The present application is related to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/276,540, entitled “Scalable Database Management Software on a Cluster of Nodes Using a Shared-Distributed Flash Memory, filed on Nov. 24, 2008, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes as if fully set forth herein.
The disclosure herein relates to object version tracking using non-volatile memory write generations.
The term versioning is applied to the creation and management of multiple releases of an object such as a document, where all releases have the same general features but are improved, upgraded or customized. Commonly, the term is used for digital documents such as application source codes, operating systems, software packages, and management of data, art resources such as blueprints or electronic models, and other projects.
Data versioning is performed for a number of purposes including increased concurrency for applications requiring concurrency control, providing snapshot isolation for consistent data reads, and for the creation of backup snapshots to help recovery from hardware and software errors. Versioning involves retaining pre-update data values after data have been updated. For example, in case an error occurs and the results of a calculation are incorrect, restoring the pre-update data values could be very helpful. Versioning can be done incrementally on every update of each document (i.e., transactional versioning) or done globally at certain times (i.e., check-pointing with snapshots).
Using version control, one can keep track of different versions of electronic information, for example, in collaborative data sharing and editing among users of systems that employ different versions of a document. Version control systems are typically stand-alone applications. With the spread of use of non-volatile memories such as flash memories, there is a need for techniques that enable transactional versioning at the data element level, versioning for global snapshots, and other methods of version control in flash memories.
Embodiments of the present embodiments are described herein by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements, as follows.
Approaches for data versioning in a non-volatile memory are disclosed. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth such as examples of specific components, circuits, and processes to provide a thorough understanding of the present disclosure. Also, in the following description and for purposes of explanation, specific nomenclature is set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present embodiments. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that these specific details may not be required to practice the present embodiments. In other instances, well-known components are shown in block diagram form to avoid obscuring the present disclosure.
A method in accordance with present embodiments includes creating an object key associated with a data object. An index into an object table is generated using the object key. A version number is stored in conjunction with the data object stored in non-volatile memory. The object key and the location information of the data object in the non-volatile memory are stored in an object linked-list. A record associated with the data object is created in an object table. The record includes an index, a reference to the object linked-list, and the version number. The index is generated based on the object key.
Embodiments described provide approaches for data versioning, which uses flash memory controller write operations to create new data versions. Previous data versions are tracked using lists stored in non-volatile memory, such as in flash memory or another non-volatile memory. Approaches for obtaining correct versions and for recovering storage from unreferenced versions are presented.
In an embodiment, object table 140 may include multiple records each including an object table index 120, a reference 142 to an object linked-list, and a version number 144. Object table index 120 is generated based on an object key 110, which uniquely identifies data object 152. First, object key 110 is hashed, using well know algorithms, to produce a syndrome (e.g., a 32 bit syndrome). Then, a portion of the syndrome is masked to produce object table index 120, which is an index into the object table 140. The reference 142 to the object linked-list in object table 140 points to a linked object-list 130, which includes entries such as object key 110 and location information 132. Location information 132 includes a flash location or a list of flash locations depending on the data object identified by object key 110 (i.e., data object 152) being a single-page object or a multiple-page object (multi-page objects occupy more than one flash-pages and use full pages except for the last page).
Once the location of data object 152 has been determined the appropriate PCI-Express commands are issued to read the corresponding flash page (or portion of a flash page) into flash card-based non-volatile (NV) DRAM and from there to CPU memory.
Hardware platform 200 includes one or more solid state devices (SSDs) 210 and one or more parallel SSD controller(s) 212. As broadly used herein, SSD(s) 210 may be implemented using any type of solid state device, although examples discussed herein shall be explained in the context of SSD(s) 210 being implemented using flash memory and SSD controller 212 being a flash memory controller. Each SSD in SSD(s) 210 contains a write cache 228. In an embodiment, hardware platform 200 may include one or more hard-disk drives (HDDs) 214 and one or more HDD controller(s) 216. In an embodiment, each HDD controller in HDD controller(s) 216 may include a NV DRAM 226. In an embodiment, NV DRAM 226 may store one or more of fill pages 230 and one or more active fill pages 232 (both described in more detail below) for SSD 210.
NV DRAM 226 may be constructed using a DRAM which includes a battery so that if the power to the DRAM is disrupted, the battery will supply power to the DRAM, thereby ensuring that the data stored thereon may be persistently stored (at least until the battery runs out). Hardware platform 200 also includes network controller 218, PCIe HUB 220, one or more processors 222, and dynamic random access memory (DRAM) 224.
As a data object write operation occurs, data object 152 is written to the next unused sequential location in the fill-page 230. If data object 152 in the fill-page 230 is rewritten before the page is committed to flash memory 210, then it is generally written a second time since doing otherwise poses a risk to the previous copy if the system crashes during the write operation. The data object location is then updated in the object table 140 of
Flash memory controller 212 of
Further, there is a per-shard linked-list of all objects with the same version number with a head for each version number between the MVN 430 and CVN 410 inclusive. Similarly, the version number used in a get operation is determined by the application making the request with the default being the CVN 410. When the object table 140 and the associated object linked-list 130 of
Still referring to
In an embodiment, the snapshot application uses SVN 450 when performing get operations. Since looking up object table 140 is conditioned on the version number 144, a snapshotted lookup of a data object will not see any data object written after the snapshot is taken. When the application is finished with the snapshot, it performs a call to a sharing data fabric (SDF) to terminate the snapshot. SDF garbage collector then walks the per-shard linked-list for each version number between the MVN 430 and the CVN 410 (or between the MVN 430 and the version number of the oldest active snapshot) and releases the duplicate objects with lower version numbers. Finally, the MVN 430 is updated. SDF is a middleware layer that includes interface for communications between high-level programs and lower-level hardware controllers and their software and firmware programs. SDF is accessible by high-level application programs using an application programming interface (API). Communication between various nodes that may have stored various versions of a data object is performed by SDF threads. Below, versioning with commit is discussed.
In some embodiments, on a version request, SDF increments NVN 420 and returns the original (un-incremented) NVN 420 to the application as a versioned-version-number (VVN) 440. Other (non-snapshotted) applications will use CVN 410 for all put/get operations. When a data object is written by the versioned application, the new entry in object table 140 is added to the per-shard linked-list of data objects with the same version number (as always). Data object 152 is also marked as uncommitted. Any non-versioned application uses CVN 410 when performing get operations. Since the object table lookup is conditioned on the version number, a non-versioned application lookup of a data object will not see any data object written by the versioned application. If a copy of data object 152 is written by a non-versioned application then the versioned application will see that copy when it performs a get operation. If both the versioned and the non-versioned application write data object 152, then the non-versioned copy will be lost on commit. Locks must be used if this is not the desired behavior.
In an embodiment, when the application commits CVN 410, it will be updated to the VVN 440. A special commit record will be written to flash with the just-committed version number. This is used during reboot to re-mark the flash objects previously labeled as uncommitted. The SDF garbage collector eventually cleans up any duplicate copies of data objects with version numbers between the old CVN 410 and the VVN 440. Once this is complete the special commit record can also be removed by the garbage collector. The techniques herein also support versioning when an abort occurs as discussed below.
With continued reference to
Versioning collisions may occur when multiple transactions each create a version of the same container and then attempt to use data objects in conflicting ways. Note that there are never collisions between versions and snapshots since the snapshots are read-only by definition. There are several types of collisions such as write-write collisions (when both versions attempt to write the same data object); write-read collisions (when one version writes a data object which the other version attempts to read); and finally, read-write collisions (when a data object is read by one version and later written by the other version). The initial version of SDF will not attempt to detect collisions. Collision avoidance (if desired) is the responsibility of the application. Another embodiment discussed below addresses split versioning, which occurs when a single thread uses different version numbers to achieve different consistency levels.
Read-uncommitted, read-committed, and read-reproducible isolation operations, well-known in the art of database management, are supported directly by the SDF fabric. The version number used by an application for get operations need not be the same as the version number used by put operations. Applications may also use explicit version numbers either for gets or puts. However, the version must be either explicitly locked or released by the application. It is expected that most applications will use a SDF supplied library routine which specifies a database consistency level. The library routine will then be responsible for managing the explicit version numbers. Read-committed operations always use the version number of the most-recently committed version (which can change during a transaction). Read-uncommitted operations always use the highest-numbered, non-aborted version number. Normal (non-versioned) SDF get operations are treated as read-committed. Read-reproducible operations are somewhat different in that the application (or library routine) must “lock” the reproducible version with an application programming interface (API) call. This returns the version number of the most recently committed version and remains static for the duration of the transaction. The application (or library routine) must release the version when the transaction completes. Example API and library routines used in some embodiments are shown below.
Transaction API
Get/Put API
Log API
Library Routines:
Computer system 600 may be coupled to a display 612, such as a cathode ray tube (CRT), a LCD monitor, and a television set, for displaying information to a user. An input device 614, including alphanumeric and other keys, is coupled to computer system 600 for communicating information and command selections to processor 604. Other non-limiting, illustrative examples of input device 614 include a mouse, a trackball, or cursor direction keys for communicating direction information and command selections to processor 604 and for controlling cursor movement on display 612. While only one input device 614 is depicted in
Present embodiments are related to the use of computer system 600 for implementing the techniques described herein. According to one embodiment of the invention, those techniques are performed by computer system 600 in response to processor 604 executing one or more sequences of one or more instructions contained in main memory 606. Such instructions may be read into main memory 606 from another machine-readable medium, such as storage device 610. Execution of the sequences of instructions contained in main memory 606 causes processor 604 to perform the process steps described herein. In alternative embodiments, hard-wired circuitry may be used in place of, or in combination with, software instructions to implement embodiments of the invention. Thus, embodiments of the invention are not limited to any specific combination of hardware circuitry and software.
The term “machine-readable storage medium” as used herein refers to any medium that participates in storing instructions which may be provided to processor 604 for execution. Such a medium may take many forms, including but not limited to, non-volatile media and volatile media. Non-volatile media includes, for example, optical or magnetic disks, such as storage device 610. Volatile media includes dynamic memory, such as main memory 606.
Non-limiting, illustrative examples of machine-readable media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, magnetic tape, or any other magnetic medium, a CD-ROM, or any other optical medium, a RAM, a PROM, and EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, or any other memory chip or cartridge, or any other medium from which a computer can read.
Various forms of machine readable media may be involved in carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions to processor 604 for execution. For example, the instructions may initially be carried on a magnetic disk of a remote computer. The remote computer can load the instructions into its dynamic memory and send the instructions over a network link 620 to computer system 600.
Communication interface 618 provides a two-way data communication coupling to a network link 620 that is connected to network 630. For example, communication interface 618 may be a local area network (LAN) card to provide a data communication connection to a compatible LAN. Wireless links may also be implemented. In any such implementation, communication interface 618 sends and receives electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals that carry digital data streams representing various types of information. Network link 620 typically provides data communication through one or more networks to other data devices. For example, network link 620 may provide a connection through a local network to a host computer or to data equipment operated by an Internet Service Provider (ISP).
Computer system 600 can send messages and receive data, including program code, through the network(s), network link 620 and communication interface 618. For example, a server might transmit a requested code for an application program through the Internet, a local ISP, a local network, and subsequently to communication interface 618. The received code may be executed by processor 604 as it is received, and/or stored in storage device 610, or other non-volatile storage for later execution.
One or more embodiments described herein provide that methods, techniques, and actions performed by a computing device are performed programmatically, or as a computer-implemented method. Programmatically means through the use of code or computer-executable instructions. A programmatically performed step may or may not be automatic.
One or more embodiments described herein may be implemented using programmatic modules or components. A programmatic module or component may include a program, a subroutine, a portion of a program, or a software component or a hardware component capable of performing one or more stated tasks or functions. As used herein, a module or component can exist on a hardware component independently of other modules or components. Alternatively, a module or component can be a shared element or process of other modules, programs or machines.
While the present embodiments have been described with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. For example, features or aspects of any of the embodiments may be applied, at least where practicable, in combination with any other of the embodiments or in place of counterpart features or aspects thereof. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4916605 | Beardsley et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5046002 | Takashi et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5057996 | Cutler et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5117350 | Parrish et al. | May 1992 | A |
5212789 | Rago | May 1993 | A |
5287496 | Chen et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5297258 | Hale et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5394555 | Hunter et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5403639 | Belsan et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5423037 | Hvasshovd | Jun 1995 | A |
5509134 | Fandrich et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5537534 | Voigt et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5603001 | Sukegawa et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5611057 | Pecone et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613071 | Rankin et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5680579 | Young et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5692149 | Lee | Nov 1997 | A |
5701480 | Raz | Dec 1997 | A |
5742787 | Talreja | Apr 1998 | A |
5887138 | Hagersten et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897661 | Baranovsky et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5897664 | Nesheim et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5963983 | Sakakura et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6000006 | Bruce et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023745 | Lu | Feb 2000 | A |
6052815 | Zook | Apr 2000 | A |
6130759 | Blair | Oct 2000 | A |
6141692 | Loewenstein et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151688 | Wipfel et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6216126 | Ronstrom | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6298390 | Matena et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308169 | Ronstrom et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6434144 | Romanov | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6467060 | Malakapalli et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6615313 | Kato et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6658526 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6728826 | Kaki et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6745209 | Holenstein et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6804766 | Noel et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6874044 | Chou et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6938084 | Gamache et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6944699 | Bugnion et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6981070 | Luk et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7003586 | Bailey et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7010521 | Hinshaw et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7043621 | Merchant et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7082481 | Lambrache et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7162467 | Eshleman et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7200718 | Duzett | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7203890 | Normoyle | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7249280 | Lamport et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7251749 | Fong et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7269708 | Ware | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7269755 | Moshayedi et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7272605 | Hinshaw et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7272654 | Brendel | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7281160 | Stewart | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7305386 | Hinshaw et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7334154 | Lorch et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7359927 | Cardente | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7383290 | Mehra et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7406487 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7415488 | Muth et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7417992 | Krishnan | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7467265 | Tawri et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7529882 | Wong | May 2009 | B2 |
7542968 | Yokomizo et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7562162 | Kreiner et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7584222 | Georgiev | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7610445 | Manus et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7623494 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7627618 | Honigfort | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7647449 | Roy et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7657710 | Loewenstein | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7809691 | Karmarkar et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7822711 | Ranade | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7885923 | Tawri et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7917472 | Persson | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8015352 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8018729 | Skinner | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8024515 | Auerbach et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8037349 | Mandagere et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8069328 | Pyeon | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8099391 | Monckton | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8205206 | ÖZer et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8225053 | McCorkendale et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8239617 | Linnell | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8261266 | Pike et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8261289 | Kasravi et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8321450 | Thatte et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8335776 | Gokhale | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8370853 | Giampaolo et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8401994 | Hoang et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20020089933 | Giroux et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020129192 | Spiegel et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020166031 | Chen et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184239 | Mosher, Jr. et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030016596 | Chiquoine et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030097610 | Hofner | May 2003 | A1 |
20030177408 | Fields et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030220985 | Kawamoto et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040010502 | Bomfim et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040078379 | Hinshaw et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040143562 | Chen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148283 | Harris et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172494 | Pettey et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040205151 | Sprigg et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230862 | Merchant et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040267835 | Zwilling et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005074 | Landin et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021565 | Kapoor et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027701 | Zane et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050028134 | Zane et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050034048 | Nemawarkar et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050081091 | Bartfai et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086413 | Lee et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050120133 | Slack-Smith | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131964 | Saxena | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050240635 | Kapoor et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246487 | Ergan et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060059428 | Humphries et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064549 | Wintergerst | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060085594 | Roberson et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060130063 | Kilian et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161530 | Biswal et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060174063 | Soules et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060174069 | Shaw et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179083 | Kulkarni et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195648 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060212795 | Cottrille et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218210 | Sarma et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060242163 | Miller et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253724 | Zhang | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070038794 | Purcell et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043790 | Kryger | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043860 | Pabari | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070073896 | Rothman et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070143368 | Lundsgaard et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156842 | Vermeulen et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174541 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070234182 | Wickeraad et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070276784 | Piedmonte | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070283079 | Iwamura et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288692 | Bruce et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288792 | Thorpe et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294564 | Reddin et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299816 | Arora et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080016300 | Yim et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034076 | Ishikawa et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034174 | Traister et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034249 | Husain et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046538 | Susarla et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046638 | Maheshwari et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080126706 | Newport et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080172402 | Birdwell et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080256103 | Fachan et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080288713 | Lee et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080295105 | Özer et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301256 | McWilliams | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006500 | Shiozawa et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090006681 | Hubert et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090006888 | Bernhard et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019456 | Saxena et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024871 | Emaru et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030943 | Kall | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090059539 | Ryu