This invention relates to loop-engageable fasteners and related systems and methods.
In woven and knit hook fasteners, hook-forming filaments are included in the structure of a fabric to form upstanding hooks for engaging loops. The cost of woven and knit hook fasteners of this type is a major factor limiting the extent of use of such fasteners.
In one aspect of the invention, a method of making a sheet-form loop-engageable fastener product includes placing a layer of staple fibers on a first side of a substrate, needling fibers of the layer through the substrate by penetrating the substrate with needles that drag portions of the fibers through the substrate during needling, leaving exposed loops of the fibers extending from a second side of the substrate, removing end regions from at least some of the loops to form stems, and forming loop-engageable heads at free ends of at least some of the stems.
Embodiments can include one or more of the following features.
In some embodiments, the method further includes anchoring fibers forming the loops by fusing the fibers to each other on the first side of the substrate, while substantially preventing fusion of the fibers on the second side of the substrate.
In some embodiments, the needles are sized so that no more than one fiber is needled through the substrate per needle.
In some embodiments, the method further includes matching the needles to the fibers so that each of the needles captures no more than one fiber per needle stroke.
In some embodiments, the needles are fork needles, each fork needle having a recess formed between tines.
In some embodiments, the recess of each needle has a width that is about 75% to about 125% of a diameter of a circle that circumscribes the fibers.
In some embodiments, the recess of each needle has a width of 80-100 microns to capture a single fiber having a titer of 60-110 dtex.
In some embodiments, the needles are 38 gauge fork needles and the fibers have a titer of 70 dtex.
In some embodiments, the needles are 38 gauge fork needles and the fibers have a titer of 110 dtex.
In some embodiments, the fibers are drawn fibers.
In some embodiments, the fibers have a titer of 60-600 dtex.
In some embodiments, the fibers have a titer of 100-600 dtex.
In some embodiments, the staple fibers are disposed on the substrate in a carded, unbonded state.
In some embodiments, the substrate includes a nonwoven web.
In some embodiments, the nonwoven web includes a spunbond web.
In some embodiments, the loops formed on the second side of the substrate are formed such that substantially only one loop protrudes through each hole in the substrate so that the loops extend substantially perpendicular to the substrate.
In some embodiments, removing end regions from at least some of the loops to form stems includes cutting the end regions off with a blade.
In some embodiments, forming loop-engageable heads at the ends of at least some of the stems includes melting the ends of the at least some of the stems.
In some embodiments, melting the ends of at least some of the stems includes applying heat with a hot knife.
In some embodiments, removing end regions and forming loop-engageable heads are performed substantially simultaneously using a single device.
In some embodiments, the formed loops extend 2-8 mm from the substrate.
In some embodiments, the loop-engageable heads have an average diameter that is at least 50% larger than a diameter of a circle that circumscribes the fibers.
In some embodiments, the loop-engageable heads have an average height that is at least 50% larger than a diameter of a circle that circumscribes the fibers.
In some embodiments, needling fibers of the layer through the substrate includes needling fibers to form taller loops and needling fibers to form shorter loops having a second height, and end regions of the taller loops are removed to form the stems.
In some embodiments, needling fibers to form taller loops and needling fibers to form shorter loops having a second height includes using different sized needles disposed along a common needle board.
In some embodiments, needling fibers to form taller loops and needling fibers to form shorter loops having a second height includes using different sized needles disposed along different needle boards of a single needle loom.
In some embodiments, needling fibers to form taller loops and needling fibers to form shorter loops having a second height includes using different sized needles disposed in different needle looms.
In some embodiments, needling fibers to form taller loops and needling fibers to form shorter loops having a second height includes using different needle looms having the same sized needles and moving each needle board of each needle loom different distance.
In some embodiments, needling fibers to form taller loops and needling fibers to form shorter loops having a second height includes using crown needles and forked needles disposed along a common needle board.
In some embodiments, the loops and the stems with loop-engageable heads are substantially evenly distributed along the substrate.
In some embodiments, the ratio of loops to stems with loop-engageable heads disposed along the substrate is 1:1 to 3:1.
In some embodiments, the first height is 5-8 mm and the second height is 2-4 mm.
In some embodiments, at least some of the loop-engageable heads extend from the substrate to a distance that is within 10% of a distance that the loops extend from the substrate.
In some embodiments, discrete patterns of larger loops are formed during needling to form pairs of stems with loop-engageable heads along the substrate.
In some embodiments, needling the fibers of the layer through the substrate includes selectively needling the fibers to form discrete regions of loops.
In some embodiments, the discrete regions include islands that include groupings of multiple loops that are surrounded by regions free of loops.
In some embodiments, the discrete regions include lanes of loops, the lanes being separated by parallel regions that are free of loops.
In some embodiments, selectively needling the fibers to form discrete regions of loops includes moving needles different distances with respect to the substrate such that a first portion of needles push some fibers through the substrate to form the loops and a second portion of needles do not penetrate the substrate.
In some embodiments, selectively needing the fibers to form discrete regions of loops includes using needle boards having discrete regions of needles that are separated by regions that are free of needles.
In some embodiments, selectively needing the fibers to form discrete regions of loops includes passing the substrate and fibers through more than one needle loom, each needle loom having a different pattern of needles disposed along a needle board.
In another aspect of the invention, a sheet-form loop product includes a substrate and staple fibers anchored on a first side of the substrate and having exposed fiber stems with loop-engageable heads extending from a second side of the substrate, where the fibers on the first side of the substrate are fused together to a relatively greater extent than the fibers on the second side of the substrate and pairs of the fibers extend through respective openings in the substrate.
In a further aspect of the invention, a processing machine includes a needling station to penetrate a substrate with needles to drag portions of staple fibers disposed along a first side of the substrate through the substrate in order to leave exposed loops of the fibers extending from a second side of the substrate, a device configured to remove loop-ends of the loops to form the loops into stems, and a melting station configured to melt free ends of the stems to form loop-engageable heads at the ends of at least some of the stems.
