This invention relates generally to gas turbine engines, and more particularly to shrouds made of a low-ductility material in the turbine sections of such engines.
A typical gas turbine engine includes a turbomachinery core having a high pressure compressor, a combustor, and a high pressure turbine in serial flow relationship. The core is operable in a known manner to generate a primary gas flow. The high pressure turbine (also referred to as a gas generator turbine) includes one or more rotors which extract energy from the primary gas flow. Each rotor comprises an annular array of blades or buckets carried by a rotating disk. The flowpath through the rotor is defined in part by a shroud, which is a stationary structure which circumscribes the tips of the blades or buckets. These components operate in an extremely high temperature environment, and must be cooled by air flow to ensure adequate service life. Typically, the air used for cooling is extracted (bled) from the compressor. Bleed air usage negatively impacts specific fuel consumption (“SFC”) and should generally be minimized.
It has been proposed to replace metallic shroud structures with materials having better high-temperature capabilities, such as ceramic matrix composites (CMCs). These materials have unique mechanical properties that must be considered during design and application of an article such as a shroud segment. For example, CMC materials have relatively low tensile ductility or low strain to failure when compared with metallic materials. Also, CMCs have a coefficient of thermal expansion (“CTE”) in the range of about 1.5-5 microinch/inch/degree F., significantly different from commercial metal alloys used as supports for metallic shrouds. Such metal alloys typically have a CTE in the range of about 7-10 microinch/inch/degree F.
CMC materials are comprised of a laminate of a matrix material and reinforcing fibers and are orthotropic to at least some degree. The matrix, or non-primary fiber direction, herein referred to as interlaminar, is typically weaker (i.e. 1/10 or less) than the fiber direction of a composite material system and can be the limiting design factor.
Shroud structures are subject to interlaminar tensile stress imparted at the junctions between their walls, which must be carried in the weaker matrix material. These interlaminar tensile stresses can be the limiting stress location in the shroud design.
Accordingly, there is a need for a composite shroud structure with reduced interlaminar stresses.
This need is addressed by the present invention, which provides a shroud segment configured so as to minimize interlaminar stresses therein.
According to one aspect of the invention, a shroud segment is provided for a gas turbine engine, the shroud segment constructed from a composite material including reinforcing fibers embedded in a matrix, and having a cross-sectional shape defined by opposed forward and aft walls, and opposed inner and outer walls, the walls extending between opposed first and second end faces, wherein the inner wall defines an arcuate inner flowpath surface; and wherein a compound fillet is disposed at a junction between first and second ones of the walls, the compound fillet including first and second portions, the second portion having a concave curvature extending into the first one of the walls.
According to another aspect of the invention, a shroud apparatus for a gas turbine engine includes: an annular metallic hanger; a shroud segment disposed inboard of the hanger, the shroud segment constructed from a composite material including reinforcing fibers embedded in a matrix, and having a cross-sectional shape defined by opposed forward and aft walls, and opposed inner and outer walls, the walls extending between opposed first and second end faces, wherein the inner wall defines an arcuate inner flowpath surface; and wherein a compound fillet is disposed at a junction between first and second ones of the walls, the compound fillet including first and second portions, the second portion having a concave curvature extending into the first one of the walls; and a retainer mechanically coupled to the hanger which engages the shroud segment to retain the shroud segment to the hanger while permitting movement of the shroud segment in a radial direction.
The invention may be best understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing figures in which:
Referring to the drawings wherein identical reference numerals denote the same elements throughout the various views,
The principles described herein are equally applicable to turbofan, turbojet and turboshaft engines, as well as turbine engines used for other vehicles or in stationary applications. Furthermore, while a turbine shroud is used as an example, the principles of the present invention are applicable to any low-ductility flowpath component which is at least partially exposed to a primary combustion gas flowpath of a gas turbine engine.
The turbine includes a stationary nozzle 10. It may be of unitary or built-up construction and includes a plurality of airfoil-shaped stationary turbine vanes 12 circumscribed by an annular outer band 14. The outer band 14 defines the outer radial boundary of the gas flow through the turbine nozzle 10. It may be a continuous annular element or it may be segmented.
