include a keeper buttress 32. It has been found that the keeper 86 tends to bow when engaged by the locking arm 36 and it is beneficial to have a keeper buttress 32 to prevent its deflection and upward movement.
As best seen in
Each of the window latches 14, according to the present invention, includes a non-compressible pivot 20. The non-compressible pivot 20 allows the fastening of the window latch to the frame while facilitating its smooth operation. The non-compressible pivot 20 may include a fastener 82 that, for example, might be a threaded fastener. The non-compressible pivot 20 may be a support bushing or an inverted bushing. It may further include a lower bearing surface.
The operation of a locking window having an offset sweep is discussed in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/489,489; filed Jan. 21, 2000, in the names of Miller et al. The operation of a locking window having a cam is discussed in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/922,577; filed Aug. 3, 2001, in the names of Miller et al. The operation of a locking window having a sweep is discussed in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/908,418; filed Jul. 18, 2001, in the names of Miller et al. Each disclosure of these applications is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety.
The operation of a locking window 10 having a window frame 12 and a window latch 14 for use with the window has been discussed above. It is noteworthy that the window latch 14 is adapted to be attached to the window frame 14 using a distinct fastener 82. Also noteworthy is that the housing 16 may include a securing feature 76 for maintaining the housing 16 substantially set relative to the window frame 14 while at the same time permitting the actuator arm and the locking arm to be selectively movable between a first closed position and a second open position. Further, it is noteworthy that a window latch 14 may include a keeper buttress 32 that strengthens the keeper 86 as it is engaged by the locking arm 36. In this manner the locking arm 36 may fixedly engage the keeper 86 even while external force are exerted on the window. The keeper buttress 32 may be part of any one of the housing, the locking arm, and the actuator arm.
The window latch 14 may be formed from any lightweight durable material, such as a lightweight metal including aluminum, or a polymeric material. Applicants contemplate that suitable materials may be characterized by at least one of high strength, high rigidity, very good impact resistance, good elastic properties, dimensional stability, low tendency to creep, and simple processing. Preferably, suitable materials may be characterized by a plurality of the above. Applicants have found that among polymeric materials, polyamides (also known as nylons) work well and believe that polyamides including a filler may work well. In the preferred embodiment, the material used to form the window latch 14 was made using commercially available polyamides such as the “ULTRAMID®” polyamide sold by BASF Corporation of Mount Olive, N.J. These ULTRAMID®” polyamide materials, their applications, properties and processing as described in a publication by BASF Plastics entitled “ULTRAMID®” Polyamides, the subject mater of which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.
For wear resistance, applicants contemplate that a semi-crystalline Nylon 6 (PA6) containing about 30 percent glass fiber may work. One such material is manufactured by Hughes Supply & Manufacturing Company of Thomasville, Inc., of Thomasville, N.C. under the trademark “FIBERTRON™” material and has the properties presented below in Table 1.
The “FIBERTRON™” material may be made using commercially available polyamides such as the “ULTRAMID®” polyamide sold by BASF Corporation of Mount Olive, N.J. These ULTRAMID®” polyamide materials, their applications, properties and processing as described in a publication by BASF Plastics entitled “ULTRAMID®” Polyamides, the subject mater of which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.
As may be appreciated by those skilled in the art, a window and window latch constructed according to the present invention may be substantially completely formed from plastics while at the same time still provide sufficient strength due to their arrangement to resist normal wear and tear during assembly and use.
Table 2 contains a summary of a comparison of the window integrity, the ease of use of the window, and the product of the previous two. This comparison is for windows including a longitudinal window latch (i.e., depth to length ratio from about less than 1 to substantially less than 1), and the present invention. Window integrity may be defined as the ability of a window to have initially, and continue to have after repeated operation, for example, one or more of wind resistance, strength, and sealabilty. Ease of use may be defined as the ability of a window to have initially, and continue to have after repeated operation, for example, one or more of fluid pivoting and sliding movement without binding. As noted below in Table 2, 1 means that the window performs poorly, 2 means that the window performs poorly to neutrally, 3 means that the window performs neutrally, 4 means that the window performs neutrally to excellently, and 5 means that the window performs excellently.
The window of the present invention is superior having an overall rating {(Integrity)×(Ease of Use)}of 16 verses 6 for the prior art. One reason for this superiority comes from the prior latch (See e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,139,291) having a tendency for twisting and popping out of the sash rail when force is exerted on the sash rail directly or through a wind pane contained within the sash.
Certain modifications and improvements will occur to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the foregoing description. It should be understood that all such modifications and improvements have been deleted herein for the sake of conciseness and readability but are properly within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
229894 | Kolb | Jul 1880 | A |
907525 | Rapson | Dec 1908 | A |
949862 | Tower | Feb 1910 | A |
1950311 | Leghart | Mar 1934 | A |
2613526 | Holmsten | Oct 1952 | A |
3125923 | Hanneman | Mar 1964 | A |
3645573 | Strang | Feb 1972 | A |
4036039 | Nakanishi | Jul 1977 | A |
4061370 | Hauber | Dec 1977 | A |
4093285 | Fayle | Jun 1978 | A |
4095829 | Van Klompenburg | Jun 1978 | A |
4135773 | Van Remoortel | Jan 1979 | A |
D268643 | Anderson | Apr 1983 | S |
4436328 | Chernosky | Mar 1984 | A |
4443032 | Bonassi | Apr 1984 | A |
4578903 | Simpson | Apr 1986 | A |
4683731 | Wickman | Aug 1987 | A |
4736972 | Mosch | Apr 1988 | A |
4763497 | Nakai | Aug 1988 | A |
4790579 | Maxwell et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4801164 | Mosch | Jan 1989 | A |
4813725 | Mosch | Mar 1989 | A |
4818000 | Bobrowski | Apr 1989 | A |
D302651 | Mosch | Aug 1989 | S |
5040835 | Barker | Aug 1991 | A |
5060993 | Maier | Oct 1991 | A |
5103533 | Pettit et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5161839 | Piltingsrud | Nov 1992 | A |
5219195 | Lawrence | Jun 1993 | A |
5248174 | Matz et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5301989 | Dallmann et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5414899 | Raetz | May 1995 | A |
5489131 | Blom | Feb 1996 | A |
D369741 | Harrison et al. | May 1996 | S |
D380957 | Evans et al. | Jul 1997 | S |
D382191 | Plummer | Aug 1997 | S |
D386384 | Rausch et al. | Nov 1997 | S |
5741032 | Chaput | Apr 1998 | A |
5791700 | Biro | Aug 1998 | A |
5839767 | Piltingsrud | Nov 1998 | A |
D418737 | Libby et al. | Jan 2000 | S |
6010094 | Csik et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6068306 | Brautigam | May 2000 | A |
6116665 | Subliskey | Sep 2000 | A |
D432392 | Miller et al. | Oct 2000 | S |
6142541 | Rotondi | Nov 2000 | A |
D442058 | Miller et al. | May 2001 | S |
6347820 | Subliskey | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6412834 | Waitai et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6457752 | Miller et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6598910 | Mcgregor | Jul 2003 | B1 |