Low alloy cold-worked martensitic steel

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 4483722
  • Patent Number
    4,483,722
  • Date Filed
    Monday, May 24, 1982
    42 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 20, 1984
    40 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Skiff; Peter K.
    Agents
    • Pearne, Gordon, Sessions, McCoy, Granger & Tilberry
Abstract
A method of producing a low carbon, low alloy, martensitic, cold-worked steel is disclosed. A low alloy steel is provided having the ability to form an essentially martensitic structure upon air cooling from a temperature above its A.sub.cl. The steel is austenitized and then air cooled to form a martensitic structure. The steel is tempered and then cold-worked to reduce its cross section by about 1/32 to 1/8 inch to increase its tensile and yield strengths while at least maintaining its tempered hardness.
Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Mechanical properties of high strength steels generally depend upon melting practices, alloying elements, and heat treatments to provide particular mechanical characteristics for the intended purpose of the steel. High strength steel characterized by high tensile strengths, yield strengths, and toughness generally require strengthening, toughening, and hardening elements to attain the desired properties. As a general rule, alloying elements in steel promote a general decrease in the rate of austenite transformation to other phases, such as pearlite, bainite, and martensite, depending upon the rate of cooling. Typical alloying ingredients to enhance mechanical properties of steel are chromium, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, and silicon. Chromium increases the resistance to corrosion and oxidation, while increasing hardenability and promoting strength at high temperatures. Manganese increases the hardenability, and is relatively inexpensive. Molybdenum raises the grain coarsening temperature of austenite, deepens hardening, counteracts temper brittleness, and raises hot and creep strengths of the steel. Nickel strengthens unquenched steels, while silicon strengthens low alloy steels.
It has been the objective of metallurgists to provide optimum mechanical properties in steels while employing relatively low percentages of alloying elements. An example of such efforts is represented by the disclosure of U.S. Pat. No. 3,379,582, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, wherein the patentee produces a low alloy, high strength steel having a martensitic microstructure. According to that patent, the patentee provides an iron base alloy having from 0.20% to 0.30% carbon, 0.80% to 1.2% manganese, 3.25% to 4.00% nickel, 1.25% to 2.00% chromium, 0.25% to 0.50% molybdenum, 0.20% to 0.50% silicon and residual amounts of other elements. The patentee heat treats the alloy by heating above the critical temperature to form austenite, and then preferably air-cools the steel to form a martensitic microstructure. The alloying ingredients permit slow cooling by decreasing the rate of austenite transformation so that the microstructure is substantially all martensitic. The steel is tempered at about 500.degree. F. to raise the yield strength to 170,000 psi or higher and to slightly decrease the ultimate tensile strengths to about 215,000 psi. The hardness obtained in 5-inch and 8-inch sections was at least Rockwell C 38 (about 365 Brinell), which was measured at the bar center. Thus, the alloy produced by the patentee exhibits excellent tensile and yield strengths, while maintaining a relatively high hardness. Because of the ability of this alloy to air-cool to a martensitic structure, it was believed that the alloy could be formed into useful shapes by hot working techniques. It was assumed that cold working such a hard martensitic alloy would result in cracking, and that such working would deleteriously increase the hardness while reducing the ductility of the steel. As a general rule, cold working increases the tensile strength and hardness of the steel, while it reduces ductility, percentage elongation, and yield strength.





SUMMARY AND DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
This invention provides a technique for producing a low alloy, high strength, martensitic steel which is cold-worked in such a manner as to increase tensile strength and yield strength whie maintaining the as-tempered hardness of the steel.
According to this invention, a low alloy, high strength steel is prepared generally according to the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 3,379,582, the subject matter of which is incorporated herein by reference. That is to say, a melt is prepared containing between about 0.20% to 0.30% carbon, 0.80% to 1.2% manganese, 3.25% to 4.00% nickel, 1.25% to 2.00% chromium, 0.25% to 0.50% molybdenum, 0.20% to 0.50% silicon, and the balance iron with residual amounts of other elements. A specific example of such an alloy was prepared having 0.20% carbon, 0.90% manganese, 3.45% nickel, 1.45% chromium, 0.30% molybdenum, and 0.28% silicon. The alloy was prepared by conventional vacuum degassing techniques in an electric arc furnace and was then cast into ingots. The ingots were hot forged to rods 1.5 inches (Table I), 2 inches (Table II), 3 inches (Table III), and 4 inches (Table IV) in diameter. After cooling, the rods were normalized at an austenitizing temperature above the A.sub.c1 temperature of the alloy. A typical normalizing temperature for the alloy set forth above is 1750.degree. F. Substantially higher temperatures tend to cause grain coarsening with deleterious effects upon subsequent transformations. After through heating the rods, the rods were cooled in still air to a temperature below the M.sub.s temperature of the steel to transform the steel to an essentially martensitic structure. Thereafter the rods were tempered by heating the rods to a temperature below their A.sub.1 temperature. Alternately, the rods could be martempered by cooling the steel from its austenitizing temperature to a temperature below its A.sub.1 by, for example, quenching the austenitized steel in molten salt maintained at the desired tempering temperature. After the tempering step, some of the rods, as noted below, were cold-worked by reducing their diameter between about 1/32 and 1/8 inch, and preferably between about 1/32 and 1/16 inch. After cold working, the bars may be straightened by employing a Medart straightener, which not only straightens the bar but adds a degree of polish.
