Hinged swing entry doors that are designed for use in residential housing applications typically have an interface between the door and door frame that consists of a gap. The gaps are frequently filled with weatherseals (also called weatherstripping, weather strips, seals, etc.) of various designs that are often mounted to base structures that are pressed into “kerf slots” in the frame. The weatherseals are designed to maintain an effective barrier against unwanted external environmental conditions, especially the infiltration of air and water. The weatherseals helps to separate the internal and external environments by preventing the passage of noise, dust, heat, and light from one side of the door unit to the other through the gap. Certain weatherseals also have application in sliding or hinged windows and sliding doors. For clarity, however, the technologies described herein will be made in the context of hinged doors.
Most residential houses have at least one swing entry door that has a frame, hinges, and a latching mechanism that holds the door in place against a seal in order to isolate the indoor environment from the outdoor environment by reducing air and water infiltration. The hinge, latch, and head represent one general sealing challenge to weatherseals designers while the sill poses another unique challenge. Frequently, the hinge, latch, and head seals require seventeen feet of weatherseals while the sill requires three feet.
Foam weatherseals currently marketed under trade names such as Q-Lon (available from Schlegel of Rochester, N.Y.) and LoxSeal (available from Loxcreen Company of West Columbia, S.C.) are variations of open cell urethane foam molded in polyethylene film. Q-Lon in particular displays excellent recovery, low operating force, and low cost. In addition, the open cell structure allows the air to quickly evacuate from the foam when the weatherseal is compressed, reducing operating forces to minimal operating performance while maintaining adequate sealing performance. EPDM (ethylene propylene diene monomer (M-class)) rubber foam door seal profiles with a dense EPDM base mounting stem are also available, e.g., from Lauren Manufacturing Company of New Philadelphia, Ohio. Various weatherseals can include fin-shaped appendages, hollow bulb weatherseals with single or multiple openings, sponge rubber bulbs, urethane foam molded in polyethylene (PE) liner; coextruded foam bulbs, magnet/bulb seals, etc.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, is not intended to describe each disclosed embodiment or every implementation of the claimed subject matter, and is not intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter. Many other novel advantages, features, and relationships will become apparent as this description proceeds. The figures and the description that follow more particularly exemplify illustrative embodiments.
In one aspect, the technology relates to a weatherseal having: a hinged foam profile having an elongate axis; a stiffener secured to the hinged foam profile; and a resin coating substantially surrounding at least a portion of the hinged foam profile, wherein the hinged foam profile defines a continuous elongate lumen extending longitudinally along the elongate axis. In an embodiment, the hinged foam profile has a first leg secured to the stiffener and a second leg integral with the first foam leg, and wherein at least one of the first leg and the second leg defines the continuous elongate lumen. In another embodiment, the stiffener includes a first stiffener leg secured to the first leg, and wherein the second leg includes a second leg axis. In yet another embodiment, the second leg axis is disposed at an acute angle to the first stiffener leg.
In another aspect, the technology relates to a weatherseal having: a stiffener; a foam profile having: a first profile portion connected to the stiffener; and a second profile portion joined to the first profile portion at a hinge, wherein each of the first profile portion and the second foam profile portion has inner surfaces facing substantially towards each other and outer surfaces facing substantially away from each other, and wherein the foam profile defines at least one continuous elongate lumen; and a resin coating at least a portion of the foam profile. In an embodiment, when a bending force is applied to the second profile portion, the inner surfaces are moved into contact with each other. In another embodiment, when a compressive force is applied to the second profile portion, the at least one continuous elongate lumen substantially collapses. In yet another embodiment, when the bending force is applied, the foam profile deforms proximate the hinge. In still another embodiment, the at least one continuous lumen is defined by the first profile portion, and wherein the first profile portion has a substantially triangular profile cross section, and wherein the at least one continuous lumen has a substantially triangular lumen cross section nested in the substantially triangular profile cross section. In another embodiment, a second continuous lumen is further defined by the second profile portion.
In another aspect, the technology relates to a method of creating a seal between a door and a frame having mounted thereon a hinged foam weatherseal defining a plurality of substantially continuous lumens, the method including: moving a first leg of the foam weatherseal from a first position to a second position; and compressing the foam weatherseal so as to reduce at least partially a cross-sectional area of at least one of the plurality of substantially continuous lumens. In an embodiment, the first leg moves to the second position upon contact with the door. In another embodiment, the moving operation and the compressing operation are performed substantially simultaneously. In yet another embodiment, the moving operation is performed prior to the compressing operation. In still another embodiment, the method includes further compressing the foam weatherseal so as to reduce completely cross-sectional areas of all of the plurality of substantially continuous lumens. In another embodiment, when in the second position, facing surfaces of the foam weatherseal are in contact.
In another aspect, the technology relates to a weatherseal having: a hinged foamed TPE profile having a nominal height of about 0.650″, wherein the weatherseal includes a compression load deflection of less than about 1.25, when compressed to a thickness of about ⅜″ at a rate of about 1″/minute. In an embodiment, the foamed TPE profile defines a plurality of substantially continuous elongate lumens. In another embodiment, a substantially rigid base structure is connected to a first leg of the foamed TPE profile. In yet another embodiment, a resin coating at least a portion of the foamed TPE profile.
In another aspect, the technology relates to a weatherseal having: a hinged foam profile including: a first leg; a second leg extending from the first leg at an acute angle away from the first leg; and a hinge joining the first leg and the second leg, wherein the hinge is configured to buckle when the second leg is acted upon by a force, prior to substantial compression of the hinged foam profile, and wherein at least one of the first leg, the second leg, and the hinge define a substantially continuous elongate lumen. In an embodiment, the substantially continuous elongate lumen is configured to deform during buckling of the hinge. In another embodiment, the substantially continuous elongate lumen is defined by the first leg. In yet another embodiment, the first leg has a substantially triangular cross section and wherein the substantially continuous elongate lumen has a substantially triangular cross section nested in the first leg.
