This application is a national stage application of PCT/JP2016/074518, which claims priority to Japanese Application No. 2016-010749, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a loop antenna array that can form a linear and clear communication area boundary.
Recently, the need for radio communications whose communication areas are intentionally limited (limited-area radio) has been increased. For example, an “electric field communication system” disclosed in the following patent document 1 is one means for implementing the limited-area radio.
Patent document 1: Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2007-174570
In the electric field communication, only terminal devices that exist in an area neighboring an access point device installed in the environment can communicate with the access point device. However, the electric field distribution in the neighborhood of the access point heavily depends on the installation environment, posture of a user, and the like; thus, it has been difficult to achieve a linear and clear communication area boundary by the electric field. Accordingly, there arises a case where a terminal device cannot establish communications even when the terminal device exists in a position that should allow the communication, and also the opposite case may occur; thus, it has been impossible to construct a stable and highly reliable limited-area radio system.
It can be thought that one of the reasons that such a difficulty occurs is that the electric field is used as a communication medium; because the electric field distribution is strongly affected by a conductor and a dielectric existing around.
The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and an object thereof is to provide a loop antenna array that can form a linear and clear communication area boundary.
In order to solve the above problems, a loop antenna array of the present invention includes two loop antennas through which currents flow in opposite directions from each other.
According to the loop antenna array of the present invention, since the loop antenna array includes two loop antennas through which currents flow in opposite directions from each other, a linear and clear communication area boundary can be formed.
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to the drawings.
A loop antenna array of the present invention is a magnetic field antenna. For example, a low frequency (about 10 MHz or below) magnetic field has a feature that interaction thereof with a human body and surrounding environment is significantly lower than an electric field. Thus, it can be thought that using the low frequency magnetic field as a communication medium may be one means for solving the problems. In addition, if “sharp magnetic field distribution” that allows magnetic field strength to be rapidly attenuated at a communication area boundary can be made, it is possible to construct a highly reliable limited-area radio system.
However, in a loop antenna having one loop (
As illustrated in
The loop antennas 1 and 2 are, for example, formed of a continuous conductor wire LN. The + terminal, which is one end of the conductor wire LN, is connected to a signal terminal of an alternating-current source E while the − terminal, which is the other end of the conductor wire LN, is connected to a GND terminal of the alternating-current source E.
Currents flow through the loop antennas 1 and 2 in opposite directions from each other. In other words, viewing in a direction passing through each of the loop antennas 1 and 2 (z direction), at a timing when a positive voltage is applied to the signal terminal of the alternating-current source E, a clockwise current flows through the loop antenna 1 while a counterclockwise current flows through the loop antenna 2. Conversely, at a timing when a negative voltage is applied to the signal terminal of the alternating-current source E, a counterclockwise current flows through the loop antenna 1 while a clockwise current flows through the loop antenna 2.
Note that the currents in opposite directions from each other may flow by providing the + terminal and the − terminal on each of the loop antennas 1 and 2, that is, no continuous conductor wire is used for the formation, to connect the + terminal of the loop antenna 1 and the − terminal of the loop antenna 2 to the signal terminal of the alternating-current source E, and to connect the − terminal of the loop antenna 1 and the + terminal of the loop antenna 2 to the GND terminal of the alternating-current source E.
Alternatively, the currents in opposite directions from each other may flow by providing the + terminal and the − terminal on each of the loop antennas 1 and 2, and by providing two alternating-current sources to connect the + terminal and the − terminal of the loop antenna 1 to a signal terminal and a GND terminal of one alternating-current source respectively, and to connect the + terminal and the − terminal of the loop antenna 2 to a signal terminal and a GND terminal of the other alternating-current source respectively. In this case, when a positive voltage is applied to the signal terminal of one alternating-current source, it is only necessary to make synchronization such that a negative voltage is applied to the signal terminal of the other alternating-current source.
As illustrated in
In respect of making the communication area boundary flat, when a distance from a center point PL of an intercentral line segment L, which connects a center 1c of the loop antenna 1 and a center 2c of the loop antenna 2, to the communication area boundary having a distance in the direction passing through the loop antenna (z direction) is represented as a (the minimum distance from the center point PL to the communication area boundary), it is preferable that (d/2)<a is made. In other words, it is desirable to set a distance between antennas to satisfy d<2a.
