This Application is a Section 371 National Stage Application of International Application No. PCT/EP2008/002396, filed Jul. 14, 2008 and published as WO 2009/013460 A2 on Jan. 29, 2009, the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The present invention relates generally to a loudspeaker and an acoustic radiator assembly for a loudspeaker.
In acoustics, loudspeaker designers are always striving to produce loudspeakers with an acoustic radiation pattern with as much directional uniformity and as smooth a pressure response as possible.
WO 2006/092609 discloses how a dome-shaped diaphragm generating a spherical wavefront and a conical wave guide of limited angle can be arranged to produce a loudspeaker having conical dispersion characteristics with an exceptionally smooth pressure response.
There are occasions when it is desirable for a loudspeaker to produce a non axi-symmetric acoustic radiation pattern. For example, in an auditorium it may be desirable for the acoustic wavefronts to have different curvatures in the horizontal and vertical directions. In the prior art one technique for achieving this is to use horns which, by means of diffraction slots, forcibly shape the wavefronts to achieve the desired acoustic radiation pattern.
The present invention is based on the inventors' realisation that loudspeaker designers, in trying to achieve an acoustic radiation pattern with as much directional uniformity and as smooth a pressure response as possible, ought to be seeking to replicate, in practice, as closely as possible one of an idealised plane, cylindrical or spherical sound source. These theoretical sound sources give rise, according to the Helmholtz wave equation, to very simple travelling waves which can be described as a function of a single spatial parameter and thus have no directional irregularities.
With this realisation in mind, the present invention stemmed from the recognition that a ring of point sources circumscribing an infinitely long rigid cylinder could be expected to give rise to wavefronts which are toroidal in shape, and, accordingly, have different curvatures in different directions. Finite element models have shown such boundary conditions do indeed result in an approximately toroidal wavefront with little amplitude variation across the wavefront. In an appropriate coordinate system the wave may be approximately described as a function of a single spatial parameter.
Accordingly, according to a first aspect of the invention, the present invention may provide a loudspeaker comprising a horn waveguide having a throat and a waveguide surface; an acoustic radiator assembly, located at the throat of the waveguide, comprising a diaphragm having a rigid acoustically radiating surface shaped as a section from a toroidal surface for generating acoustic wavefronts, the waveguide surface being adapted to match the shape of the wavefronts coming from the assembly.
Thus, the present invention by using an acoustic radiator assembly with a diaphragm having an acoustically radiating surface shaped as a section from a toroidal surface is able to directly generate a radiation pattern having wavefronts with different curvatures in two orthogonal (e.g. x and y) directions and have good directional regularity.
A torus is a surface of revolution generated by revolving a circle in three dimensions about an axis of rotation coplanar with the circle. Thus, a surface of a section cut from the torus may be thought of as having two defining curvatures, a first curvature in a plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the torus, and a second curvature in a second plane co-planar with the axis of rotation. Also, the extent of the surface of the section cut from the torus may be thought of as having two defining angles, a first section angle in a plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the torus, and a second section angle in a second plane co-planar with the axis of rotation.
Preferably, the section has a first section angle and a first curvature in a first plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation of a torus extrapolated from the toroidal surface and a second section angle and a second curvature in a second plane co-planar with said axis of rotation, wherein the first curvature and the second curvature differ.
In order to preserve the shape of the wavefronts as they travel from the acoustic radiator assembly, the shape of the waveguide surface must be matched to that of the wavefronts in order not to disrupt the regularity of the radiation pattern. Matching occurs if the angle between the direction of travel of the wavefronts coming from the acoustic radiator assembly and a tangent to a nearby portion of the waveguide surface is approximately 90°.
Accordingly, it is preferred that horn wave guide is dual angle comprising a first pair of opposed waveguide surfaces and a second pair of waveguide surfaces. The first horn angle is defined as the convergence angle between the first pair of opposed surfaces. The second horn angle is defined as the convergence angle between the second pair of opposed surfaces.
In a preferred embodiment, the acoustic radiator assembly may comprise a plurality of individually driveable diaphragm elements, each having a rigid, acoustically radiating surface, the diaphragm elements being arranged such that their acoustically radiating surfaces together form said section from a toroidal surface.