In another aspect, the technology relates to a weatherseal having: a stiffener; and a hinged foam profile having an exterior surface at least partially coated with a resin, the hinged foam profile having: a first portion having a first portion cross sectional area, wherein the first portion is connected to the stiffener and defines a first lumen having a first lumen cross sectional area similar to and nested within the first portion cross sectional area; and a second portion connected to the first portion and having a second portion cross sectional area, wherein the second portion defines a second lumen having a second lumen cross sectional area similar to and nested within the second portion cross sectional area. In an embodiment, the hinged foam profile is configured to bend at a hinge location between the first portion and the second portion. In another embodiment, bending of the hinge location reduces a separation distance between a surface of the first portion and a surface of the second portion. In yet another embodiment, the first lumen is configured to collapse upon application of a force to at least one of the first portion and the second portion. In still another embodiment, the bending and the collapsing occur substantially simultaneously. In an embodiment, the first lumen is substantially triangular.
In another embodiment of the above aspect, a first portion cross section and a first lumen cross section are defined by a substantially triangular-shape. In another embodiment, a second portion cross section and a second lumen cross section are both defined by a partially oval shape. In yet another embodiment, when the second portion is acted upon by an external force, the hinged foam profile bends and the first lumen at least partially deforms. In still another embodiment, when the second portion is acted upon by the external force, a surface of the second portion contacts a surface of the first portion.
In another aspect, the technology relates to a weatherseal having: a stiffener; and a hinged profile connected to the stiffener and having a first leg and a second leg, wherein the second leg defines a substantially continuous lumen therein. In an embodiment, the hinged profile further includes a hinge connecting the first leg to the second leg, wherein when the second leg is acted upon by a compressive force, the hinged profile is configured to buckle proximate the hinge prior to deformation of the substantially continuous lumen. In another embodiment, when acted upon by the compressive force, facing surfaces of the hinged profile are configured to contact prior to deformation of the substantially continuous lumen of the second leg. In yet another embodiment, the first leg defines a substantially continuous lumen, wherein the hinged profile is configured to buckle proximate the hinge and the substantially continuous lumen of the first leg.
In another aspect, the technology relates to a weatherseal having: a hinged foam profile having: a first portion; a second portion; and a hinged portion connecting the first portion and the second portion, wherein at least one of the first portion, the second portion, and the hinged portion defines a substantially continuous lumen. In an embodiment, the hinged portion is configured to bend upon application of a force to at least one of the first portion and the second portion. In another embodiment, bending of the hinged portion reduces a separation distance between a surface of the first portion and a surface of the second portion. In yet another embodiment, the substantially continuous lumen is configured to collapse upon application of a force to at least one of the first portion and the second portion. In still another embodiment, the bending and the collapsing occur substantially simultaneously.
In another embodiment of the above aspect, the substantially continuous lumen is substantially oblong. In an embodiment, the substantially continuous lumen is substantially triangular.
Door Sealing Technology, Generally
Residential door weatherseals are most often compressed to about ⅜″ and are expected to seal effectively through the full compression range from the compressed thickness of about 5/16″ to about ½″ with the weatherseal extending to a full nominal thickness of about 0.650″. Many times, a door panel or frame has uneven surfaces and requires a seal that is compliant and uniform through the compression range to ensure a proper seal and closing force under all operating conditions. A typical residential door has about 17 feet of weatherseal in the gap at the side jambs and at the head. When closed, approximately 40% of the air that resides in a typical weatherseal is evacuated through the ends of the weatherseals in the amount of time it takes to close the door the final two or three inches, which can be as little as 0.05 seconds. Some weatherseals have more open cell structures than others. Weatherseals with generally open cell structures typically allow air to evacuate freely and rapidly through the ends of the weather strip, providing little or no resistance to the door's compressive force. Weatherseals with more closed cell structures resist, restrict, or even prevent rapid air movement through the cell matrix, causing instantaneous resistance to the door's compressive force upon closing. Some closed cell structures such as those found in some EPDM foams prevent all air from exiting through the cell walls, creating a short term deformation in the weatherseals shape until the internal and external gasses have attained pressure equilibrium. This occurs in materials that are semi-permeable to atmospheric gasses such as nitrogen, oxygen, and carbon dioxide.
It is desirable that a weatherseals have good performance in the following areas and be properly certified by AAMA, NWWDA, NFRC, and other voluntary accreditation bodies:
(A) Recovery/Resistance to Compression Set: The weatherseal should recover to a condition near its original uncompressed state after being compressed for a period of time.
(B) Weatherable/UV Resistant: The weatherseal should maintain dimensional and performance attributes after exposure to weather and UV light conditions.
(C) Water Absorption/Wicking: In cold climates, water absorption into the cell structure can cause problems when the water freezes and expands. The seal should allow air to pass freely through the seal matrix (not across the sealing surface), but should not allow water to penetrate the seal matrix for the risk of freezing.
(D) Compression Force: A weatherseal should provide the proper range of operating force, or CLD (Compression Load Deflection) while tolerating a range of forces from “slamming” of a door to the low operating force of a child or elderly person (so as to meet, e.g., ADA compliance). Too low a CLD will fail to prevent air and water penetration, while too high a CLD might prevent proper closing.
Types of Existing Weatherseals
Various materials may be used to manufacture weatherseals. These include those materials described above (e.g., open cell urethane foam molded in polyethylene film, EPDM), as well as thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) and thermoplastic vulcanisate (TPV).
Existing TPE Weatherseals
TPE/TPV weatherseal designs frequently include a solid foam core of thermoplastic elastomer foam surrounded by a generally impervious outer resin coating or skin material in order to provide protection from UV degradation and from physical damage. Such weatherseals are described for example in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,607,629; 5,393,796, and 5,192,586, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties. Recent designs utilize a variety of surface options including covering with polyethylene film, providing bare foam areas (e.g., without a resin coating or skin material), applying low friction coatings, leaving large surface areas with no coating to reduce force and increase flexibility, and incorporating silicone and other additives to provide surface lubrication and protection. Certain of these designs are described in the patents identified above, as well as U.S. Pat. No. 7,718,251, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The technology described herein can benefit from all of the aforementioned surface treatments in addition to yet-to-be developed methods and materials in order to further enhance the product's performance characteristics. Such TPE foam weatherseals are available under the brand name Foam-Tite® by Amesbury Group, Inc., of Amesbury, Mass.