As illustrated in
The magnetic field strength contour through the point Pa has a part substantially parallel to the intercentral straight line segment L. In other words, this parallel part of the magnetic field strength contour can be used as the linear and clear communication area boundary.
Generally, amplitude of a magnetic field generated in the distance by the loop antenna is proportional to the size of a magnetic dipole moment vector m. m is obtained by the following equation.
m=N·I·S
N is the number of loops of the loop antenna, I is a value of the current flowing through the loop antenna, S is the area size surrounded by the loop antenna, and a direction of m (vector) is a direction of a right screw with respect to the direction of the current rotation.
In the first embodiment, since the currents flow in opposite directions, when the shape, the area size, and the number of loops of each of the loop antennas 1 and 2 are the same, the sum of m in light of the orientation becomes zero, for example.
In other words, as illustrated in
In other words, according to the first embodiment, a sharper magnetic field area (communication area) than that of the loop antenna having one loop can be formed.
Note that a shape of the magnetic field area does not depend on the shape of the loop antenna; thus, the shape of the magnetic field may be other than a circle, such as a square, a rectangle, an oval, a sector, a triangle, a semicircle, a spiral, and a helix. However, the shape is not limited thereto. The shape is only necessary to be a shape that forms the magnetic dipole moment vector when the current flows.
In addition, the number of loops is not limited to one. Moreover, N×S (the number of loops×the area size) of each of the loop antenna 1 and 2 may be made equal while the shape may be different.
The loop antenna array of the second embodiment includes multiple (two) loop antenna arrays of the first embodiment (
In the loop antenna array, the total number of the loop antenna is 2 to the n-th power (n=2)=4.
In addition, all centers of the loop antennas 1 to 4 are arranged on the same straight line segment LL.
Moreover, when a group of the 2 to the (n−1)-th power (=two) loop antennas is a unit loop antenna array, the loop antennas 1 and 2 make one unit loop antenna array A while the loop antennas 3 and 4 make another unit loop antenna array B.
The direction of the current flowing through the loop antenna 1 positioned at one end side (e.g., the left side of the drawing) of the same straight line segment LL in one unit loop antenna array A and the direction of the current flowing through the loop antenna 3 positioned at the one end side (e.g., the left side of the drawing) in the other unit loop antenna array B are opposite from each other.
Since the loop antenna array of the second embodiment includes the multiple loop antenna arrays of the first embodiment, and since d<2a is preferably made in each loop antenna array (see
Since the orientation of the current is just like the above in the second embodiment, when the shape, the area size, and the number of loops of each of the loop antennas 1 to 4 are the same, the sum of m in light of the orientation becomes zero, for example.
In other words, as illustrated in
In other words, according to the second embodiment, a shaper magnetic field area (communication area) than that of the first embodiment can be formed.
Also, in the second embodiment, the shape of the loop antenna is not limited to a circle. The shape may be different in each loop antenna or in each unit loop antenna array. The number of loops is not limited to one. The loop antennas 1 and 2 may not be formed of the continuous conductor wire. In addition, the loop antennas 2 and 3 may be formed of the continuous conductor wire. In other words, even indifferent loop antenna arrays, a pair of the adjacent loop antennas may be formed of the continuous conductor wire.
In addition, as illustrated in
The loop antenna array of the third embodiment includes multiple (four) loop antenna arrays of the first embodiment (
In the loop antenna array, the total number of the loop antenna is 2 to the n-th power (n=3)=8.
In addition, all centers of the loop antennas 1 to 4 are arranged on the same straight line segment (not illustrated).
Moreover, when a group of the 2 to the (n−1)-th power (=four) loop antennas is a unit loop antenna array, the loop antennas 1 to 4 make one unit loop antenna array AB while the loop antennas 5 to 8 make another unit loop antenna array CD.
The direction of the current flowing through the loop antenna 1 positioned at one end side (e.g., the left side of the drawing) of the same straight line segment LL in one unit loop antenna array AB and the direction of the current flowing through the loop antenna 5 positioned at the one end side (e.g., the left side of the drawing) in the other unit loop antenna array CD are opposite from each other.
