Low compression-force TPE weatherseals

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10676985
  • Patent Number
    10,676,985
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 23, 2018
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 9, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
A weatherseal has a stiffener and a foam profile. A first portion of the foam profile is connected to the stiffener. A second portion of the foam profile is joined to the first portion at a hinge. The first and second foam profile portions have inner surfaces facing substantially towards each other and outer surfaces facing substantially away from each other. The foam profile defines at least one continuous elongate lumen. A portion of the foam profile has a resin coating.
Description
INTRODUCTION

Hinged swing entry doors that are designed for use in residential housing applications typically have an interface between the door and door frame that consists of a gap. The gaps are frequently filled with weatherseals (also called weatherstripping, weather strips, seals, etc.) of various designs that are often mounted to base structures that are pressed into “kerf slots” in the frame. The weatherseals are designed to maintain an effective barrier against unwanted external environmental conditions, especially the infiltration of air and water. The weatherseals helps to separate the internal and external environments by preventing the passage of noise, dust, heat, and light from one side of the door unit to the other through the gap. Certain weatherseals also have application in sliding or hinged windows and sliding doors. For clarity, however, the technologies described herein will be made in the context of hinged doors.


Most residential houses have at least one swing entry door that has a frame, hinges, and a latching mechanism that holds the door in place against a seal in order to isolate the indoor environment from the outdoor environment by reducing air and water infiltration. The hinge, latch, and head represent one general sealing challenge to weatherseals designers while the sill poses another unique challenge. Frequently, the hinge, latch, and head seals require seventeen feet of weatherseals while the sill requires three feet.


Foam weatherseals currently marketed under trade names such as Q-Lon (available from Schlegel of Rochester, N.Y.) and LoxSeal (available from Loxcreen Company of West Columbia, S.C.) are variations of open cell urethane foam molded in polyethylene film. Q-Lon in particular displays excellent recovery, low operating force, and low cost. In addition, the open cell structure allows the air to quickly evacuate from the foam when the weatherseal is compressed, reducing operating forces to minimal operating performance while maintaining adequate sealing performance. EPDM (ethylene propylene diene monomer (M-class)) rubber foam door seal profiles with a dense EPDM base mounting stem are also available, e.g., from Lauren Manufacturing Company of New Philadelphia, Ohio. Various weatherseals can include fin-shaped appendages, hollow bulb weatherseals with single or multiple openings, sponge rubber bulbs, urethane foam molded in polyethylene (PE) liner; coextruded foam bulbs, magnet/bulb seals, etc.


SUMMARY

This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, is not intended to describe each disclosed embodiment or every implementation of the claimed subject matter, and is not intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter. Many other novel advantages, features, and relationships will become apparent as this description proceeds. The figures and the description that follow more particularly exemplify illustrative embodiments.


In one aspect, the technology relates to a weatherseal having: a hinged foam profile having an elongate axis; a stiffener secured to the hinged foam profile; and a resin coating substantially surrounding at least a portion of the hinged foam profile, wherein the hinged foam profile defines a continuous elongate lumen extending longitudinally along the elongate axis. In an embodiment, the hinged foam profile has a first leg secured to the stiffener and a second leg integral with the first foam leg, and wherein at least one of the first leg and the second leg defines the continuous elongate lumen. In another embodiment, the stiffener includes a first stiffener leg secured to the first leg, and wherein the second leg includes a second leg axis. In yet another embodiment, the second leg axis is disposed at an acute angle to the first stiffener leg.


In another aspect, the technology relates to a weatherseal having: a stiffener; a foam profile having: a first profile portion connected to the stiffener; and a second profile portion joined to the first profile portion at a hinge, wherein each of the first profile portion and the second foam profile portion has inner surfaces facing substantially towards each other and outer surfaces facing substantially away from each other, and wherein the foam profile defines at least one continuous elongate lumen; and a resin coating at least a portion of the foam profile. In an embodiment, when a bending force is applied to the second profile portion, the inner surfaces are moved into contact with each other. In another embodiment, when a compressive force is applied to the second profile portion, the at least one continuous elongate lumen substantially collapses. In yet another embodiment, when the bending force is applied, the foam profile deforms proximate the hinge. In still another embodiment, the at least one continuous lumen is defined by the first profile portion, and wherein the first profile portion has a substantially triangular profile cross section, and wherein the at least one continuous lumen has a substantially triangular lumen cross section nested in the substantially triangular profile cross section. In another embodiment, a second continuous lumen is further defined by the second profile portion.


In another aspect, the technology relates to a method of creating a seal between a door and a frame having mounted thereon a hinged foam weatherseal defining a plurality of substantially continuous lumens, the method including: moving a first leg of the foam weatherseal from a first position to a second position; and compressing the foam weatherseal so as to reduce at least partially a cross-sectional area of at least one of the plurality of substantially continuous lumens. In an embodiment, the first leg moves to the second position upon contact with the door. In another embodiment, the moving operation and the compressing operation are performed substantially simultaneously. In yet another embodiment, the moving operation is performed prior to the compressing operation. In still another embodiment, the method includes further compressing the foam weatherseal so as to reduce completely cross-sectional areas of all of the plurality of substantially continuous lumens. In another embodiment, when in the second position, facing surfaces of the foam weatherseal are in contact.


In another aspect, the technology relates to a weatherseal having: a hinged foamed TPE profile having a nominal height of about 0.650″, wherein the weatherseal includes a compression load deflection of less than about 1.25, when compressed to a thickness of about ⅜″ at a rate of about 1″/minute. In an embodiment, the foamed TPE profile defines a plurality of substantially continuous elongate lumens. In another embodiment, a substantially rigid base structure is connected to a first leg of the foamed TPE profile. In yet another embodiment, a resin coating at least a portion of the foamed TPE profile.


In another aspect, the technology relates to a weatherseal having: a hinged foam profile including: a first leg; a second leg extending from the first leg at an acute angle away from the first leg; and a hinge joining the first leg and the second leg, wherein the hinge is configured to buckle when the second leg is acted upon by a force, prior to substantial compression of the hinged foam profile, and wherein at least one of the first leg, the second leg, and the hinge define a substantially continuous elongate lumen. In an embodiment, the substantially continuous elongate lumen is configured to deform during buckling of the hinge. In another embodiment, the substantially continuous elongate lumen is defined by the first leg. In yet another embodiment, the first leg has a substantially triangular cross section and wherein the substantially continuous elongate lumen has a substantially triangular cross section nested in the first leg.


In another aspect, the technology relates to a weatherseal having: a stiffener; and a hinged foam profile having an exterior surface at least partially coated with a resin, the hinged foam profile having: a first portion having a first portion cross sectional area, wherein the first portion is connected to the stiffener and defines a first lumen having a first lumen cross sectional area similar to and nested within the first portion cross sectional area; and a second portion connected to the first portion and having a second portion cross sectional area, wherein the second portion defines a second lumen having a second lumen cross sectional area similar to and nested within the second portion cross sectional area. In an embodiment, the hinged foam profile is configured to bend at a hinge location between the first portion and the second portion. In another embodiment, bending of the hinge location reduces a separation distance between a surface of the first portion and a surface of the second portion. In yet another embodiment, the first lumen is configured to collapse upon application of a force to at least one of the first portion and the second portion. In still another embodiment, the bending and the collapsing occur substantially simultaneously. In an embodiment, the first lumen is substantially triangular.


In another embodiment of the above aspect, a first portion cross section and a first lumen cross section are defined by a substantially triangular-shape. In another embodiment, a second portion cross section and a second lumen cross section are both defined by a partially oval shape. In yet another embodiment, when the second portion is acted upon by an external force, the hinged foam profile bends and the first lumen at least partially deforms. In still another embodiment, when the second portion is acted upon by the external force, a surface of the second portion contacts a surface of the first portion.


In another aspect, the technology relates to a weatherseal having: a stiffener; and a hinged profile connected to the stiffener and having a first leg and a second leg, wherein the second leg defines a substantially continuous lumen therein. In an embodiment, the hinged profile further includes a hinge connecting the first leg to the second leg, wherein when the second leg is acted upon by a compressive force, the hinged profile is configured to buckle proximate the hinge prior to deformation of the substantially continuous lumen. In another embodiment, when acted upon by the compressive force, facing surfaces of the hinged profile are configured to contact prior to deformation of the substantially continuous lumen of the second leg. In yet another embodiment, the first leg defines a substantially continuous lumen, wherein the hinged profile is configured to buckle proximate the hinge and the substantially continuous lumen of the first leg.


In another aspect, the technology relates to a weatherseal having: a hinged foam profile having: a first portion; a second portion; and a hinged portion connecting the first portion and the second portion, wherein at least one of the first portion, the second portion, and the hinged portion defines a substantially continuous lumen. In an embodiment, the hinged portion is configured to bend upon application of a force to at least one of the first portion and the second portion. In another embodiment, bending of the hinged portion reduces a separation distance between a surface of the first portion and a surface of the second portion. In yet another embodiment, the substantially continuous lumen is configured to collapse upon application of a force to at least one of the first portion and the second portion. In still another embodiment, the bending and the collapsing occur substantially simultaneously.


In another embodiment of the above aspect, the substantially continuous lumen is substantially oblong. In an embodiment, the substantially continuous lumen is substantially triangular.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1A-1D depict examples of hinged profiles.



FIGS. 2A-2D depict examples of weatherseals in uncompressed and compressed states.



FIGS. 3A-3F depict examples of weatherseals in uncompressed and compressed states.



FIGS. 4A-4E depict examples of weatherseals.



FIGS. 5A-5D depict examples of weatherseals in uncompressed and compressed states.



FIGS. 6A-6D depict examples of weatherseals in uncompressed and compressed states.



FIGS. 7A and 7B depict an example of a weatherseal in uncompressed and compressed states.



FIGS. 8A-20 depict examples of weatherseals incorporating one or more of the technologies described herein.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Door Sealing Technology, Generally


Residential door weatherseals are most often compressed to about ⅜″ and are expected to seal effectively through the full compression range from the compressed thickness of about 5/16″ to about ½″ with the weatherseal extending to a full nominal thickness of about 0.650″. Many times, a door panel or frame has uneven surfaces and requires a seal that is compliant and uniform through the compression range to ensure a proper seal and closing force under all operating conditions. A typical residential door has about 17 feet of weatherseal in the gap at the side jambs and at the head. When closed, approximately 40% of the air that resides in a typical weatherseal is evacuated through the ends of the weatherseals in the amount of time it takes to close the door the final two or three inches, which can be as little as 0.05 seconds. Some weatherseals have more open cell structures than others. Weatherseals with generally open cell structures typically allow air to evacuate freely and rapidly through the ends of the weather strip, providing little or no resistance to the door's compressive force. Weatherseals with more closed cell structures resist, restrict, or even prevent rapid air movement through the cell matrix, causing instantaneous resistance to the door's compressive force upon closing. Some closed cell structures such as those found in some EPDM foams prevent all air from exiting through the cell walls, creating a short term deformation in the weatherseals shape until the internal and external gasses have attained pressure equilibrium. This occurs in materials that are semi-permeable to atmospheric gasses such as nitrogen, oxygen, and carbon dioxide.