Existing TPE foam is generally considered a substantially closed-cell foam cell structure due to its resistance to water penetration. Microscopic examination reveals that many of the cells actually have cell walls that opened to adjacent cells to various degrees. During cell formation, these small openings allow the blowing agent, gaseous water (steam), to escape the cell structure and upon cooling, be replaced with air until equilibrium is reached between the internal and external pressures. Due to the substantially closed-cell foam cell structure, TPE foam weatherseals provide excellent resistance to water infiltration, which makes them very desirable for use in exterior door weatherseals.
However, due to the closed-cell foam cell structure, TPE foam weatherseals offer higher than desirable CLD, which ultimately restricts their use in such applications. As solid TPE foam is compressed, air that is contained within the cells is forced through a network of microscopic interconnections between the cells in order for the foam to take on its compressed shape. These interconnections have been seen to occupy from less than about 10% to greater than about 30% of the cell wall surface, depending on such foam-forming factors as polymer melt viscosity, melt temperature, melt strength, nucleating additives, and other material and operating factors and conditions. In the case whereby the foam has been coated on the surface, the only evacuation route for the ambient air that fills the cells is via the ends of the profile. In some applications, such as windows, where operating cycles are relatively slow, the air that is internally captive within the cell structure has adequate time to evacuate the foam structure through the ends of the weatherstrip. In swing door applications, however, there is generally inadequate time to allow the air to properly evacuate the cell structure through the ends of the weatherseals as the door is closed, especially when it is “slammed” shut. This phenomenon generates a higher than acceptable operating force. In a truly closed cell structure wherein the gas that fills each cell remains completely captive, compression of the foam does not evacuate the gas and the compression rises significantly as a function of the internal gas pressure.
New TPE Weatherseals Utilizing Lumens, Generally
In order for TPE foam weatherseals to be accepted in the marketplace, they should have performance and costs similar to more common urethane seals, such as those described above. In that regard, a TPE foam weatherseal should look like a urethane weatherseal when in an uncompressed configuration. This gives the perception to consumers that the weatherseal will be able to bridge gaps between the door and the frame. Additionally, a weatherseal that returns to its original shape provides the impression of robustness that the weatherseal will not fail after repeated compressions. Similar performance is also desirable. The TPE foam weatherseal should resist abrasion, which can occur, e.g., if furniture is dragged along the weatherseal (during moving). The CLD of the weatherseal should be low enough that the door may be properly closed, without having to apply additional force thereto. If the CLD is too high, the door may not close properly, which can be particularly difficult for users with disabilities. However, the weatherseal should collapse with little applied force, since the weatherseal needs to retain sufficient resiliency across its length so as to bridge any gaps between the door and the frame. Additionally, to the extent water is drawn into the weatherstrip, either due to material used or configuration, free-flowing drainage of the water is desirable.
Recent developments in thermoplastic elastomer foaming technology have allowed the design and development of new profile shapes, configurations, and features that allow TPE foam to match or exceed the performance of urethane foam weatherseals. For example, the technologies as described herein include, e.g., weatherseals that incorporate one or more hollow channels or lumens in order to provide easier closing force. Other unique performance features and characteristics are also described herein.
In a door seal weatherseals with one or more continuous hollow tubular voids or lumens that extend the full length of the weatherstrip, the atmospheric air that is contained within the cell structure in its relaxed state can be voided from the weatherseals very rapidly upon compression, allowing the door to close with minimal force through the last inch or so of its closing distance. The cross sectional design of door weather seals is most effective when designed as a thin, angular, hinged profile, due to the requirement of compressing the seal over a broad dimensional range with little change in compression force. The lumen technologies described herein may also be utilized in round, triangular, rectangular, or square profiles. Weather seals with approximately equal thickness and width generally have a continuously increasing resistance to force when compressed while a hinged weatherseals has a more flattened resistance for force until an upper leaf of the profile makes contact with a lower leaf of the profile.
The addition of one or more of hollow channels or lumens has been incorporated into a variety of window and door seal foam profiles in order to reduce the closing force. The lumen is most commonly found in a profile both for design convenience and for the shape's universal acceptance and performance. The addition of a lumen can reduce the closing force by about 30% to about 50%, depending on the foam wall thickness and foam density. Further reductions can be achieved by shape design modifications. For example, a “loaf of bread” shape causes the foam walls to collapse inward upon compression, further reducing the force required to compress the profile.
The addition of multiple hollow channels in the foam profile provides the weatherseal designer a degree of freedom heretofore unachieved. It allows specific designs to have hinge points, secondary compression zones that compress with a second compression force after the primary compression has taken place (e.g., shock absorbers), features that enhance the compression set resistance, create product volume at a reduced cost, and features that allow the air to quickly evacuate the cell structure. The last item results from reinforcing walls that range from two to ten cells thick that are allowed to vent into multiple longitudinal chambers as the coated foam structure is compressed.
In a door seal application wherein a thin, hinged design is needed for the purpose of creating a constant closing force over a large sealing distance, one single tubular lumen at the hinge point may not be adequate to evacuate sufficient air that is captive in the cell structure to maintain a uniform compression load. In this case, multiple hollow lumens may be incorporated to evacuate more air from the cell structure. The technologies described herein utilize one to five hollow tubular lumens formed in a foam matrix in a specific shape configuration, extending the size and sealing capability without adding to the operating force. The multi-lumen configuration interacts with the hinge portion of a leaf-type door seal weatherseals to allow air to freely evacuate from the cell structure in a very rapid fashion upon rapid compression, allowing low operating force and excellent sealing performance through a range of gap sizes. This combination allows for children and individuals with disabilities to operate doors with irregularities and improper installation. It also provides adequate cushioning effect to allow the door to be slammed closed without significant structural damage.
Shapes
The weatherseals described herein may be formed in a number of general shapes, the features of which can be described, e.g., in relation to the frame of the door.
In
In
In
In
Larger lumens can even further reduce the CLD. Such a lumen 404c is depicted in
The features and components described above in
The hinged weatherseals described herein may be utilized in standard entry doors, and as such, may be manufactured to particular sizes and dimensions widely accepted in the industry.
