Low Glare Rear-View Mirror for Vehicles

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20080212188
  • Publication Number
    20080212188
  • Date Filed
    May 12, 2005
    19 years ago
  • Date Published
    September 04, 2008
    16 years ago
Abstract
A low-glare motor-vehicle includes a color reproduction index Ra of at least 70 and a reduced reflection for each of the illuminants A and C in scotopic vision (at night) as compared with photopic vision (in the daylight) by at least 3%. In one embodiment, the mirror consists of a transparent substrate, a thin transparent metallic layer, an adapted dielectric layer and the reflector properly speaking.
Description

The present invention relates to a rearview mirror for vehicles, in particular for motor vehicles or the like, with a transparent layer carrier, preferably consisting of soda-lime glass, and a coating on the front and/or rear side made from dielectric and metallic materials, the mirror having a low glaring effect due to its reflectance, in particular at night.


BACKGROUND

Typical known coatings for automobile mirrors consist of the highly reflecting metals silver and aluminium. The reflection values achievable amount to more than 85% in the visible light spectrum. Although, however, high reflection values are desirable in the daylight, they lead at night to a glaring of the driver through the headlights of the following vehicles. Therefore, mirror coatings were developed in the past, which are destined to reduce the glaring effect when driving at night.


One possibility of reducing the glare is the use of alternative reflector materials, such as chromium or titanium chromium (double-layer system of chromium on titanium, see DE 197 390 46). With this, mirrors with a neutral reflection and a reduced reflectance of approx. 45% to 60% can be realized. A further reduction is impossible at present, due to statutory provisions, which prescribe a minimum reflection of 40% in the daylight.


Afterwards, it was tried to improve the behavior of the mirrors through spectrally selective reflection coatings. EP 0 176 935 B1, for examples, describes a blue rearview mirror with reduced reflection in the green to red spectral region. This is based on the assumption that such mirrors have a low glaring effect at night, because the spectral composition of the light of the headlights usual at the moment of application of the patent EP 0 176 935 B1 had a high red contribution and a low blue contribution, so that such blue mirrors additionally diminished the (glaring) light of these headlights.


To evaluate the spectral properties of the mirror coatings, one must in general take into account that the response of the human eye differs greatly within the visible spectral region. This is represented by the so-called response characteristic V(λ), λ designating the wavelength of the light. V(λ) is valid, however, only for the bright adaptation of the eye. With decreasing brightness of the environment, this characteristic shifts towards shorter wavelengths up to the dark-adapted response characteristic V′(λ).


Therefore, another approach for the development of low-glare mirrors were mirrors which, at a relatively high level of spectral reflectance, reduced in particular the region of the highest eye responsiveness at wavelengths of approx. 550 nm (U.S. Pat. No. 4,921,331, U.S. Pat. No. 4,805,989 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,955,705).


With an alternative technology to be mentioned here, one tried to reduce the risk of glaring through the headlights of following vehicles by means of the fact that the mirror structure contains parts of variable transmission, switched, e.g., electrically (e.g. electrochromic mirrors or LCD mirrors). The before-mentioned technologies involve, however, a high expenditure. They require in particular measures of circuit technology to ensure that the low reflection values achievable with them are only effective in concrete cases of acute glare. Accordingly, only vehicles from the top segment are equipped with them at present.


Another important variable for evaluation is the so-called color reproduction index Ra, following the standard DIN EN 410, which is a measure for the manner in which colors can be reproduced or distinguished in the reflected mirror image. The color reproduction index is relevant in particular for visual recognition of the road traffic happenings. Briefly, systems with neutral reflection have a good color reproduction (Ra almost 100), while the color reproduction index of intensely colored mirrors is clearly reduced. This limits in practice the influencing of the glare behavior by means of the mirror spectrum.


