The present invention generally relates to scrambling codes. More specifically, the present invention relates to a method and system for detecting scrambling codes within a W-CDMA communication system.
Code acquisition is a fundamental algorithm required in any direct sequence spread spectrum (DSSS) receiver. Prior to de-spreading, demodulating and decoding frames, such a receiver needs to acquire knowledge of timing information relating to the underlying spreading waveform being used to spread the data-bearing signal. According to the wide-band code division multiple access (W-CDMA) communication system of the 3GPP standards body, upon turning on a mobile terminal or device, a 3-step initial cell search procedure needs to be performed to acquire the primary scrambling code which is used to spread the data bearing channels. Examples of such channels are the primary common pilot channel (P-CPICH) and the dedicated physical channel (DPCH).
The first step of the 3-step initial cell search procedure relates to slot timing. In a W-CDMA communication system, each base station transmits its own scrambling code in frames over the air to a mobile terminal. Each frame is made up of fifteen (15) slots. Before the start of a frame can be located, the start of a slot needs to be identified first. Once the start of a slot is identified, then it can be assured that one of the next fifteen (15) slots represents the start of a frame. Upon conclusion of the first step, the start of a slot is identified.
The second step of the 3-step initial cell search procedure relates to frame timing. As mentioned above, at the end of the first step, the start of a slot is identified. Once that is achieved, the start of a frame can then be identified. Within a W-CDMA communication system, there are five hundred and twelve (512) base stations within the network. The base stations are identified in the network by a network matrix. The network matrix has sixty-four groups (64) and each group has eight (8) cells. A particular base station is identified by its group and its cell position within the group. During this second step, the start of a frame is identified and the mobile terminal can then synchronize to the identified frame and obtain information relating to group identification. Upon conclusion of the second step, the group which contains the base station that sent out the frame (or scrambling code) is identified, i.e., one out of sixty-four (64) group is identified.
Upon completing the first two steps of the initial cell search procedure, the receiver has knowledge of the slot and frame timing of the received scrambling code, such as a P-CPICH signal. The receiver also has knowledge of the group identification of the base station or cell being acquired. The group identification information contains information on all eight (8) primary cells within the group. Since there are eight (8) cells in a group, using the group identification information, the receiver needs only to identify one (1) out of eight (8) possible primary cells from the group.
To achieve this goal, the receiver may use one of two conventional approaches. Under the first approach, the receiver may perform a correlation of the received signals with a parallel bank of eight (8) scrambling code generators (typical correlation length N ranges from 64 to 256 chips based on frequency offset in the received signals). All the eight (8) correlations are performed within N chips, at the expense of using eight (8) parallel scrambling code generators.
Under the second approach, the receiver may sequentially correlate the received signals with eight (8) possible scrambling codes for N chips each. Using a single scrambling code generator, one may attain all eight (8) correlation results after slightly greater than 8*N chips (this number of chips is needed to allow for reassigning the scrambling code generator to another phase offset, after each correlation is performed).
Implementations may not be limited to the above two conventional approaches. The above two approaches were explained for the case of real time processing of the CDMA signal, i.e. no buffering of received data was assumed for these two cases.
As mentioned above, the eight (8) scrambling codes may be generated in parallel, using eight (8) separate scrambling code generators each operating independently, or the eight (8) scrambling codes maybe generated using a single scrambling code generator using eight (8) sets of masks (a set=4 18-bit masks). However, both of these approaches require additional power consumption/silicon area. Under the first approach, additional scrambling code generators are needed; and under the second approach, additional memory storage is needed to store the received signals and it takes additional time to generate and process the necessary scrambling codes in a sequential manner.
Hence, it would be desirable to provide a method and system which is capable of generating scrambling codes for correlation to identify a received scrambling code in a more efficient manner.
An exemplary method of the present invention is used to perform scrambling code detection of eight (8) primary cells (each scrambling code's X-component being spaced sixteen (16) chips apart) in a group. According to the exemplary method, a single scrambling code generator is used to generate a master scrambling code. The master scrambling code is then used to create individual scrambling codes which are used in correlation with received signals to detect in parallel which one of the eight (8) possible primary cells in the group transmitted the received signals. Each individual scrambling code has an X-component and a Y-component. The individual scrambling codes are created based on the fact that the X-component of each cell station's scrambling code's phase reference is spaced sixteen (16) chips apart.
The use of this exemplary method reduces the complexity of scrambling code or PN generator(s) in the parallel search implementation. More specifically, the use of this exemplary method avoids the need to utilize parallel logic to generate eight (8) scrambling codes. Since the X-component of each primary scrambling code within a group is sixteen (16) chips apart, a pair of buffers (one for the X-component and one for the Y-component) is used to store a sequential stream of X- and Y-components of the master scrambling code (typically the first primary code with a group) output respectively from a single scrambling code generator. Since the Y-component is common to all primary cells in the group, the Y-component is correlated with different portions of the X-component (each portion being offset by a multiple of sixteen (16) locations from the X-component buffer) to generate all eight (8) individual scrambling codes in the group. That is, using different 16-chip offsets in the X-component buffers (complex samples) and a common Y-component buffer (complex samples), all eight (8) different complex individual scrambling codes can be generated. The received data is then correlated in parallel with each of the eight (8) individual scrambling codes generated from the master scrambling code. Eight dimensions are mapped to a single dimension at the expense of a slight increase in storage size.
This exemplary method can be used as part of an overall 3-step initial cell search procedure to acquire the downlink of a 3GPP WCDMA cell, which more specifically corresponds to part of the stage 3 portion of the cell search procedure.
According to an exemplary implementation of the exemplary method of the present invention, the exemplary implementation includes a single scrambling code generator and eight (8) correlators arranged in sequential order. Each of the correlators maintains a corresponding segment of the master scrambling code's X-component and a common segment of the Y-component. For every sixteen (16) chips, a new segment of the master scrambling code's X-component is introduced into one of the correlators by the scrambling code generator, a segment of the master scrambling code's X-component is dropped from another correlator, and segments of the master scrambling code's X-component are sequentially shifted or propagated through the remaining correlators; and concurrent correlations are performed by the correlators using their respective corresponding segments of the master scrambling code and newly received signals. The foregoing process is repeated until a desired correlation length is achieved.
Reference to the remaining portions of the specification, including the drawings and claims, will realize other features and advantages of the present invention. Further features and advantages of the present invention, as well as the structure and operation of various embodiments of the present invention, are described in detail below with respect to accompanying drawings, like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements.
b is a simplified diagram illustrating the timing of the Y-components of the scrambling codes of the eight (8) cells within a group;
a and 6b are simplified diagrams illustrating a second exemplary implementation of the exemplary method in accordance with the present invention;
a is a diagram illustrating correlation results generated by the exemplary method shown in
b is a diagram illustrating correlation results generated after one iteration by the exemplary implementation shown in
The present invention in the form of one or more exemplary embodiments will now be discussed. The present invention can be applied to the third step of the initial cell search procedure when a mobile terminal is initially powered on to identify the base station or cell which transmitted the received signals containing a scrambling code. FIG. la is a simplified diagram illustrating the timing of the X-components of the scrambling codes of the eight (8) cells within a group. Referring to
According to one exemplary method of the present invention, a scrambling code represented by the received signals is identified by using a single scrambling code generator to attain N chip correlation of the received signals with eight (8) primary scrambling codes in a group within N+16*7=N+112 chips.
The following is an example illustrating the exemplary method of the present invention. The example is based on the following assumptions: the correlation length N is two hundred and fifty-six (256); the chip offset CO is sixteen (16); and the number of cells C within the identified group is eight (8). The period of the master scrambling code is thirty-eight thousand and four hundred (38,400) chips.
