This application relates to tools for driving threaded fasteners and the like and, in particular, to sockets and associated driving tools such as rachet wrenches, breaker bars and the like.
Typically, fastener driving sockets have a driving end with a driver receptacle, typically square in transverse cross section, and a driven output end with a fastener-receiving receptacle, which may have any of a number of polygonal shapes, such as square, hex, double hex and the like. Typically, sockets are provided in sets with different sizes for respectively driving different-sized fasteners. Socket sizes vary with the size of the fastener to be driven. Typically, both the length and the diameter of a socket will change, as will the depth of the fastener-receiving and driver-receiving receptacles, in order to provide adequate strength. Certain of these dimensions are standardized by industry standards-setting organizations.
In certain applications it has become desirable to utilize somewhat shortened sockets to provide additional clearance in tight work spaces. Heretofore, this has been accomplished by shortening the depth of the fastener-receiving receptacle. This has been relatively easy to accomplish, since, typically, the standard fastener-receiving receptacle depth is substantially greater than the axial thickness or height of the standard fastener for which it is sized, in order to allow clearance space, such as when driving a nut onto a stud or bolt. But the shortening which can be effected in this manner necessarily reduces the available clearance space.
This application describes a system for providing low-profile socket and associated drive systems which avoid the disadvantages of prior systems while affording additional structural and operating advantages.
An aspect of the system described is that it provides significantly lower profile sockets than have heretofore been possible with a conventional internal square drive configuration.
In connection with the foregoing aspect, a further aspect is the provision of a socket with a reduced-depth driver receptacle.
A further aspect is the provision of a socket drive system which provides lowering of the profile of both the socket and the associated male driver.
A still further aspect is the provision of a system of the type set forth, which provides increased torque strength as compared to standard-length socket drive systems.
Yet another aspect is the provision of a low-profile socket driver which is useable with standard-length sockets.
A still additional aspect is the provision of a low-profile socket which has a reduced-depth drive receptacle which is still useable with standard-length drivers.
Certain ones of these an additional aspect may be attained by providing a tool driver comprising a body having a drive portion defining drive surfaces, the drive portion having a central axis and a nominal width measured transverse to the axis, each drive surface having first and second ends spaced apart axially by a drive length which is less than the nominal width.
Further aspects may be attained by providing a tool driver of the type set forth, wherein the drive portion has an arcuate detent portion extending from a drive surface in a direction substantially perpendicular to the central axis, the detent portion having a diameter less than one-half the nominal width.
Still further aspects may be attained by providing a male tool driver adapted to be received in an associated drive receptacle which has formed in an inner surface thereof an arcuate detent recess having a first diameter, the male tool driver comprising a drive body shaped and dimensioned to be mateably received in an associated drive receptacle and having a detent cavity formed laterally in a side thereof, a detent ball captured in the cavity and resiliently urged to a rest position projecting laterally therefrom for engagement in the detent recess when the drive body is disposed in the receptacle, the ball having a second diameter substantially less than the first diameter.
Additional aspects may be attained by providing a tool drive system comprising a female drive body having a drive receptacle formed therein with a central axis, the receptacle having an axial drive depth and a nominal width measured transverse to the axis; and a male drive body having a drive portion with an axial length and shaped and dimensioned to be mateably received in the receptacle, each of the drive depth and the drive length being less than the nominal width.
Still further aspects may be attained by providing a method of reducing the overall length of a drive system which includes a female driver with a drive receptacle having a drive axis and an arcuate detent recess in a side wall thereof, and a male driver shaped and dimensioned to be mateably received in the receptacle and having a detent ball projecting from a side thereof, the method comprising reducing the diameter of the ball and correspondingly reducing the axial length of the male driver, and so positioning the reduced-diameter ball on the male driver that it will engage in the detent recess when the male driver is received in the receptacle.
For the purpose of facilitating an understanding of the subject matter sought to be protected, there are illustrated in the accompanying drawings embodiments thereof, from an inspection of which, when considered in connection with the following description, the subject matter sought to be protected, its construction and operation, and many of its advantages should be readily understood and appreciated.
Referring to
The drive square 13 is adapted to be used with an associated standard-length socket (not shown). However, there is illustrated in
Also illustrated in
This reduced length L2 allows for adequate wall thickness between the end surface 36 of the drive square and the ball cavity 34, so that the ball location on the square can remain close to the current standard dimension. The wall thickness T2 allows the embossing tool to move material completely around the ball and not push the material at the end surface 36 of the drive square outward away from the ball.
If, alternatively, an annular ring seated in a groove were to be used for retention instead of a ball and spring, this ratio provides adequate length to ensure that the ring will be retained in its associated groove. This ratio also locates the ball 35, which is about 50% of the standard size ball, to engage the standard detent recess toward the driver end of the socket.
It has been found that this length reduction can be effected without adversely affecting the strength of the drive square 33 and this is effected principally by utilizing a detent ball 35 which has a diameter approximately one-half that of the detent ball 15. Accordingly, the distance T2 that the recess 34 is spaced from the end surface 36 may be substantially less than the corresponding distance T1 of the drive square 13.