Since the loop antenna array of the third embodiment includes the multiple loop antenna arrays of the first embodiment, and since d/2<a (d<2a) is preferably made in each loop antenna array (see
Since the orientation of the current is just like the above in the third embodiment, when the shape, the area size, and the number of loops of each of the loop antennas 1 to 8 are the same, the sum of m in light of the orientation becomes zero, for example.
In other words, as illustrated in
In other words, according to the third embodiment, a shaper magnetic field area (communication area) than that of the second embodiment can be formed.
Also, in the third embodiment, the shape of the loop antenna is not limited to a circle. The shape may be different in each loop antenna or in each unit loop antenna array. The number of loops is not limited to one. In addition, anyone or more pairs of a pair of the loop antennas 2 and 3, a pair of the loop antennas 4 and 5, and a pair of the loop antennas 6 and 7 may be formed of the continuous conductor wire. In other words, even in different loop antenna arrays, a pair of the adjacent loop antennas may be formed of the continuous conductor wire. Moreover, the loop antennas 1 to 8 may be formed of the continuous conductor wire.
In addition, as illustrated in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2016-010749 | Jan 2016 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2016/074518 | 8/23/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/126147 | 7/27/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2235163 | Peterson | Mar 1941 | A |
4260990 | Lichtblau | Apr 1981 | A |
4751516 | Lichtblau | Jun 1988 | A |
4866455 | Lichtblau | Sep 1989 | A |
5218371 | Copeland et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5694139 | Saito | Dec 1997 | A |
5914692 | Bowers et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6137447 | Saitoh | Oct 2000 | A |
6388628 | Dettloff | May 2002 | B1 |
6960984 | Vicci | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7342548 | Taniguchi | Mar 2008 | B2 |
8422973 | Takarada | Apr 2013 | B2 |
9276616 | Story | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9450303 | Su | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9899145 | Covic | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10124684 | Merkel | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10177823 | Sasaki | Jan 2019 | B2 |
20010000960 | Dettloff | May 2001 | A1 |
20020027527 | Jiang | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030063034 | Taniguchi | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040183742 | Goff | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040196205 | Shishido | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050134519 | Fukano | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060176624 | Kuroda | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20090179818 | Rhodes | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100001914 | Lavedas | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20120146580 | Kitamura | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120248883 | Konanur | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130069441 | Verghese | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130200721 | Kurs | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130324041 | Pagani | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140111019 | Roy | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150090789 | Kastner | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150091758 | Ikeda | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150138034 | Su | May 2015 | A1 |
20150261985 | Ramsch | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160079658 | Jung | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20170373389 | Mandai | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180205157 | Sasaki | Jul 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1243609 | Feb 2000 | CN |
101356690 | Jan 2009 | CN |
1 128 464 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1 233 367 | Aug 2002 | EP |
10-209737 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2004-328722 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005-102185 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2007-28472 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2007-174570 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2013-125998 | Jun 2013 | JP |
2014-116887 | Jun 2014 | JP |
2014-212383 | Nov 2014 | JP |
2015-508987 | Mar 2015 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, PCT Application No. PCT/JP2016/074921, dated Sep. 20, 2016. |
Office Action, Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-010749, dated Jul. 19, 2016. |
Office Action, Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-250475, dated Nov. 7, 2017. |
Decision to Grant, Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-010749, dated Nov. 22, 2016. |
Decision to Grant, Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-250475, dated Dec. 18, 2017. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT Application No. PCT/JP2016/074518, dated Aug. 2, 2016. |
International Search Report, PCT Application No. PCT/JP2016/074518, dated Oct. 11, 2016. |
Office Action, Chinese Patent Application No. 201680058447.1, dated Sep. 5, 2018. |
Office Action, Chinese Patent Application No. 201680058447.1, dated Feb. 12. 2019. |
European Supplementary Search Report, European Patent Application No. 16886387.6, dated Mar. 29, 2019. |
Jin et al., “Electrically Large Zero-Phase-Shift Line Grid-Array UHF Near-Field RFID Reader Antenna”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, US, vol. 62, No. 4, Apr. 1, 2014, pp. 2201-2208. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180287257 A1 | Oct 2018 | US |