Embodiments can include one or more of the following features.
In some embodiments, the device configured to remove loop-ends includes a blade.
In some embodiments, the melting station includes a heated blade.
In some embodiments, the needles include tines defining a recess therebetween, the recess being sized to capture no more than one of the fibers.
In some embodiments, the recess has a width of 100 to 200 microns.
In some embodiments, the processing machine further includes a laminating station to anchor fibers forming the loops by fusing the fibers to each other on the first side of the substrate.
In an additional aspect of the invention, a processing machine includes a needling station to penetrate a substrate with needles to drag portions of staple fibers disposed along a first side of the substrate through the substrate in order to leave exposed loops of the fibers extending from a second side of the substrate, and a device configured to remove loop-ends of the loops to form the loops into stems and to melt free ends of the stems to form loop-engageable heads at the ends of at least some of the stems.
Embodiments can include one or more of the following features.
In some embodiments, the device is configured to remove the loop-ends of the loops and melt the free ends of the stems to form the loop-engageable heads substantially simultaneously.
In certain embodiments, the device configured to remove loop-ends of the loops to form the loops into stems and to melt free ends of the stems to form loop-engageable heads at the ends of at least some of the stems includes a hot wire.
In some embodiments, the processing machine further includes a laminating station to anchor fibers forming the loops by fusing the fibers to each other on the first side of the substrate.
Embodiments can include one or more of the following advantages.
Methods described herein can be used to form loop-engageable fastener products that are relatively inexpensive, drapeable and strong. The sheet-form loop-engageable fastener products formed in this manner can also have a much greater width or surface area than similar fastener products formed using conventional techniques, such as continuous molding techniques. Thus, the methods described herein can be particularly advantageous for applications in which large widths or surface areas are preferred (e.g., for fastening siding to a home, for fastening membrane roofing, etc.).
Pushing one fiber per needle through the substrate can create a more even distribution of fiber loops that can be sheared and melted to form mushroom-shaped fastener elements. Since the loops, and therefore the resulting stems, are substantially evenly distributed during the needling process, it is less likely that adjacent stems will be in contact when the stems are melted to form mushroom caps, thus reducing the likelihood of adjacent fastener elements melting together. Forming a single loop per needle can also help ensure that the loops stand proud and thus prevent multiple loops from crossing each other. This likewise helps to ensure that when mushroom-shaped fastener elements are formed, the needled fibers do not melt together.
Needling the fibers in a manner such that only one fiber per needle is pushed through the substrate can also increase (e.g., maximize) the number of fibers that remain on the backside of the substrate. By increasing the number of fibers that remain on the backside of the substrate, more of those fibers are available for bonding to and anchoring the fibers that are pushed through to the front side of the substrate in the form of loops. As a result, the fibers that are pushed through to the front side of the substrate can be more securely anchored to the substrate, which results in higher closure strength.
Additionally, by creating the mushroom-shaped fastener elements in the manner described above, it is possible to manufacture materials having loop-engageable fastener elements disposed in various patterns and/or configurations in a more cost effective manner than many conventional techniques. For example, forming the sheet-form loop-engageable fastener product to include discrete regions of mushroom-shaped fastener elements can reduce the amount of fibers required to create the fastener product. In addition, the discrete regions can be shaped, designed and/or positioned along the fastener product to achieve various aesthetic and/or functional design goals.
Pushing loops through substrate to different degrees allows for creating a fastener product including both loops and loop-engageable fastener elements. Such a fastener product can be used to engage a hook material, a loop material, or a similar hook/loop material. Additionally or alternatively, the fastener product can be self-engaging (e.g., foldable to engage itself).
Using drawn staple fibers can result in mushroom-shaped fastener elements that are highly loop-engageable because the alignment of the polymer chains in the drawn fibers causes them to melt substantially uniformly to provide a wider engaging portion.
Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
In some aspects of the invention, methods of forming mushroom-shaped loop-engageable fastener products include placing a layer of staple fibers on a first side of a substrate, needling fibers of the layer through the substrate by penetrating the substrate with needles that drag portions of the fibers through the substrate to form loops extending from a second side of the substrate, removing end regions from at least some of the loops to form stems, and forming loop-engageable heads at free ends of at least some of the stems. Such methods can be used to produce relatively inexpensive, flexible, drapeable, and strong loop-engageable fastener products. In addition, the fastener products can be formed to have significantly larger widths and surface areas than many loop-engageable fastener products formed using continuous molding techniques that utilize mold rolls, which tend to bow above a certain length.
Before cross-lapping, the carded fibers still appear in bands or streaks of single fiber types, corresponding to the fibrous balls fed to carding station 30 from the different feed bins. Cross-lapping, which normally involves a 90-degree reorientation of line direction, overlaps the fiber layer upon itself and is adjustable to establish the width of fiber layer fed into a second carding station 74. In this example, the cross-lapper output width is set to approximately equal the width of the carrier into which the fibers will be needled. Cross-lapper 72 may have a lapper apron that traverses a floor apron in a reciprocating motion. The cross-lapper 72 lays carded webs of, for example, about 80 inch (2.0 meter) width and about one-half inch (1.3 centimeter) thickness on the floor apron to build up several layers of criss-crossed web, forming a layer of, for instance, about 80 inches (2.0 meters) in width and about 4 inches (10 centimeters) in thickness, that includes four double layers of carded web.
During carding, the fibers are separated and combed into a cloth-like mat consisting primarily of parallel fibers. With nearly all of its fibers extending in the carding direction, the mat has some strength when pulled in the carding direction but almost no strength when pulled in the carding cross direction, as cross direction strength results only from a few entanglements between fibers. During cross-lapping, the carded fiber mat is laid in an overlapping zigzag pattern, creating a mat 10 of multiple layers of alternating diagonal fibers. The diagonal layers, which extend in the carding cross direction, extend more across the apron than they extend along its length. Cross-lapping the web before the second carding process provides several tangible benefits. For example, it enhances the blending of the fiber composition during the second carding stage. It also allows for relatively easy adjustment of web width and basis weight, simply by changing cross-lapping parameters.
