This invention relates to a device that improves wireline cable performance during logging operations in a variety of boreholes. The use of low friction wireline standoffs ameliorates the effects of wireline cable differential sticking, wireline cable key-seating, and high cable drags by reducing or eliminating the contact of the wireline cable with the borehole wall during the logging operation.
Wireline logging is a common operation in the oil industry whereby down-hole electrical tools are conveyed on wireline (also known as “e-line” in industry parlance) to evaluate formation lithologies and fluid types in a variety of boreholes. In certain wells there is a risk of the wireline cable and/or logging tools becoming stuck in the open hole due to differential sticking or key-seating, as explained below.
Key-seating happens when the wireline cable cuts a groove into the borehole wall. This can happen in deviated or directional wells where the wireline cable may exert considerable sideways pressure at the contact points with the borehole. Since the logging tool diameter is generally much bigger than the groove cut by the wireline cable a keyseat can terminate normal ascent out of the borehole and result in a fishing job or lost tools in hole.
Differential sticking can occur when there is an overbalance between hydrostatic and formation pressures in the borehole; the severity of differential sticking is related to:
This invention ameliorates the effects of differential sticking and key-seating of the wireline cable by reducing or eliminating direct contact of the cable to the borehole wall. This is achieved by clamping an array of low friction wireline standoffs onto the wireline cable, resulting in a lower contact area per unit length of open hole, lower applied sideways pressure of the wireline against the borehole wall, and lower cable drag when conveying the wireline in or out of the hole. The use of low area standoffs also enables more efficient use of wireline jars in the logging string since they reduce the cable friction above the jars, allowing firing at lower surface tensions and easier re-rocking of the jars in boreholes where high cable drag is a problem (absorbing the applied surface tension before it can reach the wireline cable head and jars).
The features and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. While numerous changes may be made by those skilled in the art, such changes are within the spirit of the invention.
These drawings illustrate certain aspects of the present invention and should not be used to limit or define the invention.
An array of low friction wireline standoffs can be installed on the wireline cable to minimize the wireline cable contact over a selected zone(s) of the open hole section. The low friction wireline standoffs may be installed on the wireline cable to either straddle known permeable zones where differential sticking is a risk (e.g., eliminating cable contact 100%) or they can be placed at regular intervals along the wireline cable to minimize key-seating, taking into account the dog leg severity of the borehole. The higher the dogleg severity the shorter the recommended spacing between wireline standoffs installed on the wireline cable. The spacing of wireline standoffs on the cable may be from 10's of feet to 100's of feet, depending on the requirements for the particular borehole being logged.
In accordance with present embodiments, each low friction wireline standoff comprises two opposing assemblies which mate together onto the wireline cable. In an embodiment, the opposing assemblies clamp together on the wireline cable with four cap head bolts. The assemblies comprise two stainless steel half shells with exterior wheels and two disposable cable inserts on the interior. In one embodiment, the assemblies comprise twelve exterior wheels. In an exemplary embodiment, contact with the wireline cable exterior is solely with the cable inserts made from aluminum, and not the stainless steel half shells. In one embodiment, the cable inserts are designed to slightly deform around the outer wireline cable armour during installation without physically damaging the wireline cable. There are a large range of cable inserts available to fit the wireline cable, taking into account any manufacturing tolerances and varying degrees of wear or distortion along the length of the wireline cable. Therefore, for an array of low area standoffs installed on the wireline cable a range of different cable inserts may be employed to ensure a fit which does not allow slippage along the wireline cable or damage to the wireline cable when clamped. The four cap head bolts that clamp the two assemblies together are torqued to a consistently safe limit with a calibrated torque wrench.
In certain embodiments, the stainless steel half shells are vacuum hardened for improved wear resistance during use and a range of shell sizes are available for installation on the wireline, for example, from 50 mm O.D. upwards. The aluminum cable inserts are positively secured into each stainless half shell by small cap head bolts that pass through the outside of each half shell into tapped holes in the cable insert bodies. The cable inserts have zero freedom of movement inside the half shells because:
The low friction wireline standoff may further include a plurality of fins along its length. In an embodiment, the low friction wireline standoff has 12 fins cut along its length, each fin holding a wheel sub assembly. The wheels rotate in plain bearings machined in the bodies of the half shells and are clamped in position with slotted wheel retainers and cap head bolts. The wheels reduce the standoff rolling resistance which results in lower tensions and cable drags inside casing and the open borehole.
The wheels also minimize contact area of the standoff assemblies with the borehole wall and reduce the differential sticking force acted upon each wheel at the contact points with the borehole. They also allow easy rotation of the standoffs if the wireline cable rotates when it is deployed and retrieved from the borehole. Note that it is the general nature of wireline logging cable to rotate during logging operations due to the opposing lay angles of the inner and outer armours which can induce unequal torsional forces when tensions are applied. The design of the shells and wheels allows easy rotation of the wireline cable during the logging operation, avoiding the potential for damage if excessive torque was allowed to build up.
In addition, the low friction wireline standoff may further include a plurality of holes in the half shells for use in installation. In an embodiment, four holes in the standoff half shells are used to connect a lanyard during installation, to avoid dropped objects on the drill floor during installation on the wireline cable.
In accordance with certain embodiments, the maximum external diameter of the low friction wireline standoff is less than the size of overshot and drill pipe i.d. during fishing operations. In the event of a fishing job, the array of low area standoffs will safely fit inside the fishing assembly provided by the Operator, enabling the wireline cable head or tool body to be successfully engaged by the fishing overshot. The wireline cable and low friction wireline standoff array may then be safely pulled through the drill pipe all the way to surface when the cable head is released from the logging string.
The invention will now be described in detail with the aid of
The low friction wireline standoff 1 as seen in
As depicted in
a show the low friction wireline standoff with the lower half shell 2 removed such that the upper half shell 2 with cable insert in-situ 3 can be viewed. Included is a semi-exploded view of a single wheel sub assembly that illustrates the wheel and axle 7 and slotted wheel retainer 8, with pair of cap head bolts 9 to hold them in the half shell 2. In
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations may be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1013292 | Aug 2010 | GB | national |
The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/872,957 filed May 12, 2020 that claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 16/102,389 filed Aug. 13, 2018 that claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 14/959,525 filed Dec. 4, 2015 that claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 12/871,218 filed Aug. 30, 2010 that claims priority to United Kingdom Patent Application No. GB1013292.6, entitled “Low Friction Wireline Standoff,” filed on Aug. 7, 2010, the entire disclosure of each are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
484947 | Black | Oct 1892 | A |
712901 | Black | Nov 1902 | A |
1860659 | Criley | May 1932 | A |
1913365 | Bailey | Jun 1933 | A |
2960709 | Parker et al. | Nov 1960 | A |
3125382 | Herndon, Jr. et al. | Mar 1964 | A |
3545825 | Hamilton | Dec 1970 | A |
3692109 | Grayson | Sep 1972 | A |
3939570 | Loftus | Feb 1976 | A |
4187919 | Lambot | Feb 1980 | A |
4372622 | Cheek | Feb 1983 | A |
4431963 | Walkow | Feb 1984 | A |
4804906 | Hamberg et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
5522467 | Stevens | Jun 1996 | A |
5692562 | Squires | Dec 1997 | A |
5692563 | Krueger | Dec 1997 | A |
6209667 | Murray et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6250394 | Mashburn | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250406 | Luke | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260617 | Baugh et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6382333 | Murray | May 2002 | B1 |
6457532 | Simpson | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6684965 | Bakke | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6779598 | Hall | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7048064 | Smith | May 2006 | B1 |
7144243 | Stephenson et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7188689 | Maxwell et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7395881 | McKay et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7403000 | Barolak et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7866384 | Hall | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8245779 | Lemke et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8733455 | Shaikh et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8919436 | Wheater et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9234394 | Wheater et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
20010020530 | Eaton | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020020526 | Male et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030106696 | Lauritzen et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050098353 | Maxwell et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050252655 | McKay | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20120018145 | Wheater et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120255744 | Shaikh et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130248206 | Jordan et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1062154 | Sep 1979 | CA |
2393984 | Apr 2004 | GB |
2450918 | Jan 2009 | GB |
Entry |
---|
UK Intellectual Property Office Search Report for Application No. GB0713550.2 dated Mar. 12, 2008. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/871,218 dated Dec. 17, 2014. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/871,218 dated Oct. 23, 2013. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/871,218 dated May 21, 2012. |
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/871,218 dated Apr. 6, 2015. |
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/871,218 dated Mar. 24, 2014. |
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/871,218 dated Aug. 30, 2012. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/871,218 dated Sep. 4, 2015. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/959,525 dated Aug. 28, 2017. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/959,525 dated Oct. 6, 2016. |
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/959,525 dated Jan. 5, 2018. |
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/959,525 dated May 3, 2017. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/959,525 dated May 1, 2018. |
USPTO Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 14/959,525 dated Aug. 21, 2018. |
USPTO Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 12/871,218 dated Dec. 22, 2015. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/102,389 dated Jan. 13, 2020. |
USPTO Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 16/102,389 dated Apr. 22, 2020. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/872,957 dated Feb. 23, 2021. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/872,957 dated Oct. 9, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220018194 A1 | Jan 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16872957 | May 2020 | US |
Child | 17490078 | US | |
Parent | 16102389 | Aug 2018 | US |
Child | 16872957 | US | |
Parent | 14959525 | Dec 2015 | US |
Child | 16102389 | US | |
Parent | 12871218 | Aug 2010 | US |
Child | 14959525 | US |