The present invention relates to the field of gas furnaces, and in particular to monitoring pollutant levels in the vent system of a furnace and controlling operation of the furnace based on sensed pollutant levels.
Carbon monoxide (CO) may be produced during the combustion process in a malfunctioning gas heating appliance. If excessive CO is released into the heated space, it can cause health related issues for occupants of the heated space. In some conventional ambient air systems, a CO sensor is disposed within the heated space to sense CO levels, and could be configured to disable the flow of fuel to the furnace upon detection of unsafe levels of CO. However, this type of system will either disable the furnace indefinitely, or will cause it to cycle the furnace back on when CO levels are safe, then off again as CO levels rise. If a trip occurs during cold weather, and the building being heated remains unoccupied for a long period of time or a service person is not readily available, water fixtures and pipes can freeze up and burst, causing significant damage to the structure. In addition, if the furnace cycles on and off indefinitely, the cumulative buildup of CO could lead to extended periods of unsafe levels.
The subject invention is directed to a furnace system that includes a pollutant sensor electrically connected between a thermostat and a power supply for sensing a pollutant concentration in the furnace system. The pollutant sensor disconnects the thermostat from the power supply when the pollutant concentration reaches a pollutant threshold and reconnects the thermostat to the power supply when the pollutant concentration falls below the pollutant threshold. When the thermostat is calling for heat, a furnace controller monitors the pollutant sensor and disables the furnace system for a lockout period if a lockout criterion related to the pollutant sensor is met.
Burner assembly 12 is located within burner box 14 and is supplied with air via combustion air pipe 16. Fuel gas is supplied to burner assembly 12 through gas valve 18, which may be a solenoid-operated gas valve, and is ignited by an igniter assembly (not shown). The gases produced by combustion within burner box 14 flow through a heat exchanger assembly, which includes primary or non-condensing heat exchanger 20, secondary or condensing heat exchanger 24, and condensate collector box 26. The gases are then vented to the atmosphere by inducer motor 32 through exhaust vent pipe 28. The flow of these gases, herein called combustion gases, is maintained by induced draft blower 30, which is driven by inducer motor 32. Inducer motor 32 is driven in response to speed control signals that are generated by a furnace control circuit located within furnace control 50, in response to the states of low pressure switch 42 and high pressure switch 44, and in response to call-for-heat signals received from thermostat 34 in the space to be heated.
Air from the space to be heated is drawn into furnace 10 by blower 52, which is driven by blower motor 54 in response to speed control signals that are generated by furnace control 50. The discharge air from the blower 52, herein called circulating air, passes over condensing heat exchanger 24 and primary heat exchanger 20 in a counterflow relationship to the flow of combustion air, before being directed to the space to be heated through a duct system (not shown).
If the fuel combustion process in furnace 10 is mid-adjusted or malfunctions, pollutants such as carbon monoxide (CO) could be formed. These pollutants could be introduced into the environment being heated if a vent system fails or is disconnected. Normal furnace design practice is to operate the heat exchanger combustion gases at a pressure less than atmospheric so that any leaks in the heat exchangers leak ambient air into the combustion gas passageways. As an added precaution, in the event that combustion gases are released into the heated space at unacceptable levels, a pollutant sensor may be provided in furnace 10 to sense pollutant levels. In addition, furnace control 50 is operable to maintain acceptable pollutant levels, or to shut the furnace down.
The pollutant threshold may be a programmable setpoint in pollutant sensor 60 that is based on acceptable pollutant levels in the combustion gases of furnace 10. Furnace control 50 is connected to receive signals from pollutant sensor 60 related to its status. Current flows to fuel supply control block 64 when thermostat 34 is calling for heat and when the electrical connection that is maintained by pollutant sensor 60 between power supply 62 and thermostat 34 is closed. When pollutant sensor 60 is closed, furnace control 50 manages operation of fuel supply control block 64 for the combustion cycle.
If pollutant levels in the combustion gases exceed the programmed pollutant threshold, pollutant sensor 60 opens the electrical connection between power supply 62 and thermostat 34 (decision step 74). When this occurs, a cycle counter in furnace control 50 is increased, and furnace control 50 shuts down furnace 10 (i.e., furnace control 50 de-energizes gas valve 18) to allow pollutant levels to drop below the pollutant threshold. The period of time that pollutant sensor 60 remains open is a function of the sensor's responsiveness to changes in pollutant levels in furnace 10. If pollutant sensor 60 re-closes and thermostat 34 continues to call for heat, furnace control 50 re-initiates the combustion cycle. If pollutant levels in the combustion gases again exceed the programmed threshold level, pollutant sensor 60 again opens, and the cycle counter in furnace control 50 is incremented to track the number of times pollutant sensor 60 opens during a single call for heat.
Furnace control 50 then determines whether a lockout criterion has been met (decision step 76). The lockout criterion is a threshold programmed in furnace control 50 related to the number of times that pollutant sensor 60 opens during a programmed period of time that, when exceeded, causes furnace control 50 to shut down for a lockout period to let the pollutant levels in the heated space to drop to acceptable levels. The lockout criterion may be set based on the number of times pollutant sensor 60 opens, which is related to the value stored in the cycle counter. In various embodiments, this number is in the range of between one and ten. In addition, the lockout criterion may be set based on the number of times pollutant sensor 60 opens within a certain period of time. In various embodiments, the lockout criterion is met if pollutant sensor 60 opens a threshold number of times (e.g., one to ten).within a single heating cycle or within a time in the range of between 1 and 24 hours.
If the lockout criterion has not been met (decision step 76), the combustion cycle is initiated again after pollution sensor 60 closes (step 70). If the lockout criterion is met by pollution sensor 60 opening (decision step 76), furnace control 50 disables furnace 10 for the lockout period (step 78). In various embodiments, the lockout period is between about one hour and about eight hours. After furnace 10 has been disabled for the lockout period of time, furnace control 50 again initiates the combustion cycle to provide heat to the heated environment (step 70). The lockout period is set based on a balance between reducing pollutant levels and assuring that sufficient heat is provided to the heated environment to prevent freezing of pipes and other fixtures.
Computer simulations were conducted employing the above algorithm for an 88,000 BTU input furnace having a nominal heating cycle of twelve minutes on, three minutes off, which is a typical furnace operating cycle during periods of very cold weather. The simulated heated environment was a 1,800 square foot one story house with a very low 0.15 air changes per hour (ACH) infiltration rate. It was assumed that all combustion air was drawn from indoors and that all pollutants (in this case, carbon monoxide) produced by the furnace were being released into the living space (e.g., as a result of a completely disconnected or failed vent pipe). It was also assumed that the thermostat was continuously calling for heat. Based on these conditions, the algorithm was tested for different scenarios with several variable input parameters, including the CO concentration threshold of pollutant sensor 60 in parts-per-million (ppm), the time for pollutant sensor 60 to open after the pollutant threshold was reached, the time for pollutant sensor 60 to re-close after the pollutant levels drop below the pollutant threshold, the number of cycles in which pollutant sensor 60 opens and re-closes before lockout occurs, the lockout period, and the steady state average CO concentration in the house. The times for pollutant sensor 60 to open and re-close are functions of the sensitivity and response time of pollutant sensor 60, and thus a variety of sensor open and re-close times were tested to simulate different types of sensors. The number of cycles until lockout and the lockout period are control variables that are programmable in furnace control 50. The results of the simulations are shown in Table 1.
In summary, the subject invention is directed to a furnace system that includes a pollutant sensor for sensing a pollutant concentration in the combustion gases of the furnace system. The pollutant sensor is configured to open when the pollutant concentration reaches a pollutant threshold and close when the pollutant concentration falls below the pollutant threshold. When the thermostat is calling for heat, a furnace controller monitors the pollutant sensor and disables the furnace system for a lockout period if a lockout criterion related to the pollutant sensor is met. When the furnace system is controlled in this manner, heat is provided to the location to prevent freezing of water pipes and fixtures while maintaining pollutants at safe levels.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to examples and preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2278252 | Eaton | Mar 1942 | A |
2393599 | Eaton | Jan 1946 | A |
3906473 | Le Vine | Sep 1975 | A |
3909816 | Teeters | Sep 1975 | A |
4032286 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4153201 | Berger et al. | May 1979 | A |
4162889 | Shigemura | Jul 1979 | A |
4789330 | Ballard et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
5074780 | Erdman | Dec 1991 | A |
5239980 | Hilt et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5379752 | Virgil et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5503550 | DePalma | Apr 1996 | A |
5576739 | Murphy | Nov 1996 | A |
5838243 | Gallo | Nov 1998 | A |
5971067 | Rayburn et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6045352 | Nicholson | Apr 2000 | A |
6161535 | Dempsey et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6283115 | Dempsey et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6318150 | Temple | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321744 | Dempsey et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6390806 | Dempsey et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6484951 | Mueller | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6552647 | Thiessen et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6572363 | Virgil et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6743091 | Meneely, Jr. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6851948 | Dempsey et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7581946 | Donnelly et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20050267710 | Heavner et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080085483 A1 | Apr 2008 | US |