The cold-worked rods exhibited the following properties as compared to samples which were hot-rolled and heat-treated. In the following Tables, all of the samples were subjected to the identical heat treatment as set forth above, but samples 1, 2, and 3 were cold drawn, while samples 11, 22 and 33 were cold drawn and straightened.
TABLE I______________________________________ Yield Strength Tensile psi Elong. Red. of Size Strength 0.2% % in Area HardnessSample Inches psi offset "2" % BHN______________________________________A 1.495 161,500 149,500 16.0 57.8 363 1.500 1 1.489 159,500 149,000 15.0 60.1 341 1.49411 1.489 176,000 170,000 12.0 54.1 341 1.494B 1.508 171,000 152,500 16.0 55.7 363 1.511 2 1.461 177,500 172,500 11.0 55.7 341 1.46222 1.461 180,000 163,000 11.5 50.8 363 1.462C 1.502 171,000 153,000 17.0 56.8 363 1.504 3 1.442 184,500 180,000 11.0 52.5 34133 1.4405 186,000 177,000 11.00 53.4 363 1.4410______________________________________ A, B, C = Hot Rolled 1, 2, 3 = Cold Drawn between 1/32 and 1/8 inch 11, 22, 33 = Cold Drawn between 1/32 and 1/8 inch and straightened
TABLE II______________________________________ Yield Strength Tensile psi Elong. Red. of Size Strength 0.2% % in Area HardnessSample Inches psi offset "2" % BHN______________________________________D 3.031 156,750 133,250 16.0 50.8 341 3.052D 3.031 156,750 133,500 16.0 54.4 341 3.052 1 2.987 165,000 162,500 11.5 51.1 352 2.989 1 2.987 165,500 163,250 12.5 51.1 352 2.98911 2.990 175,500 173,750 12.0 51.4 363 2.99111 2.990 176,000 164,250 12.0 50.0 363 2.991E 3.026 156,000 135,000 15.5 50.8 341 3.045E 3.026 156,750 136,250 16.0 53.3 341 3.045 2 2.986 162,000 159,000 13.0 53.2 341 2.988 2 2.986 161,000 157,500 12.0 54.7 341 2.98822 2.887 174,000 171,500 11.0 48.6 363 2.99122 2.887 175,000 172,500 11.5 49.5 363 2.991F 3.023 161,000 139,000 16.0 52.2 352 3.048F 3.023 161,500 135,000 15.0 50.0 352 3.048 3 2.987 170,000 166,250 12.0 50.0 363 2.989 3 2.987 170,750 168,250 11.0 48.1 363 2.98933 2.990 177,500 172,500 11.5 48.4 363 2.99333 2.990 181,500 180,000 10.5 46.9 363 2.993______________________________________ D, E, F = Hot Rolled 1, 2, 3 = Cold Drawn between 1/32 and 1/8 inch 11, 22, 33 = Cold Drawn between 1/32 and 1/8 inch and straightened
TABLE III______________________________________ Yield Strength Tensile psi Elong. Red. of Size Strength 0.2% % in Area HardnessSample Inches psi offset "2" % BHN______________________________________G 2.014 156,750 138,000 17.0 57.8 341 2.020G 2.014 155,750 135,500 17.0 57.3 341 2.020 1 1.993 162,500 157,000 17.0 57.8 341 1.995 1 1.993 163,500 156,000 15.0 56.8 341 1.99511 1.993 165,770 160,000 13.5 55.7 352 1.99611 1.993 165,000 152,000 14.5 56.2 352 1.996H 2.014 164,000 147,500 17.0 56.0 363 2.026H 2.014 165,000 145,500 16.5 54.4 363 2.026 2 1.994 168,500 163,500 15.0 56.0 352 1.996 2 1.994 168,500 162,500 13.0 53.8 352 1.99622 1.992 174,000 170,000 11.5 50.3 363 1.99622 1.992 174,000 165,000 13.0 54.7 363 1.996J 2.012 165,000 146,250 16.5 54.7 363 2.021J 2.012 164,500 146,000 16.5 54.9 363 2.021 3 1.994 170,500 167,500 12.0 50.6 341 1.996 3 1.994 169,000 168,500 12.0 53.0 341 1.99633 1.993 172,500 166,750 12.0 51.9 363 1.99433 1.993 172,500 166,750 12.0 52.5 363 1.994______________________________________ G, H, J = Hot Rolled 1, 2, 3 = Cold Drawn between 1/32 and 1/8 inch 11, 22, 33 = Cold Drawn between 1/32 and 1/8 inch and straightened
TABLE IV______________________________________ Yield Strength Tensile psi Elong. Red. of Size Strength 0.2% % in Area HardnessSample Inches psi offset "2" % BHN______________________________________K 4.022 159,250 135,000 16.0 53.8 352 4.032K 4.022 158,750 137,500 16.5 54.7 352 4.032 1 3.996 162,500 162,500 13.0 53.3 341 3.999 1 3.996 167,500 165,000 12.0 55.2 341 3.99911 3.998 165,000 165,000 14.0 55.2 341 4.00011 3.998 162,500 161,000 14.0 53.8 341 4.000L 4.030 159,500 139,000 16.0 55.5 352 4.042L 4.030 160,000 139,500 16.0 54.1 352 4.042 2 3.995 160,750 156,500 15.0 55.5 352 3.999 2 3.995 161,500 157,500 13.5 51.7 352 3.99922 3.994 163,750 163,750 12.5 53.3 341 3.99722 3.994 163,750 163,500 12.0 52.2 341 3.997M 4.023 156,500 134,500 16.0 52.2 363 4.033M 4.023 157,500 133,250 16.5 55.5 363 4.033 3 3.996 161,250 161,250 14.0 54.4 331 3.999 3 3.996 159,500 159,500 14.0 53.6 331 3.99933 3.994 158,250 155,000 13.5 54.4 331 3.99633 3.994 158,000 157,500 13.0 53.8 331 3.996______________________________________ K, L, M = Hot Rolled 1, 2, 3 = Cold Drawn between 1/32 and 1/8 inch 11, 22, 33 = Cold Drawn between 1/32 and 1/8 inch and straightened