Next, three hundred and sixty-eight (368) chips (X0−>X367) of the master scrambling code's X-component, as well as two hundred and fifty-six (256) chips (Y0−>Y255) of the master scrambling code's Y-component, are generated from a single scrambling code generator tuned to the first primary cell of the underlying identified group. The length of three hundred and sixty-eight (368) chips is determined based on the formula N+CO*(C−1) which, in this case, equals to 256+16*(8−1)=256+16*7=256+112=368. The length of chips for the Y-component is determined by the correlation length N, which in this case is two hundred and fifty-six (256). It should be noted that it is not necessary to generate all three hundred and sixty-eight (368) chips and all two hundred and fifty-six (256) Y-component chips prior to correlation. The generation of three hundred and sixty-eight (368) chips is specified to emphasize the total number of chips required out of the scrambling code generator's X-component to implement eight (8) parallel correlations of two hundred and fifty-six (256) chips each.
The exemplary method of the present invention as described may be implemented in software, hardware or a combination of both. For example, the exemplary method of the present invention may be implemented as control logic using software embedded in a mobile terminal. When implemented using software, the exemplary method may be implemented in a modular or integrated manner within the mobile terminal. Based on disclosure provided herein, a person of ordinary skill in the art will know of other ways and/or methods to implement the present invention.
Referring to
At 52, a set of received signals are captured. The duration of the capture period equals to the chip offset between the X-components of the respective scrambling codes of two adjacent cells within a group. For a W-CDMA communication system, the duration of the capture period is thus sixteen (16) chips.
At 54, the set of received signals arc correlated with the generated portion of the master scrambling code by the correlators and the correlation results are stored. After the correlations are performed, at 56, each correlator shifts or propagates its segment of the X-component of the generated portion of the master scrambling code to its neighboring correlator and shares a common Y-component segment. The exception being that, at 58, the first correlator discards its current segment of the X-component and the last correlator receives a newly generated segment of the X-component from the single scrambling code generator. In addition, at 58, segments of the Y-component from all the correlators are discarded and a newly generated segment of the Y-component is loaded into all the correlators in parallel. As a result, at any given time, all the correlators share the same segment of the Y-component. Then, the process returns to 52 where the next set of received signals are captured and correlated. The foregoing process is repeated until the entire master scrambling code is generated and correlated. From an alternative perspective, this can be viewed as segments of the X-component of the master scrambling code being correlated in a pipelined fashion on a first-in-first-out basis.
a and 6b are simplified block diagrams illustrating an exemplary physical implementation of the exemplary method described above. Referring to
The exemplary system 60 operates as follows. Initially, before any correlation is performed, the correlators COR0-COR7 64-78 are collectively populated with a portion of the master scrambling code's X- and Y-components by the single scrambling code generator 62. The portion of the X-component of the master scrambling code that is initially generated is one hundred and twenty-eight (128=16*8) chips in length (X0−>X127) and the portion of the Y-component that is initially generated is sixteen (16) chips in length. The portion of the X-component of the master scrambling code is segmented and populated into the correlators COR0-COR7 64-78 and the portion of the Y-component is loaded in parallel into all the correlators COR0-COR7 64-78. Each correlator has a length of sixteen (16). For example, after initial population, correlator COR0 78 includes scrambling code segment X0-X15; correlator COR1 76 includes segment X16-X31; and correlator COR7 64 includes segment X112-X127; and so on. In addition, all the correlators COR0-COR7 64-78 also include scrambling code segment Y0-Y15. It should be noted that the initial generation of all one hundred and twenty-eight (128) chips of the portion of the X-component of the master scrambling code and the sixteen (16) chips of the portion of the Y-component of the master scrambling code before starting any of the correlations is not required. One of the correlators 64-78 can be started every sixteen (16) chips in a pipelined fashion.
Next, a set of complex data signals or samples which is sixteen (16) chips in length, D0-D15, are received and fed to each of the correlators 64-78. Then, each correlator partially correlates the same set of received complex data samples with the complex conjugate of its corresponding scrambling code segment. The corresponding scrambling segment includes a portion of the X-component and a portion of the Y-component. It is to be noted that the respective X-components of the scrambling code segments of any two adjacent correlators have a chip offset of sixteen (16) chips and that the same portion of the Y-component is shared by all the correlators 64-78. For example, the first correlator COR0 78 correlates the received data samples, D0-D15, with the complex conjugate of its corresponding scrambling code segment, (X0−>X15)+j(Y0−>Y15); the second correlator COR1 76 correlates the received data samples, D0-D15, with the complex conjugate of its corresponding scrambling code segment, (X16−>X31)+j(Y0−>Y15); and so on, and the final correlator COR7 64 correlates the received data samples, D0-D15, with the complex conjugate of its corresponding scrambling code segment, (X112−>X127)+j(Y0−>Y0−Y15). The correlations of the eight (8) correlators 64-78 are performed concurrently in a parallel manner and the correlation results are stored for subsequent evaluation.
After this first iteration of correlations, each correlator passes its current corresponding scrambling code segment (X-component) to a neighboring correlator. It should be noted that each correlator has two neighboring correlators. In effect, with two exceptions which will be described below, this means each correlator also receives a new corresponding scramble code segment (X-component) from another neighboring correlator. Graphically, this is shown as follows: COR1−>COR0, COR2−>COR1, COR3−>COR2, COR4−>COR3, COR5−>COR4, COR6−>COR5. In essence, the scrambling code segments (X-components) are shifted or propagated along the correlators 64-78. The two exceptions are the first correlator COR0 78 and the last correlator COR7 64. For the first correlator COR0 78, its current corresponding scramble code segment (X-component) is discarded; and for the last correlator COR7 64, a new scrambling code segment (X-component) generated by the single scrambling code generator 62 is fed to the last correlator COR7 64. The newly generated scrambling code segment (X-component) is the next segment of the master scrambling code that follows the scrambling code segment (X-component) that was in the last correlator COR7 64 before that scrambling code segment (X-component) was transferred to correlator COR6 66. For example, after the first iteration, the newly generated scrambling code segment (X-component) to be fed into the last correlator COR7 64 is X128-X143. This is because scrambling code segment (X-component) X128-X143 follows scrambling code segment (X-component) X128-X127 within the master scrambling code. By shifting or transferring the scrambling code segments as described above, the entire master scrambling code is propagated along all the correlators 64-78 and is eventually correlated with the received data samples as described in
The next set of complex data samples are received, D16-D31, and loaded into the correlators 64-78. Another iteration of concurrent correlations by the correlators 64-78 is then performed again. The foregoing process of shifting the scrambling code segments, receiving the next set of complex data samples and performing another iteration of correlations is repeated until the master scrambling code is correlated or, conversely, the collective length of all the received complex data samples reaches the correlation length.
a illustrates the correlation results generated using the exemplary method shown in
As can be seen above, scrambling code segments (X- and Y-components) which make up the master scrambling code are internally shared amongst correlators 64-78. For every predetermined period (that is defined by the chip offset between the respective scrambling codes of any two adjacent cells within a group), e.g., sixteen (16) chips, the corresponding scrambling code segment (X-component) of each correlator is refreshed or updated. This sharing of scrambling code segments reduces the access to the otherwise globally stored master scrambling code by a factor of eight (8) (for cases using the above assumptions), i.e., 2N scrambling code read accesses are required every N chips of correlations.