The optimum reduction of glare is made even more difficult through the fact that meanwhile other light sources to be used in motor-vehicle headlights were developed, which spectrally differ clearly from the known light sources (halogen headlights) and which complicate the relations.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved rearview mirror with a clear reduction of the glaring through following vehicles (with different headlight structures), in particular in the darkness, and a color reproduction index Ra on at least the order of the known blue-shade mirrors (Ra=74).


that the present invention provides a rearview mirror wherein the reflection layer has a spectral reflection behavior showing at night a relative reduction of the reflection values of illuminants A and C by at least 3%, preferably by at least 5%, particularly preferably by at least 10%, as compared with the bright-adapted. The color reproduction index is in this case at least 70.


Advantageous embodiments of the invention are the subject matter of the claims.


In particular, the coating is located advantageously on the side of the layer carrier which is facing away from the viewer. In an alternative or additional advantageous development, the coating comprises, in the order of their deposition, a transparent metallic layer, a dielectric layer and a metallic reflecting layer, the transparent metallic layer preferably consisting of NiCr and having a thickness of 1 to 21 nm. The dielectric layer preferably consists of TiO2, SiO2 or SnO2.


Particularly good results can be achieved by designing the optical properties of the rearview mirror according to a so-called design wavelength, which is particularly well adapted to the response characteristic of the eye, both for photopic and for scotopic vision. A wavelength of approx. 530 nm was chosen as a particularly well suited design wavelength, corresponding to an intermediate value between the maxima of the response characteristic for photopic vision, on the one hand, and for scotopic vision, on the other hand. To guarantee a particularly well suited adaptation of the layer system to this design wavelength, the layer thicknesses, in particular the so-called optical-layer thickness, i.e. the product of actual layer thickness and refractive index, of the dielectric layer are preferably chosen in a suitable manner. Preferably, the optical thickness do of the dielectric layer is chosen as a function of its refractive index n530, with the design wavelength being 530 nm, in such a way that it lies within a range which is considered as particularly well suited. This range is limited for a refractive index n530 of maximally 1.99, as the lower limit, by the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.46, do=235 nm) and (n530=1.99, do=216 nm), preferably by the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.46, do=244 nm) and (n530=1.99, do=233 nm), and as the upper limit, by the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.46, do=362 nm) and (n530=1.99, do=353 nm), preferably by the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.46, do=335 nm) and (n530=1.99, do=330 nm). For a refractive index n530 of at least 1.99, however, the range considered as preferable is limited, as the lower limit, by the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.99, do=216 nm) and (n530=2.48, do=205 nm), preferably by the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.99, do=233 nm) and (n530=2.48, do=225 nm), and as the upper limit by the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.99, do=353 nm) and (n530=2.48, do=340 nm), preferably by the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.99, do=330 nm) and (n530=2.48, do=319 nm).


By choosing these parameters, it is guaranteed that the dielectric layer has an optical thickness of 235 nm to 362 nm, preferably of 244 to 335 nm, if its refractive index amounts to 1.45 at 530 nm, whereas the dielectric layer has an optical thickness of 216 nm to 353 nm, preferably of 233 to 330 nm, if its refractive index amounts to 1.99 at 530 nm, and an optical thickness of 205 nm to 340 nm, preferably of 225 to 319 nm, if its refractive index amounts to 2.45 at 530 nm. In the intermediate range between these refractive indices, the dielectric layer has an optical thickness in a range which results from linear interpolation due to its refractive index at 530 nm, lying in the interval of 1.46 to 1.99 or in the interval of 1.99 to 2.48.


In conventional rearview mirrors, usually silver (Ag) is used as reflector material. This usually requires, however, expensive anticorrosive measures, for example the application of protective varnish or the like, in order to guarantee a reliable reflection effect under all conditions of application. On the one hand, for reasons of cost and, on the other hand, for reasons of environmental protection, in particular in view of the materials used in such protective varnishes, it is, therefore, desirable to provide alternative materials for the reflecting layer. This is, however, not easily possible, in view of the optical properties provided by the design, in particular for safeguarding the required reflection values. Surprisingly, it turned out, however, that these design targets, i.e. observation of particularly advantageous optical properties when using alternative reflector materials, can be achieved by arranging, in a particularly advantageous embodiment, a further dielectric layer in the manner of an additional layer between the dielectric layer provided anyhow and the reflecting layer. This additional layer has in a further advantageous embodiment a reduced refractive index as compared with the dielectric layer.


