1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a nut which is less prone to loosening even if vibrations are applied.
2. Description of the Related Art
Conventionally, nuts threadedly engaging with bolts have been used in large quantities together with bolts in all types of structures including motor vehicles, machines, and electrical equipment. The nut achieves excellent operation and effects as a fastener because it is firmly fitted by strong tightening, but it has a drawback in that when being used at a place where vibrations are applied, it is loosened by the vibrations.
To overcome this drawback, a method has been used in which two nuts are used in lapped manner as what is called a double nut. The double nut achieves an effect of being less prone to loosening as compared with the case where one nut is used as before (single nut) even if it is used at a place where vibrations are applied.
However, since the double nut uses two nuts, it is higher in cost than the single nut, and requires time and labor two times those for the single nut in installation.
The present invention has been made to solve the above problems, and accordingly an object thereof is to provide a looseness preventive nut which does not loosen even if vibrations are applied, and can be used as a single nut.
A first invention provides a looseness preventive nut 1 which is a nut threadedly engaging with a bolt 10, the nut being configured so that a lateral groove 3 extending in the radial direction in the range such that at least a part of a threaded portion 2 is cut, preferably in the range beyond the centerline C of the nut, is formed at a position slightly lower than a substantially middle point of the nut in the height direction.
A second invention provides a looseness preventive nut 1 which is a nut threadedly engaging with a bolt 10, the nut being configured so that a lateral groove 3 extending in the radial direction in the range such that at least a part of a threaded portion 2 is cut, preferably in the range beyond the centerline C of the nut, is formed at a position slightly lower than a substantially middle point of the nut in the height direction; the bearing surface of the nut is an inclined bearing surface 4 having an inclination angle θ of about 1° to 10°; and the extension of a neutral line P—P of the lateral groove 3 and the extension of a neutral line Q—Q of the inclined bearing surface 4 intersect each other.
The above-described looseness preventive nuts 1 in accordance with the first and second embodiments are less prone to loosening even if vibrations are applied because they are formed with the lateral groove 3 and the inclined bearing surface 4.
The reason for this is thought to be that by forming the lateral groove 3, vibrations transmitted from the bolt 10, an object to be fastened, etc. are absorbed by the lateral groove 3, and the vibrations are prevented from being transmitted as they are to the whole of the nut 1. Also, the reason is thought to be that since the lateral groove 3 is formed in the range beyond the centerline C of the nut 1, a threaded portion 2 is partially cut, and thereby the transmission of vibrations is isolated by this cut portion.
Also, the reason is thought to be that the formation of the inclined bearing surface 4 also restrains the transmission of vibrations from the object to be fastened to the nut 1. Further, the reason is thought to be that the close contact of the nut 1 with the object to be fastened is achieved locally by the inclined bearing surface 4.
Although the lateral groove 3 is formed in the range beyond the centerline C of the nut 1 in the above-described embodiments, the present invention is not limited to this configuration. Even if the lateral groove is formed in the range such that a part of the threaded portion 2 is cut, the operation and effects can be achieved to some extent. Also, the lateral groove 3 can be formed in a slantwise direction, not in the horizontal direction. Further, although the inclination angle θ of the inclined bearing surface 4 is preferably 1° to 2° the inclination angle θ is not limited to this range of angle, and may be in the range of approximately less than 1° to 5°.
For an experiment, a nut with a thread diameter of 16 mm, a pitch of 2 mm, an opposite angle distance of 26.75 mm, an opposite side distance of 24 mm, and a height of 16.4 mm was used, and a lateral groove 3 with a width of 1 mm and a horizontal depth of 17 mm was formed at a position 6.5 mm distant from the bottom surface of the nut.
An experiment was conducted to compare the performance of the looseness preventive nut 1 in accordance with the present invention with that of the conventional single nut and double nut.
This experiment was conducted for 17 minutes (1020 seconds) using a high-speed screw looseness testing machine 30.
The results of this experiment are given in Table 1. In Table 1, No. 10 is the looseness preventive nut 1 in accordance with the first embodiment of the present invention, and No. 11 is the nut of the first embodiment in which the inclination angle θ of the inclined bearing surface 4 is changed from 1° to 2°. Also, No. 12 is the looseness preventive nut 1 in accordance with the second embodiment of the present invention, and No. 13 is the nut of the second embodiment in which the inclination angle θ of the inclined bearing surface 4 is changed from 1° to 2°.
From these experimental results, it is found that the looseness preventive nut 1 in accordance with the present invention has a higher looseness preventing function than the single nut of the related art, and also has a looseness preventive mechanism as high as that of the conventional double nut.
