This application relates to step motor designs that endeavor to reduce detent torque while maintaining holding torque.
A step motor is designed to rotate step-by-step incrementally between discrete stable detent positions defined by electromagnetic interaction between a rotor and those stator poles having energized stator coils. An electrical phase change applying power to a different set of stator coils causes the rotor to “step” to a new detent position. A micro-stepping mode of operation, in which the unequal pull of only partially energized coils causes the rotor to assume intermediate positions between detent positions, allows a full step to be divided into many micro-steps. Step motors are used in a wide variety of applications that require precise motion control.
In the step motor industry, the various design goals (low vibration, smooth quiet operation, fine step resolution, micro-stepping accuracy, small motor size, adequate holding torque, etc.) frequently require tradeoffs in performance such that not all goals can be fully met by any specific motor design. There have been many designs introduced in the motor industry to reduce a motor's un-energized detent torque for smooth operation with low noise and vibration levels. For instance, varying the stator pitch angles is today the most common way to reduce detent torque. Variations of this basic approach are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,910,475 to Lin, U.S. Pat. No. 5,309,051 to Kobori, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,518,270 to Badgerow et al. However, the reduction in detent torque also tends to coincide with a reduction in the energized holding torque.
The magnetic coupling between the stator and the rotor inherently creates a natural detent torque in every hybrid stepper so that it is almost impossible to completely eliminate vibration in the stepping motion. Strong magnetism in the air gap between the rotor and stator makes it very difficult to control magnetic flux solely by the Ampere-turns generated with the stator coils.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,584,495, Kordik describes a step motor designed to provide quicker oscillation damping by means of an electronic back phase damping technique. The rotor comprises a pair of rotor yokes that sandwich an axially polarized rotor magnet. A ring-shaped circumferential zone of the rotor magnet, which would otherwise remain exposed, has windings wound circumferentially around the magnet and connected at opposed ends to form one or more electrically closed loops, forming what is called a “shorted turn” device that improves pull-out torque at a given rotational speed.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,856,714 to Sugiura and U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/0030108 of Trago et al., holding torque is enhanced by inserting permanent magnets in the slots or spaces between the stator teeth (and/or rotor teeth). According to Sugiura, the magnets are arranged in such a manner that the direction of magnetic flux is opposite to that present between the rotor and stator, thereby suppressing leakage magnetic flux. In the Trago published application, to allow for machining of the teeth to a precise diameter and also to allow for a corrosion protective coating, the permanent magnet inserts are set back or sub-flushed by a predetermined depth below the top surface of the teeth.
In U.S. Pat. No. 9,214,849, Lin describes a hybrid step motor in which the rotor need not contain any permanent disk magnet. Rather, a permanent ring magnet is sandwiched in an outer part of the stator winding assembly located far from the gap between rotor and stator teeth so that magnetic flux in the gap is dominated by the energized stator coils. The permanent ring magnet remotely magnetizes the rotor with the magnetic flux passing axially through the ring magnet's interior.
The present invention provides a step motor in which the rotor includes an annular ring of soft magnetic material (such as a medium carbon steel) that radially surrounds a permanent rotor magnet, with this annular ring being axially sandwiched by thin magnetic insulators between a pair of rotor sections. The magnetic insulators may be largely composed of air, except for a set of radially distinct plastic film separator strips. Each magnetic insulator has an axial thickness between two and three times the radial air gap distance between rotor and stator teeth.
Accordingly, having reached an understanding of the magnetic flux behavior in the vicinity of the radial gap between rotor and stator teeth, we have re-designed the rotor construction to allow most of the magnetic flux to accumulate inside the rotor wherever the stator poles are not energized to reduce the detent torque. But the accumulated fluxes should be able to be pulled out through the energized stator pole(s) so that no holding torque will be lost. As a result, the new rotor design for the step motor reduces the un-energized detent torque while not reducing much, if any, of the energized torque (commonly called holding torque).
With reference to
The stator winding assembly 15 includes a stator 21, typically in the form of a laminated stack for ease of machining and assembly. The stator 21 includes a plurality of stator poles 23, each of which is wound with coils 25 that can be selectively driven in a series of phases to magnetically interact 27 with the rotor 13. Each stator pole 25 has a plurality of peripherally spaced, inwardly projecting stator teeth 29 defining a stator inner diameter. The stator teeth 29 magnetically interact with counterpart rotor teeth opposite a gap 39.
As seen in
In the example seen in
The rotor teeth 35 and 36 interact magnetically with stator teeth 29 of energized stator poles 23 on the opposite side of an air gap 39, thereby impelling the rotor 13 to step incrementally from one position to another as the stator coils 25 around the several poles 23 are energized in a specified sequence of drive phases. In the typical prior art rotor assembly, as in
With reference to
With reference to
As seen in
The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) from U.S. provisional application No. 62/823,532 filed on Mar. 25, 2019.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4234808 | Geppart et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4484095 | Neumann | Nov 1984 | A |
4584495 | Kordik | Apr 1986 | A |
4593216 | Willcox | Jun 1986 | A |
4910475 | Lin | Mar 1990 | A |
5068562 | Tagami et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5309051 | Kobori | May 1994 | A |
5856714 | Sugiura | Jan 1999 | A |
6222286 | Watanabe et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
7518270 | Badgerow et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
9214849 | Lin | Dec 2015 | B2 |
10855161 | Lin | Dec 2020 | B2 |
20070120426 | Oiwa | May 2007 | A1 |
20080030108 | Trago et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20110304225 | Terashita | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20130154405 | Trung | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130249331 | Yoshida | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140132092 | Sakamoto | May 2014 | A1 |
20150357894 | Wu | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160079838 | Yoda | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20180269763 | Lin et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200313534 A1 | Oct 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62823532 | Mar 2019 | US |