Certain ratios of dimensions have been determined to be particularly desirable, as they have a positive effect on performance of the weatherseal 700. For example, a hinge distance D from the jamb J to the hinge H may be about 30% to about 50% of the total profile height P. Hinge distances D in this range have been discovered to result in fairly predictable bending or folding of the hinge H, while ensuring that the outer curvature C remains substantially even with a face of the jamb J (depicted by the dotted line in
The weatherseals described herein may be manufactured in accordance with processes now known or developed in the future. Profiles may be cut from extruded, cooled pieces of foam material utilizing laser cutting processes, hot wire cutting processes, or other processes. The weatherseals may be cut from a rotary blade and formed into a final shape. For example, the weatherseal may be slit open, machined with a high speed cutter to form the lumen, coated to seal the exposed ends, then mounted to a substrate. Flexible adhesive systems can be used to assemble segments in a clamshell configuration by passing two elongated machined strips of foam over an adhesive lick roll and joining the strips together, thus forming the lumens. Other methods of manufacture include laminating multiple elongates subcomponent foam rod-shaped extrusions into a shape with a set of guides and rollers using a combination of heat and coating materials. Small foam beads or assembled tubes with cellular walls may be fused together in a continuous shape. The weatherstrip or portions thereof may be 3D printed with a modified Stratasys or similar printer. Lumens formed within the profiles may be cut by similar technologies, or may be machined or otherwise formed in the profiles utilizing, e.g., elongate drilling bits or other machining tools.
Desirable manufacturing processes also include extrusion and co-extrusion processes, such as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,607,629; 5,393,796, and 5,192,586, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. U.S. Pat. No. 7,718,251 also describes fabric-clad foam weatherseals, and such technologies may also be incorporated into the hinged, hollow profile technologies described herein. Electrical discharge machining (EDM) methods and design innovations have led to production of extrusion dies and back plates that may be used to produce complex profiles having one or more lumens, varied skin thicknesses, and other features. Very thin die openings with very delicate mandrel spider leg supports allow for unique foam shape control for very thin outer and inner reinforcing walls. Thin die openings also allow the foam to “knit” back together, creating a seamless finished product. The thin dies also allow a shape to maintain an inflated structure with an inner network of inner reinforcing walls or ribs, thus providing a process to design and produce, e.g., very large, complex multi-hollow foam profiles. Back-plates can be used that approximate the shape of the profile and guide the melt in a predetermined manner toward specific areas of the front plate.
The dies may be used to produce profiles having walls only three cells thick in certain locations. TPE foam cells vary from 0.010″-0.050″ diameter, depending on the polymer composition and the operating parameters. The cells are somewhat interactive with adjacent cells via random openings in their walls, allowing a restricted flow of air through the cell matrix. This allows air to be evacuated upon foam compression and to be returned to the cell matrix upon de-compression. The dies provide good shape control since the cells expand laterally, with minimal distortion, and allow for precise flexibility in areas designed to be hinges. Thin internal walls may need smaller cell structure with lower porosity in order to limit internal off-gassing while achieving low densities. Internal off-gassing inflates and distends lumens and can be controlled during the cooling process. Further development and control of foam cell size and density through process controls, base material changes, and additives may control rate of off-gassing during cell formation.
Materials utilized in the manufacture of the described weatherseals are identified in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,607,629; 5,393,796; and 5,192,586, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. Materials also include SANTOPRENE™, manufactured by the ExxonMobil Corporation; Sarlink manufactured by Teknor Apex Company; and Elastron Thermoplastic Elastomers, manufactured by Elastron Kimya A.S. Thermoset components may be applied during manufacture to improve compression set resistance. Lumens may also be formed in EPDM or urethane profiles.
A number of example weatherseals incorporating certain technologies described herein, are depicted below. In general, all of the following examples include a profile, a stiffener, an outer skin or resin coating, upper and lower leaves integral with each other (e.g., joined at a hinge), and one or more lumens in various locations. Further details regarding certain of these aspects for particular examples are described further below. A person of skill in the art, upon reading the above disclosure and following examples, will be able to produce further differing examples.
Select Test Data
As described above, it is desirable that the TPE foam weatherseals described herein display performance similar to urethane foam weatherseals. Table 1 depicts results of Door Closing Force tests and compares a number of different products. Q-lon is a urethane weatherseal manufactured by Schlegel of Rochester, N.Y. FOAM-TITE™ is a foam TPE weatherseal manufactured by Amesbury Group, Inc., of Amesbury, Mass. These two products were tested and the performance was compared to a foamed TPE weatherseal consistent with EXAMPLE 7, above. As can be seen, the EXAMPLE 7 product has a lower closing force than the Q-lon product and significantly lower closing force than the Foam-Tite product, which is manufactured from a like TPE material. As such, the EXAMPLE 7 product displays very desirable performance properties.
Table 2 depicts various performance data for a foamed TPE weatherseal consistent with EXAMPLE 7 above, as compared to two Q-lon products. The data includes weatherseal reach, force to close, air leakage, and water penetration, before and after 250,000 cycles. The data indicates that the EXAMPLE 7 product displays desirable force to close and reach, even after the test cycles are performed. The weatherseal also passes both the air leakage and water penetration tests, consistent with the Q-lon products.
Table 3 depicts door seal CLD test data for Q-lon products, a FOAM-TITE™ product, and a number of examples of the above described low-CLD foam TPE products (specifically, EXAMPLES 4, 5, 7, and 10). CLD is measured for a newly-manufactured product. CLD is measured by compressing a 1″ sample of the tested weatherstrip having a nominal height of 0.650″. The weatherstrip is compressed at a compression rate of 1″/minute until compression of ⅜″ is reached. The compression is performed with a CHATTILON force gauge. Under such test conditions, a CLD of less than about 1.25 lb/ft of weatherstrip would be desirable. As can be seen, the tested samples consistent with EXAMPLES 4, 5, 7, and 10 display lower CLDs than the comparably sized Q-lon products. The FOAM-TITE™ weatherstrip without lumens displays a very high CLD.