It is desirable that a weatherseals have good performance in the following areas and be properly certified by AAMA, NWWDA, NFRC, and other voluntary accreditation bodies:


(A) Recovery/Resistance to Compression Set: The weatherseal should recover to a condition near its original uncompressed state after being compressed for a period of time.


(B) Weatherable/UV Resistant: The weatherseal should maintain dimensional and performance attributes after exposure to weather and UV light conditions.


(C) Water Absorption/Wicking: In cold climates, water absorption into the cell structure can cause problems when the water freezes and expands. The seal should allow air to pass freely through the seal matrix (not across the sealing surface), but should not allow water to penetrate the seal matrix for the risk of freezing.


(D) Compression Force: A weatherseal should provide the proper range of operating force, or CLD (Compression Load Deflection) while tolerating a range of forces from “slamming” of a door to the low operating force of a child or elderly person (so as to meet, e.g., ADA compliance). Too low a CLD will fail to prevent air and water penetration, while too high a CLD might prevent proper closing.


Types of Existing Weatherseals


Various materials may be used to manufacture weatherseals. These include those materials described above (e.g., open cell urethane foam molded in polyethylene film, EPDM), as well as thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) and thermoplastic vulcanisate (TPV).


Existing TPE Weatherseals


TPE/TPV weatherseal designs frequently include a solid foam core of thermoplastic elastomer foam surrounded by a generally impervious outer resin coating or skin material in order to provide protection from UV degradation and from physical damage. Such weatherseals are described for example in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,607,629; 5,393,796, and 5,192,586, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties. Recent designs utilize a variety of surface options including covering with polyethylene film, providing bare foam areas (e.g., without a resin coating or skin material), applying low friction coatings, leaving large surface areas with no coating to reduce force and increase flexibility, and incorporating silicone and other additives to provide surface lubrication and protection. Certain of these designs are described in the patents identified above, as well as U.S. Pat. No. 7,718,251, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The technology described herein can benefit from all of the aforementioned surface treatments in addition to yet-to-be developed methods and materials in order to further enhance the product's performance characteristics. Such TPE foam weatherseals are available under the brand name Foam-Tite® by Amesbury Group, Inc., of Amesbury, Mass.


Existing TPE foam is generally considered a substantially closed-cell foam cell structure due to its resistance to water penetration. Microscopic examination reveals that many of the cells actually have cell walls that opened to adjacent cells to various degrees. During cell formation, these small openings allow the blowing agent, gaseous water (steam), to escape the cell structure and upon cooling, be replaced with air until equilibrium is reached between the internal and external pressures. Due to the substantially closed-cell foam cell structure, TPE foam weatherseals provide excellent resistance to water infiltration, which makes them very desirable for use in exterior door weatherseals.


However, due to the closed-cell foam cell structure, TPE foam weatherseals offer higher than desirable CLD, which ultimately restricts their use in such applications. As solid TPE foam is compressed, air that is contained within the cells is forced through a network of microscopic interconnections between the cells in order for the foam to take on its compressed shape. These interconnections have been seen to occupy from less than about 10% to greater than about 30% of the cell wall surface, depending on such foam-forming factors as polymer melt viscosity, melt temperature, melt strength, nucleating additives, and other material and operating factors and conditions. In the case whereby the foam has been coated on the surface, the only evacuation route for the ambient air that fills the cells is via the ends of the profile. In some applications, such as windows, where operating cycles are relatively slow, the air that is internally captive within the cell structure has adequate time to evacuate the foam structure through the ends of the weatherstrip. In swing door applications, however, there is generally inadequate time to allow the air to properly evacuate the cell structure through the ends of the weatherseals as the door is closed, especially when it is “slammed” shut. This phenomenon generates a higher than acceptable operating force. In a truly closed cell structure wherein the gas that fills each cell remains completely captive, compression of the foam does not evacuate the gas and the compression rises significantly as a function of the internal gas pressure.


New TPE Weatherseals Utilizing Lumens, Generally


In order for TPE foam weatherseals to be accepted in the marketplace, they should have performance and costs similar to more common urethane seals, such as those described above. In that regard, a TPE foam weatherseal should look like a urethane weatherseal when in an uncompressed configuration. This gives the perception to consumers that the weatherseal will be able to bridge gaps between the door and the frame. Additionally, a weatherseal that returns to its original shape provides the impression of robustness that the weatherseal will not fail after repeated compressions. Similar performance is also desirable. The TPE foam weatherseal should resist abrasion, which can occur, e.g., if furniture is dragged along the weatherseal (during moving). The CLD of the weatherseal should be low enough that the door may be properly closed, without having to apply additional force thereto. If the CLD is too high, the door may not close properly, which can be particularly difficult for users with disabilities. However, the weatherseal should collapse with little applied force, since the weatherseal needs to retain sufficient resiliency across its length so as to bridge any gaps between the door and the frame. Additionally, to the extent water is drawn into the weatherstrip, either due to material used or configuration, free-flowing drainage of the water is desirable.


Recent developments in thermoplastic elastomer foaming technology have allowed the design and development of new profile shapes, configurations, and features that allow TPE foam to match or exceed the performance of urethane foam weatherseals. For example, the technologies as described herein include, e.g., weatherseals that incorporate one or more hollow channels or lumens in order to provide easier closing force. Other unique performance features and characteristics are also described herein.


In a door seal weatherseals with one or more continuous hollow tubular voids or lumens that extend the full length of the weatherstrip, the atmospheric air that is contained within the cell structure in its relaxed state can be voided from the weatherseals very rapidly upon compression, allowing the door to close with minimal force through the last inch or so of its closing distance. The cross sectional design of door weather seals is most effective when designed as a thin, angular, hinged profile, due to the requirement of compressing the seal over a broad dimensional range with little change in compression force. The lumen technologies described herein may also be utilized in round, triangular, rectangular, or square profiles. Weather seals with approximately equal thickness and width generally have a continuously increasing resistance to force when compressed while a hinged weatherseals has a more flattened resistance for force until an upper leaf of the profile makes contact with a lower leaf of the profile.


The addition of one or more of hollow channels or lumens has been incorporated into a variety of window and door seal foam profiles in order to reduce the closing force. The lumen is most commonly found in a profile both for design convenience and for the shape's universal acceptance and performance. The addition of a lumen can reduce the closing force by about 30% to about 50%, depending on the foam wall thickness and foam density. Further reductions can be achieved by shape design modifications. For example, a “loaf of bread” shape causes the foam walls to collapse inward upon compression, further reducing the force required to compress the profile.


The addition of multiple hollow channels in the foam profile provides the weatherseal designer a degree of freedom heretofore unachieved. It allows specific designs to have hinge points, secondary compression zones that compress with a second compression force after the primary compression has taken place (e.g., shock absorbers), features that enhance the compression set resistance, create product volume at a reduced cost, and features that allow the air to quickly evacuate the cell structure. The last item results from reinforcing walls that range from two to ten cells thick that are allowed to vent into multiple longitudinal chambers as the coated foam structure is compressed.


In a door seal application wherein a thin, hinged design is needed for the purpose of creating a constant closing force over a large sealing distance, one single tubular lumen at the hinge point may not be adequate to evacuate sufficient air that is captive in the cell structure to maintain a uniform compression load. In this case, multiple hollow lumens may be incorporated to evacuate more air from the cell structure. The technologies described herein utilize one to five hollow tubular lumens formed in a foam matrix in a specific shape configuration, extending the size and sealing capability without adding to the operating force. The multi-lumen configuration interacts with the hinge portion of a leaf-type door seal weatherseals to allow air to freely evacuate from the cell structure in a very rapid fashion upon rapid compression, allowing low operating force and excellent sealing performance through a range of gap sizes. This combination allows for children and individuals with disabilities to operate doors with irregularities and improper installation. It also provides adequate cushioning effect to allow the door to be slammed closed without significant structural damage.


Shapes


The weatherseals described herein may be formed in a number of general shapes, the features of which can be described, e.g., in relation to the frame of the door. FIGS. 1A-1D depict exemplary shapes of hinged profiles that can be manufactured in accordance with the teachings herein. FIG. 1A, for example, depicts a weatherseal 100a having a hinged profile 101a characterized generally by a U-shape, which is defined by a profile curve 102a. The profile curve 102a is determined by drawing a plurality of lines L substantially orthogonal to the jamb face JF. The profile curve 102a connects the midpoint M of each line L. Therefore, as depicted in FIG. 1A, this profile 101a is substantially U-shaped. The U-shaped hinged profile 101a has an upper leaf 104a, a hinge 106a, and a continuous outer surface 108a. The operation and location of these elements are described more specifically below. The lower leaf 110a is the portion of the profile 101a connected to a first arm 112a′ of a stiffener 112a. The stiffener 112a is the portion of the weatherseal 100a inserted into the kerf 114 of the doorframe 116a. In the uncompressed position, the upper leaf 104a is disposed at an acute angle ϕ to both the lower leaf 110a and the first arm 112a′ of the stiffener 112a.



FIG. 1B depicts a weatherseal 100b having a hinged profile 101b characterized generally by a V-shape, which is substantially defined by a sharp profile curve 102b, which is again determined as described above. The V-shaped hinged profile 100b has an upper leaf 104b, a hinge 106b, a continuous outer surface 108b. A lower leaf 110b tends to have a significantly different shape than the upper leaf 104b. Regardless, the lower leaf 110b is connected to a base structure or stiffener 112b, which is inserted into the kerf 114b of the doorframe 116b. In the uncompressed position, the upper leaf 104b is disposed at an acute angle ϕ to both the lower leaf 110b and the first arm 112b′ of the stiffener 112b.



FIG. 1C depicts a weatherseal 100c having a hinged profile 101c characterized generally by an S-shaped profile curve 102c, which is again determined as described above. The S-shaped hinged profile 100c has an upper leaf 104c, a hinge 106c, a continuous outer surface 108c. A lower leaf 110c is connected to a base structure or stiffener 112c, which is inserted into the kerf 114c of the doorframe 116c. In the uncompressed position, the upper leaf 104c is disposed at an acute angle ϕ to both the lower leaf 110c and the first arm 112c′ of the stiffener 112c.



