1. Field of the Invention
This invention pertains to the piano actions of grand pianos and specifically to piano actions that “actuate” or cycle with a substantially smaller energy requirement than other grand piano piano actions.
2. Description of Related Art
Pianists feel improvement in a piano action when the energy requirement to actuate or cycle the action in a particular way is reduced. This is because the work required by pianists' fingers to cycle the action in a particular way is reduced, thereby making the piano more comfortable to play. Reductions in energy requirements to actuate piano actions allow pianists to play music with less finger strength which improves finger control. Thus, the pianist can play in a more virtuoso fashion more easily and the pianist's playing abilities are thereby improved by the new piano action. Accordingly, there is a need for a grand piano piano action that cycles in a particular way from less finger work.
The cycling of a grand piano piano action primarily occurs through rotational motion of action members, causing a hammer to strike piano strings, thereby making piano music. The finger energy requirement to actuate a grand piano piano action is directly proportional to the change in angular momentum of the members of the action system.
Grand piano piano actions consist primarily of: a repetition base, a jack, a balancier, a heel, and a set of two regulating buttons. The repetition base is the largest and heaviest of the grand piano piano action components and also incurs the largest change in inertia or momentum during cycling of the piano action. Thus, the repetition base plays a significant role in the energy requirements to actuate a piano action. Accordingly, there is a need for a repetition base for a grand piano action that incurs less momentum change during the actuation cycle of the piano action.
The heel also incurs a relatively large momentum change during cycling of the action. Accordingly, there is a need for a heel for a grand piano action that incurs less momentum change during the actuation cycle of the piano action.
It is an aspect of this invention to yield a grand piano action that actuates with significantly less energy requirements. As stated in the parent application, this improvement is achieved by redesign of action components using moment analysis as the main factor affecting design rather than mass and rigidity as the key design factors.
It is an aspect of this invention to provide a low inertia repetition base of a grand piano piano action with a main beam and a balancier support beam that are connected at an acute angle where the balancier support beam is angled towards the jack end of the main beam.
It is an aspect of this invention to provide a low inertia repetition base of a grand piano piano action with an integrated jack regulating button stop that stands essentially planar with the longitudinal axes of said main beam and said balancier support beam, and is integrated into the structure of said main beam.
It is an aspect of this invention to provide a low inertia repetition base of a grand piano piano action with a balancier regulating button stop that is adjacent to or contiguous with one end of the balancier support beam of the repetition base.
It is an aspect of this invention to provide a low inertia repetition base of a grand piano piano action with a main beam that includes a main beam angled section where this section has a longitudinal axis that essentially coincides with a hypothetical line between the repetition base center of rotation hinge pin hole and center point-of-contact between the heel and the repetition base.
It is an aspect of this invention to provide a range of low profile lightweight heels with various heights to function in tandem with the preceding aspect in order to greatly reduce the overall angular momentum change of the piano action during an action cycle.
It is an aspect of this invention to provide the option of attaching a rest cushion assembly to the grand piano piano action in order to accommodate grand piano brands requiring such.
Grand piano piano action 10 is depicted in
Prior art repetition base 230 is depicted in
Repetition rest cushion bracket assembly 70 comprises: a repetition base 40, a rest cushion bracket 60, and rest cushion 50. Repetition rest cushion bracket assembly 70 is depicted in
Some grand pianos require the rest cushion 50 to be attached to repetition base 40, while other grand piano designs require attachment of the rest cushion 50 to another part of the piano. Repetition bases 40 of this invention are interchangeable with both types of grand pianos because the rest cushion assembly (50 and 60) can be attached to the repetition base 40 or left off. Thus, repetition base 40 further comprises a rest cushion location and attachment means.
