1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates generally to circuitry design, more specifically, the invention relates to modeling of an anti-resonance circuit for a central processing unit.
2. Background Art
As today's computer systems operate at frequencies exceeding 1 GHz, the demands on internal power supplies also increase. For instance, as the technology is scaled smaller and faster, the power supply voltage must decrease. However, as the internal clock rates rise and more functions are integrated into microprocessors and application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), the total power consumed must increase. These demands require the internal power supply to respond quickly and reliably without significant overshoot, undershoot, or ringing of the supplied voltage.
Obviously, the design of the power system is critical to meeting these stringent requirements. A critical part of the design process is the modeling of the system. Typically, a model is used to simulate the system's performance so that design decisions can be made based on its results. The key questions in developing a model are: (1) the level of complexity it will entail; and (2) the degree of accuracy it will provide with its results. As a general rule, a more complex model has greater accuracy in its results. However, a complex model may take several days of operation just to simulate a few micro-seconds of system time.
Of these components, the model of the chip 20 is the most difficult to develop. As the chips have achieved greater and greater speeds, these circuits have become more and more sensitive to the effects of parasitic inductance. The parasitic inductance can come from such sources as bond wires, IC package leads, and external supply lines that provide operating power. The problem with such characteristics is that they form a very high supply line impedance at a resonance frequency. This may lead to circuit oscillation 34 as shown in
Prior art methods of controlling parasitic inductance include connecting an external capacitor between the supply leads. This connection creates a passive bypass that decreases the supply line oscillation due to external inductances. However, it does not significantly reduce the oscillation caused by internal inductances. Another prior art method includes connecting an on-chip capacitor between the internal supply leads. The capacitor acts as a bypass in the same manner as an external capacitor. However, in order to be effective, the internal capacitor must be very large. This has the drawback of occupying a significant portion of the chip area. Consequently, this method is generally undesirable when minimization of the die area is of great importance.
Another prior art approach involves increasing the amount of charge stored or delivered to a given amount by actively increasing the voltage variation across their terminals with added on-chip de-coupling capacitance.
A capacitance amplification factor (G) represents the charge supplied to the grid by the switched capacitors normalized to the charge furnished by regular de-coupled capacitors given the same supply voltage variation. The amplification can be expressed as G=(k+n−1)/(k*n2), where n is the number of stacks and k is the voltage regulation tolerance. With each capacitor having a value (Cd), the equivalent unstacked capacitance of Cd*n is reduced to Cd/n upon stacking with a total stack voltage of Vdd*n.
a shows a schematic 44 of an implementation of the method of
Instantaneous voltage supply variation (Vinst) is monitored by coupling the Vdd and Vss onto the comparator 56 input that is dynamically biased about a reference voltage (Vave). Vave is a high-pass filtered version of the local ((Vdd−Vss)/2. Its low frequency cutoff clears the low end resonance range, but it also rejects the tracking of low-frequency disturbances that are not due to resonance. The coupled Vinst feed the main negative feedback loop as charge is pumped in and out of the switched capacitors 46 and 48 coupled to the Vdd/Vss grid in an attempt to defeat the voltage variations. The compensated high frequency cutoff ensures stable loop response while also clearing the high end of the resonance range.
b shows the operation of the circuit shown in
The net result is that this analog circuit described herein senses when the supply is collapsing and then it acts by charging/discharging to ensure stability in the power supply. However, a model of such a package/chip anti-resonance circuit is needed that provides accurate results in an acceptable amount of simulation time.
In some aspects, the invention relates to an apparatus for simulating an anti-resonance circuit of a microprocessor, including a simulated load model, a simulated transistor that simulates at least one high frequency capacitance of the anti-resonance circuit, where the simulated transistor is connected in parallel with the simulated load model; and a simulated capacitor that simulates an intrinsic capacitance of a section of the microprocessor, where the simulated capacitor is connected in parallel with the simulated load model.
In other aspects, the invention relates to a method for simulating an anti-resonance circuit of a microprocessor, including simulating a load of the anti-resonance circuit, simulating at least one high-frequency capacitance in parallel with the simulated load, and simulating a section of the microprocessor's intrinsic capacitance in parallel with the simulated load.
In other aspects, the invention relates to an apparatus for modeling an anti-resonance circuit of a microprocessor, including a processor, memory, and instructions residing in the memory and executable by the processor to simulate a load of the anti-resonance circuit with a simulated resistor, simulate a high frequency capacitance of the anti-resonance circuit with a simulated transistor connected in parallel with the simulated resistor, and simulate an intrinsic capacitance in parallel with the simulated resistor.
Other aspects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description and the appended claims.
a shows a schematic of a prior art tracking loop and monitor charge pump loop.
b shows a graph a the charging and discharging cycle of the circuit shown in
a shows a block diagram of bump and grid models of a chip model in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
b shows a block diagram of channel models and section models of a chip model in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. Like items in the drawings are shown with the same reference numbers.
While
a and 7b show a block diagram 75 of a model of the power distribution system of a chip in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
While
In an actual anti-resonance circuit, such as shown by example in
The resulting model represents an advantage in modeling of anti-resonance circuits of microprocessor chips by providing a low complexity model with an excellent simulation time. The model further provides flexibility in accurately modeling the system performance in AC analysis.
While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate that other embodiments can be devised which do not depart from the scope of the invention as disclosed herein. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be limited only by the attached claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3808370 | Jackson et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
4290036 | Moulding et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4459566 | Lane | Jul 1984 | A |
4746879 | Ma et al. | May 1988 | A |
4810922 | Hirsch | Mar 1989 | A |
4949055 | Leitl | Aug 1990 | A |
5223653 | Kunimoto et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5340942 | Kunimoto | Aug 1994 | A |
5412349 | Young et al. | May 1995 | A |
5513090 | Bhattacharya et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5731965 | Cheng et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5761479 | Huang et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6075491 | Dakeya et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6104255 | Goma et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110219 | Jiang | Aug 2000 | A |
6188366 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6240246 | Evans | May 2001 | B1 |
6370678 | Culler | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6396316 | Cruz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6429632 | Forbes et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441640 | Gauthier et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456107 | Gauthier et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6483341 | Gauthier et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6501328 | Gauthier et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6571184 | Anderson et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6781355 | Gauthier et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6789241 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6842351 | Gauthier et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850878 | Smith et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
20010020876 | Tsukagoshi et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020011885 | Ogawa et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020089347 | Gauthier et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020143509 | Gauthier et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020143509 A1 | Oct 2002 | US |