FIG. 1D depicts a weatherseal 100d having a hinged profile 101d characterized generally by a profile curve 102d, which is again determined as described above. The profile curve 102d, in this case, includes a central linear section 103d due to the elongate neck 105d that is bounded by two hinges 106d. The hinged profile 100d includes an upper leaf 104d and a continuous outer surface 108d. A lower leaf 110d is connected to a base structure or stiffener 112d, which is inserted into the kerf 114d of the doorframe 116d. In the uncompressed position, the upper leaf 104d is disposed at an acute angle ϕ to both the lower leaf 110d and the first arm 112d′ of the stiffener 112d.



FIGS. 2A-2D depicts two examples of weatherseals 200a, 200b in uncompressed and compressed states and are used to describe, generally, stiffeners 202a, 202b, and lower leaves 204a, 204b of the profiles 206a, 206b. In FIGS. 2A-2B, the lower leaf 204a is connected to the stiffener 202a, which is inserted into the kerf 208a of the jamb 210a. The stiffener 204a may include one or more teeth 212a projecting therefrom that engage with an inner surface of the kerf 208a. The lower leaf 204a is connected to the stiffener 202a along substantially all of the width W thereof (as well as along a length thereof, extending transverse to the width W). The lower leaf 204a may be joined to the stiffener 202a with an adhesive or other connection element, or may be co-extruded therewith by joining the lower leaf 204a and the stiffener 202a along substantially the entire width W, a robust connection is formed. The lower leaf 204a terminates at the hinge H and, as such, defines two lumens 214a, 216a therein. The hinge H is the location of the profile 206a along which bending or folding takes place when the profile 206a is acted upon by an external force. As can be seen, lumen 214a, which is located distal from the hinge H maintains a substantially consistent outer profile as the profile 206a compresses to the condition depicted in FIG. 2B. This is because less deformation occurs to the portions of the lower leaf 204a distal from the hinge H. FIG. 2B corresponds to the door 222a being in a closed position and, in certain examples, inner surfaces 218a, 220a are not in contact in this position. Should inner surfaces 218a, 220a contact, however (e.g., if the door is out of plumb or the seal 200a is otherwise overcompressed), lumen 214a may collapse. Lumen 216a deforms significantly between the positions depicted in FIGS. 2A and 2B due to the proximity thereof to hinge H. As such, air is evacuated from the lumen 216a during the door closing operation, resulting in a reduced CLD of the weatherseal 200a. As described above, if the inner surfaces 218a, 220a contact, lumen 216a may completely collapse, depending on the degree of compression of the profile 206a.


In FIGS. 2C-2D, the lower leaf 204b is connected to the stiffener 202b, which is inserted into the kerf 208b of the jamb 210b. Certain elements depicted in FIGS. 2C-2D are described above with regard to FIGS. 2A-2B and are therefore not necessarily described further. The lower leaf 204b is connected to the stiffener 202b along only a portion of the width W thereof. In examples, the length of connection may be about two-thirds or one-half of the total width W. Other lengths of connection are contemplated. By joining the lower leaf 204b to only a portion of the width W, an overcompression volume V is formed (and is depicted generally as a dashed circle in FIG. 2D). The overcompression volume V provides a volume into which an upper leaf 222b of the profile 206b may be pushed if the door 222b is overcompressed. Since the upper leaf 222b may be moved into this overcompression volume V without significant contact with the lower leaf 204b, the CLD of the profile 206b remains low. The lower leaf 204b terminates at the hinge H and defines a single lumen 214b. The lumen 214b is nested within the lower leaf 204b, in that the lumen 214b is defined by walls that are disposed substantially equal distances d from the outer bounds of the lower leaf 204b. This can provide for predictable collapsing of the lumen 214b as the profile 206b is compressed. In contrast, a lumen that is substantially round, for example, would have walls that are not necessarily disposed substantially equal distances from the outer bounds of the lower leaf. As such, collapsing of such a lumen would be less predictable. The lumen 214b folds predictably inwards (at a bulge B) as the profile 206b folds at the hinge H. FIG. 2D corresponds to the door 222b being in a closed position and, in certain examples, inner surfaces 218b, 220b are not in contact in this position. Should the seal 200b be overcompressed, the upper leaf 222b will enter overcompression volume V. Even further overcompression would cause lumen 214b to collapse further, especially if the inner surfaces 218b, 220b come into contact.



FIGS. 3A-3F depicts three examples of weatherseals 300a, 300b, 300c in uncompressed and compressed states and are used to describe, generally, function of hinges 302a, 302b, 302c. In FIGS. 3A-3B, the hinge 302a separates an upper leaf U and a lower leaf L. The hinge 302a may be defined as a line separating the upper leaf U and the lower leaf L, along which the profile 304a folds or bends when acted upon by an external force (e.g., when compressed between a door 306a and a frame 308a. In the case of the weatherseal 300a of FIGS. 3A and 3B, the hinge 302a is solid, in that it is not crossed by a lumen, as that element is defined elsewhere herein. Solid hinges 302a generally display higher CLDs than hollow hinges (described below), but also display greater recovery than hollow hinges, since more material is present to force the profile 304a to return to the uncompressed position. Additionally, solid hinges 302a appear to allow for more uniform deformation of the profile 304a above and below the hinge 302a.


In FIGS. 3C-3D, the hinge 302b separates an upper leaf U and a lower leaf L. The hinge 302b may be a line separating the upper leaf U and the lower leaf L, along which the profile 304b folds or bends when acted upon by an external force (e.g., when compressed between a door 306b and a frame 308b). In the case of the weatherseal of FIGS. 3C and 3D, the hinge 302b is hollow, in that it is crossed by a lumen 314b, as that element is defined elsewhere herein. Hollow hinges 302b reduce the CLD, since there is less material to be folded at the hinge 302b. When acted upon by an external force, the inner portion of profile material at the hinge 302b (that is, the portion proximate the inner surfaces 310b, 312b) is under compression C. The outer portion (disposed on the opposite side of the lumen 314b from the inner portion) is under tension T. As such, forces generated by the material opposite these compression C and tension T forces bias the profile 304b towards the uncompressed position of FIG. 3C.


In FIGS. 3E-3F, two hinges 302c, 302c′ separates an upper leaf U and a lower leaf L. These hinges 302c, 302c′ are separated by a neck 314c that may allow the profile to obtain a longer reach R from the door frame 308c. More specifically, the upper hinge 302c separates the upper leaf U from the neck 314c, while the lower hinge 302c′ separates from neck 314c from the lower leaf L. Each leaf 302c, 302c′ folds or bends when acted upon by an external force (e.g., when compressed between a door 306c and a frame 308c). Typically, the upper hinge 302c folds first, although complete folding of the upper hinge 302c does not necessarily precede entirely folding of the lower hinge 302c′. Otherwise, folding of the two hinges 302c, 302c′ is substantially similar to the folding of a single solid hinge, such as depicted previously. Additionally, since the neck 314c has an axis A disposed substantially orthogonal to the frame 308c, the neck 314c helps increase the CLD as the profile 304c is forced into the compressed position of FIG. 3F (as well as an overcompressed position, if the door 306c is moved closer to the jamb 308c for any number of reasons).



FIGS. 4A-4E depict three examples of weatherseals 400a, 400b, 400c and are used to describe, generally, function of upper leaves 402a, 402b, 402c. In FIGS. 4A and 4B, the upper leaf 402a includes two lumens 404a, 404a′ separated by a rib 406a, which is manufactured from the profile 408a material. The upper leaf 402a is the first portion of the profile 408a that contacts the door 410a during closing operations. It is this contact that folds or bend the profile 408a proximate the hinge H. Use of two lumens 404a, 404a′ results in a higher CLD when compressed, due to the presence of the rib 406a therebetween. This rib 406a is disposed substantially orthogonal to the jamb 412a as the profile 408a is compressed, as in FIG. 4B. If the profile 408a is overcompressed, this orthogonal orientation of the rib 406a resists further compression and deformation, thus resulting in a higher CLD.


In FIGS. 4C and 4D, the weatherseal 400b has an upper leaf 402b that includes a lumen 404b. The upper leaf 402b is in the form of an outward-facing lobe (in that is faces away from the jamb 412b, towards the door 410b). This allows the upper leaf 402b to fold so as to fill the space S between the door 410b and the frame 412b. Additionally, the presence of the lumen 404b allows the upper leaf 402b to further conform to this space S. Should the upper leaf 402b not be pinched in the space S, however, the single lumen 404b otherwise reduces the CLD of the profile 408b.


Larger lumens can even further reduce the CLD. Such a lumen 404c is depicted in FIG. 4E. In this example, the upper leaf 402c includes a large lumen 404c that is substantially nested in the upper leaf 402c. A lumen nested within a leaf may, in one example, be defined as a lumen that is disposed within the leaf, so as to be spaced on all sides by a substantially equal distance d from the outer surface of the leaf. Upper leaves having enlarged nested lumens may more easily conform to irregular surfaces between a door and a door frame. Additionally, due to the large lumen, the CLD of the profile may be significantly reduced.



FIGS. 5A-5D depict two examples of weatherseals 500a, 500b and are used to describe, generally, function of ribs 502a, 504a, and 502b. In FIGS. 5A and 5B, upper rib 502a is disposed at an angle α to the face of the door 506a when the door 506a is in the closed position of FIG. 5B. A rib 502a having a smaller angle α to the door 506a provides less cushion to absorb impact, while a rib 502a having a larger angle α to the door 506a provides more cushion. Ribs 502a disposed generally orthogonal to the door 506a provide the greatest compression resistance and higher CLD. The rib 502a deforms as the profile 508a compresses. This places an inner portion 510a of an upper leaf 512a in compression C, while an upper portion 514a of the inner leaf 512a is in tension T. The lower rib 504a is disposed generally orthogonal to the jamb 516a and acts as a reinforcing structure to resist deformation. In FIGS. 5C and 5D, upper rib 502b is disposed at an angle α that is substantially orthogonal to the face of the door 506b when the door 506b is in the closed position of FIG. 5B. Such a rib 502b disposed generally orthogonal to the door 506b provides the greatest compression resistance and higher CLD. In general, the ribs 502a, 502b, 504a such as those depicted herein help maintain the shape of the profiles 508a, 508b. The further cushioning and impact absorption function of the ribs 502a, 502b, 504a occur when the profiles 508a, 508b are overcompressed (e.g., compressed past the closed positions of FIGS. 5B and 5D). As the inner facing surfaces 518a, 518b contact, the ribs 502a, 502b, 504a provide resistance to deformation.



FIGS. 6A-6D depict two examples of weatherseals 600a, 600b and are used to describe, generally, function of the outer resin coating or skin 602a, 602b. The skin 602a, 602b helps resist structural abuse and acts as a bumper against deformation without significantly increasing CLD. Profiles entirely lacking skin may be utilized, but abrasion resistance, water resistance, and UV resistance may be reduced, as these are primarily functions of the skin. FIGS. 6A and 6B depict a profile 604a having a thick skin portion 606a. The thick skin portion 606a located as depicted (e.g., proximate an outer curvature of the profile 604a) provides abrasion resistance against objects that may drag along the profile 604a, such as furniture and so on. The profile 604a also includes an unskinned portion 608a disposed on an inner curvature of the profile 604a. The unskinned portion 608a allows for increased profile 604a compression, since no skin is present to resist. The unskinned portion 608a is substantially aligned with a lumen 610a, which decreases inward compression I of the lumen 610a. Vertical compression V is increased, however, due to the unskinned portion 608a. FIGS. 6C and 6D depict a weatherseal 600b having skin 602b that includes a plurality of projections or fins 612a, 614b. The projections 612a, 614b can be formed integrally with or secured to the skin 602b and are utilized to seal gaps between surfaces, without increasing the overall size of the profile 604b.


The features and components described above in FIGS. 1A-6D can be incorporated into hinged weatherseals so as to achieve desired performance characteristics. In certain examples, lumens may be disposed in one or more of the upper leaf, the lower leaf, or the hinge, depending on the performance required or desired for a particular application. Multiple lumens in a single leaf are also contemplated and the ribs disposed therebetween can increase CLD (as compared to a leaf utilizing a single large lumen). The lumens may be defined by any shape, as required or desired for a particular application. Lumen shapes such as triangular, oval, ovid, bean, tear, etc., may be utilized. Lumen shapes may also be defined by their similarity to letters, such as U, C, D, O, and so on. As described above, particular shapes (e.g., triangular) may display particularly desirable performance, especially when in a configuration where the lumen is nested in a similarly shaped leaf.


The hinged weatherseals described herein may be utilized in standard entry doors, and as such, may be manufactured to particular sizes and dimensions widely accepted in the industry. FIGS. 7A and 7B depict exemplary dimensions of a weatherseal 700 for illustrative purposes. Individual lengths of weatherseals 700 may be manufactured in elongate lengths, e.g., cut from a single continuous seal. Regardless, each weatherseal defines an elongate axis that extends along a length thereof. As such, lumens defined by the weatherseal profile and similarly elongate along the weatherseal axis. One key feature of the weatherseal 700 is the uncompressed profile height P, which is the distance between a maximum extent of the upper leaf U and the door jamb J. Weatherseals such as those described herein can be manufactured with nominal profile heights P of about two-thirds of an inch to about one inch. More specific examples include heights of about 0.650″, about 0.730″, about 0.750″, about 0.825″, and about 0.928″. In such examples, the weatherseals may collapse to a height of about half of their uncompressed profile height P, without being subject to overcompression. It is desirable, however, that weatherseals manufactured in accordance with the disclosures herein be completely functional in a range of about one-eighth inch to about one-half inch. In examples, the cross-sectional area of the inner lumens L may decrease to between about 25% to about 50% of their original area when the weatherseal is in the closed position of FIG. 7B. A collapse of about 30% has also been discovered to be acceptable. Such collapsing allows air to be sufficiently evacuated from the lumens, so as to decrease CLD. Upon compression to an overcompressed state (e.g., beyond the compressed state of FIG. 7B), the lumens L may completely collapse, depending on the degree of compression.


Certain ratios of dimensions have been determined to be particularly desirable, as they have a positive effect on performance of the weatherseal 700. For example, a hinge distance D from the jamb J to the hinge H may be about 30% to about 50% of the total profile height P. Hinge distances D in this range have been discovered to result in fairly predictable bending or folding of the hinge H, while ensuring that the outer curvature C remains substantially even with a face of the jamb J (depicted by the dotted line in FIG. 7B) when in the compressed state. Additionally, profile width W should be sized to reduce the possibility of binding (where the upper leaf U is pinched between the door D and the adjacent frame F). This prevents the outer curvature C from being damaged or detracting from the aesthetics of the door panel DP. In other examples, the hinge distance D may be about 40% of the total profile height P. In a weatherseal having a profile height P of about 0.650″, this would result in a hinge distance D of about 0.260″. Ratios of a hinge thickness T to the profile height P are also relevant, especially in solid hinges, to allow for sufficient recovery. For example, a hinge thickness T of less than about 7% of the profile height H does not recover well, while a hinge thickness T of greater than about 23% displays too much rigidity and resists bending. A hinge thickness T of about 15% of the profile height has been determined to be desirable in certain examples. Wall thickness t (that is, the distance between a lumen L and an outer surface of the profile, as well as the distance between adjacent lumens L) also affects CLD. Depending on the materials used and the manufacturing processes, the wall thickness t may be about 3% of the total profile height P. Wall thickness t as thin as 0.020″ are contemplated and have displayed desirable results.


The weatherseals described herein may be manufactured in accordance with processes now known or developed in the future. Profiles may be cut from extruded, cooled pieces of foam material utilizing laser cutting processes, hot wire cutting processes, or other processes. The weatherseals may be cut from a rotary blade and formed into a final shape. For example, the weatherseal may be slit open, machined with a high speed cutter to form the lumen, coated to seal the exposed ends, then mounted to a substrate. Flexible adhesive systems can be used to assemble segments in a clamshell configuration by passing two elongated machined strips of foam over an adhesive lick roll and joining the strips together, thus forming the lumens. Other methods of manufacture include laminating multiple elongates subcomponent foam rod-shaped extrusions into a shape with a set of guides and rollers using a combination of heat and coating materials. Small foam beads or assembled tubes with cellular walls may be fused together in a continuous shape. The weatherstrip or portions thereof may be 3D printed with a modified Stratasys or similar printer. Lumens formed within the profiles may be cut by similar technologies, or may be machined or otherwise formed in the profiles utilizing, e.g., elongate drilling bits or other machining tools.


Desirable manufacturing processes also include extrusion and co-extrusion processes, such as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,607,629; 5,393,796, and 5,192,586, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. U.S. Pat. No. 7,718,251 also describes fabric-clad foam weatherseals, and such technologies may also be incorporated into the hinged, hollow profile technologies described herein. Electrical discharge machining (EDM) methods and design innovations have led to production of extrusion dies and back plates that may be used to produce complex profiles having one or more lumens, varied skin thicknesses, and other features. Very thin die openings with very delicate mandrel spider leg supports allow for unique foam shape control for very thin outer and inner reinforcing walls. Thin die openings also allow the foam to “knit” back together, creating a seamless finished product. The thin dies also allow a shape to maintain an inflated structure with an inner network of inner reinforcing walls or ribs, thus providing a process to design and produce, e.g., very large, complex multi-hollow foam profiles. Back-plates can be used that approximate the shape of the profile and guide the melt in a predetermined manner toward specific areas of the front plate.


The dies may be used to produce profiles having walls only three cells thick in certain locations. TPE foam cells vary from 0.010″-0.050″ diameter, depending on the polymer composition and the operating parameters. The cells are somewhat interactive with adjacent cells via random openings in their walls, allowing a restricted flow of air through the cell matrix. This allows air to be evacuated upon foam compression and to be returned to the cell matrix upon de-compression. The dies provide good shape control since the cells expand laterally, with minimal distortion, and allow for precise flexibility in areas designed to be hinges. Thin internal walls may need smaller cell structure with lower porosity in order to limit internal off-gassing while achieving low densities. Internal off-gassing inflates and distends lumens and can be controlled during the cooling process. Further development and control of foam cell size and density through process controls, base material changes, and additives may control rate of off-gassing during cell formation.


Materials utilized in the manufacture of the described weatherseals are identified in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,607,629; 5,393,796; and 5,192,586, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. Materials also include SANTOPRENE®, manufactured by the ExxonMobil Corporation; Sarlink manufactured by Teknor Apex Company; and Elastron Thermoplastic Elastomers, manufactured by Elastron Kimya A.S. Thermoset components may be applied during manufacture to improve compression set resistance. Lumens may also be formed in EPDM or urethane profiles.


A number of example weatherseals incorporating certain technologies described herein, are depicted below. In general, all of the following examples include a profile, a stiffener, an outer skin or resin coating, upper and lower leaves integral with each other (e.g., joined at a hinge), and one or more lumens in various locations. Further details regarding certain of these aspects for particular examples are described further below. A person of skill in the art, upon reading the above disclosure and following examples, will be able to produce further differing examples.


Example 1


FIGS. 8A-8B depict a first example of a weatherseal W1 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W1 includes a U-shaped profile curve PC1 and five lumens 1-5. Lumen 3 is disposed at the hinge H1, thus, the hinge H1 is a hollow type. The large curved lumen 3 adjacent to the hinge H1 reduces the CLD while the two pairs of lumens 1-2 (in an upper leaf U1) and 4-5 (in a lower leaf L1) further reduce the CLD while providing free flowing drainage, thus preventing accumulation of water. The single rib R1 within each leaf U1, L1 acts as a reinforcing structure to maintain product shape as well as a cushion to absorb impact.


Example 2


FIGS. 9A-9B depict a second example of a weatherseal W2 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W2 includes a U-shaped profile curve PC2 and three lumens 1-3. The weatherseal W2 is a similar hinge configuration to EXAMPLE 1, but also includes a single lumen 1, 3 in each leaf U2, L2. These lumens 1, 3, provide a lower CLD when the weatherseal W2 is overcompressed, as when a door is mounted out-of-plumb or hardware is mounted so as to compress the weatherseal W2 to less than a designed gap (e.g., ⅜″). While in the closed position in a door gap, the hinge H2 deforms such that the outer layer of foam remains under tension and the inner layer remains under compression, as described above for hollow hinges. As the weatherseal W2 is compressed, the lumen 2 is collapsed and the forces are distributed over a wide area, creating an acceptable balance between low CLD and good recovery.


Example 3


FIGS. 10A-10B depict a third example of a weatherseal W3 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W3 includes a U-shaped profile curve PC3 and four lumens 1-4. Rib R3 in the upper leaf U3 is disposed at an angle to the jamb J3 and door D3, which causes tension and compression forces, as described above, during closing operations and overcompression. Rib R3′, on the other hand, is substantially orthogonal to the jamb J3 and door D3, providing impact resistance during overcompression. Hinge H3 is solid, and the lumens 2, 3 disposed proximate thereto deform significantly during bending. Due to the angled rib R3, this causes significant deformation of lumen 1. The orthongal rib R3′ limits significant deformation of the lumen 4, until overcompression occurs.


Example 4


FIGS. 11A-11B depict a fourth example of a weatherseal W4 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W4 includes a V-shaped profile curve PC4 and three lumens 1-3. The weatherseal W4 includes a narrow, solid hinge H4, a triangular lower leaf L4, and an outer flexible skin S4 that mounts flush to the jamb J4. This allows the flexible skin S4 to seal tight against the jamb J4 thereby creating a positive seal. The solid hinge H4 provides a solid volume of foam to compress. This distributes the deformation forces above and below the hinge H4, providing a larger volume of foam compression while maintaining an acceptable balance between CLD and recovery. The triangular lumen 3 is nested within the lower leaf L4. As such, its sides are substantially parallel with, and disposed a consistent distance d from the outer surface of the lower leaf L4. Thus, the lumen 3 deforms in a unique manner, folding and buckling B as the weatherseal W4 is compressed into the compressed state of FIG. 11B. This buckling B enhances the low CLD. Additionally, the configuration of the lower leaf L4 also results in the presence of an overcompression volume V4, into which the upper leaf U4 may be moved, should overcompression occur.


Example 5


FIGS. 12A-12B depict a fifth example of a weatherseal W5 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W5 includes a profile curve PC5 defined by a central linear neck section N5 that is bounded by two hinges H5, H5′. Three lumens 1-3 are present. The two hinges H5, H5′ provide secondary relief when the door D5 is closed. On the hinge side of the door D5, the upper hinge H5 bends, after which the lower hinge H5′ becomes the active hinge point. On the lock side of the door D5, the upper hinge H5 becomes active as the door D5 closes in a straight downward fashion. An additional feature is a thickened, heavily reinforced outer skin S5 on the lower and side surfaces of the lower leaf L5. These surfaces S5 remain exposed to ambient conditions when the door D5 is closed and exposed to structural abuse when the door D5 is open, during such times as when furniture or other large objects are being moved through the doorway. The thicker skin surface S5 acts as a “bumper” while it does not significantly detract from the desired low CLD. Additionally, the configuration of the lower leaf L5 also results in the presence of an overcompression volume V5, into which the upper leaf U5 may be moved, should overcompression occur.


Example 6


FIGS. 13A-13B depict a sixth example of a weatherseal W6 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W6 includes a U-shaped profile curve PC6 and three lumens 1-3. The weatherseal W6 includes a small crescent shaped lumen 2 at the hinge H6 designed to minimize the CLD, accompanied by a relatively stiff upper leaf U6 that is designed to fold in a uniform manner, driving the majority of the folding and deformation into the lower leaf L6 of the weatherseal W6. The upper leaf U6 is fairly stiff because the lumen 1 is formed in only a small portion thereof. As such, the hinge H6 flexes more precisely, protecting and sealing the full gap from the frame F6 to the door D6. Additionally, the configuration of the lower leaf L6 also results in the presence of an overcompression volume V6, into which the upper leaf U6 may be moved, should overcompression occur.


Example 7


FIGS. 14A-14B depict a seventh example of a weatherseal W7 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W7 includes a V-shaped profile curve PC7 and two lumens 1-2. The weatherseal W7 relies upon a very narrow hinge H7 located at a distance D7 approximately 0.230″ above the jamb J7. As such, the hinge H7 is located at about 40% of the profile height P7. The weatherseal W7 includes a triangular lower leaf L7 having a nested triangular lumen 2 that accommodates the compression deformation caused by door DP7 closing. The upper lumen 1 provides relief from overcompression or in the event that the tip of the upper leaf U7 gets caught between the door DP7 and the door frame F7. An overcompression volume V7 is also present.


Example 8


FIGS. 14A-14B depict a eighth example of a weatherseal W8 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W8 is of the same design with many of the same features as weatherseal W7. As such, components shared with that of weatherseal W7 are not described further. Weatherseal W8, however, includes a sealing feature enhancement of two sealing fins F8, F8′. Sealing fin F8 is disposed at the tip of the upper leaf U8 and reduces or eliminates the penetration of air and water. Sealing fin F8′ is disposed at the point of entrance to the saw kerf K8 that is designed and constructed as a receiving channel for mounting the weatherseal W8. This sealing fin F8′ can limit infiltration of water into the kerf K8.


Example 9


FIGS. 16A-16B depict a ninth example of a weatherseal W9 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W9 includes a U-shaped profile curve PC9 and three lumens 1-3. The upper leaf U9 is in the form of an inward-facing bulbous lobe that extends into the overcompression volume V9 so as to effectively seal the space between the door D9 and the frame F9 in the closed position. It also provides an effective cushion in the event of over compression or door slamming. The hinge H9 is relatively solid and the lower leaf L9 is triangular with a nested triangle lumen 3.


Example 10


FIGS. 17A-17B depict a tenth example of a weatherseal W10 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W10 includes an S-shaped profile curve PC10, two lumens 1-2, and a solid hinge H10. The upper leaf U10 is in the form of an outwardly-facing bulb and includes a lumen 1 that allows the tip of the upper leaf U10 to be compressed between the door D10 and the frame F10. This creates a superior seal to prevent penetration of air and water through the door gap. The triangular lower leaf L10 allows ease of compression to less than 1 pound per foot at the required gap (e.g., ⅜″ nominal).


Example 11


FIGS. 18A-18B depict a eleventh example of a weatherseal W11 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W11 includes a U-shaped profile curve PC11, three lumens 1-3, and a hollow hinge H11. In order to reduce the CLD to 0.6 pounds per foot or less deflected to a ⅜″ gap, the weatherseal W11 features an uncoated portion UC11 at an interior curve of the weatherseal W11. This uncoated portion UC11 allows for ease of foam compression without the resistance of the flexible skin layer 511. In combination with the lumen 2 at the hinge H11, the profile is allowed to compress in two planes: inward to collapse the hollow and vertically above the jamb J11. This action reduces CLD and aids recovery.


Example 12


FIG. 19 depicts a twelfth example of a weatherseal W12 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in an uncompressed state. The weatherseal W12 includes a profile curve PC12 defined by a central linear neck section N12 that is bounded by two hinges H12, H12′. Two lumens 1-2 are present. The two hinges H12, H12′ provide secondary relief when the door is closed. On the hinge side of the door, the upper hinge H12 bends, after which the lower hinge H12′ becomes the active hinge point. On the lock side of the door, the upper hinge H12 becomes active as the door D12 closes in a straight downward fashion. The weatherseal W12 will provide extra protection for non-standard installations (e.g., a larger 0.750″ thick version of the seal) while maintaining the same low CLD at less than 1 pound at ⅜″ closed gap. An overcompression volume V12 is also present.


Example 13


FIG. 20 depicts a thirteenth example of a weatherseal W13 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in an uncompressed state. The weatherseal W13 includes a profile curve PC13 defined a central linear neck section N13 that is bounded by two hinges H13, H13′. Two lumens 1-2 are present. The two hinges H13, H13′ provide secondary relief when the door is closed. On the hinge side of the door, the upper hinge H13 bends, after which the lower hinge H13′ becomes the active hinge point. On the lock side of the door, the upper hinge H13 becomes active as the door closes in a straight downward fashion. The large size of lumen 1 forms a highly conformable upper leaf U13. As the weatherseal W13 is compressed, the upper leaf U13 rotates into the closed position, reducing the need for the upper leaf U13 tip to drag across the surface of the door D13 on the lock side of the door. An overcompression volume V13 is also present.


Select Test Data


As described above, it is desirable that the TPE foam weatherseals described herein display performance similar to urethane foam weatherseals. Table 1 depicts results of Door Closing Force tests and compares a number of different products. Q-lon is a urethane weatherseal manufactured by Schlegel of Rochester, N.Y. FOAM-TITE™ is a foam TPE weatherseal manufactured by Amesbury Group, Inc., of Amesbury, Mass. These two products were tested and the performance was compared to a foamed TPE weatherseal consistent with EXAMPLE 7, above. As can be seen, the EXAMPLE 7 product has a lower closing force than the Q-lon product and significantly lower closing force than the Foam-Tite product, which is manufactured from a like TPE material. As such, the EXAMPLE 7 product displays very desirable performance properties.









TABLE 1







Door Closing Force Test Comparison


Door Closing Force
















Door
Compared
Lab Test




Test
Nominal
Closing
to OEM
Lbs/Ft


Class
Specimen
Height
Force
Seal
CLD
Comment
















Q-Lon
QEBD-650
0.650
13.2
100%
1.23
Newly installed seals


Q-Lon
QEBD-650
0.650
9.5
72%
0.97
24 hours after








installation


TPE
Ex. 7
0.650
11.3
86%
1.08
Newly installed seals


TPE
Ex. 7
0.650
8.0
61%
0.92
24 hours after








installation


Foam-
12083
0.625
26.8
204%
3.40
Standard .625


Tite ™





production run


Foam-
12001
0.650
34.3
261%
4.70
Standard .650


Tite ™





production run









Table 2 depicts various performance data for a foamed TPE weatherseal consistent with EXAMPLE 7 above, as compared to two Q-lon products. The data includes weatherseal reach, force to close, air leakage, and water penetration, before and after 250,000 cycles. The data indicates that the EXAMPLE 7 product displays desirable force to close and reach, even after the test cycles are performed. The weatherseal also passes both the air leakage and water penetration tests, consistent with the Q-lon products.









TABLE 2







Performance Data Test Comparison


SINGLE OUTSWING DOOR (before and after 250k door cycles)









Weatherseal










Test
Units
U71 Q-Lon
EX. 7














Weatherseal
inch
before
0.636 +/− 0.012
0.654 +/− 0.018


reach

after
0.621 +/− 0.011
0.607 +/− 0.023


Force to
lbs
before
2.74 +/− 0.11
2.42 +/− 0.11


Latch

after
2.33 +/− 0.09
2.41 +/− 0.13


ASTM E283
scfm/ft2
before
Pass
Pass


Air Leakage

after
Pass
Pass


ASTM E547
design
before
Pass
Pass


Cyclic
pressure,
after
Pass
Pass


water
psf


penetration









Table 3 depicts door seal CLD test data for Q-lon products, a FOAM-TITE™ product, and a number of examples of the above described low-CLD foam TPE products (specifically, EXAMPLES 4, 5, 7, and 10). CLD is measured for a newly-manufactured product. CLD is measured by compressing a 1″ sample of the tested weatherstrip having a nominal height of 0.650″. The weatherstrip is compressed at a compression rate of 1″/minute until compression of ⅜″ is reached. The compression is performed with a CHATTILON force gauge. Under such test conditions, a CLD of less than about 1.25 lb/ft of weatherstrip would be desirable. As can be seen, the tested samples consistent with EXAMPLES 4, 5, 7, and 10 display lower CLDs than the comparably sized Q-lon products. The FOAM-TITE™ weatherstrip without lumens displays a very high CLD.









