A magnetic coil may carry a large DC current and an AC ripple current. Any AC loss in the magnetic coil, even when the AC current is small compared to the DC current, may be significant.
One method of reducing AC losses (sometimes described in terms of reducing AC resistance) in a magnetic coil is to use litzendraht (litz) wire. Litz wire is constructed from a plurality of insulated wire strands, and, in theory, has lower AC resistance than a single wire strand of the same cross-sectional area. An AC current travels near the surface of a conductor; an effect known as skin effect. Litz wire may reduce this skin effect when properly twisted and woven. Another effect that causes losses in a magnetic coil is the proximity effect, which occurs where the magnetic field created by a first wire or strand produces eddy currents in a second wire or strand. Litz wire may reduce proximity effect.
One disadvantage of litz wire is that it has a higher DC resistance, compared to a single strand wire of the same cross sectional area, making it undesirable for applications where DC current is large compared to AC current. Litz wire also has a higher cost than single strand wire and foil.
Another technique for reducing AC losses in a magnetic coil is to use an optimized-shape wire winding that positions wire (which may be litz wire) away from any gaps in a magnetic core. Disadvantages of using optimized shape wire winding include a more difficult and expensive winding and, if litz wire is used, the same increased DC resistance.
Yet another technique for reducing AC losses in a magnetic coil is to use multiple small gaps in the magnetic core instead of a single large gap. However, this increases the cost of the magnetic coil; it has also been shown that an optimized winding shape may be superior to the use of the multi-gapped magnetic core approach.
Typically, magnetic coils that carry high DC current (e.g., high power inductors, flyback transformers, etc.) are constructed with foil windings. Foil windings have low DC resistance, but, as with a multi-layer winding, AC losses are, in some cases, proportional to the square of the number of layers. Magnetic coils used in power applications typically require an air gap in the magnetic core to prevent magnetic saturation, to control inductance and to store magnetic energy. In high frequency applications (also in low-frequency applications), such as those incorporating switching power converters the magnetic field near this air gap induces large AC losses in the magnetic coil, particularly, in portions of the winding near the gap.
Although the above techniques, particularly the optimized shape winding, may be effective, the DC current in designs incorporating these techniques is much larger than the AC current; it is therefore not acceptable to significantly increase DC resistance. For high DC current windings, copper foil is often used since it is possible to achieve a higher packing factor (the portion of the winding window containing copper) than can be achieved with round wire. However, copper foil windings are particularly susceptible to induced eddy current from the gap fringing field. This is because the fringing field contains magnetic flux components perpendicular to the plane of the foil, which can produce significant losses even when the AC current is much smaller than the DC current in the winding.
It is thus desirable to remove or minimize the effect of gap fringing field 32 on foil winding 30 to reduce AC losses without significantly increasing the DC resistance of magnetic coil 10.
The magnetic coil described hereinbelow uses a magnetic core with one or more gaps and a foil winding that does not extend completely across a winding window in the region of the gaps in the magnetic core, thus reducing the AC resistance of the magnetic coil and, hence, AC losses.
Copper foil winding 404 is cut away near gap 408 as illustrated by cavity 414. Cavity 414 illustrates a nearly semicircular cavity shape (i.e., the width of the largest foil gap gf is approximately equal to the width h of winding window 412) suitable for large AC currents (i.e., where the AC current is a large fraction of the DC current within foil winding 404). As the AC current becomes a smaller fraction of the DC current in foil winding 404, foil gap gf may be reduced since AC losses may be less significant. Since removal of foil to form cavity 414 increases DC losses in winding 404 but reduces AC losses (e.g. as compared to a winding 404 without cavity 414), the size and shape of cavity 414 near gap 408 may be adjusted to optimize the tradeoff between DC losses and AC losses.
