Low I/O bandwidth method and system for implementing detection and identification of scrambling codes

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8442096
  • Patent Number
    8,442,096
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, July 8, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 14, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
A system for detecting and identifying the identity of a base station or cell which transmits a scrambling code is provided. According to one aspect of the system, the system is used to perform scrambling code detection of eight (8) primary cells (each scrambling code's X-component being spaced sixteen (16) chips apart) in a group. According to another aspect of the system, a single scrambling code generator is used to generate a master scrambling code. The master scrambling code is then used to create individual scrambling codes which are used in correlation with received signals to detect in parallel which one of the eight (8) possible primary cells in the group transmitted the received signals. According to yet another aspect of the system, each of the correlators maintains a corresponding X-component segment of the master scrambling code. For every sixteen (16) chips, a new X-component segment of the master scrambling code is introduced into one of the correlators, a X-component segment of the master scrambling code is dropped from another correlator, and X-component segments of the master scrambling code are sequentially shifted or propagated through the remaining correlators; and concurrent correlations are performed by the correlators using their respective corresponding X-component segments of the master scrambling code and newly received signals.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to scrambling codes. More specifically, the present invention relates to a method and system for detecting scrambling codes within a W-CDMA communication system.


Code acquisition is a fundamental algorithm required in any direct sequence spread spectrum (DSSS) receiver. Prior to de-spreading, demodulating and decoding frames, such a receiver needs to acquire knowledge of timing information relating to the underlying spreading waveform being used to spread the data-bearing signal. According to the wide-band code division multiple access (W-CDMA) communication system of the 3GPP standards body, upon turning on a mobile terminal or device, a 3-step initial cell search procedure needs to be performed to acquire the primary scrambling code which is used to spread the data bearing channels. Examples of such channels are the primary common pilot channel (P-CPICH) and the dedicated physical channel (DPCH).


The first step of the 3-step initial cell search procedure relates to slot timing. In a W-CDMA communication system, each base station transmits its own scrambling code in frames over the air to a mobile terminal. Each frame is made up of fifteen (15) slots. Before the start of a frame can be located, the start of a slot needs to be identified first. Once the start of a slot is identified, then it can be assured that one of the next fifteen (15) slots represents the start of a frame. Upon conclusion of the first step, the start of a slot is identified.


The second step of the 3-step initial cell search procedure relates to frame timing. As mentioned above, at the end of the first step, the start of a slot is identified. Once that is achieved, the start of a frame can then be identified. Within a W-CDMA communication system, there are five hundred and twelve (512) base stations within the network. The base stations are identified in the network by a network matrix. The network matrix has sixty-four groups (64) and each group has eight (8) cells. A particular base station is identified by its group and its cell position within the group. During this second step, the start of a frame is identified and the mobile terminal can then synchronize to the identified frame and obtain information relating to group identification. Upon conclusion of the second step, the group which contains the base station that sent out the frame (or scrambling code) is identified, i.e., one out of sixty-four (64) group is identified.


Upon completing the first two steps of the initial cell search procedure, the receiver has knowledge of the slot and frame timing of the received scrambling code, such as a P-CPICH signal. The receiver also has knowledge of the group identification of the base station or cell being acquired. The group identification information contains information on all eight (8) primary cells within the group. Since there are eight (8) cells in a group, using the group identification information, the receiver needs only to identify one (1) out of eight (8) possible primary cells from the group.


To achieve this goal, the receiver may use one of two conventional approaches. Under the first approach, the receiver may perform a correlation of the received signals with a parallel bank of eight (8) scrambling code generators (typical correlation length N ranges from 64 to 256 chips based on frequency offset in the received signals). All the eight (8) correlations are performed within N chips, at the expense of using eight (8) parallel scrambling code generators.


Under the second approach, the receiver may sequentially correlate the received signals with eight (8) possible scrambling codes for N chips each. Using a single scrambling code generator, one may attain all eight (8) correlation results after slightly greater than 8*N chips (this number of chips is needed to allow for reassigning the scrambling code generator to another phase offset, after each correlation is performed).


Implementations may not be limited to the above two conventional approaches. The above two approaches were explained for the case of real time processing of the CDMA signal, i.e. no buffering of received data was assumed for these two cases.


As mentioned above, the eight (8) scrambling codes may be generated in parallel, using eight (8) separate scrambling code generators each operating independently, or the eight (8) scrambling codes maybe generated using a single scrambling code generator using eight (8) sets of masks (a set=4 18-bit masks). However, both of these approaches require additional power consumption/silicon area. Under the first approach, additional scrambling code generators are needed; and under the second approach, additional memory storage is needed to store the received signals and it takes additional time to generate and process the necessary scrambling codes in a sequential manner.


Hence, it would be desirable to provide a method and system which is capable of generating scrambling codes for correlation to identify a received scrambling code in a more efficient manner.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An exemplary method of the present invention is used to perform scrambling code detection of eight (8) primary cells (each scrambling code's X-component being spaced sixteen (16) chips apart) in a group. According to the exemplary method, a single scrambling code generator is used to generate a master scrambling code. The master scrambling code is then used to create individual scrambling codes which are used in correlation with received signals to detect in parallel which one of the eight (8) possible primary cells in the group transmitted the received signals. Each individual scrambling code has an X-component and a Y-component. The individual scrambling codes are created based on the fact that the X-component of each cell station's scrambling code's phase reference is spaced sixteen (16) chips apart.


The use of this exemplary method reduces the complexity of scrambling code or PN generator(s) in the parallel search implementation. More specifically, the use of this exemplary method avoids the need to utilize parallel logic to generate eight (8) scrambling codes. Since the X-component of each primary scrambling code within a group is sixteen (16) chips apart, a pair of buffers (one for the X-component and one for the Y-component) is used to store a sequential stream of X- and Y-components of the master scrambling code (typically the first primary code with a group) output respectively from a single scrambling code generator. Since the Y-component is common to all primary cells in the group, the Y-component is correlated with different portions of the X-component (each portion being offset by a multiple of sixteen (16) locations from the X-component buffer) to generate all eight (8) individual scrambling codes in the group. That is, using different 16-chip offsets in the X-component buffers (complex samples) and a common Y-component buffer (complex samples), all eight (8) different complex individual scrambling codes can be generated. The received data is then correlated in parallel with each of the eight (8) individual scrambling codes generated from the master scrambling code. Eight dimensions are mapped to a single dimension at the expense of a slight increase in storage size.


This exemplary method can be used as part of an overall 3-step initial cell search procedure to acquire the downlink of a 3GPP WCDMA cell, which more specifically corresponds to part of the stage 3 portion of the cell search procedure.


According to an exemplary implementation of the exemplary method of the present invention, the exemplary implementation includes a single scrambling code generator and eight (8) correlators arranged in sequential order. Each of the correlators maintains a corresponding segment of the master scrambling code's X-component and a common segment of the Y-component. For every sixteen (16) chips, a new segment of the master scrambling code's X-component is introduced into one of the correlators by the scrambling code generator, a segment of the master scrambling code's X-component is dropped from another correlator, and segments of the master scrambling code's X-component are sequentially shifted or propagated through the remaining correlators; and concurrent correlations are performed by the correlators using their respective corresponding segments of the master scrambling code and newly received signals. The foregoing process is repeated until a desired correlation length is achieved.


Reference to the remaining portions of the specification, including the drawings and claims, will realize other features and advantages of the present invention. Further features and advantages of the present invention, as well as the structure and operation of various embodiments of the present invention, are described in detail below with respect to accompanying drawings, like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 a is a simplified diagram illustrating the timing of the X-components of the scrambling codes of the eight (8) cells within a group;



FIG. 1
b is a simplified diagram illustrating the timing of the Y-components of the scrambling codes of the eight (8) cells within a group;



FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating an exemplary method of the present invention;



FIG. 3 is a simplified diagram illustrating parallel correlations of eight (8) cells in a group using a single scrambling code generator according to the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a simplified diagram illustrating one exemplary implementation of the exemplary method according to the present invention;



FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating one exemplary implementation of the exemplary method in accordance with the present invention;



FIGS. 6
a and 6b are simplified diagrams illustrating a second exemplary implementation of the exemplary method in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 7
a is a diagram illustrating correlation results generated by the exemplary method shown in FIG. 3 in accordance with the present invention; and



FIG. 7
b is a diagram illustrating correlation results generated after one iteration by the exemplary implementation shown in FIG. 6 in accordance with the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention in the form of one or more exemplary embodiments will now be discussed. The present invention can be applied to the third step of the initial cell search procedure when a mobile terminal is initially powered on to identify the base station or cell which transmitted the received signals containing a scrambling code. FIG. la is a simplified diagram illustrating the timing of the X-components of the scrambling codes of the eight (8) cells within a group. Referring to FIG. 1a, the scrambling code of each cell is transmitted on a periodic basis and the period of the scrambling code of each cell is thirty-eight thousand and four hundred (38,400) chips, i.e., the scrambling code of each cell is repeated after 38,400 chips. For example, for cell “0”, X0 is generated internally within a scrambling code generator at t0 and at t 38,400. Furthermore, the X-components of the scrambling codes of any two adjacent cells are offset by sixteen (16) chips. For example, cells “0” and “1” transmit X0 and X16 respectively t0. The scrambling codes of all the cells within the group are transmitted at the same frame boundary. By having a 16-chip offset between two adjacent cells, the X-components of the scrambling codes between two adjacent groups of cells are offset by one hundred and twenty-eight (128) (16*8=128). It should be noted that the Y-components of all the scrambling codes for a group of cells are the same, i.e., there is no offset between the Y-components of adjacent scrambling codes. FIG. 1b is a simplified diagram illustrating the timing of the Y-components of the scrambling codes of the eight (8) cells within a group.


According to one exemplary method of the present invention, a scrambling code represented by the received signals is identified by using a single scrambling code generator to attain N chip correlation of the received signals with eight (8) primary scrambling codes in a group within N+16*7=N+112 chips.



FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating an exemplary method of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 2, at 20, the correlation length N is first determined. The correlation length N is the amount of time during which correlation between the received signals and the generated scrambling codes is summed up. The correlation length N is selected such that reasonable correlation results can be obtained. Typical values of the con-elation length N range from sixty-four (64) to two hundred and fifty-six (256), depending on the relative carrier frequency offset between the transmitted and received signals. A person of ordinary skill in the art will know how to select the proper correlation length. Next, at 22, using the selected correlation length, the chip offset (CO) between two adjacent scrambling codes, and the number of cells (C) within a group, a master scrambling code is generated. The master scrambling code has a X-component and a Y-component. The X-component and the Y-component are respectively stored in a X-component buffer and a Y-component buffer for subsequent use in generating possible scrambling codes from all the cells in an identified group. The master scrambling code has a period, e.g., 38,400 chips, which is sufficient to allow correlations to be performed reliably. N+CO*(C−1) corresponds to the amount of the code's X-component that needs to be generated to perform a correlation of length N with C cells spaced CO chips apart. Also, at the same time, N complex samples of the code's Y-component need to be generated. It should be noted that the product term CO*C represents the chip offset between the X-components of the respective scrambling codes of the first cells of two adjacent groups of base stations or cells. As mentioned above, during the first two steps of the initial cell search procedure, the start of the frame containing the scrambling code is identified and group identification information relating to the group which includes the cell that transmitted the received signals is available. With this information, the group which includes the cell that transmitted the received signals is identified. Moreover, using this information, the proper master scrambling code which covers all the possible scrambling codes from all the cells within the identified group can be generated. At 24, portions of the master scrambling code's X-component buffer are used, along with the common Y-component buffer, to create individual scrambling codes which correspond to the cells within the identified group. These individual scrambling codes are then correlated with the received signals in a parallel manner to determine which of the cells within the identified group transmitted the received signals.