As may be seen, hot rolled samples A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, L, and M exhibit excellent tensile strengths, yield strengths, elongation, and hardness. With such steels, increases in tensile strengths and yield strengths are to be expected upon cold rolling or drawing. It would also be expected that hardness would increase along with tensile and yield strengths. However, as is evident from the foregoing Tables, the Brinell hardness in many cases remained the same after cold working with a reduction in diameter of between 1/32 and 1/8 inch, while, surprisingly, in some of the cases, the Brinell hardness actually dropped.
It is evident from the foregoing that a low-carbon, low-alloy martensitic steel has been provided which exhibits acceptably high tensile and yield strengths without an undue increase in hardness.
It should be evident that this disclosure is by way of example and that various changes may be made by adding, modifying or eliminating details without departing from the fair scope of the teaching contained in this disclosure. The invention is therefore not limited to particular details of this disclosure except to the extent that the following claims are necessarily so limited.
Claims
  • 1. A method of producing a low carbon, low alloy, martensitic, cold-worked steel comprising the steps of providing a steel having from 0.20% to 0.30% carbon, 0.80% to 1.2% manganese, 3.25% to 4.00% nickel, 1.25% to 2.00% chromium, 0.25% to 0.50% molybdenum, 0.20% to 0.50% silicon, and the balance iron and residual amounts of other elements, austenitizing said steel by heating said steel to a temperature above its A.sub.3 temperature, air cooling said steel to a temperature below its M.sub.3 temperature to transform said steel to an essentially martensitic structure, tempering said steel by heating said steel to or maintaining the steel at a temperature below its A.sub.1 temperature to obtain a hardness of not greater than about 456 Brinell, and a final treating step consisting of cold working said steel at ambient temperature to reduce its cross section by about 1/32 to 1/8 inch to increase its tensile and yield strengths without substantially increasing its tempered hardness and maintaining its elongation percent at above about 10.5 and its reduction of area percent at above about 46.9.
  • 2. A method according to claim 1, wherein said steel is cooled from its austenitizing temperature to a temperature below its A.sub.1 temperature and is held at that temperature unitl its internal temperature stablizes and then cooling the alloy to ambient temperature.
  • 3. A method according to claim 1, wherein said alloy is cooled from its austenitizing temperature to ambient temperature and then reheated to a temperature below its A.sub.1 temperature, and then cooled to ambient temperature.
  • 4. A method according to claim 1, wherein said alloy is straightened after said cold working.
  • 5. A method according to claim 1, wherein said cold working comprises cold drawing said steel to reduce its cross sectional area.
  • 6. A low carbon, low alloy, martensitic steel produced in accordance with the method set forth in claim 1.
US Referenced Citations (1)
Number Name Date Kind
3379582 Dickinson Apr 1968
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
2238768 Feb 1975 FRX
44122 Nov 1972 JPX
782356 Sep 1957 GBX
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Iron Age, Feb. 7, 1963, "Steel Bars Climb to 400,000 psi", pp. 85-87.