Downstream of the nozzle 10, there is a rotor disk (not shown) that rotates about a centerline axis of the engine and carries an array of airfoil-shaped turbine blades 16. A shroud comprising a plurality of arcuate shroud segments 18 is arranged so as to encircle and closely surround the turbine blades 16 and thereby define the outer radial flowpath boundary for the hot gas stream flowing through the turbine blades 16.
Downstream of the turbine blades 16, there is a downstream stationary nozzle 17. It may be of unitary or built-up construction and includes a plurality of airfoil-shaped stationary turbine vanes 19 circumscribed by an annular outer band 21. The outer band 21 defines the outer radial boundary of the gas flow through the turbine nozzle 17. It may be a continuous annular element or it may be segmented.
As seen in
The shroud segments 18 are constructed from a ceramic matrix composite (CMC) material of a known type. Generally, commercially available CMC materials include a ceramic type fiber for example SiC, forms of which are coated with a compliant material such as Boron Nitride (BN). The fibers are carried in a ceramic type matrix, one form of which is Silicon Carbide (SiC). Typically, CMC type materials have a room temperature tensile ductility of no greater than about 1%, herein used to define and mean a low tensile ductility material. Generally CMC type materials have a room temperature tensile ductility in the range of about 0.4 to about 0.7%. This is compared with metals having a room temperature tensile ductility of at least about 5%, for example in the range of about 5 to about 15%. The shroud segments 18 could also be constructed from other low-ductility, high-temperature-capable materials.
CMC materials are orthotropic to at least some degree, i.e. the material's tensile strength in the direction parallel to the length of the fibers (the “fiber direction”) is stronger than the tensile strength in the perpendicular direction (the “matrix”, “interlaminar”, or “secondary” or “tertiary” fiber direction). Physical properties such as modulus and Poisson's ratio also differ between the fiber and matrix directions.
The flowpath surface 30 of the shroud segment 18 may incorporate a layer of environmental barrier coating (“EBC”), which may be an abradable material, and/or a rub-tolerant material of a known type suitable for use with CMC materials. This layer is sometimes referred to as a “rub coat”, designated at 38. As used herein, the term “abradable” implies that the rub coat 38 is capable of being abraded, ground, or eroded away during contact with the tips of the turbine blades 16 as they turn inside the shroud segments 18 at high speed, with little or no resulting damage to the turbine blade tips. This abradable property may be a result of the material composition of the rub coat 38, by its physical configuration, or by some combination thereof. The rub coat 38 may comprise a ceramic layer, such as yttria stabilized zirconia or barium strontium aluminosilicate. Exemplary compositions and methods suitable for making the rub coat 38 are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,565 (Johnson et al.), which is incorporated herein by reference.
The shroud segments 18 include opposed end faces 42 (also commonly referred to as “slash” faces). The end faces 42 may lie in a plane parallel to the centerline axis of the engine, referred to as a “radial plane”, or they may be slightly offset from the radial plane, or they may be oriented so that they are at an acute angle to such a radial plane. When assembled into a complete ring, end gaps are present between the end faces 42 of adjacent shroud segments 18. One or more seals (not shown) may be provided at the end faces 42. Similar seals are generally known as “spline seals” and take the form of thin strips of metal or other suitable material which are inserted in slots in the end faces 42. The spline seals span the gaps between shroud segments 18.
As best seen in
At the junction of the first portion 119A and the interior surface of the aft wall 126, there is a first transition surface 138, which is illustrated as a smooth concave curve. Other configurations which could produce similar results include straight lines or spline shapes.
A second transition portion 140 is disposed at the junction of the second portion 119B and the interior surface of the inner wall 120, which is illustrated as a smooth convex curve. Other configurations which could produce similar results include straight lines or spline shapes.
