The present invention relates to a rearview mirror for vehicles, in particular for motor vehicles or the like, with a transparent layer carrier, preferably consisting of soda-lime glass, and a coating on the front and/or rear side made from dielectric and metallic materials, the mirror having a low glaring effect due to its reflectance, in particular at night.
Typical known coatings for automobile mirrors consist of the highly reflecting metals silver and aluminium. The reflection values achievable amount to more than 85% in the visible light spectrum. Although, however, high reflection values are desirable in the daylight, they lead at night to a glaring of the driver through the headlights of the following vehicles. Therefore, mirror coatings were developed in the past, which are destined to reduce the glaring effect when driving at night.
One possibility of reducing the glare is the use of alternative reflector materials, such as chromium or titanium chromium (double-layer system of chromium on titanium, see DE 197 390 46). With this, mirrors with a neutral reflection and a reduced reflectance of approx. 45% to 60% can be realized. A further reduction is impossible at present, due to statutory provisions, which prescribe a minimum reflection of 40% in the daylight.
Afterwards, it was tried to improve the behavior of the mirrors through spectrally selective reflection coatings. EP 0 176 935 B1, for examples, describes a blue rearview mirror with reduced reflection in the green to red spectral region. This is based on the assumption that such mirrors have a low glaring effect at night, because the spectral composition of the light of the headlights usual at the moment of application of the patent EP 0 176 935 B1 had a high red contribution and a low blue contribution, so that such blue mirrors additionally diminished the (glaring) light of these headlights.
To evaluate the spectral properties of the mirror coatings, one must in general take into account that the response of the human eye differs greatly within the visible spectral region. This is represented by the so-called response characteristic V(λ), λ designating the wavelength of the light. V(λ) is valid, however, only for the bright adaptation of the eye. With decreasing brightness of the environment, this characteristic shifts towards shorter wavelengths up to the dark-adapted response characteristic V′(λ).
Therefore, another approach for the development of low-glare mirrors were mirrors which, at a relatively high level of spectral reflectance, reduced in particular the region of the highest eye responsiveness at wavelengths of approx. 550 nm (U.S. Pat. No. 4,921,331, U.S. Pat. No. 4,805,989 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,955,705).
With an alternative technology to be mentioned here, one tried to reduce the risk of glaring through the headlights of following vehicles by means of the fact that the mirror structure contains parts of variable transmission, switched, e.g., electrically (e.g. electrochromic mirrors or LCD mirrors). The before-mentioned technologies involve, however, a high expenditure. They require in particular measures of circuit technology to ensure that the low reflection values achievable with them are only effective in concrete cases of acute glare. Accordingly, only vehicles from the top segment are equipped with them at present.
Another important variable for evaluation is the so-called color reproduction index Ra, following the standard DIN EN 410, which is a measure for the manner in which colors can be reproduced or distinguished in the reflected mirror image. The color reproduction index is relevant in particular for visual recognition of the road traffic happenings. Briefly, systems with neutral reflection have a good color reproduction (Ra almost 100), while the color reproduction index of intensely colored mirrors is clearly reduced. This limits in practice the influencing of the glare behavior by means of the mirror spectrum.
The optimum reduction of glare is made even more difficult through the fact that meanwhile other light sources to be used in motor-vehicle headlights were developed, which spectrally differ clearly from the known light sources (halogen headlights) and which complicate the relations.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved rearview mirror with a clear reduction of the glaring through following vehicles (with different headlight structures), in particular in the darkness, and a color reproduction index Ra on at least the order of the known blue-shade mirrors (Ra=74).
that the present invention provides a rearview mirror wherein the reflection layer has a spectral reflection behavior showing at night a relative reduction of the reflection values of illuminants A and C by at least 3%, preferably by at least 5%, particularly preferably by at least 10%, as compared with the bright-adapted. The color reproduction index is in this case at least 70.
Advantageous embodiments of the invention are the subject matter of the claims.
In particular, the coating is located advantageously on the side of the layer carrier which is facing away from the viewer. In an alternative or additional advantageous development, the coating comprises, in the order of their deposition, a transparent metallic layer, a dielectric layer and a metallic reflecting layer, the transparent metallic layer preferably consisting of NiCr and having a thickness of 1 to 21 nm. The dielectric layer preferably consists of TiO2, SiO2 or SnO2.
