1. Field of Invention
The present invention relates to a voltage regulator circuit, and more particularly to a low dropout voltage regulator.
2. Description of the Related Art
Low dropout (LDO) voltage regulators are commonly used in power management systems of PC motherboards, laptop computers, mobile phones, and many other products. Power management systems use LDO voltage regulators as local power supplies, where a clean output and a fast transient response are required. LDO voltage regulators enable power management systems to efficiently supply additional voltage levels that are smaller than the main supply voltage. For example, 5V power systems of many PC motherboards use LDO voltage regulators to supply local chipsets with a clean 3.3V signal.
Although LDO voltage regulators do not convert power very efficiently, they are inexpensive, small, and generate very little frequency interference. Furthermore, an LDO voltage regulator can provide a local circuit with a clean voltage that is unaffected by current fluctuations from other areas of the power system. LDO voltage regulators are widely used to supply power to local circuits when the power consumption of the local circuit is negligible with respect to the overall load of the power system.
An ideal LDO voltage regulator should provide a quick and precise DC response to load changes and input transients. Since LDO voltage regulators are widely used in mass-production of computers and mobile phones, for example, a simple design and a low fabrication cost of LDO regulators are also desirable.
A typical LDO voltage regulator includes a feedback-control loop coupled to a pass element. The feedback-control loop modulates a gate voltage of the pass element to control its impedance. Depending on the gate voltage, the pass element supplies different levels of current to an output section of the power supply. The modulation of the gate voltage is done in a manner such that the LDO voltage regulator outputs a steady DC voltage, regardless of loading conditions and input transients.
Referring to
One problem with the conventional LDO circuits described above is that they are prone to be unstable. The output module introduces a pole or a pole-zero pair to the feedback circuit. Unfortunately, the pole or the pole-zero pair is significantly sensitive to operating temperature, and possibly to other factors. If the load impedance varies by a specific amount, an unstable feedback loop may be incurred.
Another problem with the conventional LDO voltage regulators is that a transient response thereof is slow. The slow transient response is resulted from low bandwidth of the compensation feedback loop.
The conventional LDO voltage regulator is prone to unstable because the output impedance is various. Furthermore, performance thereof suffers from slow response. Therefore, an improved LDO voltage regulator with substantially faster transient response adapted to a variety of loads is needed.
The present invention is directed to provide an adaptive compensation scheme for a low dropout (LDO) voltage regulator, for serving a variety of load conditions.
The present invention is directed to provide a LDO voltage regulator serving improved transient response.
According to one aspect of the present invention, an LDO voltage regulator includes an output pass transistor having a source connected to an unregulated DC input terminal, a drain connected to a regulated DC output terminal, and a gate connected to an error amplifier. The error amplifier serves to control the output pass transistor. A bias transistor is coupled from an output of the error amplifier to the gate of the output pass transistor. A compensation network is connected between the gate and the drain of the output pass transistor for compensating the feedback loop. A first slice of the compensation network includes a first capacitor and a first transistor connected to each other in series. A second slice of the compensation network is connected in parallel to the first transistor, wherein the second slice includes a second capacitor and a second transistor connected in series. The compensation network further comprises a distribution network having a plurality of capacitors and transistors connected in parallel to the second transistor.
The compensation network and the bias transistor generate the pole-zero pairs to achieve a maximum 45 degrees phase shift before reaching the crossover frequency in the LDO voltage regulator. Therefore a minimum 45 degrees phase margin is reserved for the feedback loop in various load conditions. According to the present invention, the feedback loop of the LDO voltage regulator is inherently stable and not affected by load conditions. This is preferable because an unpredictable impedance change can be incurred with regarding temperature and applications.
According to another aspect of the present invention, the pole-zero pairs generated in the LDO voltage regulator are adaptively adjusted according to load conditions so that the bandwidth is optimized and a faster transition response is achieved.
