An embodiment of this invention includes a repetition base 40 with repetition main beam 180 that is not straight, as with prior art repetition bases, but rather is angled, in one section 260, toward the heel 140 of the action 10 and the capstan of the piano. A repetition base 40 with angled repetition main beam 180 results in a lower inertia piano action primarily because of two reasons.
First, an angled repetition main beam 180 that extends downward toward the heel 140 of the action allows for a much shorter heel 140. A shorter heel 140 is desirable because shorter heels weigh less than taller heels. The weights of heels 140 are very important to the moment of inertia of the piano action 10 because heels 140 are relatively heavy components of the action 10 that are located relatively far from the repetition center of rotation 30. An angled repetition main beam 180 allows for a substantial weight savings in the heel 140. For instance, a mode of heel 140, as depicted in the drawings in this application, weighs 61% less than most heels in the public domain. The main beam angled section 260 is a component of the repetition main beam 180.
Second, the “V” connection with web support 210 between the repetition main beam 180 and the balancier support beam 190 delivers much more rigidity than the prior art “T” connection 225 between analogous components of the repetition base. Thus, the increased rigidity of this design, allows for a reduction in material and mass of the article 40 in the vicinity of area 225 without compromise to the overall rigidity requirement of the piano action 10.
An embodiment of the repetition base 40 includes a balancier support beam 190 that connects with the repetition main beam 180 at a location 220 that is essentially immediately adjacent to the balancier regulating button rest area 200. See
The repetition base 40 also includes a novel connection angle 235 between the repetition main beam 180 and balancier support beam 190. This angle 235 has always been essentially 90 degrees. See
The moment of inertia of a rigid body rotating about a fixed axis is ∫r2 dm, where r is the distance from center of rotation to the differential mass point of the body dm. The moment of inertia of a piano action component can be approximated by: (the distance from center of rotation to the center of mass)2×(mass).
The moment of inertia of a repetition base 40 with rest cushion bracket 60 and rest cushion 50 attached, hereby known as a repetition rest cushion bracket assembly (RBA) 70, can be accurately approximated using the distance from repetition center of rotation 30 to the RBA center of mass center of mass 80—hereafter know as the RBA effective radius 90—and the mass of the RBA. A mode of this invention has a moment of inertia equal to 17,456 gmm2 from a RBA weight of 9.35 grams and RBA effective radius of 43.19 mm.
The moment of inertia of repetition base 40 with rest cushion bracket 60, rest cushion 50, and heel 140 attached, hereby known as a rest cushion bracket heel assembly (RBHA) 100, can be accurately approximated using the distance from repetition center of rotation 30 to the RBHA center of mass center of mass 110—hereafter know as the RBHA effective radius 120—and the mass of the RBHA. A mode of this invention has a moment of inertia equal to 20,861 gmm2 from a RBHA weight of 10.31 grams and RBHA effective radius of 44.97 mm.
The instant application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/762,990 entitled “Grand Piano Composite Piano Action”, filed on Jun. 14, 2007, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein. Claims 1 and 2 of the instant application claim the benefit of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/762,990.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11762990 | Jun 2007 | US |
Child | 11964148 | US |