In addition, for every iteration of correlations, the scrambling code generator 62 transfers or generates only 2*2N/16 binary values to one of the correlators 64-78. As mentioned above, the rest of the correlators 66-78 internally share the scrambling code segments which are already present amongst the correlators 64-78.
To further reduce scrambling code memory access as well as each correlator's working size, the technique of packing and unpacking bits may be used. If the above binary values were packed into a word and then unpacked at the time of correlation, the scrambling code generator 62 then needs to transfer only 2*2N/(16*16) 16-bit words to the group of correlators 64-78. That is, the working size of each correlator may be reduced to 2*2N/(16*16) by packing sixteen (16) bits at a time. This also reduces scrambling code storage access to 2*2N/16.
Furthermore, it is understood that while the present invention as described above is applicable to a W-CDMA communication system, it should be clear to a person of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention can be applied to other types of communication systems.
Moreover, it should be noted that the present invention as described herein may be implemented in a number of ways. For example, the present invention may be implemented using the adaptive computing architecture as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/815,122, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,836,839, entitled “ADAPTIVE INTEGRATED CIRCUITRY WITH HETEROGENEOUS AND RECONFIGURABLE MATRICES OF DIVERSE AND ADAPTIVE COMPUTATIONAL UNITS HAVING FIXED, APPLICATION SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL ELEMENTS,” filed on Mar. 22, 2001, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety as if set forth in full herein for all purposes. For instance, using the adaptive computing architecture, the scrambling code generator 62 and the correlators 64-78 may be implemented on demand within a mobile terminal. Based on the disclosure provided herein, a person of ordinary skill in the art will know of other ways and/or methods to implement and apply the present invention.
It is further understood that the examples and embodiments described herein are for illustrative purposes only and that various modifications or changes in light thereof will be suggested to persons skilled in the art and are to be included within the spirit and purview of this application and scope of the appended claims. All publications, patents, and patent applications cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes in their entirety.
The present application is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 11/797,583, filed May 4, 2007, which is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 10/295,692, filed Nov. 14, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,215,701, which is a Continuation-In-Part application of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/015,531, filed on Dec. 12, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,088,825, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety as if set forth in full herein for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3409175 | Byrne | Nov 1968 | A |
3665171 | Morrow | May 1972 | A |
3666143 | Weston | May 1972 | A |
3938639 | Birrell | Feb 1976 | A |
3949903 | Benasutti et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
3960298 | Birrell | Jun 1976 | A |
3967062 | Dobias | Jun 1976 | A |
3991911 | Shannon et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
3995441 | McMillin | Dec 1976 | A |
4076145 | Zygiel | Feb 1978 | A |
4143793 | McMillin et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4172669 | Edelbach | Oct 1979 | A |
4174872 | Fessler | Nov 1979 | A |
4181242 | Zygiel et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
RE30301 | Zygiel | Jun 1980 | E |
4218014 | Tracy | Aug 1980 | A |
4222972 | Caldwell | Sep 1980 | A |
4237536 | Enelow et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4252253 | Shannon | Feb 1981 | A |
4302775 | Widergren et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4333587 | Fessler et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4354613 | Desai et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4377246 | McMillin et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4380046 | Fung et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4393468 | New | Jul 1983 | A |
4413752 | McMillin et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4458584 | Annese et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4466342 | Basile et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4475448 | Shoaf et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4509690 | Austin et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4520950 | Jeans | Jun 1985 | A |
4549675 | Austin | Oct 1985 | A |
4553573 | McGarrah | Nov 1985 | A |
4560089 | McMillin et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4577782 | Fessler | Mar 1986 | A |
4578799 | Scholl et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
RE32179 | Sedam et al. | Jun 1986 | E |
4633386 | Terepin et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4658988 | Hassell | Apr 1987 | A |
4694416 | Wheeler et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4711374 | Gaunt et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4713755 | Worley, Jr. et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4719056 | Scott | Jan 1988 | A |
4726494 | Scott | Feb 1988 | A |
4747516 | Baker | May 1988 | A |
4748585 | Chiarulli et al. | May 1988 | A |
4758985 | Carter | Jul 1988 | A |
4760525 | Webb | Jul 1988 | A |
4760544 | Lamb | Jul 1988 | A |
4765513 | McMillin et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4766548 | Cedrone et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4781309 | Vogel | Nov 1988 | A |
4800492 | Johnson et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4811214 | Nosenchuck et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4824075 | Holzboog | Apr 1989 | A |
4827426 | Patton et al. | May 1989 | A |
4850269 | Hancock et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4856684 | Gerstung | Aug 1989 | A |
4870302 | Freeman | Sep 1989 | A |
4901887 | Burton | Feb 1990 | A |
4905231 | Leung et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4921315 | Metcalfe et al. | May 1990 | A |
4930666 | Rudick | Jun 1990 | A |
4932564 | Austin et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4936488 | Austin | Jun 1990 | A |
4937019 | Scott | Jun 1990 | A |
4960261 | Scott et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4961533 | Teller et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4967340 | Dawes | Oct 1990 | A |
4974643 | Bennett et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4982876 | Scott | Jan 1991 | A |
4993604 | Gaunt et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5007560 | Sassak | Apr 1991 | A |
5021947 | Campbell et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5040106 | Maag | Aug 1991 | A |
5044171 | Farkas | Sep 1991 | A |
5090015 | Dabbish et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5099418 | Pian et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5129549 | Austin | Jul 1992 | A |
5139708 | Scott | Aug 1992 | A |
5144166 | Camarota et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5156301 | Hassell et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5156871 | Goulet et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5165023 | Gifford | Nov 1992 | A |
5165575 | Scott | Nov 1992 | A |
5177700 | Göckler | Jan 1993 | A |
5190083 | Gupta et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5190189 | Zimmer et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5193151 | Jain | Mar 1993 | A |
5193718 | Hassell et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5202993 | Tarsy et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5203474 | Haynes | Apr 1993 | A |
5218240 | Camarota et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5240144 | Feldman | Aug 1993 | A |
5245227 | Furtek et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5261099 | Bigo et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5263509 | Cherry et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5269442 | Vogel | Dec 1993 | A |
5280711 | Motta et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5297400 | Benton et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5301100 | Wagner | Apr 1994 | A |
5303846 | Shannon | Apr 1994 | A |
5335276 | Thompson et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5336950 | Popli et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5339428 | Burmeister et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5343716 | Swanson et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5361362 | Benkeser et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5367651 | Smith et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5367687 | Tarsy et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368198 | Goulet | Nov 1994 | A |
5379343 | Grube et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5381546 | Servi et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5381550 | Jourdenais et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5388062 | Knutson | Feb 1995 | A |
5388212 | Grube et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5392960 | Kendt et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5437395 | Bull et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5450557 | Kopp et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5454406 | Rejret et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465368 | Davidson et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5475856 | Kogge | Dec 1995 | A |
5479055 | Eccles | Dec 1995 | A |
5490165 | Blakeney, II et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5491823 | Ruttenberg | Feb 1996 | A |
5504891 | Motoyama et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507009 | Grube et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5515519 | Yoshioka et al. | May 1996 | A |
5517600 | Shimokawa | May 1996 | A |
5519694 | Brewer et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522070 | Sumimoto | May 1996 | A |
5530964 | Alpert et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534796 | Edwards | Jul 1996 | A |
5542265 | Rutland | Aug 1996 | A |
5553755 | Bonewald et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5555417 | Odnert et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560028 | Sachs et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560038 | Haddock | Sep 1996 | A |
5570587 | Kim | Nov 1996 | A |
5572572 | Kawan et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5590353 | Sakakibara et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594657 | Cantone et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600810 | Ohkami | Feb 1997 | A |
5600844 | Shaw et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5602833 | Zehavi | Feb 1997 | A |
5603043 | Taylor et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607083 | Vogel et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5608643 | Wichter et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5611867 | Cooper et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5623545 | Childs et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625669 | McGregor et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626407 | Westcott | May 1997 | A |
5630206 | Urban et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635940 | Hickman et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646544 | Iadanza | Jul 1997 | A |
5646545 | Trimberger et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5647512 | Assis Mascarenhas deOliveira et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5667110 | McCann et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5684793 | Kiema et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5684980 | Casselman | Nov 1997 | A |
5687236 | Moskowitz et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694613 | Suzuki | Dec 1997 | A |
5694794 | Jerg et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699328 | Ishizaki et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701398 | Glier et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701482 | Harrison et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5704053 | Santhanam | Dec 1997 | A |
5706191 | Bassett et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5706976 | Purkey | Jan 1998 | A |
5712996 | Schepers | Jan 1998 | A |
5720002 | Wang | Feb 1998 | A |
5721693 | Song | Feb 1998 | A |
5721854 | Ebicioglu et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5729754 | Estes | Mar 1998 | A |
5732563 | Bethuy et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734808 | Takeda | Mar 1998 | A |
5737631 | Trimberger | Apr 1998 | A |
5742180 | DeHon et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742821 | Prasanna | Apr 1998 | A |
5745366 | Highma et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
RE35780 | Hassell et al. | May 1998 | E |
5751295 | Becklund et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754227 | Fukuoka | May 1998 | A |
5758261 | Wiedeman | May 1998 | A |
5768561 | Wise | Jun 1998 | A |
5778439 | Trimberger et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784636 | Rupp | Jul 1998 | A |
5787237 | Reilly | Jul 1998 | A |
5790817 | Asghar et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5791517 | Avital | Aug 1998 | A |
5791523 | Oh | Aug 1998 | A |
5794062 | Baxter | Aug 1998 | A |
5794067 | Kadowaki | Aug 1998 | A |
5802055 | Krein et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812851 | Levy et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818603 | Motoyama | Oct 1998 | A |
5819255 | Celis et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822308 | Weigand et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822313 | Malek et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822360 | Lee et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828858 | Athanas et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829085 | Jerg et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835753 | Witt | Nov 1998 | A |
5838165 | Chatter | Nov 1998 | A |
5845815 | Vogel | Dec 1998 | A |
5854929 | Van Pract et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5860021 | Klingman | Jan 1999 | A |
5862961 | Motta et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5870427 | Tiedemann, Jr. et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873045 | Lee et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5881106 | Cartier | Mar 1999 | A |
5884284 | Peters et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5886537 | Macias et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887174 | Simons et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889816 | Agrawal et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889989 | Robertazzi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890014 | Long | Mar 1999 | A |
5892900 | Ginter et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5892950 | Rigori et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5892961 | Trimberger | Apr 1999 | A |
5892962 | Cloutier | Apr 1999 | A |
5894473 | Dent | Apr 1999 | A |
5901884 | Goulet et al. | May 1999 | A |
5903886 | Heimlich et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907285 | Toms et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907580 | Cummings | May 1999 | A |
5910733 | Bertolet et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5912572 | Graf, III | Jun 1999 | A |
5913172 | McCabe et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917852 | Butterfield et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920801 | Thomas et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931918 | Row et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933642 | Greenbaum et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940438 | Poon et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949415 | Lin et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5950011 | Albrecht et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5950131 | Vilmur | Sep 1999 | A |
5951674 | Moreno | Sep 1999 | A |
5953322 | Kimball | Sep 1999 | A |
5956518 | DeHon et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956967 | Kim | Sep 1999 | A |
5959811 | Richardson | Sep 1999 | A |
5959881 | Trimberger et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963048 | Harrison et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966534 | Cooke et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970254 | Cooke et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987105 | Jenkins et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987611 | Freund | Nov 1999 | A |
5991302 | Berl et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991308 | Fuhrmann et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993739 | Lyon | Nov 1999 | A |
5999734 | Willis et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005943 | Cohen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006249 | Leong | Dec 1999 | A |
6016395 | Mohamed | Jan 2000 | A |
6021186 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6021492 | May | Feb 2000 | A |
6023742 | Ebeling et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023755 | Casselman | Feb 2000 | A |
6028610 | Deering | Feb 2000 | A |
6036166 | Olson | Mar 2000 | A |
6039219 | Bach et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041322 | Meng et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041970 | Vogel | Mar 2000 | A |
6046603 | New | Apr 2000 | A |
6047115 | Mohan et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052600 | Fette et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055314 | Spies et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056194 | Kolls | May 2000 | A |
6059840 | Click, Jr. | May 2000 | A |
6061580 | Altschul et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073132 | Gehman | Jun 2000 | A |
6076174 | Freund | Jun 2000 | A |
6078736 | Guccione | Jun 2000 | A |
6085740 | Ivri et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088043 | Kelleher et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091263 | New et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091765 | Pietzold, III et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094065 | Tavana et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094726 | Gonion et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6111893 | Volftsun et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111935 | Hughes-Hartogs | Aug 2000 | A |
6112218 | Gandhi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115751 | Tam et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119178 | Martin et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120551 | Law et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122670 | Bennett et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128307 | Brown | Oct 2000 | A |
6134605 | Hudson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138693 | Matz | Oct 2000 | A |