Referring to
A mirror current IM is generated from a drain of the mirror transistor 45 in proportion to the output current IO. A control voltage VCTL is supplied from an output of the error amplifier 40. The gate of the output pass transistor 10 is operated with a control voltage VG that is supplied from a drain of a bias transistor 60. A reference voltage VREF is supplied to a negative input of the error amplifier 40. When the output pass transistor 10 is turned on, a voltage at the unregulated DC input terminal VIN will be transmitted from the unregulated DC input terminal VIN to the regulated DC output terminal VOUT. A resistor 31 and a resistor 32 are coupled in series between the regulated DC output terminal VOUT and a reference ground level. A voltage-dividing node FB is located in between the resistor 31 and the resistor 32. A feedback voltage VFB at the voltage-dividing node FB is further supplied to a positive input of the error amplifier 40. A first-mirror current Im1 is generated from a programmable current source 70 in proportion to the mirror current IM. The impedance of the compensation network 50 is determined based on a first-mirror transistor 55 in response to the first-mirror current Im1. A second-mirror current Im2 is generated from a programmable current source 71 in proportion to the mirror current IM. The impedance of the bias transistor 60 is determined based on a second-mirror transistor 65 in response to the second-mirror current Im2.
The compensation network 50 is coupled between the gate and the drain of the output pass transistor 10 for compensating the feedback loop. The compensation network 50 includes a first slice having a first capacitor 80 and a first transistor 90 coupled to each other in series. A second slice of the compensation network 50 is coupled in parallel to the first transistor 90, in which the second slice includes a second capacitor 81 and a second transistor 91 coupled to each other in series. The compensation network 50 further includes a distribution network 52 having a plurality of capacitors and transistors connected in parallel with the second transistor 91. The first capacitor 80 is coupled in between the gate of the output pass transistor 10 and a drain of the first transistor 90. A source of the transistor 90 is coupled to the drain of the output pass transistor 10. Sources of the first-mirror transistor 55, the first transistor 90, the second transistor 91 and transistors in the distribution network 52 are coupled to the regulated DC output terminal VOUT. Gates of the first transistor 90, the second transistors 91, transistors in the distribution network 52, and the first-mirror transistor 55 are connected together. Thus, the impedance of transistors in the distribution network 52 and the impedance of the first transistor 90 and the second transistor 91 are associated with the impedance of the first-mirror transistor 55.
The gate and a drain of the first-mirror transistor 55 are coupled to each other to form a current mirror. The drain of the first-mirror transistor 55 is further coupled to the programmable current source 70. Therefore the impedance of transistors in the distribution network 52 and the impedance of the first transistor 90 and the second transistor 91 are inversely proportional to the output current IO. The drain of the bias transistor 60 is coupled to the gate of the output pass transistor 10. A source of the bias transistor 60 and a source of the second-mirror transistor 65 are coupled to the output of the error amplifier 40. A gate of the bias transistor 60, a gate of the second-mirror transistor 65 and a drain of the second-mirror transistor 65 are coupled to the programmable current source 71. Therefore, the impedance of the bias transistor 60 is inversely proportional to the output current IO.
The feedback loop is formed along the path from the output of the error amplifier 40, the bias transistor 60, the compensation network 50, the output pass transistor 10, the regulated DC output terminal VOUT, and resistors 31, 32 to the positive input of the error amplifier 40. The transfer function of the feedback loop can be expressed as a loop gain, depicted in the following equation:
Where β is a divider ratio of resistors 31 and 32 such as [R32/(R31+R32)]; GAV is the gain of the error amplifier 40; GM is the gain of the output pass transistor 10. The poles P1, P2, . . . , Pn respectively located at the frequency fP1, fP2, . . . , fPn and the zeros Z1, Z2, . . . , Zm respectively located at the frequency fZ1, fZ2, . . . , fZm are produced by the bias transistor 60 and the compensation network 50, where fP1>fZ1>fP2>fZ2> . . . >fPn>fZm.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
It is to be understood that the term transistor can refer to devices including MOSFET, PMOS, and NMOS transistors. Furthermore, the term transistor can refer to any array of transistor devices arranged to act as a single transistor.
Although the invention has been described with reference to a particular embodiment thereof, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that modifications to the described embodiment may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention will be defined by the attached claims and not by the above detailed description.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6300749 | Castelli et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6975099 | Wu et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
20030218450 | Bonte | Nov 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050242796 A1 | Nov 2005 | US |