et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090070530 | Satoyama et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090150599 | Bennett | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090177666 | Kaneda | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198791 | Menghnani | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090240664 | Dinker et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240869 | O'Krafka et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090327751 | Koifman et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100058021 | Kawamura | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100125695 | Wu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100241895 | Li et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100262762 | Borchers et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100299490 | Attarde et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100318821 | Kwan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325498 | Nagadomi | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110022566 | Beaverson et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110072206 | Ross et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082985 | Haines et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110099420 | MacDonald McAllister et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110167038 | Wang et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110179279 | Greevenbosch et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185147 | Hatfield et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110191299 | Huynh Huu et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110225214 | Guo | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1548600 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1746510 | Jan 2007 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Ajmani, Automatic Software Upgrades for Distributed Systems, MIT, Sep. 2004. |
Walker, Hash Table Tutorial, accessed Oct. 13, 2007, retrieved Feb. 28, 2014. |
McDonald, Architectural Semantics for Practical Transactional Memory, Jun. 2006, 12 pgs. |
Schooner Information Technology, IPAF, PCT/US2008/065167, Oct. 23, 2008, 7 pgs. |
Schooner Information Technology, ISR/WO, PCT/US2008/065167, Jan. 28, 2009, 16 pgs. |
Vijaykumar, Speculative Versioning Cache, Dec. 1, 2001, 13 pgs. |
“The Structre of the Reiser File System”, http://homes.cerias.purdue.edu, 21 pages, Jan. 26, 2006 (Author not provided). |
“ReiserFS”, http://en.wikipedia.org, 5 pages, Sep. 17, 2011. |
Bill Mcgonigle, “A short history of btrfs”, LWN.net,11 pages, Aug. 14, 2009. |
“Btrfs”, http://en.wikipedia.org, 9 pages, Oct. 3, 2011. |
“Tux3”, http://en.wikipedia.org, 3 pages, Jun. 2, 2010. |
“Tux3 Versioning Filesystem”, http://tux3.org/shapor-tux3/doc/design.html, 67 pages, Jul. 2008. |
“Tux3 Linux Filesystem Project”, http://tux3.org/, 1 page, 2008 (Author not provided). |
Chris Mellor, “ZFS—the futuer of file systems?”, Techworld.com, 5 pages, Aug. 14, 2006. |
“The Z File System (ZFS)”, FreeBSD Handbook, 8 pages, 2011 (Author not provided). |
“ZFS”, http://en.wikipedia.org, 18 pages, Sep. 30, 2011. |
David Hitz et al., “File System Design for an NFS File Server Appliance”, Technical Report 3002, USENIX Winter 1994, 23 pages, Jan. 19, 1994. |
“WAFL—Write Anywhere File Layout”, http://www.usenix.org, OSDI99,1 page, 1999 (Author not provided). |
“Write Anywhere File Layout”, http://en.wikipedia.org, 2 pages, Sep. 9, 2011. |
“Git (Software)”, http://en.wikipedia.org, 10 pages, Oct. 3, 2011. |
Scott Chacon, “Git, the fast version control system”, http://git-scm.com, github, 3 pages, (Date not provided). |
Michael Russell, “Track and record database schema versions”, developerWorks, http://www.ibm.com, 8 pages, Jun. 28, 2005. |
“SQL Server Database Schema Versioning and update”, Careers 2.0 by slackoverflow, 2 pages, Dec. 2, 2009. |
Shlomi Noach, “Database Schema under version control”, code.openark.org blog, 6 pages, 2011. |
DRice, “Toolkit version format”, http://developer.mozilla.org, 4 pages, Aug. 19, 2011. |
DRice, “Extension Versioning, Update and Compatibility”, http://developer.mozilla.org, 11 pages, Aug. 9, 2011. |
“Mercurial”, http://en.wikipedia.org, 6 pages, Oct. 2, 2011. |
“sufficiently advanced bug”, http://natabbotts.com, 3 pages, 2011 (Author not provided). |
“bsn-modulestore”, http://code.google.com, 2 pages, 2011 (Author not provided). |
“Module: Mongoid::Versioning”, http://rdoc.info, Documentation by Yard 0.7.2, 6 pages, 2011. |
Email Communication from James Bodwin to Christopher Brokaw regarding prior art, 4 pages, Sep. 13, 2011. |
Amza, Data Replication Strategies for Fault Tolerance and Availability on Commodity Clusters, 2000, 9 pgs. |
Chockler, Active Disk Paxos with infinitely many processes, Springer-Verlag, Apr. 2005, 12 pgs. |
Dwork, Concensus in the presence of partial synchrony, MIT, 1988, 6 pgs. |
Guerraoui, A Leader Election Protocol for Eventually Synchronous Shared Memory Systems, IEEE, 2006, 6 pgs. |
Lamport, Cheap Paxos, Microsoft, 2004, 9 pgs. |
Lamport, Fast Paxos, Microsoft, Jul. 2005, 43 pgs. |
Lamport, Generalized Consensus and Paxos, Microsoft, Mar. 2004, 25 pgs. |
Lamport, Paxos Made Simple, Nov. 2001, 14 pgs. |
Malkhi, Lecture notes in computer science [Section: Omega Meets Paxos, Leader election and stability without eventual timely links], 2005, pp. 199-213. |
Mukherjee et al., Verification of an Industrial CC-NUMA server, Proceedings of ASP-DAC 2002, 7th Asia and South Pacifric and the 15th International Conference on VLSI Design, Jan. 7-11, 2002, 6 pages. |
Pease, Reaching Agreement in the Presence of Faults, ACM, 1980, pp. 228-234. |
Schneider, Implementing fault tolerant services using the state machine, Cornell Univ., 1990, 21 pgs. |
Shacham et al., Verificaiton of chip multiprocessor memory systems using a relaxed scoreboard, Microarchitecture, 2008, MICRO-41, 2008, 41st IEEE/ACM International Symposium, Nov. 8-12, 2008, 12 pages. |
Unknown Author, Supermicro, “Intel Itanium Processor 9300 Series Based Server Systems,” Jul. 8, 2010, http://www.supermicro.com/products/nfo/itanium.cfm, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120259863 A1 | Oct 2012 | US |