Advantageously, the additional dielectric layer consists of SiO2 or MgF2, or, if the refraction of the dielectric layer is high enough, of SnO2.


In this multilayer system, too, the set of characteristic parameters, i.e. the combination of layer thicknesses, is preferably chosen in such a suitable way that an adaptation to a design wavelength, preferably of approx. 530 nm, is effected. This is achieved by the fact that the sum of the optical-layer thicknesses of the dielectric layer and the additional layer is at least 250 nm, preferably at least 275 nm, and maximally 390 nm, preferably maximally 375 nm. With that, the total optical-layer thickness given through the dielectric double layer lies within a band of a certain bandwidth above and around half the design wavelength. In an alternative advantageous embodiment, the sum of the optical-layer thicknesses of the dielectric layer and the additional layer is at least 530 nm, preferably at least 560 nm, and maximally 670 nm, preferably maximally 635 nm.


The multilayer structure of the dielectric enables the use of alternative reflector materials. Advantageously, the reflecting layer consists of aluminium (Al), nickel (Ni), titanium (Ti), chromium (Cr) or of an alloy of these materials, but preferably of Cr.


The coating is advantageously applied on the rear side of the layer carrier, so that it is protected by the layer carrier against damage or other detrimental effects from the exterior. In another advantageous embodiment, the front of the layer carrier is provided with a hydrophilic and/or a photocatalytically active coating, which prevents an undesired fogging-up in a manner known in itself.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention is illustrated by the following drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 shows the spectral course of a halogen lamp (illuminant A), of daylight (illuminant C), of a high-pressure discharge lamp and of a white LED;



FIG. 2 shows the photopic and scotopic response characteristic;



FIG. 3 shows the reflection curves of known blue-shade or neutral-shade mirrors;



FIG. 4 and FIG. 5 show the reflection curves of known color mirrors (U.S. Pat. No. 4,955,705 and WO0241049);



FIG. 6 shows the layer structure of the color mirror according to the exemplary embodiments; and



FIG. 7 to FIG. 10 show the reflection curves of embodiments according to the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 shows the development of the spectra of different light sources in the past. While up to recent times, only the illuminants C (daylight) and A (at night) were relevant, the spectral conditions for driving at night have become more complex due to the development of new light sources (discharge lamp HID and white light-emitting diodes LED). In FIG. 1, the spectra are designated with (a) illuminant A, (b) illuminant C, (c) discharge lamp, and (d) white light-emitting diode.



FIG. 2 illustrates that the human eye is first of all highly responsive within a narrow range only and that, therefore, this range is mainly relevant for examinations concerning the glare. It can also be seen that the response characteristic of scotopic vision (at night) shifts towards shorter wavelengths. The response characteristics (e) “photopic vision” and (f) “scotopic vision” correspond to the standard CIE 1951.


Table 1 represents the characteristic optical data of known mirror systems and systems according to the present invention.














TABLE 1









Layer system
Photopic
Scotopic














Variant/l
Absorber
Intermediate layer
Additional layer
Reflection
Reflection


























Reflector

ds

ds
Do

ds
do
A
C
LED
HID
A
C
LED
HID
Ra
M*


material
Mat.
[nm]
Mat.
[nm]
[nm]
Mat
[nm]
[nm]
[%]
[%]
[%]
[%]
[%]
[%]
[%]
[%]
[%]
[%]




























Chromium 2








57
57
57
57
58
58
58
58
97
102


Titanium








46
46
46
46
45
45
45
45
99
98


chromium 2


TEREF
NiCr
3.4
SnO2
82
164



49
53
52
51
64
68
66
66
74
130


Example 1/Ag
NiCr
3.2
SiO2
248
362



40
37
37
38
34
36
37
37
75
97


Example 2/Ag
NiCr
2.8
SiO2
240
351



47
44
44
45
38
39
40
40
75
88


Example 3/Ag
NiCr
2.4
SiO2
226
330



59
55
55
56
46
44
45
45
75
80


Example 4/Ag
NiCr
3.15
SiO2
197
288



74
70
71
72
55
49
52
51
75
74


Example 5/Ag
NiCr
10.6
SiO2
172
251



76
73
77
77
58
49
54
52
79
76


Example 6/Ag
NiCr
13.6
SiO2
165
240



73
73
76
75
63
54
58
57
75
86


Example 7/Ag
NiCr
9.2
SiO2
161
235



74
76
79
77
72
65
68
67
75
97


Example 8/Ag
NiCr
2.3
SnO2
177
353



51
48
48
49
44
46
47
46
76
97


Example 9/Ag
NiCr
2
SnO2
169
337



59
55
56
57
47
47
49
48
76
85


Example 10/Ag
NiCr
1.9
SnO2
161
321



66
62
63
64
51
48
51
50
76
77


Example 11/Ag
NiCr
3.3
SnO2
140
279



77
72
74
75
57
49
53
52
75
74


Example 12/Ag
NiCr
14
SnO2
119
237



76
74
77
77
60
52
55
54
81
79


Example 13/Ag
NiCr
16
SnO2
114
227



74
73
77
76
64
56
60
58
79
86


Example 14/Ag
NiCr
14.9
SnO2
110
219



72
74
76
74
70
63
65
64
75
97


Example 15/Ag
NiCr
2.4
TiO2
137
340



55
52
52
53
46
50
51
50
75
97


Example 16/Ag
NiCr
2.2
TiO2
131
325



63
59
60
61
49
49
53
50
76
84


Example 17/Ag
NiCr
2.15
TiO2
124
307



71
66
68
69
53
50
55
52
76
76


Example 18/Ag
NiCr
4.3
TiO2
108
268



80
75
77
78
59
50
54
53
75
74


Example 19/Ag
NiCr
14.6
TiO2
92
228



79
76
79
79
63
55
59
57
82
80


Example 20/Ag
NiCr
15.9
TiO2
84
208



75
77
79
77
73
66
68
67
79
97


Example 21/Ag
NiCr
1.2
SnO2
177
353



64
62
62
63
58
59
60
59
86
96


Example 22/Ag
NiCr
1.1
SnO2
170
339



69
66
67
67
59
59
61
60
85
89


Example 23/Ag
NiCr
1
SnO2
165
329



73
70
71
71
62
60
62
61
85
86


Example 24/Ag
NiCr
1.35
SnO2
143
284



82
79
80
81
68
63
65
65
85
84


Example 25/Ag
NiCr
4
SnO2
125
249



84
82
84
84
71
64
66
65
85
85


Example 26/Ag
NiCr
6
SnO2
113
225



80
81
83
82
78
72
74
73
85
97


Ag
NiCr
20.8
SnO2
109
216

0
0
69
70
73
72
66
60
63
62
72
97


Ag
NiCr
20.8
SnO2
117
233

0
0
72
69
72
73
57
51
54
53
85
80


Ag
NiCr
20.9
SnO2
109
216

0
0
68
70
73
72
66
60
63
62
72
97


Ag
NiCr
2.6
SnO2
174
347

0
0
48
44
44
45
39
42
44
42
71
96


Ag
NiCr
19.8
SiO2
161
235

0
0
68
69
72
71
61
55
58
57
70
91


Ag
NiCr
3.3
SiO2
246
359

0
0
38
35
35
36
32
34
35
34
71
96


Ag
NiCr
19.5
SiO2
167
244

0
0
70
68
71
72
56
49
53
52
80
80


Ag
NiCr
2.8
SiO2
230
335

0
0
51
47
48
49
39
38
39
39
70
80


Ag
NiCr
20.5
TiO2
83
205

0
0
73
74
77
76
70
64
67
66
75
97


Ag
NiCr
2.6
TiO2
135
335

0
0
54
50
50
51
44
48
50
48
72
97


Ag
NiCr
20.5
TiO2
91
225

0
0
75
72
75
75
60
54
57
56
85
80


Ag
NiCr
2.7
TiO2
129
319

0
0
61
56
57
58