Specifically, the conventional single nut indicated as No. 9 was tightened with a torque of 194 N.m as in the case of the first embodiment of the present invention, and looseness occurred after 325 seconds had elapsed. In contrast, for the looseness preventive nut 1 in accordance with the present invention, looseness did not occur for 17 minutes.
Also, for example, for the conventional double nut indicated as No. 7, a tightening nut 20 was tightened with a torque higher than that of the looseness preventive nut 1 in accordance with the second embodiment of the present invention (the related art: 188 N.m, the present invention: 180 N.m), and additionally a locknut 21 was used. However, the effect of preventing looseness was the same. Therefore, it is found that the looseness preventive nut 1 in accordance with the present invention performs almost the same looseness preventive function as that of the conventional double nut though being of a simple configuration.
The looseness preventive nut 1 in accordance with the present invention is not limited to a hexagon nut, and includes various types of nuts such as a butterfly nut, castle nut, shank nut, cap nut, round nut, and spring nut.
Both of the looseness preventive nuts 1 in accordance with the first and second inventions are less prone to loosening even if vibrations are applied because the lateral groove 3 and the inclined bearing surface 4 are formed. Also, since they can be used as a single nut, they are lower in cost and the installation work thereof is easier than the double nut.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10-2004-0036435 | May 2004 | KR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
168830 | Chapman | Oct 1875 | A |
171898 | Wiles | Jan 1876 | A |
188055 | Johnson | Mar 1877 | A |
378779 | Edgar | Feb 1888 | A |
394948 | Allen et al. | Dec 1888 | A |
465094 | Fougere | Dec 1891 | A |
483676 | Neil | Oct 1892 | A |
529034 | Leidgen | Nov 1894 | A |
609144 | Goddin | Aug 1898 | A |
678629 | Smith | Jul 1901 | A |
815541 | Leatherman | Mar 1906 | A |
838948 | Bryar | Dec 1906 | A |
992137 | Nowak | May 1911 | A |
995136 | Harrris | Jun 1911 | A |
1019379 | Taft | Mar 1912 | A |
1039916 | Farrell | Oct 1912 | A |
1075617 | Whitehead | Oct 1913 | A |
1087056 | Ward | Feb 1914 | A |
1113419 | Dollman | Oct 1914 | A |
1120954 | Maher | Dec 1914 | A |
RE13867 | Taft | Jan 1915 | E |
1263217 | Fine | Apr 1918 | A |
1291114 | Pickin | Jan 1919 | A |
1299702 | Glass | Apr 1919 | A |
1340496 | Patterson | May 1920 | A |
1347124 | Schrader | Jul 1920 | A |
1447578 | Thomas | Mar 1923 | A |
1760113 | Brown | May 1930 | A |
1833563 | Easter | Nov 1931 | A |
1852203 | Easter | Apr 1932 | A |
1861833 | Bergstrom | Jun 1932 | A |
2007171 | Bergstrom | Jul 1935 | A |
2007293 | Cayouette | Jul 1935 | A |
2035859 | Bergstrom | Mar 1936 | A |
RE20915 | Bergstrom | Nov 1938 | E |
2142819 | Olson | Jan 1939 | A |
2142820 | Olson | Jan 1939 | A |
2213353 | Whitcombe | Sep 1940 | A |
2221961 | Allen et al. | Nov 1940 | A |
2231130 | Lehre | Feb 1941 | A |
2235405 | Markey | Mar 1941 | A |
2243515 | Van Sant | May 1941 | A |
2282641 | Corey | May 1942 | A |
2304310 | Luce | Dec 1942 | A |
2367259 | Beach | Jan 1945 | A |
2391712 | King et al. | Dec 1945 | A |
2391902 | Hosking | Jan 1946 | A |
2422833 | King et al. | Jun 1947 | A |
2472421 | Hamil et al. | Jun 1949 | A |
2487219 | Butler | Nov 1949 | A |
3087525 | Nyswaner et al. | Apr 1963 | A |
3262481 | Hanfland | Jul 1966 | A |
3265109 | Hanfland | Aug 1966 | A |
3385339 | Dahl | May 1968 | A |
3501995 | Lanius, Jr. | Mar 1970 | A |
5662443 | Dziaba | Sep 1997 | A |
5662445 | Harbottle et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
6146074 | Tutikawa | Nov 2000 | A |
6168361 | Adler | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6851905 | Manfred | Feb 2005 | B2 |
20010018014 | Ito | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20040028501 | Haraldsson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050260057 A1 | Nov 2005 | US |