The profile of the compound fillet 119 is shaped so as to be compatible with composite materials. The reinforcing fibers within the component generally follow the contours of (i.e. are parallel to) the bounding surfaces of the interior wall 120, the compound fillet 119, and the aft wall 126. These surfaces are contoured such that the fibers will not buckle or wrinkle where outward cusps are located. While the profile of the compound fillet 119 has been illustrated in an exemplary two-dimensional sectional view, it is noted that the actual shape may be different at different sections.
In the illustrated example, the thickness of the inner wall 120 is at a minimum at the location of the second portion 119B of the compound fillet 119. The exact shapes and dimensions of the compound fillet 119 may be altered to suit a particular application and the specific composite material used.
The compound fillet 119 has been illustrated disposed between the aft wall 126 and the forward wall 120. It is noted that the same or similar configuration may be implemented at the junctions between any or all of the walls 120, 122, 124, and 126.
The shroud segments 18 are mounted to a stationary metallic engine structure, shown in
As best seen in
The hangers 46 are installed into the turbine case 44 as follows. The forward hook 58 is received by an axially-forward facing forward rail 72 of the case 44. The aft hook 62 is received by an axially-forward facing aft rail 74 of the case 44. An anti-rotation pin 76 or other similar anti-rotation feature is received in the forward rail 72 and extends into a mating slot (not shown) in the forward hook 58.
The construction of the retainers 48 is shown in more detail in
The retainer 48 is positioned in the shroud cavity 28 with the central portion 78 and the clamping surface 84 exposed through the mounting hole 27 in the outer wall 22. The retainer 48 is clamped against a boss 90 of the hanger 46 by the bolt 50 or other suitable fastener, and a spring 92 is clamped between the boss 90 and the clamping surface. Each spring 92 includes a center section with a mounting hole, and opposed laterally-extending arms 94.
The relative dimensions of the boss 90, the retainer 48, and the shroud segment 18 are selected such that the retainers 48 limit the inboard movement of the shroud segments 18, but do not clamp the shroud segments 18 against the hanger 46 in the radial direction. In other words, the retainers 48 permit a definite clearance for movement in the radially outboard direction. In operation, the prevailing gas pressure load in the secondary flowpath urges the shroud segment 18 radially inboard against the retainer 48, while the retainer 48 deflects a small amount.
The springs 92 function to hold the shroud segments 18 radially inboard against the retainers 48 during assembly and for an initial grinding process to circularize the ring of shroud segments 18. However, the springs 92 are sized such that they do not exert a substantial clamping load on the shroud segments 18.
In the axial direction, the aft inner leg 68 of the hanger 46 acts as a large cantilevered spring to counteract air pressure loads in operation. This spring action urges the forward wall 24 of the shroud segment 18 against the forward bearing surface 66 of the forward inner leg 64, resulting in a positive seal between the metallic hanger 46 and the CMC shroud segments, thereby decreasing cooling flow leakage.
In the installed condition, the forward and aft overhangs 32 and 34 are disposed in axially close proximity or in axially overlapping relationship with the components forward and aft of the shroud segment 18. In the illustrated example, there is an overlapping configuration between the aft overhang 34 and the aft nozzle band 21, while the forward overhang 32 lies in close proximity to the forward outer band 14. This configuration minimizes leakage between the components and discourages hot gas ingestion from the primary flowpath to the secondary flowpath.
As noted above, the mounting slot 27 passes through the outer wall 22, the transition wall 29, and the forward wall 24. The shroud segments 18 thus incorporate a substantial amount of open area. There is not an air seal present between the perimeter of the mounting slot 27 and the hanger 46, and the shroud segments 18 do not, in and of themselves, function as plenums. Rather, the shroud segments 18 form a plenum in cooperation with the hangers 46, indicated generally at “P” in
A hollow metallic impingement baffle 96 is disposed inside each shroud segment 18. The impingement baffle 96 fits closely to the retainer 48. The inboard wall of the impingement baffle has a number of impingement holes 98 formed therein, which direct coolant at the segment 18. The interior of the impingement baffle 96 communicates with the coolant feed passage 71 through a transfer passage 73 formed in the retainer 48.
