This invention relates to wireless communication and, more particularly, to techniques for effective wireless communication in the presence of fading and other degradations.
The most effective technique for mitigating multipath fading in a wireless radio channel is to cancel the effect of fading at the transmitter by controlling the transmitter's power. That is, if the channel conditions are known at the transmitter (on one side of the link), then the transmitter can pre-distort the signal to overcome the effect of the channel at the receiver (on the other side). However, there are two fundamental problems with this approach. The first problem is the transmitter's dynamic range. For the transmitter to overcome an x dB fade, it must increase its power by x dB which, in most cases, is not practical because of radiation power limitations, and the size and cost of amplifiers. The second problem is that the transmitter does not have any knowledge of the channel as seen by the receiver (except for time division duplex systems, where the transmitter receives power from a known other transmitter over the same channel). Therefore, if one wants to control a transmitter based on channel characteristics, channel information has to be sent from the receiver to the transmitter, which results in throughput degradation and added complexity to both the transmitter and the receiver.
Other effective techniques are time and frequency diversity. Using time interleaving together with coding can provide diversity improvement. The same holds for frequency hopping and spread spectrum. However, time interleaving results in unnecessarily large delays when the channel is slowly varying. Equivalently, frequency diversity techniques are ineffective when the coherence bandwidth of the channel is large (small delay spread).
It is well known that in most scattering environments antenna diversity is the most practical and effective technique for reducing the effect of multipath fading. The classical approach to antenna diversity is to use multiple antennas at the receiver and perform combining (or selection) to improve the quality of the received signal.
The major problem with using the receiver diversity approach in current wireless communication systems, such as IS-136 and GSM, is the cost, size and power consumption constraints of the receivers. For obvious reasons, small size, weight and cost are paramount. The addition of multiple antennas and RF chains (or selection and switching circuits) in receivers is presently not feasible. As a result, diversity techniques have often been applied only to improve the up-link (receiver to base) transmission quality with multiple antennas (and receivers) at the base station. Since a base station often serves thousands of receivers, it is more economical to add equipment to base stations rather than the receivers.
Recently, some interesting approaches for transmitter diversity have been suggested. A delay diversity scheme was proposed by A. Wittneben in “Base Station Modulation Diversity for Digital SIMULCAST,” Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 41st), pp. 848-853, May 1991, and in “A New Bandwidth Efficient Transmit Antenna Modulation Diversity Scheme For Linear Digital Modulation,” in Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IICC '93), pp. 1630-1634, May 1993. The proposal is for a base station to transmit a sequence of symbols through one antenna, and the same sequence of symbols—but delayed—through another antenna.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,479,448, issued to Nambirajan Seshadri on Dec. 26, 1995, discloses a similar arrangement where a sequence of codes is transmitted through two antennas. The sequence of codes is routed through a cycling switch that directs each code to the various antennas, in succession. Since copies of the same symbol are transmitted through multiple antennas at different times, both space and time diversity are achieved. A maximum likelihood sequence estimator (MLSE) or a minimum mean squared error (MMSE) equalizer is then used to resolve multipath distortion and provide diversity gain. See also N. Seshadri, J. H. Winters, “Two Signaling Schemes for Improving the Error Performance of FDD Transmission Systems Using Transmitter Antenna Diversity,” Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 43rd), pp. 508-511, May 1993; and J. H. Winters, “The Diversity Gain of Transmit Diversity in Wireless Systems with Rayleigh Fading,” Proceedings of the 1994 ICC/SUPERCOMM, New Orleans, Vol. 2, pp. 1121-1125, May 1994.
Still another interesting approach is disclosed by Tarokh, Seshadri, Calderbank and Naguib in U.S. application Ser. No. 08/847,635, filed Apr. 25, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,115,427, (based on a provisional application filed Nov. 7, 1996), where symbols are encoded according to the antennas through which they are simultaneously transmitted, and are decoded using a maximum likelihood decoder. More specifically, the process at the transmitter handles the information in blocks of M1 bits, where M1 is a multiple of M2, i.e., M1=k*M2. It converts each successive group of M2 bits into information symbols (generating thereby k information symbols), encodes each sequence of k information symbols into n channel codes (developing thereby a group of n channel codes for each sequence of k information symbols), and applies each code of a group of codes to a different antenna.
Yet another approach is disclosed by Alamouti and Tarokh in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/074,224, filed May 5, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,185,258, and titled “Transmitter Diversity Technique for Wireless Communications” where symbols are encoded using only negations and conjugations, and transmitted in a manner that employs channel diversity.
Still another approach is disclosed by the last-mentioned inventors in a U.S. application filed Jul. 14, 1998, based on provisional 60/052,689 filed Jul. 17, 1997, titled “Combined Array Processing and Space-Time Coding,” where symbols are divided into groups, where each group is transmitted over a separate group of antennas and is encoded with a group code C that is a member of a product code.
An advance in the art is realized with a transmitter that employs a trellis coder followed by a block coder. Correspondingly, the receiver comprises a Viterbi decoder followed by a block decoder. Advantageously, the block coder and decoder employ time-space diversity coding which, illustratively, employs two transmitter antennas and one receiver antenna.
TCM encoder 10 generates complex numbers that represent constellation symbols, and block encoder 20 encodes (adjacent) pairs of symbols in the manner described in the aforementioned Ser. No. 09/074,224 application. That is, symbols s0 and s1, forming a pair, are sent to antenna 31 and antenna 32, respectively, and in the following time period symbols −s1* and s0* are sent to antennas 31 and 32, respectively. Thereafter, symbols s2 and s3 are sent to antenna 31 and 32, respectively, etc. Thus, encoder 20 creates channel diversity that results from signals traversing from the transmitter to the receiver at different times and over different channels.
The signals transmitted by antennas 31 and 32 are received by a receiver after traversing the airlink and suffering a multiplicative distortion and additive noise. Hence, the received signals at the two consecutive time intervals during which the signals s0, s1, −s1*, and s0* are sent correspond to:
r0(t)=h0s0+h1s1+n0, (1)
and
r1(t)=h1s0*−h0s1*+n1, (2)
where h0 represents the channel from antenna 31, h1 represents the channel from antenna 32, n0 is the received noise at the first time interval, and n1 is the received noise at the second time interval.
The receiver comprises a receive antenna 40, a two-branch space block combiner 50, and a Viterbi decoder 60. The receiver also includes a channel estimator; but since that is perfectly conventional and does not form a part of the invention,
{tilde over (s)}0={tilde over (h)}0*r0+{tilde over (h)}1r1* (3)
and
{tilde over (s)}1={tilde over (h)}1*r0−{tilde over (h)}0r1*, (4)
and those signals are applied to Viterbi decoder 60.
The Viterbi decoder builds the following metric for the hypothesized branch symbol s1 corresponding to the first transmitted symbol s0:
M(s0,si)=d2[{tilde over (s)}0,(|{tilde over (h)}0|2+|{tilde over (h)}1|2)si]. (5)
Similarly, the Viterbi decoder builds the following metric for the hypothesized branch symbol si corresponding to the first transmitted symbol s1:
M(s1,si)=d2[{tilde over (s)}1,(|{tilde over (h)}0|2+|{tilde over (h)}1|2)si]. (6)
(Additional metrics are similarly constructed in arrangements that employ a larger number of antennas and a correspondingly larger constellation of signals transmitted at any one time.) If Trellis encoder 10 is a multiple TCM encoder, then the Viterbi decoder builds the following metric:
M└(s0,s1),(si,sj)┘=M(s0,si)+M(s1,sj), (7)
or equivalently,
M[(s0,s1),(si,sj)]=d2(r0,{tilde over (h)}0si+{tilde over (h)}1sj)+d2(r1,{tilde over (h)}1si*−{tilde over (h)}0s*j). (8)
The Viterbi decoder outputs estimates of the transmitted sequence of signals.
The above presented an illustrative embodiment. However, it should be understood that various modifications and alternations might be made by a skilled artisan without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent Ser. No. 13/691,505, filed Nov. 30, 2012 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,731,107), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/650,007, filed Dec. 30, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,351,545), which is a continuation of Ser. No. 11/018,780, filed Dec. 21, 2004 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,643,568), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/334,343, filed Dec. 30, 2002 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,853,688), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/005,095, filed Dec. 3, 2001 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,807,240), which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/167,422, filed Oct. 5, 1998 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,501,803), which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/063,794, filed Oct. 31, 1997, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3633107 | Brady | Jan 1972 | A |
3978408 | Gupta et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4001692 | Fenwick et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4099121 | Fang | Jul 1978 | A |
4281411 | Bonn et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4369516 | Byrns | Jan 1983 | A |
4567464 | Siegel | Jan 1986 | A |
4577332 | Brenig | Mar 1986 | A |
4675880 | Davarian | Jun 1987 | A |
4733402 | Monsen | Mar 1988 | A |
4763331 | Matsumoto | Aug 1988 | A |
4953183 | Bergmans et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5022053 | Chung et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5029185 | Wei | Jul 1991 | A |
5088113 | Wei | Feb 1992 | A |
5101501 | Gilhousen et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5109390 | Gilhousen et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5127025 | Okanoue | Jun 1992 | A |
5170413 | Hess et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5193102 | Meidan et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5202903 | Okanoue | Apr 1993 | A |
5283780 | Schuchman et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5305353 | Weerackody | Apr 1994 | A |
5319677 | Kim | Jun 1994 | A |
5369412 | Tsujimoto | Nov 1994 | A |
5396518 | How | Mar 1995 | A |
5416797 | Gilhousen et al. | May 1995 | A |
5418798 | Wei | May 1995 | A |
5422913 | Wilkinson | Jun 1995 | A |
5442627 | Viterbi et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5457712 | Weerackody | Oct 1995 | A |
5461646 | Anvari | Oct 1995 | A |
5461696 | Frank et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5467374 | Chennakeshu et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5479448 | Seshadri | Dec 1995 | A |
5481572 | Skold et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5487091 | Jasper et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5499272 | Bottomley | Mar 1996 | A |
5524125 | Tsujimoto | Jun 1996 | A |
5530725 | Koch | Jun 1996 | A |
5553102 | Jasper et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5613219 | Vogel et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5619533 | Dent | Apr 1997 | A |
5675590 | Alamouti | Oct 1997 | A |
5680419 | Bottomley | Oct 1997 | A |
5781845 | Dybdal et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787131 | Bottomley | Jul 1998 | A |
5790570 | Heegard et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790598 | Moreland et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5819168 | Golden et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822380 | Bottomley | Oct 1998 | A |
5838728 | Alamouti et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838742 | AbuDayya | Nov 1998 | A |
5848103 | Weerackody | Dec 1998 | A |
5859870 | Tsujimoto | Jan 1999 | A |
5859879 | Bolgiano et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5924034 | Dupuy | Jul 1999 | A |
5933421 | Alamouti et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943372 | Gans et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949833 | Weerackody | Sep 1999 | A |
5960039 | Martin et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5991273 | Abu-Dayya | Nov 1999 | A |
5991331 | Chennakeshu et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999826 | Whinnett | Dec 1999 | A |
6031474 | Kay et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034987 | Chennakeshu et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038263 | Kotzin et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038272 | Golden et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044120 | Bar-David et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6067324 | Harrison | May 2000 | A |
6081566 | Molnar et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088408 | Calderbank et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094465 | Stein et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097771 | Foschini | Aug 2000 | A |
6101399 | Raleigh et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115427 | Calderbank | Sep 2000 | A |
6128355 | Backman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137843 | Chennakeshu et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144711 | Raleigh et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6144771 | Li et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154485 | Harrison | Nov 2000 | A |
6173005 | Kotzin et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178196 | Naguib et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185258 | Alamouti et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185266 | Kuchi et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188736 | Lo et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192256 | Whinnett | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6298082 | Harrison | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304581 | Chen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317411 | Whinnett et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317466 | Foschini et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327299 | Meszko | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333953 | Bottomley et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335954 | Bottomley et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6377631 | Raleigh | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377812 | Rashid-Farrokhi et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393074 | Mandyam et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6411257 | Sorelius et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411612 | Halford et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
RE37802 | Fattouche et al. | Jul 2002 | E |
6430231 | Calderbank | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452981 | Raleigh et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6470043 | Lo et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6501803 | Alamouti et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6542556 | Kuchi et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549585 | Naguib et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6728307 | Derryberry et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6741635 | Lo et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6775329 | Alamouti et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6807240 | Alamouti et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6853688 | Alamouti et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6888899 | Raleigh et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7120200 | Alamouti et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7145971 | Raleigh et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7203249 | Raleigh et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7386077 | Alamouti et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7587007 | Alamouti et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7643568 | Alamouti et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7916806 | Alamouti et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8351545 | Alamouti et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8355475 | Alamouti et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8731107 | Alamouti et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8767874 | Alamouti et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20040157646 | Raleigh et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050157810 | Raleigh et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20100091906 | Raleigh et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110170635 | Alamouti et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20140314174 | Alamouti et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2203903 | May 1996 | CA |
2252664 | Nov 1997 | CA |
2302289 | Mar 1998 | CA |
2276207 | Feb 2003 | CA |
29824760 UI | Jun 2002 | DE |
29824761 UI | Jun 2002 | DE |
29824762 UI | Jun 2002 | DE |
29824763 UI | Jun 2002 | DE |
29824765 | Jun 2002 | DE |
0392723 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0396101 | Nov 1990 | EP |
0631399 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0767546 | Apr 1997 | EP |
1016228 | Jul 2000 | EP |
2237706 | May 1991 | GB |
2280575 | Feb 1995 | GB |
2290010 | Dec 1995 | GB |
2311445 | Sep 1997 | GB |
63286027 | Nov 1988 | JP |
WO 9120142 | Dec 1991 | WO |
WO 9522214 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO 9724849 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9741670 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9809385 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9914871 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9923766 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 0011806 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0018056 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0049780 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0051265 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0119013 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0154305 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0156218 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0163826 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0169814 | Sep 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Alamouti et al., “Trellis-Coded Modulation and Transmit Diversity: Design Criteria and Performance Evaluation,” 0-7803-5106-1/98, pp. 703-708, 1998 IEEE. |
Alamouti, Siavash M., “A Simple Transmit Diversity Technique for Wireless Communications,” IEEE Journal on Select Areas in Communications, Oct. 1998, pp. 1451-1458, vol. 16, No. 8, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
Blanco, M.A. & Zdunek, K., “On the Optimization of Simple Switched Diversity Receivers,” 1978 IEEE Conference on Communications and Power, Montreal, Canada, pp. 114-117, (1978). |
Blanco, M.A. & Zdunek, K., “Performance and Optimization of Switched Diversity Systems for the Detection of Signals with Rayleigh Fading,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, Channels, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Nov. 1991, pp. 686-693. vol. 40, No. 4, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
Calderbank, A. et al., “Space-Time Codes for Wireless Communications,” 1997 IEEE, ISIT 1997, Jun. 29-Jul. 4, pp. 146, Ulm, Germany. |
Cavers, James K., “An Analysis of Pilot Symbol Assisted Modulation for Rayleigh Fading Channels,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Nov. 1991, pp. 686-693, vol. 40, No. 4, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, NY. |
European Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Mar. 12, 2010 in EP App. No. 06004662.0, 16 pages. |
Foschini, G.J. and Gans, M.J., “On Limits of Wireless Communications in a Fading Environment when Using Multiple Antennas,” Wireless Personal Communications , 1998, 6:311-335. |
Foschini, G.J., “Layered Space-Time Architecture for Wireless Communication in a Fading Environment when Using Multi-Element Antennae”, Bell Technical Labs Journal, pp. 41-59, (1996). |
Hinderling, J. et al., “CDMA Mobile Station Modem ASIC,” IEEE 1992 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference pp. 10.2.1-10.2.5, (1992). |
Hiroike et al., “Combined Effects of Phase Sweeping Transmitter Diversity and Channel Coding,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 41, No. 2, May 1992, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
Kerr, R. et al., “The CDMA Digital Cellular System: an ASIC Overview,” IEEE 1992 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference pp. 10.1.1-10.1.7, (1992). |
Naguib, A. F. et al., “Space-Time Coded Modulation for High Data Rate Wireless Communications,” 1997 IEEE, pp. 102-109, 0-7803-4198-8/97, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
Naguib, Ayman et al., “A Space-Time Coding Modem for High-Data-Rate Wireless Communications,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Oct. 1998, pp. 1459-1478, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 21, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/929,090, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 1, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/828,790, 11 pages. |
Pickholtz, R.L. et al., “Theory of Spread Spectrum Communications—A Tutorial,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, 30(5):855-884, (1982). |
Sampei, S. et al., “Rayleigh Fading Compensation Method for 16QAM in Digital Land Mobile Radio Channels,” Proceeding of the 1989 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, May 1989, pp. 640-646, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
Seshadri, N. et al., “Advanced Techniques for Modulation, Error Correction, Channel Equalization and Diversity,” AT&T Tech. Journal 47(4): 48-63, Jul. 1993. |
Seshadri, N. et al., “Space-Time Codes for Wireless Communication: Code Construction,” IEEE 47th Vehicular Technology Cont., Phoenix, pp. 637-641, May 1997. |
Seshadri, N. et al., “Two Signaling Schemes for Improving the Error Performance of FDD Transmission Systems Using Transmitter Antenna Diversity,” Proceeding of the 1993 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 43.sup.rd), May 1993, pp. 508-511, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
Tarokh, V. et al., “Space Time Codes for High Data Rate Wireless Communication: Performance Criteria in the Presence of Channel Estimation Errors, Mobility, and Multiple Paths”, IEEE Transactions on Communications 47(2):199-207, (1999). |
Tarokh, V., et al. “Space-Time Codes for High Data Rate Wireless Communication: Performance Criteria,” IEEE International Conference on Communications, Montreal, 1:299-303, Jun. 1997. |
Tarokh, Vahid et al., “Combined Array Processing and Space-Time Coding,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, May 1999, pp. 1121-1128, vol. 45, No. 4, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
Tarokh, Vahid et al., “Space-Time Codes for High Data Rate Wireless Communication: Performance Criterion and Code Construction,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Mar. 1998, pp. 744-765, vol. 44, No. 2, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
Ungerboeck, G., “Channel Coding with Multilevel/Phase Signals,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Jan. 1982, pp. 56-67, vol. IT-28, No. 1, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
Weerackody, V., “Diversity for the Direct-Sequence Spread Spectrum System Using Multiple Transmit Antennas,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications, May 23-26, 1993, Geneva, vol. 3, pp. 1775-1779. |
Winters, J.H., “The Diversity Gain of Transmit Diversity in Wireless Systems with Rayleigh Fading,” Proceeding of the 1994 ICC/SUPERCOMM, New Orleans, May 1994, vol. 2, pp. 1121-1125, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
Winters, J.H., Salz, J., Gitlin, R.D., “The Impact of Antenna Diversity on the Capacity of Wireless Communications Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 42, No. 2, Feb./Mar./Apr. 1994, pp. 1740-1751, IEEE Communications Society, New York, N.Y. |
Wittneben, A. “A New Bandwidth Efficient Transmit Antenna Modulation Diversity Scheme for Linear Digital Modulation,” Proceeding of the 1993 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IICC '93), May 1993, pp. 1630-1634, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
Wittneben, A. “Basestation modulation diversity for digital SIMULCAST,” Proceeding of the 1991 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, May 1991, pp. 848-853, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
Non-Final Office action mailed Oct. 1, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/319,428, 12 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140247896 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60063794 | Oct 1997 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09167422 | Oct 1998 | US |
Child | 10005095 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13691505 | Nov 2012 | US |
Child | 14280945 | US | |
Parent | 12650007 | Dec 2009 | US |
Child | 13691505 | US | |
Parent | 11018780 | Dec 2004 | US |
Child | 12650007 | US | |
Parent | 10334343 | Dec 2002 | US |
Child | 11018780 | US | |
Parent | 10005095 | Dec 2001 | US |
Child | 10334343 | US |