6141283 | Bogin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6150838 | Wittig et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154494 | Sugahara et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157997 | Oowaki et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6158031 | Mack et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173389 | Pechanek et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175854 | Bretscher | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175892 | Sazzad et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181981 | Varga et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185418 | MacLellan et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192070 | Poon et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192255 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192388 | Cajolet | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195788 | Leaver et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198924 | Ishii et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199181 | Rechef et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202130 | Scales, III et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202189 | Hinedi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219697 | Lawande et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219756 | Kasamizugami | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219780 | Lipasti | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223222 | Fijolek et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226387 | Tewfik et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230307 | Davis et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237029 | Master et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246883 | Lee | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6247125 | Noel-Baron et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249251 | Chang et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258725 | Lee et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263057 | Silverman | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266760 | DeHon et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272579 | Lentz et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272616 | Fernando et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279020 | Dujardin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281703 | Furuta et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282627 | Wong et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286134 | Click, Jr. et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289375 | Knight et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289434 | Roy | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289488 | Dave et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292822 | Hardwick | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292827 | Raz | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292830 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292938 | Sarkar et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301653 | Mohamed et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6305014 | Roediger et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311149 | Ryan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321985 | Kolls | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326806 | Fallside et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6346824 | New | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6347346 | Taylor | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349394 | Brock et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353841 | Marshall et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356994 | Barry et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359248 | Mardi | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360256 | Lim | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360259 | Bradley | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360263 | Kurtzberg et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363411 | Dugan et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366999 | Drabenstott et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377983 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378072 | Collins et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381293 | Lee et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381735 | Hunt | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385751 | Wolf | May 2002 | B1 |
6405214 | Meade, II | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408039 | Ito | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6410941 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411612 | Halford et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6421372 | Bierly et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421809 | Wuytack et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426649 | Fu et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430624 | Jamtgaard et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433578 | Wasson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434590 | Blelloch et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438737 | Morelli et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446258 | McKinsey et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449747 | Wuytack et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6456996 | Crawford, Jr. et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459883 | Subramanian et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6467009 | Winegarden et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469540 | Nakaya | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6473609 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6483343 | Faith et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6507947 | Schreiber et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510138 | Pannell | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510510 | Garde | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6526570 | Click, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6538470 | Langhammer et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6556044 | Langhammer et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6563891 | Eriksson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6570877 | Kloth et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6577678 | Scheuermann | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6587684 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6590415 | Agrawal et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6601086 | Howard et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601158 | Abbott et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604085 | Kolls | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6604189 | Zemlyak et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606529 | Crowder, Jr. et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615333 | Hoogerbrugge et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618434 | Heidari-Bateni et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6640304 | Ginter et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6647429 | Semal | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6653859 | Sihlbom et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6675265 | Barroso et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6675284 | Warren | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6691148 | Zinky et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6694380 | Wolrich et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6711617 | Bantz et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718182 | Kung | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6718541 | Ostanevich et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6721286 | Williams et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721884 | De Oliveira Kastrup Pereira et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732354 | Ebeling et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6735621 | Yoakum et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6738744 | Kirovski et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6748360 | Pitman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751723 | Kundu et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754470 | Hendrickson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760587 | Holtzman et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6760833 | Dowling | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6766165 | Sharma et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6778212 | Deng et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785341 | Walton et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6819140 | Yamanaka et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6823448 | Roth et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829633 | Gelfer et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6832250 | Coons et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836836 | Shinozaki | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836839 | Master et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6854002 | Conway et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6859434 | Segal et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6865664 | Budrovic et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871236 | Fishman et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6883084 | Donohoe | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6894996 | Lee | May 2005 | B2 |
6901440 | Bimm et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6912515 | Jackson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6941336 | Mar | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6980515 | Schunk et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6985517 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6986021 | Master et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6986142 | Ehlig et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6988139 | Jervis et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7032229 | Flores et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7044741 | Leem | May 2006 | B2 |
7050486 | Yasaki | May 2006 | B2 |
7082456 | Mani-Meitav et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7088825 | Sambhwani et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7139910 | Ainsworth et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7142731 | Toi | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7215701 | Sambhwani et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7249242 | Ramchandran | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7668229 | Sambhwani et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
20010003191 | Kovacs et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010023482 | Wray | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010029515 | Mirsky | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034795 | Moulton et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010039654 | Miyamoto | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010048713 | Medlock et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010048714 | Jha | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010050948 | Ramberg et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010848 | Kamano et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013799 | Blaker | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013937 | Ostanevich et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015435 | Rieken | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020015439 | Kohli et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023210 | Tuomenoksa et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020024942 | Tsuneki et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020024993 | Subramanian et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020031166 | Subramanian et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032551 | Zakiya | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035623 | Lawande et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020041581 | Aramaki | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020042875 | Shukla | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020042907 | Yamanaka et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020061741 | Leung et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069282 | Reisman | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020072830 | Hunt | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078337 | Moreau et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083305 | Renard et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083423 | Ostanevich et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087829 | Snyder et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020089348 | Langhammer | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020101909 | Chen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107905 | Roe et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107962 | Richter et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020119803 | Bitterlich et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120672 | Butt et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133688 | Lee et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138716 | Master et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141489 | Imaizumi | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147845 | Sanchez-Herrero et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159503 | Ramachandran | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162026 | Neuman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020167997 | Kim et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020168018 | Scheuermann | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181559 | Heidari-Bateni et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184275 | Dutta et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184291 | Hogenauer | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184498 | Qi | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191790 | Anand et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030007606 | Suder et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012270 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018446 | Makowski et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018700 | Giroti et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023649 | Kamiya et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023830 | Hogenauer | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026242 | Jokinen et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030030004 | Dixon et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046421 | Horvitz et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061260 | Rajkumar | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061311 | Lo | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063656 | Rao et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074473 | Pham et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076815 | Miller et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030099223 | Chang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030102889 | Master et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030105949 | Master et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030108203 | Sambhwani et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110485 | Lu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030123666 | Sambhwani et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030142818 | Raghunathan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154357 | Master et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163723 | Kozuch et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172138 | McCormack et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172139 | Srinivasan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030200538 | Ebeling et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212684 | Meyer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229864 | Watkins | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040006584 | Vandeweerd | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010645 | Scheuermann et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015970 | Scheuermann | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040025159 | Scheuermann et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040057505 | Valio | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040062300 | McDonough et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081248 | Parolari | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040086027 | Shattil | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093479 | Ramchandran | May 2004 | A1 |
20040168044 | Ramchandran | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040174932 | Warke et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050044344 | Stevens | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050166038 | Wang et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050190871 | Sedarat | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198199 | Dowling | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060031660 | Master et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070217486 | Sambhwani et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20090268789 | Sambhwani et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100 18 374 | Oct 2001 | DE |
0 301 169 | Feb 1989 | EP |
0 166 586 | Jan 1991 | EP |
0 236 633 | May 1991 | EP |
0 478 624 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0 479 102 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0 661 831 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0 668 659 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0 690 588 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0 691 754 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0 768 602 | Apr 1997 | EP |
0 817 003 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0 821 495 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0 866 210 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0 923 247 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0 926 596 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1 056 217 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1056217 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1 061 437 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 061 443 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 126 368 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1 150 506 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1 189 358 | Mar 2002 | EP |
189358 | Mar 2002 | EP |
2 067 800 | Jul 1981 | GB |
2 237 908 | May 1991 | GB |
62-249456 | Oct 1987 | JP |
63-147258 | Jun 1988 | JP |
4-51546 | Feb 1992 | JP |
7-064789 | Mar 1995 | JP |
7066718 | Mar 1995 | JP |
10233676 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10254696 | Sep 1998 | JP |
11296345 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000315731 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-053703 | Feb 2001 | JP |
WO 8905029 | Jun 1989 | WO |
WO 8911443 | Nov 1989 | WO |
WO 9100238 | Jan 1991 | WO |
WO 9313603 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO 9511855 | May 1995 | WO |
WO 9633558 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9832071 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9903776 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9921094 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9926860 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 9965818 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0019311 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0065855 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0069073 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0111281 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0122235 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0176129 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0212978 | Feb 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Abnous et al., “Ultra-Low-Power Domain-Specific Multimedia Processors,” VLSI Signal Processing, IX, 1998, IEEE Workshop in San Francisco, CA, USA, Oct. 30-Nov. 1, 1998, pp. 461-470. |
Aggarwal et al.., “Efficient Huffman Decoding,” International Conference on Image Processing IEEE 1:936-939 (Sep. 10-13, 2000). |
Allan et al., “Software Pipelining,” ACM Computing Surveys, 27(3):1-78 (Sep. 1995). |
Alsolaim et al., “Architecture and Application of a Dynamically Reconfigurable Hardware Array for Future Mobile Communication Systems,” Field Programmable Custom Computing Machines, 2000 IEEE Symposium, Napa Valley, Los Alamitos, CA. IEEE Comput. Soc. pp. 205-214 (Apr. 17-19, 2000). |
Ashenden et al., “The VHDL Cookbook,” Dept. Computer Science, University of Adelaide, South Australia. Downloaded from http://tams-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/vhdl/doc/cookbook/VHDL-Cookbook.pdf on Dec. 7, 2006 (Jul. 1990). |
Bacon et al., “Compiler Transformations for High-Performance Computing,” ACM Computing Surveys 26(4):368-373 (Dec. 1994). |
Balasubramonian et al., “Reducing the Complexity of the Register File in Dynamic Superscalar Processors,” Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pp. 237-248 (Dec. 1, 2001). |
Banerjee et al., “A MATLAB Compiler for Distributed, Heterogeneous, Reconfigurable Computing Systems,” 2000 IEEE Symposium, pp. 39-48, (Apr. 17-19, 2000). |
Bapte et al., “Uniform Execution Environment for Dynamic Reconfiguration,” Darpa Adaptive Computing Systems, http://isis.vanderbilt.edu/publications/archive/babty—T—#—0—1999—Uniform—Ex.pdf, pp. 1-7 (1999). |
Baumgarte et al., “PACT XPP—A Self-Reconfigurable Data Processing Architecture,” NN www.pactcorp.com/sneu/download/ersa01.pdf; retrieved on Nov. 25, 2005 (Jun. 25, 2001). |
Becker et al., “An Application-Tailored Dynamically Reconfigurable Hardware Architecture for Digital Baseband Processing,” IEEE Conference Proceedings Article pp. 341-346 (Sep. 18, 2000). |
Becker et al., “Design and Implementation of a Coarse-Grained Dynamically Reconfigurable Hardware Architecture,” VLSI 2001, Proceedings IEEE Computer Soc. Workshop, Piscataway, NJ, USA, pp. 41-46 (Apr. 19-20, 2001). |
Bevstar, BevStar Bottled Water Model Advertisement Automatic Merchandiser at www.AMonline.com (2005). |
Bevstar, BevStar Point of Use Water Model Advertisement Automatic Merchandiser at www.AMonline.com (2005). |
Bishop & Loucks, “A Heterogeneous Environment for Hardware/Software Cosimulation,” Proceedings of the 30th Annual Simulation Symposium, pp. 14-22 (Apr. 7-9, 1997). |
Brakensiek et al., “Re-Configurable Multi-Standard Terminal for Heterogeneous Networks,” Radio and Wireless Conference, Rawcon 2002 IEEE. pp. 27-30 (2002). |
Brown et al., “Quick PDA Data Exchange,” PC Magazine pp. 1-3 (May 22, 2001). |
Buck et al., “Ptolemy: A Framework for Simulating and Prototyping Heterogeneous Systems,” International Journal of Computer Simulation 4:155-182 (Apr. 1994). |
Burns et al., “A Dynamic Reconfiguration Run-Time System,” Proceedings of the 5th Annual Symposium on Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines, pp. 166-175 (Apr. 16, 1997). |
Business Wire, “Whirlpool Internet-Enabled Appliances to Use Beeline Shopper Software Features,” http://www.whirlpoocorp.com/news/releases/release.asp?rid=90 (Feb. 16, 2001). |
Buttazzo et al., “Optimal Deadline Assignment for Scheduling Soft Aperiodic Tasks in Hard Real-Time Environments,” Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Como, pp. 39-48 (Sep. 8, 1997). |
Callahan et al., “Adapting Software Pipelining for Reconfigurable Computing,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Compilers, Architectrue and Synthesis for Embedded Systems p. 8, ACM (Cases '00, San Jose, CA) (Nov. 17-18, 2000). |
Chapman & Mehrotra, “OpenMP and HPF: Integrating Two Paradigms,” Proceedings of the 4th International Euro-Par Conference (Euro-Par'98), Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1470:650-658 (1998). |
Chen et al., “A Reconfigurable Multiprocessor IC for Rapid Prototyping of Algorithmic-Specific High-Speed DSP Data Paths,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, IEEE 35:74-75 (Feb. 1, 2001). |
Clarke, “Embedded Solutions Enters Development Pact with Marconi,” EETimes Online (Jan. 26, 2000). |
Compton & Hauck, “Reconfigurable Computing: A Survey of Systems and Software,” ACM Press, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 34(2):171-210 (Jun. 2002). |
Compton et al., “Configuration Relocation and Defragmentation for Run-Time Reconfigurable Computing,” Northwestern University, http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/compton00configuration.html, pp. 1-17 (2000). |
Conte et al., “Dynamic Rescheduling: A Technique for Object Code Compatibility in VLIW Architectures,” Proceedings of the 28th Annulal International Symposium on Microarchitecture pp. 208-218 (Nov. 29, 1995). |
Conte et al., “Instruction Fetch Mechanisms for VLIW Architectures with Compressed Encodings,” Proceedings of the Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO) 29:201-211 (Dec. 2, 1996). |
Cray Research Inc., “Cray T3E Fortran Optimization Guide,” Ver. 004-2518-002, Section 4.5 (Jan. 1999). |
Cummings et al., “FPGA in the Software Radio,” IEEE Communications Magazine . 37(2):108-112 (Feb. 1999). |
Dandalis et al., “An Adaptive Cryptograhic Engine for IPSec Architectures,” IEEE pp. 132-141 (Jan. 2000). |
David et al., “DART: A Dynamically Reconfigurable Architecture Dealing with Future Mobile Telecommunication Constraints,” Proceedings of the International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium pp. 156-163 (Apr. 15, 2002). |
Deepakumara et al., “FPGA Implementation of MD5 has Algorithm,” Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, IEEE (2001). |
Dehon et al., “Reconfigurable Computing: What, Why and Implications for Design Automation,” Design Automation Conference Proceedings pp. 610-615 (1999). |
Dipert, “Figuring Out Reconfigurable Logic,” EDN 44(16):107-114 (Aug. 5, 1999). |
Dominikus, “A Hardware Implementation of MD4-Family Hash Algorithms,” 9th International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems IEEE (2002). |
Dorband, “aCe C Language Reference Guide,” Online (Archived Mar. 2001), http://web.archive.org/web/20000616053819/http://newton.gsfc.nasa.gov/aCe/aCe—dir/aCe—cc—Ref.html (Mar. 2001). |
Drozdowski, “Scheduling Multiprocessor Tasks—An Overview,” Instytut Informatyki Politechnika, pp. 1-31 (Jan. 31, 1996). |
Ebeling et al., “RaPiD Reconfigurable Pipelined Datapath,” Springer-Verlag, 6th International Workshop on Field-Programmable Logic and Applications pp. 126-135 (1996). |
Fawer et al., “A Multiprocessor Approach for Implementing a Time-Diversity Spread Specturm Receiver,” Proceeding sof the 1990 International Zurich Seminal on Digital Communications, pp. 173-180 (Mar. 5-8, 1990). |
Fisher, “Gone Flat,” Forbes pp. 76-79 (Oct. 2001). |
Fleischmann et al., “Prototyping Networked Embedded Systems,” Integrated Engineering, pp. 116-119 (Feb. 1999). |
Forbes “Best of the Web—Computer Networking/Consumer Durables,” The Forbes Magnetic 40 p. 80 (May 2001). |
Gibson, “Fresh Technologies Will Create Myriad Functions,” FT Information Technology Review; World Wide Web at http://technews.acm.org/articles/2000-2/0301w.html?searchterm=%22fresh+technologies%22 (Mar. 1, 2000). |
Gluth, “Integrierte Signalprozessoren,” Elektronik 35(18):112-118 Franzis Verlag GMBH, Munich, Germany (Sep. 5, 1986). |
Gokhale & Schlesinger, “A Data Parallel C and Its Platforms,” Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on the Frontiers of Massively Parallel Computation pp. 194-202 (Frontiers '95) (Feb. 1995). |
Grimm et al., “A System Architecture for Pervasive Computing,” Washington University, pp. 1-6 (Sep. 2000). |
Halbwachs et al., “The Synchronous Data Flow Programming Language Lustre,” Proceedings of the IEEE 79(9):1305-1319 (Sep. 1991). |
Hammes et al., “Cameron: High Level Language Compilation for Reconfigurable Systems,” Proc. of the Intl. Conf. on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques, pp. 236-244 (Oct. 1999). |
Hartenstein, “Coarse Grain Reconfigurable Architectures,” Design Automation Conference, 2001. Proceedings of the ASP-Dac 2001, Asian and South Pacific Jan. 30-Feb. 2, 2001, Piscataway, NJ, US, IEEE, pp. 564-569. |
Heinz, “An Efficiently Compliable Extension of {M}odula-3 for Problem-Oriented Explicitly Parallel Programming,” Proceedings of the Joint Symposium on Parallel Processing (May 1993). |
Hinden et al., “The DARPA Internet: Interconnecting Heterogeneous Computer Networks with Gateways,” IEEE Computer Magazine pp. 38-48 (1983). |
Horton, “Beginning Java 2: JDK 1.3 Edition,” Wrox Press, Chapter 8, pp. 313-316 (Feb. 2001). |
Huff et al., “Lifetime-Sensitive Modulo Scheduling,” 6th Conference on Programming Language, Design and Implementation, pp. 258-267, ACM (1993). |
IBM, “Multisequencing a Single Instruction Stream Scheduling with Space-time Trade-offs,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin 36(2):105-108 (Feb. 1, 1993). |
IEEE, “IEEE Standard Verilog Hardware Description Language,” downloaded from http://inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/˜cs150/fa06/Labs/verilog-ieee.pdf on Dec. 7, 2006 (Sep. 2001). |
Internet Wire, Sunbeam Joins Microsoft in University Plug and Play Forum to Establish A “Universal” Smart Appliance Technology Standard (Mar. 23, 2000). |
Ishii et al., “Parallel Variable Length Decoding with Inverse Quantization for Software MPEG-2 Decoders,” Workshop on Signal Processing Systems, Design and Implementation, IEEE pp. 500-509 (Nov. 3-5, 1997). |
Isoworth, “Isoworth Beverage Dispensing Technology Worldwide Company,” Brochure (May 22, 2000). |
Jain et al., “An Alternative Approach Towards the Design of Control Units,” Microelectronics and Reliability 24(6):1009-1012 (1984). |
Jain, “Parallel Processing with the TMS320C40 Parallel Digital Signal Processor,” Sonitech International Inc., pp. 13-46. Retrieved from: http.//www-s.ti.com/sc/psheets/spra031/spra031.pdf retrieved on Apr. 14, 2004 (Feb. 1994). |
Janssen et al., “Partitioned Register File for TTAs,” Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pp. 303-312 (Nov. 1995). |
Jong-Pyng et al., “Real-Time Virtual Channel Flow Control,” Proceedings of the Annual International Phoenix Conference on Computers and Communications, Conf. 13, pp. 97-103 (Apr. 12, 1994). |
Jung et al., “Efficient Hardware Controller Synthesis for Synchronous Dataflow Graph in System Level Design,” Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on System Synthesis pp. 79-84 (ISSS'00) (Sep. 2000). |
Kaufmann et al., “Digital Spread-Spectrum Multipath-Diversity Receiver for Indoor Communication,” from Pioneers to the 21st Century; Denver, Proceedings of the Vehicular Technology Socity [sic] Conference, NY, IEEE, US 2(Conf. 42):1038-1041 (May 10-13, 1992). |
Kneip et al., “An Algorithm Adapted Autonomous Controlling Concept for a Parallel Single-Chip Digital Signal Processor,” Journal of VLSI Signal Processing Systems for Signal, Image, an dVideo Technology 16(1):31-40 (May 1, 1997). |
Lee & Messerschmitt, “Pipeline Interleaved Programmable DSP's: Synchronous Data Flow Programming,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing ASSP-35(9):1334-1345 (Sep. 1987). |
Lee & Messerschmitt, “Synchronous Data Flow,” Proceedings of the IEEE 75(9):1235-1245 (Sep. 1987). |
Lee & Parks, “Dataflow Process Networks,” Proceedings of the IEEE 83(5):773-799 (May 1995). |
Liu et al., “Scheduling Algorithms for Multiprogramming in a Hard-Real-Time Environment,” Journal of the Association for Computing 20(1):46-61 (1973). |