The following is an example illustrating the exemplary method of the present invention. The example is based on the following assumptions: the correlation length N is two hundred and fifty-six (256); the chip offset CO is sixteen (16); and the number of cells C within the identified group is eight (8). The period of the master scrambling code is thirty-eight thousand and four hundred (38,400) chips.


Next, three hundred and sixty-eight (368) chips (X0−>X367) of the master scrambling code's X-component, as well as two hundred and fifty-six (256) chips (Y0−>Y255) of the master scrambling code's Y-component, are generated from a single scrambling code generator tuned to the first primary cell of the underlying identified group. The length of three hundred and sixty-eight (368) chips is determined based on the formula N+CO*(C−1) which, in this case, equals to 256+16*(8−1)=256+16*7=256+112=368. The length of chips for the Y-component is determined by the correlation length N, which in this case is two hundred and fifty-six (256). It should be noted that it is not necessary to generate all three hundred and sixty-eight (368) chips and all two hundred and fifty-six (256) Y-component chips prior to correlation. The generation of three hundred and sixty-eight (368) chips is specified to emphasize the total number of chips required out of the scrambling code generator's X-component to implement eight (8) parallel correlations of two hundred and fifty-six (256) chips each.



FIG. 3 is a simplified diagram illustrating parallel correlations of eight (8) cells in a group using a single scrambling code generator. As shown in FIG. 3, each of the eight (8) correlators correlates the received signals or real-time data (D0−>D255) with two hundred and fifty-six (256) X-component chips and two hundred and fifty-six (256) Y-component chips. The respective X-component chips for the correlators are each generated by operating on different portions of the X-component buffer. As mentioned above, the X-component buffer contains the X-component of the master scrambling code. Furthermore, the respective X-component chips of two adjacent correlators are started at an offset of sixteen (16) chips. The Y-component chips are the same for all correlators. It should be noted that the contents of the X-component buffer and the Y-component buffer are complex. For example, the first correlator correlates the received signals (D0−>D255) with the X-component chips (X0−>X255) and with the Y-component chips (Y0−>Y255); the second correlator correlates the received signals (D0−>D255) with the X-component chips (X16−>X271) and again with the Y-component chips (Y0−>Y255); and so on, and the final correlator correlates the received signals (D0−>D255) with the X-component chips (X112−>X367) and also with the Y-component chips (Y0−>Y255). The correlation results are then obtained from each of the correlators. By evaluating the correlation results, the scrambling code represented by the received signals can be identified and, hence, the identity of the base station or cell which transmitted the received signals can also be determined.



FIG. 4 is a simplified diagram illustrating an exemplary implementation of the exemplary method described above in accordance with the present invention. It is to be noted that the received signals are processed simultaneously in real-time by eight (8) parallel correlators. The scrambling code generator generates and X-component buffer that is three hundred and sixty-eight (368) chips long, i.e., N+112 chips, and a Y-component buffer that is two hundred and fifty-six (256) chips long. This is in contrast to 8*N*2 (*8N for the X-component and *8N for the Y-component) complex chips that must be generated for the alternative approach in the parallel search implementation. Hence, there is a factor of 8N*2/(2N+128) savings on the scrambling code generation complexity using the present invention, which equals to 6.4 for N=256 (an 85% reduction in complexity).


The exemplary method of the present invention as described may be implemented in software, hardware or a combination of both. For example, the exemplary method of the present invention may be implemented as control logic using software embedded in a mobile terminal. When implemented using software, the exemplary method may be implemented in a modular or integrated manner within the mobile terminal. Based on disclosure provided herein, a person of ordinary skill in the art will know of other ways and/or methods to implement the present invention.


Referring to FIG. 3, it can be seen that in accordance with the exemplary method, for a correlation length of two hundred and fifty-six (256), a 16-chip offset between the X-components of the scrambling codes and eight (8) cells within a group, a master scrambling code with a period of thirty-eight thousand and four hundred (38,400) chips is generated. This would require a global storage access of 8N*2 locations (since data is complex) for every N chips of correlation. If hardware resources are not limited, then the master scrambling code and the received signals can be stored in memory registers and each correlator can then read out the corresponding 256-chip scrambling code that it needs to perform the correlation.



FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating an exemplary implementation of the exemplary method described above in accordance with the present invention. As will be illustrated below, the exemplary implementation reduces the storage and access requirements needed to implement the exemplary method in accordance with the present invention. Referring to FIG. 5, at 50, a portion of the master scrambling code is generated to populate the correlators. The generation of the master scrambling code by a single scrambling code generator is described above. As previously described, the master scrambling code has a X-component and a Y-component. The number of correlators and the length of each correlator respectively depend on the number of cells within a group and the chip offset between the X-components of the respective scrambling codes of two adjacent cells within the group. The correlators collectively contain the entire generated portion of the master scrambling code, i.e., each correlator is populated with segments of the X- and Y-components of the generated portion of the master scrambling code. The length of the portion of the master scrambling code's X-component to be generated depends on the chip offset between the X-components of the respective scrambling codes of two adjacent groups of cells. As mentioned above, this chip offset, in turn, depends on the number of cells within a group and the chip offset between the X-components of the respective scrambling codes of two adjacent cells within the group. For instance, for a W-CDMA communication system, there are eight (8) cells in a group and the chip offset between the X-components of the scrambling codes of two adjacent cells within the group is sixteen (16). Hence, the length of the portion of the X-component of the master scrambling code to be initially generated is one hundred and twenty-eight (128=16*8) chips.


At 52, a set of received signals are captured. The duration of the capture period equals to the chip offset between the X-components of the respective scrambling codes of two adjacent cells within a group. For a W-CDMA communication system, the duration of the capture period is thus sixteen (16) chips.


At 54, the set of received signals arc correlated with the generated portion of the master scrambling code by the correlators and the correlation results are stored. After the correlations are performed, at 56, each correlator shifts or propagates its segment of the X-component of the generated portion of the master scrambling code to its neighboring correlator and shares a common Y-component segment. The exception being that, at 58, the first correlator discards its current segment of the X-component and the last correlator receives a newly generated segment of the X-component from the single scrambling code generator. In addition, at 58, segments of the Y-component from all the correlators are discarded and a newly generated segment of the Y-component is loaded into all the correlators in parallel. As a result, at any given time, all the correlators share the same segment of the Y-component. Then, the process returns to 52 where the next set of received signals are captured and correlated. The foregoing process is repeated until the entire master scrambling code is generated and correlated. From an alternative perspective, this can be viewed as segments of the X-component of the master scrambling code being correlated in a pipelined fashion on a first-in-first-out basis.



FIGS. 6
a and 6b are simplified block diagrams illustrating an exemplary physical implementation of the exemplary method described above. Referring to FIGS. 6a and 6b, there is shown an exemplary system 60 having a single scrambling code generator 62 and eight (8) correlators 64-78. This exemplary system 60 operates based on the following assumptions: there are eight (8) cells in a group; the chip offset between the X-components of the respective scrambling codes of two adjacent cells in a group is sixteen (16) chips; and the correlation length N is selected to be two hundred and fifty-six (256).


The exemplary system 60 operates as follows. Initially, before any correlation is performed, the correlators COR0-COR7 64-78 are collectively populated with a portion of the master scrambling code's X- and Y-components by the single scrambling code generator 62. The portion of the X-component of the master scrambling code that is initially generated is one hundred and twenty-eight (128=16*8) chips in length (X0−>X127) and the portion of the Y-component that is initially generated is sixteen (16) chips in length. The portion of the X-component of the master scrambling code is segmented and populated into the correlators COR0-COR7 64-78 and the portion of the Y-component is loaded in parallel into all the correlators COR0-COR7 64-78. Each correlator has a length of sixteen (16). For example, after initial population, correlator COR0 78 includes scrambling code segment X0-X15; correlator COR1 76 includes segment X16-X31; and correlator COR7 64 includes segment X112-X127; and so on. In addition, all the correlators COR0-COR7 64-78 also include scrambling code segment Y0-Y15. It should be noted that the initial generation of all one hundred and twenty-eight (128) chips of the portion of the X-component of the master scrambling code and the sixteen (16) chips of the portion of the Y-component of the master scrambling code before starting any of the correlations is not required. One of the correlators 64-78 can be started every sixteen (16) chips in a pipelined fashion.


Next, a set of complex data signals or samples which is sixteen (16) chips in length, D0-D15, are received and fed to each of the correlators 64-78. Then, each correlator partially correlates the same set of received complex data samples with the complex conjugate of its corresponding scrambling code segment. The corresponding scrambling segment includes a portion of the X-component and a portion of the Y-component. It is to be noted that the respective X-components of the scrambling code segments of any two adjacent correlators have a chip offset of sixteen (16) chips and that the same portion of the Y-component is shared by all the correlators 64-78. For example, the first correlator COR0 78 correlates the received data samples, D0-D15, with the complex conjugate of its corresponding scrambling code segment, (X0−>X15)+j(Y0−>Y15); the second correlator COR1 76 correlates the received data samples, D0-D15, with the complex conjugate of its corresponding scrambling code segment, (X16−>X31)+j(Y0−>Y15); and so on, and the final correlator COR7 64 correlates the received data samples, D0-D15, with the complex conjugate of its corresponding scrambling code segment, (X112−>X127)+j(Y0−>Y0−Y15). The correlations of the eight (8) correlators 64-78 are performed concurrently in a parallel manner and the correlation results are stored for subsequent evaluation.


