A growing number of applications, such as video, require the very rapid transmission of very large amounts of data. Such transmission may result in the expenditure of a significant amount of electrical power, and may additionally result in the generation of a significant amount of EMI (electro-magnetic interference).
For example, in an exemplary video application, micro electro-mechanical devices (MEMs) are used in the display of data. Such devices contain a RAM (random access memory) cell, wherein the condition of the cell (e.g. either a one or zero) controls the state of a mirror. Accordingly, by moving large amounts of data (e.g. 50 Mbits/second) a screen configured with MEM devices could be controlled. As can easily be seen, the bus supplying this data may expend considerable energy, and may generate considerable unwanted EMI.
Accordingly, improvements in bus design resulting in lower energy requirements and less EMI would be desirable.
A system includes logic configured for counting transitions between data on a bus and data to be put onto the bus. Where the counted transitions exceed a threshold, the data to be put onto the bus is complemented. As a result, complemented data is put on the bus where the threshold was exceeded and un-complemented data is put on the bus where the threshold was not exceeded.
The following detailed description refers to the accompanying figures. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the figure (Fig.) in which the reference number first appears. Moreover, the same reference numbers are used throughout the drawings to reference like features and components.
A system for operation of a bus configured to provide low power consumption and low EMI emissions is disclosed. Power consumption is reduced by reducing operation of components controlling the frequency of the need to raise and lower lines within the data bus (e.g. toggling lines between high voltage and low voltage). EMI emissions are similarly reduced by reduction of the toggling of data lines within the data bus. The system includes logic configured for counting transitions between data currently on a bus and data to be put onto the bus. For example, a transition would result where an individual line in the data bus moves from high (or low) voltage to low (or high) voltage. However, no transition would result on the individual line where it stayed at high (or low) voltage. Where the counted transitions exceed a threshold, the data to be put onto the bus is complemented, and the complemented data is put on the bus instead. Accordingly, complemented data is put on the bus where the threshold was exceeded and un-complemented data is put on the bus where the threshold was not exceeded. By setting the threshold at a value of approximately half the width of the bus (e.g. 8 for a 16-bit data bus) using the complemented data where the number of transitions exceeds the threshold and un-complemented data where the number of transitions does not exceed the threshold will limit the transitions to at most half the number of bits in the bus for each data cycle. Thus, complementing data to be put onto the data bus under conditions wherein the threshold is exceeded can dramatically cut the power consumption required to transition data lines within the bus, and also the resultant EMI emissions.
A transition counter 110 is configured to compare the data currently being transmitted on the data bus 106 with the data which will be transmitted on the next cycle of the data bus. As will be seen in greater detail in the discussion of
Three exemplary implementations of the transition counter 110 are seen in
A data complement module 116 is configured to complement the data which is to be put on the data bus 106 if the number of transitions exceeded the threshold. The process by which data is complemented reverses every bit. For example, where the data bus 106 is eight bits wide, and the data is 11000011, the complement would be 00111100. In operation, the data complement module 116 operates in response to a determination by the transition counter that the number of transitions exceeded the threshold. For example, where the current data on the data bus is 11110000, and the data to be put onto the data bus is 11110001 it would not make sense to complement the data to be put onto the data bus, since this data is separated from the current data by only one transition (in the last bit). However, if the current data on the data bus is 11100011, it would make sense to complement 00011111, since this data is separated from the current data by six transitions (the first 6 bits), as would be revealed by the transition counter 110. In particular, the six transitions would exceed a threshold set at four (half the width of the 8-bit bus), requiring the operation of the data complement module 116.
A complement indicator module 118 is configured to operate the signal line 108 in a manner which indicates whether or not the data complement module 116 was used to complement the data. Accordingly, the status of the data on the data bus 106, either complemented or not complemented, can always be determined by the status of the signal line 108, which is regulated by the complement indicator 118.
A driver circuit 120 is configured to put the new data, complemented or not, onto the bus 106.
A complement detector 122 within the receiver 104 is configured to detect whether the data on the data bus 106 is complemented by examination of the signal line 108. Where the data is complemented, the data de-complementing module 124 is configured to de-complement the data by reversing each data bit.
The flow chart of
At block 302, transitions are counted between data on a bus and data to be put on the bus. In the exemplary system 100 of
At block 304, the data 208 (
At block 306, where the threshold was exceeded by the required transitions counted at block 302, the complemented data is put onto the bus. Alternatively, at bloc 308, where the threshold was not exceeded by the required transitions counted at block 302, the un-complemented data is put onto the bus.
The flow chart of
At block 324, a receiver obtains data from the bus 106. In the example of
Although the above disclosure has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological steps, it is to be understood that the appended claims are not limited to the specific features or steps described. Rather, the specific features and steps are exemplary forms of implementing this disclosure. For example, counting transitions between data on a bus and data to be put onto the bus could be done by any number of hardware, software and firmware implementations. The disclosed implementations—involving use of a ripple counter, a binary tree counter or a carry look-a-head counter—are meant only to be representative of several of the many ways in which this functionality could be performed. Accordingly, while these specific means are disclosed as examples, they are not meant to be construed in any way to be limiting. In a further example, while actions described in blocks of the flow diagrams may be performed in parallel with actions described in other blocks, the actions may occur in an alternate order, or may be distributed in a manner which associates actions with more than one other block. And further, while elements of the methods disclosed are intended to be performed in any desired manner, it is anticipated that logic, such as an ASIC or other hardware device, or computer- or processor-readable instructions, performed by a computer and/or processor, reading from a computer- or processor-readable media, such as a ROM, disk or CD ROM, would be preferred.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5168531 | Sigel | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5684997 | Kau et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5710911 | Walsh et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5713006 | Shigeeda | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5721933 | Walsh et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5724553 | Shigeeda | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5727221 | Walsh et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5729720 | Kau et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5734919 | Walsh et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5737563 | Shigeeda | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5737748 | Shigeeda | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5737764 | Shigeeda | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5754436 | Walsh et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5754837 | Walsh et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5771373 | Kau et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5778425 | Shigeeda | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5781780 | Walsh et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5784291 | Chen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5802555 | Shigeeda | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5805854 | Shigeeda | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5822550 | Milhaupt et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5835733 | Walsh et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5842005 | Walsh et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5845132 | Walsh et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5848253 | Walsh et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5852370 | Ko | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5864702 | Walsh et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5867717 | Milhaupt et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5870617 | Walsh et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5870621 | Walsh et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5872983 | Walsh et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5875312 | Walsh et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5943507 | Cornish et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5987244 | Kau et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6112273 | Kau et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6182203 | Simar, Jr. et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6421754 | Kau et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6493827 | Mueller et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6624670 | Payne et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6674897 | Sugisaki et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6819578 | Regev | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 20030058674 | Regev | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050188181 A1 | Aug 2005 | US |