44
45
49
46
71
80


Cr
NiCr
3.0
SnO2
76
150.91
SiO2
84
123.15
70
69
70
70
65
62
62
62
92
94


Cr
NiCr
4.0
SnO2
87
172.47
SiO2
75
109.47
68
66
67
67
58
54
55
55
87
87


Cr
NiCr
2.0
SnO2
184
366.49
SiO2
159
232.64
50
46
49
49
35
33
39
35
77
71


(SnO2 2. Ord.)


Cr
NiCr
3.0
SnO2
206
409.61
SiO2
131
191.58
55
50
53
54
35
31
38
34
71
65


(SnO2 2. Ord.)


Cr
NiCr
12.0
SnO2
195
388.05
SiO2
141
205.26
50
46
50
50
31
27
32
30
70
62


(SnO2 2. Ord.)


Cr
NiCr
17.0
SnO2
54
107.79
SiO2
112
164.21
65
64
66
66
57
52
54
54
88
88


Cr
NiCr
2.0
SnO2
108
216
SiO2
94
137
49
46
46
47
36
34
36
35
74
75


Cr
NiCr
1.0
SnO2
87
172
SiO2
131
192
50
47
48
49
39
37
39
38
77
79


US4955705








54
54
53
53
56
59
58
58
91
109


FIG. 4


US4955705








46
46
45
46
51
55
53
54
88
119


FIG. 5


US4955705








49
48
46
47
50
54
53
53
77
114


FIG. 6


US4955705








40
40
39
40
45
50
48
48
83
123


FIG. 7


US4955705








38
37
36
37
39
44
42
43
74
119


FIG. 8


WO0241049








50
44
46
48
30
28
31
30
65
64


FIG. 5


WO0241049








33
30
31
32
21
22
23
23
65
73


Fig.


WO0241049








43
40
40
42
36
40
40
39
78
100


Fig.









First of all, the terms used there will be explained. The executions “chromium 2”, “titanium chromium 2” and “TEREF”, belonging to the state of the art, are mirrors having the coating on the side of the substrate facing away from the viewer, “chromium 2” being an ordinary chromium mirror, while “titanium chromium 2” was manufactured according to DE 197 390 46 and “TEREF” (blue), according to EP 0 176 035 B1. “Photopic” and “scotopic” designate integral reflection values corresponding to the respective eye response characteristics according to CIE 1951. The designations A and C symbolize the associated illuminants (according to CIE 1971), HID and LED are weighted reflection values based on spectra of typical discharge lamps and white light-emitting diodes of the company Hella. The designations under the heading “Layer system” will be explained below. Ra is the general color reproduction index according to DIN EN 410 and results from the reflection curve. M* is the larger of the two ratios reflection (illuminant A, scotopic)/reflection (illuminant A, photopic) and reflection (illuminant C, scotopic)/reflection (illuminant C, photopic) and indicates the low glare of the mirror. If the value is smaller than 1, a reduced reflection is perceptible with scotopic vision for the two standardized illuminants A and C. This value should be maximally 97%.


Table 1 shows that the experimental values of LED and HID are very similar to those of C, so that further considerations shall be based on the quantities of C, which are subject to a generally accessible standardization (like A).


As is evident from Table 1, the known systems do not fulfill the required criterion of low glare and, at the same time, sufficient color reproduction. The blue TEREF mirror (reflection spectrum, see FIG. 3), for example, has for illuminant A a daylight reflection of 53%, but at night, of 68%. A possible and understandable explanation lies in the fact that the course of the eye response characteristic has the consequence that spectral reflection values contribute to the perceived integral reflectivity within a narrow range only. The fact that the eye response is shifted in the direction of “blue” at night results in a higher integral reflectivity. The course of the lamp spectrum, which must also be taken into account, leads, e.g. in the case of illuminant A, at shorter wavelengths to a lower illuminance, but obviously, this effect is of secondary importance. It is interesting and surprising in this connection that the low glare of such blue mirrors has been considered as recognized for almost twenty years.


EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

The examples mentioned in Table 1 can be manufactured, for example, as follows, as a rear-side coating of a glass carrier (FIG. 6).

  • 1 glass
  • 2 absorbing thin metallic layer (few nm)
  • 3 dielectric
  • 4 metallic reflector


The layer structure of the above-mentioned examples is listed in Table 1 and the reflection spectra are represented in FIG. 6 to FIG. 9, ds designating the respective layer thickness of the thin metallic layer and of the dielectric layer, do designating the optical-layer thickness of the dielectric layer at a wavelength of 530 nm (approx. in the middle between photopic and scotopic eye response characteristic). The dielectric 3 can for its part have a multilayer structure and comprise in particular an additional layer additionally to the dielectric layer properly speaking, with a lower refractive index than that of the dielectric layer.


All exemplary embodiments show reflection values for illuminants A and C, which decrease by at least 3% (i.e. M* smaller than, or equal to, 97%) upon transition from photopic to scotopic vision and can, therefore, be qualified as low-glare mirrors. At the same time, the mirrors according to the exemplary embodiments have acceptable Ra values (larger than, or equal to, 70), while mirrors according to the state of the art do not reach these values in combination.


The layer system can be applied, for example, using common vacuum coating processes (e.g. vaporization, cathode sputtering, ion plating). Sol-gel processes are also suitable, in particular for the dielectric layer.


Suitable materials for the thin metallic layer 2 are, among others, metals like chromium, nickel, iron, titanium, silver, aluminium, or their alloys. Nickel-chromium alloys are particularly preferred, as they possess an extraordinary chemical stability even in thin layers.


The reflector 4 can consist, e.g., of typical materials like silver, chromium, titanium, aluminium, nickel, rhodium, or their alloys; in the exemplary embodiments, silver or chromium was chosen.


As layer carrier 1 (substrate), in addition to soda-lime glass, other mineral or organic glasses having the necessary optical transparency can be used, too.


The dielectric layer 3 is of particular importance. For this layer, all transparent dielectrics which can be applied in an economic manner, e.g. SiO2, TiO2, ZnS, CeO2, Bi2O3, Ta2O5, can be used. The examples of Table 1 show that in dimensioning the layer system, one must see to it that the optical thickness of the dielectric is within a range leading to the desired properties. The thickness of the optical layer results from the product of thickness and refractive index at a certain wavelength. The materials SiO2, SnO2 and TiO2 have a refractive index of 1.46, 1.99 or 2.48, at 530 nm. For low-refractive materials like SiO2, the optical thickness according to the invention lies, according to Table 1, between 235 nm and 362 nm, towards higher-refractive materials, the range shifts a little (e.g. TiO2: 208 nm to 340 nm). Outside these ranges, no sufficiently low glare is achieved or color reproduction is insufficient. Inside the thickness intervals, variations result in reflection curves of different courses, which to a certain extent allow to influence the color shade of the mirror and are, therefore, accessible to design purposes. With the examples 15 to 20, for example, the colors violet, red, orange, yellow and yellowish green were achieved.

Claims
  • 1-15. (canceled)
  • 16. A low-glare rearview mirror with non-variable optical properties for a vehicle, wherein a ratio between scotopic reflection values for illuminants A and C and photopic reflection values for illuminants A and C is maximally 97% and wherein a color reproduction index Ra according to DIN EN 410 is at least 70.
  • 17. The rearview mirror as recited in claim 16, wherein the ratio between the reflection values is maximally 80%.
  • 18. The rearview mirror as recited in claim 16, wherein the color reproduction index Ra according to DIN EN 410 is at least 75.
  • 19. The rearview mirror as recited in claim 16, wherein the rearview mirror comprises a transparent layer carrier and a multi-layer coating of at least one dielectric and one metallic material.
  • 20. The rearview mirror as recited in claim 19, wherein the transparent layer carrier includes soda-lime glass
  • 21. The rearview mirror as recited in claim 19, wherein the coating is disposed on a side of the layer carrier facing away from a viewer and includes at least the following layers, in the order of their deposition: a) a transparent metallic layer;b) a dielectric layer; andc) a metallic reflecting layer.
  • 22. The rearview mirror as recited in claim 21, wherein the transparent metallic layer includes NiCr and has a thickness of 1 to 21 nm.
  • 23. The rearview mirror as recited in claim 21, wherein the dielectric layer includes TiO2, SiO2 or SnO2.
  • 24. The rearview mirror as recited in claim 21, wherein an optical thickness do of the dielectric layer relates to a function of its refractive index n530 with a wavelength of 530 nm as follows: for a refractive index n530 of maximally 1.99, the optical thickness do is at least the value specified through the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.46, do=235 nm) and (n530=1.99, do=216 nm), and maximally the value specified through the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.46, do=362 nm) and (n530=1.99, do=353 nm), andfor a refractive index n530 of at least 1.99, the optical thickness do is at least the value specified through the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.99, do=216 nm) and (n530=2.48, do=205 nm), and maximally the value specified through the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.99, do=353 nm) and (n530=2.48, do=340 nm).
  • 25. The rearview mirror as recited in claim 24, wherein the optical thickness do of the dielectric layer is: for a refractive index n530 of maximally 1.99, the optical thickness do is at least the value specified through the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.46, do=244 nm) and (n530=1.99, do=233 nm), and maximally the value specified through the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.46, do=335 nm) and (n530=1.99, do=330 nm), and for a refractive index n530 of at least 1.99, the optical thickness do is at least the value specified through the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.99, do=233 nm) and (n530=2.48, do=225 nm), and maximally the value specified through the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.99, do=330 nm) and (n530=2.48, do=319 nm).
  • 26. The rearview mirror as recited in claim 21, further comprising an additional dielectric layer disposed between the reflecting layer and the dielectric layer.
  • 27. The rearview mirror as recited in claim 26, wherein the additional dielectric layer has a lower refractive index than the dielectric layer.
  • 28. The rearview mirror as recited in claim 26, wherein the additional dielectric layer includes at least one of SiO2, MgF2 and SnO2.
  • 29. The rearview mirror as recited in claim 26, wherein a sum of the optical-layer thicknesses of the dielectric layer and the additional layer is at least 250 nm, and maximally 390 nm.
  • 30. The rearview mirror as recited in claim 27, wherein the sum of the optical-layer thicknesses of the dielectric layer and the additional layer is at least 275 nm, and maximally 375 nm.
  • 31. The rearview mirror as recited in claim 26, wherein a sum of the optical-layer thicknesses of the dielectric layer and the additional layer is at least 530 nm, and maximally 670 nm.
  • 32. The rearview mirror as recited in claim 31, wherein the sum of the optical-layer thicknesses of the dielectric layer and the additional layer is at least 560 nm and maximally 635 nm.
  • 33. The rearview mirror as recited in claim 26, wherein the reflecting layer includes at least one of Al, Ni, Ti, Cr and of an alloy of these materials.
  • 34. The rearview mirror as recited in claim 33, wherein the reflecting layer includes Cr.
  • 35. The rearview mirror as recited in claim 26, further comprising at least one of a hydrophilic and/or photocatalytically active coating disposed on a front side of the layer carrier.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
10 2004 023 932.0 May 2004 DE national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/EP2005/005168 5/12/2005 WO 00 2/28/2008