The present invention relates generally to looped-cord mechanisms of the type commonly used in window coverings and treatments, such as blinds, curtains, and the like. More particularly, the present invention relates to a looped-cord mechanism that can be attached to a shaft in the headrail which does not operate the window covering unless the cord tensioner has been properly mounted to a wall or other non-moveable structure.
Many types of architectural coverings and treatments, such as Venetian blinds, cellular or pleated shades, and variants of these utilize an actuator known as a looped-cord or continuous looped-cord. Such cords are distinct from the basic pull cord style shades in that the looped-cord does not connect directly to the shade material, but rather engages a clutch on a rotating shaft in a headrail of the shade. Movement of the looped-cord in a first direction operates that clutch to accumulate shade material when opening, and movement of the looped-cord in a second direction lets out shade material. The looped-cord may be made at different lengths than the shade and may be configured to make multiple circulations during opening and closing of the shade. Often a beaded cord is used in a looped-cord drive. The benefits of a looped-cord system versus a standard pull cord system are that the exposed cord loop remains at a constant length whether the shade is open or closed (avoiding the problem of stowing the long exposed pull cord when the shade is opened). Moreover, a looped-cord system also provides a mechanical advantage to raise relatively large, heavy shades with reasonable cord forces.
However, looped-cord systems also have a significant disadvantage. The cord loop may hang freely along a side of the shade which is operated by the looped-cord system. Many looped-cord systems have been installed such that the cord loop extends to or below the bottom of the window and the cord is easily grasped by young children. A dangling cord loop has proved to be a health hazard to young children. In recent years, cases of death or injury have been documented in which a small child has become entangled in a cord loop and has choked or become asphyxiated when the cord became wrapped around the child's neck and constricted the child's airway. All of these incidents involved looped-cord systems which did not have a cord tensioner or the cord tensioner was not attached to the wall and the cord loop hung freely.
Current safety regulations in the United States require that looped-cord style shades be supplied with a tensioner. A tensioner typically includes a two-piece housing with a through passage for a cord and is configured for attachment to a wall or other fixed structure. A properly installed tensioner pulls the cord loop downward away from the headrail so that the cord is taut when used to raise and lower a blind and when not in use. When the cord is taut it should be difficult to spread the two runs of the cord loop apart a sufficient distance for a child's head to fit within the loop, thereby preventing injury and possibly death. However, some tensioners have been installed with a dangerous amount of slack in the cord loop and some tensioners have not been installed at all.
To minimize the limitations of known tensioners, improved tensioner designs have been developed. One design includes a tensioning spring between a cord contacting member and a tensioner mounting body. This improved design allows the tensioner to be mounted with the cord loop fully taut and the tensioning spring partially loaded. The pre-loaded spring holds the cord loop taut while not in operation, thus preventing a young child from spreading the cord loop wide enough to pass his or her head through the loop. During operation of the looped-cord system, an adult operating the cord will be able to overcome the remainder of the spring loading and easily pull the cord to open or close the shade. However, even this improved tensioner design has not fully addressed the safety concerns associated with the looped-cord systems because there is no requirement that the tensioner be installed for the shade to be operable. The end user may elect not to mount the tensioner to the wall or other non-moveable structure and instead use the tensioner as a weight at the bottom of the cord loop. Although new tensioner designs include safety improvements, if the tensioner is not mounted to the wall, as discussed above, it will not prevent the opening of the cord loop to a dangerous width.
Therefore, a need exists for a looped-cord system which will prevent the window covering from being raised and lowered if the tensioner has not been properly installed.
A looped-cord system has a housing, a sprocket attached to the housing and a beaded cord loop hung from the sprocket. The beaded cord has a set of beads connected in series to form a loop with a space between each pair of adjacent beads. In a present preferred embodiment of my looped-cord system a stop is attached to the housing. The stop is sized to fit within the space between a pair of adjacent beads. A resilient finger is located opposite the stop and pushes a portion of the beaded cord adjacent to and not engaging the sprocket against the stop such that the stop is within a space between a pair of adjacent beads, thereby preventing movement of the beaded cord loop. Applying tension to the cord loop will overcome the pushing of the resilient finger and move the beaded cord away from the stop enabling movement of the beaded cord loop.
A second present preferred embodiment is similar to the first embodiment and includes a second resilient finger and stop.
In a third present preferred embodiment a moveable key is provided which is movable from a first position in which the key is within a space between a pair of adjacent beads to a second position in which the key is spaced away from the beaded cord. A spring or other bias member acts on the key to move the key into a space between a pair of adjacent beads in the cord loop preventing the beaded cord loop from moving around the sprocket. The key may be on the end of a resilient finger. The resilient finger causes the beaded cord loop to be pressed against a wall or stop such that the beaded cord loop does not hang freely and will not move. A downward force acting on the cord loop when a tensioner is properly installed will pull the beaded cord away from the wall or stop enabling the cord to move so that the beaded cord loop may move around the sprocket.
In a fourth embodiment the key engages the sprocket, rather than the beaded chain, preventing the sprocket from turning. When the key is so positioned the beaded cord loop does not hang freely, but us pressed inward or outward by an arm connected to the key. A downward force acting on the cord loop when a tensioner is properly installed will pull the corded bead loop such that an arm or arms connected to the key will move disengaging the key from the sprocket enabling the beaded cord to move around the sprocket.
Other variations and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from a description of certain present preferred embodiment thereof shown in the drawings.
Referring to
A major disadvantage of the looped-cord drive systems in the prior art is that the window covering can be raised and lowered when the tensioner is not attached to the wall.
I provide a looped-cord system which will not allow the window covering material to be raised and lowered if the tensioner is not properly installed and can be used in place of any current looped-cord system known in the art.
In a first present preferred embodiment of my looped-cord system I provide a drive unit 20 shown in
As shown in
A second present preferred embodiment of a looped-cord drive for my of my looped-cord system is shown in
Another present preferred embodiment of a looped-cord drive 40 for my of my looped-cord system is shown in
While I have shown certain present preferred embodiments of my looped-cord system and drive units which can be used in that system it should be distinctly understood that the invention is not limited thereto but may be variously embodiment within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1128204 | Wharton | Feb 1915 | A |
2109112 | Hanson | Feb 1938 | A |
2577046 | Svirsky | Dec 1951 | A |
3253645 | Stall | May 1966 | A |
3462095 | Hilsinger, Jr. et al. | Aug 1969 | A |
5279473 | Rozon | Jan 1994 | A |
5354011 | Rozon | Oct 1994 | A |
5762281 | Foley | Jun 1998 | A |
5791580 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6745969 | Gouda | Jun 2004 | B1 |
8695680 | Cannaverde | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20080251622 | Randall et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100258664 | Twork | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130079186 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |