The present disclosure relates generally to systems for actuating valves and relates generally to lost motion rocker brakes for internal combustion engines. The present disclosure also relates to systems and components for controlling rocker arm motion and to stroke-limiting and biasing of lost motion rocker brake valvetrain components.
Internal combustion engines require valve actuation systems to control the flow of combustible components, typically fuel and air, to one or more combustion chambers during operation. Such systems control the motion and timing of intake and exhaust valves during engine operation. In a positive power mode, intake valves are opened to admit fuel and air into a cylinder for combustion and exhaust valves are subsequently opened to allow combustion products to escape the cylinder. This operation is typically called a “positive power” operation of the engine and the motions applied to the valves during positive power operation are typically called “main event” valve actuation motions. Auxiliary valve actuation motion, such as motion that results in engine braking (power absorbing), may be accomplished using “auxiliary” events imparted to one or more of the engine valves.
Valve movement during main event positive power modes of operation is typically controlled by one or more rotating cams as motion sources. Cam followers, push rods, rocker arms and other elements disposed in a valvetrain provide for direct transfer of motion from the cam surface to the valves. The use of a valve bridge may impart motion to plural valves from a single upstream valvetrain. For auxiliary events, “lost motion” devices may be utilized in the valvetrain to facilitate auxiliary event valve movement. Lost motion devices refer to a class of technical solutions in which valve motion is modified compared to the motion that would otherwise occur because of actuation by a respective cam surface alone. Lost motion devices may include devices whose length, rigidity or compressibility is varied and controlled to facilitate the selective occurrence of auxiliary events in addition to, or as an alternative to, main event operation of valves. Auxiliary events may also be facilitated by dedicated cam systems in which a separate auxiliary or braking cam and valvetrain may be used to impart auxiliary motion to one or more valves to facilitate the selective occurrence of auxiliary events.
In braking, and other auxiliary lost motion applications, multiple valve events may be incorporated into the same cam lobe and different events activated or deactivated, based on the selective extension or retraction of a lost motion element, such as an actuator piston. Lost motion cam systems typically use at least one cam with different profiled lift sections on the same cam lobe to impart motion for respective main event and one or more auxiliary events. These different profiled lift sections are activated or deactivated using a separate lost motion mechanism, such as a piston or actuator, located in the valvetrain. Example auxiliary events include engine braking, early exhaust valve opening (EEVO), late intake valve closing (LIVC) lift events, and internal exhaust gas recirculation events (IEGR) and can be imparted to one or more valves in a valve set (i.e., two exhaust valves for a respective cylinder). Lost motion auxiliary valve lift systems, such as lost motion braking systems, may employ a single rocker associated with the lost motion cam and a valve bridge associated with the rocker for actuating two engine valves in main event motion. Auxiliary valve lift or braking motion on one of the valves is facilitated by an auxiliary valve lift or braking actuator, which is a lost motion device that may be housed in the rocker and may selectively impart auxiliary or braking motion to the valve by way of a bridge pin disposed in the bridge. The bridge pin provides independent motion of one of the two engine valves relative to another one of the two engine valves. The auxiliary valve lift or braking actuator may be selectively activated such that the auxiliary or braking event lift profile section or lobe on the lost motion cam causes movement of the bridge pin and auxiliary or braking motion of the one engine valve when desired.
Some lost motion valve actuation systems may utilize sub-base circle lost motion profiles on one or more cams. In such systems, a main event valve lift profile may be provided on the cam above the cam base circle, whereas lost motion profiles are provided on the same cam below the cam base circle. During main event motion, with the lost motion actuator deactivated, a lost motion gap is produced in the valvetrain, and the sub-base circle profiles are, as a result, lost and not passed on to the engine valve(s). When the lost motion actuator is activated, the lost motion gap in the valvetrain is taken up, and the auxiliary motion profile(s) may be conveyed to the engine valve(s).
Existing solutions for rocker control in such lost motion environments have utilized biasing mechanisms, which may bias a cam side of the rocker towards the cam so that the rocker cam follower is in constant contact with the cam, even during events that would otherwise cause gaps in the valvetrain, thus preventing uncontrolled motion of the rocker during these events. Biasing mechanisms that achieve these results may include spring bars, actuator piston springs or an undermounted rocker bias spring.
Cam side rocker biasing solutions in the prior art are not without disadvantages. For example, in such solutions, particularly when sub-base circle auxiliary events are utilized, strong biasing forces, on the order of several hundred Newtons of force, and appropriately designed biasing components may be required to maintain contact between the cam roller (follower) and cam lobe in the brake off condition—when the auxiliary motion lift actuator is in a deactivated state. Such biasing forces are required because, with the auxiliary motion lift actuator deactivated, the full mass of the rocker arm is typically exposed to the acceleration and deceleration forces generated by the cam and, as a result, the rocker arm and cam follower may otherwise tend to separate from the cam surface.
Lost motion rocker brakes are generally known in the art of valvetrain and valve actuation system design for internal combustion engines. Lost motion systems allow profiles for multiple valve events to be incorporated into the same exhaust cam lobe and the different events activated or deactivated based on selective extension or retraction of a lost motion element, such as a lost motion actuator piston.
One concern with lost motion rocker brakes is that when the brake is in the deactivated or “off” state, there may be a large gap created by the retraction of the lost motion element. More specifically, a gap may be created between the lost motion element and other valvetrain components, such as a motion source or cam. This gap may leave the rocker brake unloaded or unconstrained and may therefore allow uncontrolled motion of the rocker brake. Past solutions intended to address this concern have utilized biasing mechanisms that bias the lost motion rocker brake towards the valves to keep the rocker brake in constant contact with the valve bridge and avoid uncontrolled motion in the valvetrain.
The instant disclosure will describe details of additional embodiments for biasing and stroke limiting that are particularly adaptable to lost motion rocker brake systems. The embodiments of the instant disclosure are particularly adaptable to e-foot, push rod and other valvetrain components and environments.
Responsive to the foregoing challenges, and according to one aspect, the instant disclosure provides various embodiments of valve actuation systems with features for controlling rocker motion, which features may be applied in lost-motion systems. More particularly, the disclosure describes systems in which a biasing component is arranged and adapted to bias a cam side of the rocker in a direction that is towards the cam. Additional aspects may provide biasing components on an e-foot that cooperates with a valve bridge to eliminate gaps and further enhance control of the rocker and valve bridge. The e-foot may further be provided with a defined stroke to facilitate the formation of a gap between valvetrain components to permit a layer of oil to form during the valve cycle. The e-foot may further be provided with a retaining feature to maintain the e-foot in an assembled state even when the e-foot is not in contact with another valvetrain component (i.e., a valve bridge). The described systems facilitate rocker control even during deactivation of a lost motion component, improved lubrication, and ease of assembly.
According to an aspect, the disclosure provides system for actuating at least one of two or more engine valves in an internal combustion engine, the system comprising: a motion source defining a main event motion profile and an auxiliary motion profile; a valvetrain for conveying motion from the motion source to the at least one engine valve, the valvetrain having at least two valvetrain components; a biasing component arranged to apply a biasing force to maintain at least one of the valvetrain components in a controlled state; and a stroke limited component cooperating with the biasing component and adapted to create a lash gap between the at least two valvetrain components. According to a further aspect, the system may comprise a lost motion component cooperating with the valvetrain, the lost motion component being configurable to a first mode, in which the lost motion component absorbs the auxiliary motion, and a second mode, in which the lost motion component conveys the auxiliary motion.
According to a further aspect, the biasing component may be a spring arranged as part of an e-foot assembly. In a further aspect, the e-foot assembly may include an extendable portion and the spring may be arranged to bias the extendable portion towards an extended position. In a further aspect, the e-foot assembly may include a telescoping portion.
According to a further aspect, the stroke limited component may be an e-foot assembly. The e-foot assembly may include an extendable portion. The extendable portion may include a stop for limiting the extension of the extendable portion.
According to a further aspect, the biasing component may be a spring arranged as part of a push rod assembly. In a further aspect, the push rod assembly may include an extendable portion. In a further aspect, the spring may be arranged to bias the extendable portion towards an extended position. In a further aspect, the push rod assembly may include a telescoping portion.
According to a further aspect, the stroke limited component may be a pushrod assembly. In a further aspect, the pushrod assembly may include an extendable portion and the extendable portion may include a stop for limiting extension of the extendable portion. According to a further aspect, the biasing component may be arranged to bias a motion source (cam) side of the rocker towards a motion source (cam).
According to a further aspect, the system further comprises an e-foot biasing component for maintaining the e-foot in contact with other valvetrain components.
According to a further aspect, the e-foot is configured to be extendable in length to define a stroke. According to a further aspect, the biasing component or stroke limited component may comprise an e-foot assembly comprising a screw boss, a swivel boss, a pin, a cap and a bias spring. According to a further aspect the biasing component or stroke limited component may comprise a pushrod assembly comprising a screw boss, a swivel boss, a push rod boss, a pin and a bias spring. In another aspect, the stroke limited component may comprise a pushrod adjustment screw. In a further aspect, the stroke limited component may comprise a pin, a lip, a c-clip or a step for limiting extension of an extendable portion. According to a further aspect, the biasing component may be arranged to control inertial forces of the rocker arm to prevent a no follow condition between a sub-base and base circle of a cam. According to a further aspect, the biasing component may be adapted to provide a zero bias load gap between a rocker and a valve bridge at sub-base circle of a cam.
According to a further aspect, the valvetrain may be a Type 3 overhead cam valvetrain or a Type 4 valvetrain or a Type 5 valvetrain.
Other aspects and advantages of the disclosure will be apparent to those of ordinary skill from the detailed description that follows, and the above aspects should not be viewed as exhaustive or limiting. The foregoing general description and the following detailed description are intended to provide examples of the inventive aspects of this disclosure and should in no way be construed as limiting or restrictive of the scope defined in the appended claims.
The above features and attendant advantages, and others thereof will become apparent from consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. One or more embodiments are now described, by way of illustrative example only, and not intended to be limiting to the scope of invention set forth in the claims appended hereto, with reference to the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals represent like elements and in which:
Referring particularly to
Still referring to
Valve side 110 of the rocker 100 may include an e-foot assembly 600 and a valve bridge 310. The e-foot assembly may constitute a portion of a main event load path for conveying main event motion from the rocker 100 to a valve bridge 310, and ultimately to two engine valves (see
As best seen in
As will be recognized from the disclosure, when the lost motion component 200 is activated, sub-base circle auxiliary motion profiles of a motion source may be conveyed to one of the engine valves. As shown in
Referring additionally to
According to aspects of the disclosure, a stroke limited component may also be integrated into the e-foot assembly 600. The projection 652 of lower part 650 may be provided with an axially extending slot or channel 654. The upper part 620 may be provided with a transverse bore 658, which receives a retaining pin 670. Retaining pin 670 extends through both the transverse bore 658 and the slot 654 in lower part 650, thus retaining the lower part 650 within the upper part 620 and limiting the movement of lower part 650 relative to upper part 620. A stroke length “S” may be defined by the range of movement of lower part 650 relative to upper part 620, which may in turn be defined by the contact of different parts. For example, an upper extent of travel of lower part 650 within upper part 620 may be defined by the dimensions of the lower annular skirt 630 of upper part 620, which may impact the shoulder 656 to define an upper travel limit of lower part 650 within upper part 620.
Thus, in this and other embodiments, and consistent with aspects of the disclosure, the stroke limited e-foot may be configured to provide for a small gap between the e-foot and valve bridge when the rocker encounters a sub-base circle portion of the cam. This configuration permits unloading of the e-foot and allows for the formation or reformation of a lubrication layer within the e-foot assembly, such as between the e-foot cap and bushing, and at other locations (valvetrain component interfaces) in the valvetrain. This configuration may also provide for reduction or negation of any valve spring pre-load. The e-foot assembly may also be configured such that the mechanism bottoms out after stroking between sub-base and base circle of the cam.
As will be recognized from the instant disclosure, lost motion rocker brake systems, such as those described above, bias the rocker brake towards the cam of the engine and away from the valves. This has several benefits, including a reduction in the components needed to assemble the rocker brake into the valvetrain. Additionally, the stroke limited e-foot reduces valve bridge and e-foot cap wear due to the lost motion gap where extra oil can penetrate. Furthermore, the stroke limited feature reduces bushing wear which occurs from loading the bushing area during 100% of the rocker's duty cycle.
The following operational description will serve to further illustrate aspects of the disclosure and interaction of the described components. In a “brake off” mode, when the cam follower encounters a sub-base circle portion of the cam and the actuator piston is retracted, the e-foot assembly may be in an extended position to maintain engagement with the valve bridge. When the system is still in a brake off mode, but when the cam follower encounters a base circle portion of the cam (with the actuator piston still retracted), the e-foot assembly may undergo partial compression from its extended position, with compression of the e-foot assembly spring and the e-foot still maintaining contact with the valve bridge and biasing of the rocker cam side toward the cam.
In a “brake on” mode, with the actuator piston extended (but possibly not touching the bridge pin), and the cam follower encountering a sub-base circle portion of the cam, the e-foot assembly may be in an extended position to maintain contact between the e-foot and the valve bridge. Still in a “brake on” mode, with the actuator piston extended, the valve bridge may undergo a slight tilt due to contact with the bridge pin. The e-foot assembly may be in a compressed state to maintain contact of the e-foot with the valve bridge.
According to aspects of the disclosure, biasing and stroke limiting features may be integrated into valvetrain components other than an e-foot assembly, as described above. For example, biasing and stroke limiting features may be integrated into components of a push rod configuration as shown in the two embodiments in
A biasing component may be implemented in the embodiment of
It will be recognized that the stroke-limiting and biasing configurations of the push rod embodiments of
As will be recognized from the instant disclosure, lost motion rocker brake systems, such as those described above, bias the rocker brake towards the valve-side of the engine and away from the cam. This has several benefits, including a significant reduction in the biasing force needed to control the rocker brake in a brake off condition. The valvetrain becomes easier to design with less biasing force required on the push rod side. With a lighter biasing force, the overall system can be lighter with potential lower costs as well.
The stroke limiting features described above also provide advantages. The stroke limiting functionality provides for a predefined stroke in the valvetrain which, in combination with the biasing component, may facilitate the adjustment of e-foot or push rod position for all operating conditions, including brake “off” (or lost motion deactivated) states of operation. This in turn may allow for a desirable gap formation between the e-foot and valve bridge or between other valvetrain components. In addition, the stroke limiting features may function as retaining features that allow a preassembled e-foot or push rod system to be assembled and shipped as an assembled component that may be easily installed in a larger engine environment without separate installation or assembly steps in the field.
While particular embodiments have been shown and described, those skilled in the art will appreciate that changes and modifications may be made without departing from the instant teachings. It is therefore contemplated that all modifications, variations, or equivalents of the above-described teachings fall within the scope of the basic underlying principles disclosed above.
For example, while the above examples have been described in the context of a Type 3 valvetrain (center pivot) rocker or a Type 5 valvetrain (pushrod), it will be recognized that the described biasing components and stroke limited components may be implemented in other valvetrain types, such as Type 2 (end pivot rocker) or Type 4 (center pivot rocker with follower).
Further, while the disclosed biasing components and stroke limited components are explained using the illustrative embodiments of an e-foot and pushrod, it will be recognized that the described biasing components and stroke limited components may be implemented as part of other valvetrain components, such as cam followers, for example.
Still further, while the disclosed embodiments may feature a lost motion component as part of the valvetrain, it will be recognized that the biasing and stroke limiting features of the disclosed embodiments may be utilized in valvetrain systems that do not incorporate lost motion components.
This application claims priority to U.S. provisional application No. 63/266,505, filed Jan. 6, 2022, and titled LOST MOTION ROCKER BRAKE BIASING AND STROKE LIMITING SYSTEMS. This application also claims priority to international application PCT/IB2021/053904 (WO2022106907), filed May 7, 2021, and titled ROCKER CONTROL IN LOST MOTION ENGINE VALVE ACTUATION SYSTEMS, which claims priority to U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 63/198,902, filed Nov. 20, 2020, and titled LOST MOTION ROCKER BRAKE BIASING SYSTEM. The subject matter and specifications of the above listed applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63266505 | Jan 2022 | US | |
63198902 | Nov 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/IB21/53904 | May 2021 | US |
Child | 18150622 | US |