In operation, air flows through passage 71, transfer passage 73, baffle 96, impingement holes 98, and pressurizes the plenum P. Spent cooling air from the plenum P exits through purge holes 100 formed in the forward wall 24 of the shroud segment 18.
The shroud mounting apparatus described above is effective to mount a low-ductility shroud in a turbine engine without applying clamping loads directly thereto, and has several advantages compared to the prior art.
In particular, the tapered edge (or wedge) shape on the forward side of the shroud allows the shroud mounting system to carry loads from forward of the shroud segments 18 to the turbine case 44 without transmitting directly through the shroud segments 18. By redirecting the load around the shroud segments 18, the stress in the shroud segments 18 remains relatively low.
Furthermore, the overhangs 32 and 34 allow the shroud segments 18 to protect the supporting structure close to the flowpath while discouraging hot gas ingestion through the use of overlaps between the shroud segments 18 and the axially adjacent nozzles. This overlapping configuration requires less cooling flow to purge the shroud-to-nozzle cavities, thereby improving overall engine performance. As the shroud material has better high temperature capability and lower stress than the adjacent nozzles, the use of the overhangs 32 and 34 provides an overall turbine life improvement.
Finally, the incorporation of the compound fillet 119 allows the interlaminar stress at the shroud segment wall intersections to be distributed over a larger area, thus reducing the peak interlaminar tensile stress value. Analysis has shown that the configuration described above can lower the peak interlaminar tensile stress by a significant amount, for example about 50% as compared to the configuration without the compound fillet, without significant changes to the primary in-plane (or fiber direction) stress.
The foregoing has described a turbine shroud apparatus for a gas turbine engine. While specific embodiments of the present invention have been described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications thereto can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the invention and the best mode for practicing the invention are provided for the purpose of illustration only and not for the purpose of limitation.
This application is a Continuation-In-Part of application Ser. No. 13/327,349, filed Dec. 15, 2011, which is currently pending.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3583824 | Smuland et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
4087199 | Hemsworth et al. | May 1978 | A |
5074748 | Hagle | Dec 1991 | A |
5154577 | Kellock et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5188507 | Sweeney | Feb 1993 | A |
5655876 | Rock et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
6290459 | Correia | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6340285 | Gonyou et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6413042 | Correia | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6503051 | Predmore | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6702550 | Darkins et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7011493 | Marchi et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7270518 | Barb et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7278820 | Keller | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7563071 | Campbell et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7595114 | Meschter et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7686577 | Morrison et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7749565 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7910172 | Meschter et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7950234 | Radonovich et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7968217 | Sarrafi-Nour et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8047773 | Bruce et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20030202876 | Jasklowski et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040062640 | Darkins, Jr. et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050129499 | Morris et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20080206046 | Razzell et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20110182720 | Kojima et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110274538 | Shi et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110318171 | Albers et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20130017057 | Lagueux | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2740538 | Nov 2011 | CA |
101372902 | Feb 2009 | CN |
1965030 | Sep 2008 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Marusko, et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/790,209, filed May 28, 2010. |
Dziech et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/895,007, filed Sep. 30, 2010. |
Albers et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/915,424, filed Oct. 29, 2010. |
Albers et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,082, filed Dec. 30, 2010. |
Albers et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,105, filed Dec. 30, 2010. |
Albers et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/173,897, filed Jun. 30, 2011. |
Non-Final Rejection towards corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,349 dated Jul. 22, 2014. |
Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with corresponding CN Application No. 201210541477.1 on May 12, 2015. |
Unofficial English translation of Chinese Office Action issued in connection with corresponding CN Application No. 2012105414771 on May 12, 2015. |
Unofficial English Translation of Chinese Office Action issued in connection with corresponding CN Application No. 201310056712.0 on Jun. 19, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130156556 A1 | Jun 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13327349 | Dec 2011 | US |
Child | 13402616 | US |