The second carding station 74 takes the cross-lapped mat of fibers and cards them a second time. The feedroll drive consists of two 3-inch feed rolls and a 3-inch cleaning roll 56 on a 13-inch lickerin 58, feeding a 60-inch main roll 76 through an 8-inch angle stripper 60. The fibers are worked by six 8-inch worker rolls 78, the last five of which are paired with 3-inch strippers. A 50-inch finisher doffer 80 transfers the carded web to a condenser 82 having two 8-inch condenser rolls 84, from which the web is combed onto a non-woven carrier sheet 14 fed from a spool 16. The condenser typically increases the basis weight of the web and reduces the orientation of the fibers to remove directionality in the strength or other properties of the finished product.
The fibers are coarse, crimped polypropylene fibers having a titer of 60-600 dtex (e.g., 70-110 dtex) that are about a three-inch (75 millimeters) staple length. The use of such coarse fibers helps to ensure that the loops, stems, and mushroom-shaped fastener elements produced in subsequent processing steps stand straight up during manufacturing. The fibers have a round cross-sectional shape and are crimped at about 10-13 crimps per inch (4-5 crimps per centimeter). The fibers are in a drawn, molecular oriented state, having been drawn under cooling conditions that enable molecular orientation to occur. Fibers can be drawn to a variety of draw ratios. In some cases, the draw ratio is 1:4.5 to 1:5.5, pre-drawn length to final length. The draw ratio has been found useful for altering the subsequent formation of mushroom-shaped fastener elements. Suitable polypropylene fibers are available from Asota Ges.m.b.H. of Linz, Austria (www.Asota.com) as type G10C.
The carrier sheet 14 is typically a nonwoven web (e.g., a spunbond web). Spunbond webs, and other suitable nonwoven webs, include continuous filaments that are entangled and fused together at their intersections (e.g., by hot calendaring). In order to adequately support needled loops and subsequently formed mushroom-shaped fastener elements that protrude from the carrier sheet 14, the carrier sheet 14 is relatively heavier than substrate materials that are used to form certain conventional loop materials, and has a basis weight that ranges from 30-100 grams per square meter (gsm). In some embodiments, the carrier sheet 14 has a basis weight of about 68 gsm (2.0 ounces per square yard (osy)). While maintaining proper structural requirements, the carrier sheet 14 is also relatively lightweight and inexpensive as compared to materials used to form many woven and knit hook products. To optimize anchoring of the hooks during subsequent lamination, it is desirable that the fibers fuse not only to themselves on the back side of the carrier sheet 14, but also to the filaments of the carrier sheet 14. Suitable carrier sheet materials include nylons, polyesters, polyamides, polypropylenes, EVA, and their copolymers.
The carrier sheet 14 may be supplied as a single continuous length, or as multiple, parallel strips. For particularly wide webs, it may be necessary or cost effective to introduce two or more parallel sheets, either adjacent or slightly overlapping. The parallel sheets may be unconnected or joined along a mutual edge. The carded, uniformly blended layer of fibers from condenser 82 is carried up conveyor 86 on carrier sheet 14 and into needling station 18 in the form of a mat 10. As the fiber layer or mat 10 enters the needling station, it has no stability other than what may have been imparted by carding and cross-lapping. In other words, the fibers are not pre-needled or felted prior to reaching a subsequent needling station 18. In this state, the fiber layer or mat 10 is not suitable for spooling or accumulating.
In the needling station 18, the carrier sheet 14 and fiber layer 10 are needle-punched from the fiber side. Forked needles are guided through a stripping plate above the fibers, and draw fibers through the carrier sheet 14 to form loops on the opposite side.
During needling, the carrier sheet 14 is supported on a bed of bristles extending from a driven support belt or brush apron 22 that moves with the carrier sheet 14 through the needling station 18. Reaction pressure during needling is provided by a stationary reaction plate 24 underlying the support belt or brush apron 22. The needling station 18 typically needles the fiber-covered carrier sheet 14 with an overall penetration density of about 80 to 160 punches per square centimeter. During needling, the thickness of the carded fiber layer 10 only decreases by about half, as compared with felting processes in which such a fiber layer thickness decreases by one or more orders of magnitude. As fiber basis weight decreases, needling density may need to be increased.
The needling station 18 may be a “structuring loom” configured to subject the fiber layer 10 and carrier sheet 14 to a random velouring process. Thus, the needles penetrate a moving bed of bristles of the brush apron 22. The brush apron 22 may have a bristle density of about 2000 to 3000 bristles per square inch (310 to 465 bristles per square centimeter) (e.g., about 2570 bristles per square inch (400 per square centimeter)). The bristles are typically each about 0.018 inch (0.46 millimeter) in diameter and about 20 millimeters long, and are preferably straight. The bristles may be formed of any suitable material, for example 6/12 nylon. Suitable brushes may be purchased from Stratosphere, Inc., a division of Howard Brush Co., and retrofitted onto DILO and other random velouring looms. Generally, the brush apron moves at the desired line speed.
As discussed below, the forked needles of the needling station 18 are typically sized to match the size of the intended fibers of the fiber layer 10, or vice versa, to ensure that only one fiber is typically needled through the carrier sheet 14 per needle. More specifically, the width of a recess formed between tines of the forked needle is about 0.75 to about 1.25 times the average diameter of the fiber or, in the case of fibers that do not have a circular cross-section, about 0.75 to about 1.25 times the diameter of the smallest imaginary circle capable of circumscribing the fiber.
As the needle 34 pierces the carrier sheet 14, as shown in
When the needle 34 is retracted, as shown in
As mentioned above, the needles 34 used to push the fibers 12 through the carrier sheet 14 each have a recess 36 that is sized and configured so that only one fiber 12 is typically captured by each needle when the needles 34 penetrate through the fiber mat 10 and the carrier sheet 14.
Referring again to
By contrast, as shown in
Referring back to
During lamination, the heated, needled web 88 is trained about a 20 inch (50 centimeter) diameter hot can 96 against which four idler rolls 98 of five inch (13 centimeter) solid diameter, and a driven, rubber roll 100 of 18 inch (46 centimeter) diameter, rotate under controlled pressure. Idler rolls 98 are optional and may be omitted if desired. Alternatively, light tension in the needled web 88 can supply a light and consistent pressure between the needled web 88 and the hot can 96 surface prior to the nip with rubber roll 100, to help to soften the bonding fiber surfaces prior to lamination pressure. The rubber roll 100 presses the needled web 88 against the surface of hot can 96 uniformly over a relatively long ‘kiss’ or contact area, bonding the fibers over substantially the entire back side of the web.
The rubber roll 100 is cooled, as discussed below, to prevent overheating and crushing or fusing of the loop fibers on the front surface of the needled web 88, thereby allowing the loop fibers to remain exposed and standing upright so that the loop-ends can be removed to form stems and then the stems melted, as described below, to form mushroom-shaped fastener elements. The bonding pressure between the rubber roll 100 and the hot can 96 is quite low, in the range of about 1-50 pounds per square inch (psi) (70-3500 gsm) or less, typically about 15 to 40 psi (1050 to 2800 gsm) (e.g., about 25 psi (1750 gsm)). In order to bond the fibers 12 and carrier sheet 14, the surface of the hot can 96 is typically maintained at a temperature of about 306 degrees Fahrenheit (150 degrees Celsius). The needled web 88 is trained about an angle of around 300 degrees around the hot can 96, resulting in a dwell time against the hot can of about four seconds to avoid overly melting the needled web. The hot can 96 can have a compliant outer surface, or be in the form of a belt.
The back surface of the loop material leaving the nip (i.e., the laminated web 89) is fused and relatively flat. The individual fibers tend to maintain their longitudinal molecular orientation through the bond points. The bond point network is therefore random and sufficiently dense to effectively anchor the fiber portions extending through the non-woven carrier sheet to the front side to form engageable loop formations. However, the bond point network is not so dense that the laminated web 89 becomes air-impermeable. Due to the distribution of bond points, the resulting loop-engageable fastener product will typically have a soft hand and working flexibility for use in applications where textile properties are desired. In other applications it may be acceptable or desirable to fuse the fibers to form a solid mass on the back side of the laminated web 89. The fused network of bond points creates a very strong, dimensionally stable laminated web 89 of fused fibers across the non-working side of the laminated web 89 that is still sufficiently flexible for many uses.
Referring back to
As described above, the fibers 12 are typically coarse, drawn fibers (e.g., polypropylene fibers having a titer of 70-110 dtex). Due in part to the coarseness of the fibers, the stems generally stand up straight after having the loop-ends removed instead of falling down limp or substantially bending.
Referring back to
Since the fibers 12 are drawn polypropylene fibers, the fibers tend to have increased strength and stiffness, and the polymer chains of the fibers are typically aligned in the longitudinal direction. Therefore, as shown in
The shape of the mushroom-shaped fastener element heads depends on the cross-sectional profile of the fibers used in the fiber mat 10. Typically, the final shape of the mushroom-shaped fastener element heads is similar to the shape of the fiber, but larger. Therefore, as shown in
The shape and size of the mushroom-shaped fastener element heads can typically be adjusted by altering the heat applied to the stems, the duration of time that the stems are subjected to the heat (i.e., the speed at which the web is passed through the melting station 103), and/or an external cooling process that can be applied. Subjecting the stems to increased heat or reducing the speed that the stem web 91 passes through melting station 103 typically creates a larger mushroom-shaped fastener element head. Although the mushroom-shaped fastener elements can be formed using many different operating parameters, it has been found that lower temperature and prolonged exposure time typically leads to nicely formed mushroom-shaped fastener elements.
Referring back to
In some cases, the backup roll 56 has a pattern of raised areas that mesh with dimples in the embossing roll 54, such that embossing results in a pattern of raised hills or convex regions on the front side, with corresponding concave regions on the non-working side of the mushroom-shaped fastener web 95, such that the embossed web 97 has a greater effective thickness than the pre-embossed mushroom-shaped fastener web 95.
As shown in
Referring back to
While certain embodiments have been described, other embodiments are possible.
While the process above has been described as forming a continuous array of mushroom-shaped fastener elements along the width of the carrier sheet, other patterns can be formed. In some embodiments, for needling longitudinally discontinuous regions of the material, such as to create discrete loop regions as discussed further below, the needling station can include needle boards populated with discrete lanes of needles separated by wide, needle-free lanes. Such needle looms are available from Oerlikon Neumag Austria GmbH of Linz, Austria, for example. Alternatively, in some embodiments, “on the fly” variable penetration needling looms, in conjunction with needle boards populated discontinuously, can be used to either form loops in only discrete areas along the carrier sheet or to alternatively to form loops of different heights. Variable penetration can be accomplished by altering the penetration depth of the needles during needling, including needling to depths at which the needles do not penetrate the carrier sheet. Such variable penetration needle looms are commercially available from Oerlikon (e.g., model no. NL11/SE) and Dilo, for example.
