The present invention relates in general to integrated analog circuits, and in particular, to an integrated logarithmic linear variable gain CMOS amplifier.
State of the art logarithmic linear amplifiers are based on a circuit structure as illustrated in
The linear logarithmic gain (dB gain) variation range of the function is relatively restricted. Generally, the value of x of the gain expression for remaining substantially in the linear dB gain variation range is limited to −0.7<x<0.7.
The variation of the bias current in a transistor notably alters its transconductance, thus obtaining the desired behavior of the circuit according to equation 1. However, the variation of the bias current also affects the bandwith and the linearity of the amplifier.
The group delay of the amplifier circuit is inversely proportional to the bandwith. It would be very desirable to render the group delay independent from the gain to prevent interaction between the gain loop and the phase loop.
Variable gain amplifiers work with a fixed output voltage swing (fixed by the control loop) and the gain is inversely proportional to the input voltage swing. While it would be highly desirable that linearity should be inversely proportional to the gain, unfortunately the known amplifier structures such as the one depicted in
In view of the foregoing background, an object of the present invention is to provide a logarithmic linear variable gain amplifier wherein the group delay is rendered substantially independent from the gain and the linearity of the amplifier is inversely proportional to the gain.
This and other objects, advantages and features in accordance with the present invnetion is provided in a relatively sraightforward manner, without substantially adding complexity to the basic circuit of an integrated logarithmic linear variable gain amplifier, by cross connecting two differential pairs of transistors that share the same diode loads and by biasing the two differential pairs of transistors connected with currents so that their sum remains constant.
This is achieved by mirroring in the common current node of the two differential pairs of transistors the required bias currents provided by the linear DAC and which have values A+x and B−x, respectively, where A and B are the respective bias currents and x is the variable factor. In this way, the sum of the two currents is kept constant as well as the bandwith that depends on it.
According to an optional but preferred embodiment, the diode loads, common to the two cross connected differential input stages, have transistors connencted in parallel thereto for subtracting a constant current of a desired value from the current that would otherwise be flowing through the diode loads. This permits translation of the gain curve of the amplifier according to needs.
As depicted in
The transconductance of the first input differential pair of transistors M1 is gm1, the transconductance of the second input differential pair of transistors M2 is gm2, and the transconductance of the diode-connected load transistors M3 is gm3. It may be demonstrated that the gain of the amplifier is given by the following equation:
where Ki is the transistor's gain constant proportional its aspect ratio W/L; I1, I2 and I3 are the respective bias currents of M1, M2 and M3; and the bandwith is given by the following equation:
wherein Cout is the capacitance of the output node, referred to the virtual ground node of the circuit.
Customarily, the two differential pairs of transistors M1 and M2 are biased by respective currents output by a linear digital-to-analog converter DAC through respective current mirrors M4 and M5. The pair of the diodes M3 connected to the load transistors is biased by the difference-between the sum of these currents and the currents flowing in transistors M6 and M7.
According to an essential condition of the invention, the two bias currents have a value given by expressions of the type A+x and B−x, where A and B are the preestabilished bias current values while x represents the variable factor. Therefore, the sum of the two bias currents is kept constant such that I3=I1+I2.
In the case of the preferred embodiment depicted in
Accordingly, the gain in dB is given by the following equation:
By observing equation 4, it may be easily recognized that the gain of the amplifier is linearly controlled by I1 and I2. While modifying the current I3, it is possible to translate the gain characteristic.
According to the preferred embodiment shown in
By substituting I3=I1+I2 in equation 4, the following equation is obtained:
Equation 5 may be plotted as shown in
When the gain is relatively high, the current in the first input differential pair of transistors M1 is much larger than the current in the second input differential pair of transistors M2. Under these conditions, linearity of the first differential input pair of transistors M1 is very good beacause its over bias is relatively high, while the linearity of the other differential input pair of transistors M2 is relatively poor. However, this is not a problem because the contribution of the second differential pair M2 to the output current is proportionally very small, and even its distortion has a negligible impact on the output current.
The gain is reduced by reducing the current in the first differential input pair of transistors M1 and complementarily increasing the current in the second input differential pair of transistors M2. By reducing the current in the first differential input pair of transistors M1 while the input signal swing is increasing is detrimental to its linearity, but at the same time the linearity of the other differential input pair of transistors M2 is improving. In addition, the third harmonic of transistors M2 is subtracted from the third harmonic of transistors M1, thus enhancing the overall linearity of the amplifier, as may be inferred by the following equation:
itot=i1|H1+i|H3−(i2|H1+i2|H3) (6)
where i1H1 indicates the first harmonic of the respective current signal i1.
In conclusion, the novel amplifier of the invention has a markedly improved linearity in comparison with the known amplifier circuit of
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
03425568.7 | Sep 2003 | EP | regional |