Particularly good results can be achieved by designing the optical properties of the rearview mirror according to a so-called design wavelength, which is particularly well adapted to the response characteristic of the eye, both for photopic and for scotopic vision. A wavelength of approx. 530 nm was chosen as a particularly well suited design wavelength, corresponding to an intermediate value between the maxima of the response characteristic for photopic vision, on the one hand, and for scotopic vision, on the other hand. To guarantee a particularly well suited adaptation of the layer system to this design wavelength, the layer thicknesses, in particular the so-called optical-layer thickness, i.e. the product of actual layer thickness and refractive index, of the dielectric layer are preferably chosen in a suitable manner. Preferably, the optical thickness do of the dielectric layer is chosen as a function of its refractive index n530, with the design wavelength being 530 nm, in such a way that it lies within a range which is considered as particularly well suited. This range is limited for a refractive index n530 of maximally 1.99, as the lower limit, by the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.46, do=235 nm) and (n530=1.99, do=216 nm), preferably by the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.46, do=244 nm) and (n530=1.99, do=233 nm), and as the upper limit, by the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.46, do=362 nm) and (n530=1.99, do=353 nm), preferably by the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.46, do=335 nm) and (n530=1.99, do=330 nm). For a refractive index n530 of at least 1.99, however, the range considered as preferable is limited, as the lower limit, by the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.99, do=216 nm) and (n530=2.48, do=205 nm), preferably by the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.99, do=233 nm) and (n530=2.48, do=225 nm), and as the upper limit by the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.99, do=353 nm) and (n530=2.48, do=340 nm), preferably by the straight line given in the (n530, do) space and running through the points (n530=1.99, do=330 nm) and (n530=2.48, do=319 nm).
By choosing these parameters, it is guaranteed that the dielectric layer has an optical thickness of 235 nm to 362 nm, preferably of 244 to 335 nm, if its refractive index amounts to 1.45 at 530 nm, whereas the dielectric layer has an optical thickness of 216 nm to 353 nm, preferably of 233 to 330 nm, if its refractive index amounts to 1.99 at 530 nm, and an optical thickness of 205 nm to 340 nm, preferably of 225 to 319 nm, if its refractive index amounts to 2.45 at 530 nm. In the intermediate range between these refractive indices, the dielectric layer has an optical thickness in a range which results from linear interpolation due to its refractive index at 530 nm, lying in the interval of 1.46 to 1.99 or in the interval of 1.99 to 2.48.
In conventional rearview mirrors, usually silver (Ag) is used as reflector material. This usually requires, however, expensive anticorrosive measures, for example the application of protective varnish or the like, in order to guarantee a reliable reflection effect under all conditions of application. On the one hand, for reasons of cost and, on the other hand, for reasons of environmental protection, in particular in view of the materials used in such protective varnishes, it is, therefore, desirable to provide alternative materials for the reflecting layer. This is, however, not easily possible, in view of the optical properties provided by the design, in particular for safeguarding the required reflection values. Surprisingly, it turned out, however, that these design targets, i.e. observation of particularly advantageous optical properties when using alternative reflector materials, can be achieved by arranging, in a particularly advantageous embodiment, a further dielectric layer in the manner of an additional layer between the dielectric layer provided anyhow and the reflecting layer. This additional layer has in a further advantageous embodiment a reduced refractive index as compared with the dielectric layer.
Advantageously, the additional dielectric layer consists of SiO2 or MgF2, or, if the refraction of the dielectric layer is high enough, of SnO2.
In this multilayer system, too, the set of characteristic parameters, i.e. the combination of layer thicknesses, is preferably chosen in such a suitable way that an adaptation to a design wavelength, preferably of approx. 530 nm, is effected. This is achieved by the fact that the sum of the optical-layer thicknesses of the dielectric layer and the additional layer is at least 250 nm, preferably at least 275 nm, and maximally 390 nm, preferably maximally 375 nm. With that, the total optical-layer thickness given through the dielectric double layer lies within a band of a certain bandwidth above and around half the design wavelength. In an alternative advantageous embodiment, the sum of the optical-layer thicknesses of the dielectric layer and the additional layer is at least 530 nm, preferably at least 560 nm, and maximally 670 nm, preferably maximally 635 nm.
The multilayer structure of the dielectric enables the use of alternative reflector materials. Advantageously, the reflecting layer consists of aluminium (Al), nickel (Ni), titanium (Ti), chromium (Cr) or of an alloy of these materials, but preferably of Cr.
The coating is advantageously applied on the rear side of the layer carrier, so that it is protected by the layer carrier against damage or other detrimental effects from the exterior. In another advantageous embodiment, the front of the layer carrier is provided with a hydrophilic and/or a photocatalytically active coating, which prevents an undesired fogging-up in a manner known in itself.
The invention is illustrated by the following drawings, in which:
Table 1 represents the characteristic optical data of known mirror systems and systems according to the present invention.
First of all, the terms used there will be explained. The executions “chromium 2”, “titanium chromium 2” and “TEREF”, belonging to the state of the art, are mirrors having the coating on the side of the substrate facing away from the viewer, “chromium 2” being an ordinary chromium mirror, while “titanium chromium 2” was manufactured according to DE 197 390 46 and “TEREF” (blue), according to EP 0 176 035 B1. “Photopic” and “scotopic” designate integral reflection values corresponding to the respective eye response characteristics according to CIE 1951. The designations A and C symbolize the associated illuminants (according to CIE 1971), HID and LED are weighted reflection values based on spectra of typical discharge lamps and white light-emitting diodes of the company Hella. The designations under the heading “Layer system” will be explained below. Ra is the general color reproduction index according to DIN EN 410 and results from the reflection curve. M* is the larger of the two ratios reflection (illuminant A, scotopic)/reflection (illuminant A, photopic) and reflection (illuminant C, scotopic)/reflection (illuminant C, photopic) and indicates the low glare of the mirror. If the value is smaller than 1, a reduced reflection is perceptible with scotopic vision for the two standardized illuminants A and C. This value should be maximally 97%.
Table 1 shows that the experimental values of LED and HID are very similar to those of C, so that further considerations shall be based on the quantities of C, which are subject to a generally accessible standardization (like A).
As is evident from Table 1, the known systems do not fulfill the required criterion of low glare and, at the same time, sufficient color reproduction. The blue TEREF mirror (reflection spectrum, see
The examples mentioned in Table 1 can be manufactured, for example, as follows, as a rear-side coating of a glass carrier (
The layer structure of the above-mentioned examples is listed in Table 1 and the reflection spectra are represented in
All exemplary embodiments show reflection values for illuminants A and C, which decrease by at least 3% (i.e. M* smaller than, or equal to, 97%) upon transition from photopic to scotopic vision and can, therefore, be qualified as low-glare mirrors. At the same time, the mirrors according to the exemplary embodiments have acceptable Ra values (larger than, or equal to, 70), while mirrors according to the state of the art do not reach these values in combination.
The layer system can be applied, for example, using common vacuum coating processes (e.g. vaporization, cathode sputtering, ion plating). Sol-gel processes are also suitable, in particular for the dielectric layer.
Suitable materials for the thin metallic layer 2 are, among others, metals like chromium, nickel, iron, titanium, silver, aluminium, or their alloys. Nickel-chromium alloys are particularly preferred, as they possess an extraordinary chemical stability even in thin layers.
The reflector 4 can consist, e.g., of typical materials like silver, chromium, titanium, aluminium, nickel, rhodium, or their alloys; in the exemplary embodiments, silver or chromium was chosen.
As layer carrier 1 (substrate), in addition to soda-lime glass, other mineral or organic glasses having the necessary optical transparency can be used, too.
The dielectric layer 3 is of particular importance. For this layer, all transparent dielectrics which can be applied in an economic manner, e.g. SiO2, TiO2, ZnS, CeO2, Bi2O3, Ta2O5, can be used. The examples of Table 1 show that in dimensioning the layer system, one must see to it that the optical thickness of the dielectric is within a range leading to the desired properties. The thickness of the optical layer results from the product of thickness and refractive index at a certain wavelength. The materials SiO2, SnO2 and TiO2 have a refractive index of 1.46, 1.99 or 2.48, at 530 nm. For low-refractive materials like SiO2, the optical thickness according to the invention lies, according to Table 1, between 235 nm and 362 nm, towards higher-refractive materials, the range shifts a little (e.g. TiO2: 208 nm to 340 nm). Outside these ranges, no sufficiently low glare is achieved or color reproduction is insufficient. Inside the thickness intervals, variations result in reflection curves of different courses, which to a certain extent allow to influence the color shade of the mirror and are, therefore, accessible to design purposes. With the examples 15 to 20, for example, the colors violet, red, orange, yellow and yellowish green were achieved.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 023 932.0 | May 2004 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2005/005168 | 5/12/2005 | WO | 00 | 2/28/2008 |