There are several ways to explain certain advantages that may occur with this configuration. One explanation is that there is less copper in the region of gap 408, and so fewer eddy currents are induced by gap fringing field 415. Another explanation involves the distribution of high-frequency current in winding 404. That is, in a simple foil winding, with layers thick compared to a skin depth, opposing currents flow on opposite sides of the winding such that the bottom winding layer has current on the surface facing gap 408 that is N times the terminal current, where N is the number of turns (equal to the number of layers for a foil winding). This current is concentrated near gap 408, in the first layer. The high-frequency current mostly flows near exposed edges 405 of each turn of copper foil winding 404 (edges 405 are shown in window 412, but not all edges 405 are labeled, and edges 405 are not shown in window 410, for clarity of illustration). Since there is no intervening copper between where the AC current flows and gap 408, no additional (or appreciable) eddy currents are induced by the magnetic field caused by gap 408. Although exposed edges 405 created by cavity 414 are small compared to the overall foil cross sectional area (e.g., area of winding window 410), the resulting AC resistance is reduced (in comparison to that of the prior art, such as shown in
As gf increases beyond width h (see
Benefits may also exist in incorporating cavities in foil windings used with only high frequency AC currents.
Although an ideal cavity shape for minimum AC resistance may be semicircular, a ‘V’ shape may be easier to cut, and in many circumstances, may be used instead of the semicircular shape to save cost. The small improvement achieved with a semicircle gives better performance where large AC currents occur in the magnetic coil. Additionally, where the AC current is small, with respect to the DC current in the winding, the size of the cavity may be reduced in several ways: a) the width of the semicircle may be reduced, making it elliptical, b) the radius of the semicircle may be reduced (i.e., the winding layers furthest from the gap may not be cut out at all), and c) features of both an ellipse and a V may be used. Other shapes (which may or may not approximate a semicircle and/or a V) may be used for cavities 414 and 714 without departing from the scope hereof.
Winding window 1212 of magnetic coil 1200 has a width h. Since winding window 1212 has gaps 1216 and 1218 on either side, the optimum width gf of cavities 1222 and 1224 is equal to approximately h/2. Similarly, since winding window 1210 has dimensions equal to those of winding window 1212, the optimum width of cavity 1220 is also approximately h/2.
AC resistance can be further decreased in magnetic coil designs for large AC currents by including multiple gaps in the magnetic coil's magnetic core and by forming a cavity in the foil winding adjacent to each gap.
As appreciated, other configurations of foil cutouts may be used to form cavities of windings for magnetic coils with different numbers of gaps, or for magnetic coils with gaps in different positions. One example includes UU cores instead of EE cores (where ‘U’ and ‘E’ represent core piece shapes), and has gaps in both legs (and coils wound around each leg), or may have a gap in just one leg. In another example, UI or EI cores (where ‘U’, ‘I’ and ‘E’ represent core piece shapes) may be used with gaps at the joint between the ‘I’ piece and the ‘U’ or ‘E’ piece and a cavity correspondingly positioned.
Note that the invention also works well for current waveforms that contain one or more large low-frequency AC components and one or more smaller high-frequency AC components, if the frequencies of the low-frequency components are low enough that the resistance at those frequencies are near the dc resistance of the winding.
Changes may be made in the above methods and systems without departing from the scope hereof. It should thus be noted that the matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings should be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense. The following claims are intended to cover all generic and specific features described herein, as well as all statements of the scope of the present method and system, which, as a matter of language, might be said to fall there between.
This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/557,268, filed 29 Mar. 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2005/010487 | 3/29/2005 | WO | 00 | 10/19/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/096330 | 10/13/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2285798 | Bergtold | Jun 1942 | A |
3195088 | Rolland | Jul 1965 | A |
4047138 | Steigerwald | Sep 1977 | A |
4728390 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0461712 | Dec 1991 | EP |
576249 | Dec 1993 | EP |
1451842 | Oct 1976 | GB |
2037089 | Jul 1980 | GB |
WO 9217892 | Oct 1992 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080169893 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60557268 | Mar 2004 | US |