In addition to creating discrete lanes of mushroom-shaped fastener elements, other types of patterns can be formed. As shown in
Once two sets of loops are formed, the needled web moves on to the loop-end removing station. Unlike the process described above where substantially all of the loop-ends are removed to form stems, the loop-end removing station, due to the positioning of the blade device, only removes the loop-ends of the taller of the two different height loops (e.g., the 8 mm loop). After removing the loop-ends of the taller loops, the web contains both loops and stems. The loop and stem web can then move on to the melting station. Again, instead of processing both sets of loops, in the melting station only some of the stems (e.g., the stems formed of the 8 mm loops and not the smaller 4 mm loops) are melted at the ends to form mushroom heads. After removing the ends from some of the loops (e.g., from the 8 mm loops) to form stems and then melting the stems to form mushroom-shaped loop-engageable fastener elements, the resulting self-engaging touch faster material has loops that are about the same height or only slightly shorter than mushroom-shaped fastener elements. For example, the loops can be approximately 4 mm tall and the mushroom-shaped loop-engageable fastener elements can be approximately 5 mm tall. The distribution of loops and stems with mushroom-shaped fastener elements is controlled and can be adjusted by needling more or fewer of the taller loops. The ratio of loops to stems with mushroom-shaped fastener elements is typically about 1:1, but can be adjusted to include more or fewer loops. For example, the ratio of loops to stems can be from 1:3 to 3:1. In some examples, the melting station uses laser cutters to melt the ends of the stems in order to reduce the amount of residual heat which could possibly melt or deform the smaller 4 mm loops.
Although the process above has been described as including one needling station having a needle loom that can selectively needle fibers to form different sized loops, other methods for forming different sized loops can be performed. For example, in some embodiments, the process includes more than one (e.g., 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or more) needling stations having needle looms that are used to needle fibers through the carrier sheet, and in some cases, to needle fibers through the carrier sheet to different distances to form different sized loops. In some embodiments, each needling station includes more than one (e.g., 2, 4, or more) needle boards.
In some embodiments, the needle looms of the different needling stations include different sized needles to form different sized loops. The different sized needles can be distributed along a single needle board to form the different sized loops. In some embodiments, multiple needle boards are used that each include substantially only a certain sized needle. In some such embodiments, needles that are disposed along one particular needle board are a different size than the needles disposed along another needle board. Therefore, as the fibers and carrier sheet pass through multiple needling stations and/or pass by multiple needle boards within a single needling station sequentially, the different sized needles along the respective needle boards form different sized loops.
Alternatively or additionally, in some embodiments, forked needles and crown needles are both disposed along a needle board to form different height loops. Crown needles typically have barbs positioned along the sides of the needles, the barbs being spaced apart from an end of the needle to capture fibers along the side of the needle as opposed to a recess at the end of a forked needle. Therefore, due to the height difference of each of the respective needles, when a needle board including a distribution of similarly crown needles and forked needles penetrates a fiber mat, loops of different heights are formed.
Although the needling station has been described as including a bed of bristles extending from a driven support belt of brush apron that moves with the carrier sheet, other types of supports can be used. In some embodiments, the carrier sheet is supported by a screen or stitching plate that defines holes aligned with the needles, or alternatively, by a lamella plate.
Although the needling station has been described as including 38 gauge forked needles having a recess width of 100 microns, other needles having a larger recess can be used. For example, in some embodiments, needles having recess widths of 150-200 microns are used to capture fibers. As discussed above, the needle to be used will typically depend on the size of the fibers to be needled. In many cases, the needles will be sized to ensure that no more than one fiber is typically captured in the recess of each needle.
While many of the embodiments discussed above describe capturing only one fiber in each needle, in certain implementations, the needles are sized so that more than one fiber can be captured in each needle.
In addition, while all of the needled fibers are illustrated as forming loops in the embodiments discussed above, it should be understood that, in certain cases, the fibers will be needled through the substrate in a manner such that a loop will not be formed. For example, some of the fibers may be needled through the substrate in a manner such that only one end of the fiber remains on the back side of the substrate while the other end of the fiber is needled through the substrate, effectively forming a long stem. In such a case, the loop-end removing station will trim that fiber to the desired length and the melting station will melt the free end of that single fiber to form a mushroom-shaped loop-engageable fastener element.
Although the lamination station has been described as being positioned between the needling station and the loop-end removing station, the lamination station can alternatively be positioned at other locations. For example, in some embodiments, the lamination station is positioned after the loop-end removing station or after the melting station.
Although the lamination station has been described as including hot roller nips, other types of laminators can be used. In some embodiments, for example, a flatbed fabric laminator is used to apply a controlled lamination pressure for a considerable dwell time. Such flatbed laminators are available from Glenro Inc. in Paterson, N.J.
In certain embodiments, the finished loop product is passed through a cooler after lamination.
Although the loop-end removing station has been described as including a blade device, other devices that are capable of removing or trimming the ends of the loops can alternatively or additionally be used. Some examples of other suitable devices include laser cutting devices, hot wire knives, hot rolls, and radiant heating devices.
Although the melting station has been described as a heated blade that melts the ends of the stems by contact or by radiant heating, other heating devices or methods can alternatively or additionally be used. Some examples of other suitable heating devices include hot rolls, hot wire knives, laser cutting devices, flame generating devices, plasma devices, and other radiant heating devices.
Although the melting station has been described as including a heating device that is 400-600 degrees F., the heating device can be heated to temperatures that are lower or higher than 400-600 degrees F. For example, in some embodiments, the external temperature is 300-400 degrees F. (148-205 degrees C.) or greater than 600 degrees F. (315 degrees C.).
Although the process above has been described as having a loop-end removing station and a melting station, in some embodiments, a single device can be used to remove the loop-ends to create stems and to melt the free ends of the stems nearly simultaneously. For example, laser cutting devices, hot wire knives, hot rolls, and radiant heating devices can be used in this manner.
Although the process above has been described as including accumulators between various stations, in some cases, web material can move directly between stations without accumulation. In some embodiments, no accumulators are included between any of the various stations.
Although the fibers have been described as being polypropylene, other fiber materials can alternatively or additionally be used. For example, other fiber materials that can be used include polyolefins, polyesters, polyamides, and acrylics or mixtures, alloys, copolymers and/or co-extrusions of polyolefins, polyesters, polyamides, and acrylics. In some embodiments, the fibers are bicomponent fibers that are formed of high-density polyethylene and polypropylene. It has been found that such bicomponent fibers produce particularly high quality mushroom heads. It will be understood that the laminating station and the melting station will be operated at a temperature that exceeds the melting temperature of the selected fiber material to ensure that the fibers are properly anchored and the mushroom-shaped fastener element heads are properly formed.
Although the fibers have been described as being cylindrical or having a round cross-sectional profile, other fiber shapes can be used. In some embodiments, the fibers have a cross-sectional profile that further increases stiffness and enhances the ability of the fibers to stand up straight after being needled through the substrate. Such cross-sectional profiles include polygon-shaped profiles (e.g., triangles, rectangles, pentagons, hexagons), polygons having curved sides-shaped profiles (e.g., Reuleaux polygons), or polylobal-shaped profiles. As discussed above, the cross-sectional profile of the fibers can influence the final shape of mushroom-shaped fastener elements (i.e., the cross sectional profile of the mushroom-shaped fastener elements is typically the same as that of the fiber, but larger). Non-cylindrical fibers can be used to form non-cylindrical mushroom-shaped fastener elements having particular advantages. For example, in some embodiments, quadrilobe-shaped fibers are used so that the resulting fastener elements after melting form grapple hook-like fastener elements. When such non-cylindrical fibers are used, instead of being sized to match the diameter of the fibers, the recess of the forked needle is sized to match the diameter of the smallest imaginary circle that could circumscribe the cross-sectional profile of the fibers.
Although the carrier sheet has been described as being a spunbond web made from a polymer, other materials may alternatively or additionally be used. For example, in some embodiments, the carrier sheet is formed of a thin film, paper, a textile such as scrim, a lightweight cotton sheet, or another non-woven, woven, or knit material.
In some embodiments, the carrier sheet is point bonded. The spunbond web may include a non-random pattern of fused areas, each fused area being surrounded by unfused areas. The fused areas may have any desired shape, e.g., diamonds or ovals, and are generally quite small, for example on the order of several millimeters.
In some embodiments, a pre-printed carrier sheet may be employed to provide graphic images visible from the front side of the finished product. This can be advantageous, for example, for loop-engageable materials to be used on children's products, such as disposable diapers. In such cases, child-friendly graphic images can be provided on the loop-engageable material that is permanently bonded across the front of the diaper chassis to form an engagement zone for the diaper tabs. The image can be pre-printed on either surface of the carrier sheet, but is generally printed on the front side. An added film may alternatively be pre-printed to add graphics, particularly if acceptable graphic clarity cannot be obtained on a lightweight carrier sheet such as a spunbond web.
Although the process above has been described as including embossing the loop-engageable fastener material to provide a textured pattern on the fastener material, in some embodiments, the resulting loop-engageable material is not embossed.
Although the process above has been described as including slitting the material into smaller rolls, in some embodiments, the fastener material is undivided and remains as large rolls. Undivided, larger rolls can be used for applications requiring a fastener material having a large surface area (e.g., for fastening home siding or roofing material). In some cases, large rolls can be up to 2-3 meters wide.
While the staple fibers have been described as being laminated to themselves and to the carrier sheet during lamination, in some embodiments, a binder can be used to anchor the fibers. The binder may be applied in liquid or powder form, and may even be pre-coated on the fiber side of the carrier web before the fibers are applied. Alternatively or additionally, if desired, a backing sheet can be introduced between the hot can and the needled web, such that the backing sheet is laminated over the back surface of the needled web while the fibers are bonded under pressure in the nip. Polymer backing layers or binders may be selected from among suitable polyethylenes, polyesters, EVA, polypropylenes, and their co-polymers.
In some embodiments, advance per stroke is limited due to a number of constraints, including needle deflection and potential needle breakage. Thus, it may be difficult to accommodate increases in line speed and obtain an economical throughput by adjusting the advance per stroke. As a result, the holes pierced by the needles may become elongated, due to the travel of the carrier sheet while the needle is interacting with the carrier sheet (the “dwell time”). This elongation is generally undesirable, as it reduces the amount of support provided to the base of each of the loop structures by the surrounding substrate, and may adversely affect resistance to loop pull-out. Moreover, this elongation will tend to reduce the mechanical integrity of the carrier sheet due to excessive drafting (i.e., stretching of the carrier sheet in the machine direction and corresponding shrinkage in the cross-machine direction).
Elongation of the holes may be reduced or eliminated by moving the needles in a generally elliptical path (e.g., when viewed from the side). This elliptical path is shown schematically in
During elliptical needling, the horizontal travel of the needle board is generally a function of needle penetration depth, vertical stroke length, carrier sheet thickness, and advance per stroke, and is typically roughly equivalent to the distance that the carrier sheet advances during the dwell time. Generally, at a given value of needle penetration and carrier sheet thickness, horizontal stroke increases with increasing advance per stroke. At a fixed advance per stroke, the horizontal stroke generally increases as depth of penetration and web thickness increases.
While the process above has been described above as including a first carding station, a cross-lapper, and a second carding station, other fiber preparation components and/or methods can be used. In some embodiments, instead of a first carding station and a cross lapper, a fiber bale opening machine and a fiber blending machine are used to prepare fibers and provide them to a single carding station.
While embodiments discussed above describe the formation of relatively short loop-engageable fastener elements, it should be understood that fastener elements of any of various sizes can be formed using the processes described herein.
In some embodiments, the materials of the loop-engageable product are selected for other desired properties. In some cases, the hook fibers, carrier web, and backing are all formed of polypropylene, making the finished hook product readily recyclable. In another example, the hook fibers, carrier web and backing are all of a biodegradable material, such that the finished hook product is more environmentally friendly. High tenacity fibers of biodegradable polylactic acid are available, for example, from Cargill Dow LLC under the trade name NATUREWORKS.