TABLE 3







Door Seal CLD Test Comparison











Compression



Sample
Force lb/ft







QEBD 650 U71 Q-Lon
1.33



Foam-Tite ™ 12083
2.79



EXAMPLE 4
1.03



EXAMPLE 5
1.05



EXAMPLE 7
1.12



EXAMPLE 10
1.08










While there have been described herein what are to be considered exemplary and preferred embodiments of the present technology, other modifications of the technology will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the teachings herein. The particular methods of manufacture and geometries disclosed herein are exemplary in nature and are not to be considered limiting. It is therefore desired to be secured in the appended claims all such modifications as fall within the spirit and scope of the technology. Accordingly, what is desired to be secured by Letters Patent is the technology as defined and differentiated in the following claims, and all equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A weatherseal comprising: a stiffener configured to be inserted into a kerf of a doorframe; anda foam profile comprising: a first profile portion connected to the stiffener;a second profile portion comprising a tip;an elongate section extending between the first profile portion and the second profile portion;two hinges bounding the elongate section, wherein a first hinge is formed between the first profile portion and one end of the elongate section and a second hinge is formed between the second profile portion and the other end of the elongate section, wherein the first hinge and the second hinge each define a portion of the foam profile that bends when the tip of the second profile portion is acted upon by an external force, and wherein each hinge has a first portion of foam material that is under compression and a second portion of foam material that is under tension during bending; andan inner surface and an opposite outer surface, wherein when the foam profile bends, the inner surface is under compression and the outer surface is under tension, and wherein when each hinge bends, the first portion of foam material is proximate the inner surface and the second portion of foam material is proximate the outer surface.
  • 2. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein when the foam profile is in an uncompressed position, the second profile portion is disposed at an acute angle to the first profile portion.
  • 3. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein upon application of the external force to the tip of the second profile portion, the second hinge bends prior to the first hinge.
  • 4. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein the stiffener comprises a first leg and a second leg, wherein the first leg is connected to the first profile portion.
  • 5. The weatherseal of claim 4, wherein the elongate section defines a longitudinal axis, and wherein the longitudinal axis is substantially orthogonal to the first leg of the stiffener.
  • 6. The weatherseal of claim 4, wherein the first profile portion is connected to the first leg along substantially all of a width of the first leg.
  • 7. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein the weatherseal further comprises a resin coating at least a portion of the outer surface.
  • 8. The weatherseal of claim 7, wherein the resin coating on the first profile portion is reinforced.
  • 9. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein the first profile portion has a cross-sectional shape different than a cross-sectional shape of the second profile portion.
  • 10. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first profile portion and the second profile portion defines a lumen.
  • 11. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein the first profile portion defines a first lumen, and wherein the second profile portion defines at least one second lumen.
  • 12. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein the foam profile comprises a closed-cell foam.
  • 13. The weatherseal of claim 12, wherein the closed-cell foam is thermoplastic elastomer (TPE).
  • 14. The weatherseal of claim 12, wherein the closed-cell foam is ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM).
  • 15. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein the foam profile comprises a compression load deflection of less than about 1.25 pounds per foot, when compressed to a thickness of about ⅜ inch at a rate of about 1 inch/minute.
  • 16. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein the stiffener is substantially rigid.
  • 17. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein when the foam profile is in a compressed position, an overcompression volume is defined between the first profile portion and the second profile portion.
  • 18. The weatherseal of claim 17, wherein when the foam profile is in an overcompressed position, the second profile portion is disposed at least partially within the overcompression volume.
  • 19. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein a lumen is defined within the elongate section.
  • 20. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein the weatherseal is configured to resist water penetration.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/043,298, filed Feb. 12, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,329,834, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/116,105, filed, Feb. 13, 2015, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (447)
Number Name Date Kind
343345 Sparks Jun 1886 A
874938 Cazin Dec 1907 A
1312034 Jones Aug 1919 A
1776073 Girard Sep 1930 A
1805145 Koops May 1931 A
1826297 Apple Oct 1931 A
1943818 Fantone Jan 1934 A
1960137 Brown May 1934 A
1960997 Halloran May 1934 A
2012625 Calcutt Aug 1935 A
2115368 Lustberg Apr 1938 A
2127413 Leguillon Aug 1938 A
2138699 Hinze Nov 1938 A
2175099 Abbott Oct 1939 A
2199067 Brandt Apr 1940 A
2200933 Nystrom May 1940 A
2218482 Reevely Oct 1940 A
2280105 Larmuth Apr 1942 A
2293252 Foster Aug 1942 A
2314168 Smith Mar 1943 A
2341450 Knaus Feb 1944 A
2354426 Briant Jul 1944 A
2366077 Wildy et al. Dec 1944 A
2386995 Wigal Oct 1945 A
2390780 Cornwell Dec 1945 A
2415721 Arner Feb 1947 A
2459120 Sparagen Jan 1949 A
2550520 Bennett Apr 1951 A
2555380 Stuart et al. Jun 1951 A
2602959 Fenlin Jul 1952 A
2623444 Maier et al. Dec 1952 A
2626426 Stahl Jan 1953 A
2657414 Miller et al. Nov 1953 A
2677633 Gross May 1954 A
2695421 Amundson et al. Nov 1954 A
2724877 Ramsay Nov 1955 A
2726632 Asbeck et al. Dec 1955 A
2748044 Seller May 1956 A
2754543 Loew Jul 1956 A
2757709 Crabbe et al. Aug 1956 A
2761417 Russell et al. Sep 1956 A
2761418 Russell Sep 1956 A
2761791 Russell Sep 1956 A
2778059 Henning et al. Jan 1957 A
2786622 Ross et al. Mar 1957 A
2797443 Carlson Jul 1957 A
2821497 Works et al. Jan 1958 A
2838813 Naramore Jun 1958 A
2839796 Quoss Jun 1958 A
2868159 Lit et al. Jan 1959 A
2880698 Olson Apr 1959 A
2911382 Barkhnff et al. Nov 1959 A
2874752 Brey Dec 1959 A
2933782 Cornell Apr 1960 A
2933784 Hooverson Apr 1960 A
2952240 Abbott Sep 1960 A
2977632 Bunch Apr 1961 A
3029779 Hornbostel Apr 1962 A
3032008 Land et al. May 1962 A
3032812 Van Riper May 1962 A
3041681 Goodwin Jun 1962 A
3041682 Alderfer et al. Jun 1962 A
3075653 Wales et al. Jan 1963 A
3081213 Chinn Mar 1963 A
3155540 Loeffler et al. Nov 1964 A
3155543 Marzocchi et al. Nov 1964 A
3167827 Alley et al. Feb 1965 A
3184808 Lyon May 1965 A
3184811 Bennett et al. May 1965 A
3206323 Miller et al. Sep 1965 A
3227577 Baessler et al. Jan 1966 A
3238573 Pease, Jr. Mar 1966 A
3251911 Hansen May 1966 A
3287477 Vesilind Nov 1966 A
3309439 Nonweiler Mar 1967 A
3350248 Demarest, Jr. et al. Oct 1967 A
3378956 Parks et al. Apr 1968 A
3385001 Bordner May 1968 A
3407253 Yoshimura et al. Oct 1968 A
3412709 Goyffon Nov 1968 A
3420208 Guthrie Jan 1969 A
3424130 Byrnes et al. Jan 1969 A
3448543 Multer Jun 1969 A
3450098 Williams Jun 1969 A
3469349 Multer Sep 1969 A
3471898 Krystof Oct 1969 A
3473512 Wood Oct 1969 A
3482006 Carlson Dec 1969 A
3531829 Skobel et al. Oct 1970 A
3535824 Kessler Oct 1970 A
3564773 Bonnaud Feb 1971 A
3595204 McIntyre Jul 1971 A
3596432 Straub et al. Aug 1971 A
3624964 Bordner et al. Dec 1971 A
3635620 Brown Jan 1972 A
3669062 Kallianides et al. Jun 1972 A
3672974 Tomlinson Jun 1972 A
3685206 Kessler Aug 1972 A
3700368 Wells Oct 1972 A
3700486 Veltri et al. Oct 1972 A
3733660 Kallianides et al. May 1973 A
3737490 Nicholson Jun 1973 A