After this first iteration of correlations, each correlator passes its current corresponding scrambling code segment (X-component) to a neighboring correlator. It should be noted that each correlator has two neighboring correlators. In effect, with two exceptions which will be described below, this means each correlator also receives a new corresponding scramble code segment (X-component) from another neighboring correlator. Graphically, this is shown as follows: COR1−>COR0, COR2−>COR1, COR3−>COR2, COR4−>COR3, COR5−>COR4, COR6−>COR5. In essence, the scrambling code segments (X-components) are shifted or propagated along the correlators 64-78. The two exceptions are the first correlator COR0 78 and the last correlator COR7 64. For the first correlator COR0 78, its current corresponding scramble code segment (X-component) is discarded; and for the last correlator COR7 64, a new scrambling code segment (X-component) generated by the single scrambling code generator 62 is fed to the last correlator COR7 64. The newly generated scrambling code segment (X-component) is the next segment of the master scrambling code that follows the scrambling code segment (X-component) that was in the last correlator COR7 64 before that scrambling code segment (X-component) was transferred to correlator COR6 66. For example, after the first iteration, the newly generated scrambling code segment (X-component) to be fed into the last correlator COR7 64 is X128-X143. This is because scrambling code segment (X-component) X128-X143 follows scrambling code segment (X-component) X128-X127 within the master scrambling code. By shifting or transferring the scrambling code segments as described above, the entire master scrambling code is propagated along all the correlators 64-78 and is eventually correlated with the received data samples as described in FIG. 3. Furthermore, along with the generation of the new scrambling code segment (X-component), a new scrambling code segment (Y-component) is also generated. In the present example, the new scrambling code segment (Y-component) is Y16-Y31 following the previous scrambling code (Y-component) Y0-Y15. As described above, the new scrambling code (Y-component) is loaded into all the correlators 64-78 in parallel.


The next set of complex data samples are received, D16-D31, and loaded into the correlators 64-78. Another iteration of concurrent correlations by the correlators 64-78 is then performed again. The foregoing process of shifting the scrambling code segments, receiving the next set of complex data samples and performing another iteration of correlations is repeated until the master scrambling code is correlated or, conversely, the collective length of all the received complex data samples reaches the correlation length.



FIG. 7
a illustrates the correlation results generated using the exemplary method shown in FIG. 3. FIG. 7b illustrates the correlation results after the first iteration of correlations by the exemplary system 60. Comparing FIGS. 7a and 7b, it can be seen that by using the exemplary system 60 shown in FIG. 6, sixteen (16) terms are generated by each of the eight (8) correlations after one iteration. Hence, in order to generate the complete results as shown in FIG. 7a based on a correlation length of two hundred and fifty-six (256), sixteen (16) total iterations are executed.


As can be seen above, scrambling code segments (X- and Y-components) which make up the master scrambling code are internally shared amongst correlators 64-78. For every predetermined period (that is defined by the chip offset between the respective scrambling codes of any two adjacent cells within a group), e.g., sixteen (16) chips, the corresponding scrambling code segment (X-component) of each correlator is refreshed or updated. This sharing of scrambling code segments reduces the access to the otherwise globally stored master scrambling code by a factor of eight (8) (for cases using the above assumptions), i.e., 2N scrambling code read accesses are required every N chips of correlations.


In addition, for every iteration of correlations, the scrambling code generator 62 transfers or generates only 2*2N/16 binary values to one of the correlators 64-78. As mentioned above, the rest of the correlators 66-78 internally share the scrambling code segments which are already present amongst the correlators 64-78.


To further reduce scrambling code memory access as well as each correlator's working size, the technique of packing and unpacking bits may be used. If the above binary values were packed into a word and then unpacked at the time of correlation, the scrambling code generator 62 then needs to transfer only 2*2N/(16*16) 16-bit words to the group of correlators 64-78. That is, the working size of each correlator may be reduced to 2*2N/(16*16) by packing sixteen (16) bits at a time. This also reduces scrambling code storage access to 2*2N/16.


Furthermore, it is understood that while the present invention as described above is applicable to a W-CDMA communication system, it should be clear to a person of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention can be applied to other types of communication systems.


Moreover, it should be noted that the present invention as described herein may be implemented in a number of ways. For example, the present invention may be implemented using the adaptive computing architecture as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/815,122, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,836,839, entitled “ADAPTIVE INTEGRATED CIRCUITRY WITH HETEROGENEOUS AND RECONFIGURABLE MATRICES OF DIVERSE AND ADAPTIVE COMPUTATIONAL UNITS HAVING FIXED, APPLICATION SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL ELEMENTS,” filed on Mar. 22, 2001, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety as if set forth in full herein for all purposes. For instance, using the adaptive computing architecture, the scrambling code generator 62 and the correlators 64-78 may be implemented on demand within a mobile terminal. Based on the disclosure provided herein, a person of ordinary skill in the art will know of other ways and/or methods to implement and apply the present invention.


It is further understood that the examples and embodiments described herein are for illustrative purposes only and that various modifications or changes in light thereof will be suggested to persons skilled in the art and are to be included within the spirit and purview of this application and scope of the appended claims. All publications, patents, and patent applications cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes in their entirety.