Rest cushion bracket heel assembly 100 comprises: a repetition rest cushion bracket assembly 70 and an attached heel 140. Rest cushion bracket heel assembly 100 is depicted in
An embodiment of this invention includes a repetition base 40 with repetition main beam 180 that is not straight, as with prior art repetition bases, but rather includes at least one angled section 260 that is angled toward the heel 140 of the action 10 and the capstan of the piano key. As shown in
First, a main beam 180 with angled section 260 that extends downward toward the heel 140 of the action allows for a much shorter heel 140. A shorter heel 140 is desirable because shorter heels weigh less than taller heels. Weights of heels 140 are very important to the moment of inertia of the piano action 10 because heels 140 are relatively heavy components of the action 10 that are located relatively far from the repetition center of rotation 30. A main beam 180 with angled section 260 allows for a substantial weight savings in the heel 140. For instance, a mode of heel 140, as depicted in the drawings in this application, weighs 61% less than most heels in the public domain. The main beam angled section 260 is a component of the repetition main beam 180.
Second, the “V” connection with web support 210 between the repetition main beam 180 and the balancier support beam 190 delivers much more rigidity than the prior art “T” connection 225 between analogous components of the repetition base. Thus, the increased rigidity of this design, allows for a reduction in material and mass of the repetition base 40 in the vicinity of area 225 without compromise to the overall rigidity requirement of the piano action 10.
An embodiment of the repetition base 40 includes a balancier support beam 190 that connects with the repetition main beam 180 at a connection location 220 that is essentially immediately adjacent to the balancier regulating button stop 200. Main beam/balancier support beam connection location 220 is a hypothetical location on the repetition base 40, introduced to help articulate description of the invention. Main beam/balancier support beam connection location 220 is defined as a point on the upper surface of the repetition base 40 that lies at the seem between the repetition main beam 180 and the balancier support beam 190. See
Prior art repetition bases have main beam/balancier support beam connection location 220 located relatively far from the balancier regulating button stop 200, typically by a distance 250 that is about 25% of the effective length of the repetition base 240. Repetition base effective length 240 is defined as the distance between repetition center of rotation 30 and jack attachment hinge pin hole 96. See
Repetition base 40 may also includes a novel connection angle 235 between the repetition main beam 180 and balancier support beam 190. This angle 235 has always been essentially 90 degrees. See
The moment of inertia of a rigid body rotating about a fixed axis is ∫r2dm, where r is the distance from center of rotation to the differential mass point of the body dm. The moment of inertia of a piano action component can be approximated by: (the distance from center of rotation to the center of mass)2×(mass).
The moment of inertia of a repetition rest cushion bracket assembly (RBA) 70, can be accurately approximated using the distance from repetition center of rotation 30 to the RBA center of mass center of mass 80—hereafter know as the RBA effective radius 90—and the mass of the RBA 70. A mode of this invention has a moment of inertia equal to 17,456 gmm2 from a RBA weight of 9.35 grams and RBA effective radius of 43.19 mm. This moment is a dramatic improvement over the prior art in that it is substantially less than that of prior art and thus yields a piano action 10 with greatly improved response.
The moment of inertia of a rest cushion bracket heel assembly (RBHA) 100, can be accurately approximated using the distance from repetition center of rotation 30 to the RBHA center of mass center of mass 110—hereafter know as the RBHA effective radius 120—and the mass of the RBHA 100. A mode of this invention has a moment of inertia equal to 20,861 gmm2 from a RBHA weight of 10.31 grams and RBHA effective radius of 44.97 mm. This moment is a dramatic improvement over the prior art in that it is substantially less than that of prior art and thus yields a piano action 10 with greatly improved response.
The instant application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/762,990 entitled “Grand Piano Composite Piano Action”, filed on Jun. 14, 2007, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4685371 | Levinson | Aug 1987 | A |
4774868 | Finholm | Oct 1988 | A |
4953433 | Fandrich | Sep 1990 | A |
4995291 | Takahashi | Feb 1991 | A |
5125309 | Stanwood | Jun 1992 | A |
6509517 | Wroblewski | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6740801 | Yoshisue et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6972359 | Overs | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7057101 | Ishida | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7141728 | Yoshisue | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7279627 | Tanaka | Oct 2007 | B2 |
20040168562 | Yoshisue et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090007750 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11762990 | Jun 2007 | US |
Child | 11964148 | US |