While there have been described herein what are to be considered exemplary and preferred embodiments of the present technology, other modifications of the technology will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the teachings herein. The particular methods of manufacture and geometries disclosed herein are exemplary in nature and are not to be considered limiting. It is therefore desired to be secured in the appended claims all such modifications as fall within the spirit and scope of the technology. Accordingly, what is desired to be secured by Letters Patent is the technology as defined and differentiated in the following claims, and all equivalents.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/116,105, filed, Feb. 13, 2015, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein it its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
343345 | Sparks | Jun 1886 | A |
874938 | Cazin | Dec 1907 | A |
1312034 | Jones | Aug 1919 | A |
1776073 | Girard | Sep 1930 | A |
1805145 | Koops | May 1931 | A |
1826297 | Apple | Oct 1931 | A |
1943818 | Fantone | Jan 1934 | A |
1960137 | Brown | May 1934 | A |
1960997 | Halloran | May 1934 | A |
2012625 | Calcutt | Aug 1935 | A |
2115368 | Lustberg | Apr 1938 | A |
2127413 | Leguillon | Aug 1938 | A |
2138699 | Hinze | Nov 1938 | A |
2175099 | Abbott | Oct 1939 | A |
2199067 | Bradt | Apr 1940 | A |
2200933 | Nystrom | May 1940 | A |
2218482 | Reevely | Oct 1940 | A |
2280415 | Larmuth | Apr 1942 | A |
2293252 | Foster | Aug 1942 | A |
2314168 | Smith | Mar 1943 | A |
2341450 | Knaus | Feb 1944 | A |
2354426 | Briant | Jul 1944 | A |
2366077 | Wildy et al. | Dec 1944 | A |
2386995 | Wigal | Oct 1945 | A |
2390780 | Cornwell | Dec 1945 | A |
2415721 | Amer | Feb 1947 | A |
2459120 | Sparagen | Jan 1949 | A |
2550520 | Bennett | Apr 1951 | A |
2555380 | Stuart et al. | Jun 1951 | A |
2602959 | Fenlin | Jul 1952 | A |
2623444 | Maier et al. | Dec 1952 | A |
2626426 | Stahl | Jan 1953 | A |
2657414 | Miller et al. | Nov 1953 | A |
2677633 | Gross | May 1954 | A |
2695421 | Amundson et al. | Nov 1954 | A |
2724877 | Ramsay | Nov 1955 | A |
2726632 | Asbeck et al. | Dec 1955 | A |
2748044 | Seiler | May 1956 | A |
2754543 | Loew | Jul 1956 | A |
2757709 | Crabbe et al. | Aug 1956 | A |
2761417 | Russell et al. | Sep 1956 | A |
2761418 | Russell | Sep 1956 | A |
2761791 | Russell | Sep 1956 | A |
2778059 | Henning et al. | Jan 1957 | A |
2786622 | Ross et al. | Mar 1957 | A |
2797443 | Carlson | Jul 1957 | A |
2821497 | Works et al. | Jan 1958 | A |
2838813 | Naramore | Jun 1958 | A |
2839796 | Quoss | Jun 1958 | A |
2868159 | Lit et al. | Jan 1959 | A |
2874752 | Brey | Feb 1959 | A |
2880698 | Olson | Apr 1959 | A |
2911382 | Barkhnff et al. | Nov 1959 | A |
2933782 | Comell | Apr 1960 | A |
2933784 | Hooverson | Apr 1960 | A |
2952240 | Abbott | Sep 1960 | A |
2977632 | Bunch | Apr 1961 | A |
3029779 | Hornbostel | Apr 1962 | A |
3032008 | Land et al. | May 1962 | A |
3032812 | Van Riper | May 1962 | A |
3041681 | Goodwin | Jul 1962 | A |
3041682 | Alderfer et al. | Jul 1962 | A |
3075653 | Wales et al. | Jan 1963 | A |
3081213 | Chinn | Mar 1963 | A |
3155540 | Loeffler et al. | Nov 1964 | A |
3155543 | Marzocchi et al. | Nov 1964 | A |
3167827 | Alley et al. | Feb 1965 | A |
3184808 | Lyon | May 1965 | A |
3184811 | Bennett et al. | May 1965 | A |
3206323 | Miller et al. | Sep 1965 | A |
3227577 | Baessler et al. | Jan 1966 | A |
3238573 | Pease, Jr. | Mar 1966 | A |
3251911 | Hansen | May 1966 | A |
3287477 | Vesilind | Nov 1966 | A |
3309439 | Nonweiler | Mar 1967 | A |
3350248 | Demarest, Jr. et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
3378956 | Parks et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3385001 | Bordner | May 1968 | A |
3407253 | Yoshimura et al. | Oct 1968 | A |
3412709 | Goyffon | Nov 1968 | A |
3420208 | Guthrie | Jan 1969 | A |
3424130 | Byrnes et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
3448543 | Multer | Jun 1969 | A |
3450098 | Williams | Jun 1969 | A |
3469349 | Multer | Sep 1969 | A |
3471898 | Krystof | Oct 1969 | A |
3473512 | Wood | Oct 1969 | A |
3482006 | Carlson | Dec 1969 | A |
3531829 | Skobel et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
3535824 | Kessler | Oct 1970 | A |
3564773 | Bonnaud | Feb 1971 | A |
3595204 | McIntyre | Jul 1971 | A |
3596432 | Straub et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3624964 | Bordner et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3635620 | Brown | Jan 1972 | A |
3669062 | Kallianides et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3672974 | Tomlinson | Jun 1972 | A |
3685206 | Kessler | Aug 1972 | A |
3700368 | Wells | Oct 1972 | A |
3700486 | Veltri et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3733660 | Kallianides et al. | May 1973 | A |
3737490 | Nicholson | Jun 1973 | A |
3755873 | Lansing | Sep 1973 | A |
3762100 | Kempel | Oct 1973 | A |
3767454 | Franke, Jr. et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3781390 | Wells | Dec 1973 | A |
3782870 | Schippers | Jan 1974 | A |
3789099 | Garrett et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3811989 | Hearn | May 1974 | A |
3813199 | Friesner | May 1974 | A |
3814779 | Wiley | Jun 1974 | A |
3815637 | Carrow | Jun 1974 | A |
3827841 | Kawai et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3836297 | Weaver | Sep 1974 | A |
3840384 | Reade et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3841807 | Weaver | Oct 1974 | A |
3842564 | Brown | Oct 1974 | A |
3843475 | Kent | Oct 1974 | A |
3869325 | Witzig | Mar 1975 | A |
3874329 | McLarty | Apr 1975 | A |
3876487 | Garrett et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3882817 | Zink | May 1975 | A |
3882819 | Skeeters | May 1975 | A |
3886898 | Colegrove et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
3888713 | Alderfer | Jun 1975 | A |
3903233 | Dougherty | Sep 1975 | A |
3907536 | Achener | Sep 1975 | A |
3918206 | Dochnahl | Nov 1975 | A |
3928521 | Haren et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3937644 | Bergeron et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3940467 | Brachman | Feb 1976 | A |
3941543 | Buonanno | Mar 1976 | A |
3944459 | Skobel | Mar 1976 | A |
3952552 | Rozner | Apr 1976 | A |
3956438 | Schippers | May 1976 | A |
3965931 | Skobel | Jun 1976 | A |
3981830 | Takeuchi et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
3999509 | Lucas | Dec 1976 | A |
4020194 | McIntyre et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4049760 | Lozach | Sep 1977 | A |
4073408 | Hartwig | Feb 1978 | A |
4075851 | Gardner | Feb 1978 | A |
4077443 | Coller et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4087223 | Angioletti et al. | May 1978 | A |
4096973 | Checko | Jun 1978 | A |
4104207 | Pelikan et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4106437 | Bartlett | Aug 1978 | A |
4107260 | Dougherty | Aug 1978 | A |
4116159 | Long | Sep 1978 | A |
4117196 | Mathias | Sep 1978 | A |
4118166 | Bartrum | Oct 1978 | A |
4119325 | Oakley et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4123100 | Ellis | Oct 1978 | A |
4124336 | Johnson | Nov 1978 | A |
4130535 | Coran et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4144838 | Ichiyanagi et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4156044 | Mracek et al. | May 1979 | A |
4157149 | Moen | Jun 1979 | A |
4181647 | Beach | Jan 1980 | A |
4181780 | Brenner et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4185416 | Wilmes | Jan 1980 | A |
4187068 | Vassar | Feb 1980 | A |
4189520 | Gauchel | Feb 1980 | A |
4200207 | Akers et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4204496 | Ikegami et al. | May 1980 | A |
4204821 | Gauchel et al. | May 1980 | A |
4206011 | Kanotz et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4208200 | Claypoole et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4212787 | Matsuda et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4222729 | Ragazzini et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4226662 | McCort | Oct 1980 | A |
4238260 | Washkewicz | Dec 1980 | A |
4246299 | Ohls | Jan 1981 | A |
4258646 | Kloczewski et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4259379 | Britton et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4263348 | Renegar | Apr 1981 | A |
4274596 | Howes | Jun 1981 | A |
4274821 | Kiemer | Jun 1981 | A |
4277301 | McIntyre et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4287684 | McKann | Sep 1981 | A |
4288482 | Beck | Sep 1981 | A |
4290249 | Mass | Sep 1981 | A |
4296062 | Gauchel et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4299186 | Pipkin et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4299187 | Renegar | Nov 1981 | A |
4305900 | Cavalli | Dec 1981 | A |
4305984 | Boyce | Dec 1981 | A |
4308352 | Knaus | Dec 1981 | A |
4309160 | Poutanen et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4311628 | Abdou-Sabet et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4312950 | Snyder et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4312958 | DiGiulio et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4313645 | Cocco | Feb 1982 | A |
4314834 | Feenstra et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4321072 | Dubos et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4323655 | DiGiulio et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4328273 | Yackiw | May 1982 | A |
4341509 | Harlow | Jul 1982 | A |
4343845 | Burden et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4344710 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4347806 | Argazzi et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4352892 | Lohmar | Oct 1982 | A |
4354989 | Beach | Oct 1982 | A |
4356216 | Gailey et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4358497 | Miska | Nov 1982 | A |
4360395 | Suzuki | Nov 1982 | A |
4368224 | Jackson | Jan 1983 | A |
4370355 | Niesse | Jan 1983 | A |
4387123 | Wollam et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4401612 | Nehmey et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4401783 | Kotian | Aug 1983 | A |
4409165 | Kim | Oct 1983 | A |
4409365 | Coran et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4411941 | Azzola | Oct 1983 | A |
4419309 | Krutchen | Dec 1983 | A |
4419958 | Roba | Dec 1983 | A |
4421867 | Nojiri et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4438223 | Hunter | Mar 1984 | A |
4442788 | Weis | Apr 1984 | A |
4446179 | Waugh | May 1984 | A |
4454687 | Baker | Jun 1984 | A |
4458376 | Sitko | Jul 1984 | A |
4458450 | Young et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4470941 | Kurtz | Sep 1984 | A |
4474830 | Taylor | Oct 1984 | A |
4476165 | McIntyre | Oct 1984 | A |
4477298 | Bohannon, Jr. et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4510031 | Matsumura et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4510884 | Rosebrooks | Apr 1985 | A |
4512945 | Vigano | Apr 1985 | A |
4517316 | Mason | May 1985 | A |
4526736 | Searl et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4527825 | Clouse | Jul 1985 | A |
4530851 | Shannon et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4532260 | MacKeighen et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4535564 | Yackiw | Aug 1985 | A |
4537825 | Yardley | Aug 1985 | A |
4538380 | Colliander | Sep 1985 | A |
4557217 | Zingg | Dec 1985 | A |
4559095 | Babbin | Dec 1985 | A |
4562023 | Pabst et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4563141 | Zoller | Jan 1986 | A |
4568507 | Baxter | Feb 1986 | A |
4569704 | Bohannon, Jr. et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4581383 | Park | Apr 1986 | A |
4583485 | Smith, Jr. | Apr 1986 | A |
4585035 | Piccoli | Apr 1986 | A |
4587133 | Shannon et al. | May 1986 | A |
4589367 | Renegar et al. | May 1986 | A |
4593062 | Puydak et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4600728 | MacKeighen et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4601918 | Zaman et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4604300 | Keys et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4613521 | Smith, Jr. | Sep 1986 | A |
4616052 | Habibullah | Oct 1986 | A |
4622092 | Bohannon, Jr. et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4623501 | Ishizaki | Nov 1986 | A |
4628639 | Lownsdale | Dec 1986 | A |
4644898 | Jochem et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4649856 | Shannon et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4651672 | Sommer | Mar 1987 | A |
4652475 | Haney et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4654262 | Alonso | Mar 1987 | A |
4656785 | Yackiw | Apr 1987 | A |
4658548 | Gerritsen | Apr 1987 | A |
4659746 | Topcik | Apr 1987 | A |
4660147 | Allen, Jr. et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4668319 | Piccoli | May 1987 | A |
4680317 | Kuhnel et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4683166 | Yuto et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4687137 | Boger et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4688515 | Rosebrooks | Aug 1987 | A |
4694627 | Omholt | Sep 1987 | A |
4695236 | Predohl et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4707172 | Sottini et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4708351 | Midooka et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4719039 | Leonardi | Jan 1988 | A |
4720936 | Ellingson | Jan 1988 | A |
4721591 | Cheng-Shiang | Jan 1988 | A |