Claims
  • 1. A system for identifying a scrambling code in received signals comprising: a first plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, each of the computational elements performing an arithmetic operation;a switchable interconnection network coupled to the first plurality of heterogeneous computational elements to configure the first plurality of heterogeneous computational elements as a scrambling code generator generating a plurality of segments forming a plurality of sequential chips of a master scrambling code, the configuration performed by switching the interconnections between the first plurality of heterogeneous computational elements;a second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, each of the computational elements performing an arithmetic operation and each coupled to the interconnection network, the second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements configured as a plurality of correlators configured to correlate in parallel the received signals with corresponding segments, a first correlator of the plurality of correlators configured to receive a next corresponding segment generated by the scrambling code generator, each remaining correlator of the plurality of correlators configured to receive its next corresponding segment from another correlator of the plurality of correlators, the configuration performed by switching the interconnections between the second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the interconnection network reconfigures some of the second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements configured as the first correlator as one of the remaining correlators.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first plurality of computational elements is one of the second plurality of computational elements, the second plurality of computational elements being configured after the plurality of segments is generated by the configured scrambling code generator.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the first and second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements and the interconnection network are on an integrated circuit.
  • 5. The system of clam 1, wherein the system is incorporated on a mobile terminal.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein, following each correlation, the plurality of correlators are configured to receive a new set of received signals.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of correlators are configured to generate correlation results; wherein the correlation results generated by the plurality of correlators are evaluated to identify the scrambling code from the received signals to determine the identity of a base station which transmitted one of the signals which the received signals comprise.
  • 8. The system according to claim 7, wherein the base station is in a Wide-band Code Division Multiple Access (W-CDMA) communication network.
  • 9. The system of claim 7 wherein the base station is one of a plurality of base stations of a communication network.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the predetermined group chip offset is determined by the number of base stations in a base station group and a predetermined chip offset.
  • 11. The system of claim 1, wherein the number of the plurality of correlators depends on the number of base stations in a base station group.
  • 12. The system of claim 1, wherein each segment of the plurality of segments has a length of chips determined by a predetermined chip offset.
  • 13. A system for identifying a scrambling code in received signals comprising: a first plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, each of the computational elements performing an arithmetic operation;a switchable interconnection network coupled to the first plurality of heterogeneous computational elements to configure the first plurality of heterogeneous computational elements as a scrambling code generator generating a plurality of segments forming a plurality of sequential chips of a master scrambling code, the configuration performed by switching the interconnections between the first plurality of heterogeneous computational elements;a second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, each of the computational elements performing an arithmetic operation and each coupled to the interconnection network, the second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements configured as a plurality of correlators including a first correlator, a last correlator and a plurality of intermediate correlators coupled between the first correlator and the last correlator, the plurality of correlators configured to perform correlations in parallel, each correlator of the plurality of correlators being populated with a corresponding segment generated by the scrambling code generator and each correlator receives a set of received data samples and correlates the received data samples with corresponding segments in parallel; andwherein after each parallel correlation by the plurality of correlators, the plurality of intermediate correlators and the last correlator transfer their corresponding segments to another correlator, the first correlator is discarding the corresponding segment, and the last correlator receives a new segment generated by the scrambling code generator.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the interconnection network reconfigures some of the second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements configured as the first correlator as one of the remaining correlators.
  • 15. The system of claim 13, wherein at least one of the first plurality of computational elements is one of the second plurality of computational elements, the second plurality of computational elements being configured after the plurality of segments is generated by the configured scrambling code generator.
  • 16. The system of claim 13, wherein the first and second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements and the interconnection network are on an integrated circuit.
  • 17. The system of clam 13, wherein the system is incorporated on a mobile terminal.
  • 18. The system of claim 13, wherein, following each correlation, each of the plurality of correlators is configured to receive a new set of received data samples.
  • 19. The system of claim 13, wherein the number of the plurality of correlators depends on the number of base stations in a base station group in a communication network.
  • 20. The system of claim 19, wherein the communication network is a Wide-band Code Division Multiple Access (W-CDMA) communication network and the system is used in connection with acquisition of a downlink of a 3GPP standards body W-CDMA cell during stage 3 of a cell search procedure.
  • 21. The system of claim 13, wherein the last correlator is configured to receive a next segment which sequentially follows the previous corresponding segment utilized by the last correlator.
  • 22. A method for identifying a scrambling code in received signals comprising: selecting a correlation length;configuring a first plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, each of the computational elements performing an arithmetic operation, via a switchable interconnection network as a scrambling code generator to identify a plurality of segments forming a plurality of sequential chips of a master scrambling code using the selected correlation length;configuring a second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, each of the computational elements performing an arithmetic operation via the interconnection network, as a plurality of correlators;populating each of the plurality of correlators configured from the second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements with a corresponding segment;providing a set of received data samples to each of the plurality of correlators;correlating the set of received data samples with its corresponding segment of the corresponding correlator;transferring the corresponding segments of all but one of the plurality of correlators to their respective next correlators; andpopulating one of the plurality of correlators with a next sequential segment.
  • 23. The method of claim 22, wherein the interconnection network reconfigures some of the second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements configured as a first correlator of the plurality of correlators as one of the remaining correlators in the plurality of correlators.
  • 24. The method of claim 22, wherein at least one of the first plurality of computational elements is one of the second plurality of computational elements, the second plurality of computational elements being configured after the plurality of segments is generated by the configured scrambling code generator.
  • 25. The method of claim 22, wherein the first and second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements and the interconnection network are on an integrated circuit.
  • 26. The method of clam 22, wherein the first and second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements and the interconnection network are incorporated on a mobile terminal.
  • 27. The method of claim 22, further comprising: storing corresponding correlation results generated by the plurality of correlators; andevaluating the stored correlation results to identify the scrambling code from the signals received to identify a base station which transmitted one of the signals which the received signals comprise.
  • 28. The method of claim 27, wherein the base station is in a Wide-band Code Division Multiple Access (W-CDMA) communication network and the method is used in connection with acquisition of a downlink of a 3GPP standards body W-CDMA cell during stage 3 of a cell search procedure.
  • 29. A method for identifying a scrambling code in received signals comprising: identifying a plurality of segments forming a plurality of sequential chips of a master scrambling code;configuring a first plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, each of the computational elements performing an arithmetic operation, via a switchable interconnection network as a plurality of correlators;iteratively and successively correlating a number of segments of the plurality of segments with corresponding sets of received data samples via the correlators; andfor each correlation iteration: providing a new set of received data samples;correlating the new set of received data samples with the number of segments; andafter each correlation iteration is completed, refreshing the number of segments in a first-in-first-out basis by discarding one segment and providing another segment.
  • 30. The method of claim 29, wherein the interconnection network reconfigures some of the second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements configured as a first correlator of the plurality of correlators are reconfigured as one of the remaining correlators of the plurality of correlators.
  • 31. The method of claim 29, wherein the first plurality of heterogeneous computational elements and the interconnection network are on an integrated circuit.
  • 32. The method of clam 29, wherein the first and second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements and the interconnection network are incorporated on a mobile terminal.
  • 33. The method of claim 29, further comprising: storing correlation results for each correlation iteration; andevaluating the collectively stored correlation results to identify the scrambling code from the signals received to identify a base station in a communication network which transmitted one of the signals which the received signals comprise.
  • 34. The method of claim 33, wherein the communication network is a Wide-band Code Division Multiple Access (W-CDMA) communication network and the method is used in connection with acquisition of a downlink of a 3GPP standards body W-CDMA cell during stage 3 of a cell search procedure.
  • 35. The method of claim 29, wherein, for each correlation iteration, the correlating further comprises: concurrently correlating the new set of received data samples with each of the number of segments.
  • 36. The method of claim 29, further comprising: selecting a correlation length; andwherein a total length of the sequential chips correlated depends on the correlation length and a predetermined group chip offset; andwherein the predetermined group chip offset depends on the number of base stations in a base station group in a communication network and a predetermined chip offset between two adjacent base stations in the base station group.
  • 37. The method of claim 29, further comprising: selecting a correlation length; andwherein a total length of the sequential chips correlated depends on the correlation length and a predetermined group chip offset; andwherein the number of successive correlation iterations depends on the selected correlation length and the number of segments being correlated during each correlation iteration.
  • 38. A method for identifying a scrambling code in received signals comprising: identifying a plurality of segments forming a plurality of sequential chips of a master scrambling code;configuring a first plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, each of the computational elements performing an arithmetic operation, via a switchable interconnection network coupled to the first plurality of heterogeneous computational elements as a scrambling code generator to generate the plurality of segments one segment at a time;configuring a second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements, each of the computational elements performing an arithmetic operation via the interconnection network, as a plurality of correlators having a first correlator, a last correlator and a plurality of intermediate correlators coupled between the first correlator and the last correlator;populating each of the plurality of correlators with a corresponding segment generated by the scrambling code generator;iteratively and successively correlating corresponding segments with corresponding sets of received data samples; andfor each correlation iteration: providing a new set of received data samples;correlating the new set of received data samples with corresponding segments and storing respective correlation results;transferring the corresponding segments of the plurality of intermediate correlators and the last correlator to their respective next correlators;transferring to the last correlator a next corresponding segment generated by the scrambling code generator.
  • 39. The method of claim 38, wherein the interconnection network reconfigures some of the second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements configured as the first correlator are reconfigured as one of the remaining correlators.
  • 40. The method of claim 38, wherein at least one of the first plurality of computational elements is one of the second plurality of computational elements, the second plurality of computational elements being configured after the plurality of segments is generated by the configured scrambling code generator.
  • 41. The method of claim 38, wherein the first and second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements and the interconnection network are on an integrated circuit.
  • 42. The method of clam 38, wherein the first and second plurality of heterogeneous computational elements and the interconnection network are incorporated on a mobile terminal.
  • 43. The method of claim 38, further comprising: for each correlation iteration, discarding the corresponding segment of the first correlator.
  • 44. The method of claim 38, wherein the plurality of correlators correlate concurrently.
  • 45. The method of claim 38, further comprising: selecting a correlation length;wherein a total length of the sequential chips correlated depends on the correlation length and a predetermined group chip offset; andwherein the predetermined group chip offset depends on the number of base stations in a base station group in a communication network and a predetermined chip offset between two adjacent base stations in the base station group.
  • 46. The method according to claim 45, wherein the communication network is a Wide-band Code Division Multiple Access (W-CDMA) communication network and the method is used in connection with acquisition of a downlink of a 3GPP standards body W-CDMA cell during stage 3 of a cell search procedure.
  • 47. The method of claim 38, further comprising: selecting a correlation length;wherein a total length of the sequential chips correlated depends on the correlation length and a predetermined group chip offset; andwherein the number of successive correlation iterations depends on the selected correlation length and the collective length of the sets of received data samples.
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 11/797,583, filed May 4, 2007, which is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 10/295,692, filed Nov. 14, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,215,701, which is a Continuation-In-Part application of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/015,531, filed on Dec. 12, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,088,825, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety as if set forth in full herein for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (538)
Number Name Date Kind
3409175 Byrne Nov 1968 A
3665171 Morrow May 1972 A
3666143 Weston May 1972 A
3938639 Birrell Feb 1976 A
3949903 Benasutti et al. Apr 1976 A
3960298 Birrell Jun 1976 A
3967062 Dobias Jun 1976 A
3991911 Shannon et al. Nov 1976 A
3995441 McMillin Dec 1976 A
4076145 Zygiel Feb 1978 A
4143793 McMillin et al. Mar 1979 A
4172669 Edelbach Oct 1979 A
4174872 Fessler Nov 1979 A
4181242 Zygiel et al. Jan 1980 A
RE30301 Zygiel Jun 1980 E
4218014 Tracy Aug 1980 A
4222972 Caldwell Sep 1980 A
4237536 Enelow et al. Dec 1980 A
4252253 Shannon Feb 1981 A
4302775 Widergren et al. Nov 1981 A
4333587 Fessler et al. Jun 1982 A
4354613 Desai et al. Oct 1982 A
4377246 McMillin et al. Mar 1983 A
4380046 Fung et al. Apr 1983 A
4393468 New Jul 1983 A
4413752 McMillin et al. Nov 1983 A
4458584 Annese et al. Jul 1984 A
4466342 Basile et al. Aug 1984 A
4475448 Shoaf et al. Oct 1984 A
4509690 Austin et al. Apr 1985 A
4520950 Jeans Jun 1985 A
4549675 Austin Oct 1985 A
4553573 McGarrah Nov 1985 A
4560089 McMillin et al. Dec 1985 A
4577782 Fessler Mar 1986 A
4578799 Scholl et al. Mar 1986 A
RE32179 Sedam et al. Jun 1986 E
4633386 Terepin et al. Dec 1986 A
4658988 Hassell Apr 1987 A
4694416 Wheeler et al. Sep 1987 A
4711374 Gaunt et al. Dec 1987 A
4713755 Worley, Jr. et al. Dec 1987 A
4719056 Scott Jan 1988 A
4726494 Scott Feb 1988 A
4747516 Baker May 1988 A
4748585 Chiarulli et al. May 1988 A
4758985 Carter Jul 1988 A
4760525 Webb Jul 1988 A
4760544 Lamb Jul 1988 A
4765513 McMillin et al. Aug 1988 A
4766548 Cedrone et al. Aug 1988 A
4781309 Vogel Nov 1988 A
4800492 Johnson et al. Jan 1989 A
4811214 Nosenchuck et al. Mar 1989 A
4824075 Holzboog Apr 1989 A
4827426 Patton et al. May 1989 A
4850269 Hancock et al. Jul 1989 A
4856684 Gerstung Aug 1989 A
4870302 Freeman Sep 1989 A
4901887 Burton Feb 1990 A
4905231 Leung et al. Feb 1990 A
4921315 Metcalfe et al. May 1990 A
4930666 Rudick Jun 1990 A
4932564 Austin et al. Jun 1990 A
4936488 Austin Jun 1990 A
4937019 Scott Jun 1990 A
4960261 Scott et al. Oct 1990 A
4961533 Teller et al. Oct 1990 A
4967340 Dawes Oct 1990 A
4974643 Bennett et al. Dec 1990 A
4982876 Scott Jan 1991 A
4993604 Gaunt et al. Feb 1991 A
5007560 Sassak Apr 1991 A
5021947 Campbell et al. Jun 1991 A
5040106 Maag Aug 1991 A
5044171 Farkas Sep 1991 A
5090015 Dabbish et al. Feb 1992 A
5099418 Pian et al. Mar 1992 A
5129549 Austin Jul 1992 A
5139708 Scott Aug 1992 A
5144166 Camarota et al. Sep 1992 A
5156301 Hassell et al. Oct 1992 A
5156871 Goulet et al. Oct 1992 A
5165023 Gifford Nov 1992 A
5165575 Scott Nov 1992 A
5177700 Göckler Jan 1993 A
5190083 Gupta et al. Mar 1993 A
5190189 Zimmer et al. Mar 1993 A
5193151 Jain Mar 1993 A
5193718 Hassell et al. Mar 1993 A
5202993 Tarsy et al. Apr 1993 A
5203474 Haynes Apr 1993 A
5218240 Camarota et al. Jun 1993 A
5240144 Feldman Aug 1993 A
5245227 Furtek et al. Sep 1993 A
5261099 Bigo et al. Nov 1993 A
5263509 Cherry et al. Nov 1993 A
5269442 Vogel Dec 1993 A
5280711 Motta et al. Jan 1994 A
5297400 Benton et al. Mar 1994 A
5301100 Wagner Apr 1994 A
5303846 Shannon Apr 1994 A
5335276 Thompson et al. Aug 1994 A
5336950 Popli et al. Aug 1994 A
5339428 Burmeister et al. Aug 1994 A
5343716 Swanson et al. Sep 1994 A
5361362 Benkeser et al. Nov 1994 A
5367651 Smith et al. Nov 1994 A
5367687 Tarsy et al. Nov 1994 A
5368198 Goulet Nov 1994 A
5379343 Grube et al. Jan 1995 A
5381546 Servi et al. Jan 1995 A
5381550 Jourdenais et al. Jan 1995 A
5388062 Knutson Feb 1995 A
5388212 Grube et al. Feb 1995 A
5392960 Kendt et al. Feb 1995 A
5437395 Bull et al. Aug 1995 A
5450557 Kopp et al. Sep 1995 A
5454406 Rejret et al. Oct 1995 A
5465368 Davidson et al. Nov 1995 A
5475856 Kogge Dec 1995 A
5479055 Eccles Dec 1995 A
5490165 Blakeney, II et al. Feb 1996 A
5491823 Ruttenberg Feb 1996 A
5504891 Motoyama et al. Apr 1996 A
5507009 Grube et al. Apr 1996 A
5515519 Yoshioka et al. May 1996 A
5517600 Shimokawa May 1996 A
5519694 Brewer et al. May 1996 A
5522070 Sumimoto May 1996 A
5530964 Alpert et al. Jun 1996 A
5534796 Edwards Jul 1996 A
5542265 Rutland Aug 1996 A
5553755 Bonewald et al. Sep 1996 A
5555417 Odnert et al. Sep 1996 A
5560028 Sachs et al. Sep 1996 A
5560038 Haddock Sep 1996 A
5570587 Kim Nov 1996 A
5572572 Kawan et al. Nov 1996 A
5590353 Sakakibara et al. Dec 1996 A
5594657 Cantone et al. Jan 1997 A
5600810 Ohkami Feb 1997 A
5600844 Shaw et al. Feb 1997 A
5602833 Zehavi Feb 1997 A
5603043 Taylor et al. Feb 1997 A
5607083 Vogel et al. Mar 1997 A
5608643 Wichter et al. Mar 1997 A
5611867 Cooper et al. Mar 1997 A
5623545 Childs et al. Apr 1997 A
5625669 McGregor et al. Apr 1997 A
5626407 Westcott May 1997 A
5630206 Urban et al. May 1997 A
5635940 Hickman et al. Jun 1997 A
5646544 Iadanza Jul 1997 A
5646545 Trimberger et al. Jul 1997 A
5647512 Assis Mascarenhas deOliveira et al. Jul 1997 A
5667110 McCann et al. Sep 1997 A
5684793 Kiema et al. Nov 1997 A
5684980 Casselman Nov 1997 A
5687236 Moskowitz et al. Nov 1997 A
5694613 Suzuki Dec 1997 A
5694794 Jerg et al. Dec 1997 A
5699328 Ishizaki et al. Dec 1997 A
5701398 Glier et al. Dec 1997 A
5701482 Harrison et al. Dec 1997 A
5704053 Santhanam Dec 1997 A
5706191 Bassett et al. Jan 1998 A
5706976 Purkey Jan 1998 A
5712996 Schepers Jan 1998 A
5720002 Wang Feb 1998 A
5721693 Song Feb 1998 A
5721854 Ebicioglu et al. Feb 1998 A
5729754 Estes Mar 1998 A
5732563 Bethuy et al. Mar 1998 A
5734808 Takeda Mar 1998 A
5737631 Trimberger Apr 1998 A
5742180 DeHon et al. Apr 1998 A
5742821 Prasanna Apr 1998 A
5745366 Highma et al. Apr 1998 A
RE35780 Hassell et al. May 1998 E
5751295 Becklund et al. May 1998 A
5754227 Fukuoka May 1998 A
5758261 Wiedeman May 1998 A
5768561 Wise Jun 1998 A
5778439 Trimberger et al. Jul 1998 A
5784636 Rupp Jul 1998 A
5787237 Reilly Jul 1998 A
5790817 Asghar et al. Aug 1998 A
5791517 Avital Aug 1998 A
5791523 Oh Aug 1998 A
5794062 Baxter Aug 1998 A
5794067 Kadowaki Aug 1998 A
5802055 Krein et al. Sep 1998 A
5812851 Levy et al. Sep 1998 A
5818603 Motoyama Oct 1998 A
5819255 Celis et al. Oct 1998 A
5822308 Weigand et al. Oct 1998 A
5822313 Malek et al. Oct 1998 A
5822360 Lee et al. Oct 1998 A
5828858 Athanas et al. Oct 1998 A
5829085 Jerg et al. Nov 1998 A
5835753 Witt Nov 1998 A
5838165 Chatter Nov 1998 A
5845815 Vogel Dec 1998 A
5854929 Van Pract et al. Dec 1998 A
5860021 Klingman Jan 1999 A
5862961 Motta et al. Jan 1999 A
5870427 Tiedemann, Jr. et al. Feb 1999 A
5873045 Lee et al. Feb 1999 A
5881106 Cartier Mar 1999 A
5884284 Peters et al. Mar 1999 A
5886537 Macias et al. Mar 1999 A
5887174 Simons et al. Mar 1999 A
5889816 Agrawal et al. Mar 1999 A
5889989 Robertazzi et al. Mar 1999 A
5890014 Long Mar 1999 A
5892900 Ginter et al. Apr 1999 A
5892950 Rigori et al. Apr 1999 A
