1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to electronic capacitive touch sensors on film substrates, and in particular to those which incorporate four color graphics and designs behind clear plastic protective films.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Mass produced products like toys are highly sensitive to component costs. So circuits and construction methods for making interactive toys must be very inexpensive to manufacture.
A conventional inexpensive toy electric guitar for children has been made from sheets of paper cut in the shape of a guitar with a body, neck, and headstock, then essentially a photograph of an attractive guitar is printed on top. The printed photograph shows all the details of wood grain, frets, strings, saddle, sound hole, pickups, bridge and adjusting knobs. On the backside, a plastic film with printed circuits for touch pads is glued on using adhesives. This assembly is then fitted to a thick plastic body frame for support, and a pigtail from the printed circuits for the touch pads is plugged into an amplifier module.
The downside with this type of construction is the paper and adhesives can constitute the major component costs. And printing photographs on the outside on top of paper makes it very vulnerable to user wear and the environment. Such color printings on paper also tend to produce poor quality results, the lines and details are not sharp and crisp.
Subassemblies of capacitive touch sensors are very often manufactured in places in the world that have high humidity, and the shipping containers they are sent in can be dripping-wet inside. Paper based products do not survive well in these conditions, and metal based conductive inks tend to corrode and fail. So better alternatives with passivation coatings and protective finishes need to be supplied.
A few commercial products have used graphics printed on plastic, but they assemble their electronic capacitive touch sensors separately behind the graphic sheets. Such types of construction add to the costs and increase problems with reliability and service life. The manufacturing costs associated with mass produced consumer electronics are often the number one consideration behind functionality, and saving just a few cents per items can translate to millions of dollars in increased sales and profits.
What is needed is a thin, but rugged, capacitive touch sensor that is more attractive and less expensive to mass produce than conventional devices.
Briefly, a capacitive touch sensor embodiment of the present invention comprises a first plastic film on which keyboard graphics and other designs are disposed on the reverse side of the film, and basically the bare plastic substrate is all that is exposed to the environment and user wear. Non-conductive color inks are used in printing the graphics so that any printed capacitive touch sensors behind will not be short circuited or desensitized. A silk screen printing of an opaque layer is such that a print-free margin is left all around the edges to allow a later application of adhesive to grip a more durable surface underneath. The capacitive touch sensors are silk-screen printed, deposited or etched on a second plastic film with conductive inks or foils. This is then laminated with the printed sensors toward the graphics printed side of the first plastic film using a silk-screen applied liquid water-based adhesive. A final overcoat of adhesive is applied to the bare backside of the second plastic film for final assembly to a frame or chassis.
Embodiments of the present invention protect the graphics and sensor traces from both user wear and environmental exposure, and they do this in a cost effective way that can be produced in high volume.
These and other objects and advantages of the present invention will no doubt become obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art after having read the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments that are illustrated in the various drawing figures.
Embodiments of the present invention span all consumer electronics device applications that are mass produced and depend on capacitive touch sensors for user interaction. For example, in one particular application,
An opaque mask 106 is printed behind the reverse-image graphics 104, and a print-free margin 108 is left all around to allow any sequent application of liquid adhesive a tougher surface to grip on to. It was found in drop-test experiments that a typical opaque mask 106 can delaminate at its edges in the area of print-free margin 108.
A second plastic film 110 with a pattern of capacitive touch sensors 112 are silk-screened, deposited, or etched with conductive inks or foils on its front side. The respective capacitive touch sensors are mapped or registered with corresponding images represented in the reverse-image graphics and designs of non-conductive inks 104. Capacitive touch sensors 108 are a patterned layer of conductive inks configured for electronic touch sensing of finger contacts on the front side of the first plastic film 102. A pigtail 114 provides for the electrical connection of capacitive touch sensors 112 to an electronics module that provides touch sensing, tone generation, and amplification.
A laminating adhesive 115 is applied to the backside of the opaque mask 106 and margin 108 using a silk-screen applied liquid water-based adhesive. The particular adhesives used need to be applied precisely and uniformly, and so screen printing is a very good method to use. Of course, other kinds of adhesives can be applied with various conventional methods that allow for the adhesive-free margin 112.