In embodiments of the invention, the acoustic radiator assembly may further comprise a phase plug mounted in front of the diaphragm. In one embodiment, the phase plug has characteristics matched to those of the acoustically radiating surface of the diaphragm so as to maintain the shape of the wavefronts generated by the diaphragm. This type of phase plug is beneficial in that it constrains the air on which the diaphragm acts and thus increases the efficiency of the radiation/coupling. In another embodiment, the phase plug has characteristics mismatched to those of the diaphragm so as to cause dispersion of the wavefronts generated at the diaphragm as they pass through the phase plug. This type of phase plug can be used to extend the radiating angle of an acoustic radiator assembly beyond that which a said diaphragm can operate acceptably.
According to a second aspect of the invention, the present invention may provide an acoustic radiator assembly for a loudspeaker comprising a plurality of individually driveable diaphragm elements, each having a rigid, acoustically radiating surface, the diaphragm elements being arranged such that their acoustically radiating surfaces together form a section from a toroidal surface.
This multi-element diaphragm structure permits loudspeakers having a large acoustically radiating surface to be properly driven. In addition, the acoustically radiating surface, when driven, provides a good approximation to an ideal pulsating surface.
In the context of the present invention, the term “toroidal” should be construed broadly so as to encompass the case where the first curvature becomes very low compared with the second curvature or, in the limiting case, has zero curvature. Accordingly, a toroidal section within the meaning of the present invention also covers a cylinder-shaped section.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention are hereinafter described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
a) shows a loudspeaker in accordance with an embodiment of the invention including a first phase plug;
b) shows a section view of
a) shows a loudspeaker in accordance with an embodiment of the invention including a second phase plug;
b) shows a section view of
It will be appreciated that the first and second curvatures of the acoustic radiating surface 27 of the diaphragm 25, as a whole is the same as that of the individual diaphragm elements 25a-d. Likewise, the acoustic radiating surface 27 of the diaphragm 25 being only one element wide has the same second section or radiating angle as a single element 25a-d, namely θ2=85°. However, in the vertical direction, there are 4 diaphragm elements, whereby the first section or radiating angle of the acoustic radiating surface of the diaphragm 25 as a whole is 4 times that of an individual element 25a-d, namely θ1=96°. Thus, in the illustrated embodiment, the diaphragm 25 is segmented in only the vertical direction. In other embodiments, the diaphragm may be additionally or alternatively segmented in the horizontal direction. As used herein, ‘horizontal’ and ‘vertical’ are only used as a shorthand frame of reference to refer to the directions in which the radiating surface 27 extends in a direction corresponding to each of C1 and C2 respectively in the
The loudspeaker 20 further comprises a dual angle horn waveguide 40 which is arranged such that the array of diaphragm elements 25a-d occupy the throat region of the horn 40 and has inner waveguide surfaces which are generally flared and shaped to match the wavefronts generated by the diaphragm element 25a-d as described below. The horn 40 has a pair of opposed and generally horizontal waveguide surfaces 42, 44 as seen in
In use, when a signal is supplied to the loudspeaker 20, each of the driver units individually receives the signal at its respective voice coil 37 and responsive to that signal, the respective diaphragm elements 25a-d moves back and forth along the central axis X of its respective driver unit as described above. The motion of each diaphragm element is mechanically independent of the other diaphragm elements, but because of the relative orientation of the driver units and the fact that each is being driven by the same signal, the co-ordinated movement of diaphragm elements 25a-d and the overall shape of the surface which they together present to the air creates wavefronts having a curvature CH in the horizontal direction and a curvature CV in the vertical direction.