The distance from the shoulder 32 to the center line of the ball 35 (dimension C1 in
A significant aspect is that the drive length L2 of the drive square 33 is less than the nominal width W (
Referring to
It can be seen that the overall length of the socket 40 is substantially less than that of the socket 20. This is effected by shortening the depths of both of the receptacles 42 and 45. The axial depth L4 of the driver-receiving receptacle 42 may be very slightly greater than the length L2 of the associated low-profile drive square 33, whereas the depth of the fastener-receiving receptacle 45 is less than the maximum hexagon mandrel insertion per ASME B 107.5 m-1994, in this case approximately 85% of that standard. The latter depth is selected so as to minimize the overall length of the socket while still affording adequate engagement with the associated fastener for a wide range of fastener types.
As is apparent from the figures, the axial depth L4 of the driver-receiving receptacle 42 is less than the nominal width of that receptacle, which is very slightly greater than the nominal width W of the male drive square 33 of the same nominal size, for proper mating engagement of the two. Also, the socket 40 may have the same axial distance C2 from the end of the socket to the center of the ball detent recess 43 as in the socket 20, so that the socket 40 may be usable with both standard drive heads (
It will be appreciated that, in the illustrated embodiment, the overall length of the socket 40 could be further reduced by shortening the depth of the recess 47 which communicates with both of the receptacles 42 and 45. In the event that the socket is cold formed, there must be a web of material separating those receptacles, but the thickness of the web could be reduced to the minimum necessary to prevent the opposing punches from engaging each other and damaging the cold forming machinery. Where opposing punches are not used, the recess 47 could be effectively eliminated.
Referring to
Referring now to
It can be seen that, since the driver-receiving receptacle 62 need only be long enough to accommodate the reduced-length drive square 53, the receptacle 62 has an axial depth L5 which is only very slightly greater than the axial length L3 of the drive square 50 (see
It will be appreciated that, since the axial length L3 of the drive square 53 and the axial depth L5 of the driver-receiving receptacle 62 are even smaller than the comparable lengths and depths for the drive head 30 and socket 40 of
These relationships are illustrated in Table I, which sets forth the square drive length, the detent ball diameter and the “Ball Location” (axial distance from ball center to shoulder 12, 32 or 52) for standard (13), low profile (33) and very low profile (53) drive squares for three different nominal drive square sizes or widths (designated “W”). The sizes illustrated are for one-quarter inch, three-eights inch and one-half inch drives.
It can be seen that, for all sizes, the ratio of the axial square drive length to the nominal width is substantially 0.854 for the low profile drive square 33 and is substantially 0.572 for the very low profile drive square 53. However, for the standard square drive, corresponding to that of
It can also be seen from
By use of the foregoing techniques, the overall socket length may be reduced by about 40% as compared with standard-length sockets, thereby providing additional clearance in tight work areas without compromising torsional strength. By reducing the length of the drive square and the depth of the driver-receiving receptacle of the socket by about 53% each, as compared with standard lengths and depths, to distances found experimentally to achieve the same torsional strength as the standard-length drive square and standard-depth driver receptacle, additional working clearance is obtained without a reduction in strength.
More importantly, by reducing the depth of the fastener-receiving receptacle of the socket, while still maintaining full engagement with the fastener, increased torsional strength is obtained, at least in smaller-sized sockets, as compared to standard-length sockets when tested with a ratchet handle. In particular, because the ratchet also produces a bending moment load, the shorter the socket, the lower the bending moment. In other words, there is a certain amount of tolerance clearance between the socket and the associated drive square and associated fastener which can permit a slight tilt of the socket axis in use with respect to the axis of the fastener being driven. The longer the overall length of the socket, the greater can be the radial distance from the fastener axis to the socket axis and, therefore, the greater the bending moment and corresponding losses in torque transfer to the fastener. The increased strength obtained by providing a low-profile socket is achieved, while also obtaining additional clearance for working in close quarters. Further, the socket retention on the external drive square is achieved with a reduced-diameter ball and spring so as not to reduce the square strength, while still allowing engagement into a shortened internal square receptacle.
By increasing wall thickness slightly on larger sizes and/or increasing the blend radius at the bottom of the fastener-receiving receptacle, additional torsional strength may be obtained.
The manufacture of the sockets can be accomplished by using existing cold form tooling. Reduction of the distance from the bottom of the driver-receiving receptacle to the bottom of the fastener-receiving receptacle may be effected by simply causing the same cold form tooling to punch deeper in the material.
Table II shows dimensions for the very low profile socket 60, the low-profile socket 40 and a standard (“Std”) socket, such as the socket 20, having a standard-depth driver-receiving receptacle corresponding, respectively, to the drive squares of Table I and for the same three drive sizes. In this table, the dimension “Sq Depth” refers to the axial depth of the driver-receiving receptacle (see distance L4 in
It will be appreciated that the certain socket dimensions will be slightly greater than corresponding drive square dimensions to accommodate mating engagement of the parts. Furthermore, it will be understood that, throughout this application, all dimensions given are targets and are subject to a tolerance range, such as for manufacturing variations.
While particular embodiments have been shown and described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made without departing from the principles of the socket and drive system in its broader aspects. The matter set forth in the foregoing description and accompanying drawings is offered by way of illustration only and not as a limitation.
This application claims the benefit of the filing date of provisional application Ser. No. 60/366,895, filed Mar. 22, 2002 and entitled “Low Clearance Socket and Drive System.”
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US03/08876 | 3/21/2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60366895 | Mar 2002 | US |