3755873 Lansing Sep 1973 A
3762100 Kempel Oct 1973 A
3767454 Franke, Jr. et al. Oct 1973 A
3781390 Wells Dec 1973 A
3782870 Schippers Jan 1974 A
3789099 Garrett et al. Jan 1974 A
3811989 Hearn May 1974 A
3813199 Friesner May 1974 A
3814779 Wiley Jun 1974 A
3815637 Carrow Jun 1974 A
3827841 Kawai et al. Aug 1974 A
3836297 Weaver Sep 1974 A
3840384 Reade et al. Oct 1974 A
3841807 Weaver Oct 1974 A
3842564 Brown Oct 1974 A
3843475 Kent Oct 1974 A
3869325 Witzig Mar 1975 A
3874329 McLarty Apr 1975 A
3876487 Garrett et al. Apr 1975 A
3882817 Zink May 1975 A
3882819 Skeeters May 1975 A
3886898 Colegrove et al. Jun 1975 A
3888713 Alderfer Jun 1975 A
3903233 Dougherty Sep 1975 A
3907536 Achener Sep 1975 A
3918206 Dochnahl Nov 1975 A
3928521 Haren et al. Dec 1975 A
3937644 Bergeron et al. Feb 1976 A
3940467 Brachman Feb 1976 A
3941543 Buonanno Mar 1976 A
3944459 Skobel Mar 1976 A
3952552 Rozner Apr 1976 A
3956438 Schippers May 1976 A
3965931 Skobel Jun 1976 A
3981830 Takeuchi et al. Sep 1976 A
3999509 Lucas Dec 1976 A
4020194 McIntyre et al. Apr 1977 A
4049760 Lozach Sep 1977 A
4073408 Hartwig Feb 1978 A
4075851 Gardner Feb 1978 A
4077443 Coller et al. Mar 1978 A
4087223 Angioletti et al. May 1978 A
4096973 Checko Jun 1978 A
4104207 Pelikan et al. Aug 1978 A
4106437 Bartlett Aug 1978 A
4107260 Dougherty Aug 1978 A
4116159 Long Sep 1978 A
4117196 Mathias Sep 1978 A
4118166 Bartrum Oct 1978 A
4119325 Oakley et al. Oct 1978 A
4123100 Ellis Oct 1978 A
4124336 Johnson Nov 1978 A
4130535 Coran et al. Dec 1978 A
4144838 Ichiyanagi et al. Mar 1979 A
4156044 Mracek et al. May 1979 A
4156533 Close May 1979 A
4157149 Moen Jun 1979 A
4181647 Beach Jan 1980 A
4181780 Brenner et al. Jan 1980 A
4185416 Wilmes Jan 1980 A
4187068 Vassar Feb 1980 A
4189520 Gauchel Feb 1980 A
4200207 Akers et al. Apr 1980 A
4204496 Ikegami et al. May 1980 A
4204821 Gauchel et al. May 1980 A
4206011 Kanotz et al. Jun 1980 A
4208200 Claypoole et al. Jun 1980 A
4212787 Matsuda et al. Jul 1980 A
4222729 Ragazzini et al. Sep 1980 A
4226662 McCort Oct 1980 A
4238260 Washkewicz Dec 1980 A
4246299 Ohls Jan 1981 A
4258646 Kloczewski et al. Mar 1981 A
4259379 Britton et al. Mar 1981 A
4263348 Renegar Apr 1981 A
4274596 Howes Jun 1981 A
4274821 Kiemer Jun 1981 A
4277301 McIntyre et al. Jul 1981 A
4287684 McKann Sep 1981 A
4288482 Beck Sep 1981 A
4290249 Mass Sep 1981 A
4296062 Gauchel et al. Oct 1981 A
4299186 Pipkin et al. Nov 1981 A
4299187 Renegar Nov 1981 A
4305900 Cavalli Dec 1981 A
4305984 Boyce Dec 1981 A
4308352 Knaus Dec 1981 A
4309160 Poutanen et al. Jan 1982 A
4311628 Abdou-Sabet et al. Jan 1982 A
4312950 Snyder et al. Jan 1982 A
4312958 DiGiulio et al. Jan 1982 A
4313645 Cocco Feb 1982 A
4314834 Feenstra et al. Feb 1982 A
4321072 Dubos et al. Mar 1982 A
4323655 DiGiulio et al. Apr 1982 A
4328273 Yackiw May 1982 A
4341509 Harlow Jul 1982 A
4343845 Burden et al. Aug 1982 A
4344710 Johnson et al. Aug 1982 A
4347806 Argazzi et al. Sep 1982 A
4352892 Lohmar Oct 1982 A
4354989 Beach Oct 1982 A
4356216 Gailey et al. Oct 1982 A
4358497 Miska Nov 1982 A
4360395 Suzuki Nov 1982 A
4368224 Jackson Jan 1983 A
4370355 Niesse Jan 1983 A
4387123 Wollam et al. Jun 1983 A
4401612 Nehmey et al. Aug 1983 A
4401783 Kotian Aug 1983 A
4409165 Kim Oct 1983 A
4409365 Coran et al. Oct 1983 A
4411941 Azzola Oct 1983 A
4419309 Krutchen Dec 1983 A
4419958 Roba Dec 1983 A
4421867 Nojiri et al. Dec 1983 A
4438223 Hunter Mar 1984 A
4442788 Weis Apr 1984 A
4446179 Waugh May 1984 A
4454687 Baker Jun 1984 A
4458376 Sitko Jul 1984 A
4458450 Young et al. Jul 1984 A
4470941 Kurtz Sep 1984 A
4474830 Taylor Oct 1984 A
4476165 McIntyre Oct 1984 A
4477298 Bohannon, Jr. et al. Oct 1984 A
4510031 Matsusura et al. Apr 1985 A
4510884 Rosebrooks Apr 1985 A
4512945 Vigano Apr 1985 A
4517316 Mason May 1985 A
4526736 Searl et al. Jul 1985 A
4527825 Clouse Jul 1985 A
4530851 Shannon et al. Jul 1985 A
4532260 MacKeighen et al. Jul 1985 A
4535564 Yackiw Aug 1985 A
4537825 Yardley Aug 1985 A
4538380 Colliander Sep 1985 A
4557217 Zingg Dec 1985 A
4559095 Babbin Dec 1985 A
4562023 Pabst et al. Dec 1985 A
4563141 Zoller Jan 1986 A
4568507 Baxter Feb 1986 A
4569704 Bohannon, Jr. et al. Feb 1986 A
4581383 Park Apr 1986 A
4583485 Smith, Jr. Apr 1986 A
4585035 Piccoli Apr 1986 A
4587133 Shannon et al. May 1986 A
4589367 Renegar et al. May 1986 A
4593062 Puydak et al. Jun 1986 A
4600728 MacKeighen et al. Jul 1986 A
4601918 Zaman et al. Jul 1986 A
4604300 Keys et al. Aug 1986 A
4613521 Smith, Jr. Sep 1986 A
4616052 Habibullah Oct 1986 A
4622092 Bohannon, Jr. et al. Nov 1986 A
4623501 Ishizaki Nov 1986 A
4628639 Lownsdale Dec 1986 A
4644898 Jochem et al. Feb 1987 A
4649856 Shannon et al. Mar 1987 A
4651672 Sommer Mar 1987 A
4652475 Haney et al. Mar 1987 A
4654262 Alonso Mar 1987 A
4656785 Yackiw Apr 1987 A
4658548 Gerritsen Apr 1987 A
4659746 Topcik Apr 1987 A
4660147 Allen, Jr. et al. Apr 1987 A
4660338 Wagner Apr 1987 A
4668319 Piccoli May 1987 A
4676025 Mattscheck Jun 1987 A
4680317 Kuhnel et al. Jul 1987 A
4683166 Yuto et al. Jul 1987 A
4687137 Boger et al. Aug 1987 A
4688515 Rosebrooks Aug 1987 A
4694627 Omholt Sep 1987 A
4695236 Predohl et al. Sep 1987 A
4707172 Sottini et al. Nov 1987 A
4708351 Midooka et al. Nov 1987 A
4719039 Leonardi Jan 1988 A
4720936 Ellingson Jan 1988 A
4721591 Cheng-Shiang Jan 1988 A
4722818 Zoller Feb 1988 A
4725468 McIntyre Feb 1988 A
4729807 Hede et al. Mar 1988 A
4730416 Eames Mar 1988 A
4735169 Cawston et al. Apr 1988 A
4738810 Cheng-Shiang Apr 1988 A
4742646 Kehrli May 1988 A
4746477 Wecker et al. May 1988 A
4746545 McIntyre May 1988 A
4756271 Maier Jul 1988 A
4767183 Martin Aug 1988 A
4774109 Hadzimihalis et al. Sep 1988 A
4778367 Hilakos Oct 1988 A
4784902 Crompton Nov 1988 A
4805554 MacIntyre Feb 1989 A
4807397 Doan Feb 1989 A
4844004 Hadzimihalis et al. Jul 1989 A
4856975 Gearhart Aug 1989 A
4857668 Buonanno Aug 1989 A
4865676 Kimura et al. Sep 1989 A
4880674 Shimizu Nov 1989 A
4883690 Carter Nov 1989 A
4883691 McIntyre Nov 1989 A
4889669 Suzuki Dec 1989 A
4891249 McIntyre Jan 1990 A
4894105 Dyksterhouse et al. Jan 1990 A
4898760 Halberstadt et al. Feb 1990 A
4900490 Kozma Feb 1990 A
4907741 McIntyre Mar 1990 A
4916863 Burrous et al. Apr 1990 A
4918111 Tanaka et al. Apr 1990 A
4919739 Dyksterhouse et al. Apr 1990 A
4930257 Windgassen Jun 1990 A
4940557 Kimura Jul 1990 A
4943472 Dyksterhouse et al. Jul 1990 A
4968854 Benn, Sr. et al. Nov 1990 A
4984533 Takahashi et al. Jan 1991 A
5000988 Inoue et al. Mar 1991 A
5001865 Procton Mar 1991 A
5007203 Katrynuik Apr 1991 A
5009947 McManus et al. Apr 1991 A
5070111 Dumbauld Dec 1991 A
5075139 Crumbach et al. Dec 1991 A
5087488 Cakmakci Feb 1992 A
5093181 Sanchez Mar 1992 A
5094792 Baran Mar 1992 A
5128198 Dyksterhouse et al. Jul 1992 A
5143772 Iwasa Sep 1992 A
5156715 Starnes, Jr. Oct 1992 A
5160541 Fickling et al. Nov 1992 A
5169449 Raught Dec 1992 A
5186279 Chasteen et al. Feb 1993 A
5192586 Mertinooke et al. Mar 1993 A
5205890 Darsey et al. Apr 1993 A
5221346 Anderson Jun 1993 A
5237383 Parisi Aug 1993 A
5237917 Traut et al. Aug 1993 A
5251809 Drummond et al. Oct 1993 A
5266019 Farber Nov 1993 A
5271794 Jarrell et al. Dec 1993 A
5279087 Mann Jan 1994 A
5326592 Goewey et al. Jul 1994 A
5354378 Hauser et al. Oct 1994 A
5368644 Delgado Nov 1994 A
5382401 Pickett et al. Jan 1995 A
593796 Halberstadt et al. Feb 1995 A
5393796 Halberstadt et al. Feb 1995 A
5409733 Boger et al. Apr 1995 A
5411785 Cook May 1995 A
5415822 Cook May 1995 A
5418009 Raterman et al. May 1995 A
5421921 Gill et al. Jun 1995 A
5423935 Benecke et al. Jun 1995 A
5426894 Headrick Jun 1995 A
5429840 Raterman et al. Jul 1995 A
5438802 Johnson Aug 1995 A
5442825 Hahn Aug 1995 A
5449408 Koaizawa et al. Sep 1995 A
5451355 Boissonnat et al. Sep 1995 A
5458291 Brusko et al. Oct 1995 A
5474841 Matsuki et al. Dec 1995 A
5512601 Halberstadt et al. Apr 1996 A
5516545 Sandock May 1996 A
5524828 Raterman et al. Jun 1996 A
5525668 Olivier Jun 1996 A
5533675 Benecke et al. Jul 1996 A
5538380 Norton et al. Jul 1996 A
5538754 Sandock Jul 1996 A
5571326 Boissonnat et al. Nov 1996 A
5573638 Lennon et al. Nov 1996 A
5574118 Olivier Nov 1996 A
5586963 Lennon et al. Dec 1996 A
5588997 Lysson et al. Dec 1996 A
5601646 Gardner et al. Feb 1997 A
5607629 DeMello et al. Mar 1997 A
5636790 Brusko et al. Jun 1997 A
5654346 Halberstadt et al. Aug 1997 A
5656086 Hultzsch et al. Aug 1997 A
5665164 Milliman Sep 1997 A
5683036 Benecke et al. Nov 1997 A