The shape of the horn's waveguide surfaces 42, 44, 46, 48 having been selected to match the shape of wavefronts coming from the acoustic radiator assembly 22, which in this embodiment equates to that determined by the geometry of the acoustically radiating surface 27, does not disrupt the regularity of the radiation pattern and so serves to keep the wavefront generated in practice a close approximation to the theoretical expectation. Nominally, matching occurs if the angle between the direction of travel of the wavefront as it comes from the acoustic radiator assembly 22 and a tangent to a nearby portion of the waveguide surface is approximately 90°. The required geometry of the waveguide surfaces 42, 44, 46, 48 can be readily appreciated from
Referring to
Referring to
In other embodiments (not shown), the acoustic radiator assembly 22 may comprise a single diaphragm. However, because of the difficulties of properly driving a large diaphragm, this is not a preferred arrangement. Accordingly, for many applications, the multi-element diaphragm construction, as shown in the drawings, is preferred. In other embodiments, arrays consisting of a larger number of diaphragm elements may be used. Since each diaphragm element is of a modest size, relative to its own driver unit, large loudspeaker structures may readily be constructed. It will be noted that by using a multi-element diaphragm and mounting the diaphragm elements in an arrangement in which the axis along which their respective acoustically radiating surfaces move, during use, are not parallel to one another, but rather perpendicular to the face of the overall acoustically radiating surface of which they form a part, the structure more closely approximates the idealised pulsating surface which is often assumed in design simulations.
In other embodiments, the acoustic radiator assembly 22 may further comprise a phase plug mounted in front of the diaphragm.
a) and (6) show a first phase plug 60 having baffles 62. Referring to the sectional view of
a) and 7(b) show a second phase plus 70 having baffles 72 and a toroidal outlet. The toroidal outlet is only positively illustrated by a dotted line in the sectional view in
The design of the phase plug 70 differs from that of the phase plug 60 in two key respects. First, in the nomenclature of
It will be appreciated that, since the acoustic radiator assembly 22 comprises a phase plug 70 that allows the acoustic radiation pattern generated by the diaphragm radiating surface 27 to disperse as it passes through the phase plug 70 and is thus re-shaped by it, although the vertical and horizontal horn angles θ3, θ4 are again selected to match the wavefronts coming from the acoustic radiator assembly 22, in this embodiment including a phase plug 70, the matching must be determined with respect to the wavefronts as they exit the phase plug, rather than at the point of generation at the acoustically radiating surface 27 as per the
In other embodiments (not shown), as an alternative to the static waveguide described above, the waveguide 40 is adapted to serve as a further acoustically radiating diaphragm. This diaphragm would operate over a lower frequency range and so does not need to have a toroidal shape. In one embodiment, all or part of the waveguide surfaces 42-48 are driven. By using the waveguide actively in this way, the operative frequency range of the loudspeaker can be extended to embrace lower frequencies. The waveguide 40 can be driven either independently from or in concert with the diaphragm 25 according to need. Preferably, the waveguide is used to radiate acoustic energy in the bass region and serve as a coincident acoustic source with the diaphragm which is used to radiate higher frequency acoustic energy.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0714474.4 | Jul 2007 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2008/002396 | 7/14/2008 | WO | 00 | 4/21/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/013460 | 1/29/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2127110 | Farrand | Aug 1938 | A |
2537141 | Klipsch | Jan 1951 | A |
4071112 | Keele, Jr. | Jan 1978 | A |
4308932 | Keele, Jr. | Jan 1982 | A |
4381831 | Putnam | May 1983 | A |
4390078 | Howze et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
5285025 | Yoshioka | Feb 1994 | A |
5750943 | Heinz | May 1998 | A |
5900593 | Adamson | May 1999 | A |
5925856 | Meyer et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6059069 | Hughes, II | May 2000 | A |
6170603 | Bachmann | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6393131 | Rexroat | May 2002 | B1 |
6466680 | Gelow et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6658128 | Yoshioka et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6712177 | Ureda | Mar 2004 | B2 |
20040240697 | Keele, Jr. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060153407 | Keele et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060153420 | Takase et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0680242 | Nov 1995 | EP |
1571876 | Jul 2005 | EP |
754901 | Aug 1956 | GB |
2211377 | Jun 1989 | GB |
2423908 | Sep 2006 | GB |
9853638 | Nov 1998 | WO |
2006092609 | Sep 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Office Action; 08775937.9; Jul. 19, 2012. |
International Search Report, Mar. 9, 2009. |
Written Opinion, Mar. 9, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110192674 A1 | Aug 2011 | US |