Llosa et al., “Lifetime-Sensitive Modulo Scheduling in a Production Environment,” IEEE Trans. on Comps. 50(3):234-249 (Mar. 2001). |
Lu et al., “The Morphosys Dynamically Reconfigurable System-On-Chip,” Proceedings of the First NASA/DOD Workshop on Evolvable Hardware, pp. 152-160 (Jul. 19, 1999). |
Mangione-Smith et al., “Seeking Solutions in Configurable Computing,” Computer 30(12):38-43 (Dec. 1997). |
Manion, “Network CPU Adds Spice,” Electronic Engineering Times, Issue 1126 (Aug. 14, 2000). |
Mascia & Ishii., “Neural Net Implementation on Single-Chip Digital Signal Processor,” IEEE (1989). |
McGraw, “Parallel Functional Programming in Sisal: Fictions, Facts, and Future,” Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory pp. 1-40 (Jul. 1993). |
Najjar et al., “High-Level Language Abstraction for Reconfigurable Computing,” Computer 36(8):63-69 (Aug. 2003). |
Nichols et al., “Data Management and Control-Flow Constructs in a SIMD/SPMD Parallel Language/Compiler,” Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on the Frontiers of Massively Parallel Computation pp. 397-406 (Oct. 1990). |
OpenMP Architecture Review Board, “OpenMP C and C++ Application Program Interface,” pp. 7-16 (Oct. 1998). |
Oracle Corporation, “Oracle8i JDBC Developer's Guide and Reference,” Release 3, 8.1.7, pp. 10-8-10-10 (Jul. 2000). |
Pauer et al., “Algorithm Analysis and Mapping Environment for Adaptive Computing Systems: Further Results,” Proc. IEEE Symposium on FPGA's for Custom Computing Machines (FCCM), Napa CA (1999). |
Pauer et al., “Algorithm Analysis and Mapping Environment for Adaptive Computing Systems,” Presentation slides, Third Bi-annual Ptolemy Miniconference (1999). |
Ramamritham et al., “On Scheduling Algorithms for Real-Time Multiprocessor Systems,” Algorithms and Applications, Proceedings of the International conference on Parallel Processing 3:143-152 (Aug. 8, 1989). |
Schneider, “A Parallel/Serial Trade-Off Methodology for Look-Up Table Based Decoders,” Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference 34:498-503 (Jun. 9-13, 1997). |
Sidhu et al., “A Self-Reconfigurable Gate Array Architecture,” 10 International Workshop on Field Programmable Logic and Applications http://coblitz.codeen.org:3125/citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/papers/cs/17524/http:zS zzSzmaarcii.usc.eduzSzPublicationsZSzsidhu—fp100.pdf/sidhu00selfreconfigurable.pdf retrieved on Jun. 21, 2006 (Sep. 1, 2001). |
Smith, “Intro to ASICs: ASIC Cell Libraries,” at http://iroi.seu.edu.cn/books/asics/Book2/CH01/CH01.5.htm, printed on Feb. 4, 2005 (Jun. 1997). |
Souza, “ Computing's New Face—Reconfigurable Devices Could Rattle Supply Chain,” Electronic Buyers' News Issue 1205, p. P.1 (Apr. 3, 2000). |
Souza, “Quicksilver Buys White Eagle,” Electronic Buyers News, Issue 1220 (Jul. 17, 2000). |
Sriram et al., “MPEG-2 Video Decoding on the TMS320C6X DSP Architecture,” Conference Record of the 32nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, IEEE pp. 1735-1739 (Nov. 1-4, 1998). |
Steiner, “Coke Chief's Latest Daft Idea—A Cola Tap in Every House,” Sunday Times (Mar. 2001). |
Sun Microsystems, “FORTRAN 3.0.1 User's Guide, Revision A,” pp. 57-68 (Aug. 1994). |
Svensson, “Co's Join on Home Web Wiring Network,” Associated Press Online printed on Apr. 30, 2008 (Jun. 2000). |
Tang et al., “Thread Partitioning and Scheduling Based on Cost Model,” Proceedings of the Ninth Annual ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures, pp. 272-281 Retrieved from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/258492.2585 retrieved on Aug. 25, 2004 (1997). |
Vaya, “VITURBO: A Reconfigurable Architecture for Ubiquitous Wireless Networks,” A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science; RICE University (Aug. 2002). |
Wang et al., “Cell Search in W-CDMA,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 18(8):1470-1482 (Aug. 2000). |
Wardell, “Help for Hurried Cooks?,” Popular Science, p. 32 (May 2000). |
Whiting & Pascoe, “A History of Data-Flow Languages,” IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 16(4):38-59 (1994). |
Williamson & Lee, “Synthesis of Parallel Hardware Implementations from Synchronous Dataflow Graph Specifications,” Conference Record of the Thirtieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers 1340-1343 (Nov. 1996). |
Wirthlin et al., “A Dynamic Instruction Set Computer,” Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on FPGA's for Custom Computing Machines, pp. 99-107 (Apr. 21, 1995). |
www.appliancemagazine.com, World Wide Web at http://web.archive.org/web/20000511085402/http://www.appliancemagazine.com/ printed on Apr. 30, 2008. |
www.bestrom.com, BreakMateTM from www.bestrom.com printed on Apr. 29, 2008. |
www.beverageexpress.com, Beverage Express from www.beverageexpress.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008. |
www.bevstar.com, Isoworth Beverage Dispensing Technology Worldwide from www.bevstar.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008. |
www.bonator.com, from The World Wide Web at http://web.archive.org/web/20000510102440/http.//www.bonator.com/ printed on Apr. 30, 2008. |
www.ecommerce.dewpointinc.com, Swiss Mountain Coffees from www.ecommerce.dewpointinc.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008. |
www.gateway.com, World Wide Web, http://web.archive.org/web/20000229192734/www.gateway.com/productpages/9300splash/index.shtml Available on Mar. 3, 2000, 1 page (Mar. 3, 2000). |
www.icl.com, from the World Wide Web at http.//www.icl.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008. |
www.margherita2000.com; from Margherita2000.com printed Apr. 30, 2008 (Jan. 26, 2001). |
www.sodaclubenterprises.com, Soda-Club Enterprises from www.sodaclubenterprises.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008. |
www.symbol.com, Symbol from www.symbol.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008. |
www.wunderbar.com, Wunder-Bar Dispensing Systems from www.wunderbar.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008. |
Xilinx, “Virtex-II Pro Platform FPGAs: Functional Description DS083-2 (v2.5),” Product Specification, pp. 13-46 (Jan. 20, 2003). |
Young, “Architecture Powers up IPSec, SSL,” EETimes, Los Gatos, CA, pp. 1-4 http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20011102S0065 (Nov. 2, 2001). |
Yuan et al., “A Decomposition Approach to Non-Preemptive Real-Time Scheduling,” Real Time Systems 6(1):7-35 (1994). |
Zaino et al., “Algorithm Analysis and Mapping Environment for Adaptive Computing Systems,” Final Technical Report, DARPA Contract F33615-97-C-1174 (Sep. 2001). |
Zhang et al., “A 1V Heterogeneous Reconfigurable Processor IC for Baseband Wireless Applications,” 2000 IEEE Solid. |
Adl-Tabatabai et al., “Code Reuse in an Optimizing Compiler,” OOPSLA, ACM pp. 51-68 (1996). |
Altera Apex 20K 1999. |
Andraka Consulting Group, “Distributed Arithmetic,” Obtained from: http.//www.fpga-guru.com/distribu.htm (1998-2000). |
Bickerstaff et al., “A Unified Turbo/Viterbi Channel Decoder for 3GPP Mobile Wireless in 0.18μ CMOS,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 37(11):1555-62 (2002). |
Clark et al., “Error Correction Coding for Digital Communications,” Plenum Press NY (1981). |
Hanna et al., “A Normalized Backpropagation Learning Algorithm for Multilayer Feed-Forward Neural Adaptive Filters,” Neural Networks for Signal Processing XI, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop pp. 63-72 (Sep. 2001). |
Hekstra, “An Alternative to Metric Resealing in Viterbi Decoders,” IEEE Transactions on Communications vol. 37 No. 11 (Nov. 1989). |
Hendrix, “Viterbi Decoding Techniques in the TMS320C54x Family,” Texas Instruments Application Note (Jun. 1996). |
Janweijer et al., “A Compact Robin Using the SHarc (CRUSH),” Obtained from: http://www.nikhef.n1/˜peterj/Crush/CRUSH-hw.pdf (Sep. 1998). |
Paaske et al., “High Speed Viterbi Decoder Architecture,” First ESA Workshop on Tracking, Telemetry and Command Systems, ESTEC (Jun. 1998). |
Rajagopalan et al., “A Flexible Multiplication Unit for an FPGA Logic Block,” Circuits and Systems 4:546-9 (2001). |
Xilinx Data Book 1998. |
Xilinx Virtex 1.1 1998. |
Xilinx Virtex 2.2 2000. |
Yeo et al., “Implementation of High Throughput Soft Output Viterbi Decoders,” Proc. IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems pp. 146-151 San Diego CA (Oct. 2002). |
Bogan et al., Power Reduction Techniques for a Viterbi Decoder Implementation, ESPLD Third Int'l Workshop, Jul. 25-28, 2000, pp. 28-48. |
Chan et al., Low-power bit-serial viterbi decoder for 3rd generation W-CDMA systems, Proc. of the IEEE, 1999, pp. 589-592. |
Garrett et al., Low power architecture of the soft-output Viterbi decoder algorithm, Proc. of the 1998 Int'l Symposium on low power electronics and design, 1998, pp. 262-267. |
Kim et al., Implementation of convolutional encoder and Viterbi decoder for wideband CDMA PCT baseband processing unit using multiple TMS320C40s, Circuits and Systems, Proc. of IEEE Int'l Symposium, Jun. 9-12, 1997, pp. 2613-2616, vol. 4. |
Matche et al., Trellis coding for diagonally layered space-time systems, Communications, 2002, ICC 2002, IEEE Int'l Conference, 2002, pp. 1388-1992, vol. 3. |
Wang et al., Cell Search in W-CDMA, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, U.S., vol. 18, No. 8, Aug. 2008, pp. 1470-1482, XP002224578 ISSN: 0733-8716, p. 1470. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 10/015,531, dated Mar. 20, 2006. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 10/295,692, dated Dec. 14, 2006. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/797,583, dated May 4, 2009. |
Office Action (Final) from U.S. Appl. No. 11/797,583, dated Oct. 10, 2008. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/015,531, dated Jul. 21, 2005. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/295,962, dated Apr. 4, 2006. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/797,583, dated Sep. 28, 2007. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090268789 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11797583 | May 2007 | US |
Child | 12499756 | US | |
Parent | 10295692 | Nov 2002 | US |
Child | 11797583 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10015531 | Dec 2001 | US |
Child | 10295692 | US |