In one application, 3M™ SP7533 Screen-Printable water-based adhesive was applied at 0.012 mm (0.47 mils) thickness and provided good results. 3M Screen-Printable Adhesive SP7533 is a waterborne emulsion adhesive. Once dried, this adhesive can not be re-emulsified, and therefore provides a humidity barrier that can stop corrosion of the conductive inks and foils that would otherwise occur. Drying times range from five minutes at 160-degrees Fahrenheit to thirty minutes at seventy-seven degrees Fahrenheit. 3M publishes a February, 2003, Application Guide and a Technical Bulletin available on the Internet. A final overcoat of adhesive is applied to the bare backside of the second plastic film 110 for final assembly to a frame or chassis 114.
In one alternative, the pattern of capacitive touch sensors 108 is etched from conventional copper-clad flexible printed circuit board materials. In another example, they are printed on the second plastic film 110 with silk-screen printers using silver, carbon, copper, indium-tin oxide (ITO), nano-particles, or other impregnated inks. The materials used for the second plastic film 110 need not be clear, or transparent, but they should be heat-treated to reduce shrinkage and otherwise treated to improve surface bonding. Therefore, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), and other types of opaque thermoplastics can be used. ABS polymers are resistant to aqueous acids, alkalis, concentrated hydrochloric and phosphoric acids, alcohols and animal, vegetable and mineral oils. ABS polymers can be swollen by glacial acetic acid, carbon tetrachloride and aromatic hydrocarbons, and are attacked by concentrated sulfuric and nitric acids. ABS polymers are soluble in esters, ketones and ethylene dichloride.
A laminating adhesive 116 is applied to the backside of the second plastic film 110 using a silk-screen applied liquid water-based adhesive for assembly into a supporting frame 118. The first and second plastic films 102 and 110 with their respective printings and adhesives are mounted into a supporting frame 118. Pigtail 114 is folded over and passed through supporting frame 118 for connection to an electronics module (such as shown in
Although a toy guitar application has been illustrated as an exemplary embodiment, other embodiments are also cost effective and attractive. For example, as a drum, a keyboard, or touch pad for a laptop portable computer, and even a smart phone.
An entire assembly of printed plastic and sensors may be connected to electronic circuitry with an anisotropic conductive film (ACF) or conductive pressure-sensitive adhesive (PSA) bond. Such can then be fastened to a toy, a door, a backpack, clothing, and another surfaces with an appropriate adhesive. These devices are useful in products that employ touch sensing through plastic, and add a new dimension with the colorful, sharp, and durable graphics made possible.
A second plastic film 206 with a pigtail connector 207 has a pattern of printed sensors 208 deposited or etched with conductive inks or foils on its reverse side. An adhesive lamination layer 210 joins the bare front side of the second plastic film 206 to the reverse-image non-conductive inks 204 using a silk-screen applied liquid water-based adhesive. An opaque white-free margin 212 is left all around the outside edges of the opaque-white print layer 210. A final overcoat of adhesive 214 provides for final assembly to a frame or chassis 216.
The primary benefits of constructing sensors like those of
The electrical connection of the conductive ink sensor layers 108, 208, 306, 406, and 506, to a sensor, tone generator, and amplifier electronics module is sometimes complicated by the conductors being on the “wrong” side of the carrier film. The usual configurations in practice include a finger of plastic film from the substrate supporting the conductive ink sensor layers that is folded over behind to plug into a connector on the electronics module. If there is a mismatch because of the single-sided circuit board configurations involved, the connections need to be “flipped-over” with an adapter or pigtail.
3M describes its electrically conductive adhesive transfer tape 9703 as a pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA) transfer tape with anisotropic electrical conductivity. The PSA matrix is filled with conductive particles which allow interconnection between substrates through the adhesive thickness (Z-axis) which are spaced far enough apart to be electrically insulating in the plane of the adhesive. The PSA tack properties and no thermal curing needed make tape 9703 easy to use in assembly operations. Tape 9703 electrically connects and mechanically bonds medium pitch flexible circuits with other flexible circuits (flex), rigid printed circuit boards (PCB) or LCD screens. Electrically conductive tape 9703 has good adhesion to common PCB substrates such as copper, gold, FR-4 epoxy, Kapton™ polyimide and polyester films. Mechanical clamping is sometimes advisable. Tape 9703 also electrically connects and mechanically bonds EMI/RFI shield and gaskets to metal frames and enclosures. The low contact resistance and tape construction result in good EMI performance. Tape 9703 can be applied as die cut parts or in roll form and has good adhesion to common EMI/RFI substrates such as aluminum, stainless steel, and smooth gasket materials.