5685911 Raterman et al. Nov 1997 A
5686165 Cook Nov 1997 A
5700845 Chung et al. Dec 1997 A
5728406 Halberstadt et al. Mar 1998 A
5728430 Sartor et al. Mar 1998 A
5728911 Hall Mar 1998 A
5733608 Kessel et al. Mar 1998 A
5759659 Sanocki Jun 1998 A
5788889 DeMello et al. Aug 1998 A
5795516 Cho et al. Aug 1998 A
5801209 Chung et al. Sep 1998 A
5802948 Andrisin, III et al. Sep 1998 A
5804284 Lennon et al. Sep 1998 A
5824400 Petrakis et al. Oct 1998 A
5843230 Potjer et al. Dec 1998 A
5843231 Spencer et al. Dec 1998 A
5851566 Potjer et al. Dec 1998 A
5875555 Andrisin, III et al. Mar 1999 A
5887392 Martin Mar 1999 A
5903004 Koshihara et al. May 1999 A
5907004 Dozeman et al. May 1999 A
5943825 Procton Aug 1999 A
5948858 Dorrestijn et al. Sep 1999 A
5962075 Sartor et al. Oct 1999 A
5968854 Akopian et al. Oct 1999 A
5995693 Yang et al. Nov 1999 A
6132809 Hynes et al. Oct 2000 A
6227634 Cittadini May 2001 B1
6514604 Gopalan et al. Feb 2003 B2
6623014 Martin Sep 2003 B1
6677020 Dron Jan 2004 B2
6776948 Arvidson et al. Aug 2004 B1
6883847 Willett Apr 2005 B2
6968649 Van Den Oord Nov 2005 B2
7017305 Ikuta Mar 2006 B2
7281354 Nishihara Oct 2007 B2
D571932 Van Camp et al. Jun 2008 S
7419555 Kaplo et al. Sep 2008 B2
7451714 Redfern Nov 2008 B1
7718251 Huntress et al. May 2010 B2
8225553 Redfern Jul 2012 B1
8225554 Nazaki Jul 2012 B2
8510996 Foster Aug 2013 B2
8679384 Foster Mar 2014 B2
9358716 Huntress et al. Jun 2016 B2
10265900 Huntress Apr 2019 B2
10329834 Mertinooke Jun 2019 B2
10370893 Hooper, Jr. Aug 2019 B2
20020113377 Mann Aug 2002 A1
20040074719 Loughney Apr 2004 A1
20040123532 Thill et al. Jul 2004 A1
20050102929 Hoffmann et al. May 2005 A1
20050186396 Okajima et al. Aug 2005 A1
20070113482 Dumke May 2007 A1
20070218270 Huntress et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080216411 Okajima Sep 2008 A1
20090313900 Foster Dec 2009 A1
20100136317 Huntress Jun 2010 A1
20140199512 Abramson Jul 2014 A1
20150240556 Allingson Aug 2015 A1
20160237737 Mertinooke Aug 2016 A1
20160237738 Mertinooke Aug 2016 A1
20160318226 Huntress Nov 2016 A1
20180154567 Huntress Jun 2018 A1
20180283089 Mertinooke Oct 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (39)
Number Date Country
852096 Sep 1970 CA
1177212 Nov 1984 CA
101249793 Aug 2008 CN
201521229 Jul 2010 CN
101952132 Jan 2011 CN
202157669 Mar 2012 CN
203719299 Jul 2014 CN
3503200 May 1986 DE
202004007829 Aug 2004 DE
102008046753 Mar 2010 DE
260674 Mar 1988 EP
996552 Jan 1999 EP
1222085 Apr 2001 EP
1227947 May 2001 EP
1590375 May 1970 FR
2200109 Apr 1974 FR
2310207 Dec 1980 FR
2572678 May 1986 FR
1160043 Jul 1969 GB
1305808 Feb 1973 GB
1409441 Oct 1975 GB
1467534 Mar 1977 GB
1507071 Apr 1978 GB
1545511 May 1979 GB
2067104 Jul 1981 GB
1595214 Aug 1981 GB
2132509 Jul 1984 GB
2136484 Sep 1984 GB
2146940 May 1985 GB
2146941 May 1985 GB
2179270 Mar 1987 GB
2226965 Jul 1990 GB
2355480 Apr 2001 GB
55-101438 Aug 1980 JP
58-168544 Oct 1983 JP
S59-54535 Mar 1984 JP
1101267 Apr 1989 JP
9858528 Dec 1998 WO
2005028231 Mar 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (37)
Entry
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application PCT/US2016/017801, dated May 2, 2016, 14 pages.
Amesbury Sealing Products, Foam-Tite Foam Seals Part# 12083, copyright 2013, located online at: http://www_amesbury.com/divisions/sealing-products/parts/4/160 on Jul. 19, 2017, 1 page.
Schlegel, Q-LON QEBD 650 Door Seal, Jun. 2008, 2 pages.
Schlegel, Profile Selection Guide Building Products Devision, Jun. 2008, 2 pages.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application PCT/US2016/017843, dated May 19, 2016, 12 pgs.
Foam Extrusion Technology for TP Elastomer Plastic Technology, Feb. 1987, pp. 23 and 25.
Bridge, Ralph, “Polymer Extrusion”, [online], May 5, 1997, pp. 1-8 [retrieved on Jun. 14, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet<URL: http://www.cngr.uconn.edu/cheg/polymer/ c256hnp.htm>.
Geelan, B.J., “Foaming Agents” Chemical & Additives, Modern Plastics Mid-October Encclopedia Issue, vol. 67, No. 11, pp. 184-188 (1990).
Han, C. D. et al., “Studies on Wire Coating Extrusion. I. The Rheology of Wire Coating Extrusion”, Polymer Engineering and Science, vol. 18, No. 13, pp. 1019-1029 (Oct. 1978).
Ligon Brothers Manufacturing Company, “Metal & Plastic Stampings, Plastic Extrusions, Metal & Plastic Assemblies”, 6 pgs, (1993).
Levy, Sidney, Handbook of Profile Coextrusion and Covering-Tooling and Systems Design, Construction, Operation, pp. 1-64, 1987.
Levy, Sidney, PE., “Handbook of Profile Extrusion-Tooling & System Design, Construction, Operation”, pp. 1-109 (1987).
Marketing information excerpt, Fenestration, p. 66 (Jan./ Feb. 2001).
Marketing information excerpt, Window & Door.TM., p. 52 (Jun./Jul. 2000).
Michaeli, Walter, “Extrusion Dies for Plastics and Rubber, 2nd rev. ed.”, pp. 2-11,157-159, 166-173, 178-181 (1992).
Monsanto Technical Correspondence, “Extrusion Foaming Technology for SANTOPRENE.RTM. Thermoplastic Rubber”, SANTOPRENE.RTM. Thermoplastic Rubber, 18 pages (May 10, 1988).
Monsanto Technical Note, “SANTOPRENE.RTM. Thermoplastic Rubber: The Vulcanized Rubber that Processes as a Thermoplastic” SANTOPRENE.RTM. Thermoplastic Rubber, 12 pages (1985).
Monsanto Technical Paper, “Extrusion Foaming Technology for SANTOPRENE.RTM. Thermoplastic Rubber (Revised)”, SANTOPRENE.RTM. Thermoplastic Rubber, 16 pages (May 13, 1987).
Monsanto, “Physical Properties”, SANTOPRENE.RTM. Thermoplastic Rubber, 20 pages (1987).
Monsanto, “SANTOPRENE.RTM. Thermoplastic Rubber: Glazing and Sealing Applications” SANTOPRENE.RTM. Thermoplastic Rubber, 12 pages (1987).
Omega Engineering Inc., Specification for “Low Flow Air Process and Liquid Circulation Heaters”, Online Catalogue: Electric Heater Products, [online], p. J-20 [retrieved on Jan. 31, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet:<URL: http://www.omega.com/toc.sub.--asp/frameset.html?book=Heaters&file=AHPF.s- ub.--HEATER>.
Omega Engineering Inc., Specification for the “‘T’ Type air Process Heaters for In-Line Air and Gas Heating”, Online Cataogue: Electric Heater Products, [online], pp. J-17, J-18 [retrieved on Jan. 31, 2003]. Retrieved from theInternet:<URL:http://www.omega.com/toc.sub.--asp/frameset.html?book-=Heaters&file=AHP.sub.--SERIES>.
Omega Engineering Inc., Specification for the “OMEGALUX AH-66136 Process Air Heater”, Online Catalogue: Electric Heater Products, [online], pp. J-15, J-16 [retrieved on Jan. 31, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet:<URL: http://www.omega.com/toc.sub.--asp/frameset.html?book= Heaters&file=AHCHEATER>.
Paulson Training Programs, Inc., “Extrusion Technology: Study Guide for Courses 2 & 3, Sessions 7-12”, 4 pages (1988).
Rogers, Tracy, “Weatherseals . . . Keeping Your Customers Warm and Dry,” Window and Door Fabricator TM, pp. 48, 50-51 (Oct./Nov. 1997).
Ultrafab, Inc., Advertisement—The UltraCell Bulb (1 pg.), shown at WIN-DOOR 2000, Toronto Congress Center, Toronto, ON (Nov. 15-17, 2000).
Ultrafab, Inc., Advertisement—Ultra Grip, USGlass, Metal and Glazing, 1 pg. (Mar. 2001).
Partial International Search Report for PCT/US07/006056 dated Aug. 27, 2007, 5 pp.
Amesbury Sealing Products, Foam-Tite Selection Guide, Jan. 2013, 1 page.
Benning, C.J., “Plastic Foams: The Physics and Chemistry of Product Performance and Process Technology”, vol. II: Structure Properties and Applications, 3 pages (1969).
Chart, “Resins and Compounds”, Modem Plastics Mid-October Encyclopedia Issue, pp. 424-425 (1991).
Eaton, C.J., “Foam Extrusion” Primary Process, Modem Plastics Mid-October Encyclopedia Issue, vol. 67, No. 11, pp. 291-292 (1990).
Grelle, P.F. et al., “Ignition Resistant Polystyrene, A New Look at an Old Friend: The Cost Effective Alternative for the 90's”, Proceedings from Structural Plastics '91 Conference and New Product Design Competition, pp. 145-155, (1991).
Levy, Sidney, P.E., “Plastic Extrusion Technology Handbook”, pp. 178-183 (1981).
Levy, Sidney, P.E., “Plastic Extrusion Technology Handbook”, pp. 189-201 (1989).
Walker, B.M. et al., Handbook of the Thermoplastic Elastomers—Second Edition, 4 pages (1988).
Schenectady International, SP-1077*, description and specifications, UM00040 Rev. 1 (Jan. 2001), 1 page.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180328103 A1 Nov 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62116105 Feb 2015 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15043298 Feb 2016 US
Child 16042030 US