While the mushroom-shaped fastener elements discussed above have been described as loop-engageable fastener elements, in some embodiments, the mushroom-shaped fastener elements are configured to engage other mushroom-shaped fastener elements and are utilized in self-engaging fastener products.
Other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. application Ser. No. 61/527,361, filed on Aug. 25, 2011, which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
RE18001 | Rayner | Mar 1931 | E |
2706324 | Cogovan | Apr 1955 | A |
3047444 | Harwood | Jul 1962 | A |
3348992 | Cochran, II | Oct 1967 | A |
3408417 | Sogawa et al. | Oct 1968 | A |
3496260 | Guenther et al. | Feb 1970 | A |
3535178 | Parlin et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
3577607 | Ikoma et al. | May 1971 | A |
3674618 | Spann | Jul 1972 | A |
3694867 | Stumpf | Oct 1972 | A |
3704191 | Buresh et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
3705065 | Stumpf | Dec 1972 | A |
3708361 | Stumpf | Jan 1973 | A |
3819462 | Starr et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3822162 | Stumpf | Jul 1974 | A |
3940525 | Ballard | Feb 1976 | A |
3949128 | Ostermeier | Apr 1976 | A |
3950587 | Colijn et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4001472 | Thomas et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4010302 | Anderson et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4035533 | Chambley | Jul 1977 | A |
4116892 | Schwarz | Sep 1978 | A |
4131704 | Erickson et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4154885 | Tecl et al. | May 1979 | A |
4154889 | Platt | May 1979 | A |
4169303 | Lemelson | Oct 1979 | A |
4192086 | Sichak | Mar 1980 | A |
4223059 | Schwarz | Sep 1980 | A |
4258094 | Benedyk | Mar 1981 | A |
4258097 | Benedyk | Mar 1981 | A |
4295251 | Tatham et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4315965 | Mason et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4320167 | Wishman | Mar 1982 | A |
4324824 | Narens et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4342802 | Pickens, Jr. et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4363845 | Hartmann | Dec 1982 | A |
4377889 | Tatham et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4379189 | Platt | Apr 1983 | A |
4389442 | Pickens, Jr. et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4389443 | Thomas et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4391866 | Pickens, Jr. et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4418104 | Kiyomura et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4439476 | Guild | Mar 1984 | A |
4446189 | Romanek | May 1984 | A |
4451314 | Knoke et al. | May 1984 | A |
4451315 | Miyazaki | May 1984 | A |
4490425 | Knoke et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4521472 | Gold | Jun 1985 | A |
4536439 | Forsten | Aug 1985 | A |
4600605 | Nakai et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4600618 | Raychok, Jr. et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4609581 | Ott | Sep 1986 | A |
4645699 | Neveu | Feb 1987 | A |
4654246 | Provost et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4750443 | Blaustein et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4761318 | Ott et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4770917 | Tochacek et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4931343 | Becker et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4973326 | Wood et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5032122 | Noel et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5066289 | Polski | Nov 1991 | A |
5080951 | Guthrie | Jan 1992 | A |
5144730 | Dilo | Sep 1992 | A |
5216790 | Eschenbach | Jun 1993 | A |
5254194 | Ott et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5256231 | Gorman et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5265954 | Keil | Nov 1993 | A |
5304162 | Kuen | Apr 1994 | A |
5307616 | Goineau et al. | May 1994 | A |
5320890 | Anton et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5326612 | Goulait | Jul 1994 | A |
5379501 | Goineau | Jan 1995 | A |
5380313 | Goulait et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5380580 | Rogers et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5382461 | Wu | Jan 1995 | A |
5383872 | Roessler et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5386595 | Kuen et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5391424 | Kolzer | Feb 1995 | A |
5403302 | Roessler et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5407439 | Goulait | Apr 1995 | A |
5407722 | Peake, III et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5417902 | Bennie et al. | May 1995 | A |
5423789 | Kuen | Jun 1995 | A |
5447590 | Gilpatrick | Sep 1995 | A |
5449530 | Peake, III et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5459991 | Nabeshima et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5470417 | Goulait | Nov 1995 | A |
5476702 | Datta et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5500268 | Billarant | Mar 1996 | A |
5515583 | Higashinaka | May 1996 | A |
5518795 | Kennedy et al. | May 1996 | A |
5531732 | Wood | Jul 1996 | A |
5542942 | Kline et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5547531 | Allen et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5554239 | Datta et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5569233 | Goulait | Oct 1996 | A |
5571097 | Seth | Nov 1996 | A |
5595567 | King et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5599601 | Polski et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5603708 | Seth | Feb 1997 | A |
5605729 | Mody et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5611789 | Seth | Mar 1997 | A |
5611791 | Gorman et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5614232 | Torigoe et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5614281 | Jackson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5615460 | Weirich et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5616155 | Kronzer | Apr 1997 | A |
5616394 | Gorman et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5620779 | Levy et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5622578 | Thomas | Apr 1997 | A |
5624427 | Bergman et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5630896 | Corbin et al. | May 1997 | A |
5643397 | Gorman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5647864 | Allen et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5654070 | Billarant | Aug 1997 | A |
5660911 | Tesch | Aug 1997 | A |
5669593 | Kirchner | Sep 1997 | A |
5669900 | Bullwinkel et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669901 | LaFortune et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5672222 | Eschenbach | Sep 1997 | A |
5685756 | Noda | Nov 1997 | A |
5686163 | Tsubata et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5692949 | Sheffield et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695845 | Ogawa et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699593 | Jackson | Dec 1997 | A |
5707707 | Burnes et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5707906 | Eschenbach | Jan 1998 | A |
5722968 | Datta et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732453 | Dilo et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5736214 | Billarant | Apr 1998 | A |
5759926 | Pike et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5763041 | Leak et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766723 | Oborny et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5773120 | Deka et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5786060 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5814390 | Stokes et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5830298 | Jackson | Nov 1998 | A |
5843057 | McCormack | Dec 1998 | A |
5858515 | Stokes et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5866222 | Seth et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5888607 | Seth et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891547 | Lawless | Apr 1999 | A |
5904793 | Gorman et al. | May 1999 | A |
5931823 | Stokes et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945215 | Bersted et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5953797 | Provost et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5962102 | Sheffield et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5962112 | Haynes et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5964742 | McCormack et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5997981 | McCormack et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6051094 | Melbye et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6086984 | DiMaggio, Jr. et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6087279 | Laun | Jul 2000 | A |
6093665 | Sayovitz et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6129879 | Bersted et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6129964 | Seth | Oct 2000 | A |
6158097 | Dilo | Dec 2000 | A |