5892961 Trimberger Apr 1999 A
5892962 Cloutier Apr 1999 A
5894473 Dent Apr 1999 A
5901884 Goulet et al. May 1999 A
5903886 Heimlich et al. May 1999 A
5907285 Toms et al. May 1999 A
5907580 Cummings May 1999 A
5910733 Bertolet et al. Jun 1999 A
5912572 Graf, III Jun 1999 A
5913172 McCabe et al. Jun 1999 A
5917852 Butterfield et al. Jun 1999 A
5920801 Thomas et al. Jul 1999 A
5931918 Row et al. Aug 1999 A
5933642 Greenbaum et al. Aug 1999 A
5940438 Poon et al. Aug 1999 A
5949415 Lin et al. Sep 1999 A
5950011 Albrecht et al. Sep 1999 A
5950131 Vilmur Sep 1999 A
5951674 Moreno Sep 1999 A
5953322 Kimball Sep 1999 A
5956518 DeHon et al. Sep 1999 A
5956967 Kim Sep 1999 A
5959811 Richardson Sep 1999 A
5959881 Trimberger et al. Sep 1999 A
5963048 Harrison et al. Oct 1999 A
5966534 Cooke et al. Oct 1999 A
5970254 Cooke et al. Oct 1999 A
5987105 Jenkins et al. Nov 1999 A
5987611 Freund Nov 1999 A
5991302 Berl et al. Nov 1999 A
5991308 Fuhrmann et al. Nov 1999 A
5993739 Lyon Nov 1999 A
5999734 Willis et al. Dec 1999 A
6005943 Cohen et al. Dec 1999 A
6006249 Leong Dec 1999 A
6016395 Mohamed Jan 2000 A
6021186 Suzuki et al. Feb 2000 A
6021492 May Feb 2000 A
6023742 Ebeling et al. Feb 2000 A
6023755 Casselman Feb 2000 A
6028610 Deering Feb 2000 A
6036166 Olson Mar 2000 A
6039219 Bach et al. Mar 2000 A
6041322 Meng et al. Mar 2000 A
6041970 Vogel Mar 2000 A
6046603 New Apr 2000 A
6047115 Mohan et al. Apr 2000 A
6052600 Fette et al. Apr 2000 A
6055314 Spies et al. Apr 2000 A
6056194 Kolls May 2000 A
6059840 Click, Jr. May 2000 A
6061580 Altschul et al. May 2000 A
6073132 Gehman Jun 2000 A
6076174 Freund Jun 2000 A
6078736 Guccione Jun 2000 A
6085740 Ivri et al. Jul 2000 A
6088043 Kelleher et al. Jul 2000 A
6091263 New et al. Jul 2000 A
6091765 Pietzold, III et al. Jul 2000 A
6094065 Tavana et al. Jul 2000 A
6094726 Gonion et al. Jul 2000 A
6111893 Volftsun et al. Aug 2000 A
6111935 Hughes-Hartogs Aug 2000 A
6112218 Gandhi et al. Aug 2000 A
6115751 Tam et al. Sep 2000 A
6119178 Martin et al. Sep 2000 A
6120551 Law et al. Sep 2000 A
6122670 Bennett et al. Sep 2000 A
6128307 Brown Oct 2000 A
6134605 Hudson et al. Oct 2000 A
6138693 Matz Oct 2000 A
6141283 Bogin et al. Oct 2000 A
6150838 Wittig et al. Nov 2000 A
6154494 Sugahara et al. Nov 2000 A
6157997 Oowaki et al. Dec 2000 A
6158031 Mack et al. Dec 2000 A
6173389 Pechanek et al. Jan 2001 B1
6175854 Bretscher Jan 2001 B1
6175892 Sazzad et al. Jan 2001 B1
6181981 Varga et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185418 MacLellan et al. Feb 2001 B1
6192070 Poon et al. Feb 2001 B1
6192255 Lewis et al. Feb 2001 B1
6192388 Cajolet Feb 2001 B1
6195788 Leaver et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198924 Ishii et al. Mar 2001 B1
6199181 Rechef et al. Mar 2001 B1
6202130 Scales, III et al. Mar 2001 B1
6202189 Hinedi et al. Mar 2001 B1
6219697 Lawande et al. Apr 2001 B1
6219756 Kasamizugami Apr 2001 B1
6219780 Lipasti Apr 2001 B1
6223222 Fijolek et al. Apr 2001 B1
6226387 Tewfik et al. May 2001 B1
6230307 Davis et al. May 2001 B1
6237029 Master et al. May 2001 B1
6246883 Lee Jun 2001 B1
6247125 Noel-Baron et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249251 Chang et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258725 Lee et al. Jul 2001 B1
6263057 Silverman Jul 2001 B1
6266760 DeHon et al. Jul 2001 B1
6272579 Lentz et al. Aug 2001 B1
6272616 Fernando et al. Aug 2001 B1
6279020 Dujardin et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281703 Furuta et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282627 Wong et al. Aug 2001 B1
6286134 Click, Jr. et al. Sep 2001 B1
6289375 Knight et al. Sep 2001 B1
6289434 Roy Sep 2001 B1
6289488 Dave et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292822 Hardwick Sep 2001 B1
6292827 Raz Sep 2001 B1
6292830 Taylor et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292938 Sarkar et al. Sep 2001 B1
6301653 Mohamed et al. Oct 2001 B1
6305014 Roediger et al. Oct 2001 B1
6311149 Ryan et al. Oct 2001 B1
6321985 Kolls Nov 2001 B1
6326806 Fallside et al. Dec 2001 B1
6346824 New Feb 2002 B1
6347346 Taylor Feb 2002 B1
6349394 Brock et al. Feb 2002 B1
6353841 Marshall et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356994 Barry et al. Mar 2002 B1
6359248 Mardi Mar 2002 B1
6360256 Lim Mar 2002 B1
6360259 Bradley Mar 2002 B1
6360263 Kurtzberg et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363411 Dugan et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366999 Drabenstott et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377983 Cohen et al. Apr 2002 B1
6378072 Collins et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381293 Lee et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381735 Hunt Apr 2002 B1
6385751 Wolf May 2002 B1
6405214 Meade, II Jun 2002 B1
6408039 Ito Jun 2002 B1
6410941 Taylor et al. Jun 2002 B1
6411612 Halford et al. Jun 2002 B1
6421372 Bierly et al. Jul 2002 B1
6421809 Wuytack et al. Jul 2002 B1
6426649 Fu et al. Jul 2002 B1
6430624 Jamtgaard et al. Aug 2002 B1
6433578 Wasson Aug 2002 B1
6434590 Blelloch et al. Aug 2002 B1
6438737 Morelli et al. Aug 2002 B1
6446258 McKinsey et al. Sep 2002 B1
6449747 Wuytack et al. Sep 2002 B2
6456996 Crawford, Jr. et al. Sep 2002 B1
6459883 Subramanian et al. Oct 2002 B2
6467009 Winegarden et al. Oct 2002 B1
6469540 Nakaya Oct 2002 B2
6473609 Schwartz et al. Oct 2002 B1
6483343 Faith et al. Nov 2002 B1
6507947 Schreiber et al. Jan 2003 B1
6510138 Pannell Jan 2003 B1
6510510 Garde Jan 2003 B1
6526570 Click, Jr. et al. Feb 2003 B1
6538470 Langhammer et al. Mar 2003 B1
6556044 Langhammer et al. Apr 2003 B2
6563891 Eriksson et al. May 2003 B1
6570877 Kloth et al. May 2003 B1
6577678 Scheuermann Jun 2003 B2
6587684 Hsu et al. Jul 2003 B1
6590415 Agrawal et al. Jul 2003 B2
6601086 Howard et al. Jul 2003 B1
6601158 Abbott et al. Jul 2003 B1
6604085 Kolls Aug 2003 B1
6604189 Zemlyak et al. Aug 2003 B1
6606529 Crowder, Jr. et al. Aug 2003 B1
6615333 Hoogerbrugge et al. Sep 2003 B1
6618434 Heidari-Bateni et al. Sep 2003 B2
6640304 Ginter et al. Oct 2003 B2
6647429 Semal Nov 2003 B1
6653859 Sihlbom et al. Nov 2003 B2
6675265 Barroso et al. Jan 2004 B2
6675284 Warren Jan 2004 B1
6691148 Zinky et al. Feb 2004 B1
6694380 Wolrich et al. Feb 2004 B1
6711617 Bantz et al. Mar 2004 B1
6718182 Kung Apr 2004 B1
6718541 Ostanevich et al. Apr 2004 B2
6721286 Williams et al. Apr 2004 B1
6721884 De Oliveira Kastrup Pereira et al. Apr 2004 B1
6732354 Ebeling et al. May 2004 B2
6735621 Yoakum et al. May 2004 B1
6738744 Kirovski et al. May 2004 B2
6748360 Pitman et al. Jun 2004 B2
6751723 Kundu et al. Jun 2004 B1
6754470 Hendrickson et al. Jun 2004 B2
6760587 Holtzman et al. Jul 2004 B2
6760833 Dowling Jul 2004 B1
6766165 Sharma et al. Jul 2004 B2
6778212 Deng et al. Aug 2004 B1
6785341 Walton et al. Aug 2004 B2
6819140 Yamanaka et al. Nov 2004 B2
6823448 Roth et al. Nov 2004 B2
6829633 Gelfer et al. Dec 2004 B2
6832250 Coons et al. Dec 2004 B1
6836836 Shinozaki Dec 2004 B2
6836839 Master et al. Dec 2004 B2
6854002 Conway et al. Feb 2005 B2
6859434 Segal et al. Feb 2005 B2
6865664 Budrovic et al. Mar 2005 B2
6871236 Fishman et al. Mar 2005 B2
6883084 Donohoe Apr 2005 B1
6894996 Lee May 2005 B2
6901440 Bimm et al. May 2005 B1
6912515 Jackson et al. Jun 2005 B2
6941336 Mar Sep 2005 B1
6980515 Schunk et al. Dec 2005 B1
6985517 Matsumoto et al. Jan 2006 B2
6986021 Master et al. Jan 2006 B2
6986142 Ehlig et al. Jan 2006 B1
6988139 Jervis et al. Jan 2006 B1
7032229 Flores et al. Apr 2006 B1
7044741 Leem May 2006 B2
7050486 Yasaki May 2006 B2
7082456 Mani-Meitav et al. Jul 2006 B2
7088825 Sambhwani et al. Aug 2006 B2
7139910 Ainsworth et al. Nov 2006 B1
7142731 Toi Nov 2006 B1
7215701 Sambhwani et al. May 2007 B2
7249242 Ramchandran Jul 2007 B2
7668229 Sambhwani et al. Feb 2010 B2
20010003191 Kovacs et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010023482 Wray Sep 2001 A1
20010029515 Mirsky Oct 2001 A1
20010034795 Moulton et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010039654 Miyamoto Nov 2001 A1
20010048713 Medlock et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010048714 Jha Dec 2001 A1
20010050948 Ramberg et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020010848 Kamano et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020013799 Blaker Jan 2002 A1
20020013937 Ostanevich et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020015435 Rieken Feb 2002 A1
20020015439 Kohli et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020023210 Tuomenoksa et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020024942 Tsuneki et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020024993 Subramanian et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020031166 Subramanian et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020032551 Zakiya Mar 2002 A1
20020035623 Lawande et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020041581 Aramaki Apr 2002 A1
20020042875 Shukla Apr 2002 A1
20020042907 Yamanaka et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020061741 Leung et al. May 2002 A1
20020069282 Reisman Jun 2002 A1
20020072830 Hunt Jun 2002 A1
20020078337 Moreau et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020083305 Renard et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020083423 Ostanevich et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020087829 Snyder et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020089348 Langhammer Jul 2002 A1
20020101909 Chen et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020107905 Roe et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020107962 Richter et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020119803 Bitterlich et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120672 Butt et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020133688 Lee et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138716 Master et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020141489 Imaizumi Oct 2002 A1
20020147845 Sanchez-Herrero et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020159503 Ramachandran Oct 2002 A1
20020162026 Neuman et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020167997 Kim et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020168018 Scheuermann Nov 2002 A1
20020181559 Heidari-Bateni et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020184275 Dutta et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020184291 Hogenauer Dec 2002 A1
20020184498 Qi Dec 2002 A1
20020191790 Anand et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030007606 Suder et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030012270 Zhou et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018446 Makowski et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018700 Giroti et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030023649 Kamiya et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030023830 Hogenauer Jan 2003 A1
20030026242 Jokinen et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030030004 Dixon et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030046421 Horvitz et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030061260 Rajkumar Mar 2003 A1
20030061311 Lo Mar 2003 A1
20030063656 Rao et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030074473 Pham et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030076815 Miller et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030099223 Chang et al. May 2003 A1
20030102889 Master et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030105949 Master et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030108203 Sambhwani et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030110485 Lu et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030123666 Sambhwani et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030142818 Raghunathan et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030154357 Master et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030163723 Kozuch et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030172138 McCormack et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030172139 Srinivasan et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030200538 Ebeling et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030212684 Meyer et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030229864 Watkins Dec 2003 A1
20040006584 Vandeweerd Jan 2004 A1
20040010645 Scheuermann et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015970 Scheuermann Jan 2004 A1
20040025159 Scheuermann et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040057505 Valio Mar 2004 A1
20040062300 McDonough et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040081248 Parolari Apr 2004 A1
20040086027 Shattil May 2004 A1
20040093479 Ramchandran May 2004 A1
20040168044 Ramchandran Aug 2004 A1
20040174932 Warke et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050044344 Stevens Feb 2005 A1
20050166038 Wang et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050190871 Sedarat Sep 2005 A1
20050198199 Dowling Sep 2005 A1
20060031660 Master et al. Feb 2006 A1
20070217486 Sambhwani et al. Sep 2007 A1
20090268789 Sambhwani et al. Oct 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (54)
Number Date Country
100 18 374 Oct 2001 DE
0 301 169 Feb 1989 EP
0 166 586 Jan 1991 EP
0 236 633 May 1991 EP
0 478 624 Apr 1992 EP
0 479 102 Apr 1992 EP
0 661 831 Jul 1995 EP
0 668 659 Aug 1995 EP
0 690 588 Jan 1996 EP
0 691 754 Jan 1996 EP
0 768 602 Apr 1997 EP
0 817 003 Jan 1998 EP
0 821 495 Jan 1998 EP
0 866 210 Sep 1998 EP
0 923 247 Jun 1999 EP
0 926 596 Jun 1999 EP
1 056 217 Nov 2000 EP
1056217 Nov 2000 EP
1 061 437 Dec 2000 EP
1 061 443 Dec 2000 EP
1 126 368 Aug 2001 EP
1 150 506 Oct 2001 EP
1 189 358 Mar 2002 EP
189358 Mar 2002 EP
2 067 800 Jul 1981 GB
2 237 908 May 1991 GB
62-249456 Oct 1987 JP
63-147258 Jun 1988 JP
4-51546 Feb 1992 JP
7-064789 Mar 1995 JP
7066718 Mar 1995 JP
10233676 Sep 1998 JP
10254696 Sep 1998 JP
11296345 Oct 1999 JP
2000315731 Nov 2000 JP
2001-053703 Feb 2001 JP
WO 8905029 Jun 1989 WO
WO 8911443 Nov 1989 WO
WO 9100238 Jan 1991 WO
WO 9313603 Jul 1993 WO
WO 9511855 May 1995 WO
WO 9633558 Oct 1996 WO
WO 9832071 Jul 1998 WO
WO 9903776 Jan 1999 WO
WO 9921094 Apr 1999 WO
WO 9926860 Jun 1999 WO
WO 9965818 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0019311 Apr 2000 WO
WO 0065855 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0069073 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0111281 Feb 2001 WO
WO 0122235 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0176129 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0212978 Feb 2002 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (145)
Entry
Abnous et al., “Ultra-Low-Power Domain-Specific Multimedia Processors,” VLSI Signal Processing, IX, 1998, IEEE Workshop in San Francisco, CA, USA, Oct. 30-Nov. 1, 1998, pp. 461-470.
Aggarwal et al.., “Efficient Huffman Decoding,” International Conference on Image Processing IEEE 1:936-939 (Sep. 10-13, 2000).
Allan et al., “Software Pipelining,” ACM Computing Surveys, 27(3):1-78 (Sep. 1995).
Alsolaim et al., “Architecture and Application of a Dynamically Reconfigurable Hardware Array for Future Mobile Communication Systems,” Field Programmable Custom Computing Machines, 2000 IEEE Symposium, Napa Valley, Los Alamitos, CA. IEEE Comput. Soc. pp. 205-214 (Apr. 17-19, 2000).
Ashenden et al., “The VHDL Cookbook,” Dept. Computer Science, University of Adelaide, South Australia. Downloaded from http://tams-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/vhdl/doc/cookbook/VHDL-Cookbook.pdf on Dec. 7, 2006 (Jul. 1990).
Bacon et al., “Compiler Transformations for High-Performance Computing,” ACM Computing Surveys 26(4):368-373 (Dec. 1994).
Balasubramonian et al., “Reducing the Complexity of the Register File in Dynamic Superscalar Processors,” Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pp. 237-248 (Dec. 1, 2001).
Banerjee et al., “A MATLAB Compiler for Distributed, Heterogeneous, Reconfigurable Computing Systems,” 2000 IEEE Symposium, pp. 39-48, (Apr. 17-19, 2000).
Bapte et al., “Uniform Execution Environment for Dynamic Reconfiguration,” Darpa Adaptive Computing Systems, http://isis.vanderbilt.edu/publications/archive/babty—T—#—0—1999—Uniform—Ex.pdf, pp. 1-7 (1999).
Baumgarte et al., “PACT XPP—A Self-Reconfigurable Data Processing Architecture,” NN www.pactcorp.com/sneu/download/ersa01.pdf; retrieved on Nov. 25, 2005 (Jun. 25, 2001).
Becker et al., “An Application-Tailored Dynamically Reconfigurable Hardware Architecture for Digital Baseband Processing,” IEEE Conference Proceedings Article pp. 341-346 (Sep. 18, 2000).
Becker et al., “Design and Implementation of a Coarse-Grained Dynamically Reconfigurable Hardware Architecture,” VLSI 2001, Proceedings IEEE Computer Soc. Workshop, Piscataway, NJ, USA, pp. 41-46 (Apr. 19-20, 2001).
Bevstar, BevStar Bottled Water Model Advertisement Automatic Merchandiser at www.AMonline.com (2005).
Bevstar, BevStar Point of Use Water Model Advertisement Automatic Merchandiser at www.AMonline.com (2005).
Bishop & Loucks, “A Heterogeneous Environment for Hardware/Software Cosimulation,” Proceedings of the 30th Annual Simulation Symposium, pp. 14-22 (Apr. 7-9, 1997).
Brakensiek et al., “Re-Configurable Multi-Standard Terminal for Heterogeneous Networks,” Radio and Wireless Conference, Rawcon 2002 IEEE. pp. 27-30 (2002).
Brown et al., “Quick PDA Data Exchange,” PC Magazine pp. 1-3 (May 22, 2001).
Buck et al., “Ptolemy: A Framework for Simulating and Prototyping Heterogeneous Systems,” International Journal of Computer Simulation 4:155-182 (Apr. 1994).
Burns et al., “A Dynamic Reconfiguration Run-Time System,” Proceedings of the 5th Annual Symposium on Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines, pp. 166-175 (Apr. 16, 1997).
Business Wire, “Whirlpool Internet-Enabled Appliances to Use Beeline Shopper Software Features,” http://www.whirlpoocorp.com/news/releases/release.asp?rid=90 (Feb. 16, 2001).
Buttazzo et al., “Optimal Deadline Assignment for Scheduling Soft Aperiodic Tasks in Hard Real-Time Environments,” Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Como, pp. 39-48 (Sep. 8, 1997).
Callahan et al., “Adapting Software Pipelining for Reconfigurable Computing,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Compilers, Architectrue and Synthesis for Embedded Systems p. 8, ACM (Cases '00, San Jose, CA) (Nov. 17-18, 2000).
Chapman & Mehrotra, “OpenMP and HPF: Integrating Two Paradigms,” Proceedings of the 4th International Euro-Par Conference (Euro-Par'98), Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1470:650-658 (1998).
Chen et al., “A Reconfigurable Multiprocessor IC for Rapid Prototyping of Algorithmic-Specific High-Speed DSP Data Paths,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, IEEE 35:74-75 (Feb. 1, 2001).
Clarke, “Embedded Solutions Enters Development Pact with Marconi,” EETimes Online (Jan. 26, 2000).
Compton & Hauck, “Reconfigurable Computing: A Survey of Systems and Software,” ACM Press, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 34(2):171-210 (Jun. 2002).
Compton et al., “Configuration Relocation and Defragmentation for Run-Time Reconfigurable Computing,” Northwestern University, http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/compton00configuration.html, pp. 1-17 (2000).
Conte et al., “Dynamic Rescheduling: A Technique for Object Code Compatibility in VLIW Architectures,” Proceedings of the 28th Annulal International Symposium on Microarchitecture pp. 208-218 (Nov. 29, 1995).
Conte et al., “Instruction Fetch Mechanisms for VLIW Architectures with Compressed Encodings,” Proceedings of the Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO) 29:201-211 (Dec. 2, 1996).
Cray Research Inc., “Cray T3E Fortran Optimization Guide,” Ver. 004-2518-002, Section 4.5 (Jan. 1999).
Cummings et al., “FPGA in the Software Radio,” IEEE Communications Magazine . 37(2):108-112 (Feb. 1999).
Dandalis et al., “An Adaptive Cryptograhic Engine for IPSec Architectures,” IEEE pp. 132-141 (Jan. 2000).
David et al., “DART: A Dynamically Reconfigurable Architecture Dealing with Future Mobile Telecommunication Constraints,” Proceedings of the International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium pp. 156-163 (Apr. 15, 2002).
Deepakumara et al., “FPGA Implementation of MD5 has Algorithm,” Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, IEEE (2001).
Dehon et al., “Reconfigurable Computing: What, Why and Implications for Design Automation,” Design Automation Conference Proceedings pp. 610-615 (1999).
Dipert, “Figuring Out Reconfigurable Logic,” EDN 44(16):107-114 (Aug. 5, 1999).
Dominikus, “A Hardware Implementation of MD4-Family Hash Algorithms,” 9th International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems IEEE (2002).
Dorband, “aCe C Language Reference Guide,” Online (Archived Mar. 2001), http://web.archive.org/web/20000616053819/http://newton.gsfc.nasa.gov/aCe/aCe—dir/aCe—cc—Ref.html (Mar. 2001).
Drozdowski, “Scheduling Multiprocessor Tasks—An Overview,” Instytut Informatyki Politechnika, pp. 1-31 (Jan. 31, 1996).
Ebeling et al., “RaPiD Reconfigurable Pipelined Datapath,” Springer-Verlag, 6th International Workshop on Field-Programmable Logic and Applications pp. 126-135 (1996).
Fawer et al., “A Multiprocessor Approach for Implementing a Time-Diversity Spread Specturm Receiver,” Proceeding sof the 1990 International Zurich Seminal on Digital Communications, pp. 173-180 (Mar. 5-8, 1990).
Fisher, “Gone Flat,” Forbes pp. 76-79 (Oct. 2001).
Fleischmann et al., “Prototyping Networked Embedded Systems,” Integrated Engineering, pp. 116-119 (Feb. 1999).
Forbes “Best of the Web—Computer Networking/Consumer Durables,” The Forbes Magnetic 40 p. 80 (May 2001).
Gibson, “Fresh Technologies Will Create Myriad Functions,” FT Information Technology Review; World Wide Web at http://technews.acm.org/articles/2000-2/0301w.html?searchterm=%22fresh+technologies%22 (Mar. 1, 2000).
Gluth, “Integrierte Signalprozessoren,” Elektronik 35(18):112-118 Franzis Verlag GMBH, Munich, Germany (Sep. 5, 1986).
Gokhale & Schlesinger, “A Data Parallel C and Its Platforms,” Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on the Frontiers of Massively Parallel Computation pp. 194-202 (Frontiers '95) (Feb. 1995).
Grimm et al., “A System Architecture for Pervasive Computing,” Washington University, pp. 1-6 (Sep. 2000).
Halbwachs et al., “The Synchronous Data Flow Programming Language Lustre,” Proceedings of the IEEE 79(9):1305-1319 (Sep. 1991).
Hammes et al., “Cameron: High Level Language Compilation for Reconfigurable Systems,” Proc. of the Intl. Conf. on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques, pp. 236-244 (Oct. 1999).
Hartenstein, “Coarse Grain Reconfigurable Architectures,” Design Automation Conference, 2001. Proceedings of the ASP-Dac 2001, Asian and South Pacific Jan. 30-Feb. 2, 2001, Piscataway, NJ, US, IEEE, pp. 564-569.
Heinz, “An Efficiently Compliable Extension of {M}odula-3 for Problem-Oriented Explicitly Parallel Programming,” Proceedings of the Joint Symposium on Parallel Processing (May 1993).
Hinden et al., “The DARPA Internet: Interconnecting Heterogeneous Computer Networks with Gateways,” IEEE Computer Magazine pp. 38-48 (1983).
Horton, “Beginning Java 2: JDK 1.3 Edition,” Wrox Press, Chapter 8, pp. 313-316 (Feb. 2001).
Huff et al., “Lifetime-Sensitive Modulo Scheduling,” 6th Conference on Programming Language, Design and Implementation, pp. 258-267, ACM (1993).
IBM, “Multisequencing a Single Instruction Stream Scheduling with Space-time Trade-offs,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin 36(2):105-108 (Feb. 1, 1993).
IEEE, “IEEE Standard Verilog Hardware Description Language,” downloaded from http://inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/˜cs150/fa06/Labs/verilog-ieee.pdf on Dec. 7, 2006 (Sep. 2001).
Internet Wire, Sunbeam Joins Microsoft in University Plug and Play Forum to Establish A “Universal” Smart Appliance Technology Standard (Mar. 23, 2000).
Ishii et al., “Parallel Variable Length Decoding with Inverse Quantization for Software MPEG-2 Decoders,” Workshop on Signal Processing Systems, Design and Implementation, IEEE pp. 500-509 (Nov. 3-5, 1997).
Isoworth, “Isoworth Beverage Dispensing Technology Worldwide Company,” Brochure (May 22, 2000).
Jain et al., “An Alternative Approach Towards the Design of Control Units,” Microelectronics and Reliability 24(6):1009-1012 (1984).
Jain, “Parallel Processing with the TMS320C40 Parallel Digital Signal Processor,” Sonitech International Inc., pp. 13-46. Retrieved from: http.//www-s.ti.com/sc/psheets/spra031/spra031.pdf retrieved on Apr. 14, 2004 (Feb. 1994).
Janssen et al., “Partitioned Register File for TTAs,” Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pp. 303-312 (Nov. 1995).
Jong-Pyng et al., “Real-Time Virtual Channel Flow Control,” Proceedings of the Annual International Phoenix Conference on Computers and Communications, Conf. 13, pp. 97-103 (Apr. 12, 1994).
Jung et al., “Efficient Hardware Controller Synthesis for Synchronous Dataflow Graph in System Level Design,” Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on System Synthesis pp. 79-84 (ISSS'00) (Sep. 2000).
Kaufmann et al., “Digital Spread-Spectrum Multipath-Diversity Receiver for Indoor Communication,” from Pioneers to the 21st Century; Denver, Proceedings of the Vehicular Technology Socity [sic] Conference, NY, IEEE, US 2(Conf. 42):1038-1041 (May 10-13, 1992).
Kneip et al., “An Algorithm Adapted Autonomous Controlling Concept for a Parallel Single-Chip Digital Signal Processor,” Journal of VLSI Signal Processing Systems for Signal, Image, an dVideo Technology 16(1):31-40 (May 1, 1997).
Lee & Messerschmitt, “Pipeline Interleaved Programmable DSP's: Synchronous Data Flow Programming,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing ASSP-35(9):1334-1345 (Sep. 1987).
Lee & Messerschmitt, “Synchronous Data Flow,” Proceedings of the IEEE 75(9):1235-1245 (Sep. 1987).
Lee & Parks, “Dataflow Process Networks,” Proceedings of the IEEE 83(5):773-799 (May 1995).
Liu et al., “Scheduling Algorithms for Multiprogramming in a Hard-Real-Time Environment,” Journal of the Association for Computing 20(1):46-61 (1973).
Llosa et al., “Lifetime-Sensitive Modulo Scheduling in a Production Environment,” IEEE Trans. on Comps. 50(3):234-249 (Mar. 2001).
Lu et al., “The Morphosys Dynamically Reconfigurable System-On-Chip,” Proceedings of the First NASA/DOD Workshop on Evolvable Hardware, pp. 152-160 (Jul. 19, 1999).
Mangione-Smith et al., “Seeking Solutions in Configurable Computing,” Computer 30(12):38-43 (Dec. 1997).
Manion, “Network CPU Adds Spice,” Electronic Engineering Times, Issue 1126 (Aug. 14, 2000).
Mascia & Ishii., “Neural Net Implementation on Single-Chip Digital Signal Processor,” IEEE (1989).
McGraw, “Parallel Functional Programming in Sisal: Fictions, Facts, and Future,” Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory pp. 1-40 (Jul. 1993).
Najjar et al., “High-Level Language Abstraction for Reconfigurable Computing,” Computer 36(8):63-69 (Aug. 2003).
Nichols et al., “Data Management and Control-Flow Constructs in a SIMD/SPMD Parallel Language/Compiler,” Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on the Frontiers of Massively Parallel Computation pp. 397-406 (Oct. 1990).
OpenMP Architecture Review Board, “OpenMP C and C++ Application Program Interface,” pp. 7-16 (Oct. 1998).
Oracle Corporation, “Oracle8i JDBC Developer's Guide and Reference,” Release 3, 8.1.7, pp. 10-8-10-10 (Jul. 2000).
Pauer et al., “Algorithm Analysis and Mapping Environment for Adaptive Computing Systems: Further Results,” Proc. IEEE Symposium on FPGA's for Custom Computing Machines (FCCM), Napa CA (1999).
Pauer et al., “Algorithm Analysis and Mapping Environment for Adaptive Computing Systems,” Presentation slides, Third Bi-annual Ptolemy Miniconference (1999).
Ramamritham et al., “On Scheduling Algorithms for Real-Time Multiprocessor Systems,” Algorithms and Applications, Proceedings of the International conference on Parallel Processing 3:143-152 (Aug. 8, 1989).
Schneider, “A Parallel/Serial Trade-Off Methodology for Look-Up Table Based Decoders,” Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference 34:498-503 (Jun. 9-13, 1997).
Sidhu et al., “A Self-Reconfigurable Gate Array Architecture,” 10 International Workshop on Field Programmable Logic and Applications http://coblitz.codeen.org:3125/citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/papers/cs/17524/http:zS zzSzmaarcii.usc.eduzSzPublicationsZSzsidhu—fp100.pdf/sidhu00selfreconfigurable.pdf retrieved on Jun. 21, 2006 (Sep. 1, 2001).
Smith, “Intro to ASICs: ASIC Cell Libraries,” at http://iroi.seu.edu.cn/books/asics/Book2/CH01/CH01.5.htm, printed on Feb. 4, 2005 (Jun. 1997).
Souza, “ Computing's New Face—Reconfigurable Devices Could Rattle Supply Chain,” Electronic Buyers' News Issue 1205, p. P.1 (Apr. 3, 2000).
Souza, “Quicksilver Buys White Eagle,” Electronic Buyers News, Issue 1220 (Jul. 17, 2000).
Sriram et al., “MPEG-2 Video Decoding on the TMS320C6X DSP Architecture,” Conference Record of the 32nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, IEEE pp. 1735-1739 (Nov. 1-4, 1998).
Steiner, “Coke Chief's Latest Daft Idea—A Cola Tap in Every House,” Sunday Times (Mar. 2001).
Sun Microsystems, “FORTRAN 3.0.1 User's Guide, Revision A,” pp. 57-68 (Aug. 1994).
Svensson, “Co's Join on Home Web Wiring Network,” Associated Press Online printed on Apr. 30, 2008 (Jun. 2000).
Tang et al., “Thread Partitioning and Scheduling Based on Cost Model,” Proceedings of the Ninth Annual ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures, pp. 272-281 Retrieved from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/258492.2585 retrieved on Aug. 25, 2004 (1997).
Vaya, “VITURBO: A Reconfigurable Architecture for Ubiquitous Wireless Networks,” A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science; RICE University (Aug. 2002).
Wang et al., “Cell Search in W-CDMA,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 18(8):1470-1482 (Aug. 2000).
Wardell, “Help for Hurried Cooks?,” Popular Science, p. 32 (May 2000).
Whiting & Pascoe, “A History of Data-Flow Languages,” IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 16(4):38-59 (1994).
Williamson & Lee, “Synthesis of Parallel Hardware Implementations from Synchronous Dataflow Graph Specifications,” Conference Record of the Thirtieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers 1340-1343 (Nov. 1996).
Wirthlin et al., “A Dynamic Instruction Set Computer,” Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on FPGA's for Custom Computing Machines, pp. 99-107 (Apr. 21, 1995).
www.appliancemagazine.com, World Wide Web at http://web.archive.org/web/20000511085402/http://www.appliancemagazine.com/ printed on Apr. 30, 2008.
www.bestrom.com, BreakMateTM from www.bestrom.com printed on Apr. 29, 2008.
www.beverageexpress.com, Beverage Express from www.beverageexpress.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008.
www.bevstar.com, Isoworth Beverage Dispensing Technology Worldwide from www.bevstar.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008.
www.bonator.com, from The World Wide Web at http://web.archive.org/web/20000510102440/http.//www.bonator.com/ printed on Apr. 30, 2008.
www.ecommerce.dewpointinc.com, Swiss Mountain Coffees from www.ecommerce.dewpointinc.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008.
www.gateway.com, World Wide Web, http://web.archive.org/web/20000229192734/www.gateway.com/productpages/9300splash/index.shtml Available on Mar. 3, 2000, 1 page (Mar. 3, 2000).
www.icl.com, from the World Wide Web at http.//www.icl.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008.
www.margherita2000.com; from Margherita2000.com printed Apr. 30, 2008 (Jan. 26, 2001).
www.sodaclubenterprises.com, Soda-Club Enterprises from www.sodaclubenterprises.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008.
www.symbol.com, Symbol from www.symbol.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008.
www.wunderbar.com, Wunder-Bar Dispensing Systems from www.wunderbar.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008.
Xilinx, “Virtex-II Pro Platform FPGAs: Functional Description DS083-2 (v2.5),” Product Specification, pp. 13-46 (Jan. 20, 2003).
Young, “Architecture Powers up IPSec, SSL,” EETimes, Los Gatos, CA, pp. 1-4 http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20011102S0065 (Nov. 2, 2001).
Yuan et al., “A Decomposition Approach to Non-Preemptive Real-Time Scheduling,” Real Time Systems 6(1):7-35 (1994).
Zaino et al., “Algorithm Analysis and Mapping Environment for Adaptive Computing Systems,” Final Technical Report, DARPA Contract F33615-97-C-1174 (Sep. 2001).
Zhang et al., “A 1V Heterogeneous Reconfigurable Processor IC for Baseband Wireless Applications,” 2000 IEEE Solid.
Adl-Tabatabai et al., “Code Reuse in an Optimizing Compiler,” OOPSLA, ACM pp. 51-68 (1996).
Altera Apex 20K 1999.
Andraka Consulting Group, “Distributed Arithmetic,” Obtained from: http.//www.fpga-guru.com/distribu.htm (1998-2000).
Bickerstaff et al., “A Unified Turbo/Viterbi Channel Decoder for 3GPP Mobile Wireless in 0.18μ CMOS,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 37(11):1555-62 (2002).
Clark et al., “Error Correction Coding for Digital Communications,” Plenum Press NY (1981).
Hanna et al., “A Normalized Backpropagation Learning Algorithm for Multilayer Feed-Forward Neural Adaptive Filters,” Neural Networks for Signal Processing XI, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop pp. 63-72 (Sep. 2001).
Hekstra, “An Alternative to Metric Resealing in Viterbi Decoders,” IEEE Transactions on Communications vol. 37 No. 11 (Nov. 1989).
Hendrix, “Viterbi Decoding Techniques in the TMS320C54x Family,” Texas Instruments Application Note (Jun. 1996).
Janweijer et al., “A Compact Robin Using the SHarc (CRUSH),” Obtained from: http://www.nikhef.n1/˜peterj/Crush/CRUSH-hw.pdf (Sep. 1998).
Paaske et al., “High Speed Viterbi Decoder Architecture,” First ESA Workshop on Tracking, Telemetry and Command Systems, ESTEC (Jun. 1998).
Rajagopalan et al., “A Flexible Multiplication Unit for an FPGA Logic Block,” Circuits and Systems 4:546-9 (2001).
Xilinx Data Book 1998.
Xilinx Virtex 1.1 1998.
Xilinx Virtex 2.2 2000.
Yeo et al., “Implementation of High Throughput Soft Output Viterbi Decoders,” Proc. IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems pp. 146-151 San Diego CA (Oct. 2002).
Bogan et al., Power Reduction Techniques for a Viterbi Decoder Implementation, ESPLD Third Int'l Workshop, Jul. 25-28, 2000, pp. 28-48.
Chan et al., Low-power bit-serial viterbi decoder for 3rd generation W-CDMA systems, Proc. of the IEEE, 1999, pp. 589-592.
Garrett et al., Low power architecture of the soft-output Viterbi decoder algorithm, Proc. of the 1998 Int'l Symposium on low power electronics and design, 1998, pp. 262-267.
Kim et al., Implementation of convolutional encoder and Viterbi decoder for wideband CDMA PCT baseband processing unit using multiple TMS320C40s, Circuits and Systems, Proc. of IEEE Int'l Symposium, Jun. 9-12, 1997, pp. 2613-2616, vol. 4.
Matche et al., Trellis coding for diagonally layered space-time systems, Communications, 2002, ICC 2002, IEEE Int'l Conference, 2002, pp. 1388-1992, vol. 3.
Wang et al., Cell Search in W-CDMA, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, U.S., vol. 18, No. 8, Aug. 2008, pp. 1470-1482, XP002224578 ISSN: 0733-8716, p. 1470.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 10/015,531, dated Mar. 20, 2006.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 10/295,692, dated Dec. 14, 2006.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/797,583, dated May 4, 2009.
Office Action (Final) from U.S. Appl. No. 11/797,583, dated Oct. 10, 2008.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/015,531, dated Jul. 21, 2005.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/295,962, dated Apr. 4, 2006.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/797,583, dated Sep. 28, 2007.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090268789 A1 Oct 2009 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 11797583 May 2007 US
Child 12499756 US
Parent 10295692 Nov 2002 US
Child 11797583 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10015531 Dec 2001 US
Child 10295692 US