Opaque white masks with paint-free margins are included to optimize adhesion characteristics. Another benefit of using single layer construction is that the conductive traces are closer to the surface and thus able to achieve a better capacitive response than other designs.
Combinations of the various building blocks described here can be used to make decorative capacitive sensors. The opaque masks described are primarily included obscure any view of the sensor layer, underlying structures, lighting, etc. from leaking through to the user. However, if the graphics used are dense enough, that alone can be relied on to hide the sensors. In some cases, it may be acceptable if the sensors and other devices visually show through, in which case the add-on opaque layers can be omitted.
Single-layer solutions are fully integrated devices. In one type, the color graphics, opaque mask, printed silver ink touch sensors, and adhesive application are all disposed on a back side of a PET layer, for example. In a second type of single layer solution, the color graphics and a top coating or laminated thin clear PET film are disposed on the front side of a heavier PET layer. An opaque mask, printed silver ink touch sensors, and adhesive application are disposed on a back side, for example.
Two-layer solutions, such in
Three-layer solutions include a two-layer solution with a base material inserted between the graphic and sensor laminations. The thickness of the base material is limited by how much the sensors will be desensitized. The base layer can be opaque, and so an additional opaque layer to hide the sensors is not required in either of the two laminations.
Multi-layer sensor solutions can include the above one, two, or three-layer solution with an additional sensor laminations assembled to the back side in order to create a multi-dimensional sensor array.
Double-sided graphic solutions can be realized by starting with a one, two, or three-layer solution, and then attaching another graphic lamination on the back side such that the graphic faces reverse. Single layer devices can be deployed on both the front or back sides of an application that requires equal qualities and responses on each side.
Double-sided graphics with complex arrays of sensors can be constructed using the above multi-layer sensor solutions with a graphic laminated to the back like in the double-sided graphic solution. The second sensor layer can comprise touch sensors deposited on top of a PET later, with an opaque mask and adhesive applied underneath.
Embodiments of the present invention employ alternative kinds of electrical connections for the capacitive touch sensors. Low temperature methods are required because excessive heat like used, e.g., in soldering will deform the PET film materials supporting the silver-ink features. Pigtail 114, for example in
Vias can be used on double-sided pigtails and electrical interfaces to connect one side to the other. This has effect of making the connection to the electronics on the same side as an integrated connector would. Such approach would be needed when an integrated connector is not an option, as it can be for single-layer solutions in which the pigtail is limited to the boundaries of a graphic.
In two-layer solutions in which the pigtail has to be inside the perimeters of the graphics lamination, a bump can show through or be felt. A filler piece of equal thickness will then be needed to surround the pigtail lead and even out the intervening laminations.
A filler 724 can be cut and inserted in the area of graphics lamination 712 under the area of pigtail 710 that was folded up.
The successful printing of conductive, silver-ink circuits and patterns on top of PET with four-color graphics and opaque masks requires thicker and more viscous inks than normal to bridge the gaps and prevent breaks that would otherwise occur during curing. The thickness of the lines used in experiments was one millimeter pitch minimum, meaning at least one millimeter between lines and 0.5-1 mm silver ink traces. The viscosity of the ink was not high, but it was higher than normal silver ink. The thickness was controlled by mixing different components together and was not quantified. The PET plastic was good up to 140 degrees centigrade, and was a high temperature grade PET.
A thinner silver ink PET layer can be used in order to minimize the cost of that layer. Single layer construction eliminates an extra PET layer and adhesive layer that can be costly and increase lower labor costs. Using screen printable adhesives can reduce the amount of wasted material and labor. Die-cutting machines can be use to produce both alignment holes and features, thus increasing accuracy and reducing the number of production steps. Laminations using alignment holes, as in
Using white PET to obscure the conductive traces of the sensor layers can cause the adhesives to become more visible. The viscosity of the adhesive is therefore lowered, making it even more uniform and using a thinner coat than usual to make it less visible.