6161269 | Dilo et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162522 | Deka et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6192556 | Kikko et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195850 | Melbye et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6248276 | Parellada et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6265053 | Kronzer et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280670 | Buzzell et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6329016 | Shepard et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6342285 | Shepard et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6355759 | Sherman et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368444 | Jameson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6410138 | Mleziva et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6454989 | Neely et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6489004 | Martin et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6537935 | Seth et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6558602 | Melbye et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6598276 | Shepard et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6638611 | Seth | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6642160 | Takahashi | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6642429 | Carter et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6645611 | Seth | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6660202 | Shepard et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6686303 | Haynes et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6703086 | Kronzer et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709996 | Mleziva et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716511 | Bersted et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6740385 | Gardner et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6756327 | Martin | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6783834 | Shepard et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6849142 | Goulait | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6869659 | Shepard et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6893525 | Schmidt et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6948221 | Fuchs | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6955847 | Itou et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6991843 | Armela et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7052638 | Clarner et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7117571 | Dilo | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7156937 | Provost et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7275290 | Clarner et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7276642 | Belau | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7282251 | Provost et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7465366 | Provost et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7547469 | Provost et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7562426 | Barker et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
20010051253 | Tai et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20030077430 | Grimm et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030101549 | Wang et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030119404 | Belau et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040020579 | Durrance et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040022993 | Wildeman | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040072491 | Gillette et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040131820 | Turner | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040157036 | Provost et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040163221 | Shepard et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040229008 | Hoying | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050196580 | Provost et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050196581 | Provost et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050196583 | Provost et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050208259 | Provost et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050217092 | Barker et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050281976 | Curro et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060105664 | Zafiroglu | May 2006 | A1 |
20060183389 | Zafiroglu | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060225258 | Barker et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070178273 | Provost et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080113152 | Provost et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080305291 | Nakaoka et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080305297 | Barker et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080305704 | Provost et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090203280 | Provost et al. | Aug 2009 | A9 |
20090208699 | Miyauchi et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101 39 842 | Apr 2003 | DE |
0 341 993 | Nov 1989 | EP |
0 211 564 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0 482 749 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0 325 473 | Mar 1993 | EP |
0 604 731 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0 619 085 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0 765 616 | Apr 1997 | EP |
0 780 066 | Jun 1997 | EP |
0 780 505 | Jun 1997 | EP |
0 598 085 | Jul 1997 | EP |
0 597 075 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0 882 828 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0 937 420 | Aug 1999 | EP |
0 726 977 | Jun 2000 | EP |
0 862 868 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1 132 511 | Sep 2001 | EP |
0 861 137 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1 279 348 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 156 767 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1 113 099 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1 689 259 | Dec 2008 | EP |
1 228 421 | Apr 1971 | GB |
1228431 | Apr 1971 | GB |
2 068 023 | Aug 1981 | GB |
2 285 093 | Jun 1995 | GB |
6-33359 | Feb 1994 | JP |
06-123061 | May 1994 | JP |
7-171011 | Jul 1995 | JP |
08-27657 | Jan 1996 | JP |
09 003755 | Jan 1997 | JP |
09-195154 | Jul 1997 | JP |
09-195155 | Jul 1997 | JP |
09-241961 | Sep 1997 | JP |
10-146207 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10-151005 | Jun 1998 | JP |
2971332 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000-314065 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-212 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-8713 | Jan 2001 | JP |
3134709 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-207369 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001-514346 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002-10807 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2003-265207 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004-194730 | Jul 2004 | JP |
3855084 | Dec 2006 | JP |
3877842 | Feb 2007 | JP |
WO9201401 | Feb 1992 | WO |
WO9517111 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO 9520335 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO9833410 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9911452 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO0040793 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO0042964 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO0180680 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO02100207 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO03051251 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO2004019305 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO2004049853 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO2004058118 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO2004058497 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO2004059061 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO2004059117 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO2005037006 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2006110575 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO2006110598 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO-2010030548 | Mar 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/042907 mailed Nov. 2, 2012 (18 pp). |
Dilo Group, “Market Leadership in Nonwovens Technology”, Pakistan Textile Journal, date unknown (2 pages). |
Dilo, “Engineering Excellence in Needle Looms!”, Hyperpunch—The Solution for Fine and Quality Fleeces, Synthetic Leather, Spunbondeds, Papermachine Felts!, date unknown (2 pages). |
Purdy, Terry, Dilo Inc., Needle Punching Benefits from Elliptical Needle Paths, date unknown (13 pages). |
Website: http://www.inda.org/pubs/c-papers/np00-toc.html. Inda.org, Needlepunch 2000 conference paper listing, retrieved Sep. 24, 2007. 2 Pages. |
Narejo, D., et al, “Advances in Needlepunching”, GFR, Jun./Jul. 2002, pp. 18-21. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion; Application No. PCT/US2012/042901; mailed Dec. 21, 2012; 12 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130052403 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61527361 | Aug 2011 | US |