4722818 | Zoller | Feb 1988 | A |
4725468 | McIntyre | Feb 1988 | A |
4729807 | Hede et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4730416 | Eames | Mar 1988 | A |
4735169 | Cawston et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4738810 | Cheng-Shiang | Apr 1988 | A |
4742646 | Kehrli | May 1988 | A |
4746477 | Wecker et al. | May 1988 | A |
4746545 | McIntyre | May 1988 | A |
4756271 | Maier | Jul 1988 | A |
4767183 | Martin | Aug 1988 | A |
4774109 | Hadzimihalis et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4778367 | Hilakos | Oct 1988 | A |
4805554 | McIntyre | Feb 1989 | A |
4807397 | Doan | Feb 1989 | A |
4844004 | Hadzimihalis et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4856975 | Gearhart | Aug 1989 | A |
4857668 | Buonanno | Aug 1989 | A |
4865676 | Kimura et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4880674 | Shimizu | Nov 1989 | A |
4883690 | Carter | Nov 1989 | A |
4883691 | McIntyre | Nov 1989 | A |
4889669 | Suzuki | Dec 1989 | A |
4891249 | McIntyre | Jan 1990 | A |
4894105 | Dyksterhouse et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4898760 | Halberstadt | Feb 1990 | A |
4900490 | Kozma | Feb 1990 | A |
4907741 | McIntyre | Mar 1990 | A |
4916863 | Burrous et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4918111 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4919739 | Dyksterhouse et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4930257 | Windgassen | Jun 1990 | A |
4940557 | Kimura | Jul 1990 | A |
4943472 | Dyksterhouse et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4968854 | Benn, Sr. et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4984533 | Takahashi et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5000988 | Inoue et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5001865 | Procton | Mar 1991 | A |
5007203 | Katrynuik | Apr 1991 | A |
5009947 | McManus et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5070111 | Dumbauld | Dec 1991 | A |
5075139 | Crumbach et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5087488 | Cakmakci | Feb 1992 | A |
5093181 | Sanchez | Mar 1992 | A |
5094792 | Baran | Mar 1992 | A |
5128198 | Dyksterhouse et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5143772 | Iwasa | Sep 1992 | A |
5156715 | Starnes, Jr. | Oct 1992 | A |
5160541 | Fickling et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5169449 | Raught | Dec 1992 | A |
5186279 | Chasteen et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5192586 | Mertinooke et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5205890 | Darsey et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5221346 | Anderson | Jun 1993 | A |
5237383 | Parisi | Aug 1993 | A |
5237917 | Traut et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5251809 | Drummond et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5266019 | Farber | Nov 1993 | A |
5271794 | Jarrell et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5326592 | Goewey et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5354378 | Hauser et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5368644 | Delgado | Nov 1994 | A |
5382401 | Pickett et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5393796 | Halberstadt et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5409733 | Boger et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5411785 | Cook | May 1995 | A |
5415822 | Cook | May 1995 | A |
5418009 | Raterman et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421921 | Gill et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5423935 | Benecke et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5426894 | Headrick | Jun 1995 | A |
5429840 | Raterman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5438802 | Johnson | Aug 1995 | A |
5442825 | Hahn | Aug 1995 | A |
5449408 | Koaizawa et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5451355 | Boissonnat et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5458291 | Brusko et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5474841 | Matsuki et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5512601 | Halberstadt et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5516545 | Sandock | May 1996 | A |
5524828 | Raterman et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5525668 | Olivier | Jun 1996 | A |
5533675 | Benecke et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5538380 | Norton et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5538754 | Sandock | Jul 1996 | A |
5571326 | Boissonnat et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5573638 | Lennon et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5574118 | Olivier | Nov 1996 | A |
5586963 | Lennon et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5588997 | Lysson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5601646 | Gardner et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607629 | DeMello et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5636790 | Brusko et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5654346 | Halberstadt et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5656086 | Hultzsch et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5665164 | Milliman | Sep 1997 | A |
5683036 | Benecke et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5685911 | Raterman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5686165 | Cook | Nov 1997 | A |
5700845 | Chung et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5728406 | Halberstadt et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728430 | Sartor et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728911 | Hall | Mar 1998 | A |
5733608 | Kessel et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5788889 | DeMello et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795516 | Cho et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801209 | Chung et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5802948 | Andrisin, III et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5804284 | Lennon et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824400 | Petrakis et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5843230 | Potjer et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5843231 | Spencer et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5851566 | Potjer et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5875555 | Andrisin, III et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887392 | Martin | Mar 1999 | A |
5903004 | Koshihara et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907004 | Dozeman et al. | May 1999 | A |
5943825 | Procton | Aug 1999 | A |
5948858 | Dorrestijn et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5962075 | Sartor et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968854 | Akopian et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5995693 | Yang et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6132809 | Hynes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6227634 | Cittadini | May 2001 | B1 |
6514604 | Gopalan et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6623014 | Martin | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6677020 | Dron | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6776948 | Arvidson et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6883847 | Willett | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6968649 | Van Den Oord | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7017305 | Ikuta | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7281354 | Nishihara | Oct 2007 | B2 |
D571932 | Van Camp | Jun 2008 | S |
7419555 | Kaplo et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7718251 | Huntress et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
8225554 | Nozaki | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8510996 | Foster | Aug 2013 | B2 |
9358716 | Huntress et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
20040074719 | Loughney | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040123532 | Thill et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050102929 | Hoffmann et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050186396 | Okajima et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070113482 | Dumke | May 2007 | A1 |
20070218270 | Huntress et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20090313900 | Foster | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100136317 | Huntress et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20140199512 | Abramson | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150240556 | Ellingson | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160237737 | Mertinooke et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160318226 | Huntress et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20180283089 | Mertinooke | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180328103 | Mertinooke | Nov 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
852096 | Sep 1970 | CA |
1177212 | Nov 1984 | CA |
101249793 | Aug 2008 | CN |
201521229 | Jul 2010 | CN |
101952132 | Jan 2011 | CN |
202157669 | Mar 2012 | CN |
203719299 | Jul 2014 | CN |
3503200 | May 1986 | DE |
202004007829 | Jul 2004 | DE |
102008046753 | Mar 2010 | DE |
260674 | Mar 1988 | EP |
996552 | Jan 1991 | EP |
1222085 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1227947 | May 2001 | EP |
1590375 | May 1970 | FR |
2200109 | Apr 1974 | FR |
2310207 | Dec 1980 | FR |
2572678 | May 1986 | FR |
1160043 | Jul 1969 | GB |
1305808 | Feb 1973 | GB |
1409441 | Oct 1975 | GB |
1467534 | Mar 1977 | GB |
1507071 | Apr 1978 | GB |
1545511 | May 1979 | GB |
2067104 | Jul 1981 | GB |
1595214 | Aug 1981 | GB |
2132509 | Jul 1984 | GB |
2136484 | Sep 1984 | GB |
2146940 | May 1985 | GB |
2146941 | May 1985 | GB |
2179270 | Mar 1987 | GB |
2226965 | Jul 1990 | GB |
2355480 | Apr 2001 | GB |
55-101438 | Aug 1980 | JP |
58-168544 | Oct 1983 | JP |
S59-54535 | Mar 1984 | JP |
01101267 | Apr 1989 | JP |
9858528 | Dec 1998 | WO |
2005028231 | Mar 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application PCT/US2016/017843, dated May 19, 2016, 12 pgs. |
Amesbury Sealing Products, Foam-Tite Selection Guide, 2013, 1 page. Applicant Admitted Prior Art. |
Amesbury Sealing Products, Foam-Tite Foam Seals Part # 12083, copyright 2013, located online at: http://www.amesbury.com/divisions/sealing-products/parts/4/160 on Jul. 19, 2017, 1 page. |
Schlegel, Q-LON QEBD 650 Door Seal, Jun. 2008, 2 pages. Applicant Admitted Prior Art. |
Schlegel, Profile Selection Guide Building Products Devision, Jun. 2008, 2 pages. Applicant Admitted Prior Art. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application PCT/U82016/017801, dated May 2, 2016, 14 pages. |
“Foam Extrusion Technology for TP Elastomer” Plastic Technology, Feb. 1987, pp. 23 and 25. |
Bridge, Ralph, “Polymer Extrusion”, [online], May 5, 1997, pp. 1-8 [retrieved on Jun. 14, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet:<URL: http://www.cngr.uconn.edu/cheg/polymer/c256hnp.htm>. |
Han, C. D. et al., “Studies on Wire Coating Extrusion. I. The Rheology of Wire Coating Extrusion”, Polymer Engineering and Science, vol. 18, No. 13, pp. 1019-1029 (Oct. 1978). |
Marketing information excerpt, Fenestration, p. 66 (Jan./Feb. 2001). |
Marketing information excerpt, Window & Door.TM., p. 52 (Jun./Jul. 2000). |
Monsanto Technical Correspondence, “Extrusion Foaming Technology for SANTOPRENE.RTM. Thermoplastic Rubber”, SANTOPRENE.RTM. Thermoplastic Rubber, 18 pages (May 10, 1988). |
Monsanto Technical Paper, “Extrusion Foaming Technology for SANTOPRENE.RTM. Thermoplastic Rubber”, SANTOPRENE.RTM. Thermoplastic Rubber, 16 pages (May 13, 1987). |
OMEGA Engineering Inc, Specification for “Low Flow Air Process and Liquid Circulation Heaters”, Online Catalogue: Electric Heater Products, [online], p. J-20 [retrieved on Jan. 31, 2003]. Retrieved from the lnternet:<URL: http://www.omega.com/toc.sub.-asp/frameset.html?book=Heaters&file=AHPF.s-ub.-HEATER>. |
OMEGA Engineering Inc, Specification for the “T Type air Process Heaters for In-Line Air and Gas Heating”, Online Cataogue: Electric Heater Products, [online], pp. J-17, J-18 “retrieved on Jan. 31, 2003”. Retrieved from thelnternet:<URL:http://www.omega.com/toc.sub.-asp/frameset.html?book=Heaters&file=AHP.sub.-SERIES>. |
OMEGA Engineering Inc., Specification for the “OMEGALUX AH-66136 Process Air Heater”, Online Catalogue: Electric Heater Products, [online], pp. J-15, J-16 [retrieved on Jan. 31, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet:<URL: http://www.omega.com/toc.sub.--asp/frameset.html?book=Heaters&file=AHC HEATER>. |
Rogers, Tracy, “Weatherseals. Keeping Your Customers Warm and Dry,” Window and Door Fabricator TM, pp. 48, 50-51 (Oct./Nov. 1997). |
Ultrafab, Inc., Advertisement—The UltraCell Bulb (1 pg.), shown at WIN-DOOR 2000, Toronto Congress Center, Toronto, ON (Nov. 15-17, 2000). |
Ultrafab, Inc., Advertisement—UItra-Grip, USGlass, Metal and Glazing, 1 pg. (Mar. 2001). |
Partial International Search Report for PCT/US07/006056 dated Aug. 27, 2007, 5 pp. |
Schenectady International, SP-1077*, description and specifications, UM00040 Rev. 1 (01/01), 1 page. |
Chinese Office Action in Application 201680021533.5, dated Dec. 18, 2018, 8 pages. (No English Translation) |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160237738 A1 | Aug 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62116105 | Feb 2015 | US |