Although the present invention has been described in terms of the presently preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not to be interpreted as limiting. Various alterations and modifications will no doubt become apparent to those skilled in the art after having read the above disclosure. Accordingly, it is intended that the appended claims be interpreted as covering all alterations and modifications as fall within the “true” spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4213367 | Moog | Jul 1980 | A |
4299041 | Wilson | Nov 1981 | A |
4852443 | Duncan et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5009463 | Saitoh et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5129654 | Bogner | Jul 1992 | A |
5188368 | Ryan | Feb 1993 | A |
5283711 | Schmitz | Feb 1994 | A |
5413518 | Lin | May 1995 | A |
5538430 | Smith | Jul 1996 | A |
5645432 | Jessop | Jul 1997 | A |
5853327 | Gilboa | Dec 1998 | A |
6168158 | Bulsink | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6661239 | Ozick | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6819316 | Schulz | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822640 | Derocher | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6828806 | Hirota et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
7242393 | Caldwell | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7276917 | Deangelis et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7301351 | Deangelis et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7368921 | Deangelis et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7395717 | DeAngelis et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7408109 | Freitas | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7439962 | Reynolds et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7465869 | Freitas | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7477242 | Cross | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7578195 | DeAngelis et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7737953 | Mackey | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7784366 | Daverman et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7932898 | Philipp et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8044665 | Joutsenoja et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8552991 | Yoon | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20010033009 | Inoue et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20060038791 | Mackey | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070031161 | Iandoli | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070062739 | Philipp et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070164994 | Inoue et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070229464 | Hotelling et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080202912 | Boddie et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080236374 | Kramer et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080238433 | Joutsenoja et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080238448 | Moore et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080238706 | Kenwright | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090260508 | Elion | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090309303 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090315258 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100079153 | Maloof et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100117660 | Douglas et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100231555 | Mackey | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244809 | Joutsenoja et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244810 | Joutsenoja et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100283755 | Hsih | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110050620 | Hristov | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110109590 | Park | May 2011 | A1 |
20110197333 | Liotta | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110197334 | Liotta | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110197742 | Liotta | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110199333 | Philipp et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120024132 | Wallace et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2007-324088 | Dec 2007 | JP |
10-2007-0032924 | Mar 2007 | KR |
10-2007-007248 | Jul 2007 | KR |
PCTKR2009001610 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2011143260 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2011160038 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012015964 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012116233 | Aug 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Gary Paumen, Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,878, mailed Oct. 16, 2012, USPTO, US. |
Andrew R. Millikin, Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/192,257, mailed Jun. 6, 2012, USPTO, US. |
Jianchun Qin, Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/163,401, mailed Sep. 18, 2012, USPTO, US. |
Novacentrix, “MetalonTMConductiveInksforPrintedElectronics”, http://www.novacentrix.com/images/downloads/InkBrochure2008revb.pdf, Apr. 11, 2009. |
Hwan, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority PCT/US2011/035980, ISA/KR, Republic of Korea. |
Lee, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority PCT/US2011/040913, ISA/KR, Republic of Korea. |
Lee, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority PCT/US2011/045598, ISA/KR, Republic of Korea. |
Kim, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority PCT/US2012/026401, ISA/KR, Republic of Korea. |
Elvin Enad, International Preliminary Report on Patentability (corrected), PCT/US11/40913, Oct. 20, 2012, pp. 1-26, IPEA/USPTO, Alexandria VA, USA. |
Elvin Enad, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US11/45598, Jan. 16, 2013 pp. 1-28, IPEA/USPTO, Alexandria VA, USA. |
Jianchun Qin, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/673,880, Mar. 18, 2013, pp. 1-7, USPTO, Alexandria VA, USA. |
Gary F Pauman, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/668,128, Feb. 21, 2013, pp. 1-6, USPTO, Alexandria VA, USA. |
Thomas Fermentel, Supplemental European Search Report, 11781173.7-1805 / 2569645 PCT/US2011035980, Aug. 14, 2014, EPO, The Hague, Netherlands. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120019475 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |