Patent Application
20180017292
The present invention relates to high efficiency, low-global warming potential (“low GWP”) air conditioning and/or refrigeration systems and methods for providing cooling that are safe and effective.
In typical air conditioning and refrigerant systems, a compressor is used to compress a heat transfer vapor from a lower to a higher pressure, which in turn adds heat to the vapor. This added heat is typically rejected in a heat exchanger, commonly referred to as a condenser. The heat transfer vapor that enters the condenser is condensed to produce a liquid heat transfer fluid at a relatively high pressure. Typically the condenser uses a fluid available in large quantities in the ambient environment, such as ambient outside air, as the heat sink. Once it has been condensed, the high-pressure heat transfer fluid undergoes a substantially isoenthalpic expansion, such would occur by passing the fluid through an expansion device or valve, where it is expanded to a lower pressure, which in turn results in the fluid undergoing a decrease in temperature. The lower pressure, lower temperature heat transfer fluid from the expansion operation then is typically routed to an evaporator, where it absorbs heat and in so doing evaporates. This evaporation process in turn results in cooling of the fluid or body to that it is intended to cool. In many typical air conditioning and refrigeration applications, the cooled fluid is the air which is contained in the region to be cooled, such as the air in the dwelling being air conditioned or the air inside a walk-in cooler or a supermarket cooler or freezer. After the heat transfer fluid is evaporated at low pressure in the evaporator, it is returned to the compressor where the cycle begins once again.
A complex and interrelated combination of factors and requirements is associated with forming efficient, effective and safe air conditioning systems that are at the same time environmentally friendly, that is, have both low GWP impact and low ozone depletion (“ODP” impact. With respect to efficiency and effectiveness, it is important for the heat transfer fluid to operate in air conditioning and refrigeration systems with high levels of efficiency and high relative capacity. At the same time, since it is possible that the heat transfer fluid may escape over time into the atmosphere, it is important for the fluid to have low values for both GWP and ODP.
Applicants have come to appreciate that while certain fluids are able to achieve high levels of both efficiency and effectiveness, and at the same time low levels of both GWP and ODP, many fluids which satisfy this combination of requirements nevertheless suffer from the disadvantage of having deficiencies in connection with safety. For example, fluids which might otherwise be acceptable may be disfavored because of flammability properties and/or toxicity concerns. Applicants have come to appreciate that the use of fluids having such properties is especially undesirable in typical air conditioning and in many refrigeration systems since such flammable and/or toxic fluids may inadvertently be released into the dwelling, walk-in, cold-box, chiller, freezer or transport refrigeration box which is being cooled, thus exposing or potentially exposing the occupants thereof to dangerous conditions. Applicants have also come to appreciate that this problem is even of a more intense concern for relatively small systems, e.g., systems with a capacity of less than 30 kw since for such systems the cost of effective safety protection systems, such as fire protections systems, are frequently not economically viable.
According to one aspect of the invention, a cascade refrigerant system is provided for providing cooling of air, directly or indirectly but preferably directly, located in an enclosure that is occupied by or which will be exposed to humans or other animals during normal use. As used herein, the term “enclosure” means a space that is at least partially confined (e.g., the enclosure can be opened on one or more sides, or closed) and includes air that has been cooled.
Preferred embodiments of the present systems include at least a first evaporator which is located within the enclosure and is part of a first, relatively low temperature heat transfer circuit. The low temperature heat transfer circuit preferably comprises a first heat transfer fluid in a vapor compression circulation loop comprising at least: a compressor for raising the pressure of the first heat transfer composition; a heat exchanger for condensing at least a portion of the first heat transfer composition from the compressor at a relatively high pressure; an expansion device for lowering the pressure of the heat transfer composition from the condenser; and an evaporator for absorbing heat from the enclosure to be cooled into the heat transfer composition. Preferably one or more of said compressor, condenser and said expansion valve, and most preferably all of these, are located outside the enclosure and the evaporator is located within the enclosure.
The systems of the present invention also preferably include a second heat transfer circuit located substantially outside the enclosure, which is sometimes referred to herein by way of convenience as the “high temperature” loop. The high temperature loop preferably comprises a second heat transfer fluid in a vapor compression circulation loop comprising at least a compressor, a heat exchanger which serves to condense the heat transfer fluid in the high temperature loop, preferably by heat exchange with ambient air outside of the enclosure, and an expansion device for reducing the pressure of the second heat transfer fluid from the compressor.
An important aspect of preferred embodiments of the present invention is that the heat exchanger which serves as the condenser in the low temperature circuit is thermally coupled with the high temperature circuit by virtue of rejecting heat into the second heat transfer fluid, preferably by causing at least a substantial portion of said second heat transfer fluid to evaporate. In this way, the condenser of the low temperature circuit and the evaporator of the high temperature circuit are thermally coupled in this heat exchanger, which is sometimes referred to for convenience as “a cascade heat exchanger” in the systems and methods of the present invention.
Another important aspect of the present invention in preferred embodiments comprises the presence in the high temperature loop of a heat exchanger which has been found to advantageously and unexpectedly improve system performance by transferring heat from the second heat transfer fluid exiting from the high temperature condenser to the portion of the second heat transfer fluid which is traveling to the suction side of the compressor. This heat exchanger is sometimes referred to herein for convenience as a “suction line heat exchanger.”
Another important aspect of the preferred systems is that the first heat transfer fluid which is circulating in the low temperature loop comprises a refrigerant which has a GWP of not greater than about 500, more preferably not greater than about 400, and even more preferably not greater than about 150 and furthermore that the first heat transfer fluid has a flammability that is substantially less than the flammability of the second heat transfer fluid. Preferably, the second heat transfer fluid which is circulating in the high temperature loop also comprises a refrigerant which has a GWP of not greater than about 500, more preferably not greater than about 400, and even more preferably not greater than about 150, but since in normal operation this heat transfer fluid will never enter the enclosure, applicants have found that is advantageous to use a fluid in this high temperature loop that has one or properties that would be considered disadvantageous if it circulated within the enclosure, for example, flammability, toxicity and the like. In this way, the present systems allow additional possible unexpected advantages over systems that would rely only of the first heat transfer composition or only the second heat transfer composition, as explained in detail below.
In certain preferred embodiments the second refrigerant comprises, more preferably comprises at least about 50% by weight and even more preferably at least about 75% by weight, of trans-1,3,3,3-trifluoropropene (HFO-1234ze(E) and/or HFO-1234yf, and the second refrigerant has a flammability greater than , and preferably substantially greater than about, the flammability of CO2. In another embodiment the second refrigerant comprises, more preferably comprises at least about 75% by weight and even more preferably at least about 80% by weight, of trans-1,3,3,3-trifluoropropene (HFO-1234ze(E) and/or HFO-1234yf.
In each of the preferred embodiments described herein the system includes:
(a) a relatively low temperature vapor compression loop comprising a compressor, an expander and an evaporator in fluid communication in said loop, and a first heat transfer composition in said loop comprising a first refrigerant and preferably lubricant for the compressor, said evaporator being located in an enclosure containing air to be cooled and being capable of absorbing heat from said air at about said relatively low temperature;
(b) a relatively high temperature vapor compression loop comprising a compressor, a condenser, an expander, and a suction line heat exchanger in fluid communication in said loop, and a second heat transfer composition in said loop comprising a second refrigerant and preferably lubricant for the compressor, said condenser being capable of transferring heat to a heat sink located outside said enclosure; and
(c) a cascade heat exchanger for condensing said first refrigerant and evaporating said second refrigerant by heat exchange between said first and second refrigerant,
wherein said suction line heat exchanger is in fluid communication with said cascade heat exchanger for receiving at least a portion of said second heat transfer composition exiting said cascade heat exchanger and increases the temperature thereof by absorbing heat from said first heat transfer composition exiting said condenser and thereby reducing the temperature of said first heat transfer composition prior to said first heat transfer composition entering said first loop expander.
As used herein, the terms “relatively low temperature” and “relatively high temperature,” when used together with respect to the first and second heat transfer loops, and unless otherwise indicated, are used in a relative sense to designate the relative temperature of the indicated heat transfer compositions, where those differences are least about 5° C.
Preferably the first refrigerant has a flammability that is substantially less than the flammability of the second refrigerant. In preferred embodiments, the first refrigerant has a flammability according to ASHRAE Standard 34 (which specifies measurement according to ASTM E681) that is classified as Al and the second refrigerant has a flammability according to ASHRAE Standard 34 that is classified as A2L or a higher flammability than A2L, although A2L classification for the second refrigerant is preferred. It is also preferred that the first and the second refrigerant each have a Global Warming Potential (GWP) that is less than about 150.
In preferred embodiments the first refrigerant circulating in the low temperature loop comprises carbon dioxide, preferably consists essentially of carbon dioxide and more preferably in some embodiments consists of carbon dioxide.
It is preferred that the second refrigerant comprises one or more of trans1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234ze(E)), 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf), R-227ea, and R-32 and combinations of two or more of these. In preferred embodiments, the second refrigerant comprises at least about 50%, more preferably at least about 80% by weight of 2, 3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf). In other preferred embodiments, the second refrigerant comprises at least about 50%, more preferably at least about 80% by weight of or at least about 75% by weight, more preferably at least about 80% by weight of trans1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234ze(E)). In highly preferred embodiments, the second refrigerant comprises at least about 95% by weight, and in some embodiments consists essentially of or consists of HFO-1234ze(E), HFO-1234yf or combinations of two or more of these.
In other highly preferred embodiments, the second refrigerant comprises from about 70% by weight to about 90% of HFO-1234yf, preferably about 80% by weight of HFO-1234yf and from about 10% by weight to about 30% by weight of R32, preferably about 20% by weight of R-32.
In other highly preferred embodiments, the second refrigerant comprises from about 70% by weight to about 90% of HFO-1234ze(E), preferably about 80% by weight of HFO-1234ze(E) and from about 10% by weight to about 30% by weight of R32, preferably about 20% by weight of R-32.
In other highly preferred embodiments, the second refrigerant comprises from about 85% to about 90% by weight of by weight of trans1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234ze(E)) and from about 10% by weight to about 15% by weight of 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (HFC-227ea), and even more preferably in some embodiments about 88% of trans1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234ze(E)) and about 12% by weight of 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (HFC-227ea).
Those skilled in the art will appreciate in view of the disclosures contained herein that the preferred embodiments of the present invention provide the advantage of utilizing only the safe (relatively low toxicity and low flammability) low GWP refrigerants within the enclosure to be cooled and a relatively less safe, but preferably low GWP refrigerant in the high temperature loop which is located entirely outside of the enclosure.
As used herein, the terms “safe” and “relatively less safe,” when used together with respect to the first and second heat transfer loops, and unless otherwise indicated, are used in a relative sense to designate the relative safety of the indicated heat transfer compositions. Such configuration, especially when the high temperature system includes the preferred suction line heat exchanger, makes the systems and methods of the invention highly preferred for use in a location proximate to the humans or other animals occupying or using the enclosure, as is commonly encountered in walk-in freezers, supermarket coolers and the like.
Preferred embodiments of the second refrigerant are disclosed in the following table:
The first heat transfer composition and the second heat transfer compositions also each generally include a lubricant, generally in amounts of from about 30 to about 50 percent by weight of the heat transfer composition, with the balance comprising refrigerant and other optional components that may be present. Combinations of surfactants and solubilizing agents may also be added to the present compositions to aid oil solubility, as disclosed by U.S. Pat. No. 6,516,837, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. Commonly used refrigeration lubricants such as Polyol Esters (POEs) and Poly Alkylene Glycols (PAGs), silicone oil, mineral oil, alkyl benzenes (ABs) and poly(alpha-olefin) (PAO) that are used in refrigeration machinery with hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) refrigerants may be used with the refrigerant compositions of the present invention. The preferred lubricants are POEs.
Preferred combinations of first refrigerant, second refrigerant and lubricant according to one aspect of the invention are provided below.
It is generally contemplated that operating conditions used in the present systems and methods can be varied widely in view of the disclosure contained herein depending upon the specific applications. However, many preferred applications will advantageously use operating parameters within the ranges indicated in the table below, with all amounts understood to be modified by “about”:
When operating within the process conditions according to the present invention, the use of the suction line heat exchanger as described herein preferably produces at least a 2% COP improvement, more preferably at least about 3% COP improvement, and even more preferably a 4% COP improvement compared to the same system but without a suction-line heat exchanger according to the present invention.
In the following descriptions, components or elements of the system which are or can be generally the same or similar in different embodiments are designated with the same number or symbol.
One preferred refrigeration system is illustrated in
Although it is contemplated that the relative size of the first and second refrigeration loops according to the present invention maybe vary widely within the scope hereof, applicants have found that highly advantageous results can be achieved in certain embodiments by judicious selection of the relative sizes of the refrigeration loops. More specifically, it is contemplated and understood that under normal operating conditions the heat transfer composition contained in the first refrigeration loop and in the second refrigeration loop will never mix or intermingle. However, applicants have come to appreciate that the possibility of such intermixing of first and second refrigerants might occur for example, in the case of leakage in the cascade heat exchanger. This mixed refrigerant stream may then, in the event of a leak within the enclosure being cold, become exposed to humans or other animals located in or near the enclosure. Accordingly, in order to ensure continued safe operation even in the case of such leakage, applicants have come to appreciate that careful and judicious selection of the relative refrigeration loop sizes can result in a safe system even in the event of such a leakage.
While applicants contemplate that the systems and compositions of the present invention will be useful in many refrigeration applications, preferred applications include refrigeration systems and methods used in applications such as treating the air, including cooling and/or heating, in enclosures such as residential dwellings, office space, warehouses and the like, and in connection with enclosures used to keep items cool by cooling the air in the enclosure, such as walk-in boxes, cold-boxes, transport refrigeration boxes and the like. As used herein, the term “transport refrigeration box” is used to designate cold/insulated boxes which are located on or comprise a portion or substantially all of a truck trailer. Furthermore, in preferred applications the capacity of the system according to the present invention is less than about 30 kW. In preferred applications the capacity of the system according to the present invention is less than about 15 kW, and in yet further applications the capacity of the system according to the present invention is less than about 10 kW.
Examples of several preferred systems, methods and compositions are described below:
A. First Refrigerant is CO2 and Second Refrigerant is R-1234ze(E)
By way of example, applicants have considered a cascade refrigeration system according to the present invention in which the first refrigerant consists of CO2 in the second refrigerant consists of R01234ze(E). In order to arrive at a refrigeration system according to the present invention which is safe, even in the event of intermixing between the first and second refrigerants, applicants have determined the flammability of various mixtures (including vapor and liquid) of these components as follows:
Based upon the above considerations and analysis, and preferred aspects of the present invention in which the first refrigerant consists essentially of CO2 and a second refrigerant consists essentially of R-1234ze(E), it is preferred that the weight ratio of the loading of the first refrigerant (e.g. CO2) in the low temperature loop to the second refrigerant (e.g. R-1234ze(E)) is not less than about 1.2. In such embodiments, the system of the present invention will remain safe, i.e., contain only nonflammable refrigerant, even in the event of complete intermixing between the first and the second refrigerant compositions.
B. First Refrigerant is CO2 and Second Refrigerant is SR26
By way of further example, applicants have considered a cascade refrigeration system according to the present invention in which the first refrigerant consists of CO2 and the second refrigerant consists of a SR26 (80:20 weight ratio combination of R-1234ze(E);R-32). In order to arrive at a refrigeration system according to the present invention which is safe, even in the event of intermixing between the first and second refrigerants, applicants have determined the flammability of various mixtures (including vapor and liquid) of these components as follows:
Based upon the above considerations and analysis, and preferred aspects of the present invention in which the first refrigerant consists essentially of CO2 and a second refrigerant consists essentially of SR26, it is preferred that the weight ratio of the loading of the first refrigerant (e.g. CO2) in the low temperature loop to the second refrigerant (e.g. SR26) is not less than about 1.0. In such embodiments, the system of the present invention will remain safe, i.e., contain only nonflammable refrigerant, even in the event of complete intermixing between the first and the second refrigerant compositions.
C. First Refrigerant is CO2 and Second Refrigerant is R-32
By way of additional example, applicants have considered a cascade refrigeration system according to the present invention in which the first refrigerant consists of CO2 and the second refrigerant consists of a R-32. In order to arrive at a refrigeration system according to the present invention which is safe, even in the event of intermixing between the first and second refrigerants, applicants have determined the flammability of various mixtures (including vapor and liquid) of these components as follows:
Based upon the above considerations and analysis, and preferred aspects of the present invention in which the first refrigerant consists essentially of CO2 and a second refrigerant consists essentially of SR26, it is preferred that the weight ratio of the loading of the first refrigerant (e.g. CO2) in the low temperature loop to the second refrigerant (e.g. SR26) is not less than about 0.9. In such embodiments, the system of the present invention will remain safe, i.e., contain only nonflammable refrigerant, even in the event of complete intermixing between the first and the second refrigerant compositions.
D. First Refrigerant is CO2 and Second Refrigerant is Ethane
By way of additional example, applicants have considered a cascade refrigeration system according to the present invention in which the first refrigerant consists of CO2 and the second refrigerant consists of ethane. In order to arrive at a refrigeration system according to the present invention which is safe, even in the event of intermixing between the first and second refrigerants, applicants have determined the flammability of various mixtures (including vapor and liquid) of these components as follows:
Based upon the above considerations and analysis, and preferred aspects of the present invention in which the first refrigerant consists essentially of CO2 and a second refrigerant consists essentially of ethane, it is preferred that the weight ratio of the loading of the first refrigerant (e.g. CO2) in the low temperature loop to the second refrigerant (e.g. SR26) is not less than about 1.7. In such embodiments, the system of the present invention will remain safe, i.e., contain only nonflammable refrigerant, even in the event of complete intermixing between the first and the second refrigerant compositions.
E. First Refrigerant is CO2 and Second Refrigerant is Propane
By way of additional example, applicants have considered a cascade refrigeration system according to the present invention in which the first refrigerant consists of CO2 and the second refrigerant consists of propone. In order to arrive at a refrigeration system according to the present invention which is safe, even in the event of intermixing between the first and second refrigerants, applicants have determined the flammability of various mixtures (including vapor and liquid) of these components as follows:
Based upon the above considerations and analysis, and preferred aspects of the present invention in which the first refrigerant consists essentially of CO2 and a second refrigerant consists essentially of propane, it is preferred that the weight ratio of the loading of the first refrigerant (e.g. CO2) in the low temperature loop to the second refrigerant (e.g. propane) is greater than 4. In such embodiments, the system of the present invention will remain safe, i.e., contain only nonflammable refrigerant, even in the event of complete intermixing between the first and the second refrigerant compositions.
Comparative Example Cl as described below is based on a typical walk-in cooler refrigeration system as illustrated in
In
The following operating parameters are used:
A hybrid system based on the typical refrigeration system as illustrated in Example 1 is formed but a suction line heat exchanger is inserted so as to absorb heat into the R-404A exiting the evaporator and thereby increasing the temperature of R-404A entering the compressor by absorbing heat from R-404A exiting the condenser prior to that stream entering expander. Operation using a suction line heat exchanger with Effectiveness values varying from 35% to 85% are evaluated. The results are reported in the following Table H1, together with the result of comparative Example C1 for comparison:
As can be seen from the results reported above, modifying a typical system to include a suction line heat exchanger is not viable since in every case there is a substantial, and unwanted and undesirable, increase in the compressor discharge temperature as a result of operating such a hybrid system.
A cascade refrigeration system having a suction line heat exchanger as illustrated in
As revealed by the table above, all Examples of the present invention satisfy the preferred compressor discharge temperatures of the present invention, and in all cases the discharge temperature is substantially superior to the performance of the typical system and even the hybrid system.
Table 1/5-COP below shows the results in terms of COP for each example, with result from Comparative Example 1 being shown for comparison:
As revealed by the table above, all Examples of the present invention result in improved COP of at least 121% compared to the system of Comparative Example 1. In addition all systems of the present invention which include a suction-line heat exchanger show at least an additional 2% improvement versus the system of the present invention without heat exchanger, and a systems with 55% or higher heat exchanger effectiveness for the suction line heat exchanger show at least an additional 3% improvement versus the system without heat exchanger.
A cascade refrigeration system having no suction line heat exchanger and a suction line heat exchanger as illustrated in
Using the same operating conditions identified in Examples 1-5, the system of
As revealed by the table above, using the refrigerants EX6-EX9 produce acceptable discharge temperatures (within the scope of preferred discharge temperature range) for cascade systems without a suction line heat exchanger (effectiveness=0). However, none of the refrigerants produce acceptable discharge temperatures (within the scope of preferred discharge temperature range) for cascade systems for any of the values of effectiveness from 35% to 85%.
A cascade refrigeration system having no suction line heat exchanger and a suction line heat exchanger as illustrated in
Using the same operating conditions identified in Examples 1-5, the system of
As revealed by the table above, using the refrigerants EX10-EX15 results in a second refrigerant with a GWP value below 500, but not each refrigerant produces an acceptable discharge temperature (i.e., within the scope of preferred discharge temperature range). For cascade systems without a suction line heat exchanger (effectiveness=0), the discharge temperature is acceptable. However, for systems with a suction line heat exchanger, each of EX10 -EX13 refrigerants produce unacceptable discharge temperatures for the desired effectiveness values of 85% or above. Only EX 14 and EX 15 provide acceptable discharge temperatures for suction line heat exchangers having any of the tested effectiveness values. These finding are summarized below:
Table 11/15-COP below shows the results in terms of COP for each example, with result from Comparative Example 1 being shown for comparison:
As revealed by the table above, all Examples of the present invention result a COP of at least 121% compared to the system of Comparative Example 1. In addition the use of the refrigerant of Example 15 in all tested systems of the present invention which include a suction-line heat exchanger show at least an additional 2% improvement versus the system of the present invention without the suction-line heat exchanger, The use of the refrigerant of Example 14 in tested systems of the present invention which include a suction-line heat exchanger with and effectiveness of at least 55% show at least an additional 2% improvement versus the system of the present invention without the suction-line heat exchanger and (as shown in Table 11/15-DT) have an acceptable discharge temperature. The use of the refrigerant of Example 13 in tested systems of the present invention which include a suction-line heat exchanger with and effectiveness of at least 55% but less than about 85% show at least an additional 2% improvement versus the system of the present invention without the suction-line heat exchanger and (as shown in Table 11/15-DT) have an acceptable discharge temperature.
In contrast, while the use of the refrigerant of Example 12 in tested systems of the present invention which include a suction-line heat exchanger with an effectiveness of at least 75% show at least an additional 2% improvement versus the system of the present invention without the suction-line heat exchanger, as shown in Table 11/15-DT, this refrigerant does not provide an acceptable discharge temperature for this conditions.
A cascade refrigeration system having no suction line heat exchanger and a suction line heat exchanger as illustrated in
Using the same operating conditions identified in Examples 1-5, the system of
As revealed by the table above, using the refrigerants EX16-EX19 produce acceptable discharge temperatures (within the scope of preferred discharge temperature range) for cascade systems without a suction line heat exchanger (effectiveness=0). However, none of the refrigerants produce acceptable discharge temperatures (within the scope of preferred discharge temperature range) for cascade systems for any of the values of effectiveness from 35% to 85%.
A cascade refrigeration system having no suction line heat exchanger and a suction line heat exchanger as illustrated in
Using the same operating conditions identified in Examples 1-5, the system of
Example 1 being shown for comparison:
As revealed by the table above, using the refrigerants EX21-EX25 results in a second refrigerant with a GWP value below 500, but not each refrigerant produces an acceptable discharge temperature (i.e., within the scope of preferred discharge temperature range). For cascade systems without a suction line heat exchanger (effectiveness=0), the discharge temperature is acceptable. However, for systems with a suction line heat exchanger, each of refrigerants EX20-EX22 produces unacceptable discharge temperatures for the desired effectiveness values of 85% or above. Only EX 23, EX24 and EX 25 provide acceptable discharge temperatures for suction line heat exchangers for all tested effectiveness values. These findings are summarized below:
Table 20/25-COP below shows the results in terms of COP for each example, with result from Comparative Example 1 being shown for comparison:
As revealed by the table above, all Examples of the present invention result a COP of at least 121% compared to the system of Comparative Example 1. In addition the use of the refrigerant of Examples 24 and 25 in all tested systems of the present invention which include a suction-line heat exchanger show at least an additional 2% improvement versus the system of the present invention without the suction-line heat exchanger, and the refrigerant of Examples 22 and 23 shows at least an additional 2% improvement versus the system of the present invention without the suction-line heat exchanger for heat exchangers with effectiveness of 55% or greater. The use of the refrigerant of Examples 22 in tested systems of the present invention which include a suction-line heat exchanger with an effectiveness of at least 75% show at least an additional 2% improvement versus the system of the present invention without the suction-line heat exchanger.
Importantly, the use of the refrigerant of Examples 24 and 25 in all tested systems of the present invention which include a suction-line heat exchanger not only show at least an additional 2% improvement versus the system of the present invention without the suction-line heat exchanger, such refrigerants (as shown in Table 21/25-DT) have an acceptable discharge temperature for all levels of suction line heat exchanger effectiveness tested. The use of the refrigerant of Examples 22 and 23 in tested systems of the present invention which include a suction-line heat exchanger with an effectiveness of 55% show not only at least an additional 2% improvement versus the system of the present invention without the suction-line heat exchanger but (as shown in Table 21/25-DT) also have an acceptable discharge temperature.
In contrast, while the use of the refrigerant of Example 20 does not demonstrate at least a 2% improvement for any values of heat exchanger effectiveness, and while Examples 21 and 22 show at least a 2% improvement for heat exchanger effectiveness values of 75% and 85%, these values of heat exchanger effectively do not does not provide an acceptable discharge, as shown in Table 20/25-DT, this refrigerant does not for this conditions.
The present application claims priority to Provisional Application 62/313,177, filed Mar. 25, 2016, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The present application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/400,891, filed Jan. 6, 2017, now pending, which in turn claims the priority benefit of Provisional application 62/275,382, filed Jan. 6, 2016, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The present application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/434,400, filed Feb. 16, 2017, now pending, which in turn claims the priority benefit of 62/295,731, filed Feb. 16, 2016, the entire contents of each of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62313177 | Mar 2016 | US | |
| 62275382 | Jan 2016 | US | |
| 62295731 | Feb 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15400891 | Jan 2017 | US |
| Child | 15468292 | US | |
| Parent | 15434400 | Feb 2017 | US |
| Child | 15400891 | US |
